This application claims priority to European Patent Application No. 18197529.3 filed on Sep. 28, 2018, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention concerns a timepiece including a mechanical movement, provided with a mechanical oscillator which is formed by a balance and a balance spring, and an electronic control device for controlling the frequency of the mechanical oscillator which controls the operation of the mechanical movement.
In particular, the electronic control device includes an auxiliary oscillator of the electronic type, which is generally more precise than a mechanical oscillator, in particular a quartz oscillator
Several documents concern the electronic control of a mechanical oscillator in a timepiece. In particular, US Patent Application No 2013/0051191 concerns a timepiece including a balance/balance spring and an electronic circuit for controlling the oscillation frequency of this balance/balance spring. The balance spring is formed of a piezoelectric material or includes two lateral layers of piezoelectric material on a silicon core, two external lateral electrodes being arranged on the lateral surfaces of the balance spring. These two electrodes are connected to the electronic control circuit which includes a plurality of switchable capacitances arranged in parallel and connected to the two electrodes of the balance spring.
With reference to
Further, after the switchable capacitor circuit there is arranged a full-wave rectifier circuit 46 conventionally formed of a four-diode bridge, which provides a continuous voltage VDC and loads a storage capacitor 48. This electrical energy provided by the piezoelectric balance spring powers device 32. This is thus an autonomous electrical system, since it is self-powered in the sense that the electrical energy comes from the mechanical energy provided to mechanical resonator 2, whose piezoelectric balance spring 8, forms an electromechanical transducer (an electrical current generator) when the mechanical resonator oscillates.
As indicated in US Patent No 2013/0051191 at paragraph 0052, electronic control circuit 24 can only reduce the oscillation frequency of mechanical resonator 2 by increasing the value of variable capacitance CV. This observation is confirmed by the graph of
It is an object of the present invention to propose a timepiece, provided with a mechanical resonator, comprising a balance spring at least partially formed of a piezoelectric material, and an electronic control system associated with the piezoelectric balance spring, which does not have the drawbacks of the aforementioned prior art timepiece, in particular, which can be associated with a mechanical movement whose functioning is initially set in an optimal manner, i.e. to the best of its abilities. Thus, it is an object of the invention to provide an electronic control system, which, owing to the use of a piezoelectric balance spring, is discrete and autonomous and which is genuinely complementary to the mechanical movement, since it increases its precision without thereby degrading an optimal initial setting of the mechanical movement.
To this end the invention concerns a timepiece including a control device arranged to be capable of regulating the mean frequency of the mechanical oscillator, formed by a balance and a balance spring, which times the running of the timepiece, this control device including an auxiliary time base, formed by an auxiliary electronic oscillator, which provides a reference frequency signal for the control process. The balance spring is at least partially formed by a piezoelectric material and by at least two electrodes arranged to have between them a voltage induced by the piezoelectric material undergoing mechanical stress and electrically connected to the control device which is arranged to be capable of varying the impedance of the control system formed by the piezoelectric material, the at least two electrodes and the control device. The control device is arranged to be capable of momentarily varying the electrical resistance produced by the control device between the at least two electrodes, in order to generate, at least at times, control pulses which are distinct and each have a certain duration TP, each control pulse consisting of a momentary decrease in said electrical resistance relative to a nominal electrical resistance, which is generated by the control device between the two electrodes outside the distinct control pulses. The control device is arranged to be capable of applying a plurality of control pulses during each of said times, such that any two successive control pulses among each plurality of control pulses have, between the starts thereof, a temporal distance DT equal to a number N multiplied by half a determined control period Treg for each of said times, that is to say a mathematical relation DT=N·Treg/2, where N is a positive integer number greater than zero. Control period Treg and number N are selected to allow synchronization of the mechanical oscillator at a control frequency Freg=1/Treg during each of said times. The control device is arranged to determine, by means of the reference time base, the start of each of the control pulses, in order to satisfy the aforementioned mathematical relation between the temporal distance and the control period, and thus to determine the control frequency.
According to an advantageous variant, temporal distance DT is equal to an odd number 2M−1 multiplied by half a determined control period Treg for each of said times, that is to say a mathematical relation DT=(2M−1)·Treg/2, where M is a positive integer number greater than zero. Control period Treg and number M are selected to allow synchronization of the mechanical oscillator at a control frequency Freg=1/Treg during each of said times.
In a first main embodiment, said times are contiguous and together form a continuous time window. The control device is arranged to apply the control pulses during the continuous time window, such that any two successive control pulses occurring in this continuous time window have, between the starts thereof, the temporal distance DT where control period Treg is equal to a desired period T0c, which is the inverse of the desired frequency F0c, in order to continually synchronize, after any initial transitory phase, the frequency of the mechanical oscillator at a desired frequency F0c during the continuous time window.
In a particular variant, during the continuous time window, the control device is arranged to periodically apply the control pulses with a trigger frequency FD (N)=2·F0c/N in the general variant set out above, respectively FD (M)=2·F0c/(2M−1) in the advantageous variant also mentioned above. In a preferred variant, the number N, respectively M is constant and predefined for the continuous time window.
According to a second main embodiment, the timepiece further includes a device for measuring a temporal drift in operation of the mechanical oscillator relative to its desired frequency F0c, and the control device is arranged to select, prior to each of said times, for control period Treg, depending on whether at least a certain positive or negative temporal drift is detected, respectively a first correction period Tcor1 which is greater than a desired period T0c, equal to the inverse of the desired frequency, or a second correction period Tcor2 which is less than the desired period. Each of said times is provided with sufficient duration to establish a synchronous phase in which the frequency of the mechanical oscillator is synchronized either at a first correction frequency Fcor1=1/Tcor1 when said at least one certain positive temporal drift is detected prior to the time concerned, or at a second correction frequency Fcor2=1/Tcor2 when said at least one certain negative temporal drift is detected prior to the time concerned.
According to a preferred variant, when said at least one certain positive or negative temporal drift is detected, the control device is arranged to periodically apply, during the next time of said times, the corresponding plurality of control pulses respectively with a first frequency FINF, according to the aforementioned variant FINF=2·Fcor1/N or FINF=2·Fcor1/(2M−1), or with a second frequency FSUP, according to the aforementioned variant FSUP=2·Fcor2/N or FSUP=2·Fcor2/(2M−1). In particular, the number N, respectively M, is constant during each of said times and it is either predetermined or determined prior to the next time concerned.
As a result of the features of the timepiece according to the invention, it is thus possible to correct both a time gain and a time loss in the natural running/operation of a mechanical movement by acting through control pulses, each having a limited duration, which vary the resistance between the at least two electrodes of the balance spring which is at least partially formed of a piezoelectric material.
In the first main embodiment, the distinct control pulses are applied without interruption and the times at which they are triggered are determined such that the frequency of the mechanical oscillator is permanently synchronized at a desired frequency, so that there is no temporal drift after an initial phase, allowing the desired synchronization to be obtained. This first embodiment is very advantageous due to the simplicity of its electronic circuit.
In the second main embodiment, advantage is taken of the fact that the control system generates an induced voltage between the two electrodes of the balance spring, which makes it easy to count the vibrations or periods of the mechanical oscillator and therefore to detect a temporal drift in operation of the timepiece. In this case, control pulses are applied only at separate times and only when a certain temporal drift is detected, in a differentiated manner depending on whether this temporal drift is positive or negative, to correct the temporal drift.
The invention will be described in more detail below with reference to the annexed drawings, given by way of non-limiting example, in which:
The timepiece according to the invention comprises, like the prior art timepiece described above, a mechanical timepiece movement provided with a mechanical oscillator, formed by a balance and a piezoelectric balance spring, for example as represented in
According to the invention, the control device is arranged to be capable of momentarily varying the electrical resistance generated by the control device between the two electrodes of the balance spring, in order to generate, at least at times, control pulses which are distinct and each have a certain duration TP, each control pulse consisting of a momentary decrease in the electrical resistance of the control system, namely the aforementioned electrical resistance relative to a nominal electrical resistance, which is generated by the control device between the two electrodes outside the control pulses. Generally, the control device is arranged to be capable of applying, at least at times, a plurality of control pulses during each of these times, such that any two successive control pulses among each plurality of control pulses have, between the starts thereof, a temporal distance DT equal to a number N multiplied by half a determined control period Treg for each of said times, that is to say a mathematical relation DT=N·Treg/2, where N is a positive integer number greater than zero. Control period Treg and number N are selected to allow synchronization of the mechanical oscillator at a control frequency Freg=1/Treg during each of said times, as will be explained in detail below. The control device is arranged to determine, by means of the reference time base, the start of each of said control pulses, in order to satisfy the aforementioned mathematical relation between the temporal distance DT and the control period Treg, and thus to determine the control frequency.
In an advantageous variant, temporal distance DT is equal to an odd number 2M−1 multiplied by half a determined control period Treg for each of said times, that is to say a mathematical relation DT=(2M−1)·Treg/2, where M is a positive integer number greater than zero. This variant, which selects odd numbers among the possible values for the aforementioned number N in the general variant set out above, is advantageous, since, according to observations made by the inventors, selecting an odd number results in greater control efficiency compared to the use of an even number for number N.
Preferably, during each time in which a plurality of control pulses occurs, the control device is arranged to periodically apply the control pulses with a trigger frequency FD (N)=2·Freg/N for the general variant, and FD (M)=2·Freg/(2M−1) for the aforementioned advantageous variant.
In the context of the development that led to the present invention, the inventors brought to light an entirely remarkable physical phenomenon in relation to a mechanical oscillator formed by a balance and a piezoelectric balance spring; this physical phenomenon makes it possible, according to the invention, to regulate the mean frequency of a mechanical oscillator incorporated in a mechanical movement by means of an electronic control device, as set out above. Next, the inventors defined two types of control based on this physical phenomenon, which are respectively implemented in two main embodiments which will be described in detail below. To explain this physical phenomenon,
In the example represented in
Remarkably, the same synchronization frequencies were obtained for short-circuit pulse trigger frequencies respectively equal to the aforementioned trigger frequencies FDX, X=1 to 5, divided by an odd number 2M−1, where M is a positive integer number greater than zero, insofar as the ratio between the synchronization frequency and the natural frequency of the mechanical oscillator/the desired frequency is comprised between (K−1)/K and (K+1)/K where K>40·(2M−1). Similar results were obtained with division by an even number 2M and a similar condition between K and M, but it appears, a priori, that in this latter case, synchronization is not established as efficiently as for an odd number, as the effect of the short-circuit pulses is less.
From the preceding observations and considerations, we conclude that it is possible to synchronize a mechanical oscillator having a piezoelectric balance spring, as described above, by periodically applying short-circuit pulses between the two electrodes of this balance spring, at a frequency close to its natural frequency but different therefrom.
Thus, if the natural frequency deviates from the desired frequency in the usual way, i.e. from one second to around fifteen seconds per day, it is easy, by fully open loop control, to synchronize the frequency of the mechanical oscillator at the desired frequency by continually applying distinct control pulses as described above with a suitably selected trigger frequency. This application is the subject of the first main embodiment. By using the voltage induced between the balance spring electrodes when the mechanical resonator oscillates, it is easy to count the oscillation periods and to determine a temporal drift, in particular to detect when a certain positive or negative temporal drift is reached, and then, during a certain correction time, a plurality of distinct control pulses can be applied as described above, with a suitably selected trigger frequency to synchronize the oscillation of the mechanical oscillator at a different correction frequency from the desired frequency but selected to be sufficiently close to this desired frequency to allow synchronization, and thus to correct the detected temporal drift. This application, which can be considered a semi-open or semi-closed loop, is the subject of the second main embodiment.
Piezoelectric balance spring 8 is at least partially formed by a piezoelectric material and by at least two electrodes 20, 22 (see
Control signal Scom is a reference signal having, in a general variant, a trigger frequency FD (N)=2·F0c/N, where number N is an integer number greater than zero which is selected such that, for a ratio between a maximum drift frequency in the functioning of the mechanical oscillator and the desired frequency F0c comprised between (K−1)/K and (K+1)/K, this number N is less than K/40, i.e. N<K/40. In an advantageous variant, control signal Scom is a frequency signal which has a trigger frequency FD (M)=2·F0c/(2M−1), the number M being an integer number greater than zero, which is selected such that, for a ratio between a maximum drift frequency in the functioning of the mechanical oscillator and the desired frequency comprised between (K−1)/K and (K+1)/K, 2M−1 is less than K/40, i.e. 2M−1<K/40. Preferably, numbers N and M are constant and predefined for the continuous time window during which the short-circuit pulses, which define the control pulses, are applied.
At each pulse of the control signal, timer 58 closes switch 60 (the switch is on and therefore conductive) during a time interval TR, such that the short-circuit pulses each have a duration TR, which is preferably less than quarter the desired period T0c. In an advantageous variant, the duration of the control pulses is less than or substantially equal to one tenth of the desired period T0c. Thus, during the aforementioned time window, after any transitory phase during activation of the control device, continuous synchronization of the frequency of the mechanical oscillator at the desired frequency F0c is obtained.
The electronic control circuit includes a device for measuring for any temporal drift in the running/operation of the timepiece movement compared to a desired frequency for the mechanical oscillator, which is determined by the auxiliary time base 42, 44. The measuring device is formed by a hysteresis comparator 54 whose two inputs are connected to the two electrodes 20, 22 of piezoelectric balance spring 8. It will be noted that in the example shown, electrode 20 is electrically connected to an input of comparator 54 via the mass of the control device. The hysteresis comparator supplies a digital signal ‘Comp’ (see
Signal ‘Comp’ is provided to a first input ‘Up’ of a two-directional counter CB forming the measuring device. The two-directional counter is thus incremented by one unit at each oscillation period of the mechanical oscillator (particularly on each rising edge of the signal). It thus continuously receives a measurement of the instantaneous oscillation frequency of the mechanical oscillator. The two-directional counter receives at its second input ‘Down’ a clock signal Shor provided by the frequency divider DIV1 & DIV2, this clock signal corresponding to a desired frequency F0c for the mechanical oscillator which is determined by the auxiliary oscillator of the auxiliary time base. Thus, the two-directional counter provides to control logic circuit 56 a signal SDT corresponding to a cumulative error over time between the oscillation frequency of the mechanical oscillator and the desired frequency, this cumulative error defining the temporal drift of the mechanical oscillator relative to the auxiliary oscillator.
Next, control device 62 includes a switch 60 formed by a transistor and arranged between the two electrodes 20, 22 of balance spring 8, this switch being controlled by control logic circuit 56, which is arranged to be capable of momentarily closing the switch, via a timer 58, so that it is on/conductive during the control pulses, which then define short-circuit pulses. The control circuit selectively provides a control signal Scom to timer 58 which, in response to this control signal, momentarily closes transistor 60 by applying a signal SCC thereto. More precisely, the control circuit determines the start time of each short-circuit pulse by starting or resetting the timer (‘Timer’) which immediately turns on/makes transistor 60 conductive (switch closed), with the timer determining the duration TR of each short circuit pulse. At the end of each short-circuit pulse, the timer opens the switch again so that transistor 60 is off, i.e. it becomes non-conductive again. In a general variant, the control pulses each have a duration less than a quarter of the desired period T0c which is equal to the inverse of said desired frequency of the mechanical oscillator. In a preferred variant, the duration of the control pulses is less than or substantially equal to one tenth of a desired period.
Electronic circuit 62a further includes a power circuit 66 for the control device, which was described above.
The control method according to the second main embodiment, performed by control device 62 and implemented in control logic circuit 56, is explained below. The control logic circuit is arranged to be capable of determining whether a temporal drift measured by the measuring device corresponds to at least a certain gain (CB>N1) or to at least a certain loss (CB<−N2), where N1 and N2 are positive integer numbers. The control device, in particular its control logic circuit, is arranged to select, prior to each distinct correction time provided, for control period Treg as defined above, depending on whether at least a certain positive or negative temporal drift is detected, respectively a first correction period Tcor1 which is greater than desired period T0c, or a second correction period Tcor2 which is less than the desired period, each of the correction times being provided with sufficient duration to establish a synchronous phase in which the frequency of the mechanical oscillator is synchronized either at a first correction frequency Fcor1=1/Tcor1 when said at least one certain positive temporal drift is detected prior to the time concerned, or at a second correction frequency Fcor2=1/Tcor2 when said at least one certain negative temporal drift is detected prior to the time concerned, in order to correct the detected temporal drift.
In an advantageous variant, control logic circuit 56 is arranged such that the temporal distance DT between two short-circuit pulses in each distinct correction time, is equal to an odd number 2M−1 multiplied by half the determined control period Treg for each of said correction times, that is to say a mathematical relation DT=(2M−1)·Treg/2, where M is a positive integer number greater than zero, control period Treg and number M being selected to allow synchronization of the mechanical oscillator at a control frequency Freg=1/Treg during each of the correction times.
In a particular variant, when said at least one certain positive or negative temporal drift is detected by control logic circuit 56, control device 62 is arranged to periodically apply, during the next correction time, a corresponding plurality of control pulses with respectively a first trigger frequency FIN=2·Fcor1/N or a second trigger frequency FSUP=2·Fcor2/N. The number N is preferably constant during each correction time and it is either predetermined or determined prior to the next correction time concerned.
In order to ensure the desired synchronization during each of the correction times, it is advantageously provided that, for each of the correction times in which first trigger frequency FINF occurs, the latter is higher than a first limit frequency FL1 (N, K)=[(K−1)/K]·2·F0c/N where K>40·N, and for each of the correction times where the second trigger frequency occurs, the latter is lower than a second limit frequency FL2 (N, K)=[(K+1)/K]·2·F0c/N where K>40·N.
In a specific variant, integer number N is lower in an initial phase than in a final phase of each of the correction times, in order to best reduce the initial transitory phase.
In a preferred variant, when said at least one certain positive or negative temporal drift is detected by control logic circuit 56, control device 62 is arranged to periodically apply, during the next correction time, a corresponding plurality of control pulses with respectively a first trigger frequency FIN=2·Fcor1/(2M−1) or a second trigger frequency FSUP=2·Fcor2/(2M−1). In particular, number M is constant during each correction time and it is either predetermined or determined prior to the next correction time concerned.
In order to ensure the desired synchronization during each of the correction times, it is advantageously provided that, for each of the correction times in which first trigger frequency FINF occurs, the latter is higher than a first limit frequency FL1 (M, K)=[(K−1)/K]·2·F0c/(2M−1) where K>40·(2M−1) and for each of the correction times where the second trigger frequency FSUP occurs, the latter is lower than a second limit frequency FL2 (M, K)=[(K+1)/K]·2·F0c/(2M−1) where K>40·(2M−1).
In a specific variant, in order to best reduce the initial transitory phase in each correction time, it is provided that the start of a first control pulse, among the plurality of control pulses provided for the correction time concerned, is determined relative to the angular position of the mechanical oscillator. To this end, signal ‘Comp’ is also provided to control logic circuit 56. In this specific variant, the first control pulse is triggered by a rising edge or falling edge of signal ‘Comp’.
Referring to
In the particular variant represented in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
18197529 | Sep 2018 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3781955 | Lavrinenko | Jan 1974 | A |
10969745 | Haemmerli | Apr 2021 | B2 |
20050073913 | Born | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20130051191 | Schafroth | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130107677 | Willemin | May 2013 | A1 |
20150234352 | Hessler et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20190286063 | Nagy | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20200103827 | Tombez | Apr 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
697 207 | Jun 2008 | CH |
705 679 | Apr 2013 | CH |
101878454 | Nov 2010 | CN |
103092057 | May 2013 | CN |
104849994 | Aug 2015 | CN |
104850000 | Aug 2015 | CN |
106104393 | Nov 2016 | CN |
10 2009 005 357 | Aug 2010 | DE |
1 164 441 | Dec 2001 | EP |
1 605 323 | Dec 2005 | EP |
2 224 293 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2 908 187 | Aug 2015 | EP |
2002-228774 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2004-69980 | Mar 2004 | JP |
WO 2011066362 | Jun 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Japanese Office Action dated Nov. 10, 2020 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-171186 (with English translation), 6 pages. |
Combined Chinese Office Action and Search Report dated Feb. 1, 2021 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201910924692.1, 7 pages. |
European Search Report dated Apr. 9, 2019 in European Application No. 18197529.3, filed Sep. 28, 2018 (with English Translation of Categories of Cited Documents). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200103826 A1 | Apr 2020 | US |