This invention generally relates to elevator systems. More particularly, this invention relates to a unique arrangement for maintaining traction and control within an elevator system.
There are a variety of modern elevator systems. One common arrangement includes a cab and a counterweight suspended by a rope or belt. A machine causes the rope or belt to move along at least one sheave to cause a desired movement of the cab between landings within a hoistway, for example. In a typical arrangement, as the cab moves up, the counterweight moves down and vise versa.
The weight associated with the counterweight and cab typically cause tension on the rope or belt sufficient to maintain traction between the belt and the sheave that causes the desired elevator cab movement. There are situations, however, where tie-down compensation is desirable to maintain adequate rope traction. Lightweight cars and counterweights, while having other advantages, are more susceptible to the effects of shifting rope weight as the car moves through the hoistway, which can reduce traction.
Tie-down compensation arrangements limit potential “counterweight jump,” which may otherwise occur as the cab moves rapidly downward and then stops. Under such circumstances the inertia associated with the upward movement of the counterweight can cause the counterweight to continue moving upward even though the cab has stopped moving downward. Such upward movement of the counterweight introduces slack into the rope until the counterweight subsequently falls to the point where the rope is again under tension. Such counterweight jump is undesirable for obvious reasons.
Typical compensation arrangements include chains, free rope and the systems having a large, moveable mass in the hoistway pit, each of which can provide tension for certain elevator system designs. While such arrangements have been useful, they are not without shortcomings and drawbacks. The significant drawback associated with conventional tie-down compensation arrangements is that they require a relatively large pit depth at the bottom of a hoistway. Modern building practices and associated economies favor shallower pit depth. In some instances, the depth required to use a conventional tie-down compensation arrangement exceeds that which is available. In some circumstances, the option of not using tie-down compensation is chosen if it is not required by a corresponding code, for example. Without such compensation, however, there is an increased likelihood that counterweight jump will occur.
Higher rise buildings further complicate the situation. For example, buildings that have a rise above 400 feet typically are not compatible with a chain compensation arrangement. However, the available pit depth often does not accommodate a free rope or moveable mass-based compensation arrangement. Using chain or free-rope compensation arrangements in such buildings can leave open the possibility for counterweight jump.
There is a need for an improved tensioning assembly that ensures appropriate traction for moving the elevator cab and minimizes or avoids counterweight jump. This invention addresses that need while avoiding the shortcomings and drawbacks of previous systems. The inventive arrangement is capable of fitting within a much smaller pit compared to the pit depth required for the previous approaches.
In general terms, this invention is an assembly that maintains appropriate tension on a load bearing rope or belt within an elevator system and minimizes the possibility for counterweight jump.
One example system designed according to this invention includes an elevator cab and a counterweight. A load bearing member is associated with the cab and counterweight. A tension member extends between the cab and the counterweight. A base module has at least one sheave that rotates about an axis that remains fixed beneath the lowest position of the cab. The tension member at least partially wraps around the sheave.
Another example system includes a damper supported for movement with the cab or the counterweight. The damper absorbs energy that otherwise would cause counterweight jump.
The various features and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the currently preferred embodiment. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.
a schematically illustrates an embodiment designed according to the embodiment of
b schematically illustrates an alternative embodiment designed according to the embodiment of
c schematically illustrates another alternative embodiment designed according to the embodiment of
The illustrated example includes a tension and compensation arrangement 40. An elongated tension member 42 extends between the cab 22 and the counterweight 26. In one example, the tension member 42 comprises at least one steel-core, rubber coated belt. In one example, the belt has a width of 30 mm and is 9.4 mm thick. This example tension member 42 is significantly different than a rope or chain used in conventional compensating arrangements. As can be appreciated from
One end of the tension member 42 in this example is secured to a selected portion of the cab frame 24 using a termination 44. In one example, the termination 44 comprises a taluret style ending secured to a selected plank of the cab frame 24. A variety of terminations to secure the tension member to the cab frame 24 may be used. Those skilled in the art who have the benefit of this description will be able to select a termination arrangement that meets their particular needs. The tension member 42 at least partially wraps around sheaves 46 that are part of a base module 48. In the example embodiment of
In one example, the sheaves 46 are made from plastic and are grooved to accommodate the desired number and configuration of the belts used for the tension member 42. In one example, the sheaves 46 are 178 mm wide and each accommodates three tension member belts. In this example, the sheaves have a diameter of 320 mm. An advantage to using such a sheave is that it is relatively lightweight and provides design flexibility in customizing the groove designs on the sheave.
The tension member 42 extending beneath (according to the drawings) the cab 22 and counterweight 26 insures that appropriate tension remains on the load bearing member 30 to provide the desired traction within the elevator system. Further, the arrangement 40 minimizes the possibility for counterweight jump and, in most circumstances, eliminates counterweight jump.
The illustrated example also includes a cab damper 54 and a counterweight damper 56, which are schematically shown and operate in a conventional manner.
Referring now to
The air springs 60 are supported between a stationary plank 62 and a moveable plank 64. The plank 62 remains fixed relative to the counterweight frame 28. The plank 64 is slidable within grooves 66 formed on vertical members 68 of the counterweight frame 28. In one example, the grooves 66 and the air springs 60 accommodate a maximum stroke or movement of 5.7 inches. In one example, the air springs 60 have a load range between 1,600 and 2,500 pounds with a maximum capacity of 2,750.
The tension member belts 42 include terminations 70 that are secured to thimble rods 72. Springs 74 are associated with opposite ends of the thimble rods 72 and are received against a side of the plank 64 opposite from the air springs 60. The springs 74 bias the ends of the thimble rods away from the plank 64. The ends of the thimble rods 72 and the springs 74 in this example are received in a space between the plank 64 and the stationary plank 76, which provides a support for the fillers 78 provided to achieve the desired mass of the counterweight 26.
During normal elevator operation, the tension member 42 is kept under tension, in part, by the bias of the springs 74. One function of the springs 74 is to accommodate any belt stretch in the tension member 42 during the service life of the elevator system.
Under some circumstances, such as when the cab 22 moves downward relatively quickly then stops, the springs 74 dampen an initial tendency of the counterweight 26 to continue moving upward even though the cab 22 has stopped moving downward. Once the bias of the springs 74 is overcome and the springs 74 are compressed a desired amount, the air springs 60 are compressed allowing the plank 64 to move downward (according to the drawing) toward the plank 62. Depending on a particular elevator system configuration, those skilled in the art who have the benefit of this description will be able to select appropriate springs 74 and appropriate air springs 60 to achieve the desired damping effect to meet the needs of their particular situation. The compression of the springs 74 followed by the compression of the air springs 60 operates to absorb the energy that otherwise would tend to cause counterweight jump. The air springs 60 also absorb the additional load on the tension member 42 under such circumstances.
b shows another example embodiment where pressurized actuators 80 are supported between the moveable plank 64 and the stationary plank 62 in place of the air springs 60 of the embodiment of
The actuators 80 operate in the same manner as the air springs 60 in that they compress to absorb the energy that otherwise would cause counterweight jump under appropriate circumstances.
c shows another example embodiment where the damper 50 includes mechanical springs 82 in place of the air springs 60 or the actuators 80 from the two previous examples. The mechanical springs 82 operate in the same general manner to dampen movement of the counterweight relative to the cab after the cab is stopped following a downward travel.
Although the three previous examples each include the damper 50 supported on the counterweight frame 28, this invention also includes a damper 50 associated with the cab 22.
While the example of
The tension member 42 at least partially wraps around the sheaves 46, which are part of the base module 48 that remains stationary within the pit 52.
A significant advantage to a tie-down compensation arrangement designed according to this invention is that it allows for a smaller pit depth yet still provides maximum functionality for maintaining a desired tension on the load bearing member 30 and minimizing the likelihood for counterweight jump. In one example, the inventive arrangement allows for using a pit depth as shallow as 6′10½″ compared to conventional arrangements that would require a pit depth of greater than 10′. In one example, a pit depth savings of almost 4′ is achieved using the inventive arrangement. This provides the significant advantage of being able to use a tie-down compensation arrangement even for relatively high rise elevator systems where conventional chain compensation does not adequately address the tension and counterweight jump elimination requirements.
The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed examples may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from the essence of this invention. The scope of legal protection given to this invention can only be determined by studying the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US03/17093 | 5/30/2003 | WO | 00 | 11/14/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/108576 | 12/16/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
657380 | Baldwin | Sep 1900 | A |
1011423 | Gale | Dec 1911 | A |
4664229 | Obst | May 1987 | A |
4724929 | Coleman et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
5255759 | Kasai et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5398781 | Biewald et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5513724 | De Jong | May 1996 | A |
5750945 | Fuller et al. | May 1998 | A |
6123176 | O'Donnell et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6364063 | Aulanko et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6401871 | Baranda et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6499566 | Ach | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6966408 | Sweet | Nov 2005 | B2 |
20010025743 | Ach | Oct 2001 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2270292 | Mar 1994 | GB |
WO 0234659 | May 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060249337 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |