Thrust Limits for Wind Turbines

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20200347822
  • Publication Number
    20200347822
  • Date Filed
    March 03, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Published
    November 05, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
A method for defining a plurality of thrust limits for a wind turbine having a rotor with a plurality of blades and being located at a site. The thrust limits define values of aerodynamic thrust on the rotor not to be exceeded in operation. The method comprises providing a wind speed distribution representative for the site, and defining a plurality of isolines of constant turbulence probability representing a turbulence parameter as a function of wind speed. The turbulence parameter is indicative of wind speed variation. The isolines correspond to quantile levels of turbulence of the wind speed distribution. Turbulence ranges may be defined with respect to the isolines and thrust limits can be defined for the turbulence ranges. The disclosure also relates to methods of operating wind turbines using thrust limits and to wind turbines with suitable control systems.
Description

The present disclosure relates to defining thrust limits for aerodynamic thrust on rotor of wind turbines. The present disclosure further relates to using such thrust limits in wind turbine operation.


BACKGROUND

Modern wind turbines are commonly used to supply electricity into the electrical grid. Wind turbines of this kind generally comprise a tower and a rotor arranged on the tower. The rotor, which typically comprises a hub and a plurality of blades, is set into rotation under the influence of the wind on the blades. Said rotation generates a torque that is normally transmitted through a rotor shaft to a generator, either directly (“directly driven”) or through the use of a gearbox. This way, the generator produces electricity which can be supplied to the electrical grid.


A variable speed wind turbine may typically be controlled by varying the generator torque and the pitch angle of the blades. As a result, aerodynamic torque, rotor speed and electrical power will vary.


A common prior art control strategy of a variable speed wind turbine is described with reference to FIG. 3. In FIG. 3, the operation of a typical variable speed wind turbine is illustrated in terms of the pitch angle (β), the electrical power generated (P), the generator torque (M) and the rotational velocity of the rotor (ω), as a function of the wind speed.


In a first operational range, from the cut-in wind speed to a first wind speed (e.g. approximately 5 or 6 m/s), the rotor may be controlled to rotate at a substantially constant speed that is just high enough to be able to accurately control it. The cut-in wind speed may be e.g. approximately 3 m/s.


In a second operational range, from the first wind speed (e.g. approximately 5 or 6 m/s) to a second wind speed (e.g. approximately 8.5 m/s), the objective is generally to maximize power output while maintaining the pitch angle of the blades constant so as to capture maximum energy. In order to achieve this objective, the generator torque and rotor speed may be varied so as keep the tip speed ratio λ (tangential velocity of the tip of the rotor blades divided by the prevailing wind speed) constant so as to maximize the power coefficient Cp.


In order to maximize power output and keep Cp constant at its maximum value, the rotor torque may be set in accordance with the following equation: T=k·ω2, wherein k is a constant, and ω is the rotational speed of the generator. In a direct drive wind turbine, the generator speed substantially equals the rotor speed. In a wind turbine comprising a gearbox, normally, a substantially constant ratio exists between the rotor speed and the generator speed.


In a third operational range, which starts at reaching nominal rotor rotational speed and extends until reaching nominal power, the rotor speed may be kept constant, and the generator torque may be varied to such effect. In terms of wind speeds, this third operational range extends substantially from the second wind speed to the nominal wind speed e.g. from approximately 8.5 m/s to approximately 11 m/s.


In a fourth operational range, which may extend from the nominal wind speed to the cut-out wind speed (for example from approximately 11 m/s to 25 m/s), the blades may be rotated (“pitched”) to maintain the aerodynamic torque delivered by the rotor substantially constant. In practice, the pitch may be actuated such as to maintain the rotor speed substantially constant. At the cut-out wind speed, the wind turbine's operation is interrupted.


In the first, second and third operational ranges, i.e. at wind speeds below the nominal wind speed (the sub-nominal zone of operation), the blades are normally kept in a constant pitch position, namely the “below rated pitch position”. Said default pitch position may generally be close to a 0° pitch angle. The exact pitch angle in “below rated” conditions however depends on the complete design of the wind turbine.


The before described operation may be translated into a so-called power curve, such as the one shown in FIG. 3. Such a power curve may reflect the theoretical optimum operation of the wind turbine. However, in a range of wind speeds around the nominal wind speed, the aerodynamic thrust on the rotor may be high, as illustrated in FIG. 4. Such a high aerodynamic thrust leads to high bending loads at the blade root. The high loads at the blade root in turn can lead to high loads in the tower. If a wind turbine suffers from high loads repeatedly, the fatigue life of wind turbine components such as the blades can be reduced.


It is known in the prior art to define a thrust limit. A thrust limit may be understood as a maximum level of aerodynamic thrust on the rotor that may not be exceeded in operation. The operation of the wind turbine is thus adjusted, when necessary, to avoid the thrust exceeding the thrust limit. The operation thus deviates from the theoretical optimum operation, and the electrical energy output is negatively affected.


In some sites, and particularly in offshore applications, it has been found that blades sometimes suffer from high loads at the root and fatigue damage in highly turbulent winds, even if such a thrust limit has been defined.


SUMMARY

In one aspect, a method is provided for defining a plurality of thrust limits for a wind turbine having a rotor with a plurality of blades and being located at a site. The thrust limits define values of aerodynamic thrust on the rotor not to be exceeded in operation. The method comprises providing a wind speed distribution representative for the site, and defining a plurality of isolines of constant turbulence probability representing a turbulence parameter as a function of wind speed. The isolines correspond to quantile levels of turbulence of the wind speed distribution. The turbulence parameter is indicative of wind speed variation. The method further comprises defining turbulence ranges with respect to the isolines and defining thrust limits for the turbulence ranges.


In accordance with this aspect, a plurality of thrust limits can be defined from which one can be selected in operation in accordance with circumstances. For the conditions of high turbulence, a lower thrust limit may be defined and for low turbulence conditions, a higher thrust limit may be defined. By selecting thrust limits in this manner, high loads on wind turbine components can be reduced, while maximizing power output of the wind turbine when possible (i.e. in low turbulence conditions).


By using a probabilistic approach based on quantile levels of turbulence for the definition of different thrust levels, a good possible trade-off between the alleviation of the structural loads and the power extraction from the wind has been found.


Definition of thrust limits in this manner also allows for site specific tuning based on the turbulence intensity distribution at the site of interest. Both the confidence levels and the thresholds can be tuned to maximize the power extraction from the wind for sites with relatively low turbulence, considering that the load level will probably stay within the design boundaries. On the other hand, for sites where high turbulence may be expected, a better trade-off between structural safety (in terms of loads) and power extraction can be achieved by a proper definition of the confidence levels and relative thrust thresholds.


In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a wind turbine comprising a rotor with a plurality of blades, one or more pitch systems for rotating the blades around longitudinal axes of the blades, a generator and a control system. In this aspect, the control system is configured to determine a wind speed and a turbulence, to select a thrust level based on the turbulence and the estimated wind speed, wherein the thrust level is selected from a plurality of thrust limits for different turbulence ranges and to send signals to the pitch systems to collectively pitch the blades such that aerodynamic thrust on the rotor is below the selected thrust level. The plurality of thrust levels according to this aspect are determined by quantile-based regression of a wind speed distribution of wind speed and a parameter indicative of turbulence.


In yet another aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for operating a wind turbine including a rotor with a plurality of blades. The method comprises determining a time series of wind speeds and deriving a mean wind speed and a turbulence parameter indicating variation of the wind speed. The method further comprises selecting a thrust limit from a plurality of thrust limits based on the derived turbulence parameter and wind speed; and operating the wind turbine such that a thrust on the rotor is below the selected thrust limit. The plurality of thrust limits is defined for ranges of the turbulence parameter at mean wind speed, wherein the ranges of the turbulence parameter at mean wind speed are defined by confidence intervals that the turbulence parameter for the mean wind speed is below a given value in wind data representative for a location of the wind turbine.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Non-limiting examples of the present disclosure will be described in the following, with reference to the appended drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 illustrates a perspective view of a wind turbine according to one example;



FIG. 2 illustrates a simplified, internal view of a nacelle of a wind turbine according to one example;



FIG. 3 illustrates a power curve of a wind turbine according to the prior art;



FIG. 4 schematically illustrates an aerodynamic thrust as a function of wind speed when a wind turbine is operated according to a theoretical power curve;



FIG. 5 schematically illustrates an example of determining an isoline of constant turbulence;



FIG. 6 schematically illustrates an example of a method of operating a wind turbine;



FIGS. 7-9 schematically illustrate the effect of dynamic thrust levels for different wind distributions; and



FIGS. 10 and 11 schematically illustrate the effect of varying thrust levels on the annual energy yield and the blade root bending moments.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLES

In these figures the same reference signs have been used to designate matching elements.



FIG. 1 illustrates a perspective view of one example of a wind turbine 1. As shown, the wind turbine 1 includes a tower 2 extending from a support surface 3, a nacelle 4 mounted on the tower 2, and a rotor 5 coupled to the nacelle 4. The rotor 5 includes a rotatable hub 6 and at least one rotor blade 7 coupled to and extending outwardly from the hub 6. For example, in the illustrated example, the rotor 5 includes three rotor blades 7. However, in an alternative embodiment, the rotor 5 may include more or less than three rotor blades 7. Each rotor blade 7 may be spaced from the hub 6 to facilitate rotating the rotor 5 to enable kinetic energy to be transferred from the wind into usable mechanical energy, and subsequently, electrical energy. For instance, the hub 6 may be rotatably coupled to an electric generator 10 (FIG. 2) positioned within the nacelle 4 or forming part of the nacelle to permit electrical energy to be produced. The rotation of the rotor may be directly transmitted, e.g. in direct drive wind turbines, or through the use of a gearbox to a generator.



FIG. 2 illustrates a simplified, internal view of an example of a nacelle 4 of a wind turbine 1. The rotor 5 may include a main rotor shaft 8 coupled to the hub 6 for rotation therewith. The generator 10 may then be coupled to the rotor shaft 8 such that rotation of the rotor shaft 8 drives the generator 10. For instance, in the illustrated embodiment, the generator 10 includes a generator shaft 11 rotatably coupled to the rotor shaft 8 through a gearbox 9.


In FIG. 2, the wind turbine rotor 5 may be rotatably mounted on a support frame 12 through two rotor bearings at a coupling region. In other examples, the support frame 12 may not extend through the hub 6 and therefore the rotor may be supported by a single rotor bearing, commonly called the main bearing.


The generator 10 may be electrically coupled to the converter. The wind turbine converter may adapt the output electrical power of the generator to the requirements of the electrical grid. In some examples, the converter may be placed inside the nacelle 4; however, in other examples it may be placed in other locations of the wind turbine.


It should be appreciated that the rotor 5 of the wind turbine and the generator 10 may be supported by a bedplate or a support frame 12 positioned atop the wind turbine tower 2.


The nacelle 4 is rotatably coupled to the tower 2 through a yaw system 20. The yaw system comprises a yaw bearing (not visible in FIG. 2) having two bearing components configured to rotate with respect to the other. The tower 2 is coupled to a first bearing component and the nacelle 4, e.g. the bedplate or support frame 12, is coupled to the second bearing component. The yaw system 20 comprises an annular gear 21 and a plurality of yaw drives 22 with a motor 23, a gearbox 24 and a pinion 25 for meshing with the annular gear for rotating one of the bearing components with respect to the other.



FIG. 3 illustrates a power curve of a wind turbine according to the prior art. The operation of a variable speed wind turbine as a function of wind speed has hereinbefore explained. It may be noted that the operation of the wind turbine is not necessarily based on an actual direct measurement of wind speed. Rather, the wind speed may be derived or estimated from the speed of rotation of the rotor. Typically the generator speed is measured in wind turbines. From the generator speed, the rotor speed can easily be derived.



FIG. 4 schematically illustrates an aerodynamic thrust force as a function of wind speed when a wind turbine is operated according to a theoretical power curve. As may be seen in FIG. 4, the aerodynamic thrust on the rotor peaks around the nominal wind speed. In accordance with aspects of the present disclosure a plurality of thrust levels may be introduced to avoid the high peak in aerodynamic thrust and to thereby limit structural loads.


In FIG. 4, a single thrust limit TL is indicated. In accordance with aspects of the present disclosure, a plurality of thrust limits may be defined. And depending on the level of turbulence at a given moment, one of these thrust limits may be selected. The wind turbine is then operated to ensure that the aerodynamic thrust on the rotor stays below the selected thrust limit.



FIG. 5 schematically illustrates an example of determining an isoline of constant turbulence probability. In a method for defining a plurality of thrust limits for a wind turbine wherein the thrust limits define values of aerodynamic thrust on the rotor not be exceeded in operation the example of FIG. 5 may be used. A wind speed distribution representative for the site is provided. In this specific example, a wind range from 10 m/s to 20 m/s has been provided. Typically, thrust limits will act in a range of wind speeds around the nominal wind speed, e.g. from 1-3 m/s below the nominal wind speed to 1-3 m/s above the nominal wind speed.


The wind speed distribution may be obtained from wind speed measurements, e.g. using a met mast, prior to installation of the wind turbine or wind park. The wind speed distribution might also be obtained from wind speed measurements in similar sites or from computer simulation.


In FIG. 5, a plurality of isolines of constant turbulence probability is defined. The isolines represent a turbulence parameter indicative of wind speed variation as a function of wind speed. In this particular example, the turbulence parameter is the standard deviation of the wind speed with respect to a mean wind speed. In further examples, other turbulence parameters might be used, such as e.g. turbulence intensity or variance of wind speed. Turbulence intensity may be defined as standard deviation divided by mean wind speed. The standard deviation is the square root of the variance.


In this particular example moreover, the turbulence parameter is assumed to be a linear function of the wind speed.


The isolines in FIG. 5 correspond to quantile levels of probability of turbulence of the wind speed distribution. The three lines correspond to 5%, 50% and 95% quantiles. I.e. a quantile-based regression has been used. The standard deviation in this example is assumed to be a linear function of the wind speed:





σlim=aσV+bσ∈[Von,Voff]


Herein σlim is the standard deviation as a function of the wind speed V for one of the isolines. The parameters aσ and bσ are the parameters of the linear function. Von and Voff are the wind speed at the lower end and the upper end of the wind range for which the linear functions are to be determined.


Different parameters aσ and bσ may be defined for each of the isolines.


The wind speed distribution may be regarded as a collection of data points of combinations of wind speed and standard deviation thereof.


In the quantile-based regression, the cost function Jσ to be minimized for a constant quantile level is given in the following equation:








J
σ



(


a
σ

,

b
σ


)


=




V
on


V
off





(



a
σ


V

+

b
σ


)


d

V






The 95% isoline represents a confidence level of 95% that turbulence in the wind speed distribution is below the indicated level, i.e. in this example, the standard deviation of wind speed for a given wind speed is below the line.


In this particular example, a range of 10 m/s to 20 m/s was chosen, but it should be clear that different ranges of wind speed might be used. In some examples, a wind speed range may be split in smaller portions e.g. 10-12 m/s, 12-14 m/s and so on. And for each of these smaller rages quantile-based regression could be performed to find portions of an isoline. In such a case, with the above equations, an isoline may comprise several linear portions.


Once the isolines have been defined, turbulence ranges can be defined with respect to the isolines. The isolines can be defined above an isoline, below an isoline or in between isolines. One or more of the edges or ends of the turbulence ranges are thereby defined by the isolines.


In this particular example, a turbulence range may be defined below 5%, a second turbulence range extending from 5 to 95%, and a third turbulence range may be defined for turbulence above the 95% isoline. It should be clear that the values of 5, 50 and 95% are indicated merely as examples and that other values could be used. It should also be clear that more isolines (and more turbulence ranges) could be defined than in the example here.


Finally, for each of these ranges, thrust limits may be defined such that (peak) loads are maintained under a predefined acceptable level even in highly turbulent winds. On the other hand, if the wind is less turbulent, higher limits may be used because the peak loads will stay below an acceptable level.



FIG. 6 schematically illustrates an example of a method of operating a wind turbine. Once a plurality of thrust limits has been defined for different turbulence ranges as was just illustrated with reference to FIG. 5, a method for operating a wind turbine might comprise estimating a wind speed and the turbulence parameter and selecting a thrust limit based on the estimated turbulence parameter and the estimated wind speed. Then the wind turbine may be operated such that a thrust on the rotor is below the selected thrust limit.


Input for block 30 includes the parameters aσi and bσi for each of n defined isolines, wherein n is the total number of isolines, and i is the number of an individual isoline. The output of the block is one or more values of standard deviation a, for the given mean wind speed Vw. In this specific case, two standard deviation values are defined for each wind speed, σ5% and σ95%.


In operation, the wind speed V might be determined substantially continuously. Substantially continuously herein means that the wind speed is determined with sufficiently high frequency such that it can be taken into account in a meaningful manner in wind turbine operation.


A wind turbine may comprise a remote sensing system to measure wind conditions upstream of the rotor, e.g. a SODAR or LIDAR. And the control system of the wind turbine may be configured to receive the wind conditions from the remote sensing system and to determine the wind speed and turbulence impinging on the rotor based on the measurements of the wind upstream.


Alternatively, the wind turbine may comprise a nacelle anemometer, and the control system is configured to determine wind speed and turbulence based on measurements of the nacelle anemometer. I.e. the nacelle anemometer gives continuous measurements of wind speed V. For an interval (the most recent interval), a mean wind speed Vw, and a wind speed variation (in this example standard deviation σw) might be calculated from the data from the nacelle anemometer. However, it is known that the reliability of wind speed measurements using a nacelle anemometer is limited since the wind is disturbed when it reaches the anemometer.


In yet a further example, estimating a wind speed may comprise determining a power output, a pitch angle of the blades and a rotational speed of the rotor. Based on the power output, the pitch angle of the blades and the rotational speed of the rotor, wind speed may be estimated using a Kalman filter. Typically, suitable sensors and systems are provided on a wind turbine to measure power output, a pitch angle from the blades (this should be available for suitable pitch control) and the rotational speed of the rotor (typically, the speed of rotation of the generator rotor may be measured). The use of a Kalman filter has been found to be reliable to estimate wind speed.


From a time series of wind speed measurements V, the mean wind speed Vw and the turbulence parameter indicative of variation of wind speed may be derived at block 40. One of the outputs of block 40 is the chosen turbulence parameter. In this case the standard deviation □w with respect to a mean wind speed is used. The output of block 40 is provided as input to blocks 30 and 50.


Within block 50, a plurality of turbulence ranges is defined, below the lowest quantile level, above the highest quantile level and in between the quantile levels. For each of the turbulence ranges, a thrust limit is defined. In this particular example, Tmax is the highest thrust limit, Tmin is the lowest thrust limit and Tmean is the average thrust limit. When Tmin is activated, higher priority is given to maintaining loads under an acceptable level and potential electrical power output is most sacrificed.


If the turbulence level (output from block 40) and wind speed (output from block 40) are known at a given moment, then it is also known in which turbulence range the wind turbine is operating.


If that is known, the suitable thrust limit Tsel may be selected from the previously defined thrust limits at block 50. The wind turbine may then be operated to make sure that the aerodynamic thrust on the rotor stays below the selected limit.


To this end, the aerodynamic thrust on the rotor could be measured directly, e.g. using suitable strain or deformation sensors in the blades. Alternatively, the thrust on the rotor can be estimated by calculating the thrust based on the estimated wind speed, the rotational speed of the rotor and the pitch angle of the blades.


In operation, then an estimated thrust on the rotor can be compared with the selected thrust limit, and if the estimated thrust is above the selected thrust limit, a collective pitch signal may be sent (from the wind turbine control) to the blades of the rotor (or to the pitch control systems) to pitch the blades and reduce the thrust on the rotor.


In a further aspect of the present disclosure, and in accordance with the illustrated example, a wind turbine is provided. The wind turbine comprises a rotor with a plurality of blades, one or more pitch systems for rotating the blades around longitudinal axes of the blades, a generator and a control system. The control system is configured to estimate a wind speed and a turbulence, and to select a thrust level based on the turbulence and the estimated wind speed, wherein the thrust level is selected from a plurality of thrust limits for different turbulence ranges and to send signals to the pitch systems to collectively pitch the blades such that aerodynamic thrust on the rotor is below the selected thrust level. The plurality of thrust levels has been determined by quantile-based regression of a wind speed distribution of wind speed and a parameter indicative of turbulence.


In examples, a Kalman filter technique may be employed to estimate the wind speed, with the Kalman filter being fed by variables such as the power output, the blade pitch angle and the rotational speed of the rotor



FIGS. 7-9 schematically illustrate the effect of dynamic thrust levels for different wind distributions. FIGS. 7-9 illustrate different wind speed distributions for the same wind turbine at a given site. In accordance with the examples hereinbefore described, based on a specific wind speed distribution, quantile levels of turbulence probability have been defined. In FIG. 7, at the same site, the wind has relatively low turbulence intensity. In FIG. 8, the wind speed distribution is average, or substantially comparable to the theoretical wind speed distribution. Finally, in FIG. 9, a wind speed distribution that has relatively high turbulence is shown.


In the case of FIG. 7, the thrust limit that will be selected often is a high limit, prioritizing energy production. In the case of FIG. 9 however, the thrust limit that will more often be selected is a rather low limit, sacrificing power output but ensuring that loads stay under a predefined limit.


For all cases, the wind turbine may incorporate some form of control to avoid rapidly changing thrust limits. This could happen e.g. when the turbulence is close to an isoline. To avoid such rapid changes, hysteresis control may be incorporated. One way to implement such a control might be a time delay between entering a thrust range and the selection of a thrust limit. Another way to implement such a control is to have separations between turbulence ranges, and to (linearly) vary the thrust limits between the defined thrust ranges.


In one example of operation, for each of the predefined isolines, one or more check levels are defined, and wherein a thrust limit is not changed until the wind turbulence parameter reaches one of the check levels. The check levels may define small bands around the isolines.



FIGS. 10 and 11 schematically illustrate the effect of varying thrust levels on the annual energy yield and the blade root bending moments. In FIG. 10, the AEP (Annual Energy Production) of a wind turbine with three different setting in three different scenarios is illustrated. The three different settings include a single high thrust limit Tmean, a single low thrust limit Tmin, and a plurality of thrust limits Tvar. The variable thrust limits include Tmin, Tmean and a Tmax higher than Tmean as defined in accordance with examples of the present disclosure. The three scenarios include wind speed simulations with different levels of turbulence intensity, indicated with letters A, B and C. Scenario A corresponds to a scenario with relatively low or little turbulence, scenario B corresponds to “average” turbulence, whereas scenario corresponds to a highly turbulent winds.


In FIG. 11, the bending moment at the blade root for the same three settings (Tmean, Tmin, Tvar) and same three simulated scenarios (A, B and C) are shown. It may be seen in FIG. 10 that dynamically varying the thrust limits results in an increased annual energy production in the scenarios A and B. It may be seen in FIG. 11 that dynamically varying thrust limits also ensure that loads are controlled. In the most turbulent wind scenario (C), the blade root moment reaches its limit for the control with a single high thrust limit. In scenario C, the single thrust limit yields slightly higher annual energy production but at a significant cost of high loads. These high loads may result in fatigue damage which may lead to a worse performance in the future or to premature replacement or retirement of the wind turbine or its components.


Definition of thrust limits in the herein disclosed manner with quantile-based regression allows for site specific tuning based on the turbulence intensity distribution at the site of interest. Both the confidence levels (quantiles) and the thresholds can be tuned to maximize the power extraction from the wind for sites with relatively low turbulence, whereas for sites where high turbulence, a better trade-off between structural safety (in terms of loads) and power extraction can be achieved by a proper definition of the confidence levels and relative thrust thresholds.


In accordance with the herein disclosed examples, a method for operating a wind turbine including a rotor with a plurality of blades has been disclosed. The method may comprise determining a time series of wind speeds and deriving a mean wind speed and a turbulence parameter indicating variability of the wind speed from the time series. Then, a thrust limit may be selected from a plurality of thrust limits based on the derived turbulence parameter and wind speed. Based on the selected thrust limit, the wind turbine may be operated to ensure that a thrust on the rotor is below the selected thrust limit.


The plurality of thrust limits may be defined for ranges of the turbulence parameter for each possible wind speed (within a wind speed range). And the ranges of the turbulence parameter at mean wind speed are defined by confidence intervals that the turbulence parameter for the mean wind speed is below a given value in wind data representative for a location of the wind turbine.


In some examples, the wind data representative for a location of the wind turbine includes data for a band of wind speeds including a nominal wind speed of the wind turbine. It is for wind speeds around the nominal wind speed that the aerodynamic thrust on the rotor and the corresponding loads can be high. For wind speeds close to a cut-in wind speed, and wind speeds that are significantly higher than the nominal wind speed that the aerodynamic thrust is relatively low. In the former case, this is because the energy of the wind is low and in the latter case, this is because the blades of the wind turbine have already been pitched to sufficiently high pitch angles to keep the rotor torque at nominal level. The wind speeds close to a cut-in wind speed and close to cut-out wind speed, or significantly higher than a nominal wind speed may be safely excluded from such a probability analysis.


This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the preferred embodiments, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims. Aspects from the various embodiments described, as well as other known equivalents for each such aspects, can be mixed and matched by one of ordinary skill in the art to construct additional embodiments and techniques in accordance with principles of this application. If reference signs related to drawings are placed in parentheses in a claim, they are solely for attempting to increase the intelligibility of the claim, and shall not be construed as limiting the scope of the claim.

Claims
  • 1. A method for operating a wind turbine using a plurality of thrust limits, the wind turbine having a rotor with a plurality of rotor blades and being located at a site, wherein the plurality of thrust limits define values of aerodynamic thrust on the rotor not to be exceeded in operation, the method comprising: providing a wind speed distribution representative for the site;defining one or more isolines of constant turbulence probability representing a turbulence parameter as a function of wind speed, wherein the one or more isolines correspond to quantile levels of turbulence of the wind speed distribution and the turbulence parameter is indicative of wind speed variation;defining turbulence ranges with respect to the one or more isolines; anddefining the plurality of thrust limits for the turbulence ranges;selecting a thrust limit from the plurality of thrust limits; andoperating the wind turbine such that a thrust on the rotor is below the selected thrust limit.
  • 2-15. (canceled)
  • 16. The method of claim 1, wherein the turbulence parameter indicative of the wind speed variation is a standard deviation of a wind speed with respect to a mean value of the wind speed in a time interval.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the one or more isolines define the standard deviation as a linear function of the wind speed within a wind speed range.
  • 18. The method of claim 1, wherein the wind speed distribution for the site is based on wind measurements at a site of the wind turbine.
  • 19. The method of claim 1, further comprising: determining a wind speed and the turbulence parameter;selecting the thrust limit from the plurality of thrust limits based on the determined turbulence parameter and the determined wind speed; andoperating the wind turbine such that the thrust on the rotor is below the selected thrust limit.
  • 20. The method of claim 19, wherein determining the wind speed further comprises: determining a power output;determining a pitch angle of one or more of the plurality of rotor blades;determining a rotational speed of the rotor; andestimating the wind speed based on the power output, the pitch angle of the blades and the rotational speed of the rotor using a Kalman filter.
  • 21. The method of claim 20, further comprising estimating the thrust on the rotor, wherein estimating the thrust on the rotor comprises calculating the thrust on the rotor based on the estimated wind speed, the rotational speed of the rotor and the pitch angle of the blades.
  • 22. The method of claim 1, wherein operating the wind turbine such that the thrust on the rotor is below the predetermined thrust limit further comprises: comparing the thrust on the rotor with the selected thrust limit, andif the thrust is above the selected thrust limit, sending a collective pitch signal to the blades of the rotor to pitch the blades and reduce the thrust on the rotor.
  • 23. The method of claim 1, further comprising defining one or more check levels for the one or more isolines, wherein the thrust limit is not changed until the turbulence parameter reaches one of the one or more check levels.
  • 24. A wind turbine, comprising: a rotor with a plurality of rotor blades;one or more pitch systems for rotating the plurality of rotor blades around longitudinal axes thereof;a generator; anda control system configured to perform a plurality of operations, the plurality of operations comprising: determining a wind speed and a turbulence;selecting a thrust level based on the turbulence and the wind speed, wherein the thrust level is selected from a plurality of thrust limits for different turbulence ranges; andsending signals to the one or more pitch systems to collectively pitch the plurality of rotor blades such that aerodynamic thrust on the rotor is below the selected thrust level, wherein the plurality of thrust levels are determined by quantile-based regression of a wind speed distribution of wind speed and a parameter indicative of turbulence.
  • 25. The wind turbine of claim 24, wherein the plurality of operations further comprise: determining a speed of the rotor;determining pitch angles of the plurality of rotor blades;determining a power output of the generator; andestimating a wind speed based on the speed of the rotor, the pitch angles of the plurality or rotor blades and the power output of the generator.
  • 26. The wind turbine of claim 25, wherein the plurality of operations further comprise estimating the turbulence based on a variation of the wind speed.
  • 27. The wind turbine of claim 24, further comprising a remote sensing system to measure wind conditions upstream of the rotor, the plurality of operations further comprising receiving the wind conditions from the remote sensing system and determining the wind speed and the turbulence.
  • 28. The wind turbine of claim 24, further comprising a nacelle anemometer, the plurality of operations further comprising determining the wind speed and the turbulence based on measurements of the nacelle anemometer.
  • 29. The wind turbine of claim 24, wherein the parameter indicative of wind speed variation is a standard deviation of the wind speed with respect to a mean wind speed in a time interval.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
19160638.3 Mar 2019 EP regional