The present invention relates to a timepiece comprising a repeater mechanism and a special control mechanism.
Minute repetitions have been known since Breguet times in the eighteenth century. They are intended to indicate the current time on request with the aid of different chimes. In the book Théorie d'horlogerie by Reymondin, Monnier, Jeanneret, Pelaratti, pages 219-224, there is an illustration of one of the most well-known examples of such a repeater mechanism, which uses two gongs to strike usually in each case the hours, then where applicable the quarters, and finally the residual minutes. The releasing of the strike-mechanism is actuated by a so-called winding slider which first tensions the mainspring of the strike-mechanism by means of a rack which meshes with a pinion arranged on the strike-mechanism barrel cover. At the end of the travel of this slider, the movement of the strike-mechanism is released, wherein the cooperation between inter alia racks and rungs determines the current time relating to the end of the travel of the slider.
Therefore, in conventional clocks comprising a repeater mechanism, the releasing of the strike-mechanism is always linked to the tensioning of the modified dedicated strike-mechanism barrel, and multiple releasing of the repeats is not possible. The user friendliness of such a strike-mechanism is limited by the fact that the actuation force required in order to push the winding slider is quite high because what is actually being carried out is the winding of a barrel, which is usually done by a crown. The narrow shape of the slider may lead to the finger slipping, and thus may lead to incorrect operation.
No locking device is present to rule out a further releasing of the strike-mechanism while the latter is moving, which makes actuation thereof particularly tricky. Release locking devices exist for strike-mechanisms, but these must usually be actuated in advance manually, for example with the aid of a blocking lever, in order to achieve the so-called muting.
The object of the present invention is to overcome these disadvantages.
A possibility was sought to develop a timepiece with a minute repetition which, unlike the conventional and known timepieces having a repeater mechanism, allows multiple releasing of the strike-mechanism without the mainspring of the strike-mechanism having to be tensioned again prior to each releasing and which more efficiently rules out operating errors.
Proceeding from the preamble of claim 1, this object is achieved by the characterizing features of claim 1.
The described invention makes it possible to deactivate the release function of an actuating member automatically after a first actuation until the end of the movement of the strike-mechanism. An integrated release locking means is thus created by ensuring that a released movement of the strike-mechanism can no longer be disrupted by possible operating errors: no further releasing of the strike-mechanism can be carried out by the actuating member while the strike-mechanism is running.
However, a timepiece comprising a repeater mechanism and a control mechanism according to the invention can allow this strike-mechanism to strike multiple times in succession since the releasing thereof is linked to a release locking device but at the same time is now completely separate from the winding of a preferably dedicated strike-mechanism barrel. Therefore, the mainspring of the strike-mechanism has to be retensioned only after a certain number of repeater operations.
The mainspring of the strike-mechanism is tensioned via a different device, so that multiple releasing of the repeater is permitted, wherein the releasing can preferably be achieved, for haptic reasons, via a push-button instead of a slider. The winding may in contrast be carried out via a customary crown.
The releasing of the repeater via a push-button, as in the case of chronographs, is more advantageous for haptic reasons. The sliders used to date in the casing require a considerable step as a support for the finger during the tensioning of the mainspring. If this step is not shaped to be particularly large and to provide a sufficient grip, the finger may slip, leading to incorrect operation. The installation of a push-button in the casing of a timepiece is much easier and requires a much simpler casing design in comparison to a slider. The impermeability to water and dust is easier to achieve and to guarantee when using a push-button than when using a slider.
Since the tensioning of the barrel is separate from the releasing of the strike-mechanism, the actuation force for releasing is considerably lower and thus activation thereof becomes easier. At the same time, therefore, a different winding member, such a customary crown for example, can be used for winding the barrel, which is more suitable for this purpose than a slider.
It is thus not only the reliability and robustness of the control mechanism for the strike-mechanism that is improved, but also the user friendliness thereof.
According to the invention, the release locking means is embodied by a special release lever which is movable between a rest position and a working position and which is preferably actuated by a push-button. In its rest position, the release lever blocks the free movement of the barrel, and in its working position this movement is then enabled. By virtue of a tip attached to the release lever, the latter can be locked in its working position by a clamping handle so that, immediately after actuation of the push-button, operating errors due to undesired further actuations are ruled out, and at the same time the movement of the strike-mechanism is released.
In the context of a minute repetition, the minute rack, which is driven last by the strike-mechanism control mechanism, also comprises an unlocking face which cooperates with an adjusting eccentric to lift the clamping handle and thus enable the release lever to return to its rest position at the end of the strike-mechanism movement.
In a preferred embodiment, the release lever furthermore comprises a flexible element which is preferably formed in one piece with a main part and which, as it travels between its rest position and its working position, determines the precise time to be struck, in that it preferably drives in rotation a switching cam provided with catches so as to enable racks provided with hooks to fall onto their respective rung. This step then takes place independently of any step of winding the barrel, since the barrel is still blocked during this step.
In a preferred embodiment, the release lever furthermore comprises a pin for locking the barrel in a blocking position. This pin preferably cooperates with another pin which is preferably on a gear of a movement drive chain that is in power transmission with the barrel. The lock is thus of modular construction, without any changes to the barrel being required.
In a preferred embodiment, a sliding guide device provided with stop faces is furthermore provided for the release lever so that the path between its rest position and its working position can be reliably repeated.
In a preferred embodiment, two completely dedicated separate kinematic chains are formed on the one hand for the winding of the barrel between a winding member and the barrel and on the other hand between an actuating member for the releasing of the strike-mechanism and the barrel. The entire control mechanism is thus of completely modular construction, and for example a conventional barrel and a corresponding winding mechanism could be used for the strike-mechanism. Since customary or conventional components can be reused, the proposed repeater mechanism can thus be integrated more easily in a timepiece and the production costs are also reduced as a result.
In a preferred embodiment, the barrel used no longer needs to have any special parts either for the winding thereof or for determining the current time and actuating the strike-mechanism. Completely separate time-determining and run-programming devices are to this end also of modular design, and thus the same advantages are obtained in terms of compatibility, possibility for integration, and lowering of production costs. Since no additional elements have to be placed on top of one another on the barrel in comparison to conventional strike-mechanism barrels, less space is also taken up in the height direction on the workplate for holding the entire strike-mechanism module, so that a timepiece that is thinner overall can be produced.
Advantageous embodiments of the invention are described in the dependent claims and in the description below.
A preferred example of embodiment of the invention will be described below with reference to the appended figures, which concern a novel minute repetition and the most important parts of the releasing and release locking device, wherein in particular a release lever is shown in its respective rest position and working position in various sequences during the movement of the strike-mechanism, and separate releasing and winding drive chains are illustrated.
In the figures:
The following figures each show the structure of the control mechanism with separate winding and releasing devices and the order of operations after the releasing of the strike-mechanism, which bring this control mechanism into various states during the movement of the strike-mechanism.
The branching between the two winding chains takes place at winding pinion 11, which acts as an intermediate element both for the winding of the strike-mechanism and of the movement mechanism. As a variant to the solution described here, it would also be possible to tension the two mainsprings also by different directions of rotation on the winding shaft, by adding a freewheel mechanism on an intermediate gear, or to produce a structure with two separate winding shafts.
A completely separate movement device for the strike-mechanism barrel 4, which movement device is completely decoupled from this winding mechanism, is illustrated on the left-hand side of
As shown in
As shown in
When the release lever 12 is pushed in the first arrow direction “a” by the push-button 0, the pin 14 fastened to the release lever 12 moves out of the radial movement circle of the pin 15 and thus enables the free run of the strike-mechanism barrel 4. Such a modular arrangement of the unlocking device for the movement of this barrel—that is to say the strike-mechanism barrel 4—which involves exclusively elements outside of the barrel makes it possible to continue to work with conventional barrel structures which have no additional or modified parts. The proposed repeater mechanism can thus be more easily integrated in a timepiece.
In the preferred embodiment shown in
As soon as the release lever 12 has reached its maximum working position, it is held in this position by a clamping handle 16 which engages in a cutout behind a sticking tip 12.2. The proposed control mechanism thus offers an additional locking device, in which an integrated release locking means is ensured as soon as the push-button 0 has been actuated. The release lever 12 will remain in its working position until the end of the strike-mechanism run, even though the push-button 0 is preferably brought back into its rest position by a restoring spring and could thus be actuated again. However, such a further actuation would then no longer have any effect.
Before this, however, in this preferred embodiment, the inner toothing 23.2 of the third rack 23, and in actual fact the inner toothing of all racks, must move past the program gears without being blocked by the latter. Namely, the movement of the strike-mechanism barrel 4 in this middle position of the release lever 12 between the rest position and the working position is still blocked by the pins—that is to say the first pin 14 and the second pin 15—and, since the driven gear 5 is in the power transmission between the strike-mechanism barrel 4 and the second pin 15, this gear and thus all the program gears mounted thereon are also still blocked.
Before the release lever 12 has reached its maximum working position, the flexible element 12.1 again releases the switching finger 17.1 of the switching cam 17. The latter moves into its rest position counter to the third arrow direction “b”, that is to say in the fourth arrow direction “b”, on account of the restoring force of the illustrated switching cam spring 17.2.
As already explained with reference to
The three program gears mounted on the driven gear 5, that is to say the hour program gear 6, the quarter program gear 7 and the minute program gear 8, in their rotational movement in the sixth arrow direction “d”, that is to say the running direction of the strike-mechanism barrel, successively transport the first rack 21, the second rack 22 and finally the third rack 23 to their rest position, which they reach by using their hooks to lift their respective first catch 18, second catch 19 and third catch 20 and remain there.
As they travel to their rest position, the racks move their respectively associated first hammer lever 27, second hammer lever 28, third hammer lever 29 and fourth hammer lever 30, which in turn respectively allow the first hammer 31 and the second hammer 32 to strike the first gong 33 and the second gong 34. Such a configuration with two gongs is illustrated in
As shown in
The mechanism is thus back in the starting position, and the repeater can be triggered again if the push-button 0 is pressed.
In contrast to the repeaters known to date, which due to their design require the mainspring of the strike-mechanism to be tensioned again prior to each striking, the described invention makes it possible to allow a timepiece having a repeater mechanism to strike a number of times in succession. The mainspring of the strike-mechanism has to be tensioned again only after a certain number of repetition operations.
The proposed integrated release locking means prevents the repeater from being released a further time while it is already striking, which offers increased robustness and reliability, the modular structure of the release locking device making it possible to reuse customary parts of a timepiece movement (that is to say barrel and push-button) and thus to keep as low as possible the production costs and costs of integration in existing timepieces.
However, a person skilled in the art will understand from this description that the subject matter of the present invention encompasses other variants both for the release locking means and for the decoupling between the releasing device and the winding device, and is not only suitable for a minute repetition but rather can be used for all types of repeater strike-mechanism. In particular, it is possible to apply the described invention to all types of repeaters known in horology, such as, for example, quarter repetitions or minute repetitions. The blocking of the barrel could be achieved for example by the pivoting movement of a rocker which would come into engagement directly on the outer run toothing of the barrel or another gear, instead of by the cooperation between pins; conversely, the locking of the release lever in its working position could involve a pin instead of a tip. The unlocking device, which is intended to allow the return of the release lever at the end of the movement of the strike-mechanism, also need not necessary take the form of an adjusting eccentric and an unlocking face arranged on a minute rack, but rather could be coupled in general to the control member actuated last, so that this unlocking takes place only once all chimes have been struck.
For haptic reasons, the releasing of the repeater via a customary push-button (as in the case of chronographs) is more advantageous than the previously used sliders, but other actuating members, such as for example a bezel which then should be turned instead of pushed, would also be conceivable in the context of the invention. The same consideration applies to the winding member, which need not necessarily take the form of a customary crown but rather could also be formed for example by another push-button, wherein the sliding movement of the push-button will then later be converted in a driven chain into a rotational movement.
The detailed preferred embodiment mentioned above therefore serves only as an example and should not be construed as limiting in respect of the interpretation of the claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
15159705 | Mar 2015 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3440816 | Jaccard | Apr 1969 | A |
4508456 | Hepfer | Apr 1985 | A |
7021819 | Schmiedchen | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7065005 | Rochat | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7192181 | Schmiedchen | Mar 2007 | B2 |
20070242568 | Goeller | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20120230165 | Goeller | Sep 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
61476 | Oct 1913 | CH |
684 455 | Sep 1994 | CH |
1 845 425 | Oct 2007 | EP |
2 498 148 | Sep 2012 | EP |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report issued Oct. 29, 2015 in European Application 15159705, filed on Mar. 18, 2015 (with English Translation). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160274548 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |