1. Field of the Invention
One or more embodiments of the invention are related to the image processing. More particularly, but not by way of limitation, one or more embodiments of the invention enable a tilt-based look around effect image enhancement method that enables two-dimensional images to be depth enhanced and displayed for example from a different point of view based on the tilt or orientation, and/or movement of the viewing device itself. Embodiments may further alter or otherwise utilize different parallax maps to apply depth to the image based on the display type, e.g., two-dimensional or stereoscopic display. In addition, embodiments may display information foreign to the image when portions of the image are exposed during the look around effect, including advertisements, game information, hyperlinks or any other data not originally in the image.
2. Description of the Related Art
Depth capable image displays present different image information to be viewed based on the angle at which a viewer is situated with respect to the display. A “look around effect” occurs as the viewer moves to a different position wherein the display provides different image information based on the point of view of the observer.
One format for viewing images is a two-dimensional format, for example that may be viewed on a standard computer monitor. When moving about a two-dimensional display, an observer views the image as a flat, for example an image that is displayed in a plane, and otherwise without depth, although shading and lighting may give the observer a sense of depth for portions of the image. This is not considered a three-dimensional view of an image, but rather only a two-dimensional display. Two-dimensional medical imaging systems are the most common and lowest cost system.
Another format for viewing images is a three-dimensional format, however most three-dimensional imagery is displayed in an encoded format and projected onto a two-dimensional display. This enables three-dimensional viewing for example with anaglyph glasses or polarized glasses. Other displays may provide different information based on the orientation with respect to the display, e.g., autostereoscopic displays that do not require special glasses for viewing. An example of such as display is a lenticular display. Alternatively, two images that are shown alternately to the left and right eyes that may be viewed with shutter glasses. Any display type may be utilized for the look around effect as long as objects or portions thereof appear when viewed from one orientation that are not visible from another orientation. Many types of three-dimensional systems are more expensive than existing two-dimensional imaging systems. All known types of displays capable of observing the look around effect require the observer to move around the display to observe the effect.
What is unknown in the art is a tilt-based look around effect image enhancement method that enables two-dimensional images to be depth enhanced and viewed for example from a different point of view based on the tilt of the viewing device itself. This would enable tablet computers and mobile devices to display the effect with standard two-dimensional display technology. For at least the limitations described above there is a need for a tilt-based look around effect image enhancement method.
One or more embodiments described in the specification are related to a tilt-based look around effect image enhancement method. Thus, embodiments of the invention enable display of a look around effect applied to two-dimensional images to provide a sense of depth and inner image relative movement of near and distant portions of the image based on tilt or orientation, or for example movement in the plane parallel to the display or away from the plane parallel to the display. Although embodiments of the invention may utilize two-dimensional displays, embodiments may also display images on stereoscopic displays, for example for viewing with or without three-dimensional viewing glasses.
One or more embodiments of the method include a tilt-based look around effect image enhancement method that includes obtaining an orientation of a display with respect to a reference frame from an orientation element physically associated with the display. This enables tilting a two-dimensional or stereoscopic display, for example on a tablet or mobile computer, to show motion of foreground objects, and in effect show the image from a different point of view. Embodiments of the method further include obtaining a parallax map associated with an image wherein the parallax map includes at least two different depth values associated with at least two different pixels of the image respectively. The parallax map in at least one embodiment may contain maximum pixel motion values for maximum tilt or orientation or movement, for example based on normalized parallax values. Embodiments of the method also include moving at least one of the at least two pixels in the image to at least one new pixel location based on the orientation of the display with respect to the reference frame and/or based on movement of the display, and based on the parallax map. This enables the “nearest” pixels to move the most in general on the display when the display is tilted or moved for example. In one or more embodiments, the display type, e.g., two-dimensional or stereoscopic display may be utilized to enhance the parallax map in multiple ways depending on how the display is configured currently to display the image. In one or more embodiments, certain types of displays may be configured to display two-dimensional data, or pairs of images or encoded images for viewing with the left and right eye, for example with or without special viewing glasses. Embodiments of the method include displaying the image on the display including the at least one pixel in the image in the at least one new pixel location. The image may thus be viewed from a different point of view.
In one or more embodiments, the obtaining of the orientation of the display with respect to the reference frame includes obtaining an orientation vector from the orientation element. Some electronic devices include an orientation element that for example may provide a three-dimensional vector which indicates the direction relative to the display plane, e.g., normal to the plane in which the displays is situated. In this scenario, embodiments of the invention may determine the reference plane from which movement is related to, so as to calculate the amount of tilt about the horizontal axis, the tilt about the vertical axis, or the X and Y axes respectively. Alternatively, or in combination, embodiments of the invention may also be configured such that the obtaining of the orientation of the display with respect to the reference frame includes obtaining at least one acceleration value or angular value or both from the orientation element. This for example may be the case if the electronic device having the display includes an accelerometer or gyroscope, which are commonly provided in MEMS or Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems packaging. Some types of electronic devices may utilize an accelerometer to provide an orientation vector as part of an Application Programming Interface. In at least one embodiment, the obtaining of the orientation of the display with respect to the reference frame includes obtaining the orientation with respect to a vector associated with gravity. In this scenario, the initial frame of reference from which to apply the look around effect is the vertical display orientation, or an angular offset thereof for example. In other embodiments, the user may assert an input that is obtained by the electronic device to signify the desired initial frame of reference. This enables the obtaining of the orientation of the display with respect to the reference frame to include obtaining the orientation with respect to an initial reference frame of the display at a particular point in time. One or more embodiments may include modifying the frame of reference over time, for example with a time averaged or time weighted function applied to orientation vector samples. This allows for a new orientation that has been applied to the display to be the starting point for further look around effect movements. This may also be utilized to apply a momentum type effect to the movement so that the image continues to move for a defined amount of time after an orientation change.
One or more embodiments may include normalizing a depth map having depth values for the at least two different pixels of the image to create the parallax map. The parallax map associated with an image for example may be encoded for the amount of pixel movement to apply to a 90 degree or full tilt for example of the display in the X or Y axes or both for example. Although a depth map, for example +10 to −5 may be utilized and calculations may be undertaken to determine a viewpoint and amount of pixel movement, the parallax map encodes on a pixel-by-pixel basis the amount of movement to minimize the processing required on the electronic device. This also lowers processing power requirements and battery requirements as well.
In addition, embodiments of the invention may also include altering values of the parallax map to exaggerate depth values. This may be performed in multiple manners, or for example using a strategy pattern to apply different exaggeration amounts based on the type of the display, e.g., two-dimensional which enjoys advantages for look around effect with higher exaggerations, or stereoscopic which in general provides enough three-dimensional effect by an of itself to warrant more limited movement nearer objects, e.g., less movement of foreground pixels. For example, one or more embodiments may include altering values of the parallax map to provide to a two-dimensional display to exaggerate depth values, for example based on a squared or cubed or higher power for example to accentuate the effect. One or more embodiments may include altering values of the parallax map to provide to a stereoscopic display to exaggerate depth values, for example as a linear or smaller relative power compared to the two-dimensional exaggerated values since the stereoscopic effect provides an easier to view look around effect for some viewers. Any other functions may be utilized to display images on different display types, and the functions may be dynamically switched when the display type is switched from two-dimensional to three-dimensional viewing or visa versa for example.
Embodiments may include altering values of the parallax map based on a display based on two different functions respectively based on a display output type associated with the display depending on whether the display is currently configured to display two-dimensional images or stereoscopic images. This enables the same image to be viewed with look around effect in different ways and dynamically switching between types with the display type is switched on the device as well.
Embodiments may include obtaining a percentage of full tilt based on the orientation vector with respect to the reference frame and multiplying the percentage of full tilt by the parallax map to obtain a pixel-by-pixel amount of movement to utilize in moving the at least one pixel in the image. The multiply function may be linear or non-linear in that any function or ramp of any shape may also be utilized in the multiply operation to may slight movements more or less visible to a viewer of the display. One or more embodiments may include obtaining a percentage of full tilt based on the orientation vector with respect to the reference frame over time and multiplying the percentage of full tilt by the parallax map to obtain a pixel-by-pixel amount of movement to utilize in moving the at least one pixel in the image over time. This enables the tilt vector to have a momentum like effect of continuing to move in a smoother manner for example between two orientations.
Embodiments of the invention may also include obtaining a percentage of full tilt based on the orientation vector with respect to the reference frame in at least two dimensions orthogonal from each other and parallel to a plane defined by the display. Embodiments may include calculating a movement direction based on the percentage in each of two the directions and also include multiplying the percentage of full tilt by the parallax map in the movement direction to obtain a pixel-by-pixel amount of movement to utilize in moving the at least one pixel in the image. Alternatively, embodiments may include obtaining a percentage of full tilt based on the orientation vector or movement with respect to the reference frame in two dimensions orthogonal from each other and parallel to a plane defined by the display, and based on movement in a third dimension not parallel to the plane defined by the display. Embodiments in this translation scenario may include calculating a movement direction based on the percentage in each of two the directions, multiplying the percentage of full tilt by the parallax map in the movement direction to obtain a pixel-by-pixel amount of movement to utilize in moving the at least one pixel in the image and either translating the image based on the movement with respect to the reference frame in two dimensions or translating the image based on the movement in the third dimension or both translating in the two dimensions and in the third dimension as well.
Embodiments of the invention may also include revealing information foreign to the image and hidden by foreground objects wherein the information includes an advertisement, gaming information such as a game clue or prize, or a hyperlink or any other information that is hidden in the image until the image is viewed from a different point of view based on the tilt, or translation for example.
Embodiments may also include compositing at least two images to form the image. This enables multiple cards or images to be combined into a final output image and other wise enables multiple separate images to be independently generated and depth augmented and later combined, for example with optional depth normalization between the multiple images.
Embodiments of the invention include displaying the image on a two-dimensional display and/or generating a left eye viewpoint image and a right eye viewpoint image and displaying the left eye viewpoint image and the right eye viewpoint image on a stereoscopic display and/or generating an encoded three-dimensional image and displaying the encoded image for three-dimensional viewing with or without three-dimensional viewing glasses.
The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
The above and other aspects, features and advantages of the invention will be more apparent from the following more particular description thereof, presented in conjunction with the following drawings wherein:
A tilt-based look around effect image enhancement method will now be described. In the following exemplary description numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a more thorough understanding of embodiments of the invention. It will be apparent, however, to an artisan of ordinary skill that the present invention may be practiced without incorporating all aspects of the specific details described herein. In other instances, specific features, quantities, or measurements well known to those of ordinary skill in the art have not been described in detail so as not to obscure the invention. Readers should note that although examples of the invention are set forth herein, the claims, and the full scope of any equivalents, are what define the metes and bounds of the invention.
In addition, embodiments of the invention may also include altering values of the parallax map to exaggerate depth values. This may be performed in multiple manners, or for example using a strategy pattern to apply different exaggeration amounts based on the type of the display, e.g., two-dimensional which enjoys advantages for look around effect with higher exaggerations, or stereoscopic which in general provides enough three-dimensional effect by an of itself to warrant more limited movement nearer objects, e.g., less movement of foreground pixels. For example, one or more embodiments may include altering values of the parallax map 501 to provide parallax map 503 for use with a two-dimensional display to exaggerate depth values using an equation such as
zz=((h−g)*(1−power((1−z)/(1−h/(h−g)),1/0.3)))+g
wherein
g=minimum depth value associated with an input depth map associated with the image,
h=maximum depth value associated with the input depth map associated with the image,
z=input parallax map value, and
zz=output parallax map value.
One or more embodiments may include altering values of the parallax map 501 to provide parallax map 502 for use with a stereoscopic display to exaggerate depth values using an equation such as
zz=((h−g)*z)+g
These exemplary equations may be utilized but are not intended to be limiting as other functions with more or less exaggeration may be utilized to provide the amount of look around effect desired for the particular display type or application as one skilled in the art will recognize.
Embodiments may include altering values of the parallax map based on a display based on two different functions respectively based on a display output type associated with the display depending on whether the display is currently configured to display two-dimensional images or stereoscopic images. This enables the same image to be viewed with look around effect in different ways and dynamically switching between types with the display type is switched on the device as well.
In one or more embodiments, the obtaining of the orientation of the display with respect to the reference frame includes obtaining an orientation vector from the orientation element 602, for example via processor 601. Some electronic devices include an orientation element that for example may provide a three-dimensional vector which indicates the direction relative to the display plane, e.g., normal to the plane in which the displays is situated. In this scenario, embodiments of the invention may determine the reference plane from which movement is related to, so as to calculate the amount of tilt about the horizontal axis, the tilt about the vertical axis, or the X and Y axes respectively. Alternatively, or in combination, embodiments of the invention may also be configured such that the obtaining of the orientation of the display with respect to the reference frame includes obtaining at least one acceleration value or angular value or both from the orientation element 602. This for example may be the case if the electronic device having the display includes an accelerometer or gyroscope, which are commonly provided in MEMS or Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems packaging. Some types of electronic devices may utilize an accelerometer to provide an orientation vector as part of an Application Programming Interface. In at least one embodiment, the obtaining of the orientation of the display with respect to the reference frame includes obtaining the orientation with respect to a vector associated with gravity, for example vertically down or orthogonal to the plane of the horizon. In this scenario, the initial frame of reference from which to apply the look around effect is the vertical display orientation, or an angular offset thereof for example 15 degrees tilted back at a normal viewing angle. In other embodiments, the user may assert an input that is obtained by the electronic device to signify the desired initial frame of reference. This enables the obtaining of the orientation of the display with respect to the reference frame to include obtaining the orientation with respect to an initial reference frame of the display at a particular point in time, for example after touching the screen or on application startup, etc. One or more embodiments may include modifying the frame of reference over time, for example with a time averaged or time weighted function applied to orientation vector samples. This allows for a new orientation that has been applied to the display to be the starting point for further look around effect movements. This may also be utilized to apply a momentum type effect to the movement so that the image continues to move for a defined amount of time after an orientation change. In one or more embodiments the average may be utilized such as the sum of orientation vectors divided by the number of orientation vectors to determine the averaged orientation vector. Any other function may be utilized to weight the more recent vectors more or less heavily for example to provide different effects, including overshoot.
Embodiments may include obtaining a percentage of full tilt based on the orientation vector with respect to the reference frame and multiplying the percentage of full tilt by the parallax map to obtain a pixel-by-pixel amount of movement to utilize in moving the at least one pixel in the image. The multiply function may be linear or non-linear in that any function or ramp of any shape may also be utilized in the multiply operation to may slight movements more or less visible to a viewer of the display. One or more embodiments may include obtaining a percentage of full tilt based on the orientation vector with respect to the reference frame over time and multiplying the percentage of full tilt by the parallax map to obtain a pixel-by-pixel amount of movement to utilize in moving the at least one pixel in the image over time. This enables the tilt vector to have a momentum like effect of continuing to move in a smoother manner for example between two orientations. For example as shown in the top portion of
Embodiments of the invention may also include obtaining a percentage of full tilt based on the orientation vector with respect to the reference frame in at least two dimensions orthogonal from each other and parallel to a plane defined by the display. Embodiments may include calculating a movement direction based on the percentage in each of two the directions and also include multiplying the percentage of full tilt by the parallax map in the movement direction to obtain a pixel-by-pixel amount of movement to utilize in moving the at least one pixel in the image. Alternatively, embodiments may include obtaining a percentage of full tilt based on the orientation vector or movement with respect to the reference frame in two dimensions orthogonal from each other and parallel to a plane defined by the display, and based on movement in a third dimension not parallel to the plane defined by the display. Embodiments in this translation scenario may include calculating a movement direction based on the percentage in each of two the directions, multiplying the percentage of full tilt by the parallax map in the movement direction to obtain a pixel-by-pixel amount of movement to utilize in moving the at least one pixel in the image and either translating the image based on the movement with respect to the reference frame in two dimensions or translating the image based on the movement in the third dimension or both translating the image in two dimensions and also the third dimension. For example, if the display is moved 1 foot closer to the user, and the translation factor is normalized to 2 feet, then the image may be translated by the maximum factor multiplied by ½. The entire image is then scaled by this amount and displayed for example as shown in
Embodiments of the invention may also include revealing information foreign to the image such as foreign information 650 and hidden by foreground objects wherein the information includes an advertisement, gaming information such as a game clue or prize, or a hyperlink or any other information that is hidden in the image until the image is viewed from a different point of view based on the tilt, or translation for example. This enables enhanced advertisement, gaming and reading for example and provides opportunities for businesses to capitalize on enhanced look around features for, but not limited to marketing, gaming and publication related businesses.
Embodiments may also include compositing at least two images to form the image. This enables multiple cards or sub-images to be combined into a final output image and other wise enables multiple separate images to be independently generated and depth augmented and later combined, for example with optional depth normalization between the multiple images. As shown in
Embodiments of the invention include displaying the image on a two-dimensional display (see
While the invention herein disclosed has been described by means of specific embodiments and applications thereof, numerous modifications and variations could be made thereto by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention set forth in the claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2593925 | Sheldon | Apr 1952 | A |
| 2799722 | Neugebauer | Jul 1957 | A |
| 2804500 | Giacoletto | Aug 1957 | A |
| 2874212 | Bechley | Feb 1959 | A |
| 2883763 | Schaper | Apr 1959 | A |
| 2974190 | Fine et al. | Mar 1961 | A |
| 3005042 | Horsley | Oct 1961 | A |
| 3258528 | Oppenheimer | Jun 1966 | A |
| 3486242 | Aronson | Dec 1969 | A |
| 3551589 | Moskoviz | Dec 1970 | A |
| 3558811 | Montevecchio et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
| 3560644 | Petrocelli et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
| 3595987 | Vlahos | Jul 1971 | A |
| 3603962 | Lechner | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3612755 | Tadlock | Oct 1971 | A |
| 3617626 | Bluth et la. | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3619051 | Wright | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3621127 | Hope | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3657942 | Sullivan | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3673317 | Newell | Jun 1972 | A |
| 3705762 | Ladd et al. | Dec 1972 | A |
| 3706841 | Novak | Dec 1972 | A |
| 3710011 | Altemus et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
| 3731995 | Reiffel | May 1973 | A |
| 3737567 | Kratomi | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3742125 | Siegel | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3761607 | Hanseman | Sep 1973 | A |
| 3769458 | Driskell | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3770884 | Curran et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3770885 | Curran et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3772465 | Vlahos et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3784736 | Novak | Jan 1974 | A |
| 3848856 | Reeber et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
| 3851955 | Kent et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
| 3971068 | Gerhardt et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
| 3972067 | Peters | Jul 1976 | A |
| 4017166 | Kent et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
| 4021841 | Weinger | May 1977 | A |
| 4021846 | Roese | May 1977 | A |
| 4054904 | Saitoh et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
| 4149185 | Weinger | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4168885 | Kent et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
| 4183046 | Daike et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4183633 | Kent et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4189743 | Schure et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4189744 | Stern | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4235503 | Condon | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4258385 | Greenberg et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4318121 | Taite et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4329710 | Taylor | May 1982 | A |
| 4334240 | Franklin | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4436369 | Bukowski | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4475104 | Shen | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4544247 | Ohno | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4549172 | Welk | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4558359 | Kuperman et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4563703 | Taylor | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4590511 | Bocchi et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4600919 | Stern | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4603952 | Sybenga | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4606625 | Geshwind | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4608596 | Williams et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4617592 | MacDonald | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4642676 | Weinger | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4645459 | Graf et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4647965 | Imsand | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4694329 | Belmares-Sarabia et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4697178 | Heckel | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4700181 | Maine et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4721951 | Holler | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4723159 | Imsand | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4725879 | Eide et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4755870 | Markle et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4758908 | James | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4760390 | Maine et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4774583 | Kellar et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4794382 | Lai et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4809065 | Harris et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4827255 | Ishii | May 1989 | A |
| 4847689 | Yamamoto et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4862256 | Markle et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4888713 | Falk | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4903131 | Lingemann et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4918624 | Moore et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4925294 | Geshwind et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4933670 | Wislocki | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4952051 | Lovell et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4965844 | Oka et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4984072 | Sandrew | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5002387 | Baljet et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5038161 | Ki | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5050984 | Geshwind | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5055939 | Karamon et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5093717 | Sandrew | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5177474 | Kadota | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5181181 | Glynn | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5185852 | Mayer | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5237647 | Roberts et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5243460 | Kornberg | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5252953 | Sandrew | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5262856 | Lippman et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5328073 | Blanding et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5341462 | Obata | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5347620 | Zimmer | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5363476 | Kurashige et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5402191 | Dean et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5428721 | Sato et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5481321 | Lipton | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5495576 | Ritchey | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5528655 | Umetani et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5534915 | Sandrew | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5668605 | Nachshon et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5673081 | Yamashita et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5682437 | Okino et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5684715 | Palmer | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5699443 | Murata et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5699444 | Palm | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5717454 | Adolphi et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5729471 | Jain et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5734915 | Roewer | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5739844 | Kuwano et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5742291 | Palm | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5748199 | Palm | May 1998 | A |
| 5767923 | Coleman | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5777666 | Tanase et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5778108 | Coleman | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5784175 | Lee | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5784176 | Narita | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5808664 | Yamashita et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5825997 | Yamada et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5835163 | Liou et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5841512 | Goodhill | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5867169 | Prater | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5880788 | Bregler | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5899861 | Friemel et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5907364 | Furuhata et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5912994 | Norton et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5920360 | Coleman | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5929859 | Meijers | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5940528 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5959697 | Coleman | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5973700 | Taylor et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5973831 | Kleinberger et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5982350 | Hekmatpour et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5990900 | Seago | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5990903 | Donovan | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6005582 | Gabriel et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6011581 | Swift et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6014473 | Hossack et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6023276 | Kawai et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6025882 | Geshwind | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6031564 | Ma et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6049628 | Chen et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6056691 | Urbano et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6067125 | May | May 2000 | A |
| 6086537 | Urbano et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6088006 | Tabata | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6091421 | Terrasson | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6102865 | Hossack et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6108005 | Starks et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6118584 | Van Berkel et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6119123 | Dimitrova et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6132376 | Hossack et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141433 | Moed et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6157747 | Szeliski et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6166744 | Jaszlics et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6173328 | Sato | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6184937 | Williams et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6198484 | Kameyama | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6201900 | Hossack et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6208348 | Kaye | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6211941 | Erland | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6215516 | Ma et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6222948 | Hossack et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6226015 | Danneels et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6228030 | Urbano et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6263101 | Klein | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6271859 | Asente | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6314211 | Kim et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6329963 | Chiabrera et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6337709 | Yamaashi et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6360027 | Hossack et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6364835 | Hossack et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6373970 | Dong et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6390980 | Peterson et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6405366 | Lorenz et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6414678 | Goddard et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6416477 | Jago | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6429867 | Deering | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6445816 | Pettigrew | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6456340 | Margulis | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6466205 | Simpson et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6477267 | Richards | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6492986 | Metaxas et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6496598 | Harman | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6509926 | Mills et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6515659 | Kaye et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6535233 | Smith | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6553184 | Ando et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6590573 | Geshwind | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6606166 | Knoll | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6611268 | Szeliski et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6650339 | Silva et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6662357 | Bowman-Amuah | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6665798 | McNally et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6677944 | Yamamoto | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6686591 | Ito et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6686926 | Kaye | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6707487 | Amand et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6727938 | Randall | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6737957 | Petrovic et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6744461 | Wada et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6765568 | Swift et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6791542 | Matusik et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6798406 | Jones et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6813602 | Thyssen | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6847737 | Kouri et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6850252 | Hoffberg | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6853383 | Duquesnois | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6859523 | Jilk et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6919892 | Cheiky et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6964009 | Samaniego et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6965379 | Lee et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6973434 | Miller | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6985187 | Han et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7000223 | Knutson et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7006881 | Hoffberg et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7027054 | Cheiky et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7032177 | Novak et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7035451 | Harman et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7079075 | Connor et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7098910 | Petrovic et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7102633 | Kaye et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7116323 | Kaye et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7116324 | Kaye et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7117231 | Fischer et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7136075 | Hamburg | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7181081 | Sandrew | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7190496 | Klug et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7254264 | Naske et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7254265 | Naske et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7260274 | Sawhney et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7272265 | Kouri et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7298094 | Yui | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7308139 | Wentland et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7321374 | Naske | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7327360 | Petrovic et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7333519 | Sullivan et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7333670 | Sandrew | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7343082 | Cote et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7461002 | Crockett et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7512262 | Criminisi et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7519990 | Xie | Apr 2009 | B1 |
| 7532225 | Fukushima et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7538768 | Kiyokawa et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7542034 | Spooner et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7573475 | Sullivan et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7573489 | Davidson et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7576332 | Britten | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7577312 | Sandrew | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7610155 | Timmis et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7624337 | Sull et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7630533 | Ruth et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7663689 | Marks | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7680653 | Yeldener | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7772532 | Olsen et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7894633 | Harman | Feb 2011 | B1 |
| 8085339 | Marks | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8217931 | Lowe et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 20010025267 | Janiszewski | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010051913 | Vashistha et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020001045 | Ranganath et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020048395 | Harman et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049778 | Bell | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020063780 | Harman et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020075384 | Harman | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20030018608 | Rice | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030046656 | Saxana | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030069777 | Or-Bach | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093790 | Logan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097423 | Ozawa et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030154299 | Hamilton | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030177024 | Tsuchida | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040004616 | Konya et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040062439 | Cahill et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181444 | Sandrew | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040189796 | Ho et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040258089 | Derechin et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050088515 | Geng | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050104878 | Kaye et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050146521 | Kaye et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050188297 | Knight et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050207623 | Liu et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050231501 | Nitawaki | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050231505 | Kaye et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050280643 | Chen | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060028543 | Sohn et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060061583 | Spooner et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060274905 | Lindahl et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070052807 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070260634 | Makela et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070279412 | Davidson et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070279415 | Sullivan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070296721 | Chang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080044155 | Kuspa | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080079851 | Stanger et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080117233 | Mather et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080147917 | Lees et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080162577 | Fukuda et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080181486 | Spooner et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080225040 | Simmons et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080225042 | Birtwistle et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080225045 | Birtwistle | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080225059 | Lowe et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080226123 | Birtwistle | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080226128 | Birtwistle et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080226160 | Birtwistle et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080226181 | Birtwistle et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080226194 | Birtwistle et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080227075 | Poor et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080228449 | Birtwistle et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080246759 | Summers | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080246836 | Lowe et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080259073 | Lowe et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090002368 | Vitikainen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090033741 | Oh et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090116732 | Zhou et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090219383 | Passmore | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090256903 | Spooner et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090303204 | Nasiri et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100045666 | Kornmann et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100259610 | Petersen | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20110050864 | Bond | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110074784 | Turner | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110169827 | Spooner et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110169914 | Lowe et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110188773 | Wei et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110227917 | Lowe et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110273531 | Ito et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120032948 | Lowe et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120087570 | Seo et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120102435 | Han et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120188334 | Fortin et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120274626 | Hsieh | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120281906 | Appia | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130051659 | Yamamoto | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 003444353 | Dec 1986 | DE |
| 0302454 | Aug 1989 | EP |
| 1187494 | Mar 2002 | EP |
| 2487039 | Nov 2012 | GB |
| 60-52190 | Mar 1985 | JP |
| 2003046982 | Feb 2003 | JP |
| 2004207985 | Jul 2004 | JP |
| 20120095059 | Feb 2012 | KR |
| 20130061289 | Nov 2013 | KR |
| 1192168 | Sep 1982 | SU |
| 9724000 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| 9912127 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| 9930280 | Jun 1999 | WO |
| 0079781 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| 0101348 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| 0213143 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| 2006078237 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| 2008075276 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| 2011029209 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| 2012016600 | Sep 2012 | WO |
| 2013084234 | Jun 2013 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| European Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2013, received for EP Appl. No. 02734203.9 on Jul. 22, 2013, 5 pages. |
| Tam et al., “3D-TV Content Generation: 2D-To-3D Conversion”, ICME 2006, p. 1868-1872. |
| Harman et al. “Rapid 2D to 3D Conversion”, The Reporter, vol. 17, No. 1, Feb. 2002, 12 pages. |
| Legend Films, “System and Method for Conversion of Sequences of Two-Dimensional Medical Images to Three-Dimensional Images” Sep. 12, 2013, 7 pages. |
| McKenna “Interactive Viewpoint Control and Three-Dimensional Operations”, Computer Graphics and Animation Group, The Media Laboratory, pp. 53-56, 1992. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued for PCT/US2013/072447, dated Mar. 13, 2014, 6 pages. |
| Noll, Computer-Generated Three-Dimensional Movies, Computers and Automation, vol. 14, No. 11 (Nov. 1965), pp. 20-23. |
| Noll, Stereographic Projections by Digital Computer, Computers and Automation, vol. 14, No. 5 (May 1965), pp. 32-34. |
| Australian Office Action issued for 2002305387, dated Mar. 15, 2007, 2 page. |
| Canadian Office Action, Dec. 28, 2011, Appl No. 2,446,150, 4 pages. |
| Canadian Office Action, Oct. 8, 2010, App. No. 2,446,150, 6 pages. |
| Canadian Office Action, Jun. 13, 2011, App. No. 2,446,150, 4 pages. |
| Daniel L. Symmes, Three-Dimensional Image, Microsoft Encarta Online Encyclopedia (hard copy printed May 28, 2008 and of record, now indicated by the website indicated on the document to be discontinued: http://encarta.msn.com/text—761584746—0/Three-Dimensional—Image.html). |
| Declaration of Barbara Frederiksen in Support of In-Three, Inc's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Aug. 1, 2005, IMAX Corporation et al v. In-Three, Inc., Case No. CV05 1795 FMC (Mcx). (25 pages). |
| Declaration of John Marchioro, Exhibit C, 3 pages, Nov. 2, 2007. |
| Declaration of Michael F. Chou, Exhibit B, 12 pages, Nov. 2, 2007. |
| Declaration of Steven K. Feiner, Exhibit A, 10 pages, Nov. 2, 2007. |
| Di Zhong, Shih-Fu Chang, “AMOS: An Active System for MPEG-4 Video Object Segmentation,” ICIP (2) 8: 647-651, Apr. 1998. |
| E. N. Mortensen and W. A. Barrett, “Intelligent Scissors for Image Composition,” Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH '95), pp. 191-198, Los Angeles, CA, Aug. 1995. |
| EPO Office Action issued for EP Appl. No. 02734203.9, dated Sep. 12, 2006, 4 pages. |
| EPO Office Action issued for EP Appl. No. 02734203.9, dated Oct. 7, 2010, 5 pages. |
| Eric N. Mortensen, William A. Barrett, “Interactive segmentation with Intelligent Scissors,” Graphical Models and Image Processing, v.60 n.5, p. 349-384, Sep. 2002. |
| Exhibit 1 to Declaration of John Marchioro, Revised translation of portions of Japanese Patent Document No. 60-52190 to Hiromae, 3 pages, Nov. 2, 2007. |
| Gao et al., Perceptual Motion Tracking from Image Sequences, IEEE, Jan. 2001, pp. 389-392. |
| Grossman, “Look Ma, No Glasses”, Games, Apr. 1992, pp. 12-14. |
| Hanrahan et al., “Direct WYSIWYG painting and texturing on 3D shapes”, Computer Graphics, vol. 24, Issue 4, pp. 215-223. Aug. 1990. |
| Hua Zhong, et al., “Interactive Tracker—A Semi-automatic Video Object Tracking and Segmentation System,” Microsoft Research China, http://research.microsoft.com (Aug. 26, 2003). |
| Indian Office Action issued for Appl. No. 49/DELNP/2005, dated Apr. 4, 2007, 9 pages. |
| Interpolation (from Wikipedia encyclopedia, article pp. 1-6) retrieved from Internet URL:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpolation on Jun. 5, 2008. |
| IPER, Mar. 29, 2007, PCT/US2005/014348, 5 pages. |
| IPER, Oct. 5, 2012, PCT/US2011/058182, 6 pages. |
| International Search Report, Jun. 13, 2003, PCT/US02/14192, 4 pages. |
| PCT Search Report issued for PCT/US2011/058182, dated May 10, 2012, 8 pages. |
| PCT Search Report issued for PCT/US2011/067024, dated Aug. 22, 2012, 10 pages. |
| Izquierdo et al., Virtual 3D-View Generation from Stereoscopic Video Data, IEEE, Jan. 1998, pp. 1219-1224. |
| Jul. 21, 2005, Partial Testimony, Expert: Samuel Zhou, Ph.D., 2005 WL 3940225 (C.D.Cal.), 21 pages. |
| Kaufman, D., “The Big Picture”, Apr. 1998, http://www.xenotech.com Apr. 1998, pp. 1-4. |
| Lenny Lipton, “Foundations of the Stereo-Scopic Cinema, a Study in Depth” With and Appendix on 3D Television, 325 pages, May 1978. |
| Lenny Lipton, Foundations of the Stereo-Scopic Cinema A Study in Depth, 1982, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company. |
| Machine translation of JP Patent No. 2004-207985, dated Jul. 22, 2008, 34 pg. |
| Michael Gleicher, “Image Snapping,” SIGGRAPH: 183-190, Jun. 1995. |
| Murray et al., Active Tracking, IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Sep. 1993, pp. 1021-1028. |
| Ohm et al., An Object-Based System for Stereopscopic Viewpoint Synthesis, IEEE transaction on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 7, No. 5, Oct. 1997, pp. 801-811. |
| Optical Reader (from Wikipedia encyclopedia, article p. 1) retrieved from Internet URL:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical—reader on Jun. 5, 2008. |
| Selsis et al., Automatic Tracking and 3D Localization of Moving Objects by Active Contour Models, Intelligent Vehicles 95 Symposium, Sep. 1995, pp. 96-100. |
| Slinker et al., “The Generation and Animation of Random Dot and Random Line Autostereograms”, Journal of Imaging Science and Technology, vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 260-267, May 1992. |
| Nguyen et al., Tracking Nonparameterized Object Contours in Video, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 11, No. 9, Sep. 2002, pp. 1081-1091. |
| U.S. District Court, C.D. California, IMAX Corporation and Three-Dimensional Media Group, Ltd., v. In-Three, Inc., Partial Testimony, Expert: Samuel Zhou, Ph.D., No. CV 05-1795 FMC(Mcx), Jul. 19, 2005, WL 3940223 (C.D.Cal.), 6 pages. |
| U.S. District Court, C.D. California, IMAX v. In-Three, No. 05 CV 1795, 2005, Partial Testimony, Expert: David Geshwind, WestLaw 2005, WL 3940224 (C.D.Cal.), 8 pages. |
| U.S. District Court, C.D. California, Western Division, IMAX Corporation, and Three-Dimensional Media Group, Ltd. v. In-Three, Inc., No. CV05 1795 FMC (Mcx). Jul. 18, 2005. Declaration of Barbara Frederiksen in Support of In-Three, Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 2005 WL 5434580 (C.D.Cal.), 13 pages. |
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, Ex Parte Three-Dimensional Media Group, Ltd., Appeal 2009-004087, Reexamination Control No. 90/007,578, US Patent No. 4,925,294, Decis200, 88 pages, Jul. 30, 2010. |
| USPTO, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, Decision on Appeal dated Jul. 30, 2010, Ex parte Three-Dimensional Media Group, Ltd., Appeal 2009-004087, Reexamination Control No. 90/007,578, US Patent 4,925,294. (88 pages). |
| Yasushi Mae, et al., “Object Tracking in Cluttered Background Based on Optical Flow and Edges,” Proc. 13th Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, pp. 196-200, Apr. 1996. |
| PCT ISR, Feb. 27, 2007, PCT/US2005/014348, 8 pages. |
| PCT ISR, Sep. 11, 2007, PCT/US07/62515, 9 pages. |
| PCT ISR, Nov. 14, 2007, PCT/US07/62515, 24 pages. |
| PCT IPRP, Jul. 4, 2013, PCT/US2011/067024, 5 pages. |
| Joseph Weber, et al., “Rigid Body Segmentation and Shape Description from Dense Optical Flow Under Weak Perspective,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 19, No. 2, Feb. 1997, pp. 139-143 |
| International Search Report Issued for PCT/US2013/072208, dated Feb. 27, 2014, 6 pages. |
| “Nintendo DSi Uses Camera Face Tracking to Create 3D Mirages”, retrieved from www.Gizmodo.com on Mar. 18, 2013, 3 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140267235 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |