Thrust correction

Abstract

In a method for determining the free field thrust of a gas turbine engine the gas turbine engine is attached to a movable support means in an enclosed gas turbine engine test facility, and is operated at a selected engine operating point. The thrust applied by the engine to the thrust cradle is measured via thrust measurement means. Calculations are performed to determine the gas turbine engine intake momentum drag generated by airflow into the gas turbine engine intake, the thrust cradle drag force generated by airflow past the moveable support means of the thrust cradle, the base drag generated as a result of accelerating nozzle ejector airflow, a pre-stream tube force related to turning of stream lines in the intake air path, a pre-stream tube force related to a bell mouth pull-off force. Also forces due to forward anemometer plane and nozzle static pressures and a nozzle exit buoyancy force and determined, and all of these forces are summed according to their respective positive and negative values to determine the free field thrust of the engine at the selected engine operating point.

Description

The invention and how it may be carried out in practice will now be described with reference to an example illustrated by the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a schematic plan view of a typical indoor test facility;

FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic representation of a “first principles” method of the kind described in our earlier patent;

FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic representation of a revised “first principles” method in accordance with the present invention with descriptive annotations; and

FIG. 4 is a further diagrammatic representation of the revised “first principles” method of FIG. 3 in which the descriptive annotations have been replaced by corresponding equation terms.

Traditionally, test facility calibration has been carried out as a direct empirical back-to-back comparison of engine performance between the indoor test facility and an outdoor free-field test facility. In making this correction it has been assumed that the engine is located in an infinite atmosphere of still air. Unfortunately, due to inconsistent climatic conditions and environmental issues such as pollution and noise, testing engines on an outdoor test facility has become limited, time consuming and costly. Although the invention has been developed and utilised in the United Kingdom, where such weather conditions are well known, it is not intended that use of the invention should be so limited. We believe the invention will be found to be useful anywhere. Not only do outdoor test facilities in such temperate and changeable weather conditions produces inconsistent results, but indoor test facilities offer a more controllable environment if only for the possibility of excluding foreign objects. Furthermore, the new generation of large civil engines has outgrown currently available “industry standard” outdoor test facilities. Also as a consequence of better understanding of ground effects and micro-climates, and in part better investigative instrumentation and CFD modeling, current estimates of the uncertainty in gross thrust total measurement is estimated to be ±0.5% (random) plus −0.5% to −1.0% (systematic) when using the free field method.

Our earlier patent described an alternative to the free field method based on a first principles methodology for aerodynamic thrust correction for an indoor test facility, using arrays of anemometers and static pressure measurement devices in an extensive aerodynamic survey. This stand-alone methodology can be used in isolation or with reference to any other source, effectively relating an indoor test facility to free field using first principles. The present invention comprises an improvement in the said method using the same basic indoor test facility.

FIG. 1 illustrates a typical indoor “U” shaped sea level test facility with main features, airflow paths and an introduction to first principle measurement planes and positions. The test facility building is indicated in outline at 2, and the gas turbine engine undergoing test at 4 mounted on a pylon generally indicated at 6. Ambient air enters through intake system 8 located in one limb 10 of the “U-shaped” building and exhaust gas and entrained air is expelled through exhaust system 12 housed in the other limb 14 of the building. A flared bell-mouth venturi airmeter 16, incorporating a debris guard 18 is fitted to the front of engine 4, while the hot engine exhaust nozzle is directed into the open mouth of a free standing exhaust detuner 20. From the detuner hot gas escapes into the facility exhaust system 12 and is returned to outside atmosphere. In the drawing of FIG. 1 the various items of measuring apparatus are installed at measuring points marked by an “x”.

The measuring apparatus includes a number, typically up to nine but there may be more, shrouded anemometers 24 mounted in cruciform arrangement mounted on a grid 22 upstream of the engine intake. Another series of anemometers 26 are mounted on the engine thrust cradle (or mounting pylon) 6 and at points around the engine to enable measurement of pressure loading due to the bypass airflow. A set of static pressure sensors 28 is mounted on the engine exhaust nozzle.

According to our earlier patent the basic method for determining the free-field thrust of a gas turbine engine using an enclosed engine test facility of this kind assumes a static pressure field equilibrium throughout the test cell facility. Hence, the forces within a “control volume” thrust momentum box, surrounding the engine within the test facility, including the forward anemometer plane can be either measured directly or calculated from direct measurements

This assumption is considered acceptable for test cell applications in which the airflow velocity is stable, uniform and in the region of 30 ft/sec or less, with an entrainment ratio greater than 2 to 1 and an overall aerodynamic thrust correction of 4% or less. In these cases it is believed that any additional or unaccounted forces, particularly p0(A0−A1) and p0(A1−A8) shown on FIG. 2 are considered negligible (<0.1% of gross thrust), and therefore cancel in the following equation (5).

Therefore

$\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{Gross}\mathrm{Thrust}=W_j·V_j+P_j·A_j-P_0·\left(A_1\text{-}A_j\right)-P_0·\left(A_0\text{-}A_1\right)+\\ \left(W_1·V_0+P_0·A_0\right)+\mathrm{Cradle}\mathrm{Drag}+\mathrm{Base}\mathrm{Drag}\\ =W_j·V_j-\left(P_j\text{-}P_0\right)A_j+W_1·V_0+\mathrm{Cradle}\mathrm{Drag}+\mathrm{Base}\mathrm{Drag}\\ =\mathrm{Net}\mathrm{Thrust}\left(\mathrm{measured}\right)+\mathrm{Inlet}\mathrm{Momentum}+\\ \mathrm{Cradle}\mathrm{Drag}+\mathrm{Base}\mathrm{Drag}\end{array}$

Current industry standard large civil engine indoor test facilities are unlikely to be able to achieve the aerodynamic requirement assumptions listed for the basic method, particularly regarding minimum airflow velocity. This, coupled with the likelihood of a tighter uncertainty assessment requirement for customer compliance demonstration, necessitates a far more rigorous assessment of any potential additional and unaccounted forces that are deemed negligible with the basic method.

Therefore, the additional terms hitherto considered negligible and shown on FIG. 2 are likely to become more significant and need to be quantified as additional engine buoyancy forces. FIGS. 3 & 4 illustrate a revised full control volume thrust momentum box in description and equation form respectively, that enable first principles thrust correction to be aligned with other methods (“ideal free field” or “nozzle rig”), and thus “thrust in flight” accounting for example for the purposes of civil engine compliance demonstration.

Therefore—in descriptive form:

Gross thrust=Net thrust+Inlet momentum−Pre-entry streamtube force−External bell mouth scroll buoyancy+Engine buoyancy forces+Cradle drag+Friction drag−Nozzle exit buoyancy force;

And in equation form:

Gross thrust=FN+W0.V0−∫(p−p0)δA_stream−∫(p−p0)δA_bm+∫(p−p0)δA_eng+Cradle drag+Friction drag−A_j(p_ref−p0);

Where:—p_ref=P_j*(p0 “free-field”/P_j “free-field”) for “free-field” nozzle coefficient accounting, and from entrainment flow

In addition to the variables accounted for in the basic method the present invention involves expanded calculation of the following additional requirements which are included in order to enable the derivation of the additional terms:—a stream tube pre-entry force using CFD model integration or simple 1D entrainment flow calculation (not directly measurable) is derived; a bell mouth buoyancy (pull-off) term also using the CFD or 1D calculation as above. Static pressure measurement sensors (p0) are fitted at the traversing boom (A₀) plane; static pressure measurement sensors are fitted to the rear face of the bell mouth scroll; and static pressure measurement sensors (P_j) are fitted at the (A_j) plane. This can be achieved using an existing design of piezo-ring, which is additional to current base drag static pressure measurement.

This additional information enables the following additional terms to be quantified:—Pre-entry stream tube force (turning stream lines) from CFD and/or 1D calculation; Pre-entry stream tube force (bell mouth pull-off) from CFD and/or 1D calculation and/or measured static pressure Δp (bell mouth−boom(p0)); Nozzle exit buoyancy force from CFD and/or measured static pressure Δp ((p_ref)−boom(p0)); Engine buoyancy forces shown are currently represented by base drag in the basic method. Friction drag is considered negligible.

It is to be noted that for present purposes: p_ref is determined from P_j with a correction defined from free field or nozzle rig measurements; p_ref is also used for ram-ratio definition corrections in the engine performance synthesis model; and p0 should now replace cell pressure as the datum for basic method cradle and base drags.

Some of the above terms are self-cancelling. However, the net result for the highest flowing engine (currently in production) was between −0.2% & −0.3% of gross thrust relative to the basic first principles method. Although this revised method remains valid when testing smaller low flow engines in the regime described for the basic method, the estimated error is in the region of −0.02%.

Among the advantages and benefits obtained from use of the “First Principles” method are significant quality improvements; derived thrust correction uncertainty (including repeatability) is improved from an estimated ±0.8% to ±0.25%. This includes eliminating two of the calibration legs in a B-A-B type cross-calibration and the time taken waiting for acceptable free field testing environmental conditions in a typical inconsistent UK climate. Another significant benefit is the ability to calibrate an indoor test facility from the commencement of a new engine project. An ability to re-calibrate indoor test facilities (including masters) at any time “in situ”, without reference to any other source, thus eliminating expensive A-B-A type back-to-back testing is another significant advantage.

Claims

1. A method for determining the free field thrust of a gas turbine engine by use of an enclosed gas turbine engine test facility including the steps of attaching the gas turbine engine to a movable support means, operating the gas turbine engine at a selected engine operating point, measuring the thrust applied by the engine to the thrust cradle via the thrust measurement means, calculating the gas turbine engine intake momentum drag generated by airflow into the gas turbine engine intake, calculating the thrust cradle drag force generated by airflow past the moveable support means of the thrust cradle, calculating the base drag generated as a result of accelerating nozzle ejector airflow, calculating a pre-stream tube force related to turning of stream lines in the intake air path, calculating a pre-stream tube force related to a bell mouth pull-off force, determining forces due to forward anemometer plane and nozzle static pressures and a nozzle exit buoyancy force, and summing these forces according to their respective positive and negative values to determine the free field thrust of the engine at the selected engine operating point.

2. A method for determining the free field thrust of a gas turbine engine as claimed in claim 1 wherein: Gross thrust=FN+W0.V0−∫(p−p0)δAstream−∫(p−p0)δAbm+∫(p−p0)δAeng+Cradle drag+Friction drag−Aj(pref−p0);