Tile roof construction obtained using one-component with adhesive pattern

Abstract
A method of adhering roof tiles to a roof utilizes a one-component adhesive and in particular, a one-component polyurethane adhesive foam applied to the undersurfaces of the roof tiles in a discontinuous patterns. The adhesive is applied in the form of separate deposits at opposing corners of the undersurfaces of the roof tiles and the roof tiles are laid on the roof in serial fashion and overlapping courses.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates generally to methods of roof construction, and more particularly relates to an improved method for adhering roof tiles to substrates using economical one-component adhesives, including one-component high-density polyurethane adhesive foams.




Roof construction, especially in residential construction, varies by location throughout the United States. In the northern climates, most roofs utilize a thin covering of tar paper-based shingles or thick wooden shingles as a final covering for the roof. In southern climates, tiles are used as the final covering of the roof. These roof tiles may be made from a variety of materials, including synthetic materials, such as plastics, and natural materials, such as stone, concrete, clay, ceramic and fired brick. In the application of these latter types of roof tiles, mortars or cementitious materials have been used in the past to apply the roof tiles to the roof substrate.




The use of mortars as roof tile adhesives is expensive because the mixing and application of the mortar is very labor intensive. Mortars are dense materials and their use as roof adhesives increases the load placed on the roof. The curing time for mortar may also be relatively long, thereby hampering quick completion of the roof. A need therefore exists for a lighter adhesive which is less labor intensive than mortar and which lends itself to efficient application of roof tiles.




Adhesives, and in particular adhesive foams, have been developed to replace mortars used in roof construction. U.S. Pat. No. 5,362,342, issued Nov. 8, 1994 describes the use of a two-component polyurethane foam to bond roof tiles to a substrate. This patent further describes the use of a bulky, complex pressurized dispensing system which is necessary to mix the two components together so that they may react to create a sufficient amount of foam with the desired adhesive characteristics. The aforesaid '342 patent further describes a particular method of using two-component foams to bond roof tiles to a roof substrate in which thick, linear beads of foam are applied to the entire length of the roof tiles.




One-component adhesives, such as those sold under the trade name INSTA-STIK by Insta-Foam of Joliet, Illinois have been utilized in the past, primarily for adhering roof insulation boards to roof substrates. These one-component adhesives are collapsible foams and are applied in long beads of foam for all or most of the entire length of the insulation boards to adhere the insulation boards to the roof. The use of long, linear beads of adhesives increases the cost of applications by using large amounts of adhesives and lengthening the application process.




The present invention is directed to a roof tile adhesion method which uses inexpensive one-component adhesives, and in a preferred embodiment one-component polyurethane adhesive foams, in a novel application pattern which significantly reduces the amount of adhesive used per roof tile without detracting from its adhesive strength.




It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a method of adhering roof tiles to a roof substrate using economical one-component adhesives, including one-component adhesive foams.




Another object of the present invention is to provide a method for adhering roof tiles to a substrate using a modest amount of adhesive in a unique pattern which reduces the amount of adhesive used for application, yet provides sufficient adhesive strength between the roof tile and the substrate.




Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a method for adhering roof tiles to a substrate by applying a one-component, high-density polyurethane adhesive foam to opposing corners of the roof tile and placing the tiles into contact with the substrate, and letting the adhesive foam cure to adhere the roof tile to the substrate.




Still yet another object of the present invention is to provide an improved tiled roof construction having a substrate, a plurality of roof tiles adhered to the substrate, the roof tiles being adhered to the substrate by an adhesive deposited in alignment with opposing corners of the roof tiles, the adhesive deposits having a pad-like profile, the adhesive pads adhering opposite corners of the tile to the roof substrate and a preceding tile course, the adhesive pads further defining a discontinuous adhesive pattern which does not subdivide the space between the tile undersurfaces and the roof substrate into discrete spaces to restrict air circulation between the roof tile and the roof substrate.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In one principal aspect of the present invention, a roof construction method is provided in which successive courses of roof tile are adhered to a roof substrate by applying a one-component adhesive to the undersurface of the roof tiles; laying the tiles in successive courses on the roof; and, permitting the foam to cure.




In another principal aspect of the present invention and as exemplified in one preferred embodiment, a method for applying roof tiles to a roof substrate is provided which includes the steps of: providing a one-component adhesive, particularly a one-component adhesive foam; applying a first course of roof tile to a roof substrate by depositing the adhesive in a discontinuous pattern comprising two separate deposits in registration with opposite corners of the roof tiles; adhering the first course of roof tiles to the roof substrate by placing the first course of roof tiles onto the roof substrate to effect contact between the adhesive deposits, the roof tiles and the roof substrate; dispensing a series of second deposits of the adhesive in registration with opposite corners of the undersurfaces of a second course of roof tiles; placing the second course of roof tiles over the roof substrate and the first course of roof tiles such that the tail portions thereof and adhesive deposits aligned therewith contact the roof substrate and the head portions thereof and adhesive deposits aligned therewith overlie and contact the first course of roof tiles; and, permitting the adhesive to cure such that the first and second roof tile courses become adhered to roof substrate.




In another principal aspect of the present invention and as exemplified by another embodiment of the invention, a roof construction includes a roof substrate and a plurality of roof tiles attached to the substrate in successive courses, each of the tiles being attached to the roof substrate by discontinuous deposits of a one-component adhesive aligned with opposing corners of the undersurfaces of roof tiles, the adhesive foam deposits spacing the tiles partially away from the roof substrate so as to create an air channel therebetween.




These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent through a reading of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




In the course of the description, reference will be made to the attached drawings in which:





FIG. 1

illustrates a typical pitched roof upon which roof tiles are attached;





FIG. 2

is a perspective view of a segment of a prior art roof construction utilizing a two-component adhesive foam to adhere a roof tile course to a roof substrate using, continuous, linear beads of adhesive foam along the entire length of the roof tiles;





FIG. 3

is a sectional view of

FIG. 2

taken along lines


3





3


thereof illustrating the longitudinal extent of the adhesive foam;





FIG. 4

is a perspective view of a section of a roof illustrating the placement of two courses of flat roof tiles installed thereon using the present invention;





FIG. 5

is a perspective view of a section of a roof illustrating the placement of two courses of roof tiles installed using the present invention and used with low profile, non-planar roof tiles;





FIG. 6

is a perspective view of a section of a roof illustrating the placement of two courses of roof tiles installed thereon using the present invention as used with S-shaped, high profile roof tiles;





FIG. 7

is a view of a tennis-ball like adhesive deposit used in the present invention;





FIG. 8

is a view of a pad-like deposit of adhesive foam used in the present invention; and





FIG. 9

is a cross-sectional view of FIG.


1


.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS





FIG. 1

illustrates a structure


20


having a roof


22


disposed thereon at a particular angle, or pitch P. The roof


22


includes a substrate


23


is supported on the structure


20


by a series of structural members, shown as roof joists


24


which are spaced apart from each other along the walls


26


of the structure. The roof joists


24


extend from the edge, or eave


25


of the roof upwardly at the pitch P and may be connected to a central ridge beam


28


at the apex


29


of the roof in a conventional manner.




The roof substrate


22


is commonly of a multiple layer construction and may include sheathing, or decking


30


, in the form of plywood, particle board, cement boards or the like which is preferably fixed to the joists


24


such as by nailing. This sheathing


30


serves as a support surface for the final covering, or cap sheet, of the roof


22


. This covering may be a water resistant material


32


, such as roofing felt or tar paper and is commonly referred to in the art as an “underlayment”. When circumstances dictate, such as when the pitch of the roof is steep, the substrate


20


may further include a series of spaced-apart batten strips


34


(shown in phantom) laterally applied to its surface to provide engagement points for anchor lugs formed in the roof tiles to engage in order to prevent movement of the roof tile during application to the substrate


22


.





FIGS. 2 & 3

illustrate a prior art roof construction


100


which is typical of the construction described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,362,342, in which roof tiles


102


are adhered to a roof substrate


22


. As described in the '342 patent, the construction


100


includes a plurality of low profile roofing tiles


102


having a Spanish-influenced design. Each roof tile


102


is rectangular in its exterior dimensions with a non-planar upper surface and has a hollow central semi-circular portion


103


flanked by two hollow quarter portions


104


,


105


which include respective engagement edges


106


,


107


. The central semi-circular portion


103


and its flanking quarter portions


104


,


105


meet together to define two support ribs


110


having a flat lower surface


112


which rest upon the exposed flat surface


33


of the roof


22


.




As taught in the aforesaid '342 patent, a two-component foam is deposited onto the exterior surface


33


of the roof


22


in the form of a thick, linear bead '15 of foam. This thick bead


115


of adhesive foam extends for the entire length of the tiles


102


. In the assembly of this type of roof construction, the foam bead


115


is used to apply a starter course


120


of roof tiles, and the length of the foam bead substantially matches the length L


1


of this first course


120


of tiles. Once the first course


120


has been applied, similar thick beads


125


having lengths L


2


which match the length of the second course


126


of tiles are applied to the roof substrate


23


and the first course


120


of tiles.




Although the use of the two-component foam


114


in this type of roof construction


100


is effective enough to adhere the roof tiles


102


in place upon the roof


22


, such two-component foams are generally expensive. Furthermore, the teachings of the '342 patent direct one skilled in the art to apply an adhesive foam bead for the entire length or substantially the entire length of the tiles


116


. This fashion of adhesive foam application promotes the use of more adhesive foam than necessary.




It has been discovered with the development of the present invention that a more economical one-component adhesive, including an adhesive foam, may be used to reliably adhere roof tiles to a roof substrate and in a particular pattern which uses significantly less adhesive than taught by the aforesaid '342 patent and other prior art roof-adhesive foam applications.




In an important aspect of the present invention, a one-component adhesive is utilized to adhere the roof tiles to the roof substrate. One advantage the use of one-component adhesives, especially one-component adhesive foams, have over two-components adhesive foams is cost. Another advantage is that one-component adhesives are dispensed from single pressurized containers, which avoids the use of maintaining separate adhesive foam components by the installer on site in inventory and the need for an elaborate and complex mixing, reacting and dispensing apparatus as are utilized with two-component adhesive foams an example of which is disclosed in the aforesaid '342 patent. Additionally, the methods of the present invention and, particularly the pattern used for the application of the adhesive, do not subdivide the undersurfaces of the roof tiles or the interstitial spaces between the undersurfaces and the roof substrate into discrete, areas which may inhibit the passage of air between the roof tile and the underlying roof substrate, and inhibit the opposing roof tile and substrate to grow and contract according to climatic conditions.




It has been found that the present invention significantly reduces the amount of adhesive needed to adhere a single roof tile to a roof substrate and further provides sufficient bonding strength to meet building code roof criteria. Table 1 which appears below in this detailed description, sets forth uplift test data for various profile roof tile using Tile Bond™ roof tile adhesive manufactured by Insta-Foam Products of Joliet, Illinois. This data indicates that the novel adhesive application pattern produces a sufficient uplift strength.




In another important aspect of the present invention, the one-component adhesive foam is dispensed onto the roof substrate and roof tiles in a discontinuous pattern so that the adhesive foam does not substantially subdivide the undersurfaces of each roof tile into discrete areas to thereby partially cut off air circulation as can the continuous, linear deposits of adhesive foam described in the aforesaid '342 patent. The adhesive foam is further concentrated in deposits at opposing corners of the underside of the roof tile.




The adhesive deposits of the present invention shall be aptly characterized in this detailed description as “pads” or “pad-like” deposits because they may comprise circular or irregular shapes, rather than comprise continuous or linear, longitudinal beads. It has been found through testing, the results of which are set forth below, that such pads provides optimum adhesive strength as measured by uplift resistance force with minimal usage of the foam. The pads


50


may be generally circular in configuration and approximately the size of a tennis ball about 2½-inches in diameter D, such as is shown in FIG.


7


. The adhesive pads may also have a generally rectangular pad-like configuration


52


of dimensions of about 1 inch high by 2 inches long by 3 inches wide as shown in FIG.


8


. It shall be understood that the adhesive configurations illustrated in

FIGS. 7 and 8

are merely exemplary of suitable deposits which have been demonstrated to provide the necessary uplift strength for use in roof tile attachment. Other discontinuous deposits may be utilized to achieve the same results.




It has also been noted that the use of these adhesive deposits in the particular pattern mentioned above not only reduces the amount of foam used, but also beneficially does not subdivide the undersurface of the roof tile and the interstitial space which occurs between the roof tile undersurfaces and the roof surface to restrict the passage of air therethrough in both the longitudinal and lateral directions (“X”,“Y”). Rather the present invention does not impart any such restrictive subdivision and thereby facilitates air passage which permits the roof substrate and tile to expand and contact harmoniously in various climatic conditions.




Testing of one particular adhesive, Tile Bond™ roof tile adhesive manufactured by Insta-Foam Products of Joliet, Ill., was performed on various profile roof tiles to determine the static uplift strength and moment resistance of the adhesive pattern of the present invention. This testing was performed in accordance with the Dade County (Florida) Testing Protocol PA 101-95 (JAN) “Test Procedure for Static Uplift Resistance of Mortar or Adhesive Set Tile Systems”. This Tile Bond™ adhesive in a one-component, high-density polyurethane adhesive foam. This type of foam is a minimal expanding foam and has a density which ranges from about


1{fraction (1/2+L )} pounds per cubic foot to about


4 pounds per cubic foot. The density of this adhesive foam is increased when the roof tile is passed into contact with it. Greater density foams may be used up to about 10 pounds per cubic foot.




The testing was performed on roof panels constructed in accordance with that described in the PA 101-95 test protocol. The roof panels had dimensions of around 4 by 8 feet upon which 14 test tiles were applied using the Insta Foam Tile Bond™ roof tile adhesive foam described above. The test sections were constructed using nominal ½ inch plywood, American Plywood Association 32/16 sheathing having a thickness of {fraction (15/32)} inches. The sheathing was nailed to 2-inch by 6-inch supports spaced at the perimeters of the sheathing and spaced on 24-inch centers in between. The nailing pattern was conventional using


8




d


(8-penny) common nails spaced on 6-inch centers along the perimeters of the panels and 12-inches within the panel.




An underlayment was applied to the sheathing after nailing which consisted of an ASTM D226, Type II anchor sheet with 12 gauge roofing nails and 1⅝-inch tin caps. The nailing pattern was a 12-inch grid pattern staggered in two rows of the roof panel field and 6-inch centers at any laps. An ASTM D249 mineral surface top ply sheet was attached to the anchor sheet by way of a coating of ASTM D312, Type IV asphalt and allowed to dry for 24 hours before the application of any tile systems. Thus underlayment is known in the art as a “standard 30/90” underlayment.




Two other underlayments were used in the tests. One underlayment consisted of a 40 mil thickness rubberized SBS modified asphalt sheet sold under the tradename Rainproof-40 by the Protectowrap Company. The other underlayment consisted of a standard two-ply 30 system using two layers of ASTM D226, Type II sheets and horizontal batten strips. These roofing sheets were lapped 19 inches over preceding sheets and mechanically attached to the roof sheathing using nails at 6-inch centers in rows of 18-inch centers.




A number of roof panels were constructed using the three types of underlayments described above and after the 24-hour period drying period, various profile roof tiles were attached in respective sets to each roof panel. A test hole was drilled in each of the test tiles of the panels and was located on the centerline of the roof tile at a distance of 0.76 times the length (i.e., 0.76×Length) of the tile from the head of the tile. A ¼-inch diameter concrete anchor screw was installed in this hole to provide a point on the roof tile to which a test load could be applied.




The tiles tested consisted of the second course of tiles, which were applied to a preceding roof tile course with a nominal 2-inch overlap. That is, the trailing edge of the roof tile was laid upon the leading edge of the preceding roof tile course. Fourteen test tiles were evaluated for each of Tests 1 through 4 on roof panels constructed using a standard 30/90 underlayment and twelve test tiles were evaluated for Tests 5 and 6 on roof panels using the rubberized SBS modified asphalt sheet and two-ply 30 system underlayments. Tile Bond™ adhesive was dispensed in a discontinuous pattern in registration with the opposite corners of the roof tiles.




Four different styles of roof tiles were tested from two different roof tile manufacturers. Those style tiles were the “Colonial”, “Capri” and “Espana” styles manufactured by Lifetile and the “Villa” style tile manufactured by Monier. The adhesive dispenser was weighed after adhesive was applied to every 3 to 4 tiles in order to obtain an average value of the mass of adhesive used for each tile. The adhesive was allowed to cure overnight and then the roof tiles were tested to determine their uplift resistance.




A floor model Instron No. 1115 testing machine equipped with a 1000 lb load cell and chart recorder was used for testing the tiles. A chain was attached between the load cell of the Instron machine and the test screw of a particular tile. The roof panels were inclined at about 9.5° to emulate a roof pitch of 2:12, that is 2-inch rise for every 12-inch of horizontal extent. The test results are reproduced in Table 1 below:



















TABLE 1













AVERAGE




AVERAGE




MINIMUM











ADHESIVE




ULTI-




RESIST-






TEST NUMBER




NUMBER





ROOF




AMOUNT




MATE




ANCE




RESISTING






& TILE




OF TILES




TILE




UNDERLAY-




(per




LOAD




LOAD




MOVEMENT






STYLE




TESTED




PROFILE




MENT




tile)




(LBS)




(LBS)




FT-LBS











1- Colonial




14




Flat




30/90




13.8




143.1




66.3




71.1






2- Capri




14




Low




30/90




12.3




185.1




87.3




93.5






3- Espana




14




High




30/90




9.8




131.8




60.2




65.0






4- Villa




14




Low




30/90




14.2




223.3




107.0




111.2






5- Colonial




12




Flat




SBS




12.8




223.3




106.0




113.9









Modified






6- Colonial




12




Flat




2-ply




11.1




224.2




106.4




101.0









30 with









batten









strips














It can be seen from Table 1 that the average mass of adhesive used per tile varied between about 9 grams to about 15 grams (or about 4 grams to about 8 grams per adhesive deposit), yet the least minimum ultimate load obtained was about 130 lbs as reflected in Test 3. Other testing of one component adhesives using about 2 grams per desposit have yielded uplift failure values of about 100 pounds of force. Thus, it can be seen that the discontinuous pattern of the present invention provides sufficient uplift force resistance with a substantial reduction in foam amount.




Turning now to

FIGS. 4-7

, examples of various types of roof tiles and their adhesion to a roof using the present invention are illustrated.

FIG. 4

illustrates a section


400


of a pitched roof using flat profile roof tiles similar in configuration to the “Colonial” tiles of Test 1 of Table 1. The roof substrate


22


is planar and includes support sheathing


30


covered by an underlayment


32


. The roof section


400


depicted includes a lower eave


25


and the roof section


400


is angled upwardly at a preset pitch P up to a ridge


28


(shown in phantom).




In accordance with the present invention, a first set of roof tiles


405


is selected from a supply of tiles. The tiles


405


have opposing leading and trailing edges


406


,


407


and side edges


408


which interconnect the leading and trailing edges


406


,


407


together to define an overall rectangular configuration, the side edges


408


may include engagement members


410


as illustrated which permit the interconnection of adjacent ones of the first tiles


405


. A discontinuous pattern of a one-component adhesive as previously described is used for attachment of these tiles


405


to the roof substrate


22


. This pattern includes two separate adhesive deposits


420


,


421


which are preferably aligned with each other near the opposite corners


424


,


425


of the portions of the roof tiles


402


which oppose the roof


22


and near the leading and trailing edges


406


,


407


thereof. The lower adhesive deposits


421


are positioned close to the eave


25


of the roof


400


on the first course tiles


405


.




After the adhesive deposits


420


,


421


are applied to either to the exterior surface


33


of the underlayment


32


or directly to the undersurfaces


412


of the first course tiles


405


, the tiles


405


are placed onto the roof


400


so that contact is made between the adhesive deposits


420


,


421


, the roof tiles


405


and the roof underlayment


32


. In this regard, the tiles


405


are preferably pushed down onto the adhesive deposits


420


,


421


to effect a reliable contact with the underlayment


32


. The adhesive deposits do not subdivide the interstitial spaces occurring between the roof tiles and the roof substrate into discrete areas such as is taught in the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 5,362,342 which division would restrict air and moisture flow therebetween. Rather, the adhesive deposits


420


,


421


beneficially do not create any such subdivision so that the passage of air (and moisture) through the interstitial spaces is facilitated rather than inhibited as illustrated in the phantom arrows of FIG.


4


. Flow of air and moisture through these interstitial areas


414


occurs as indicated by the arrows in

FIGS. 4 & 8

, and permits the roof substrate and tiles to expand and contract in accordance with climatic conditions.




A second set of roof tiles


430


is then selected and the discontinuous adhesive pattern is repeated. That is, two adhesive deposits


431


,


432


are registered with the leading and trailing edges


434


,


435


and opposite corners


438


,


439


of a second course of tiles


430


in locations corresponding to the corner-corner arrangement illustrated in the upper left of FIG.


4


. Once the adhesive is deposited (either on the tile themselves or the opposing roof or preceding tile surfaces), the second tiles


430


are positioned over the roof substrate


23


and the leading edges


406


of the first tiles


405


so that an overlap “O” occurs as illustrated as per the tile manufacturer's installation instructions. The second tiles


430


are then pressed down so that effective contact is made between their undersurfaces


433


, the adhesive deposits


431


,


432


, and the roof substrate and first tile course overlap O. The second set


430


of tiles are further staggered, or offset, laterally a distance of approximately 50% of the width W of the tiles so that the interengaging side edges


436


of the tiles


430


are not aligned together in a line from the eave


25


of the roof up toward the ridge


28


of the roof


400


.




In

FIG. 4

, it can also be seen that the first set of tiles


405


which are applied at the eave


25


of the roof


22


includes a portion


410


which overhangs the eave


25


. The length of this overhang is commonly dictated by local building codes and a common overhang is in the order of 2 inches. Uplift forces may be exerted against these overhang portions


410


by high winds, and in order to provide an additional factor of safety for this first set of tiles


405


to counteract any such uplift forces, an additional adhesive deposit


422


may be applied in alignment with the remaining lower corner


426


of each of the tiles


405


of the first tile course near the trailing edges


407


thereof.





FIG. 5

illustrates another roof section


500


using a different profile tile. The tiles shown are a low profile tile similar to the “Capri” style tested in Test 2 of Table 1. The first course of tiles


502


have opposed leading and trailing edges


504


,


505


and side edges


506


which interconnect the edges


504


,


505


. The side edges


506


include interlocking strips


508


which permit adjacent tiles to be interlocked together. The first tiles


502


further have a curved exterior configuration and in this regard, the undersurfaces


510


of the tiles


502


include ribs


512


which are intended to contact the roof substrate.




Utilizing the present invention, two adhesive deposits


520


,


521


are positioned in a discontinuous pattern in alignment with and near the opposing corners


524


,


525


and leading and trailing edges


504


,


505


of the first tiles


502


. The first tiles


502


are placed onto the substrate so that the adhesive deposits


520


,


521


make effective contact between the substrate


23


and the tile undersurfaces


510


. A second set of tiles


530


is selected and the adhesive is either applied to those tiles


530


or to the substrate


23


and to the overlap area


532


of the first tiles


502


in the discontinuous pattern of the invention, as exemplified by the two adhesive deposits


535


,


536


shown exposed in the upper left of FIG.


5


. The second tiles


530


are then applied onto the adhesive deposits


535


,


536


so that the leading edges


538


of the tiles


530


oppose the roof substrate and the trailing edges


539


thereof oppose the first tiles


502


.





FIG. 6

illustrates another roof section


600


with a plurality of high profile S-shaped roof tiles similar in style to the “Espana” tiles tested in Test 3 of Table 1. The roof section


600


includes a first set of tiles


602


which have a non-planar configuration and S-shaped profile when viewed from either the leading edge


604


or trailing edge


606


of the tiles


602


. Side edges


606


interconnect the leading and trailing edges


604


,


605


and preferably include engagement strips


608


disposed therealong. The first tiles


602


are applied to the roof substrate


23


near the eave


25


of the roof


600


by first applying a one-component adhesive in the corner-corner discontinuous pattern of the invention as described above. The tiles


602


illustrated typically may also include anchor lugs


607


formed on their undersurfaces to assist in retention of the tiles


602


on steeply pitched roofs. These anchor lugs


607


will typically engage a batten strip


34


. The adhesive deposits


610


,


611


in this type application are preferably made in alignment with the opposite corners


614


,


615


of the tiles


602


to the extent that they oppose the roof


22


and make contact on the upper end with the anchor lugs


607


and batten strips


34


.




A second set of tiles


620


is selected and two additional adhesive deposits


622


,


623


are applied in alignment with opposite corners


624


,


625


of the tiles


620


. As shown in

FIG. 6

, the adhesive deposits


624


,


625


may be applied to the head lap portion of a lower, adjoining first tile


602


and to the roof substrate


23


, and the tile is then positioned so that it contacts the adhesive pads


624


,


625


.




It will be appreciated that the method of applying roof tiles, as described hereinabove, increases the efficiency and reduces the cost for the installation of tile roofs. No complex two-component adhesive foam pressurized supply is needed, and significantly less amounts of foam are used in the application, leading to material cost savings. Additionally, the corner-corner pattern does an unimpeded air channel between the undersurfaces of the tiles and the roof substrate.




It will be appreciated that the embodiments of the present invention which have been discussed are merely illustrative of some of the applications of this invention and that numerous modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the true spirit and scope of this invention. For example, the adhesive deposits may, in some application, take the form of beads applied in alignment with the leading and trailing edges of the tiles provided they do not subdivide the interstitial areas into discrete subareas. The deposits may also resemble mounds or piles.



Claims
  • 1. In a roof construction having a substrate and a plurality of roof tiles adhesively affixed to said roof, the roof tiles being arranged in successive rows upon the roof, a first row of said roof tiles being adhesively affixed to said roof, a second row of said roof tiles overlying a portion of said roof and a portion of said roof tile first row, said second row being adhesively affixed to said roof and said roof tiles first row, and at least one subsequent row of roof tiles overlying a portion of said roof and a portion of said roof tiles second row, said roof tile subsequent row being adhesively affixed to said roof and to said roof tile second row, the improvement comprising:each roof tile being adhesively affixed by a one-component foam adhesive applied to individual roof tiles in a discontinuous, diagonal pattern, the discontinuous diagonal pattern including two distinct deposits of said adhesive positioned on undersurfaces of said individual roof tiles and proximate to opposing corners of said individual roof tiles.
  • 2. The improved roof construction of claim 1, wherein said individual roof tiles are low profile roof tiles having a generally planar exterior configuration.
  • 3. The improved roof construction of claim 1, wherein said individual roof tiles are high profile and have a non-planar exterior configuration.
  • 4. The improved roof construction of claim 1, wherein said high profile roof tiles have an S-shaped configuration when viewed from an end thereof.
  • 5. The improved roof construction of claim 1, wherein said two distinct deposits of said adhesive applied to each of said individual roof tiles have a combined mass of between about 9 grams per roof tile and about 15 grams per roof tile.
  • 6. The improved roof construction of claim 1, wherein said two distinct deposits of said adhesive applied to said individual roof tiles include two distinct pads of said adhesive approximating the size of a tennis ball.
  • 7. The improved roof construction of claim 1, wherein said two distinct deposits of said adhesive applied to said individual roof tiles include two distinct pads of said adhesive approximately 2{fraction (1/2+L )} inches in diameter.
  • 8. The improved roof construction of claim 1, wherein said two distinct deposits of said adhesive applied to said individual roof tiles include two piles of said adhesive, each pile of said adhesive having approximate dimension of about 1 inch by about 2 inches by about 3 inches.
  • 9. The improved roof construction of claim 1, wherein said adhesive pattern does not extend between opposing edges of said individual tiles and does not divide said undersurfaces of said individual roof tiles into distinct sections.
  • 10. The improved roof construction of claim 1, wherein said first row of roof tiles are affixed to said roof by contacting both of said two distinct adhesive deposits of each of said roof tiles of said roof tile last row to said substrate.
  • 11. The improved roof construction of claim 10, wherein said second row of roof tiles are affixed to said roof by contacting one of each of said two adhesive deposits of said adhesive applied to said individual roof tiles to said roof substrate and contacting the other of said two adhesive deposits to said first row of roof tiles.
  • 12. In a tile roof construction having a substrate and a plurality of roof tiles adhesively affixed to said roof, each of the roof tiles having opposing top and bottom surfaces, leading and trailing edges and side edges interconnecting the leading and trailing edges, said roof tiles being arranged in successive rows upon the roof, a first row of said roof tiles being adhesively affixed to said roof, a second row of said roof tiles overlying a portion of said roof and a portion of said first row of roof tiles, said second row of roof tiles being adhesively affixed to both said roof and said first row of roof tile, and at least one subsequent row of roof tiles overlying a portion of said roof and a portion of said second row of roof tiles, said subsequent row of roof tiles being adhesively affixed to both said roof and to said second row of roof tiles, the improvement comprising:each said roof tile being adhesively affixed to said roof by way of a one-component adhesive foam applied in a discontinuous diagonal pattern to said roof and said roof tiles, the discontinuous diagonal pattern including two distinct deposits of said adhesive foam located proximate to opposing corners of said individual roof tiles and in opposition to said bottom surfaces of said roof tiles.
  • 13. The improved tile roof construction of claim 12, wherein said adhesive foam deposits are applied to said bottom surfaces of said roof tiles proximate to said side edges of said roof tiles.
  • 14. The improved tile roof construction of claim 12, wherein said adhesive foam deposits associated with each roof tile have a combined total mass of about between 9 and about 15 grams.
  • 15. An improved roof construction utilizing a plurality of roof tiles adhesively affixed a roof surface, the roof surface having at least one defined eave;a plurality of roof tiles, each of the roof tiles having opposing leading and trailing edges interconnected by marginal side edges, each of said roof tiles having opposing upper and undersurfaces; said roof tiles being arranged in successive rows upon said roof surface such that: a first row of said roof tiles is positioned on said roof surface close to said roof eave so that a portion of said undersurfaces of said first row of said roof tiles oppose said roof surface; and, a second row of said roof tiles is positioned on said roof surface close to said first row of roof tiles so that portions of said second row of roof tiles overlie both said roof surface and said first row of roof tiles; each of said roof tiles of said first row of roof tiles being adhesively affixed to said roof surface by way of two separate first deposits of a one-component adhesive foam in a diagonal pattern aligned with and proximate to said leading and trailing edges of said undersurfaces of said first roof tiles, said first adhesive deposits adhesively affixing the undersurfaces of said first row roof tiles to said roof surface; and, each of said roof tiles of said second row of roof tiles being adhesively affixed to said roof surface and said first row of roof tiles by way of two separate second deposits of said one-component adhesive foam in a diagonal pattern aligned with and proximate to said leading and trailing edges of said undersurfaces of said second row of roof tiles, said second adhesive deposits adhesively affixing the undersurfaces of said second row roof tiles to said roof surface and to said first row roof tiles.
  • 16. The improved tile roof construction of claim 15, wherein said roof includes an underlayment interposed between said roof and said roof tiles.
  • 17. The roof construction of claim 15, wherein said second adhesive deposits of said second row of roof tiles are aligned with opposing comers of said second row of roof tiles.
  • 18. The roof construction of claim 15, wherein said first and second adhesive deposits of said first and second row of roof tiles have a pad-like configuration having approximate dimensions of about 1 inch by about 2 inches by about 3 inches.
  • 19. The roof construction of claims 15, wherein said first and second adhesive deposits of said first and second row of roof tiles are respectively aligned with opposing marginal side edges of said roof tiles of said first and second rows of roof tiles.
REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a divisional application of prior U.S. application Ser. No. 08/649,450, filed May 17, 1996 now U.S. Pat. No. 5,895,536.

US Referenced Citations (5)
Number Name Date Kind
2667131 Clarvoe et al. Jan 1954
3080683 Sallie Mar 1963
5362342 Murray et al. Nov 1994
5465547 Jakel Nov 1995
5582898 Kiser Dec 1996