The present invention relates generally to ceramic linings for walls of reactors subject to high temperatures and more particularly to anchoring systems for tiles which are used to form such ceramic linings
Refinery process units, such as fluid catalytic cracking units, and other reactors and furnace-like equipment require, by their very nature, heat, wear and chemical resistant linings along portions of their interiors. The present art of ramming monolithic refractories into hexagonal-shaped metal mesh is well known.
Common practices in the field are to line reactors with hexagonal mesh (
To the extent that any pre-formed tiles are used, tabs 103 may be of assistance in securing the tiles. The punching of tabs 103 leaves holes 104 in metal strips 101. These holes 104 can be used to secure pre-formed tiles to the interior of a reactor surface in place of the monolithic material.
Unfortunately, state of the art linings and the related techniques suffer from a number of drawbacks. These drawbacks include a relatively low mechanical stability and they often require very thick and heavy walls in order to provide the properties necessary to protect the reactor components. Another disadvantage of these prior art linings is the fact that it is generally difficult to remove individual elements or lining sections easily or non-destructively for replacement.
Finally, these prior art linings often are incapable of satisfying the ceramic property requirements associated with increasingly severe processes that result in ever increasing thermal and mechanical loads and stresses.
What is therefore needed is an anchoring system that will securely hold tiles to the substrate, while at the same time being easy to install and preferably being able to be retrofitted with existing refractory linings, including those with existing mesh.
One object of the present invention is to provide a tile for use in refinery process units, reactors and other furnace-like equipment that may be easily affixed to a substrate.
Another object is to provide a tile for use in refinery process units, reactors and other furnace-like equipment that is capable of remaining affixed to the substrate despite being exposed to a severe environment.
These and other objects will become apparent from the detailed description of the preferred forms set out below and now summarized as follows. The present invention employs individual tiles to form the reactor lining and to provide the ceramic properties that are required by a broad range of processes. The tiles forming the ceramic lining of the present invention are mounted into a hexagonal mesh or other abutment. Preformed tiles according to the teachings of the present invention have an advantage over the present in-situ-formed monolithic linings in that they can be made much more durable than present linings, as well as being more easily replaced, in whole or in part, over a continuous lining.
Further, problems arising in the mounting of tiles to form an internal refractory surface are addressed according to the present invention. Unreliable mounting systems in the prior art which allow ingress of particulate materials (catalyst or other) between or beneath tiles, lead to quicker degradation of the refractory lining, resulting in poor performance, downtime or property damage. Typically, in a room-temperature application, tiles are cemented or anchored via simple mechanical attachment to a substrate. Where elevated temperatures are involved, the ceramic tile become loose or form gaps between them due to reversible thermal expansion differences between the tile and the metal substrate. Typically, ceramics have half or less reversible thermal expansion as compared to stainless steels. If particulate materials are present of sufficiently small size, as is the case in FCCU's, they will become lodged between and behind the tiles. When the unit subsequently cools for any reason, reversible thermal expansion dictates that the tile return to the original size. The trapped particulate material prevents this from happening, setting up powerful stresses in the tile, often causing failure of the tile itself or failure of the attachment.
The present invention allows for tiles to be placed into the same hexagonal arrangement of mesh now commonly used in cyclones, and at the same time limits the deleterious effects of particulate ingress.
A preferred form of the tile for use in refinery process units, reactors and other furnace-like equipment is intended to accomplish at least one or more of the aforementioned objects according to the present teachings. One such form includes a tile for use in reactors and other furnace like equipment wherein the tile has an embedded locating rod that, when properly inserted into place, will laterally deploy into one or more punch holes 104 and secure the tile into place. In a refinement of this form, the tile is formed to include a gap that accepts a locating rod from an abutting tile.
In one form of this invention, a pin is driven into the top surface of the tile and forces at least one locating rod into a gap. In a refinement of this form, the threaded pin or screw is constructed of the same material as the tile surface and locks into place with a minimal seam on the tile surface.
In another form, the tile includes an embedded cam mechanism which, when turned, forces at least one locating rod into a gap. In a refinement of this form, the screw is constructed of the same material as the tile surface and locks into place with a minimal seam in the tile surface
In still another form, the tile has at least one embedded locating rod that is forced out and into a gap due to the insertion of a liquid material into a cavity in the tile. In this embodiment, the liquid material hardens into a refractory solid once the locating rod is in place.
The present invention will now be described in more detail with reference to preferred forms of the invention, given only by way of example, and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Reference is now made to the forms depicted in
Surfaces that are subject to high levels of erosion, wear, corrosive elements, high temperatures and other such conditions need to be protected with materials that are resistant to such an environment. Refinery process units, such as fluid catalytic cracking units (FCCU's), furnaces and other types of equipment, hereinafter referred to generically as “reactors,” are types of such equipment having a need for such linings. Although there are other kinds of equipment that equally have a need for resistant linings, herein FCCU's are used an exemplary embodiment of such equipment. As such, the teachings of the present invention should not be viewed to be limited to linings only for the particular equipment described in the examples of the following description. Instead, it should be understood that the invention described herein is limited only to what is claimed in the claims included herewith.
More reliable methods of mounting tiles to a refractory lining using locating rods embedded in a tile are now described. When a tile is in proper position, locating rods, as described below, are mechanically forced, laterally, into a gap. This gap may be a portion of the hexagonal mesh of the prior art, gaps in other structural devices of any shape which can cover area, such as triangles or rectangles, or even another adjacent tile. The locating rods may then be secured into position.
A detailed description of each of the embodiments is now provided.
Tile 400 has two locating rods 420 laterally embedded therein. Threaded pin or screw 410 may be forced into a space inside tile 400, and as a result, locating rods 420 are forced outwards. Threaded pin or screw 410 is locked in place by the threaded portion 440 of tile 400 accepting the end of pin 410.
The tile 400 is secured in place as a result of threaded screw 410 protruding into a matching threaded section 440 of tile 400 wherein the matching threaded section 440 is designed to receive the end portion of threaded pin or screw 410. The pin or screw 410 contains a recessed cavity 470 for the insertion of a tool to rotate the screw. The recess may be compatible with any of a number of tools, for example, Allen wrench, star tool or Phillips head screwdriver.
A preferred form using only a single locating rod 720 per tile is shown in
To be compatible with current art using hexmetal mesh, the locating rod 720 may be, for example 25 mm long with a rod diameter of 5 mm and a rectangular cross-section head of 5 mm by 10 mm. The depth of the rectangular head may be 5 mm to 10 mm, for example.
In a preferred embodiment the tiles 710 in the embodiment of
Locating rods for all embodiments may be constructed of nearly any rigid, corrosive resistant material. Preferred materials, however, include pure ceramics, pure metals or mixtures of each.
Although the retaining tabs 103 in available hexmetal constructs are efficient for use with prior art, in-situ ceramics, they are generally not utilized in connection with the structures of the present invention, which requires the rapid and secure placement of tiles. The tabs 103, useful to secure monolithic refractory when rammed in-situ, generally interfere with the insertion of tiles into the hexmetal 10 when preformed tiles are used as the ceramic material. The punch holes 104 which are created as a result of forming the tabs 103, however, may be utilized according to the teachings of the present invention as described above.
While the preferred forms have been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, they are illustrative and not restrictive in character. All changes and modifications that come within the scope of the preferred forms are desired to be protected.
The application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/439,968, filed on May 16, 2003.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
191383 | Stuart | May 1877 | A |
298889 | Pritchard | May 1884 | A |
488961 | Brintnall | Dec 1892 | A |
822562 | Tucker | Jun 1906 | A |
956759 | Clouse | May 1910 | A |
1534341 | Bernotow | Apr 1925 | A |
2074874 | Vogel | Mar 1937 | A |
2096963 | Erman | Oct 1937 | A |
2122696 | Poston | Jul 1938 | A |
2337156 | Elmendorf | Dec 1943 | A |
2413183 | Hosbein | Dec 1946 | A |
3106751 | Fish | Oct 1963 | A |
3187694 | Crookston et al. | Jun 1965 | A |
3362740 | Burnes | Jan 1968 | A |
3567260 | Norris | Mar 1971 | A |
3798860 | Mason | Mar 1974 | A |
3953061 | Hansen et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4073243 | Merkle, Jr. | Feb 1978 | A |
4117201 | Keifert | Sep 1978 | A |
4122642 | Buchy | Oct 1978 | A |
4137681 | Pasley | Feb 1979 | A |
4176505 | Fischer | Dec 1979 | A |
4333406 | Duke | Jun 1982 | A |
4344753 | Shelley et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4651487 | Nishikawa | Mar 1987 | A |
4680010 | Ginzburg et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4680908 | Crowley | Jul 1987 | A |
4753053 | Heard | Jun 1988 | A |
4768447 | Roumeguere | Sep 1988 | A |
4934116 | Frederiksen | Jun 1990 | A |
5058937 | Miehe et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5438813 | Wade | Aug 1995 | A |
5542218 | Rompel | Aug 1996 | A |
5586795 | Sasaki | Dec 1996 | A |
5673527 | Coston et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5957067 | Dobbeling et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6044805 | Walker et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6129967 | Young et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6393789 | Lanclos | May 2002 | B1 |
6397765 | Becker | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6782669 | Dixon | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6887551 | Hyde et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
180553 | Jul 1986 | EP |
5-157224 | Jun 1993 | JP |
WO 9209850 | Jun 1992 | WO |
WO 9709577 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO 0068615 | Nov 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070113514 A1 | May 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10439968 | May 2003 | US |
Child | 11653967 | US |