None
The present invention relates to signal interface management on a signal bus. More particularly, the present invention relates to placing signals on a shared serial bus in a manner that allows the serial bus to be shared on a time division multiplexed basis.
Processors have input and output lines for communication of signals with other devices. Theses input and output lines are grouped into busses for communication of signals in parallel or serial communication. Drivers are connected to the input and/or output lines to drive signals on these lines. Often more than one driver is connected to a single line and the line is multiplexed to accept signals from different drivers. One form of multiplexing is accomplished by time dividing the input to the signal line so that each driver is provide one or more time slots for driving the signal line.
For example, as illustrated in
Presently this problem is addressed by using logic gates to OR the signals together. This method has a significant disadvantage in that pull-down resistors must be used to drive the inactive signals low to the OR gate input. For high frequency busses, these pull-down resistors must have rather small resistances (200-500 Ohms) to pull the signal down quickly enough. This causes significant and unwanted power consumption.
The multiplexed serial bus interface of the DSP of the present invention is programmable such that the inactive state may be ‘1’, ‘0’, or hi-impedance. In cases where the frequency is low and the system uses a wire-OR'ed approach, the inactive state can be hi-impedance. In systems that require a high frequency that necessitates logically connecting the BDX signals together, the inactive state can be programmed to be ‘0’ or ‘1’. If the inactive state is ‘0’, the signals are connected with a logic OR gate. If an AND gate is used instead, the inactive state is programmed to be ‘1’.
This invention is not limited to the DSP multiplexed serial bus interface; it is applicable to any similar bus system. The advantages of using this invention include the elimination of pull-up and/or pull-down resistors thus reducing the wasting of power. The bandwidth of the interface is also maximized by reduction of wait times for line release.
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention are discussed with reference to the following drawings:
As illustrated in the timing diagram of
To avoid bus contention, each driver must wait until the previous driver turns off before it can start driving the bus. This turn-off time imposes a limit to the maximum frequency that the serial bus may transfer data.
The present invention reduces this turn-off time by taking advantage of the fact that the driver will switch to a predefined voltage rail much faster than it will switch to a high impedance state. In order to achieve a stable high impedance state, the driver must be turned off. This process of turning off the driving typically takes much longer than just changing the state of the output from ‘1’ to ‘0’ or from ‘0’ to ‘1’.
By setting the off state of a driver to ‘0’ instead of high impedance, the present invention reduces the time for a driver to reach the off state. The time for a driver to reach a stable state upon connection to either power rail is short in comparison to the time necessary to reach a high impedance state.
In one embodiment, as illustrated in
If the signals from the two drivers of
Bus contention can alternatively be eliminated by connecting the output of the two drivers 16 and 18, through a logic AND gate 26. When one driver is in its off or inactive state it drives a 1 to the AND gate 26, the output of the AND gate 26 will therefore reflect the input from the other driver. When one driver inputs an inactive ‘1’, a ‘0’ from the other driver will produce a ‘0’ on line I 2. Similarly, when one driver inputs an inactive ‘1’, a ‘1’ from the other driver will produce a ‘1’ at line 12. Thus, an AND gate 26 will cause the active driver signal to be reproduced on line 12 when the inactive driver is tied to logic ‘1’ in its off state.
Because many varying and different embodiments may be made within the scope of the inventive concept herein taught, and because many modifications may be made in the embodiments herein detailed in accordance with the descriptive requirements of the law, it is to be understood that the details herein are to be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5440247 | Kaplinsky | Aug 1995 | A |
5847580 | Bapat et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5973506 | Trimberger | Oct 1999 | A |
5999013 | Elliott | Dec 1999 | A |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030184341 A1 | Oct 2003 | US |