Tilted antenna logging systems and methods yielding robust measurement signals

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10358911
  • Patent Number
    10,358,911
  • Date Filed
    Monday, June 25, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 23, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
Disclosed herein are electromagnetic logging systems and methods that provide a set of signals that robustly approximate the response of a model tool employing orthogonal triads of point-dipole antennas. One illustrative method embodiment obtains an azimuthally sensitive electromagnetic logging tool's signal measurements as a function of position in a borehole, the tool having at least two spacing distances (d1, d2) between transmit and receive antennas. Orthogonal direct coupling measurements (Vxx, Vyy, Vzz) are derived from the signal measurements and converted into a set of robust signals, the set including: a ratio between Vzz coupling components at different spacing distances, a ratio between Vxx and Vzz coupling components, a ratio between Vyy and Vzz coupling components, and a ratio between Vxx and Vyy coupling components. The set may include an additional robust signal having a ratio between a sum of cross-coupling components Vxz+Vzx or Vyz+Vzy and a sum of orthogonal direct coupling components.
Description
BACKGROUND

The basic principles and techniques for electromagnetic logging for earth formations are well known. For example, induction logging to determine the resistivity (or its inverse, conductivity) of earth formations adjacent a borehole has long been a standard and important technique in the search for and recovery of subterranean petroleum deposits. In brief, a transmitter transmits an electromagnetic signal that passes through formation materials around the borehole and induces a signal in ore or more receivers. The amplitude and/or phase of the receiver signals are influenced by the formation resistivity, enabling resistivity measurements to be made. The measured signal characteristics and/or formation properties calculated therefrom are recorded as a function of the tool's depth or position in the borehole, yielding a formation log that can be used by analysts.


Note, however, that the resistivity of a given formation may be isotropic (equal in all directions) or anisotropic (unequal in different directions). In electrically anisotropic formations, the anisotropy is generally attributable to fine layering during the sedimentary build-up of the formation. Hence, in a formation coordinate system oriented such that the x-y plane is parallel to the formation layers and the z axis is perpendicular to the formation layers, resistivities RX and RY in directions x and y, respectively, tend to be the same, but resistivity RZ in the z direction is different. Thus, the resistivity in a direction parallel to the plane of the formation (i.e., the x-y plane) is often known as the horizontal resistivity, RH, and the resistivity in the direction perpendicular to the plane of the formation (i.e., the z direction) is often known as the vertical resistivity, RV. The index of anisotropy, η, is defined as η=[RV/RH]1/2.


As a further complication to measuring formation resistivity, boreholes are generally not perpendicular to formation beds. The angle between the axis of the well bore and the orientation of the formation beds (as represented by a vector normal to the formation bed) has two components. These components are the dip angle and the strike angle. The dip angle is the angle between the borehole axis and the normal vector for the formation bed. The strike angle is the direction in which the boreholes axis “leans away from” the normal vector. (These will be defined more rigorously in the detailed description.)


Electromagnetic resistivity logging measurements are a complex function of formation resistivity, formation anisotropy, and the formation dip and strike angles, which may all be unknown. Moreover, engineers often rely on simplified models to interpret the measurements in a suitably prompt manner. Logging tools that fail to account for each of the unknown parameters and differences between the model and the operation of the “real world” tool may provide measurement quality that is less than ideal. Conversely, tools that account for each of these factors will provide improved resistivity measurements. Moreover, tools that are able to provide dip and strike measurements along with azimuthal orientation information, can be used for geosteering.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Accordingly, there are disclosed herein tilted antenna logging systems and methods yielding robust measurements signals. In the drawings:



FIG. 1 shows an illustrative logging while drilling environment.



FIG. 2 shows an illustrative wireline logging environment.



FIG. 3 shows a relationship between coordinate axes of a borehole and a dipping formation bed.



FIG. 4 shows an orthogonal triad antenna arrangement for an electromagnetic logging tool.



FIG. 5A shows angles for defining the orientation of a tilted antenna.



FIG. 5B shows azimuthal bins around a borehole circumference.



FIG. 6 is a block diagram of an illustrative electronics module for an electromagnetic logging tool.



FIG. 7 shows an illustrative electromagnetic logging tool having tilted transmit and receive antennas.



FIGS. 8A-8D show alternative antenna configurations for an electromagnetic logging tool.



FIGS. 9A-9D compare the phase and amplitude of uncalibrated and calibrated signal coupling components.



FIGS. 10A-10B show the phase and amplitude of an illustrative robust signal.



FIGS. 11A-11B show the phase and amplitude of illustrative instrumentation drift for the robust signal.



FIGS. 12A-12J show the illustrative phase and amplitude response of a robust signal set.



FIGS. 13A-13E show illustrative phase logs for the robust signal set.



FIG. 14 is a flowchart of an illustrative electromagnetic logging method.





It should be understood, however, that the specific embodiments given in the drawings and detailed description below do not limit the disclosure. On the contrary, they provide the foundation for one of ordinary skill to discern the alternative forms, equivalents, and other modifications that are encompassed in the scope of the appended claims.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The disclosed tool configurations and operations are best understood in the context of the larger systems in which they operate. Accordingly, an illustrative logging while drilling (LWD) environment is shown in FIG. 1. A drilling platform 2 supports a derrick 4 having a traveling block 6 for raising and lowering a drill string 8. A kelly 10 supports the drill string 8 as it is lowered through a rotary table 12. A drill bit 14 is driven by a downhole motor and/or rotation of the drill string 8. As bit 14 rotates, it creates a borehole 16 that passes through various formations 18. A pump 20 circulates drilling fluid through a feed pipe 22 to kelly 10, downhole through the interior of drill string 8, through orifices in drill bit 14, back to the surface via the annulus around drill string 8, and into a retention pit 24. The drilling fluid transports cuttings from the borehole into the pit 24 and aids in maintaining the borehole integrity.


An electromagnetic resistivity logging tool 26 is integrated into the bottom-hole assembly near the bit 14. As the bit extends the borehole through the formations, logging tool 26 collects measurements relating to various formation properties as well as the tool orientation and position and various other drilling conditions. The logging tool 26 may take the form of a drill collar, i.e., a thick-walled tubular that provides weight and rigidity to aid the drilling process. A telemetry sub 28 may be included to transfer tool measurements to a surface receiver 30 and to receive commands from the surface receiver.


The tool orientation measurements may be performed using an azimuthal orientation indicator, which may include magnetometers, inclinometers, and/or accelerometers, though other sensor types such as gyroscopes can be used. Most preferably, the orientation measurements are collected using both a 3-axis fluxgate magnetometer and a 3-axis accelerometer. As is known in the art, the combination of those two sensor systems enables the measurement of the toolface, borehole inclination, and compass direction of the borehole. The toolface and hole inclination angles are calculated from the accelerometer sensor output. The magnetometer sensor outputs are used to calculate the compass direction. With the toolface, the hole inclination, and the compass information, a tool in accordance with the present disclosure can be used to steer the bit to the desirable bed.


At various times during the drilling process, the drill string 8 may be removed from the borehole as shown in FIG. 2. Once the drill string has been removed, logging operations can be conducted using a wireline logging tool 34, i.e., a sensing instrument sonde suspended by a cable 42 having conductors for transporting power to the tool and transporting telemetry from the tool to the surface. The illustrated sonde includes a resistivity logging tool 34 having centralizing arms 36 that center the tool within the borehole as the tool is pulled uphole. A logging facility 44 collects measurements from the logging tool 34, and includes computing facilities for processing and storing the measurements gathered by the logging tool.



FIG. 1 shows that the formations 18 are not perpendicular to the borehole, which may occur naturally or may be due to directional drilling operations. The borehole has a coordinate system 50 defined in accordance with the borehole's long axis (the z axis) and the north side (or alternatively, the high side) of the hole (the x-axis). The formations 18, when characterized as a plane, have a coordinate system 51 defined in accordance with the normal to the plane (the z″ axis) and the direction of steepest descent (the x″-axis). As shown in FIG. 3, the two coordinate systems are related by two rotations. Beginning with the borehole's coordinate system (x,y,z), a first rotation of angle γ is made about the z axis. The resulting coordinate system is denoted (x′,y′,z′). Angle γ is the relative strike angle, which indicates the direction of the formation dip relative to the borehole's coordinate system. A second rotation of angle α is then made about the y′ axis. This aligns the borehole coordinate system with the formation coordinate system. Angle α is the relative dip angle, which is the slope angle of the beds relative to the long axis of the borehole.


The vertical resistivity is generally defined to be the resistivity as measured perpendicular to the plane of the formation, and the horizontal resistivity is the resistivity as measured within the plane of the formation. Determination of each of these parameters (dip angle, strike angle, vertical resistivity, and horizontal resistivity) is desirable.



FIG. 4 shows a hypothetical antenna configuration for a multi-component electromagnetic resistivity logging tool. (The electromagnetic resistivity logging tool may be embodied as a wireline tool and as a logging while drilling tool.) A triad of transmitter coils TX, TY and TZ, each oriented along a respective axis, is provided. At least one triad of similarly oriented receiver coils RX, RY, and RZ is also provided at some distance from the transmitter triad. Moran and Gianzero, in “Effects of Formation Anisotropy on Resistivity Logging Measurements” Geophysics, Vol. 44, No. 7, p. 1266 (1979), noted that the magnetic field h in the receiver coils can be represented in terms of the magnetic moments m at the transmitters and a coupling matrix C:

h=mC  (1)

In express form, equation (1) is:









[





H
x




H
y






H
z

]

=




[






M
x




M
y





M
z

]






[




C
xx




C
xy




C
xz






C
yx




C
yy




C
zz






C
zx




C
zy




C
zz




]


,






(
2
)








where MX, MY, and MZ are the magnetic moments (proportional to transmit signal strength) created by transmitters TX, TY, and TZ, respectively, HX, HY, HZ are the magnetic fields (proportional to receive signal strength) at the receiver antennas RX, RY, and RZ, respectively.


In the antenna configuration of FIG. 4, if each transmitter is fired in turn, and signal measurements are made at each receiver in response to each firing, nine signal measurements are obtained. These nine measurements enable the determination of a complete coupling matrix C. (CIJ=aIJ VIJ, where I is the index for transmitter TX, TY, or TZ, J is the index for receiver RX, RY, or RZ, aIJ, is a constant determined by the tool design, and VIJ is a complex value representing the signal amplitude and phase shift measured by receiver J in response to the firing of transmitter I.) Knowledge of the complete coupling matrix enables the determination of dip angle, strike angle, vertical resistivity, and horizontal resistivity. A number of techniques may be used to determine these parameters. For example, dip and strike angle may be determined from coupling matrix values as explained by Li Gao and Stanley Gianzero, U.S. Pat. No. 6,727,706 “Virtual Steering of Induction Tool for Determination of Formation Dip Angle”. Given these angles, vertical and horizontal resistivity can be determined in accordance with equations provided by Michael Bittar. U.S. Pat. No. 7,019,528 “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Tool Having a Tilted Antenna for Geosteering within a Desired Payzone”. Alternatively, a simultaneous solution for these parameters may be found as described in the Bittar reference.



FIG. 5A shows two angles that may be used to specify the orientation of a tilted coil antenna. The tilted coil antenna may be considered as residing in a plane having a normal vector. Tilt angle θ is the angle between the longitudinal axis of the tool and the normal vector. Azimuth angle β is the angle between the projection of the normal vector in the X-Y plane and the tool scribe line. Alternatively, in the downhole context, azimuthal angle β may represent the angle between projection of the normal vector in the X-Y plane and the x-axis of the borehole coordinate system. FIG. 5B shows a division of the borehole circumference into n bins, each bin corresponding to a range of azimuthal angle values. A representative (e.g., average) azimuthal angle is associated with each bin. Tilted antenna measurements may be associated with the bin containing the azimuthal angle for that antenna, the angle (and corresponding bin) changing as the tool rotates.


It is noted that three transmitter antenna orientations and three receiver antenna orientations are employed in the antenna configuration of FIG. 4. It has been discovered that when tool rotation is exploited, it is possible to determine the full coupling matrix with only one transmitter and two receiver antenna orientations (or equivalently, one receiver and two transmitter antenna orientations). Of course, more transmitter and/or receiver antennas can be employed and may be helpful for producing more robust measurements as described below.


Before considering various tools having specific antenna configurations, the electronics common to each tool are described. FIG. 6 shows a functional block diagram of the electronics for a resistivity tool. The electronics include a control module 602 that is coupled to an analog switch 604. Analog switch 604 is configured to drive any one of the transmitter coils T1, T2, T3, T4 with an alternating current (AC) signal from a signal source 606. In at least some embodiments, the signal source provides radio frequency signals. The control module 602 preferably selects a transmitter coil, pauses long enough for transients to die out, then signals data storage/transmit module 610 to accept an amplitude and phase sample of the signals measured by each of the receiver coils. The control module 602 preferably repeats this process sequentially for each of the transmitters. The amplitude and phase shift values are provided by amplitude and phase shift detector 608 which is coupled to each of the receiver coils R1-R4 for this purpose.


Control module 602 may process the amplitude and phase shift measurements to obtain compensated measurements and/or measurement averages. In addition to being stored in memory downhole, the raw, compensated, or averaged measurements may be transmitted to the surface for processing to determine coupling matrix elements, dip and strike angles, vertical and horizontal resistivity, and other information such as (i) distance to nearest bed boundary, (ii) direction of nearest bed boundary, and (iii) resistivity of any nearby adjacent beds. Alternatively, all or some of this processing can be performed downhole and the results may be communicated to the surface. The data storage/transmitter module 610 may be coupled to telemetry unit 28 (FIG. 1) to transmit signal measurements or processing results to the surface. Telemetry unit 28 can use any of several known techniques for transmitting information to the surface, including but not limited to (1) mud pressure pulse; (2) hard-wire connection; (3) acoustic wave; and (4) electromagnetic waves.



FIG. 7 shows an electromagnetic resistivity logging tool 702 having only two receiver antenna orientations. The tool 702 is provided with one or more regions 706 of reduced diameter. A wire coil 704 is placed in the region 706 and in some embodiments is spaced away from the surface of subassembly 702 by a constant distance. To mechanically support and protect the coil 704, a non-conductive filler material (not shown) such as epoxy, rubber, or ceramic may be used in the reduced diameter regions 706. Coil 704 is a transmitter coil, and coils 710 and 712 are receiving coils, though these roles can be reversed in view of the principle of reciprocity. In operation, transmitter coil 704 transmits an interrogating electromagnetic signal which propagates through the borehole and surrounding formation. Receiver coils 710, 712 detect the interrogating electromagnetic signal and provide a measure of the electromagnetic signal's amplitude attenuation and phase shift. For differential measurements additional receiver coils parallel to coils 710, 712 may be provided at an axially-spaced distance (see, e.g., FIGS. 8A-8D). From the absolute or differential amplitude attenuation and phase shift measurements, the coupling matrix components can be determined and used as the basis for determining formation parameters and as the basis for geosteering.


In some embodiments, the transmitter coil 704 is spaced approximately 30 inches from the receiver coils 710, 712. The additional receiver coils could be positioned approximately 8 inches further from the transmitter coil. The transmitter and receiver coils may comprise as little as one loop of wire, although more loops may provide additional signal power. The distance between the coils and the tool surface is preferably in the range from 1/16 inch to ¾ inch, but may be larger. Transmitter coil 704 and receiver coil 712 may each have a tilt angle of about 45° and aligned with the same azimuth angle, while receiver coil 710 may have a tilt angle of about 45° and an azimuth 180° apart from receiver coil 712 (or equivalently, a tilt angle of minus 450 at the same azimuth angle as receiver coil 712).


The signal measured by a tilted receiver in response to the firing of a tilted transmitter can be expressed in terms of the signals Vu that would be measured by the tool of FIG. 4. When both transmitter and receiver coils are oriented at the same azimuth angle β, the tilted receiver signal VR is











V
R



(
β
)


=




[




sin






θ
T


cos





β






sin






θ
T


sin





β






cos






θ
T





]

T



[




V
xx




V
yx




V
zx






V
xy




V
yy




V
yz






V
xz




V
yz




V
zz




]




[




sin






θ
R


cos





β






sin






θ
R


sin





β






cos






θ
R





]






(
3
)








where θT is the tilt angle of the transmitter and θR is the tilt angle of the receiver. In written-out form, the received signal is:











V
R



(
β
)


=







(



C
xx

2

-


C
yy

2


)


cos





2

β

+


(



C
yx

+

C
xy


2

)


sin





2

β




+

[







(


C
zx

+

C
xz


)


cos





β

+


(


C
zy

+

C
yz


)


sin





β


]

+

(


C
zz

+


C
xx

2

+


C
yy

2


)


=



V
double



(
β
)


+


V
single



(
β
)


+

V
const







(
4
)








meaning that









{






V
double



(
β
)


=



(



C
xx

2

-


C
yy

2


)


cos





2

β

+


(



C
yx

+

C
xy


2

)


sin





2

β










V
single



(
β
)


=



(


C
zx

+

C
xz


)


cos





β

+


(


C
zy

+

C
yz


)


sin





β









V
const

=


C
zz

+


C
xx

2

+


C
yy

2










(
5
)










where











{






C
xx

=


V
xx


sin






θ
t


sin






θ
r



;






C
yx

=


V
yx


sin






θ
t


sin






θ
r



;





C
zx

=


V
zx


cos






θ
t


sin






θ
r










C
xy

=


V
xy


sin






θ
t


sin






θ
r



;






C
yy

=


V
yy


sin






θ
t


sin






θ
r



;





C
zy

=


V
zy


cos






θ
t


sin






θ
r










C
xz

=


V
xz


sin






θ
t


cos






θ
r



;






C
yz

=


V
yz


sin






θ
t


cos






θ
r



;





C
zz

=


V
zz


cos






θ
t


cos






θ
r










(
6
)







Sinusoidal curve fitting may be applied to the received signal to extract the (summed) coefficients in equation (5). The measurements of a second tilted receiver's response to the tilted transmitter provides an additional set of measurements that enables the individual CIJ (or equivalently, the V1) values to be obtained. (Note that in most cases Vxy may be assumed equal to Vyx, but the same is not true for the other cross components.) As an example, take θ1r2c and θr1=−θr2, with the receivers R1 and R2 collocated at a distance d1 from the transmitter. The zz coupling component with can be written as











V
zz



(

d
1

)


=



V

r





1


_

const



+

V

r





2


_

const





2


cos
2



θ
c







(
7
)








where Vr1_const is the constant complex voltage Vconst from equation (4) associated with receiver R1, and VR2_const is the corresponding value for receiver R2. Along similar lines, the xx and yy components can be written











V
xx



(

d
1

)


=



(


V

r





1


_

const



-

V

r





2


_

const




)

+

(


V

r





1


_

doubl

e



_

cos



-

V

r





2


_

doubl

e



_

cos




)



2


sin
2



θ
c







(

7

b

)








V
yy



(

d
1

)


=



(


V

r





1


_

const



-

V

r





2


_

const




)

-

(


V

r





1


_

doubl

e



_

cos



-

V

r





2


_

double



_

cos




)



2


sin
2



θ
c







(

7

c

)







The cross components can be written:











V
xy



(

d
1

)


=



V
yx



(

d
1

)


=



V

r





1


_

double



_

sin



-

V

r





2


_

double



_

sin





2


sin
2



θ
c








(

8

a

)








V
yz



(

d
1

)


=



V

r





1


_

singl

e



_

sin



+

V

r





2


_

single



_

sin





2

cos






θ
c


sin






θ
c







(

8

b

)








V
zy



(

d
1

)


=



V

r





1


_

single



_

sin



-

V

r





2


_

single



_

sin





2

cos






θ
c


sin






θ
c







(

8

c

)








V
xz



(

d
1

)


=



V

r





1


_

single



_

cos



+

V

r





2


_

single



_

cos





2

cos






θ
c


sin






θ
c







(

8

d

)








V
zx



(

d
1

)


=



V

r





1


_

single



_

cos



-

V

r





2


_

single



_

cos





2

cos






θ
c


sin






θ
c







(

8

e

)







Other techniques for deriving the coupling components from the received signal measurements are known and may be used. See, e.g., WO 2008/076130 “Antenna coupling component measurement tool having a rotating antenna configuration” and WO 2011/129828 “Processing and Geosteering with a Rotating Tool”.


To provide more robust measurements, additional transmitters and/or receivers may be included on the tool as indicated in FIGS. 8A-8D. FIG. 8A shows a tool having a first set of oppositely tilted receiver antennas (Rup1, Rup2, with respective skew angles −θc and +θc) at a distance d1 from a tilted transmitter antenna (Tup1 with skew angle +θc) and a second set of oppositely tilted receiver antennas (Rdn1, Rdn2 at −θc and +θc) at a distance d2 from tilted transmitter antenna Tup1. The additional set of receiver antennas enables cancellation of the mandrel effect as explained further below. The illustrated tool further includes a second tilted transmitter antenna (Tdn1 at +θc) positioned at distance d1 from the second set of receiver antennas and distance d2 from the first set of receiver antennas. The additional transmitter antenna enables compensation of temperature effects in the receiver electronics as explained further below.



FIG. 8B shows an alternative antenna configuration in which the additional transmitter antenna is skewed in an opposite direction from the first transmitter antenna. FIG. 5C shows an antenna configuration with two sets of oppositely-tilted transmitter antennas (±θc) and a single tilted receiver antenna at distance d1 and a single receiver antenna at distance d2, the two receiver antennas being parallel (+θc). FIG. 8D is similar, but has the two receiver antennas skewed in opposite directions. Yet another antenna configuration would include two sets of oppositely-tilted transmitter antennas together with two sets of oppositely-tilted receiver antennas. It is further noted that the receiver antennas are shown as being positioned between the transmitter antennas, but this is not a requirement, as some tool embodiments may have the transmitter antennas positioned between the receiver antennas.


Given the illustrative antenna configurations, the tool measurements may be combined as outlined below to provide more robust values, i.e., measurements that are insensitive to environmental effects (e.g., temperature, pressure, and eccentricity) and that compensate for tool non-idealities such as the presence of a conductive tool mandrel when the models assume point dipoles. As one step in this direction, the tool may acquire measurements with a second set of receivers at a distance d2 from the transmitter (see, e.g., FIG. 8A). The ratio (hereafter termed “Signal 1” or S1):

S1=Vzz(d1)/Vzz(d2)  (9)

has been found to significantly reduce sensitivity to the mandrel effect, and it serves as a good indication of formation resistivity. Signal 1 can be calibrated by means of an air-hang measurement in which the tool is suspended sufficiently far from any conductive or partially conductive materials (e.g., 20 feet in the air) and the received signal responses noted. Representing the air-hang measurements with an “air” superscript, the calibrated signal is:










S
1
cal

=





V
zz



(

d
1

)




V
zz



(

d
2

)





/





V
zz
air



(

d
1

)




V
zz
air



(

d
2

)




=




V
zz



(

d
1

)




V
zz
air



(

d
1

)





/





V
zz



(

d
2

)




V
zz
air



(

d
2

)









(
10
)








The second expression above simply indicates that the calibration can be equivalently performed on a component by component basis.


Taking as an example the antenna configuration of FIG. 8A with a mandrel diameter of 4.0″, an antenna coil diameter of 4.5″(as measured by projecting the coil onto the x-y plane), a first transmit-receive antenna spacing of d1=28″ and a second transmit-receive antenna spacing of d2=36″, and an operating signal frequency of 500 kHz, a simulation was performed to illustrate the effects of the mandrel on the measured signals given by equations (9) and (10). As the signals are complex-valued, they are graphed in FIG. 9 in terms of their amplitude and phase angle.



FIGS. 9A and 9B show the phase angle and amplitude of Signal 1 (equation 9) as a function of formation resistivity and skew angle. For comparison, the expected signal derived from a point-dipole model is also shown. FIGS. 9C and 9D show the phase angle and amplitude of the calibrated Signal 1 (equation 10) as a function of formation resistivity and skew angle. The phase angle curves overlap so well as to be indistinguishable. FIG. 9B, however, indicates a significant mandrel effect when tools having low antenna skew angles measure formations with higher resistivities. The calibrated signals, however, adequately correct for this effect and bring the curves largely into alignment with the point dipole model. As the slope of the signal curve flattens out for high resistivities, the formation resistivity calculation may be sensitive to small errors in this region.


To improve resistance to temperature effects, compensated measurements can be used. Such compensation techniques are known (at least with respect to tools using coaxial antennas), and they combine the measurements extracted from the receivers' responses to the first antenna with the receivers' responses to the second antenna. For example, denoting the calibrated signal measurement derived from transmitter Tup1 (FIG. 8B) as S1cal (Tup1) and the calibrated signal measurement derived from Tdn1 as S1cal (Tdn1), the compensated signal measurement can be expressed as

S1comp=√{square root over (S1cal(Tup1)−S1cal(Tdn1))}  (11)

An alternative compensation approach is to simply average the two calibrated measurements. Depending on the antenna configuration it may be desirable to precede this compensation calculation with depth shifting and/or azimuth reversal of the calibrated signal measurements to ensure that the measurements collected using the different antennas are all associated with the same region of the formation. The additional measurements can also improve signal to noise ratio.


Returning to a single-transmitter analysis, we now consider additional tool signals. As with Signal 1, it is helpful to normalize the other coupling components. Unfortunately, the distance effect on the xx coupling component measurements is different than the effect on the zz coupling component measurements, making a different approach desirable. The ratio thereafter termed “Signal 2” or “S2”):

S2(d)=Vxx(d)/Vzz(d)  (12)

has been found to compensate for the mandrel effect and produce a better approximation of a point-dipole tool response. It can be calibrated and compensated in a similar fashion as Signal 1. The responses of the second set of receivers can also be taken into account with a geometrical average, yielding a combined S2:

S2combined=√{square root over (S2(d1S2(d2))}  (13)

which can also be calibrated and compensated as described previously. FIGS. 10A and 10B show the phase and amplitude of the combined, uncalibrated, uncompensated S2 as a function of resistivity and skew angle. (Because of the denominator in equation 7b, a zero skew angle is not included.) A point-dipole tool model response is also shown. For resistivities above about 0.2 Ωm, the match to the point-dipole model is quite good. A similar response is expected for Signal 3, which is defined:

S3(d)=Vyy(d)/Vzz(d)  (14)
with
S3combined=√{square root over (S3(d1S3(d2))}  (15)


In a similar vein, a fourth signal may be defined:

S4(d)=Vxx(d)/Vyy(d)  (16)
with
S4combined=√{square root over (S4(d1S4(d2))}  (17)

It is expected that an approximate skew angle of 45° would offer the best noise immunity as it provides antenna responses with roughly equal signal responses from the xx and zz components. We note that signal S4 can be defined using the inverse ratio with equally effective results.



FIG. 11 illustrates the results of a cool-down test, in which a logging tool is heated to 300° C. before being suspended in the air and allowed to cool to ambient temperature. FIGS. 11A and 11B show the phase and amplitude of the calibrated (but not combined or compensated) S2 signal as a function of temperature. The signal variation is approximately ±0.1° of phase and ±2% of amplitude. With compensated measurements, this variation is essentially eliminated.


Though the foregoing four signals have each been defined in terms of a ratio between two components, the definition of robust signals need not be so limited. A fifth contemplated signal is defined as:











S
5



(
d
)


=




V
xz



(
d
)


+


V
zx



(
d
)


+


V
const



(
d
)





V
const



(
d
)







(
18
)








The fifth signal offers an enhanced sensitivity to relative dip angle. As with the other signals, combined, calibrated, and compensated versions of the fifth signal can be determined. With this set of robust measurement signals, one can expect to compute very reliable inversion results.


The ratio, calibration, and compensation techniques that have been applied to the extracted coupling components can also be applied to the receiver signals. Thus, for example, an calibrated azimuthal resistivity signal can be expressed











V
Res
Calibrated



(
β
)


=





V

Rdn





1




(
β
)


-


V

Rdn





2




(
β
)






V

Rup





1




(
β
)


-


V

Rup





2




(
β
)







V

Rdn





1


_

const


air

-

V

Rdn





2


_

const


air




V

Rup





1


_

const



-

V

Rup





2


_

const


air








(
19
)








or a geosteering signal based on operation of a first transmitter Tup1 can be expressed











V
Geo

T

up





1





(

β
,

d
1


)


=




V

R

up





2





(

β
,

d
1


)


+


V

R

up





1





(

β
,

d
1


)






V

R

up





2





(

β
,

d
1


)


-


V

R

up





1





(

β
,

d
1


)








(
20
)








and a combined geosteering signal can be expressed:

VGeoTup1−comb(β)=VGeoTup1(β,d1VGeoTup1(β,d2)  (21)


Eq. (17) to Eq. (19) illustrate general compensation methods that apply to azimuthal measurements of MWD/LWD tools with tilted antenna systems. These signal, can be used to determine formation parameters, such as formation resistivity, formation anisotropy, formation relative dip angle, etc. In addition, due to the cancellation of mandrel and temperature effects, these signals can be also used for look-ahead tools.


It is noted that signals S1-S5 are calculated from the coupling components, and can be determined from these components regardless of how the coupling components were derived from the tool measurements. Among other things, this observation indicates that the principles disclosed herein can be applied to the measurements of any antenna configuration sufficient to determine the coupling components (including that of FIG. 4) and regardless of whether the tool is embodied in wireline or LWD form. It is further noted that while each of the combination, calibration, and compensation operations described above can contribute to improving measurement accuracy, each of these operations is optional. The order in which the chosen operations are applied is largely a matter of convenience and can be varied without significantly impacting their potential benefits. Some or all of the combination, calibration, and/or compensation operations can be performed on the extracted coupling components before or after the ratio calculations that yield signals S1-S5, and in at least some cases, they could be performed on the (azimuthally dependent) received signal measurements before the extraction of the coupling components.


We have found that signal set S1-S4 serves as an excellent set of inputs from which formation parameters such as horizontal resistivity, anisotropy, dip angle, and strike angle can be derived. Accuracy is improved with the use of additional signals such as signal S5. FIGS. 12A-12E illustrate the phases of signals S1-S5 and FIGS. 12F-12J illustrate the amplitudes of signals S1-S5 for different resistivities, anisotropies, and dip angles in a homogeneous formation. The signals' sensitivities to each of these parameters is evident from an inspection of these figures, and the calibration, combination, and compensation techniques outlined previously do not inhibit this sensitivity, as has been found to be the case for other noise reduction techniques.


Without limiting the manner in which the signal set is employed to derive the formation parameters, we note that the S1 signal closely relates to the operation of a conventional logging tool and indeed, can be converted to a conventional resistivity signal. Signal S2 and S3 can be used to determine resistive anisotropy of the formation. Signal S4 captures the divergence of the xx and yy coupling components and provides a useful sensitivity to dip angle. Signal S5 relates the cross-coupling components to the direct coupling components and serves to speed the inversion with its unique sensitivity to the formation parameters. Performing inversion on the set of signals S1-S4 or S1-S5 yields a robust estimate of formation parameters.



FIGS. 13A-13E illustrate the set of signals S1-S5 derived from a set of real-world measurements (as provided in FIG. 14) by a tool having the antenna configuration of FIG. 8B. These signal logs may be printed, displayed on a computer screen, or otherwise made tangible for a user to study and analyze. The signal logs show signal phase as a function of measured depth (i.e., position along the borehole). Inversion was performed on signals S1-S5 using a Levenberg-Marquardt technique with a OD inversion code for a point-dipole model yielded the predicted signals set indicated by the broken lines in FIG. 13. A excellent match between the derived (“raw”) signals and the predicted (“sim”) signals can be observed. The obtained parameters also match what the petrophysicists know about this well from other sources.



FIG. 14 is a flowchart of an illustrative tilted antenna logging method which may be performed by a downhole controller, by a surface computing facility that receives measurements from the tool, or performed cooperatively by both. In block 802 an initial transmitter is selected. In block 804, the selected transmitter is fired, and the amplitude and phase of each receiver's response is measured. The tool's position and orientation are also captured and used to associate the receiver response measurements with an measurement bin. (Because the borehole wall is conceptually divided into a grid, each bin has both an angular extent and an axial extent.) In block 806, the latest measurements are used to update the average response for each receiver for the given bin.


In block 808, a test is made to determine whether additional measurements are needed or will be forthcoming at the current borehole position. For example, in tools having multiple transmitters, it is desired to have measurements from each transmitter. Other reasons for needing additional measurements include having a desired number of measurements within each measurement bin before additional processing is performed, or having at least a given number of azimuthally different measurements before additional processing is performed. If additional measurements at the current position are expected, the additional processing may be postponed until all the relevant measurements have been collected. The logging process then proceeds with the selection of the next transmitter in block 809 and blocks 804-809 are repeated until sufficient measurements have been achieved for the current borehole position.


Once a sufficient number of measurements have been obtained at a given position in the borehole, the method continues with block 810, where the orthogonal antenna coupling are extracted from the azimuthally-dependent measurements collected at the current borehole position. This may be done in accordance with the equations (3)-(8) given above, or by any suitable method including a least squares solution to a linear system of equations such a, that disclosed in WO 2008/076130 “Antenna coupling component measurement tool having a rotating antenna configuration”. Certain antenna configurations (e.g., those using orthogonal triads) may yield such measurements directly.


In block 812, signals S1-S5 are derived from the orthogonal components as described above. There may be a set of such signals for each of multiple transmit-receive antenna pairings, which can be subjected to a combination operation (to combine measurements by receivers at different distances) and/or a compensation operation (to combine measurements obtained in response to different transmitters) to yield more accurate signals S1-S5 in optional block 814. An optional calibration operation may also be applied in block 814.


In block 816, an initial estimate of the formation parameters is made. This estimate can be based on default values, previous results, or randomly generated. The contemplated formation parameters include horizontal resistivity, anisotropy, dip angle, and strike, but other parameters can be employed. In block 818, a predicted set of signals S1-S5 is generated from a model based on the estimated formation parameter values. In block 820, the predicted signal set is compared to the set of signals derived in blocks 812-814. If there is not an adequate match, the estimated values are updated in block 821 in accordance with a Levenberg-Marquardt technique, a Gauss-Newton technique, or other numerical solution technique. Blocks 818-821 are repeated until the predicted set of signals converges to the derived set. Then, in optional block 822, a real-time log displaying one or more of the formation parameters as a function of position is updated with the newly determined parameter values. The log associates the calculated values with a depth or axial position within the borehole.


In block 824 a check is made to determine if logging information is available (or will become available) for additional positions within the borehole. If so, the process begins again with block 802. Otherwise, the process terminates.


Numerous variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art once the above disclosure is fully appreciated. For example, the foregoing disclosure describes numerous antenna configurations in the context of a logging while drilling tool, such antenna configurations can also be readily applied to wireline logging tools. Furthermore, the principle of reciprocity can be applied to obtain equivalent measurements while exchanging each antenna's role as a transmitter or receiver. It is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such variations and modifications.

Claims
  • 1. An electromagnetic logging method that comprises: obtaining signal measurements collected using an azimuthally sensitive electromagnetic logging tool with a titled antenna as a function of position in a borehole, the tool having at least two spacing distances (d1, d2) between transmit and receive antennas;deriving orthogonal direct coupling measurements (Vxx, Vyy, Vzz) from the signal measurements;providing a set of robust signals as a function of position in the borehole, the robust signals including: a ratio between Vzz coupling components at different spacing distances,a ratio between Vxx and Vzz coupling components,a ratio between Vyy and Vzz coupling components, anda ratio between Vxx and Vyy coupling components; andusing the set of robust signals to determine a log of one or more formation parameters.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising displaying the set of robust signals in log form to a user.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein as part of said deriving or providing, the method includes combining measurements associated with different spacing distances to obtain each of the robust signals.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein as part of said deriving or providing, the method further includes employing measurements associated with different transmit antennas to ensure that the robust signals are compensated for instrumentation drift.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein as part of said deriving or providing, the method includes using air-hang measurements for calibration of each of the robust signals.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the tool is a logging while drilling tool having one or more tilted antennas.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the tool is a wireline tool having at least one triad of orthogonal transmit antennas and at least one triad of orthogonal receive antennas.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising providing and additional robust signal having a ration between a sum of cross-coupling components Vxz+Vzx or Vyz+Vzy and a weighted or unweighted sum of orthogonal direct coupling components.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the additional robust signal is expressible as
  • 10. An electromagnetic logging system for determining resistivity of earth formations that comprises: an azimuthally sensitive electromagnetic logging tool with a titled antenna, wherein the tool has at least two spacing distances (d1, d2) between a transmit antenna and a receive antenna, wherein the tilted antenna transmits an electromagnetic signal, wherein the receive antenna is used to collect signal measurements;a memory that stores logging software; andat least one processor coupled to the memory to execute the logging software, the software causing the at least one processor to: obtain the azimuthally sensitive electromagnetic logging tool's signal measurements as a function of position in a borehole;derive orthogonal direct coupling measurements (Vxx, Vyy, Vzz) from the signal measurements;provide a set of robust signals as a function of position in the borehole, the robust signals including: a ratio between Vzz coupling components at different spacing distances,a ratio between Vxx and Vzz coupling components,a ratio between Vyy and Vzz coupling components, anda ratio between Vxx and Vyy coupling components; anduse the set of robust signals to determine a log of one or more formation parameters; andgenerate a geosteering signal from the set of robust signals to direct a drill bit.
  • 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the software further causes the at least one processor to display the set of robust signals in log form to a user.
  • 12. The system of claim 10, wherein as part of said deriving or providing, the software causes the at least one processor to combine measurements associated with different spacing distances to obtain each of the robust signals.
  • 13. The system of claim 12, wherein as part of said deriving or providing, the software further causes the at least one processor to employ measurements associated with different transmit antennas to ensure that the robust signals are compensated for instrumentation drift.
  • 14. The system of claim 10, wherein as part of said deriving or providing, the software causes the at least one processor to use air-hang measurements for calibration of each of the robust signals.
  • 15. The system of claim 10, wherein the tool is a logging while drilling tool having one or more tilted antennas.
  • 16. The system of claim 10, wherein the tool is a wireline tool having at least one triad of orthogonal transmit antennas and at least one triad of orthogonal receive antennas.
  • 17. The system of claim 10, wherein the set of robust signals includes an additional robust signal having a ratio between a sum of cross-coupling components Vxz+Vzx or Vyz+Vzy and a weighted or unweighted sum of orthogonal direct coupling components.
  • 18. The system of claim 17, wherein the additional robust signal is expressible as
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/US2012/043943 6/25/2012 WO 00 12/22/2014
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2014/003702 1/3/2014 WO A
US Referenced Citations (332)
Number Name Date Kind
2884590 Welz Apr 1959 A
2901689 Barrett Aug 1959 A
3014177 Hungerford et al. Dec 1961 A
3187252 Hungerford Jun 1965 A
3406766 Henderson Oct 1968 A
3408561 Osborn Oct 1968 A
3412815 Holser Nov 1968 A
3510757 Huston May 1970 A
3539911 Youmans et al. Nov 1970 A
3561007 Gouilloud et al. Feb 1971 A
3614600 Ronka et al. Oct 1971 A
3808520 Runge Apr 1974 A
3982176 Meador Sep 1976 A
4072200 Morris et al. Feb 1978 A
4104596 Smither Aug 1978 A
4224989 Blount Sep 1980 A
4258321 Neale Mar 1981 A
4297699 Fowler et al. Oct 1981 A
4302722 Gianzero Nov 1981 A
4319191 Meador et al. Mar 1982 A
4360777 Segesman Nov 1982 A
4430653 Coon et al. Feb 1984 A
4443762 Kuckes Apr 1984 A
4458767 Hoehn, Jr. Jul 1984 A
4472684 Schuster Sep 1984 A
4502010 Kuckes Feb 1985 A
4504833 Fowler et al. Mar 1985 A
4536714 Clark Aug 1985 A
4553097 Clark Nov 1985 A
4593770 Hoehn, Jr. Jun 1986 A
4605268 Meador Aug 1986 A
4611173 Bravenec et al. Sep 1986 A
4636731 Savage et al. Jan 1987 A
4651101 Barber et al. Mar 1987 A
4670717 Sender Jun 1987 A
4697190 Oswald Sep 1987 A
4700142 Kuckes Oct 1987 A
4780857 Lyle et al. Oct 1988 A
4785247 Meador et al. Nov 1988 A
4791373 Kuckes Dec 1988 A
4808929 Oldigs Feb 1989 A
4814768 Chang Mar 1989 A
RE32913 Clark Apr 1989 E
4825421 Jeter Apr 1989 A
4829488 Siegfried, II May 1989 A
4845433 Kleinberg Jul 1989 A
4845434 Kuckes et al. Jul 1989 A
4873488 Barber et al. Oct 1989 A
4875014 Roberts et al. Oct 1989 A
4899112 Clark et al. Feb 1990 A
4909336 Brown et al. Mar 1990 A
4933640 Kuckes Jun 1990 A
4940943 Bartel et al. Jul 1990 A
4945987 Wittrisch Aug 1990 A
4949045 Clark et al. Aug 1990 A
4962490 Lyle et al. Oct 1990 A
4968940 Clark et al. Nov 1990 A
4980643 Gianzero et al. Dec 1990 A
5089779 Rorden Feb 1992 A
5113192 Thomas May 1992 A
5115198 Gianzero et al. May 1992 A
5133418 Gibson et al. Jul 1992 A
5138313 Barrington Aug 1992 A
5155198 Keohan Oct 1992 A
5200705 Clark et al. Apr 1993 A
5210495 Hapashey et al. May 1993 A
5230386 Wu et al. Jul 1993 A
5230387 Waters et al. Jul 1993 A
5239448 Perkins et al. Aug 1993 A
5241273 Luling Aug 1993 A
5243290 Safinya Sep 1993 A
5248975 Schutz Sep 1993 A
5260662 Rorden Nov 1993 A
5278507 Bartel et al. Jan 1994 A
5318123 Venditto et al. Jun 1994 A
5329448 Rosthal Jul 1994 A
5332048 Underwood et al. Jul 1994 A
5339036 Clark et al. Aug 1994 A
5343152 Kuckes Aug 1994 A
5357253 Van Etten et al. Oct 1994 A
5358050 Schmidt Oct 1994 A
5377104 Sorrells et al. Dec 1994 A
5389881 Bittar et al. Feb 1995 A
5400030 Duren et al. Mar 1995 A
5402068 Meador et al. Mar 1995 A
5420589 Wells et al. May 1995 A
5424293 Sinclair et al. Jun 1995 A
5442294 Rorden Aug 1995 A
5485089 Kuckes Jan 1996 A
5503225 Withers Apr 1996 A
5508616 Sato et al. Apr 1996 A
5530358 Wisler et al. Jun 1996 A
5530359 Habashy et al. Jun 1996 A
5541517 Hartmann Jul 1996 A
5550473 Klein Aug 1996 A
5552786 Xia et al. Sep 1996 A
5563512 Mumby Oct 1996 A
5589775 Kuckes Dec 1996 A
5594343 Clark et al. Jan 1997 A
5631562 Cram et al. May 1997 A
5656930 Hagiwara Aug 1997 A
5676212 Kuckes Oct 1997 A
5720355 Lamine et al. Feb 1998 A
5725059 Kuckes et al. Mar 1998 A
5747750 Bailey et al. May 1998 A
5757191 Gianzero May 1998 A
5765642 Surjaatmadja Jun 1998 A
5781436 Forgang et al. Jul 1998 A
5854991 Gupta et al. Dec 1998 A
5886526 Wu Mar 1999 A
5892460 Jerabek et al. Apr 1999 A
5900833 Sunlin et al. May 1999 A
5917160 Bailey Jun 1999 A
5923170 Kuckes Jul 1999 A
5999883 Gupta et al. Dec 1999 A
6044325 Chakravarthy et al. Mar 2000 A
6084826 Leggett, III Jul 2000 A
6098727 Ringgenberg et al. Aug 2000 A
6100839 Heger et al. Aug 2000 A
6147496 Strack et al. Nov 2000 A
6158532 Logan et al. Dec 2000 A
6163155 Bittar Dec 2000 A
6181138 Hagiwara et al. Jan 2001 B1
6191586 Bittar Feb 2001 B1
6191588 Chen Feb 2001 B1
6206108 MacDonald et al. Mar 2001 B1
6216783 Hocking et al. Apr 2001 B1
6218841 Wu Apr 2001 B1
6218842 Bittar Apr 2001 B1
6257334 Cyr Jul 2001 B1
6297639 Clark et al. Oct 2001 B1
6304086 Minerbo et al. Oct 2001 B1
6351127 Rosthal et al. Feb 2002 B1
6353321 Bittar Mar 2002 B1
6359438 Bittar Mar 2002 B1
6373254 Dion et al. Apr 2002 B1
6389438 Zhou May 2002 B1
6405136 Li et al. Jun 2002 B1
6435286 Stump et al. Aug 2002 B1
6460936 Abramov et al. Oct 2002 B1
6466020 Kuckes et al. Oct 2002 B2
6476609 Bittar Nov 2002 B1
6491115 Van Houwelingen et al. Dec 2002 B2
6496137 Johansson Dec 2002 B1
6508316 Estes et al. Jan 2003 B2
6538447 Bittar Mar 2003 B2
6541979 Omeragic Apr 2003 B2
6557650 Fayard et al. May 2003 B2
6566881 Omeragic et al. May 2003 B2
6573722 Rosthal et al. Jun 2003 B2
6584837 Kurkoski Jul 2003 B2
6614229 Clark et al. Sep 2003 B1
6630831 Amini Oct 2003 B2
6633252 Stolarczyk et al. Oct 2003 B2
6646441 Thompson et al. Nov 2003 B2
6651739 Arndt et al. Nov 2003 B2
6672409 Dock et al. Jan 2004 B1
6691036 Blanch et al. Feb 2004 B2
6710600 Kopecki et al. Mar 2004 B1
6712140 Van Oers et al. Mar 2004 B2
6727706 Gao et al. Apr 2004 B2
6736222 Kuckes et al. May 2004 B2
6755263 Alft et al. Jun 2004 B2
6765385 Sinclair et al. Jul 2004 B2
6771206 Berthelier et al. Aug 2004 B2
6777940 Macune Aug 2004 B2
6778127 Stolarczyik et al. Aug 2004 B2
6788065 Homan et al. Sep 2004 B1
6810331 Bittar et al. Oct 2004 B2
6856132 Appel Feb 2005 B2
6863127 Clark et al. Mar 2005 B2
6885943 Bittar et al. Apr 2005 B2
6900640 Fanini et al. May 2005 B2
6911824 Bittar Jun 2005 B2
6925031 Kriegshauser et al. Aug 2005 B2
6934635 Kennedy Aug 2005 B2
6940446 Cist Sep 2005 B2
6943709 Blanch et al. Sep 2005 B2
6944546 Xiao et al. Sep 2005 B2
6958610 Gianzero Oct 2005 B2
6961663 Sinclair et al. Nov 2005 B2
6985814 McElhinney Jan 2006 B2
7013991 Wilson-Langman et al. Mar 2006 B2
7019528 Bittar Mar 2006 B2
7038455 Beste et al. May 2006 B2
7046009 Itskovich May 2006 B2
7046010 Hu et al. May 2006 B2
7062072 Anxionnaz et al. Jun 2006 B2
7098664 Bittar et al. Aug 2006 B2
7098858 Bittar et al. Aug 2006 B2
7123016 Larsen Oct 2006 B2
7133779 Tilke et al. Nov 2006 B2
7138803 Bittar Nov 2006 B2
7143844 Alft et al. Dec 2006 B2
7171310 Haugland Jan 2007 B2
7202670 Omeragic et al. Apr 2007 B2
7227363 Gianzero et al. Jun 2007 B2
7265552 Bittar Sep 2007 B2
7268019 Golla et al. Sep 2007 B2
7296462 Gregory et al. Nov 2007 B2
7301223 Rodney et al. Nov 2007 B2
7306056 Ballantyne et al. Dec 2007 B2
7313479 Frenkel Dec 2007 B2
7336222 Praskovsky et al. Feb 2008 B2
7345487 Bittar et al. Mar 2008 B2
7350568 Mandal et al. Apr 2008 B2
7382135 Li et al. Jun 2008 B2
7394257 Martinez et al. Jul 2008 B2
7425830 Banning et al. Sep 2008 B2
7425831 Banning et al. Sep 2008 B2
7427862 Dashevsky et al. Sep 2008 B2
7427863 Bittar Sep 2008 B2
7477162 Clark Jan 2009 B2
7503404 McDaniel et al. Mar 2009 B2
7557579 Bittar Jul 2009 B2
7557580 Bittar Jul 2009 B2
7609065 Banning et al. Oct 2009 B2
7612565 Seydoux et al. Nov 2009 B2
7657377 Sinclair et al. Feb 2010 B2
7676326 Podladchikov Mar 2010 B2
7686099 Rodney et al. Mar 2010 B2
7739049 Market et al. Jun 2010 B2
7746078 Bittar et al. Jun 2010 B2
7755361 Seydoux et al. Jul 2010 B2
7775276 Pelletier et al. Aug 2010 B2
7786733 Seydoux et al. Aug 2010 B2
7812610 Clark et al. Oct 2010 B2
7825664 Homan et al. Nov 2010 B2
7839148 Vehra et al. Nov 2010 B2
7839346 Bittar et al. Nov 2010 B2
7848887 Yang et al. Dec 2010 B2
7912648 Tang et al. Mar 2011 B2
7924013 Seydoux et al. Apr 2011 B2
7948238 Bittar May 2011 B2
7982464 Bittar et al. Jul 2011 B2
8004282 Itskovich Aug 2011 B2
8016053 Menezes et al. Sep 2011 B2
8026722 McElhinney Sep 2011 B2
8030937 Hu et al. Oct 2011 B2
8085049 Bittar et al. Dec 2011 B2
8085050 Bittar et al. Dec 2011 B2
8096355 McDaniel et al. Jan 2012 B2
8159227 Wang Apr 2012 B2
8174265 Bittar et al. May 2012 B2
8244473 Radtke Aug 2012 B2
8274289 Bittar et al. Sep 2012 B2
8347985 Bittar et al. Jan 2013 B2
8378908 Wisler et al. Feb 2013 B2
8499830 Alberty Aug 2013 B2
8749243 Bittar et al. Jun 2014 B2
8917094 Bittar et al. Dec 2014 B2
8954280 Li Feb 2015 B2
9310508 Donderici et al. Apr 2016 B2
9364905 Hou Jun 2016 B2
9547102 Wu Jan 2017 B2
9753175 Li Sep 2017 B2
9791586 Bittar Oct 2017 B2
20010022464 Seear Sep 2001 A1
20030023381 San Martin Jan 2003 A1
20030055565 Omeragic Mar 2003 A1
20030076107 Fanini et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030090424 Brune et al. May 2003 A1
20030229449 Merchant et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030229450 Strickland Dec 2003 A1
20040019427 San Martin et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040059514 Bittar et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040061622 Clark Apr 2004 A1
20040196047 Fanini et al. Aug 2004 A1
20050006090 Chemali et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050024060 Bittar Feb 2005 A1
20050211469 Kuckes et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050218898 Fredette et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060011385 Seydoux et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060015256 Hassan et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060038571 Ostermeier et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060054354 Orban Mar 2006 A1
20060102353 Storm et al. May 2006 A1
20060125479 Chemali et al. Jun 2006 A1
20070075455 Marini et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070075874 Shah et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070079989 Bankston et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070235225 Bittar Oct 2007 A1
20070278008 Kuckes et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080000686 Kuckes et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080002523 Podladchikov Jan 2008 A1
20080018895 Opsal Jan 2008 A1
20080143336 Legendre et al. Jun 2008 A1
20090037111 Radtke Feb 2009 A1
20090045973 Rodney et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090164127 Clark Jun 2009 A1
20090179647 Wang et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090229826 East, Jr. et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090278543 Beste et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090309600 Seydoux et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090315563 Fox et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100004866 Rabinovich et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012377 Sharp et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100082255 Davydycheva et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100117655 Bittar May 2010 A1
20100127708 Bittar May 2010 A1
20100262370 Bittar et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100284250 Cornish et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110006773 Bittar Jan 2011 A1
20110019501 Market Jan 2011 A1
20110175899 Bittar et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110186290 Roddy et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110187566 Soenen et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110192592 Roddy et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110199228 Roddy et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110221442 Maurer et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110221443 Bittar et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110234230 Bittar et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110251794 Bittar et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110298461 Bittar et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110308859 Bittar et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110309833 Yang Dec 2011 A1
20110309835 Barber et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120001637 Bittar et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120024600 Bittar et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120025834 Minerbo et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120133367 Bittar et al. May 2012 A1
20120199394 Bittar Aug 2012 A1
20120283951 Li Nov 2012 A1
20120283952 Tang et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130073206 Hou Mar 2013 A1
20130105224 Donderici et al. May 2013 A1
20140032116 Guner et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140191879 Bittar et al. Jul 2014 A1
20150240629 Wu Aug 2015 A1
20150355368 Li Dec 2015 A1
20150369950 Wu Dec 2015 A1
20160274263 Hou Sep 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (23)
Number Date Country
2012383577 Jun 2012 AU
2011202215 May 2013 AU
2011202518 May 2013 AU
2873718 Jan 2014 CA
2116871 Nov 2009 EP
1315984 Jan 2011 EP
1155343 Mar 2011 EP
2108981 May 2011 EP
2110687 Aug 2011 EP
2007149106 Dec 2007 WO
2008008346 Jan 2008 WO
2008008386 Jan 2008 WO
2008021868 Feb 2008 WO
2008076130 Jun 2008 WO
WO 2008076130 Jun 2008 WO
2011129828 Oct 2011 WO
WO 2011129828 Oct 2011 WO
2012005737 Jan 2012 WO
2012008965 Jan 2012 WO
2012064342 May 2012 WO
2012121697 Sep 2012 WO
WO 2014003701 Jan 2014 WO
WO 2014003702 Jan 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (29)
Entry
AU Patent Examination Report No. 1, dated Mar. 27, 2015, Appl No. 2012383577, “Tilted Antenna Logging Systems and Methods Yielding Robust Measurement Signals,” Filed Jun. 25, 2015, 3 pgs.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Sep. 20, 2012, Appl No. PCT/US2012/043943, “Tilted Antenna Logging Systems and Methods Yielding Robust Measurement Signals” filed Jun. 5, 2012, 12 pgs.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Jun. 6, 2014, Appl No. PCT/US2012/043943, “Tilted Antenna Logging Systems and Methods Yielding Robust Measurement Signals” filed Jun. 5, 2012, 6 pgs.
Moran, J. H., et al., “Effects of Formation Anisotropy of Resistivity-Logging Measurements,” Geophysics, vol. 44, No. 7, (Jul. 1979), p. 1266-1286, 21 Figs., 4 Tables.
Barriol, Yves et al., “The Pressures of Drilling and Production”, Oilfield Review, Autumn 2005, pp. 22-41.
Bell, C. et al., “Navigating and Imaging in Complex Geology With Azimuthal Propagation Resistivity While Drilling”, 2006 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE 102637, San Antonio, TX, USA, Sep. 24, 2006, pp. 1-14.
Bittar, Michael S., “A New Azimuthal Deep-Reading Resistivity Tool for Geosteering and Advanced Formation Evaluation”, 2007 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE 109971, Anaheim, CA, USA, Nov. 11, 2007, pp. 1-9.
Bittar, Michael S. et al., “A True Multiple Depth of Investigation Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Sensor: Theory, Experiment, and Prototype Field Test Results”, SPE 22705, 66th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the SPE, Dallas, TX, Oct. 6, 1991, pp. 1-8, plus 10 pgs of Figures.
Bittar, Michael S. et al., “Invasion Profiling with a Multiple Depth of Investigation, Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Sensor”, SPE 28425, 69th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the SPE, New Orleans, LA, Sep. 25, 1994, pp. 1-12, plus 11 pgs of Figures.
Bittar, Michael S. et al., “The Effects of Rock Anisotropy on MWD Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity Sensors”, SPWLA 35th Annual Logging Symposium, Jun. 19, 1994, 18 pgs.
Bonner, S. et al., “A New Generation of Electrode Resistivity Measurements for Formation Evaluation While Drilling”, SPWLA 35th Annual Logging Symposium, Jun. 19, 1994, pp. 1-19.
Bonner, Steve et al., “Resistivity While Drilling—Images from the String”, Oilfield Review, Spring 1996, pp. 4-19.
Callaghan, G., “HFSS Modeling of Cross-Coupling in Borehole Radar”, The Institution of Electrical Engineers, printed and published by IEEE, 2002, pp. 217-221, Savoy Place, London WC2R 0BL, UK, pp. 217-221.
Chou, Lawrence et al., “Steering Toward Enhanced Production”, Oilfield Review, Autumn 2006, pp. 54-63.
Clark, Brian et al., “A Dual Depth Resistivity Measurement for Fewd”, SPWLA 29th Annual Logging Symposium, Jun. 1988, 25 pgs.
Clark, Brian et al., “Electromagnetic Propagation Logging While Drilling: Theory and Experiment”, SPE Formation Evaluation, Sep. 1990, pp. 263-271.
Daniels, David J., “Surface-Penetrating Radar”, Electronics & Communication Engineering Journal, Aug. 1996, pp. 165-182.
Hagiwara, T., “A New Method to Determine Horizontal-Resistivity in Anisotropic Formations Without Prior Knowledge of Relative Dip”, 37th Annual SPWLA Logging Symposium, New Orleans, LA, Jun. 16, 1996, pp. 1-5 , plus 3 pgs of Figs.
Li, Qiming et al., “New Directional Electromagnetic Tool for Proactive Geosteering and Accurate Formation Evaluation While Drilling”, SPWLA 46th Annual Logging Symposium, Jun. 26-29, 2005, p. 1-16, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Liu, Sixin et al., “Application of Borehole Radar for Subsurface Physical Measurement”, Nanjing Institute of Geophysical Prospecting and Institute of Physics Publishing, J. Geophys. Eng. 1 (2004), pp. 221-227.
Liu, Sixin et al., “Electromagnetic Logging Technique Based on Borehole Radar”, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 40, No. 9, Sep. 2002, pp. 2083-2092.
Luling, Martin G. et al., “Processing and Modeling 2-MHz Resistivity Tools in Dipping, Laminated, Anisotropic Formations: SPWLA”, SPWLA 35th Annual Logging Symposium, Paper QQ, Jun. 19-22, 1994, 1994, pp. 1-25.
Mack, S. G. et al., “MWD Tool Accurately Measures Four Resistivities”, Oil & Gas Journal, May 25, 1992, pp. 1-5.
Mechetin, V. F. et al., “Temp—A New Dual Electromagnetic and Laterolog Apparatus—Technological Complex”, All-Union Research Logging Institute, Ufa, USSR. Ch. Ostrander, Petro Physics Int'l, Dallas, Texas, USA, Date Unkn, 17 pgs.
Meyer, W. H. , “New Two Frequency Propagation Resistivity Tools”, SPWLA 36th Annual Logging Symposium, Jun. 26-29, 1995, 12 pgs.
Moinfar, Ali et al., “Time-Lapse Variations of Multi-Component Electrical Resistivity Measurements Acquired in High-Angle Wells”, Moinfar, Ali, et al., “Time-Lapse Variations of Multi-Component Electrical Resistivity Measurements Acquired in High-Angle Wells,” Petrophysics, Dec. 2010, pp. 408-427, vol. 51, No. 6, 20 pgs.
Rodney, Paul F. et al., “Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity MWD Tool”, SPE Drilling Engineering, Oct. 1986, p. 337-346.
Van Dongen, Koen W. et al., “A Directional Borehole Radar System”, Subsurface Sensing Technologies and Applications, vol. 3, No. 4, Oct. 2002, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, pp. 327-346.
Zhu, Tianfei et al., “Two Dimensional Velocity Inversion and Synthetic Seismogram Computation”, Geophysics, vol. 52, No. 1, Jan. 1987, pp. 37-49.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150322774 A1 Nov 2015 US