Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
When people use body supported electronic equipment or writing pads, often times it is difficult to easily view the display screen or pads. Even mobile display screens on flat surfaces can pose difficult viewing depending on the height of the person and the location of where the person is sitting relative to the display screen. Given this, several ways have been suggested for rotating or otherwise adjusting the screen for better viewing.
Further, as a result, many inventive ways to adjust the height, the left/right tilt and the vertical tilt of the display screen have been suggested. However, only Carleton et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,762,250 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,639,004 suggest the use of a rolled up piece of material as a tilt mechanism for a lap resting case secured by shoulder straps to a person. The piece of material comes from a releasable bottom piece or a top cover of the carrying case for an electronic device. Velcro type fastener strips or other fasteners such as buckles or snaps can be used on the edges to keep the roll from slipping. A primary purpose seems to be to cushion the person from damage by the carrying case through varying the cushioning and distancing effects by the tightness of the rolling of the material. The use of an air bladder or inflatable cushion is suggested to increase the size of the roll or the tilt. It is not suggested to use this roll of material with an electronic device resting on a non-portable table nor with a thigh attached kneeboard. Further, the piece of material has no incremental tilt stops nor any given specific construction.
There is on the market a tilt pad sold for use with kneeboards that is effectively a wedge to be manually inserted as wanted. Such a wedge is not particularly secure in placement. The amount of tilt from this wedge depends on how far the wedge is inserted beneath the electronic device support or writing pad support.
Hence there is a need for a more reliable tilt mechanism to provide variable elevation along any side of a portable electronic device or portable lap table. The present inventive tilt mechanism provides such improved reliability.
Further there is a need for a more reliable tilt mechanism to provide variable elevation along any side of an electronic device supported as part of a kneeboard. The present inventive tilt mechanism provides such improved reliability.
When included in a portable IPad or other electronic device carrying case, such a tilt mechanism can provide improved visibility and maneuverability of the data screen when in use as compared to the present state of the art. If such a portable carrying case was convertible into a lap table or a kneeboard, then the carrying case would provide a compact and easily portable resource for the user. It would be convenient for carrying in a backpack or a flight bag. Hence it would meet the additional needs of easy portability and convertibility of an electronic device carrying case containing such a tilt mechanism.
The present inventive tilt mechanism (tiltable support apparatus) is a flat flexible layer for rolling to form a rolled elevating device able to variably elevate any one of said four sides of a supported lap table, kneeboard, or electronic device. This flexible layer has attachment material such as felt, Velcro or similar material upon one or both sides of the layer that may be in a ‘waffle’ or checkerboard type configuration. The attachment material allows for secure but reversible attachment of the flexible layer as well as the rolled elevating device to adjacent structures. There are also embodiments in which the rolled elevating device can attach to itself to more securely maintain a specific increment of tilt or elevation desired.
Another embodiment of the present inventive tilt mechanism is a multi-layer case with at least three layers. The outer layers are of leather or other resilient material. The outer layers have a Velcro or a hook-and-loop material or similar type of material as a covering or as a securely attached portion upon at least part of their inner surfaces for use to reversibly connect with the central layer or with the rolled elevating device formed by rolling the central layer to achieve a desired degree of tilt. The central layer has material easily attachable to the inner surfaces of the multi-layer case such as felt, Velcro or similar material upon both sides of the central layer. This attachable material may be in a ‘waffle’ or checkerboard type configuration. As noted above, the central layer also can be rolled to form a rolled elevating device able to variably elevate any one of said four sides of a supported lap table, kneeboard, or electronic device.
The inventive case may be contained within an I-pad carrying case or other electronic device case just below the position for the device. Optionally, it may be secured in place with Velcro, elastic bands, or other types of securing means known in the art.
In another embodiment, the central layer has regularly spaced raised pieces along the plane defined by the x and y axes and on both sides of the layer. The raised pieces may be of any convenient shape, such as circular or square, that effectively attaches to adjacent structures and/or to other parts of the central layer. When rolled left/right or from/to a person, such a layer provides a variable tilt mechanism which can be locked into place by the Velcro or similar material present on the inner sides of the adjacent outer layers. One embodiment has a hook and loop fastener system with the raised pieces on one side of the central layer being of hook and loop material and the raised pieces on the other side being of the complementary mating hook and loop material. Another embodiment has each side with both the hook and loop material in some of the raised pieces and the complementary mating hook and loop material in others of the raised pieces. This combination is set in a pattern effective to efficiently meet the attachment needs. An additional embodiment has such a combination pattern only on one side of the central layer. When rolled to form a rolled elevating device, the raised pieces are preferably on the outside of the roll to allow for attachment to adjacent structures.
As seen in
In another embodiment, the central layer (1) has regularly spaced raised pieces (2) along the plane defined by the x (5) and y (6) axes and on both sides of the layer (1). As seen in
Also depicted in
Another embodiment of the present inventive tilt mechanism is a multi-layer case with at least three layers (10, 1 if flat or 15 if rolled, 16) as seen in
In
The inventive case may be contained within an I-pad carrying case or other electronic device case just below the position for the device. Optionally, it may be secured in place with Velcro, elastic bands, snaps, a holder, or other types of securing means known in the art.
Further, the inventive case may be securely closed by means known in the art such as a zipper means, a magnetic means, a Velcro means, elastic bands, a hook-and-loop type material means, a snap strap means, and combinations thereof.
Similarly, the rolled elevating device (15) could be used alone without a case to elevate an electronic device, a lap table, a kneeboard, and other structures supported on the human body or on a permanent table. This is depicted in
Another use of the rolled elevating device (15) is seen in
More detail of the reversibly attachable kneeboard support structure can be seen in
As noted above, the rolled elevating device (15) can be used with or without the multilayer case configuration to elevate or tilt a device resting on a non-portable table. For purposes of this invention, folding tables are considered non-portable. Tables considered portable are ones that can be transported easily in small luggage, backpacks, briefcases, and the like.
The slightly exploded view of the inside side of the case for the electronic device shows a similar arrangement inside the case for attachment from below to the raised pieces (2) of the rolled elevating device (15). The adjacent structure (16) adjacent to the lower part of the rolled elevating device (15) is the inside of the case. Attachment material (17) is present on at least part of adjacent structure (16) in order to attach reversibly to the raised pieces (2) of the rolled elevating device (15) and thereby secure the rolled elevating device (15) in a position with optimally desired tilt.
The case for the electronic device is depicted with a means to close the case (33). In this embodiment, the means (33) is a tab with a snap or magnetic closure (34). There are many means with which closure can be achieved as is well known in the art and hence encompassed within this invention. Additionally, it is often desired to use other accoutrements while working with an electronic device. Hence attachments for writing implements, paper, pads, maps, etc. are often included in the case structure for electronic devices. One such example in
If the case for an electronic device is intended for use as a lap table when open, the underside of the case may be provided with one or more stiffeners so that the panels of the lap board will not droop. One type of stiffeners is depicted in
An example of a case for an electronic device being open and used as a lap table supporting the electronic device is depicted in
The spacing of the raised pieces on the flexible layer helps determine how many levels of tilt are available for use in any direction of roll. The closer the spacing, the more levels of possible tilt are available. While homogeneous attachable surfaces could be used, using raised pieces has several advantages. It is easier to prevent slippage and unintentional tilt changes when using raised pieces for attachment rather than a continuous attachment surface. Further the weight of the device is reduced when raised pieces are used instead of a continuous attachment surface. Unlike the homogenous character of a continuous attachment surface, the raised pieces may be a mixture of attachment character such as a mixture of alternating hook pieces with loop pieces. This would allow attachment to a greater variety of surfaces.
The number of raised pieces and their spacing on the flexible layer may be determined for a given product by the intended end use. Use with a kneeboard would likely have a lower maximum desired tilt than would use with an electronic device on a non-portable table where users might want a nearly vertical screen. Height of the user and distance from the lap table or electronic device would also be a factor in determining the optimal tilt desired. Further different aircraft configurations will cause people to sit differently in the cockpit and hence may also affect the location of attachment to the thigh and the amount of tilt desired for optimal viewing and manipulation of the items supported on a kneeboard. Kneeboard viewing has primary concerns of reducing or eliminating glare on supported devices, of maintaining a position for the devices that will not interfere with yoke and other control instrument usage, and will be visible despite any items in the craft that may reduce the field of vision. The adjacent surfaces might also have patterns of raised pieces for similar reasons. Alternatively, the rolled tilt device/flexible layer could have a continuous layer of attachable material while the adjacent surfaces would have the tilt level determining pattern of raised pieces.
In the preceding detailed description, reference has been made to the accompanying figures which illustrate specific embodiments of the presented invention. These embodiments and variants thereof have been described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the described invention. As would be evident to those skilled in the art, the preceding detailed description is not limited to the specifics of the embodiments described but rather is intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as can reasonably be included within the spirit and scope of the described invention and the appended claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2420673 | Monrad | May 1947 | A |
| 3791314 | Berretta | Feb 1974 | A |
| 4034947 | Geisel | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4577788 | Richardson | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4664039 | Schneider | May 1987 | A |
| 4762258 | Murphy | Aug 1988 | A |
| 5105338 | Held | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5366070 | Wolov | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5537793 | Murasaki | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5607091 | Musacchia | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5639004 | Carlton et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5713548 | Boyer et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5762250 | Carlton et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5819344 | Otts | Oct 1998 | A |
| 6435466 | Adams | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6926244 | O'Neill | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 7048243 | Steinman | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7481409 | Reynolds | Jan 2009 | B1 |
| 7980526 | Lord et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8038114 | Ting | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8328056 | Berdych | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 20060113342 | Hampton et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20080006749 | Ferritto | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20090178592 | Hu | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20100219320 | Knych | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150053120 A1 | Feb 2015 | US |