The present disclosure is directed to an airfoil for a gas turbine engine and more particularly to a tip structure configured for controlled over-tip flow and effective tip cooling.
Gas turbine engines include a compressor, combustor and turbine in flow series along a common shaft. Compressed air from the compressor is mixed with fuel in the combustor to generate hot combustion gases that rotate the turbine blades and drive the compressor. Flow leakage over the tips of the airfoils may result in reduced aerodynamic performance and high heat transfer. Consequently, there is significant interest in developing improved tip geometries that minimize over-tip loss while maintaining or improving tip heat transfer.
A tip structure for a turbine blade that allows improved control of over-tip flow is described herein. The tip structure includes a tip surface of an airfoil that extends from a leading edge to a trailing edge and from a pressure side to a suction side of the airfoil. A suction side rail protrudes from the tip surface and comprises: a trailing portion extending flush with the suction side of the airfoil from an origination location at or near the trailing edge to an intermediate location on the suction side; and a leading portion extending from the intermediate location across the tip surface so as to create a suction side shelf region between the leading portion of the suction side rail and the suction side of the airfoil. A pressure side rail protrudes from the tip surface and comprises: a trailing segment extending flush with the pressure side of the airfoil from an origination location at or near the trailing edge to a middle location on the pressure side; and a leading segment extending from the middle location across a camber line on the tip surface so as to create a pressure side shelf region between the leading segment of the pressure side rail and the pressure side of the airfoil.
Described in this disclosure is a tip structure for a turbine blade that includes pressure and suction side rails configured to maximize aerodynamic efficiency and/or minimize heat transfer on the tip surface.
Referring first to
The trailing portion 114b of the suction side rail 114 extends along the tip surface 104 flush with the suction side 112 of the airfoil from an origination location at or near the trailing edge 108 to an intermediate location 116 on the suction side 112 of the airfoil 100. The intermediate location 116 may be understood to be a low pressure region at or near the throat of the airfoil 100. At the intermediate location 116, the leading portion 114a of the suction side rail 114 crosses over the tip surface 104 and defines a suction side shelf 118 between the suction side rail 114 (more specifically, between the leading portion 114a thereof) and the suction side 112 of the airfoil 100. In other words, in contrast to the trailing portion 114b, which is flush with the suction side 112 of the airfoil 100, the leading portion 114a of the suction side rail 114 is recessed from the suction side 112 of the airfoil 100 so as to form the suction side shelf 118. The suction side shelf 118 may allow for the development of a stream-wise vortex (which may be referred to as a shelf vortex) that may act as an over-tip flow restrictor. The shelf vortex may produce a vena-contracta effect which aerodynamically reduces the effective tip clearance in what is typically the leakiest region; consequently, the suction side shelf 118 may allow over-tip leakage to be reduced and/or redirection of the over-tip flow so as to align it with the suction side flow field.
The trailing segment 120b of the pressure side rail 120 extends flush with the pressure side 110 of the airfoil 100 from an origination location at or near the trailing edge 108 to a middle location 122 on the pressure side 110 of the airfoil 100. The middle location 122 may be understood to be at or near a midpoint of the pressure side 110 of the airfoil 100 with respect to the leading and trailing edges 106,108. The leading segment 120a extends from the middle location 122 toward the suction side 112 of the airfoil 100, crossing over a camber line 134 on the tip surface 104 and creating a pressure side shelf 124 between the pressure side rail 120 and the pressure side 110 of the airfoil 100. More specifically, the pressure side shelf 124 is formed between the leading segment 120a of the pressure side rail 120 and the pressure side 110 of the airfoil 100. While the camber line 134 is not shown in all of the drawings, it is understood to be inherent to the tip surface 104 of the airfoil 100. The leading segment 120a of the pressure side rail 120 may terminate on the suction side 112 of the airfoil 100, as shown in
The pressure side rail 120 may be spaced apart from the suction side rail 114 on the tip surface 104 at or near the trailing edge 108 to allow fluid flow to exit the tip structure 102. More specifically, the trailing portion 114b of the suction side rail 114 and the trailing segment 120b of the pressure side rail 120 may be spaced apart at the trailing edge 108. To achieve this spacing, one or both of the pressure and suction side rails 120,114 may have an origination location short of the trailing edge 108, as shown by the embodiments of
Returning to
When a rail or rail portion (e.g., pressure side rail, suction side rail, leading segment of the pressure side rail, etc.) on the tip surface is described as originating or terminating “near the [position]” or “short of the [position],” where [position] may be substituted with leading edge, trailing edge, intermediate location or another location, it may be understood that the rail or rail portion originates or terminates a distance d or less from the [position], where the distance d is equal to 20% of a total length of the rail.
As shown in
Similarly, the leading segment 120a of the pressure side rail 120 may be substantially straight or gently curved, as shown in
Referring now to
Various embodiments of the tip structure 102, including those described in this disclosure and shown in the figures, have been evaluated using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. To carry out the CFD simulations, a computational domain is specified based on the tip structure, a grid is generated, and various inputs are provided (boundary conditions, fluid properties, etc.) to model the flow field as it passes over the tip. The results of the CFD simulations are compared to results obtained from CFD simulations of a previously developed tip, which is sometimes called a squealer tip and will be referred to as a “standard tip” in the description that follows. The standard tip includes pressure and suction side rails that follow the perimeter of the tip surface along the pressure and suction sides of the airfoil and meet at both the leading edge and trailing edge of the airfoil, as shown in
When compared with the CFD results from the standard tip, the new tip structures exhibit improvements in relative aerodynamic stage efficiency of as much as 0.53% and reductions in airfoil tip heat transfer of as much as −65%. For example, the tip structure 102 shown in
The tip structure shown in
The pressure and suction side rails 120,114, as well as the optional joining rail 126 and the optional additional rail 128, referred to collectively as “the rails,” may have any of a wide range of widths (or thicknesses) and heights above the tip surface 104 in any of the embodiments described herein. Typically, each of the rails is from about 0.02 inch to about 0.05 inch in width and from about 0.015 inch to about 0.05 inch in height. The height and/or thickness of the rails need not be constant along the length. A transverse cross-sectional view of any of the rails may reveal a square or rectangular cross-section, typically with a fillet (rounded junction) at the base of each rail.
To promote tip cooling, the tip structures 102 described in this disclosure may include cooling holes 132 that extend through the tip surface 104 so as to be in fluid communication with a coolant cavity used to circulate cooling fluid within the body (or spar) of the airfoil 100 and onto the tip surface 104. Generally speaking, the cooling holes 132 may have any configuration on the tip surface 104 as long as they are distributed adjacent to or between the rails.
The airfoils described herein according to various embodiments may be fabricated using investment casting methods known in the art. The various rails on the tip surface (e.g., pressure and suction side rails, optional joining rail and optional additional rail) may be integrally formed with the tip structure during the casting process. Also or alternatively, the rails could be formed or modified in size or shape by machining after casting. The airfoil may be formed from one or more materials that have high melting points, good oxidation/corrosion resistance and high-temperature strength. For example, a nickel-base superalloy may be suitable. The superalloy may have an equiaxed, directionally solidified, or single-crystal microstructure.
To clarify the use of and to hereby provide notice to the public, the phrases “at least one of <A>, <B>, . . . and <N>” or “at least one of <A>, <B>, . . . <N>, or combinations thereof” or “<A>, <B>, . . . and/or <N>” are defined by the Applicant in the broadest sense, superseding any other implied definitions hereinbefore or hereinafter unless expressly asserted by the Applicant to the contrary, to mean one or more elements selected from the group comprising A, B, . . . and N. In other words, the phrases mean any combination of one or more of the elements A, B, . . . or N including any one element alone or the one element in combination with one or more of the other elements which may also include, in combination, additional elements not listed.
While various embodiments have been described, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many more embodiments and implementations are possible. Accordingly, the embodiments described herein are examples, not the only possible embodiments and implementations.
Furthermore, the advantages described above are not necessarily the only advantages, and it is not necessarily expected that all of the described advantages will be achieved with every embodiment.
The present patent document claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/463,928, on Feb. 27, 2017, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3339933 | Foster | Sep 1967 | A |
3616125 | Bowling | Oct 1971 | A |
3628885 | Sidenstick et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3854842 | Caudill | Dec 1974 | A |
4390320 | Eiswerth | Jun 1983 | A |
4424001 | North | Jan 1984 | A |
4893987 | Lee et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
5564902 | Tomita | Oct 1996 | A |
5733102 | Lee et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
6059530 | Lee | May 2000 | A |
6179556 | Bunker | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190129 | Mayer | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6554575 | Leeke | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6672829 | Cherry | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6991430 | Stec et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7281894 | Lee et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7473073 | Liang | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7740445 | Liang | Jun 2010 | B1 |
8011889 | Liang | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8113779 | Liang | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8182221 | Liang | May 2012 | B1 |
9085988 | Kwon et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9284845 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
20070258815 | Liang | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20130266454 | Mongillo, Jr. et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130302166 | Lee | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140112753 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150292335 | Dawson et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2955738 | Feb 2016 | CA |
2 316 988 | May 2011 | EP |
WO 2014099814 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO-2016007116 | Jan 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report and Written Opinion for European Patent No. 18153946.1-1006, dated Apr. 11, 2018, 7 pages. |
Ameri, A. A. et al., “Effect of Squealer Tip on Rotor Heat Transfer and Efficiency,” ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 120, 4 (1998) pp. 753-759. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180245469 A1 | Aug 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62463928 | Feb 2017 | US |