The research work described here was performed under a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) between Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) and Chevron under the LANL-Chevron Alliance, CRADA number LA05C10518.
Pore pressures are the fluid pressures in the pore spaces in porous formations. Knowledge of pore pressure in a formation is valuable for planning drilling operations and for geochemical and geological analyses. The pore pressure gradient is used in drilling for determining mud weight, which is selected based on pore pressure gradient, wellbore stability and fracture gradient prior to setting and cementing a casing. Drilling fluid is then applied in the form of mud pressure to support the wellbore walls for preventing influx and wellbore collapse during drilling. Geological analyses include initial reserve estimation and fluid contact identification.
Presently, formation pore pressure characterization is achieved through direct formation probe contact either in an open hole or through flow testing from perforations after the wellbore has been cased and cemented. Pore pressure may also be measured directly by well production testing with open hole packer isolation.
Investigation of elastic nonlinearity of materials has broad applications, including medical imaging, civil engineering, and geophysics, since elastic nonlinearity is a sensitive measurement of mechanical damage in solids.
To achieve the purposes of the embodiments of the present invention, as embodied and broadly described herein, the method for determining pore pressure in a formation through a borehole having a metal casing, hereof includes: generating low frequency, sinusoidal acoustic signal, having a chosen frequency and amplitude focused in a volume surrounding the borehole and effective for generating strain in the volume; transmitting pulsed, high frequency acoustic signals through the volume; measuring signals generated in the formation in the volume relating to particle velocity or particle acceleration in the formation from which the generated strain is determined; and measuring time-of-flight of the pulsed, high frequency acoustic signals through the volume for a known strain; whereby the change of the time-of-flight of the pulsed, high frequency acoustic signals as a function of the generated strain is determined, from which the pore pressure is determined.
In another aspect of the embodiments of the present invention for achieving the purposes thereof, as embodied and broadly described herein the apparatus for measuring pore pressure in a formation through a borehole having a metal casing, hereof includes: a transceiver trained to focus time-reversed acoustic signals in a focal volume centered on the borehole; a probe source comprising a transmitting transducer for transmitting high frequency acoustic pulses into the focal volume; a receiver comprising a receiving transducer for receiving the high frequency acoustic pulses transmitted by the probe source, from the focal volume; a signal processor for measuring the time-of-flight of the received high frequency acoustic pulses; and a sensor disposed in contact with the metal casing for measuring particle velocity or particle acceleration from which the strain in the volume is determined.
Benefits and advantages of embodiments of the present invention include, but are not limited to, providing an apparatus and method for measuring pore pressure in a rock formation in cased and open hole environments without direct contact with the formation.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of the specification, illustrate the embodiments of the present invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:
Briefly, the present invention includes the measurement of formation pore pressure either through a pipe after a well is cased and cemented, or in an open hole, thereby eliminating direct contact with the formation. This may be accomplished by using the Dynamic Acoustic Elasticity (DAE) method for characterizing nonlinear parameters by perturbing a selected rock formation region with a High Amplitude, Low Frequency (HALF) acoustic strain wave, and probing this region with a Low Amplitude, High Frequency (LAHF) acoustic wave. Accurate values for the pore pressure in a formation are valuable for the prediction of gas/water contacts, which permit more accurate location of hydrocarbons in the formation.
The change in wave speed as the HALF induced strain field oscillation propagates through the formation is linked to the nonlinear elastic parameters α, β, δ, and A of the pore pressure. The modulation of the time of flight of LAHF probe pulses by the imposed acoustic (HALF or pump) changes in the formation strain are measured. The perturbations in the formation caused by the pump are sufficiently long to permit many probe pulses to be sent at different times in the pump cycle, typically hundreds or thousands of probe pulses for a 0.5 s to 1 s pump pulse. Effective probe pulses are sufficiently short to be resolvable without interfering with each other so that the relative timing of the arrival of the pulses can readily be measured.
Frequency mixing and resonance-based nonlinear ultrasonic measurements, where ultrasonic or acoustic waves propagate through a statically stressed specimen, permit extraction of average variations of modulus and attenuation versus strain level (generally only compressive), but by contrast require static strain levels >10−4 to be properly measured.
The following is a short description of DAE measurements which generate “butterfly” shapes from which the parameters α, β, δ, and A may be determined.
In a DAE measurement a “pump” strain field, characterized by the amplitude of the pump strain Apump, is established in the sample. At ti the pump strain in the sample is given by
εpump(ti)=Apump sin(ωpumpti) (1)
The elastic state of the sample at ti is inspected with a low amplitude “probe” pulse that crosses the strain field of the sample at time ti. In crossing the sample at ti the probe pulse senses the sample experiencing strain field εpump(ti). The time for the probe pulse to cross the sample at ti is tcross(εpump(ti)). The quantity of interest is the change in crossing time brought about by the pump strain, that is,
Δti=tcross(εpump(ti))−tcross(0)=ω/ci−ω/c0≈(ω/c0)·Δci/c0 (2)
or
Δci/c0=−Δti/t0,t0=ω/c0, (3)
where ω is the length of the path the probe pulse traverses, ci=c(εpump(ti)), and c0=c(εpump=0). The probe pulse is directed across the sample at all possible phases of the pump strain. The change in crossing time or the change in c is measured as a function of the pump strain at the time of crossing, Δc/c0 vs εpump.
Data includes Δc/c0 (plotted on the y-axis) as a function of the pump strain field (εp) (plotted on the x-axis). The pump strain is of order 5μ-strain, and the velocity shifts are negative and of order 2×10−3. The velocity shift has a negative DC value of order 10−3. The shift in velocity is to be represented as a function of the pump strain (denoted here as εp) in the form:
Δc(εp)/c0=½[αAp+β(εp)+δ(εp)2+A(εp)], (4)
where αAP is the intercept that depends on the amplitude the pump strain, AP, β is the coefficient of (εp), δ is the coefficient of (εp)2, and A(εp) represents a function related to the hysteric component of Δc/c0. αAP is the intercept that depends, not on the instantaneous pump strain, but on the amplitude of the pump strain, AP (See, Eq. (1) hereof). αAP is found as the average of all of the measured values of Δc/c0. For the measured data set, αAP≈−1.1×10−3.
Reference will now be made in detail to the present embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. In the FIGURES, similar structure will be identified using identical reference characters. It will be understood that the FIGURES are for the purpose of describing particular embodiments of the invention and are not intended to limit the invention thereto. Turning now to
The nonlinear elastic parameters in Eq. 4 above depend on the change in acoustic wave speed as a function of formation strain. This change in wave speed as a function of strain is fit to a quadratic polynomial with the coefficients used to extract α, β, and δ. The details of the data analysis may be found in a paper by J. Riviere et al., Journal of Applied Physics 114, 054905 (2013). The area of the loops (hysteresis) as a function of strain, εp(max), can also be used, and is proportional to α.
Pore pressure in a formation as a function of confining pressure and nonlinear elastic parameters of the material is given by
where b is the Biot Coefficient (typically 0.4-0.9 in rock), K is the linear stiffness constant, ε is the strain, Δε is the strain amplitude, {dot over (ε)} denotes the partial derivative with respect to time, sign is a function returning the sign (positive or negative) of the argument, β and δ are combinations of third- and fourth-order elastic constants representing the acoustoelasticity (quadratic and cubic classical nonlinearity), and the parameter α relates to the strength of the hysteresis, according to the Preisach-Mayergoyz model of elasticity. See, e.g., K. R. McCall et al., “A new theoretical paradigm to describe hysteresis, discrete memory and nonlinear elastic wave propagation in rock,” Nonlin. Proc. Geophys. 3, 89-101 (1996), R. A. Guyer et al., “Quantitative implementation of Preisach-Mayergoyz space to find static and dynamic elastic moduli in rock,” J. Geophys. Res. 102(B3), 5281-5293 (1997), and G. Douglas Meegan, Jr. et al., “Observations Of Nonlinear Elastic Wave Behavior In Sandstone,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94, (1993) 3387-3391.
As described above, the parameters α, β, and δ may be obtained from plots of (Δc(εp)/c0 as a function of strain, εp. In what follows, Δc(εp)/c0 will be replaced by ΔC/C0, and εp will be replaced by ε. α is given by:
where C0 is the linear velocity and C the perturbed velocity. The second derivative of u with respect to t is the particle acceleration that is frequently measured, f is the wave fundamental frequency, and ε is the strain measured at frequency f in the focal region as the signal source amplitude is increase. Alternatively, alpha can be obtained from the third harmonic amplitude also when wave amplitudes are large. In the following alpha, beta and delta are shown.
where L is the wavelength of the fundamental frequency divided by two, equivalent to the radius of the focal region, the second derivative of u with respect to time, 3f, is the third harmonic acceleration amplitude, the second derivative of u with respect to time, 2f, is the second harmonic acceleration amplitude, the second derivative of u with respect to time, 1f, is the fundamental harmonic acceleration amplitude, and ω=2πf, where f is the fundamental frequency.
Time reversal is a method for focusing acoustic waves such that intense (non-damaging) sound amplitudes are generated in a volume to induce local nonlinearities. As an example, waves may be introduced into a borehole using a piezoelectric transceiver. The waves are recorded on another transceiver located elsewhere in the borehole. The recorded waves are then reversed in time, and emitted from the detecting transceivers, where they follow their forward wave paths backwards-in-space, and coalesce, focusing at the original source transceiver, since the elastic wave equation is symmetric with respect to time. That is, the wave equation may be evaluated either forward or backward in time, the physics being identical. Amplitudes at the time-reversed focus are large due to conservation of energy, since all of the energy contained in the long-duration scattered-signal is collapsed onto the focal point in space and time. Since wave amplitudes are largest at the focus, the local response may be nonlinear, but only at the focus.
When a laser vibrometer is used in the Doppler mode, particle velocity is directly measured, while in the interferometer mode, particle displacement is directly measured. When an accelerometer is used, the particle acceleration is directly measured. The pump strain ε is determined by dividing the measured dynamic particle velocity (v) by the wave speed (c) in the formation, that is, ε=v/c. the pump signal particle velocities at the sensor are oscillatory, the strain is also oscillatory. Thus, a strain waveform is obtained as a function of time. The times at which the probe pulses are generated are determined such that the strain is known at these times. Those strains are the values plotted on the x-axes, in the FIGURES described above.
Focusing occurs in the rock formation, even though generated within the casing of the borehole. The volume of the focus is determined by the frequency of the time reversed signal. Further, since the TR waves propagate and collapse through the propagation medium, onto the point of focus, the sensors detect the properties, nonlinear and otherwise, of the waves.
The probe signal is applied at a constant time spacing. The time it takes for the probe pulse to travel to the probe detector can be directly measured by knowing the timing and spacing of the probe emitter/detector pair. As the pump disturbs the formation, the probe signal may be advanced or retarded in time. This can be extracted by continually measuring the probe. Distances and materials do not change during the measurement, so a change in time can be directly related to a change in velocity. ΔC/C0 is measured from the timing relative to a reference signal as the probe pulse travels through the radius of the TR focus. Strain ε is measured by the particle velocity divided by the wave speed. Particle velocity is directly measured by the calibrated sensor at the focal point. Alternatively, the sensor measures particle acceleration and a correction made to generate the particle velocity. Note that the vibrometer measurements are non-contact, while accelerator measurements are contact measurements.
In accordance with the time-reversal process, acoustic signals from source, 36, are trained to focus into focal region, 38. Only one source is shown, but many sources may be used to increase the signal intensity, thereby increasing the strain applied to the formation. The phase relationships among the waves permit the constructive interference thereof resulting in space and time focusing effective for inducing a nonlinear strain in the formation 30 focal volume 38. As briefly mentioned above, if the sound velocity in formation 30 is known (as is generally the situation) using the relationship for the wavelength, λ=velocity/frequency, the diameter of the focal spot measured at the half maximum value is equal to one-half of the dominant wavelength. See, e.g., “Depth Profile Of A Time-Reversal Focus In An Elastic Solid,” by Marcel C. Remillieux et al., Ultrasonics 58 (2015) 60-66. Time Reversal Source support, 40, is adapted to fit in borehole 34 having an inner diameter of 6 in., as an example, and may be constructed of sturdy plastics capable of withstanding high temperatures and caustic environments.
In operation, the tool of
1. Lower the tool into a cased borehole;
2. Focus a chosen amplitude and frequency of ultrasonic energy through the borehole casing using time reversal or phased arrays as the HALF;
3. Record the time delay of the probe signal pulses, LAHF, focused in the same region as the HALF, as a function of the strain ε in the formation measured at the receiver in the bore hole;
4. Vary the source amplitude and frequency, and repeat measurements at the receiver;
5. Measure ΔC/C0 at the various source amplitudes and frequencies to determine α, β, and δ; and
6. Determine the pore pressure in the HALF region.
The foregoing description of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description and is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed, and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto.
The present application is a U.S. National Stage Application of International Application No. PCT/US2017/024203, filed on Mar. 26, 2017, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/411,717, for “Time-Reversed Nonlinear Acoustic Downhole Pore Pressure Measurements” by Harvey E. Goodman et al., which was filed on 24 Oct. 2016, the entire contents of which Patent Application is hereby specifically incorporated by reference herein for all that it discloses and teaches.
This invention was made with government support under Contract No. DE-AC52-06NA25396 awarded by the U.S. Department of Energy. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2017/024203 | 3/26/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/080583 | 5/3/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5343440 | Kan | Aug 1994 | A |
7310580 | Zhou | Dec 2007 | B2 |
8321133 | Hsu | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8522611 | Frumin | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8576661 | Johnson | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8995224 | Esmersoy | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9103928 | Gao | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9822634 | Gao | Nov 2017 | B2 |
10260300 | Dorovsky | Apr 2019 | B2 |
20020159332 | Thomann | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040184348 | Shook | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050041526 | Esmersoy | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20090105957 | Hsu | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20110141847 | Frumin | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120075951 | Johnson | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20140111209 | Gao | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150015413 | Gao | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20160299050 | Dorovsky | Oct 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2811426 | Apr 2012 | CA |
2622379 | Aug 2013 | EP |
3077615 | Oct 2016 | EP |
3529641 | Aug 2019 | EP |
2405205 | Feb 2005 | GB |
Entry |
---|
G. Renaud et al: “Hysteretic nonlinear evealed by dynamic acousto-elastic testing : Low Strain Hysteretic Anelasticity”, The 3rd EAA European Congress on Acoustics (Forum Acusticum 2002), vol. 40, No. 4, Feb. 28, 2013 (Feb. 28, 2013), pp. 715-719, XP055700499, Sevilla, Spain ISSN: 0094-8276, DOI: 18.1082/gr1.50150 * A long-term goal is to dentify the physical mechanisms responsible for the observed elastic nonlinear behaviors of Earth materials and to evaluate the influence of external static pressure and a saturating fluid. Another goal is to refine the data processing technique for in situ applications. Earth tides.; paragraph [0817] (5 pages). |
J. Riviere et al: “Pump and probe waves in dynamic acousto-elasticity: Comprehensive description and comparison with nonlinear elastic theories”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 114, No. 5, Aug. 7, 2813 (2813-88-87), p. 854985, P855788787, US ISSN: 8821-8979, DOI: 18.1863/1.4816395 * the whole document * (20 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190250295 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62411717 | Oct 2016 | US |