The present invention relates generally to radio transmitters using polar modulation.
Phase modulation schemes are very effective and are therefore widely used in communication systems. A simple example of a phase modulation scheme is quaternary phase shift keying (QPSK). This modulation scheme maps two-bit digital data to one of four phase offsets as shown in
The I/Q modulator provides a straightforward approach to generating phase-modulated signals. But, it's also possible to generate the phase-modulated signals using a polar transmitter such as the one shown in
In summary, the invention relates to a system and method for effecting precise time alignment of modulation signals applied within a polar transmitter.
A particular aspect of the invention is directed to a polar transmitter system including a direct synthesis modulator and a signal alignment module. The direct synthesis modulator is operative to generate an output signal based upon a reference signal. During this generation process the direct synthesis modulator is responsive to an amplitude modulation control signal and a frequency modulation control signal. A signal alignment module is configured to apply the amplitude modulation control signal and the frequency modulation control signal to the direct synthesis modulator in accordance with a defined timing relationship. The amplitude modulation control signal and the frequency modulation control signal are based upon an input amplitude modulation signal and an input phase or frequency modulation signal, respectively.
In another aspect the invention pertains to a signal alignment module for use with a polar transmitter. The alignment module includes a first latch arrangement which latches an input amplitude modulation signal and a second latch arrangement which latches an input phase or frequency modulation signal. A triggering network provides a first timing signal to the first latch arrangement and a second timing signal to the second latch arrangement. The triggering network also establishes a defined time offset between the first timing signal and the second timing signal.
A further aspect of the invention may be embodied in an alignment apparatus for use with a polar transmitter system. The alignment apparatus includes a signal alignment module configured to apply an amplitude modulation control signal and a frequency modulation control signal to the polar transmitter in accordance with a defined timing relationship. A time alignment network, operatively coupled between an output of the polar transmitter system and the signal alignment module, sets the defined timing relationship.
The present invention is also directed to an apparatus for adjusting signal time alignment within a polar transmitter system. The apparatus includes a signal alignment module operative to apply control signals to the polar transmitter system. The apparatus further includes a time alignment network for setting a timing relationship imposed upon the control signals by the signal alignment module. The time alignment network includes: a signal source unit coupled to the signal alignment module, a receiver coupled to an output of the polar transmitter system, and a control network coupled between an output of the receiver and the signal alignment module.
The foregoing aspects and the attendant advantages of the embodiments described herein will become more readily apparent by reference to the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
a shows a constellation diagram that illustrates how QPSK maps two-bit digital data to one of four offsets;
b illustrates the trajectory of the complex signal for QPSK modulation;
a shows one embodiment of a fractional-N PLL using a □□ modulator;
b illustrates the frequency response of the fractional-N PLL shown in
a illustrates one embodiment of a fractional-N PLL that supports direct frequency or phase modulation;
b illustrates the frequency response of the direct phase/frequency modulator shown in
a shows a simplified diagram of an amplitude modulation system using a variable gain amplifier;
b shows a simplified diagram of an amplitude modulation system using a switched power amplifier, controlled by a dc-dc regulator;
c shows a simplified diagram of an amplitude modulation system using feedback to linearize its response;
a illustrates the spectral regrowth in an EDGE polar transmitter due to 10 nSec timing error;
b illustrates the spectral regrowth in an WCDMA polar transmitter due to 2.5 nSec timing error;
a illustrates the performance sensitivity of the EDGE polar transmitter to timing errors;
b illustrates the performance sensitivity of the WCDMA polar transmitter to timing errors;
a shows a polar transmitter with timing alignment of the AM and FM signals using a delay-locked loop, in accordance with the present invention;
b shows a polar transmitter with timing alignment of the AM and FM signals using digital delay, in accordance with the present invention;
a shows a diagram of a system for adjusting the time alignment of polar transmitters, in accordance with the present invention;
b illustrates the symbol pattern used to enhance timing errors as part of the alignment system of
c illustrates the complex signal trajectory associated with the symbol pattern shown in
d shows a diagram of the digital signal source that generates the test signal associated with the alignment system of
e shows a diagram of an alternate system for adjusting the time alignment of polar transmitters, in accordance with the present invention;
a illustrates the frequency spectrum of a polar transmitter driven by the signal source described by
b illustrates the frequency spectrum of a polar transmitter driven by the signal source described by
a-d illustrate other examples of symbol patterns, similar to
Referring again to the transmitter architecture of
The phase-locked loop uses feedback to minimize the phase difference between a very accurate reference signal and its output signal. As such, it produces an output signal at a frequency given by
fVCO=NfREF
where fvco is the frequency of the VCO output signal, N is the value of the feedback counter, and fREF is the frequency of the reference signal.
The voltage-controlled oscillator produces an output signal at a frequency set by the control voltage vctrl according to
vout(t)=A cos(ωot+Kvco∫vctrl(t)dt)
where ωo is the free-running frequency of the oscillator and Kvco is its associated gain. The gain Kvco describes the relationship between the excess phase of the carrier Φout and the control voltage vctrl with
where Kvco is in radians/V. The VCO drives the feedback counter, which simply divides the output phase Φout by N. When the phase-locked loop is stable, the phase detector and charge pump circuits generate an output signal iCP that is proportional to the phase difference Δθ between the two signals applied to the phase detector. The output signal iCP can therefore be expressed as
where Kpd is in A/radians and Δθ is in radians. A simple integration filter, comprising resistor R1 and capacitors C1-C2 as shown in
where a zero (at 1/R1C1) has been added to stabilize the second order system and the capacitor C2 has been included to reduce any ripple on the control voltage. Combining the above relations yields the closed-loop response of the system to an input signal
In a PLL, the feedback counter value N effectively sets the output frequency. In practice, its digital structure restricts N to integer numbers. As a result, the frequency resolution (or frequency step size) of an integer-N PLL is nominally set by fREF. Fortunately, it's possible to dramatically decrease the effective frequency step by manipulating the value of N to yield a non-integer average value. This is the concept of the fractional-N PLL.
A fractional-N PLL that uses a ΔΣ modulator to develop non-integer values of N is shown in
where M[x] is the sequence of feedback counter values. This expands to
N[x]=Nint+n[x]
where Nint is the integer part and n[x] is the fractional part of N[x]. The ΔΣ modulator generates the sequence n[x] that satisfies
where k is the input to the ΔΣ modulator with resolution M.
It's possible to use a fractional-N PLL as a very efficient phase/frequency modulator. That's because signals applied to the ΔΣ modulator's input control and actually modulate the frequency of the VCO according to
fvco=fc+Δf(t)=(Nint+n[x])fREF
where Δf(t) is the frequency modulation equal to
and FM is the applied modulation signal. In practice, the modulation is shaped by the PLL response described by transfer function T1(s). The PLL's response generally limits the bandwidth of the system so as to attenuate the ΔΣ modulator's quantization noise. This is illustrated in
To overcome this bandwidth limitation, a second high-frequency modulation path is added to the phase-locked loop and VCO as shown in
where KFM is the gain of the VCO port at which the vFM modulating signal is applied. Ideally, the two expressions combine to yield a flat and uniform response as illustrated in
FMfREF=KFMvFM
The modulation applied to the fractional-N PLL and VCO adjusts the frequency of the output signal of the VCO, not its phase. To shift the phase of the output signal of the VCO, the phase modulation signal θ(t) must be differentiated with
where fc is the carrier frequency. Since the phase signal is formed digitally and then converted to analog form, a simple difference circuit is used to compute the derivative of the discrete phase data θ(x)
dθ(x+1)=θ(x+1)−dθ(x)
where x is the sample index and dθ(x) is the difference or derivative.
The fractional-N PLL and VCO generate a constant amplitude, phase/frequency-modulated signal centered at the carrier radio frequency. This allows the signal to be amplified using very efficient, compressed amplifiers. Unfortunately, the desired complex transmit signal typically shows envelop variations as illustrated by
There exist several methods to impress the amplitude modulation onto the VCO output signal.
s(t)=A(t)sin [2π(fc+FM)t]
where A(t) is the amplitude modulation and is always positive. This approach—known as small-signal polar modulation or polar lite—eases design but requires a linear power amplifier. It also minimizes the time delay and associated alignment error between the phase/frequency modulator and the amplitude modulator. In most situations, the TXF filter is included to attenuate receive band noise.
b shows a second approach. It includes a buffer, driver amplifier, filter, and switched power amplifier supplied by a dc-dc regulator. In this approach, the amplitude modulation is applied through a dc-dc regulator. The dc-dc regulator produces an output level V+ that tracks the AM signal and consequently restricts the power amplifier's signal swing. It follows that the power amplifier switches between its saturation voltage Vsat and 2V+ with
s(t)□A(t){1+sign(sin [2π(fc+FM)t])}+Vsat
A driver amplifier boosts the amplitude of the phase/frequency modulated signal to ensure the switched PA fully switches even at high AM and V+ levels. In practice, the switching operation of the PA produces multiple harmonics that must be attenuated by the its output matching network. To minimize noise, the dc-dc regulator typically uses large capacitors which unfortunately slow the response to the amplitude modulation input. The TXF filter is used to attenuate any wideband noise that could fold in band due to the amplifier's switching response.
c shows a third method for amplitude modulation. It consists of a buffer, variable gain amplifier, power amplifier, and feedback network to control the transmitter's output. The feedback network linearizes the response to the amplitude modulation signal A(t). However, as with any feedback network, its behavior—and particularly its delay—depends on the loop parameters which unfortunately vary. This means the required offset to align the amplitude modulation to the phase/frequency modulation also varies.
Ideally, the amplitude modulation precisely aligns to the phase/frequency modulation, avoiding spectral regrowth and EVM degradation. Even small timing errors affect the frequency spectrum of the complex transmit signal. This is illustrated in
Timing errors also distort the transmitted signal and thereby affect the ability of a receiver to properly detect the message data. This effect is measured by the error vector magnitude (EVM). The sensitivity of the modulation system to timing error varies with the symbol rate—making WCDMA systems (3.84 Mcps) much more sensitive than EDGE systems (270 ksps).
Fortunately, the system shown in
b shows another method to generate time-aligned AM and FM modulation control data based upon the input AM and FM digital data. In this approach the signal alignment module operates digitally to adjust the delay of the input AM signal through a delay equalizer or programmable filter.
The delay is selected using the time alignment network shown in
The test signal is applied and the AM/FM timing is aligned when the transmitter is first activated. In practice, this is sufficient since any delay changes should be small. If needed, the calibration can be repeated in any empty transmission slot.
The alignment network exploits a special class of complex transmit signals that enhance timing errors. This special class of complex transmit signals simply isolates amplitude and phase changes.
I=[r1,0,0,−r2,−r1,0,0,r2] and Q=[0,r2,r1,0,0,−r2,−r1,0]
where r1>r2. These sequences generate a signal that changes amplitude moving from odd symbols to even symbols and changes phase moving from even symbols to odd symbols.
The digital signal source interpolates the special complex transmit signal to smooth the frequency and amplitude modulation signals. This results in the complex signal trajectory illustrated in
e shows an alternative approach to align the AM and FM signals. It is based on the digital delay concept of
The frequency spectrum produced by the polar transmitter operating at a carrier frequency of 825 MHz and with the complex pattern of
The radio receiver, configured to track the 821.5 MHz tone, easily detects the level. It in turn drives the controller to increase/decrease the offset of the delay from the delay-locked loop by selecting different output signals. The parabolic shape of
The signal source makes detection of the timing error easy. It relies on a newly-defined class of complex transmit signals that simply isolates amplitude and phase changes. Since this is a class of signals, multiple variations are possible, including, but not limited to,
The alignment network properly adjusts the polar transmitter to minimize spectral regrowth and EVM degradation due to timing errors.
The foregoing description, for purposes of explanation, used specific nomenclature to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the specific details are not required in order to practice the invention. In other instances, well-known circuits and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid unnecessary distraction from the underlying invention. Thus, the foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention are presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, obviously many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical applications, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the following Claims and their equivalents define the scope of the invention.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/822,357, entitled TIME ALIGNMENT OF A POLAR TRANSMITTER, filed on Aug. 14, 2006, which is incorporated by reference herein for all purposes. This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/265,215, entitled DIRECT SYNTHESIS TRANSMITTER, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4263560 | Ricker | Apr 1981 | A |
4430627 | Machida | Feb 1984 | A |
4769588 | Panther | Sep 1988 | A |
4816772 | Klotz | Mar 1989 | A |
4926135 | Voorman | May 1990 | A |
4965531 | Riley | Oct 1990 | A |
5006818 | Koyama et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5015968 | Podell et al. | May 1991 | A |
5030923 | Arai | Jul 1991 | A |
5289136 | DeVeirman et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5331292 | Worden et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5399990 | Miyake | Mar 1995 | A |
5491450 | Helms et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5508660 | Gersbach et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5548594 | Nakamura | Aug 1996 | A |
5561385 | Choi | Oct 1996 | A |
5581216 | Ruetz | Dec 1996 | A |
5625325 | Rotzoll et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5631587 | Co et al. | May 1997 | A |
5648744 | Prakash et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5677646 | Entrikin | Oct 1997 | A |
5739730 | Rotzoll | Apr 1998 | A |
5767748 | Nakao | Jun 1998 | A |
5818303 | Oishi et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5834987 | Dent | Nov 1998 | A |
5862465 | Ou | Jan 1999 | A |
5878101 | Aisaka | Mar 1999 | A |
5880631 | Sahota | Mar 1999 | A |
5939922 | Umeda | Aug 1999 | A |
5945855 | Momtaz | Aug 1999 | A |
5949286 | Jones | Sep 1999 | A |
5990740 | Groe | Nov 1999 | A |
5994959 | Ainsworth | Nov 1999 | A |
5999056 | Fong | Dec 1999 | A |
6011437 | Sutardja et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018651 | Bruckert et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6031425 | Hasegawa | Feb 2000 | A |
6044124 | Monahan et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6052035 | Nolan et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6057739 | Crowley et al. | May 2000 | A |
6060935 | Shulman | May 2000 | A |
6091307 | Nelson | Jul 2000 | A |
6100767 | Sumi | Aug 2000 | A |
6114920 | Moon et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6163207 | Kattner et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173011 | Rey et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191956 | Foreman | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6204728 | Hageraats | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211737 | Fong | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229374 | Tammone, Jr. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246289 | Pisati et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255889 | Branson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259321 | Song et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6288609 | Brueske et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298093 | Genrich | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6333675 | Saito | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6370372 | Molnar et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392487 | Alexanian | May 2002 | B1 |
6404252 | Wilsch | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6476660 | Visocchi et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6515553 | Filiol et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6559717 | Lynn et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6560448 | Baldwin et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6571083 | Powell, II et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6577190 | Kim | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6583671 | Chatwin | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6583675 | Gomez | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6639474 | Asikainen et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6664865 | Groe et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6683509 | Albon et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6693977 | Katayama et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6703887 | Groe | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6711391 | Walker et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6724235 | Costa et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6734736 | Gharpurey | May 2004 | B2 |
6744319 | Kim | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751272 | Burns et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6753738 | Baird | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6763228 | Prentice et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6774740 | Groe | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6777999 | Kanou et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6781425 | Si | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6795843 | Groe | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6798290 | Groe et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801089 | Costa et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6845139 | Gibbons | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6856205 | Groe | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6870411 | Shibahara et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6917719 | Chadwick | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6940356 | McDonald, II et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6943600 | Craninckx | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6975687 | Jackson et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985703 | Groe et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990327 | Zheng et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7062248 | Kuiri | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065334 | Otaka et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7088979 | Shenoy et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7123102 | Uozumi et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7142062 | Vaananen et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7148764 | Kasahara et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7171170 | Groe et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7215215 | Hirano et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
20020071497 | Bengtsson et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020135428 | Gomez | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020193009 | Reed | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030078016 | Groe et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030092405 | Groe et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030118143 | Bellaouar et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030197564 | Humphreys et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040017852 | Redman-White | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040051590 | Perrott et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050093631 | Groe | May 2005 | A1 |
20050099232 | Groe et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060003720 | Lee et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070275676 | Rofougaran et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60822357 | Aug 2006 | US |