Patent Grant
8453594
The present application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 of German Patent Application No. 10 2007 039 949.0, filed on Aug. 23, 2007, the disclosure of which is expressly incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a device for applying a suspension to which particles, in particular corundum particles, have been added onto a base plate, wherein the device has an applicator roll and a metering roll interacting with the applicator roll.
2. Discussion of Background Information
A device is known, e.g., from DE 20 2004 018 710. The suspension to be applied is applied to the rotating metering roll and applied to the applicator roll by the metering roll. The quantity of the suspension to be applied is adjusted via a doctor blade located on the metering axis. The suspension is then applied to the surface of the base plate by the applicator roll.
The disadvantage of such a device is that a reservoir of the suspension to be applied must be placed upstream in the direction of rotation of the doctor blade located on the metering roll, in order to guarantee an application that is uniform over the entire width of the roll. A relatively large amount of the suspension, e.g., containing corundum, is therefore always available in the device, which leads to increased production costs. Moreover, the suspension has a relatively long dwell time in the reservoir. A sedimentation of the solid particles contained in the suspension thereby occurs at least in part. The suspension therefore no longer has a homogenous particle density, which leads to an irregular distribution of the particles on the base plate.
Based on the above problem, the invention provides an improved device such that a higher distribution accuracy of the suspension to be applied is guaranteed.
To attain this advantage, the device of the present invention comprises an application groove with two groove halves projecting laterally and tilted downwards at an angle a to the horizontal with slots on the base side. That is, the two groove halves extend in the direction of a roller axis starting from the middle of a roller mill. The suspension to be applied is introduced centrally from above into the application groove through a feed pipe. Since both of the groove halves are embodied sloping downward outwardly, the suspension is distributed by the force of gravity over the entire width of the application groove. The suspension can exit downwards through the slots in the base of the application groove and is thus applied uniformly onto the metering roll. It is therefore no longer necessary to form a reservoir on the roll itself.
The application groove is preferably provided with a central feed pipe.
Advantageously, the application groove extends over the entire width of the roller mill. A uniform application of the suspension onto the metering roll is thus guaranteed.
The application groove preferably has a trapezoidal cross section, where the short side of the trapezoid forming the base. The suspension introduced through the feed pipe is thus optimally fed to the slots provided in the base.
The side walls of the application groove are embodied in a closed manner, so that no suspension introduced can exit here. The side walls are the walls that delimit the application groove in the direction of the roller axis.
The slots provided on the base of the application groove preferably have a variable width. It has proven to be advantageous if the width of the slots increases from the center of the application groove towards its edges. The width of the slots is measured perpendicular to the roller axis. This ensures that the same quantity of suspension is applied onto the metering roll over the entire width of the application groove without it being necessary for this to form a reservoir in the application groove.
A previously established quantity of the suspension to be applied is introduced into the application groove in the center of the application groove. A small part of this suspension exits through the relatively narrow slots in the center of the application groove and reaches the metering roll directly. In embodiments, the largest part flows outwards along the tilted groove halves. The quantity of the suspension present in the application groove steadily decreases towards the outside. An increasingly large proportion of this increasingly reduced quantity is guided away downwards in order to guarantee a homogenous distribution on the metering roll lying below the application groove. This is achieved by the width of the slots increasing towards the edge of the application groove. As noted above, the width of the slots is measured perpendicular to the roller axis.
The width of the slots advantageously increases from the center of the application groove towards the edge from 1 mm to 20 mm, particularly advantageously from 1 mm to 10 mm. The width of the slots is preferably continuously variable. The optimal slot width can thus be adjusted for any desired application quantity.
The angle α, at which the two groove halves are tilted outwards, is advantageously between 1° and 15°. An angle α of 5° has proven to be particularly advantageous. The flow characteristics of the suspension to be applied can be controlled through this tilt angle. This angle is preferably continuously variable. In this case the optimum gradient angle can be adjusted depending on the viscosity and the quantity of the suspension to be applied.
The surface of the metering roll and the applicator roll can be rubber-coated. Preferably the shore hardness of the rubber is 40 to 70, in particular preferably 55. EPDM (ethylene propylene diene monomer rubber) has proven to be suitable as the rubber.
Alternatively, the surface of the metering roll can also comprise ceramics or chromium-plated steel. The metering roll is preferably embodied as an anilox roller. The application quantity per area can be controlled by a grid comprising cells of certain size. The size of the cells and thus of the grid can vary.
If the surface of the applicator roll is provided with a fine grinding, the application quantity can be metered in a particularly precise manner, with a high distribution precision at the same time. A line-shaped or helical grinding pattern along the circumferential direction of the applicator roll has proven to be particularly suitable.
The present invention is further described in the detailed description which follows, in reference to the noted plurality of drawings by way of non-limiting examples of exemplary embodiments of the present invention, in which like reference numerals represent similar parts throughout the several views of the drawings, and wherein:
The particulars shown herein are by way of example and for purposes of illustrative discussion of the embodiments of the present invention only and are presented in the cause of providing what is believed to be the most useful and readily understood description of the principles and conceptual aspects of the present invention. In this regard, no attempt is made to show structural details of the present invention in more detail than is necessary for the fundamental understanding of the present invention, the description taken with the drawings making apparent to those skilled in the art how the several forms of the present invention may be embodied in practice. The embodiment described below uses a belt and chain drive as transmission steps by way of example. However, the mechanisms described can also be applied to gear trains.
In addition, by displacing the metering roll 4 or the applicator roll 3, the nip width between the two can be changed and the quantity of the applied suspension 1 on the base plate 2 can thus be controlled again. The surfaces of the applicator roll 3 and the metering roll 4 are coated such that the suspension 1 to be applied sticks to the applicator roll 3. The suspension 1 is transferred onto the base plate 2 by this applicator roll 3. This is shown more clearly in the enlarged section from
The suspension to be applied, which is not shown in
As in
The suspension 1 comprises a melamine resin corundum mixture and has a solid-resin proportion of 50% to 70%, preferably 60%, wherein additives, such as, for example, hardeners, wetting agents, release agents and flow-control agents as well as defoaming agents, are also added to the melamine resin, and in addition has a 30% to 60%, preferably 50% proportion of corundum, for example, aluminum oxide. The corundum has a size of approx. 0 to 120 μm. In addition to corundum, which serves to increase the abrasion resistance of the surface of the coated base plate, nanoparticles, for example silicon carbide can alternatively be added, which help to increase the scratch resistance of the surface. In addition, a reduction of dirt and bacteria will adhere to the surfaces equipped with nanoparticles.
A quantity of approximately 10 g/m2 to 70 g/m2, preferably 50 g/m2 can be applied by coordinating with one another the rotational direction and rotational speed of the metering roll 4 and the applicator roll 3. The distribution accuracy is thereby approximately 90%.
Both the applicator roll 3 and the metering roll 4 are equipped with a rubber-coated surface. The shore hardness of the rubber of the surface is 40 to 70 and preferably 55. EPDM has proven to be suitable as the rubber. The surface of the applicator roll 3 is additionally provided with a fine grinding. A line-shaped or helical grinding pattern along the circumferential direction of the applicator roll 3 has proven to be particularly suitable. With an applicator roll embodied in this manner the application quantity can be particularly precisely metered with distribution accuracy at the same time.
Through the rubber coating of the surface of the rolls 3, 4 no abrasion or hardly any abrasion of the roll bodies occurs, since it has surprisingly proven that the elasticity of the rubber-coated surfaces withstands without damage the transport of the suspension to which the abrasive corundum has been added.
Alternatively, the surface of the metering roll 4 can also be made of ceramic or chromium-plated steel.
It is noted that the foregoing examples have been provided merely for the purpose of explanation and are in no way to be construed as limiting of the present invention. While the present invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment, it is understood that the words which have been used herein are words of description and illustration, rather than words of limitation. Changes may be made, within the purview of the appended claims, as presently stated and as amended, without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention in its aspects. Although the present invention has been described herein with reference to particular means, materials and embodiments, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the particulars disclosed herein; rather, the present invention extends to all functionally equivalent structures, methods and uses, such as are within the scope of the appended claims.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2007 039 949 | Aug 2007 | DE | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1068006 | Pottinger | Jul 1913 | A |
| 1377976 | Smith | May 1921 | A |
| 1768247 | Gardner | Jun 1930 | A |
| 1918937 | Shelton | Jul 1933 | A |
| 2011029 | Barnwell | Aug 1935 | A |
| 2279361 | Amstuz | Apr 1942 | A |
| 2293691 | Harrigan | Aug 1942 | A |
| 2333902 | Thiele et al. | Nov 1943 | A |
| 2572513 | Paul | Oct 1951 | A |
| 2984874 | Traue | May 1961 | A |
| 3151368 | Dietert | Oct 1964 | A |
| 3289898 | Herman | Dec 1966 | A |
| 3620423 | Dalgleish | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3885519 | Orlowski | May 1975 | A |
| 4223632 | Cadwallader | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4287827 | Warner | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4358332 | Rodish | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4377230 | Burkner | Mar 1983 | A |
| 4603060 | Mitsuda et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4611965 | Dixon et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4737378 | Narita et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4738879 | Williams | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4741929 | Kossuth | May 1988 | A |
| 4949667 | Yoshida et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 5113760 | Sonobe et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5160377 | Montemayor et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5360620 | Hsu | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5382291 | Olioso | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5429676 | Uchida et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5670237 | Shultz et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5755883 | Kinose et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5863620 | Schafer | Jan 1999 | A |
| 6055781 | Johanson | May 2000 | A |
| 6129296 | Campbell et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6478564 | Tieu et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6523726 | Tschantz | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6592701 | Bonnebat et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6907908 | Weldy | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 7204883 | Rizzoli et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7632434 | Duescher | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7958840 | Chappa | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 20030116085 | Moden et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030143336 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20060147637 | Cooprider et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060177591 | Raday | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060226067 | Herron | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20080156212 | Yamada et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080196785 | Schmidhuber | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080217985 | Botha | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20090136679 | Boukaftane et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090223591 | Farnish | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090232998 | Krebs | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20100053239 | Furukawa | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100242839 | Fett et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20110244136 | Ryabova | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110293823 | Bruderer et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120318193 | Specht | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 616815 | Jul 1935 | DE |
| 101 31 027 | Jun 2001 | DE |
| 20 2004 018 710 | Apr 2005 | DE |
| 57-081859 | May 1982 | JP |
| 59-177159 | Oct 1984 | JP |
| 2002-204995 | Jul 2002 | JP |
| Entry |
|---|
| European Search Report for Corresponding European Application No. EP 08 01 3512. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20090050054 A1 | Feb 2009 | US |
