1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to electronics and, more specifically but not exclusively, to clock and data recovery (CDR) circuits.
2. Description of the Related Art
This section introduces aspects that may help facilitate a better understanding of the invention. Accordingly, the statements of this section are to be read in this light and are not to be understood as admissions about what is prior art or what is not prior art.
In a digital communication system in which symbols representing modulated, encoded user data are transmitted as an analog signal from a transmitter to a receiver, the receiver may have clock-and-data recovery (CDR) circuitry that (i) derives a recovered clock signal from level transitions in the received analog signal and (ii) uses the recovered clock signal to sample the analog signal to generate a sampled binary data signal that is then demodulated and decoded to recover the original user data.
In order to accurately recover the original user data, it is important to sample the analog signal near the middle of the unit intervals (UIs) corresponding to the bits represented in the analog signal to avoid ambiguities associated with sampling the analog signal near the signal level transitions. This desired sampling is achieved by controlling the phase of the recovered clock signal relative to the analog signal.
Conventional CDR circuits have phase-adjustment circuitry that accurately controls the phase of the recovered clock signal after the phase has been initially set near the middle of the unit intervals. However, if the initial phase is not set sufficiently near the middle of the unit intervals, then the phase-adjustment circuitry might not function as desired.
Other embodiments of the invention will become more fully apparent from the following detailed description, the appended claims, and the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals identify similar or identical elements.
Receiver 106 has two modes of operation: an on-line mode and an initialization mode. As described more fully below, in the on-line mode, the CDR circuitry of receiver 106 generates and adjusts the timing (e.g., phase) of a recovered clock signal that is used as clock signal CLK, while, in the initialization mode, the clock signal CLK is not generated and adjusted using the CDR circuitry of receiver 106.
In particular, analog front end 202 applies conventional, analog signal processing such as automatic gain control and equalization to received analog signal 103. Analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 206 samples the resulting processed analog signal 205 based on the timing of clock signal CLK to generate multi-bit digital signal 207. In particular, clock signal CLK controls the opening and closing of switch 204. In one implementation, switch 204 closes at every rising edge of clock signal CLK and opens again at every falling edge of clock signal CLK. As such, ADC 206 generates one multi-bit sample of digital signal 207 for each cycle of clock signal CLK.
Feed-forward equalizer (FFE) 208 equalizes digital signal 207 to generate multi-bit equalized digital signal 209. In order to correct for inter-symbol interference (ISI) in equalized digital signal 209, difference node 210 subtracts the equalized digital signal 215 generated by decision-feedback equalizer (DFE) 214 from equalized digital signal 209 to generate multi-bit digital signal 211. Slicer 212 slices (i.e., thresholds) digital signal 211 to generate binary data signal 213, which is provided to downstream receiver circuitry (not shown) for additional processing, such as demodulation and decoding, to recover the original user data signal.
In addition to a copy of binary data signal 213 being provided to DFE 214, another copy of binary data signal 213 is also provided to mixer (e.g., multiplier) 218, which multiplies binary data signal 213 by an appropriate target signal 217. The resulting mixed signal 219 is subtracted from a copy of multi-bit digital signal 211 at difference node 220 to generate error signal 221. Among other possible uses and although not shown in
In the initialization mode of operation, the receiver's CDR circuitry is disabled, such that clock signal CLK is not automatically adjusted. Instead, the phase of clock signal CLK remains constant until explicitly controlled to change.
According to one implementation, when receiver 106 is powered up (or reset), the receiver will begin operations in its initialization mode. One purpose of the initialization mode is to determine an initial phase to use for the clock signal CLK when the mode of operation transitions from the initialization node to the on-line mode.
When receiver 106 is powered up, the clock signal CLK used to control the sampling of ADC 206 will typically not be in phase with the center of the unit intervals in analog signal 205. In general, the clock signal CLK can have any random phase relationship with analog signal 205.
One possible technique for performing step 404 to generate the absolute ADC sample sum data, such as those represented in
Another possible technique for performing step 404 would be to provide a number (e.g., 16) of different ADC circuits, each of which is configured to sample analog signal 205 at a different clock phase, such that the sum data for the different clock phases can all be generated in parallel.
Yet another possible technique for performing step 404 would be to drive ADC 206 using a clock signal that is a number (e.g., 16) of times faster than the recovered clock signal used during on-line CDR processing. The different sum values for the different clock phases could then be generated in parallel by summing the corresponding samples for different UIs.
Note that two or more of these different techniques could be combined into a single hybrid technique.
Each of the possible techniques described above for implementing step 404 assumes that the optimal sampling phase does not vary over the time that it takes to perform step 404. In a real-world system, however, frequency offset and/or periodic jitter could cause the optimal sampling phase to drift with time. The impact of such timing drift can be accounted for by choosing an appropriate window size over which to sum the absolute ADC samples, such that the optimal sampling phase stays sufficiently constant over that window. The selection of the window size is typically based on a trade-off between (i) the desire to pick a smaller window to reduce the adverse effects of timing drift and (ii) the desire to pick a larger window to accumulate a larger number of samples at each different sampling phase to improve the statistical validity of the results.
Independent of the exact technique used to implement step 404, the method of
Embodiments of the invention may be implemented as (analog, digital, or a hybrid of both analog and digital) circuit-based processes, including possible implementation as a single integrated circuit (such as an ASIC or an FPGA), a multi-chip module, a single card, or a multi-card circuit pack. As would be apparent to one skilled in the art, various functions of circuit elements may also be implemented as processing blocks in a software program. Such software may be employed in, for example, a digital signal processor, micro-controller, general-purpose computer, or other processor.
Signals and corresponding nodes or ports may be referred to by the same name and are interchangeable for purposes here.
It should be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that any block diagrams herein represent conceptual views of illustrative circuitry embodying the principles of the invention. Similarly, it will be appreciated that any flow charts, flow diagrams, state transition diagrams, pseudo code, and the like represent various processes which may be substantially represented in computer readable medium and so executed by a computer or processor, whether or not such computer or processor is explicitly shown.
Unless explicitly stated otherwise, each numerical value and range should be interpreted as being approximate as if the word “about” or “approximately” preceded the value of the value or range.
It will be further understood that various changes in the details, materials, and arrangements of the parts which have been described and illustrated in order to explain embodiments of this invention may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from embodiments of the invention encompassed by the following claims.
The use of figure numbers and/or figure reference labels in the claims is intended to identify one or more possible embodiments of the claimed subject matter in order to facilitate the interpretation of the claims. Such use is not to be construed as necessarily limiting the scope of those claims to the embodiments shown in the corresponding figures.
It should be understood that the steps of the exemplary methods set forth herein are not necessarily required to be performed in the order described, and the order of the steps of such methods should be understood to be merely exemplary. Likewise, additional steps may be included in such methods, and certain steps may be omitted or combined, in methods consistent with various embodiments of the invention.
Although the elements in the following method claims, if any, are recited in a particular sequence with corresponding labeling, unless the claim recitations otherwise imply a particular sequence for implementing some or all of those elements, those elements are not necessarily intended to be limited to being implemented in that particular sequence.
Reference herein to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment can be included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments necessarily mutually exclusive of other embodiments. The same applies to the term “implementation.”
The embodiments covered by the claims in this application are limited to embodiments that (1) are enabled by this specification and (2) correspond to statutory subject matter. Non-enabled embodiments and embodiments that correspond to non-statutory subject matter are explicitly disclaimed even if they fall within the scope of the claims.
This application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. provisional application No. 61/766,839, filed on Feb. 20, 2013, the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3978407 | Forney et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
5481304 | Park et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5568465 | Hutchins et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5870591 | Sawada | Feb 1999 | A |
5940136 | Abe | Aug 1999 | A |
5990968 | Naka et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6081565 | Marandi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6115075 | Yoneno | Sep 2000 | A |
6266799 | Lee et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6291962 | Ogura et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304296 | Yoneno | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6323910 | Clark, III | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6377416 | Kikuta | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6404422 | Choi | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6456677 | Hiramatsu et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6462726 | Hamada | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6501452 | Weng et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6556637 | Moriuchi | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6671112 | Murakami et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6686969 | Hara et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6900676 | Tamura | May 2005 | B1 |
6924796 | Someya et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7085333 | Jeffers et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7339872 | Ogura | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7388908 | Dowling | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7573348 | Bauernfeind et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7746969 | Bryan | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7813065 | Annampedu et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7889825 | Tsai | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8073091 | Yamashita | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8139630 | Agazzi | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8174949 | Ratnakar Aravind | May 2012 | B2 |
8237597 | Liu et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8299948 | Shibasaki et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8310595 | Buttimer et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8363683 | Agazzi et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8411383 | Cao et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8411385 | Annampedu | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8525771 | Kawana et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8526131 | Annampedu et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8615062 | Chmelar | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8664983 | Soh | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8669891 | Xia et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8670512 | Wang | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8953950 | Nazarathy et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
20020021519 | Rae | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020080898 | Agazzi et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020172304 | Saze et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030079161 | Verboom | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040090413 | Yoo | May 2004 | A1 |
20040202266 | Gregorius et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050068650 | Annampedu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050135470 | Momtaz | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060155816 | Umei et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060197692 | Gong et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060256849 | Tseng et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070002990 | Lee et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070047683 | Okamura et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070110199 | Momtaz et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070146014 | Cheung | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070230640 | Bryan et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070237276 | Tsai | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080001797 | Aziz et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080048897 | Parthasarthy et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080225990 | Beukema et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090074126 | Song | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090196389 | Yamashita | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090207957 | Fukuda et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090220029 | Yamaguchi et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090310665 | Agazzi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100014573 | Momtaz et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100040182 | Yang et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100061488 | Endres et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100061497 | Buchmann et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100118426 | Vikramaditya et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100127906 | Yamaguchi et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100135378 | Lin et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100149940 | Nakata et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100201874 | Kawana et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100310024 | Agazzi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110019091 | Chiang et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110074483 | Wang et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110304768 | Chen et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120244824 | Entezari et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130049831 | Nedachi | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130202064 | Chmelar | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130207708 | Agrawal et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130214829 | Talwalkar et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130287154 | Tomita | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140098843 | Kong et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
J.D.H. Alexander, “Clock Recovery from Random Binary Data,” Electronics Letters, vol. 11, No. 22, Oct. 30, 1975, pp. 541-542. |
Kurt H. Mueller et al., “Timing Recovery in Digital Synchronous Data Receivers,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. Com-24, No. 5, May 1976, pp. 516-531. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140241478 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61766839 | Feb 2013 | US |