Cutting tools are used in a variety of applications to cut or otherwise remove material from a workpiece. A variety of cutting tools are well known in the art, including but not limited to knives, scissors, shears, blades, chisels, machetes, saws, drill bits, etc.
A cutting tool often has one or more laterally extending, straight or curvilinear cutting edges along which pressure is applied to make a cut. The cutting edge is often defined along the intersection of opposing surfaces (bevels) that intersect along a line that lies along the cutting edge.
In some cutting tools, such as many types of conventional kitchen knives, the opposing surfaces are generally symmetric; other cutting tools, such as many types of scissors and chisels, have a first opposing surface that extends in a substantially normal direction, and a second opposing surface that is skewed with respect to the first surface.
Complex blade geometries can be used, such as multiple sets of bevels at different respective angles that taper to the cutting edge. Scallops or other discontinuous features can also be provided along the cutting edge, such as in the case of serrated knives.
Cutting tools can become dull over time after extended use, and thus it can be desirable to subject a dulled cutting tool to a sharpening operation to restore the cutting edge to a greater level of sharpness. A variety of sharpening techniques are known in the art, including the use of grinding wheels, whet stones, abrasive cloths, abrasive belts, etc.
Various embodiments of the present disclosure are generally directed to a sharpener for sharpening a cutting tool having a blade portion with a cutting edge, such as but not limited to a kitchen knife.
In some embodiments, the sharpener has first and second rollers, with the first roller rotatable about a first roller axis and the second roller rotatable about a second roller axis parallel to the first roller axis. An endless abrasive belt is arranged along a belt path that passes over the first and second rollers to define a planar segment that lies along a neutral plane from the first roller to the second roller. A guide assembly adjacent the planar segment of the belt is configured to contactingly engage the cutting edge of the cutting tool and apply a non-uniform surface pressure to a side of the cutting tool adjacent the cutting edge across a width of the belt.
In some embodiments, the non-uniform surface pressure is established by inducing tilt in the cutting edge relative to the belt. In other embodiments, the non-uniform surface pressure is established by inducing skew in the cutting edge relative to the belt. In yet further embodiments, the non-uniform surface pressure is established by using a support member which supports the belt in a position near the application of the cutting tool to the belt, the support member inducing localized skew of the belt.
These and other features and advantages of various embodiments can be understood with a review of the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Generally, so-called slack belt sharpening techniques can be used to sharpen the cutting edge of a cutting tool, such as a knife, using a power-driven endless abrasive belt. One non-limiting example of a slack belt powered sharpener is provided in U.S. Pat. No. 8,696,407, assigned to the assignee of the present application.
As discussed more fully in the '407 patent, slack belt sharpening generally involves using an unsupported expanse of abrasive belt to contactingly engage a cutting edge of a knife or other cutting tool at an appropriate presentation (bevel) angle to deform a portion of the belt out of a neutral plane (e.g., a planar extent of the belt extending between a pair of belt supports, such as rollers). The deflection of the belt generally induces a small twisting effect in relation to curvilinear changes in the cutting edge along the length of the knife.
In this way, a user can draw the cutting edge across the moving belt and the belt will automatically adjust to follow the contour of the cutting edge as it removes material along the blade portion of the knife. By applying respective sharpening operations to opposing sides of the blade, a sharpened cutting edge can be efficiently produced.
While operable, one limitation that has been found with these and other forms of slack-belt sharpeners is a non-uniform amount of material removal along the length of the blade (e.g., so called material take off, or MTO rate). Certain types of cutting tools, such as kitchen (“chef”) knives, tend to have a curvilinearly extending cutting edge with relatively small amounts of curvature near a handle of the knife and increasingly greater amounts of curvilinearity near the tip of the blade. In such knives, it has been found that the unsupported segment of the belt can tend to remove too little material at the base of the blade near the handle, and too much material near the tip. One factor that induces this variation is the amount of deflection (twist) induced in the belt; generally, the greater the deflection, the higher the localized surface pressure and higher the corresponding MTO rate.
It follows that some belt sharpening operations can result in a rounding of the tip of the blade rather than retaining the tip as a sharp, well defined point, as well as incomplete sharpening of the cutting edge immediately adjacent the handle. While the user may be able to mitigate these and other effects through controlled presentation and withdrawal of the blade across the belt, various embodiments of the present disclosure present a number of operative features that can promote easier, more consistent abrasive belt sharpening that reduces such variations in surface pressure and corresponding MTO rates during a sharpening operation.
As explained below, such features include the use of what is collectively and/or variously referred to herein as “tilted angle abrasive belt sharpening.” Generally, tilted angle abrasive belt sharpening, also referred to as “modified slack belt sharpening,” refers to a novel sharpener configuration and methodology that purposefully induces a selected non-orthogonal alignment between the cutting edge of the knife or other cutting tool with respect to the abrasive belt in order to better control surface pressures and corresponding MTO rates across the width of the belt. A variety of different approaches can be used to achieve this tilted sharpening effect.
In some embodiments, a presentation angle of the knife or other cutting tool is fixed at a selected non-orthogonal angle with respect to the axis of one or more rollers along which the endless abrasive belt is driven. This may be carried out by tilting the belt path in a “backward” direction so that the top of the belt path is moved in a direction away from the user and using a substantially horizontal set of edge guides to support the presentation of the tool. Another way in which the non-orthogonal angle can be established is by skewing the presentation angle of the knife inwardly with respect to the belt. Yet another way the non-orthogonal angle can be established is through the use of a backing support member the supports the belt in the vicinity of the contact zone. These respective approaches can be combined or used individually.
In each of these cases, surface pressures and corresponding MTO rates are controlled to enhance the sharpening process. Depending on the configuration, greater surface pressures and higher MTO rates can be supplied to the front edge of the belt (e.g., closer to the user or adjacent a proximal end of the tool) and lower surface pressures and lower MTO rates can be supplied to the rear edge of the belt (e.g., farther from the user or adjacent a distal end of the tool).
These and other features and advantages of various embodiments of the present disclosure can be understood beginning with a review of
The exemplary sharpener 100 is configured as a powered sharpener designed to rest on an underlying horizontal base surface, such as a table top, and to be powered by a source of electrical power such as residential or commercial alternating current (AC) voltage, a direct current (DC) battery pack, etc. Other forms of tilted angle abrasive belt sharpeners can be implemented, including hand-held sharpeners, non-powered sharpeners, etc. that employ the various features disclosed herein.
The sharpener 100 includes a rigid housing 102 that may be formed of a suitable rigid material such as but not limited to injection molded plastic. A user switch and power control module 104 includes one or more user operable switches (e.g., power, speed control, etc.) and power conversion circuitry to transfer electrical power to an electrical motor 106.
The motor 106 induces rotation of a shaft or other coupling member linked to a power transfer assembly (PTA) 108, which may include various mechanical elements such as gears, linkages, etc. which, in turn, impart rotation to one or more drive rollers 110. It is contemplated albeit not necessarily required that the drive roller 110 will rotate at a steady state rotational velocity during powered operation of the sharpener.
An endless abrasive belt 112 extends about the drive roller 110 and at least one additional idler roller 114. In some cases, multiple rollers may be employed by the sharpener, such as three or more rollers to define a segmented belt path. A tensioner 116 may impart a bias force to the idler roller 114 to supply a selected amount of tension to the belt. A guide assembly 118 is configured to enable a user to present a cutting tool such as a knife against a segment of the belt 112 between the respective rollers 110, 114 along a desired presentation orientation, as discussed below.
A schematic representation of the belt path is provided in
The belt 112 has an outer abrasive surface denoted generally at 122 and an inner backing layer denoted generally at 124 that supports the abrasive surface. These layers are shown more fully in
The exemplary arrangement of
Each segment 126, 128 is unsupported by a corresponding restrictive backing support member against the backing layer 124. This allows the respective segments to remain aligned along the respective neutral planes in an unloaded state and to be rotationally deflected (“twisted”) out of the neutral plane during a sharpening operation through contact with the knife. It is contemplated that one or more support members can be applied to the backing layer 128 in the vicinity of the segments 126, 128, such as in the form of a leaf spring, etc., so long as the support member(s) still enable the respective segments to be rotationally deflected away from the neutral plane during the modified slack-belt sharpening operation. A specially configured support member that provides controlled support to less than the full width of the belt will be discussed below.
An abrasive belt axis is represented by broken line 138 and indicates a direction of travel and alignment of the belt 112 during operation. The abrasive belt axis 138 is nominally orthogonal to the respective roller axes 110A, 114A of rollers 110, 114 (identified in the drawing as Roller Axes 1 and 2).
A pair of edge guide rollers are represented at 140, 142. The edge guide rollers form a portion of the aforementioned guide assembly 118 (see
Generally, the edge guide rollers 140, 142 provide a retraction path 144 for the blade 134 as the user draws the cutting edge across the belt 112 via the handle 132. The retraction path 144 is non-orthogonal to the abrasive belt axis 138. The intervening angle between lines 138 and 144 is referred to herein as a tilt angle, and is denoted in
A second angle, referred to herein as a bevel angle, is represented as angle B in
The magnitude of the tilt angle A can vary. In some embodiments, the tilt angle A as defined in
The magnitude of the bevel angle B can also vary. In some embodiments, the bevel angle B is selected to be in the range of from about 5 to about 15 degrees. The bevel angle generally determines the side geometry of the blade adjacent the cutting edge. For clarity, it will be appreciated that the conformal nature of the belt 112 will tend to impart a convex curvilinear shape to the side of the cutting edge rather than a flat “bevel” shape. Nevertheless, the term “bevel” is useful in generally denoting the relative orientation between the belt extent 126 and the blade 134.
The non-orthogonal tilt angle A is selected to reduce the deflection of the rear edge of the belt (e.g., that portion of the belt farthest from the handle) and to increase the deflection of the front edge of the belt (e.g., that portion of the belt closest to the handle). Tilting the belt with respect to the blade such as exemplified in
Referring again to
From
The particular configuration of the sharpener 100 (see
The relative tilt angle A between the guide 168 and the belt 112 is contemplated as extending from about 65 degrees to about 89 degrees, as indicated in
As noted above, an alternative way to define the non-orthogonal tilt angle A is to state that the retraction path line 144 is non-parallel with the associated roller axes that support the segment of belt against which the knife is drawn (see e.g., roller axes 110A, 114A in
The aforementioned edge surface 170 extends along the top of portion 168B. An inwardly facing guide surface 174 extends along portion 168A, and an outwardly facing guide surface 176 extends along portion 168C. Surfaces 170, 174 and 176 form a generally u-shaped channel, or guide slot, to accommodate the knife 160. The edge guide surface contactingly supports the cutting edge 166, and the opposing side surfaces can contactingly support the opposing sides of the blade 164. The relative elevation and orientation of the surfaces 170, 174 and 176 are selected with respect to the central axis 138 of the belt 112 (see
However, as further shown by the top plan view of
Further amounts of non-orthogonality can be supplied by combining the arrangement of
While the tilt belt arrangement of
A suitable low wear material may be used for stationary support members such as 190. Any number of contact shapes can be used (e.g., circular, oval, rectangular, etc). It is contemplated that the support member 190 and base 192 may be incorporated as a portion of the guide assembly used to support the cutting tool (see e.g., guide 168 in
As further illustrated in
As the belt serpentines over the pin and adjacent the tool, a greater surface pressure and a higher MTO rate are applied closer to the handle (front edge of the belt or to the right of centerline 196 in
The relative presentation angle of the tool (see e.g., line 144 in
As shown by
For example, in an alternative embodiment, each support member 200 has a tapered (e.g., frusto-conical) shape so that the support varies in a direction toward the rear edge of the belt. Other shapes can be used such as crowned rollers, etc. While the support rollers 200 extend across the full width of the belt 112, this is merely exemplary and is not limiting. In other embodiments, the support rollers 200 may extend less than a full width across the belt.
The roller axes 200A of the support rollers 200 are skewed inwardly from the front edge to the rear edge of the belt so as to be non-parallel with the roller axes 110A, 114A and 120A of the belt rollers 110, 114 and 120. The amount of skew of the support roller axes 200A can vary, but may be on the order of from about 5-15 degrees with respect to the belt roller axes 110A, 114A and 120A. This induces a localized increase in the surface pressure of the belt 112 upon each roller 200 toward the front edge, as depicted by force vectors 204 in
The force vectors 204 in
More specifically, this serpentine path 206 is caused by passage of the belt 112 over the skewed support roller 200, which induces a small amount of twist in the belt, with less belt deflection adjacent the front edge of the belt and greater belt deflection adjacent the rear edge of the belt. The belt continues to pass upwardly until the belt encounters the inward side of the knife blade 202. The belt contactingly engages this inward side to perform a sharpening operation upon a cutting edge of the blade. The blade then continues to pass upwardly to upper roller 114A (see
As the belt 112 engages the side of the knife blade 202, the belt induces a variable surface pressure as generally represented by force vectors 208 in
While the serpentine path 206 in
The sharpener 300 is a powered combination sharpener configured to rest on a horizontal base surface 301 during operation. As explained below, the sharpener 300 includes an endless abrasive belt that is driven along three rollers in a manner as discussed above in
An internal motor rotates the belt along the belt path. The motor may be mounted at the same tilt angle so that an output drive shaft of the motor is parallel to the roller axes and non-parallel to the horizontal direction. Alternatively, an internal linkage system can be used to link a horizontally disposed motor drive shaft to the non-horizontal roller axes. The sharpener further utilizes stationary guide slots with edge guide surfaces that are arranged in a horizontal fashion, as generally depicted in
Referring now specifically to
An endless abrasive belt 306 is partially enclosed by the housing 302. Linear extents 308, 310 of the belt are exposed adjacent corresponding guide slots 312, 314 (best viewed in
To sharpen a cutting tool such as a kitchen knife, the user activates the sharpener 300 using the switch 304. While facing the front side of the sharpener (e.g.,
The foregoing process may be repeated a suitable number of times, such as 3-5 times. This applies a primary sharpening operation to one side of the knife. The user then places the knife in the other slot (e.g., slot 314) and repeats. This completes the primary sharpening operation to the other side of the knife, producing a sharpened cutting edge. The tilt angle configuration of the sharpener will provide enhanced surface pressure and MTO control, and tip rounding will be avoided.
Continuing with
In some cases, the user may elect to perform a secondary sharpening operation upon the knife using the abrasive rod. This is carried out by placing the side of the blade against a selected one of the guide surfaces (such as the surface 324) to establish a desired orientation angle of the blade with respect to the rod 322. Once oriented, the user advances the blade along the rod while retracting the cutting edge thereacross, maintaining the angular orientation established by the guide surface. This can be repeated a number of times, such as 3-5 times, after which the process may be repeated using the other guide surface (e.g., surface 326). This applies a secondary honing operation to further sharpen the knife. In this way, the sharpening applied against the rod 322 is similar to sharpening applied using a steel-type sharpener.
In some cases, the primary sharpening angle applied to the blade by the belt 306 may be a first value, such as nominally 20 degrees, and the secondary sharpening angle applied to the blade by the rod 322 may be a second value, such as nominally 25 degrees. This allows the blade to be configured with a micro-beveled geometry to enhance sharpness and durability. Touch up sharpening may be applied using just the ceramic rod 322 as desired. Sharpening may be applied by the belt without the use of the ceramic rod.
As with the sharpener 300, the sharpener 400 is a powered sharpener configured to rest on a horizontal base surface 401 during operation. Generally, an endless abrasive belt is driven along a triangular belt path over three internally disposed rollers that are parallel with each other and are each tilted forward at a selected non-orthogonal angle with respect to the horizontal direction. An internal motor rotates the belt along the belt path, and includes an output drive shaft that is parallel to the roller axes and non-parallel to the horizontal direction. Guide slots are arranged with stationary, horizontal edge guide surfaces to provide non-orthogonal angles with respect to the belt roller axes.
With reference now to
An endless abrasive belt 406 is routed along a plurality of rollers, including rollers 408, 410. Opposing guide slots 412, 414 operate as before to enable a user to carry out modified slack-belt sharpening on opposing distal extents of the belt. An interior motor drive shaft 416 transfers rotational power to the drive roller 410 via a drive belt 418.
It will now be appreciated that the various embodiments presented herein can provide a number of benefits over the prior art. By providing a non-orthogonal alignment angle such as but not limited to those shown in
In some embodiments, different belts having different abrasiveness levels and linear stiffness levels can be successively applied to the tool to provide a more complex sharpening process. For example and not by limitation, in one embodiment a first relatively stiffer, higher abrasive belt can be installed to provide a relatively coarse level of sharpening to the knife in which relatively more material is removed therefrom, followed by installation of a second, relatively less stiff belt with a more fine level of abrasive can be installed to provide a honing operation. The differences in stiffness can provide different levels of contour to the final blade geometry.
It is to be understood that even though numerous characteristics and advantages of various embodiments of the present disclosure have been set forth in the foregoing description, together with details of the structure and function of various embodiments, this detailed description is illustrative only, and changes may be made in detail, especially in matters of structure and arrangements of parts within the principles of the present disclosure to the full extent indicated by the broad general meaning of the terms in which the appended claims are expressed.
The present application makes a claim of domestic priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/294,351 filed Feb. 12, 2016, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2124593 | Schaefer | Jul 1938 | A |
2222361 | Burns | Nov 1940 | A |
2249218 | Meade et al. | Jul 1941 | A |
2341068 | Zummach | Feb 1944 | A |
4964241 | Conklin | Oct 1990 | A |
5957758 | Shrum | Sep 1999 | A |
6648737 | Deware | Nov 2003 | B2 |
8696407 | Dovel | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8784162 | Dovel | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8944894 | Smith et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
20040198198 | Friel, Sr. et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20080261494 | Friel et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20110201257 | Walker | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20140057537 | Menegon | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20150343591 | Dovel | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62294351 | Feb 2016 | US |