The present invention relates to throwing wheel assemblies for abrasive blasting machines.
Centrifugal blasting machines are commonly used for stripping or cleaning floors, storage tank walls, metal castings, and other items. Some machines employ a throwing wheel assembly comprising a plurality of throwing blades mounted on only the front face of a single plate-type rotor, runner head, or other single plate wheel element. Other designs utilize wheels having a pair of opposing plates (i.e., a front plate and a back plate) between which the throwing blades are mounted. Although the single plate and double plate designs all have limited service lives, the single plate-type wheel designs are preferred by many in the art because they are simpler and much less costly to manufacture, balance, and replace.
The blasting machine throwing blades are adapted for receiving a stream of steel shot, hardened steel grit, other abrasive material, or a combination thereof and throwing the abrasive material radially outward from the wheel at an appropriate discharge point. Different treatment profiles can be provided by varying the type or mix ratio of the abrasive material, varying the abrasive size, and/or adjusting the rotating speed of the throwing wheel assembly. The abrasive material cleans the surface of the floor, wall or other item and typically rebounds, along with removed contaminants, dust, and debris, into a separator or other recovery chamber. Unfortunately, because of the action of the abrasive material within the centrifugal blasting apparatus, the throwing blades undergo considerable wear and must be replaced periodically.
In one common type of blasting assembly, the throwing wheel, throwing blades, and the rotating central impeller of the device are all cast in place as a unitary structure. Although such unitary cast structures do not require further assembly and do not present blade retention concerns during installation, they have significant shortcomings and disadvantages. For example, although the throwing wheel and other portions of the unitary cast structure are less susceptible to wear and damage than are the throwing blades, the entire cast structure must be replaced when the blades are worn, or if even just a single blade is chipped or broken. In addition, the unitary casting procedure does not allow the blade portion of the casting to be formed from a different, harder, more wear-resistant material. Further, the use of a harder, more wear-resistant material for forming the entire structure is not practical due to both higher cost and the poor casting characteristics of these harder materials which, for example, make them much more difficult to machine after heat treatment.
To address these issues, and to obtain the benefits of a single plate design, various efforts have been made to develop throwing assemblies wherein the throwing blades are removably mounted on the forward face of a single plate-type throwing wheel. One such throwing wheel assembly is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,311,584, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference. The prior art assembly comprises; a single plate throwing wheel; a hub affixed to the back of the throwing wheel; a plurality of throwing blades which are removably mount on, and are perpendicular to, the forward face of the throwing wheel; and an impeller centrally mounted on the hub between the inlet ends of the throwing blades. The blades generally extend radially away from the impeller.
As is generally the case, the impeller rotates with the throwing wheel for receiving a stream of abrasive blasting material from a spout and feeding the abrasive material to the throwing blades. The rotating impeller delivers the abrasive material through the discharge opening of a stationary control cage within which the impeller is rotatably positioned. The abrasive material is received on the inlet ends of the blades as the blades rotate past the cage opening. The abrasive material then moves outwardly along the throwing surfaces of the blades and is thrown from the distal ends of the blade throwing surfaces at a desired discharge point.
In the single plate throwing assembly described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,311,584, each of the throwing blades has a holding structure which projects laterally outward from the lower end of the rearwardly facing side edge of the blade. This lower holding structure is configured for removable, locking engagement with a corresponding retaining slot formed in the wheel face. Consequently, during operation, the centrifugal force exerted by the rotation of the throwing wheel operates to continuously urge the blades radially outward into secure engagement with the holding slots formed in the wheel face. However, in removable blade systems such as this when the system is being assembled and installed and there is no centrifugal force acting against the blades, additional retaining mechanisms are needed to at least temporarily hold the blades in place so that they do not fall off the wheel face.
To deal with this problem, U.S. Pat. No. 7,311,584 discloses the addition of a second (upper) holding structure to the side edge of each blade. These upper holding structures are received in peripheral detents formed around the throwing wheel wherein they are contacted with individual biasing springs. The biasing springs operate to continuously urge the throwing blades radially outward such that the lower blade holding structures are always held in locked engagement in the blade retaining slots.
As will be understood by those in the art, a continuing need exists for improved single plate rotating wheel assemblies having removable throwing blades. A need particularly exists for improved assemblies of this type which (a) are lower in cost, (b) are less complicated to assemble, install, and remove, (c) are easier to manufacture, and (d) provide a much simpler yet highly effective means for retaining the removable blades on the throwing wheel during assembly and installation procedures.
The present invention satisfies the need and alleviates the problems discussed above. In one aspect, there is provided an improved throwing apparatus of the type comprising a rotatable wheel and a plurality of throwing blades positionable on a forward face thereof, the rotatable wheel having an axis of rotation and each of the throwing blades having a holding structure projecting therefrom. The improvement comprises: (a) the forward face of the rotatable wheel including a recess surrounded by a forward peripheral portion of the forward face such that at least a portion of the recess is bounded circumferentially by an axially extending interior wall of the forward peripheral portion; (b) a blade retainer groove provided in the recess of the forward face proximate a rearward end of the interior wall for removably receiving a blade retainer; (c) a plurality of slots extending through the interior wall and outwardly into the forward peripheral portion away from the recess for removably receiving the holding structures of the throwing blades; and (d) the forward peripheral portion comprising a forward peripheral face surface which extends outwardly away from the recess at a rearward angle effective to allow the holding structures of the throwing blades to be delivered into and removed from the slots without interference from the blade retainer groove.
In another aspect, there is provide an improved apparatus for throwing an abrasive material, the apparatus being of a type comprising a rotatable wheel and a plurality of throwing blades positionable on a forward face of the rotatable wheel, the rotatable wheel having an axis of rotation and each of the blades having a holding structure projecting therefrom. The improvement comprises: (a) the forward face of the rotatable wheel including a recess surrounded by a forward peripheral portion of the forward face such that at least a portion of the recess is bounded circumferentially by an axial extending interior wall of the forward peripheral portion; (b) a blade retainer groove provided in the recess of the forward face proximate a rearward end of the interior wall for removably receiving a blade retainer; (c) a plurality of slots extending through the interior wall and outwardly into the forward peripheral portion away from the recess for receiving the holding structures of the throwing blades; and (d) the slots extending outwardly away from the recess at a rearward angle effective to allow the holding structures of the throwing blades to be delivered into and removed from the slots without interference from the blade retainer groove. Preferably, the holding structures are also configured such that, when the holding structures are received in the slots, the holding structures will extend outwardly away from the recess at a rearward angle corresponding to the rearward angle of the slots.
In another aspect, there is provided an improved apparatus for throwing an abrasive material, the apparatus being of the type comprising a rotatable wheel, a plurality of throwing blades positionable on a forward face of the rotatable wheel, an impeller for delivering the abrasive material to the blades, a drive shaft, and a hub positionable on a rearward side of the rotatable wheel. The improvement comprises: (a) the impeller having a locking structure which extends rearwardly from the impeller; (b) the locking structure being receivable in a corresponding locking slot provided in the recess of the forward face of the rotatable wheel; (c) the locking structure and the corresponding locking slot being configured in a manner effective for causing the impeller and the rotatable wheel to rotate together; (d) the drive shaft being receivable in an aperture provided in the hub in a keyed engagement with the hub such that the hub will be caused to rotate with the drive shaft; and (e) the impeller being attachable to the drive shaft by inserting a bolt rearwardly through a longitudinal bore in the locking structure and threading the bolt into a threaded aperture provided in a forward end of the drive shaft.
Further aspects, features, and advantages of the present invention will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon examining the accompanying drawings and upon reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments.
An embodiment 100 of the inventive throwing wheel assembly is depicted in
The structure, installation, and operation of the control cage 118, the control cage adaptor 116, the gravity feed spout 124, and the control cage locking clamps 126 will be readily understood and recognized by those of ordinary skill in the art.
As illustrated in
A circular groove 140 for removably holding the blade retainer 112 is provided in the face recess 130 proximate, most preferably directly adjacent to, the rearward axial end 142 of the interior sidewall 136. The cross-sectional shape of the circular groove 140 will correspond to the cross-sectional shape of the blade retainer 112. The circular groove 140 will most preferably have a semi-circular cross-sectional shape for receiving and removably retaining an O-ring element 112.
The present invention provides a very effective, yet much less costly and complex system for retaining the throwing blades 106 on the wheel face 104 during assembly and installation. After placing the projecting holding structures 144 of the blades 106 in the wheel slots 134 provided in the forward peripheral portion 132 of the wheel face 104, the blades are then conveniently retained in the wheel slots 134 by simply inserting an O-ring or other retaining element 112 in the circular groove 140. Likewise, the throwing blades 106 can be conveniently removed from the throwing wheel slots 134 by simply removing the retainer 112.
In order for the placement of an O-ring or other retainer 112 in the circular groove 140 to be effective for retaining the blade holding structures 144 in the wheel slots 134, the rearward axial depth of the wheel slots 134 is preferably such that the rearward ends of the blade holding structures 144 will come into contact with the retainer 112 and will thereby be blocked by the retainer 112 from leaving the inner ends of the slots 134. This convenient retaining ring arrangement would not be feasible if using a typical prior art single plate wheel. Moreover, if it were possible to install the throwing blades on the prior art single plate wheel, the retainer groove would itself block the removal of the blades, even after removing the retaining element therefrom.
In the inventive assembly 100, the use of the inventive retainer and groove arrangement is permitted and facilitated by one or a combination of additional inventive modifications to the rotating wheel 102. These improvements include: (a) sloping the forward surface 146 of the forward peripheral portion 132 of the wheel face 104 such that the forward surface 146 extends outwardly away from the recess 130 at a rearward angle 147 which is effective to allow the blade holding structures 144 to be delivered into and removed from the wheel slots 134 without interference from the circular groove 140; (b) forming the axially extending interior wall 136 of the forward peripheral portion 132 in a manner such that it converges rearwardly toward the axis of rotation 148 of the rotating wheel 102 at an angle 150; and/or (c) forming the wheel slots 134 such that they extend outwardly away from the recess 130 at a rearward angle 152 effective to allow the throwing blade holding structures 144 to be delivered into and removed from the wheel slots 134 without interference from the circular groove 140.
In the inventive assembly 100, a combination of these approaches is used such that the forward peripheral face surface 146, the interior wall 136, and the wheel slots 134 are all angled in the manner just described. In addition, the blade holding structures 144 are also configured such that, when installed, they will follow the orientation and angle of the wheel slots 134.
The rearward angle 147 of the forward peripheral face surface 146 of the rotating wheel will preferably be in the range of from about 4° to about 12° from a radial plane 154 perpendicular to the axis of rotation 148. The rearward angle 147 of the forward peripheral surface 146 will most preferably be about 8°. The rearward angle 152 of the blade retaining slots 134 will preferably be in the range of from about 4° to about 12° from the radial plane 154. The rearward angle 152 of the blade retaining slots 134 will most preferably be about 8°.
The interior wall 136 of the forward peripheral portion 132 will preferably be of a substantially conical shape such that the angle of rearward convergence 150 of the interior wall 136 toward the axis of rotation 148 of the rotating wheel 102 will be in the range of from about 2° to about 8°. The angle 150 of the interior wall 136 will most preferably be about 5°.
As illustrated in
In addition to the modifications discussed above, the inventive throwing assembly 100 further comprises: a locking structure 170 which is formed on and projects rearwardly from the impeller 122; a correspondingly shaped locking slot 172 formed through the base 174 of the rotating wheel recess 130 for receiving the locking structure 170 such that the impeller 122 and the throwing wheel 102 will be caused to rotate together; a central aperture 176 formed through the rearward assembly hub 108 for receiving the driveshaft 178 of the throwing device; a longitudinal key slot 180 provided in the hub aperture 176 which mates with a corresponding longitudinal key 182 provided on the drive shaft 178 such that the hub is caused to rotate with the drive shaft; a plurality of drive pins 177 which extend forwardly from bores 179 formed in the hub 108 for engaging slots 181 in the rearward face of the throwing wheel 102 such that the throwing eel 102 and hub 108 are caused to rotate together; and a bore 184 extending through the rearward locking structure 170 of the impeller 122 such that the impeller 122 can be attached to the drive shaft by inserting a locking bolt 186 rearwardly through the bore 184 and then threading the locking bolt 186 into a threaded aperture 188 provided in the forward end of the drive shaft 178.
As will be understood by those in the art, alternative keying arrangements between the drive shaft 178 and the hub 108 could alternatively be used such as, for example, providing a key slot on the drive shaft 178 and a corresponding key in the hub aperture 176. It will also be understood that the drive shaft 178 can be directly driven by an electric motor or other device or can be indirectly driven using a belt, a gear, or any other driving system.
Thus, the present invention is well adapted to carry out the objectives and attain the ends and advantages mentioned above as well as those inherent therein. While presently preferred embodiments have been described for purposes of this disclosure, numerous changes and modifications will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. Such changes and modifications are encompassed within the invention as defined by the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2819562 | Barnes | Jan 1958 | A |
3197920 | Moore et al. | Aug 1965 | A |
3241266 | Bowling, Jr. | Mar 1966 | A |
3352064 | De Groot et al. | Nov 1967 | A |
3383804 | Haider | May 1968 | A |
3654736 | De Groot | Apr 1972 | A |
3894360 | DeGroot et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
4471583 | Carpenter et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4941297 | Carpenter | Jul 1990 | A |
5081801 | Fylak | Jan 1992 | A |
5888125 | Kuehn | Mar 1999 | A |
6981910 | Goff | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7311584 | Goff | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7585207 | Barriger | Sep 2009 | B2 |