This application is related to the technology disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,515,084, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
None.
The invention relates to chip-scale analog beam forming engine for receive and/or transmit Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) applications.
This invention relates to a novel chip-scale analog beam forming engine for receive array applications consisting of IC chips. The beam forming engine is based upon HRL's Asynchronous Pulse Processor (APP) circuit technology disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,592,939 entitled “Digital domain to pulse domain time encoder” the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. APP involves using Pulse domain processing with time encoders. Pulse processing for other applications is described in other issued US patents assigned to the assignee of the present application, which include: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,403,144; 7,515,084; 7,724,168; and 7,822,698 for other applications in: frequency filtering (implementing a filter with a given frequency transfer characteristic without beam forming); Analog-to-Digital-Conversion (converting a single analog signal into the digital domain without beam forming); implementation of linear programming circuits (for solving a specific class optimization mathematical problems without beam forming); and implementation of nonlinear processors (for realizing neural networks without beam forming). U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,403,144; 7,515,084; 7,724,168; and 7,822,698 are all incorporated herein by reference,
This invention enables ultra wide bandwidth, low cost and low complexity receive Active Electronically Scanned Arrays (AESA) that are not practical using prior art technologies. Key features of proposed APP-based beam forming engine is that it (1) is scalable up to millimeter wave frequencies and up to extremely large size two- and three-dimensional arrays with arbitrary numbers of independent beams, (2) enables ultra wideband operations with wide instantaneous bandwidth, (3) is affordable since it enables potentially low cost RF CMOS, chip-scale highly modular architectures, (4) is easily extendable to transmit arrays, and (5) provides high Dynamic Range (DR) and linearity operation.
Prior art receive AESA technologies include (a) traditional analog beam forming approaches that utilize conventional phase shifting and time delay devices, (b) element level digital beam forming approaches that utilize a high DR and wide bandwidth Analog-to-Digital Converter (ADC) in each antenna element and (c) subarray level digital beam forming approaches that utilize analog beam forming approaches for the subarrays and use only one ADC for each subarray. Comparison of above array technologies along with the disclosed APP based beam forming approach with respect to required control complexity, Spurious Free Dynamic Range (SFDR) of ADCs, dispersion loss and bandwidth are summarized in Table I below:
Traditional analog beam forming approaches utilize passive or active phase shifters, photonics beam forming approaches that are based upon photonics true time delay elements i.e., long optical cables distributed across the array, and switched transmission lines.
Passive or active phase shifters are inherently narrowband devices that cannot be used for wide bandwidth operation. Also, they are physically large and lossy devices.
In photonics beam forming approach the RF input signals from the antenna elements first need to be converted into optical signals where the beam forming operation is achieved by the delay operation in the optical cables. Then the time delayed optical signals need to be transformed back from optical to RF and need to be digitized and further processed. The RF-to-optical and optical-to-RF transformations are typically lossy processes that require power hungry optical modulator and demodulator devices. Also, a large number of long and precisely cut optical cables are required to obtain fine granulites in the beam angle resolution. While the photonics beam forming based AESA can have wide operational bandwith, its complexity for even medium size arrays is prohibitive. The switched transmission lines beam forming approach requires fast, wide bandwidth and low loss switching devices along with wide bandwith, low loss and long transmission lines. Unfortunately, neither reliable switching devices nor low cost low loss transmission line technology exist today. The RF MEMS switch technology that could provide low loss wide bandwidth RF switches is still in its infancy. Superconductor technology could provide low loss wide bandwidth transmission lines but the cost is prohibitive for all practical applications.
Element level digital beam forming approaches of the prior art utilize a high DR and wide bandwidth Analog-to-Digital Conventer (ADC) in each antenna element. No wideband and high DR (SFDR) ADCs are known by the inventors hereof to exist which makes that prior art approach impractical. No ADCs are required at the antenna elements of the beamformer of the invention.
In one aspect the present invention provides a method of delaying a pulse domain signal comprising: applying an inputted pulse domain signal to a time encoder circuit; and controlling an amount of true time delay imposed by said time encoder on said inputted pulse domain signal by controlling the gains of an input transconductance amplifier or 1-bit DAC and a feedback 1-bit DAC in said time encoder.
In another aspect the present invention provides a time encoder circuit which is responsive to a received pulse domain signal and which outputs a true time delayed output signal with the amount of time delay being a function of gains of devices used in said time encoder circuit.
In yet another aspect the present invention provides an apparatus for beam-forming an received incident RF signal comprising a first plurality of time encoders each having inputs for receiving an inputted pulse domain signal, the time encoders imposing a controlled amount of time delay on the inputted pulse domain signal by controlling the gains of an input transconductance amplifier or 1-bit DAC and a feedback 1-bit DAC in each said time encoder, the time encoders being arranged in pairs wherein the gain of a first input transconductance amplifier or 1-bit DAC in a first one of said time encoders in each pair of said time encoders and the gain of a second input transconductance amplifier or 1-bit DAC in a second one of each said time encoders in pair of said time encoders are controlled in common and wherein the gain of a first feedback 1-bit DAC in a first one of said time encoder in each pair of said time encoders and the gain of a second feedback 1-bit DAC in a second one of said time encoder in each pair of said time encoders are controlled in common.
a and 2b depict the TE of
This invention utilizes arrays of time encoders to form both receive and transmit beamformers. A prior art embodiment of a time encoder 10 is now described with reference to
An important circuit component of disclosed beamformers is a programmable Pulse Domain True Time Delay (PDTTD) circuit element 15 of
The PDTTDs 15 are preferably utilized in cascaded pairs as shown in
Receive Beamformer
An embodiment of a receive beamformer in accordance with the present invention is depicted by
In
Perhaps an explanation of the nomenclature used here might to useful for the reader. The reader has probably noted that the incoming signal first goes to a second stage chip 200 which outputs to a first stage chip 100. The first stage chip 100 is called “first” simply because it is closer (signal-wise) to a downstream digital processor (not shown) than are the second stage chips 200.
At the outputs of the second-stage beam forming chips 200 four independent beams are formed by time delaying and combining the incoming RF signals from each antenna element 20 according to the row delay requirements needed for spaced antenna elements along a horizontal direction as shown in
Important features of this AESA receive technology are that it: 1) provides a digital representation of high Dynamic Range and linearity output signal per beam; 2) is relatively low cost since it enables potentially low-cost SiGe/CMOS, chip-scale highly modular architectures; 3) is easily scalable up to millimeter-wave frequencies using existing integrated circuit technologies and up to extremely large two-dimensional arrays (similar circuitry could be used to implement three-dimensional arrays—the two and three dimensional array may have arbitrary numbers of independent beams); 4) enables ultra-wideband operations with wide instantaneous bandwidth; and 5) is extendable to transmit arrays (which arrays are discussed below).
An important component of disclosed ultra-wideband, chip-scale analog beam forming engine is a small set of unit element-based mixed-signal (SiGe BiCMOS or InP, for example) chips utilizing modified TEs 15 as depicted by
The APDP can effectively implement advanced signal-processing algorithms where the signal amplitude is kept discrete, usually binary, and the time is continuous. The two salient features of the APDP-based approach are that it overcomes the limitations of 1) voltage resolution of analog signals in deep-submicron processes (transistors having gate dimensions much less than a micron) and 2) the programmability of traditional analog processors.
It is to be noted that disclosed ultra-wideband, chip-scale analog beam forming engine utilizes a set of modified TEs 15 which are used in various ways and sometimes modified (as in element 60), but which can be implemented, for example, as relatively inexpensive SiGe BiCMOS chips or as more expensive, but faster, InP chips.
Only one First Stage Receive Beam Forming Chip 100 is required for the 2 by 8 array of
a) depicts block 400 having four pulse to digital converter circuits 410. The number of circuits 410 in block 400 can be modified depending on the number of different signals received from different beams. This should match the number of output channels of the beamformer chip of
Transmit Beamformer
Three-dimensional rendering of a 2-by-4 element AESA transmit embodiment of disclosed APP-based beamformer is shown in
Antenna elements 20 shown in
Appendix A depicts a simulation and the simulation results of a behavioral simulation of a time encoded based transmit beamformer of the invention with just four antenna elements 20. Part A of Appendix A shows the circuit model. It consists of the circuit of
The top graph (Minimum delay: 3.275 ps per TE) of Appendix A shows the case in which the TEs are programmed to have a small delay (3.275 ps in the simulation). The four outputs (Labeled as signal 1 to signal 4 in the figure) have identical shape, showing no distortion of the signal, as desired. The four outputs are relatively shifted in time, with the signal 1 ahead of signal 2, the signal 2 ahead of signal 3, and the signal 3 ahead of signal 4. This is what is desired to steer the beam to the left.
The middle graph (Mid delay: 11.087 ps per TE) of Appendix A shows the case in which the TEs are programmed to have a medium delay (11.087 ps in the simulation). The four outputs (Labeled as signal 1 to signal 4 in the figure) have identical shape, showing no distortion of the signal, as desired. The four outputs are not shifted in time, with the signals 1, 2, 3 and 4 all coincident. This is what is desired to steer the beam to the front.
The bottom graph (Maximum delay: 18.9 ps per TE) of Appendix A shows the case in which the TEs are programmed to have a large delay (18.9 ps in the simulation). The four outputs (Labeled as signal 1 to signal 4 in the figure) have identical shape, showing no distortion of the signal, as desired. The four outputs are relatively shifted in time, with the signal 1 behind of signal 2, the signal 2 behind of signal 3, and the signal 3 behind of signal 4. This is what is desired to steer the beam to the right.
Modifications
The antenna arrays in both the receive and transmit embodiments is presented as a 2 row by 8 antenna element array. Those skilled in this art will be able to scale the designs presented into much larger arrays and also into single row arrays as needed in particular applications. Of course, the number of 2TE and MTE circuits will need to grow as needed with larger arrays of antenna elements. The level of integration can also be modified as desired. For example, one first stage chip 100 and two second stage chips 200 are shown as supporting a 2 row by 8 antenna element array. But those skilled in the art well realize that these three chips could all be integrated together as a single SiGe/CMOS or InP chip and/or that other chip chemistries that the two suggested herein may be used as needed or desired. So the number of chips used in practicing this invention can vary widely depending on the size of the antenna array and the complexity (level of integration) of the resulting chip or chips.
Having described the invention in connection with certain embodiments thereof, modification will now suggest itself to those skilled in the art. As such, the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiment except as is specifically required by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4383248 | Smith | May 1983 | A |
4939515 | Adelson | Jul 1990 | A |
5185715 | Zikan | Feb 1993 | A |
5345398 | Lippmann | Sep 1994 | A |
5396244 | Engel | Mar 1995 | A |
5479170 | Cauwenbergh | Dec 1995 | A |
5490062 | Leach | Feb 1996 | A |
5566099 | Shimada | Oct 1996 | A |
5815102 | Melanson | Sep 1998 | A |
5894280 | Ginetti | Apr 1999 | A |
5910763 | Flanagan | Jun 1999 | A |
6087968 | Roza | Jul 2000 | A |
6111531 | Farag | Aug 2000 | A |
6172536 | Yoshihara | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6452524 | Fraleigh | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6473019 | Ruha | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6940438 | Koe | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6975682 | Cosand | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7038608 | Gilbert | May 2006 | B1 |
7148829 | Inukai | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7180432 | Oliaei | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7253761 | Hoyos | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7277797 | Kunitsyn | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7324035 | Harris | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7403144 | Cruz-Albrecht | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7405686 | Laroia | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7515084 | Cruz-Albrecht | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7573956 | Lazar et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7583213 | Wang et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7592939 | Cruz-Albrecht | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7724168 | Cruz-Albrecht et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7750835 | Cruz-Albrecht | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7822698 | Cruz-Albrecht | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7965216 | Petre | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7996452 | Cruz-Albrecht | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8169212 | Rivoir | May 2012 | B2 |
8566265 | Cruz-Albrecht | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8595157 | Cruz-Albrecht | Nov 2013 | B2 |
20050190865 | Lazar | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060087467 | Itskovich | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060092059 | Guimaraes | May 2006 | A1 |
20070069928 | Gehring | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20090303070 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100225824 | Lazar et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100321064 | Mathe | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110028141 | Yang et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120213531 | Nazarathy et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 14/032,082, Cruz-Albrect, filed Sep. 19, 2013. |
Author: Wikipedia; Title: “Relaxation oscillator”; URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relaxation—oscillator, Printed: Jun. 18, 2010 (6 pages). |
Author: Wikipedia; Title: “Van der Pol oscillator”; URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van—der—Pol—osciliator, Printed: Jun. 18, 2010 (3 pages). |
Cruz, J.M., et al, “A 16×16 Cellular Neural Network Universal Chip: The First Complete Single-Chip Dynamic Computer Array with Distributed Memory and with Gray Scale Input-Output,” Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 15, pp. 227-237, 1998. |
Dighe, A.M., et al., “An Asynchronous Serial Flash Converter”, 9th Int. Conf on Electronics, Circuits and Systems, IEEE, pp. 13-15, 2002. |
Donoho, D. “Compressed Sensing”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 1289-1306, Apr. 2006. |
Hasler et al., “VLSI Neural Systems and Circuits” 1990 IEEE, pp. 31-27. |
Indiveri, Giacomo, “A Low-Power Adaptive Integrated-and-fire Neuron Circuit”, IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, vol. IV, pp. 820-823, 2003. |
Iwamoto, M. et al., “Bandpass Delta-Sigma Class-S Amplifier”, Electronic Letters, vol. 36, No. 12, pp. 1010-1012, Jun. 2000. |
Izhikevich, Eugene M., “Which Model to Use for Cortical Spiking Neurons?”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 15, No. 5, Sep. 2004, pp. 1063-1070. |
Keane, J. and Atlas, L. “Impulses and Stochastic Arithmetic for Signal Processing” Proc. 2001 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, pp. 1257-1260. |
Lazar, A. and Toth, L., “Perfect Recovery and Sensitivity Analysis of Time Encoded Bandlimited Signals,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems-I, vol. 51, No. 10, pp. 2060-2073, Oct. 2004. |
Ouzounov, S. et al. “Design of High-Performance Asynchronous Sigma Delta Modulators with a Binary Quantizer with Hysteresis”, IEEE 2004 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 2004, pp. 181-184. |
Perrinet, Laurent, “Emergence of filters from natural scenes in a sparse spike coding scheme,” 2004, pp. 821-826. |
Roza, E., “Analog to Digital Conversion via Duty Cycle Modulation,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems-II, vol. 44, No. 11, pp. 907-914, Nov. 1997. |
Walden, R., “Analog to Digital Converter Survey and Analysis”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 539-550, Apr. 1999. |
Wang, et al. “Review of pulse-coupled neural networks,” 2009, pp. 5-13. |
Xia, Y. and Wang, J. “A Recurrent Neural Network for Solving Nonlinear Convex Programs Subject to Linear Constraints”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 16, No. 2, Mar. 2005. |
PCT Search Report dated Jan. 14, 2013 from PCT/US2012/040043. |
PCT Written Opinion dated Jan. 14, 2013 from PCT/US2012/040043. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 2, 2013 from PCT/US2012/040043. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,107 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,996,4520), Office Action mailed on Jun. 24, 2010. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,107 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,996,4520), Office Action mailed on Nov. 29, 2010. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,107 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,996,4520), Notice of Allowance mailed on Apr. 4, 2011. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 11/726,484 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,515,084), Office Action mailed on May 22, 2008. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 11/726,484 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,515,084), Office Action mailed on Sep. 10, 2008. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 11/726,484 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,515,084), Notice of Allowance mailed on Dec. 2, 2008. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 11/726,860 (now published as U.S. Pat. No. 7,822,698), Office Action mailed on Mar. 8, 2010. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 11/726,860 (now published as U.S. Pat. No. 7,822,698), Notice of Allowance mailed on Jun. 11, 2010. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 12/118,475 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,592,939), Notice of Allowance mailed on May 22, 2009. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 12/262,691 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,965,216), Office Action mailed on Apr. 7, 2010. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 12/262,691 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,965,216), Office Action mailed on Aug. 23, 2010. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 12/262,691 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,965,216), Notice of Allowance mailed on Feb. 17, 2011. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 12/262,782 (now published as U.S. Pat. No. 7,724,168), Notice of Allowance mailed on Jan. 11, 2010. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 12/266,299 (now published as U.S. Pat. No. 7,750,835), Notice of Allowance mailed on Mar. 22, 2010. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 12/266,299 (now published as U.S. Pat. No. 7,750,835), Notice of Allowance mailed on Jun. 22, 2010. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,922 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,566,265), Notice of Allowance mailed on Jun. 20, 2013. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/151,763 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,595,157), Notice of Allowance mailed on Jul. 18, 2013. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 14/032,082 (unpublished, non publication request filed), Office Action mailed on Sep. 10, 2014. |