1. Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to orthopaedic prostheses and, specifically, to articular tibial components in a knee prosthesis.
2. Description of the Related Art
Orthopaedic prostheses are commonly utilized to repair and/or replace damaged bone and tissue in the human body. For a damaged knee, a knee prosthesis may be implanted using a tibial baseplate, a tibial bearing component, and a distal femoral component. The tibial baseplate is affixed to a proximal end of the patient's tibia, which is typically resected to accept the baseplate. The femoral component is implanted on a distal end of the patient's femur, which is also typically resected to accept the femoral component. The tibial bearing component is placed between the tibial baseplate and femoral component, and may be fixed upon or slidably coupled to the tibial baseplate.
The tibial bearing component, which may also be referred to as a tibial insert or meniscal component, provides an articular surface which interacts with the adjacent femur or femoral component during extension and flexion of the knee.
Prior art tibial bearing components have included anterior relief spaces which are at least partially concave along their medial/lateral extents (i.e., as viewed from a coronal/transverse perspective), and at least partially convex as viewed from a sagittal perspective. However, these prior art anterior relief spaces have not been convex across the entire anterior/posterior span, instead having one or more flat expanses of material in the anterior relief space. Further, as a result of these flat expanses of material, the radii defined by the sagittally convex portions of the prior art anterior relief spaces are substantially less than 5 mm.
The features and geometry of the articular surface influences the interaction with the tibial bearing component and the surrounding soft tissues after implantation. Substantial design efforts have previously focused on providing knee prosthesis components which protect the natural tissues of the knee during the in vivo use of the components.
The present disclosure provides an orthopaedic knee prosthesis including a tibial bearing component with surface features which operate to protect adjacent soft tissues of the natural knee throughout a wide range of flexion. More particularly, the tibial bearing component provides an anterior relief space disposed between the dished lateral and medial articular compartments, in which the relief space is convex as viewed from a sagittal perspective across the medial/lateral extent of the relief space.
According to one embodiment thereof, the present invention provides a tibial bearing component for articulation with femoral condyles, the tibial bearing component defining a tibial bearing component coordinate system comprising: a bearing component transverse plane extending along a medial/lateral direction and an anterior/posterior direction; a bearing component coronal plane extending along a proximal/distal direction and the medial/lateral direction, the bearing component coronal plane perpendicular to the bearing component transverse plane; and a bearing component sagittal plane extending along the anterior/posterior direction and the proximal/distal direction, the bearing component sagittal plane perpendicular to the bearing component transverse plane and the bearing component coronal plane, the tibial bearing component comprising: an articular surface and an opposing distal surface, the distal surface parallel to the bearing component transverse plane, the articular surface including medial and lateral dished articular compartments sized and shaped for articulation with the femoral condyles, the medial and lateral dished articular compartments separated from one another by the bearing component sagittal plane, the articular and distal surfaces bounded by a tibial bearing periphery, an anterior relief space situated at a medial/lateral location between the medial and lateral dished articular surfaces to define a medial/lateral span, the anterior relief space situated adjacent to an anterior edge of the tibial bearing periphery and extending posteriorly from the anterior edge across an anterior/posterior span, the medial/lateral span of the anterior relief space comprising a plurality of sagittal cross-sectional profiles each extending from a posterior edge of the anterior relief space to an anterior edge of the anterior relief space, each of the plurality of sagittal cross-sectional profiles defining a convex sagittal curve extending from the posterior edge to the anterior edge of the anterior relief space.
According to another embodiment thereof, the present invention provides a tibial bearing component for articulation with femoral condyles, the tibial bearing component defining a tibial bearing component coordinate system comprising: a bearing component transverse plane extending along a medial/lateral direction and an anterior/posterior direction; a bearing component coronal plane extending along a proximal/distal direction and the medial/lateral direction, the bearing component coronal plane perpendicular to the bearing component transverse plane; and a bearing component sagittal plane extending along the anterior/posterior direction and the proximal/distal direction, the bearing component sagittal plane perpendicular to the bearing component transverse plane and the bearing component coronal plane, the tibial bearing component comprising: an articular surface and an opposing distal surface, the distal surface parallel to the bearing component transverse plane, the articular surface including medial and lateral dished articular compartments sized and shaped for articulation with the femoral condyles, the medial and lateral dished articular compartments separated from one another by the bearing component sagittal plane, the articular and distal surfaces bounded by a tibial bearing periphery, an anterior relief space situated at a medial/lateral location between the medial and lateral dished articular surfaces to define a medial/lateral span, the anterior relief space situated adjacent to an anterior edge of the tibial bearing periphery and extending posteriorly from the anterior edge across an anterior/posterior span, the medial/lateral span of the anterior relief space comprising a plurality of sagittal cross-sectional profiles, each of the plurality of sagittal cross-sectional profiles defining a convex sagittal curve defining a sagittal curve radius of at least 5 mm.
The above mentioned and other features and advantages of this disclosure, and the manner of attaining them, will become more apparent and the invention itself will be better understood by reference to the following description of embodiments of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views. The exemplifications set out herein illustrate exemplary embodiments of the invention, and such exemplifications are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any manner.
The present disclosure provides tibial bearing components for a knee prosthesis in which the bearing components have a rounded, sagittally convex anterior relief space which functions to protect soft tissues during knee articulation.
As used herein, “proximal” refers to a direction generally toward the torso of a patient, and “distal” refers to the opposite direction of proximal, i.e., away from the torso of a patient. “Anterior” refers to a direction generally toward the front of a patient or knee, and “posterior” refers to the opposite direction of anterior, i.e., toward the back of the patient or knee. In the context of a prosthesis alone, such directions generally correspond to the orientation of the prosthesis after implantation, such that a proximal portion of the prosthesis is that portion which will ordinarily be closest to the torso of the patient, the anterior portion closest to the front of the patient's knee, etc.
Similarly, knee prostheses in accordance with the present disclosure may be referred to in the context of a coordinate system including transverse, coronal and sagittal planes of the component. Upon implantation of the prosthesis and with a patient in a standing position, a transverse plane of the knee prosthesis is generally parallel to an anatomic transverse plane, i.e., the transverse plane of the knee prosthesis is inclusive of imaginary vectors extending along medial/lateral and anterior/posterior directions. However, in some instances the bearing component transverse plane will be slightly angled with respect to the anatomic transverse plane, such as when the proximal surface of the resected tibia T (
Coronal and sagittal planes of the knee prosthesis are also generally parallel to the coronal and sagittal anatomic planes in a similar fashion. Thus, a coronal plane of the prosthesis is inclusive of vectors extending along proximal/distal and medial/lateral directions, and a sagittal plane is inclusive of vectors extending along anterior/posterior and proximal/distal directions. As with the relationship between the anatomic and bearing component transverse planes discussed above, it is appreciated that small angles may be formed between the bearing component sagittal and coronal planes and the corresponding anatomic sagittal and coronal planes depending upon the surgical implantation method. For example, creation of an anteroposterior slope defined by resected surface S of tibia T (
As with anatomic planes, the sagittal, coronal and transverse planes defined by the knee prosthesis are mutually perpendicular to one another. For purposes of the present disclosure, reference to sagittal, coronal and transverse planes is with respect to the present knee prosthesis unless otherwise specified.
The embodiments shown and described herein illustrate components for a left knee prosthesis. Right and left knee prosthesis configurations are mirror images of one another about a sagittal plane. Thus, it will be appreciated that the aspects of the prosthesis described herein are equally applicable to a left or right knee configuration.
In one exemplary embodiment shown in
Tibial bearing component 212 may also take the form of an “ultra congruent” (UC) design, which utilizes very high congruence between the tibial bearing compartments and femoral condyles to provide prosthesis stability, particularly with respect to anterior/posterior relative motion. This high congruence allows UC designs to be used for patients whose PCL is resected.
“Congruence,” in the context of knee prostheses, sometimes also referred to as conformity, refers to the similarity of curvature between the convex femoral condyles and the correspondingly concave tibial articular compartments. A convex surface may be considered to be highly conforming with a corresponding concave surface where the two surfaces have similar or identical convex and concave geometries, such that the convex surface “nests” or tightly interfits with the concave surface. For example, a hemisphere having a radius perfectly conforms (i.e., defines high conformity) with a corresponding hemispherical cavity having the same radius. Conversely, the hemisphere would have low conformity with an adjacent flat or convex surface.
For both CR and UC prosthesis designs, femoral component 220 (
It is also contemplated that prosthesis designs in accordance with the present disclosure may include posterior stabilized (PS) prostheses and mid level constraint (MLC) prostheses, each of which includes tibial component 12 having spine 38 (
Tibial bearing components 12, 212 include anterior relief spaces 61, 261, respectively, which are sagittally convex and therefore operate to protect and accommodate soft tissues of the knee during flexion, as described in detail below.
For simplicity, a cruciate-retaining (CR) type tibial bearing component 212 is shown in
Bearing component 212 includes medial articular compartment 216 and lateral articular compartment 218, each defining concave dished articular surfaces sized and shaped to articulate with medial and lateral femoral condyles 222, 224, respectively, of femoral component 220 (
For purposes of the present disclosure, a central sagittal plane may be said to bisect tibial bearing component 12 into a medial portion including medial articular compartment 16 and a lateral portion including lateral compartment 18.
During articulation from knee extension to flexion, the contact point between femoral condyles 222, 224 and articular compartments 216, 218 moves posteriorly, thereby defining medial articular track 226 and lateral articular track 228, respectively as shown in
Anterior relief space 261 is disposed at a generally anterior and central location on the proximal articular surface of tibial bearing component 212. Thus, relief space is positioned between medial and lateral articular compartments 216, 218, and between the anterior end of intercompartmental ridge 238 and the anterior peripheral edge of tibial bearing component 212.
Anterior relief space 261 defines sagittal convexity across its medial/lateral span, thereby accommodating soft tissues of the knee which may come into contact with this area during articulation of the knee prosthesis. The medial/lateral span may vary as required or desired for a particular application. In the illustrative embodiments of
Turning to
Turning now to
The medial/lateral positioning of central profile 264 may coincide with the largest anterior/posterior extent of anterior relief space 261, such that the entirety of the anterior/posterior extent of relief space 261 is equal to anterior/posterior extent APS at central profile 264, as shown in
In the above-mentioned exemplary family of nominal tibial prosthesis sizes, radii R1, R2 and R3 are variable in proportion to the nominal prosthesis size. Thus, small prosthesis sizes define relatively smaller values for radii R1, R2 and R3 respectively, and larger sizes define larger values for radii R1, R2 and R3 respectively.
Medial, central and lateral profiles 262, 264, 266 have been chosen to illustrate the sagittal convexity of anterior relief space 261 at three discrete but representative medial/lateral cross-sections. However, it should be appreciated that each and every cross-section taken through anterior relief space 261 at any location along the medial/lateral extent of anterior relief space 261 would reveal similarly convex sagittal curvature profiles. Advantageously, this sagittal convexity presents a “soft” and rounded surface curvature which minimizes abrasive forces on adjacent soft tissues. In this way, anterior relief space 261 may be said to be “soft tissue friendly”.
Turning to the coronal/transverse perspective of
As noted above, anterior relief space 261 is illustrated as part of cruciate-retaining or ultra-congruent tibial bearing component 212, but may also be included in posterior-stabilized bearing component designs.
Tibial bearing component 12 includes spine 38 disposed between medial and lateral articular compartments 16, 18 in place of intercompartmental ridge 238. Spine 38 includes posterior surface 48 which is shaped to articulate with posterior cam 40 of femoral component 20 (
Anterior relief space 61 (
In the exemplary embodiment described herein, tibial bearing components 12, 212 fixedly attach to tibial baseplate 14 (
Once such fixed engagement takes place, tibial bearing component 212 (or 12) is immovable with respect to tibial baseplate 14. As used herein, a “fixed bearing” tibial prosthesis is a prosthesis in which a bearing component is seated atop a tibial baseplate in a final, locked position such as the arrangement described above. In this locked position, lift-off of bearing components 12, 212 from tibial baseplate 14, as well as transverse movement of bearing components 12, 212 relative to tibial baseplate 14, is prevented during natural articulation of the knee. While some very small amount of motion (sometimes referred to as micromotion) may occur between tibial bearing components 12, 212 and tibial baseplate 14 in a fixed bearing prosthesis, no such motion occurs by design along a designated path.
Other types of fixed bearing prostheses include “monoblock” type designs, in which the tibial bearing component is permanently molded over the tibial baseplate to create a unitary tibial prosthesis. However, it is also contemplated that an anterior relief space in accordance with the present disclosure may be used on a “mobile bearing” prosthesis design in which the tibial bearing component is allowed to move relative to the tibial baseplate during articulation.
In order to prepare tibia T and femur F (
While the present disclosure has been described as having exemplary designs, the present disclosure can be further modified within the spirit and scope of this disclosure. This application is therefore intended to cover any variations, uses or adaptations of the disclosure using its general principles. Further, this application is intended to cover such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which this disclosure pertains.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/459,037, filed Apr. 27, 2012, which claims the benefit under Title 35, U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/561,657 filed Nov. 18, 2011, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/577,293 filed Dec. 19, 2011, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/592,576 filed Jan. 30, 2012, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/621,361 filed Apr. 6, 2012, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/621,363 filed Apr. 6, 2012, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/621,364 filed Apr. 6, 2012, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/621,366 filed Apr. 6, 2012, each entitled TIBIAL BEARING COMPONENT FOR A KNEE PROSTHESIS WITH IMPROVED ARTICULAR CHARACTERISTICS, the entire disclosures of which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5047057 | Lawes | Sep 1991 | A |
5059216 | Winters | Oct 1991 | A |
5171283 | Pappas et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5192328 | Winters | Mar 1993 | A |
5219362 | Tuke et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5282870 | Moser et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5387240 | Pottenger et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5413604 | Hodge | May 1995 | A |
5609639 | Walker | Mar 1997 | A |
5609643 | Colleran et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5658342 | Draganich et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
6013103 | Kaufman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6068658 | Insall et al. | May 2000 | A |
6080195 | Colleran et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6102954 | Albrektsson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6123729 | Insall et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6203576 | Afriat et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210443 | Marceaux et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6325828 | Dennis et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6406497 | Takei et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6428577 | Evans | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6491726 | Pappas | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6558426 | Masini | May 2003 | B1 |
6660039 | Pothier et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
7081137 | Servidio | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7160330 | Axelson, Jr. et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7261740 | Tuttle | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7264635 | Suguro | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7309362 | Yasuda et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7326252 | Otto et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7351263 | Afriat | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7413577 | Servidio | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7625407 | Akizuki | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7635390 | Bonutti | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7678152 | Suguro et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7776085 | Bernero et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8690954 | Parisi et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8764838 | Parisi et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8858643 | Parisi et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9072607 | Parisi et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
20040243244 | Otto et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050055102 | Tornier et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050096747 | Tuttle et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050197710 | Naegerl | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209701 | Suguro et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060004460 | Engh et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060265080 | Mcminn | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070185581 | Akizuki et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070233269 | Steines et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080119940 | Otto et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080161918 | Fankhauser et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080243258 | Sancheti | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080288080 | Sancheti | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300689 | Mc Kinnon et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080300690 | Burstein et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090043395 | Hotokebuchi et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090210066 | Jasty | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222103 | Fitz et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090265011 | Mandell | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265013 | Mandell | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090319047 | Walker | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319048 | Shah et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319049 | Shah et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326663 | Dun | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326665 | Wyss et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326666 | Wyss et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326668 | Dun | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100016976 | Siebel | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016979 | Wyss et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100036499 | Pinskerova | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100036500 | Heldreth et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100191341 | Byrd | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100262253 | Cipolletti et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100286788 | Komistek | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100305708 | Lang | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100329530 | Lang et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110022179 | Andriacchi et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110029091 | Bojarski et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110082558 | Kim et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110125278 | Bercovy et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110144760 | Wong et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110251695 | Lenz et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120185054 | Maloney et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130131816 | Parisi et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130131817 | Parisi et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130131818 | Parisi et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130131819 | Parisi et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20140163687 | Parisi et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140257505 | Parisi et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101214175 | Jul 2008 | CN |
104066402 | Sep 2014 | CN |
0636353 | Feb 1995 | EP |
0592750 | Jan 1999 | EP |
1025818 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1378216 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1477143 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1568336 | Aug 2005 | EP |
1719478 | Nov 2006 | EP |
1722721 | Nov 2006 | EP |
1354571 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1604623 | Jun 2008 | EP |
0927009 | Jan 2009 | EP |
1696835 | Feb 2009 | EP |
1591082 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2140838 | Jan 2010 | EP |
2143403 | Jan 2010 | EP |
1555962 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2324799 | May 2011 | EP |
2335654 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2852819 | Oct 2004 | FR |
2004166802 | Jun 2004 | JP |
WO-9514446 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO-2004058108 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO-2005051240 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO-2005122967 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO-2006058057 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO-2006092167 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO-2007109641 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO-2009088235 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO-2009088236 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO-2009088238 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO-2009105495 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO-2010001010 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO-2011072235 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO-2012112698 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO-2013074142 | May 2013 | WO |
WO-2013074143 | May 2013 | WO |
WO-2013074144 | May 2013 | WO |
WO-2013074145 | May 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,037, Final Office Action mailed Sep. 23, 2013”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,037, Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 23, 2013”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,037, Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 13, 2014”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,037, Preliminary Amendment filed Apr. 27, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,037, Response filed Mar. 21, 2014 to Final Office Action mailed Sep. 23, 2013”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,037, Response filed Mar. 28, 2013 to Restriction Requirement mailed Feb. 26, 2013”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,037, Response filed Jul. 23, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 23, 2013”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,037, Restriction Requirement mailed Feb. 26, 2013”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,041, Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 15, 2014”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,041, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 9, 2014”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,041, Preliminary Amendment mailed Apr. 27, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,041, Response filed May 15, 2014 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Jan. 15, 2014”, 24 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,041, Response filed Sep. 23, 2013 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jul. 25, 2013”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,041, Restriction Requirement mailed Jul. 25, 2013”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,048, Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 11, 2013”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,048, Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 26, 2013”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,048, Preliminary Amendment filed Apr. 27, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,048, Response filed Nov. 11, 2013 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Jul. 11, 2013”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,056, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Dec. 26, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,056, Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 25, 2013”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,056, Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 20, 2014”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,056, Preliminary Amendment filed Apr. 27, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,056, PTO Response to Rule 312 Communication mailed May 22, 2014”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,056, Response filed Jan. 24, 2014 to Non-Final office Action mailed Jul. 25, 2013”, 27 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,056, Response filed Apr. 8, 2013 to Restriction Requirement mailed Mar. 6, 2013”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,056, Restriction Requirement mailed Mar. 6, 2013”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/284,028, Supplemental Preliminary Amendment filed Jul. 8, 2014”, 13 pgs. |
“Bi-Cruciate Stabilized Knee System”, Design Rationale, Smith & Nephew Journal, (2006), 20 pgs. |
“Extramedullary/Intramedullary Tibial Resector: Surgical Technique”, Nexgen Complete Knee Solution, Zimmer, Inc. 97/5997-02 Rev 1, (2000, 2002), 25 pgs. |
“Gender Solutions Natural Knee Flex System: Because Men and Women are Different”, Zimmer, Inc., (2007, 2009), 6 pg. |
“Gender Solutions Natural Knee Flex System: Surgical Technique”, Zimmer, Inc., (2007, 2008, 2009), 36 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/035679, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed May 30, 2014”, 8 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/035679, International Search Report mailed Jun. 8, 2012”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/035679, Written Opinion mailed Jun. 8, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/035680, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed May 30, 2014”, 13 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/035680, Search Report mailed Oct. 9, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/035680, Written Opinion mailed Oct. 9, 2012”, 11 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/035683, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed May 30, 2014”, 9 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/035683, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jun. 5, 2012”, 12 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/035684, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed May 30, 2014”, 14 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/035684, International Search Report mailed Aug. 8, 2012”, 9 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/035684, Written Opinion mailed Jun. 8, 2012”, 12 pgs. |
“LPS-Flex Fixed Bearing Knee: Surgical Technique”, Zimmer, Inc., (2004, 2007, 2008), 16 pgs. |
“Natural-Knee II Primary System Surgical Technique”, Zimmer, Inc., (2005), 48 pgs. |
“Surgical Technique for the CR-Flex Fixed Bearing Knee”, NexGen Complete Knee Solution, Zimmer, Inc., (2003), 22 pgs. |
Hofmann, Aaron A, et al., “Posterior Stabilization in Total Knee Arthroplasty with Use of an Ultracongruent Polyethlene”, The Journal of Arthroplasty vol. 15, No. 5, (200), 576-583. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,041, Response filed Dec. 9, 2014 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 9, 2014”, 23 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/181,033, Notice of Allowance mailed Jul. 17, 2015”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/284,028, Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 7, 2015”, 17 pgs. |
“Canadian Application Serial No. 2,856,070, Preliminary Amendment filed May 25, 2015”, 27 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,041, Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 2, 2015”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,041, PTO Response to Rule 312 Communication mailed Jun. 9, 2015”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/181,033, Non Final Office Action mailed May 1, 2015”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/181.033, Response filed Jun. 22, 2015 to Non-Final Office Action mailed May 1, 2015”, 11 pgs. |
“Complete Knee Solution Surgical Technique for the CR-Flex Fixed Bearing Knee”, Zimmer Nexgen, (2003), 22 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 12718882.9 Response filed Feb. 10, 2015 to Communication Pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC mailed Jul. 31, 2014”, 11 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 12718883.7 Response filed Feb. 10, 2015 to Communication Pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC mailed Jul. 30, 2014”, 16 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 12719236.7 Response filed Feb. 9, 2015 to Communication Pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC mailed Jul. 30, 2014”, 10 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 12720352.9 Response filed Feb. 9, 2015 to Communication Pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC mailed Jul. 30, 2014”, 10 pgs. |
“Legacy Implant Options”, Nexgen Complete Knee Solution, (2002), 8 pgs. |
“MIS Minimally Invasive Solution, the M/G Unicompartmental Knee Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique”, Zimmer, Inc. Nexgen Complete Knee Solution, 97-5791-02, (Aug. 14, 2008), 27 pgs. |
“NexGen Implant Options Surgeon-Specific”, Zimmer Inc., (2000), 16 pgs. |
“NexGen Trabecular Metal Modular Plates”, Zimmer Inc., (2007), 19 pgs. |
“Primary/Revision Surgical Technique for NexGen Rotating Hinge Knee (RHK)”, Zimmer, Inc. Nexgen Complete Knee Solution, 97/5880-02, (2002), 116 pgs. |
“Revision Instrumentation Surgical Technique for Legacy Knee Constrained Condylar Knee”, Zimmer, Inc. Nexgen Complete Knee Solution, 97-5994-202, (2001), 61 pgs. |
“Surgical Technique for Cruciate Retaining Knees and Revision Instrumentation Surgical Technique for Cruciate Retaining Augmentable Knees”, Zimmer, Inc. Nexgen Complete Knee Solution, 97-5970-202, (2002), 130 pgs. |
“Surgical Technique for the Legacy Posterior Stabilized Knees”, Zimmer, Inc. Nexgen Complete Knee Solution, 97-5996-02, (2002), 43 pgs. |
“The Zimmer Institute Surgical Technique MIS Quad-Sparing Surgical Technique for Total Knee Arthroplasty”, NExGen Complete Knee Solution, (2004). |
“Zimmer MIS Intramedullary Instrumentation Surgical Technique for NexGen Cruciate Retaining & NexGen Legacy Posterior Stabilized Knees”, printed 2005, 2009, Zimmer, Inc., (2009), 45 pgs. |
“Zimmer Nexgen Cruciate Retaining (CR) and Legacy Knee Posterior Stabilized (LPS) Trabecular Metal Monoblock Tibias”, Zimmer, Inc Surgical Technique Addendum, 97-7253-34, Rev. 3, (2004), 11 pgs. |
“Zimmer NexGen LCCK Surgical Technique for use with LCCK 4-in-1 Instrumentation”, Zimmer, Inc.; copyright 2009, 2010, 2011, (May 2011), 52 pgs. |
“Zimmer NexGen MIS Tibial Component Cemented Surgical Technique”, Zimmer, Inc, #97-5950-002-00 Rev.1 1.5ML, (2005), 14 pgs. |
“Zimmer NexGen Trabecular Metal Augments Surgical Technique for LCCK & Rotating Hing Knee Trabecular Metal Augments”, Zimmer, Inc. 97-5448-02, Rev. 1, (2004), 6 pgs. |
“Zimmer NexGen Trabecular Metal Primary Patella Surgical Technique”, Zimmer. Inc., 97-7255-112-00, (2005), 10 pgs. |
“Zimmer Patient Specific Instruments”, Surgical Techniques for NexGen Complete Knee Solution Zimmer, Inc., (2010), 16 pgs. |
Partovi, Hamid, “Flow-Through Latch and Edge-Triggered Flip-Flop Hybrid Elements”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Digest of Technical Papers and Slide Supplement, NexGen Inc., Milpitas, CA, (1996), 40 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150005890 A1 | Jan 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61621366 | Apr 2012 | US | |
61621364 | Apr 2012 | US | |
61621363 | Apr 2012 | US | |
61621361 | Apr 2012 | US | |
61592576 | Jan 2012 | US | |
61577293 | Dec 2011 | US | |
61561657 | Nov 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13459037 | Apr 2012 | US |
Child | 14490153 | US |