Applicant incorporates by reference herein his co-pending application “Optic System for Light Guide with Controlled Output”, filed concurrently with this application.
This invention relates generally to light display devices, and more particularly is a flat panel display in which the light is switched by enabling and disabling total internal reflection (TIR), and in which the switched light is directed by optics.
Many products require flat panel displays to display video, computer or other data. Liquid crystal displays, LCDs, have become the dominant technology utilized in flat panel displays. Another, less common technology used for flat panel displays is plasma technology. Other known display technologies used in thicker flat panel displays are of the rear projection type. For very large displays, discrete arrays of LEDs are the dominant technology. These display technologies are used in many types of products including; cellular phones, laptop computers, computer monitors, TVs, large commercial displays, and billboards. CRT type displays, that used to be the dominant technology, have almost vanished even though the performance of the newer technologies is not significantly greater than CRT. Some current art LCD displays still cannot match the refresh rate of CRTs.
Displays based on LCD technology have been evolving for decades. Thousands of patents have been filed on improvements to the basic technology. Still, the performance of these displays lacks in many ways.
A first shortcoming of LCD display technology is the high energy consumption. A 65″ diagonal HDTV LCD TV typically draws around a half of a kilowatt. This is a result of the poor efficiency of the technology. LCDs need polarized light to function. However, approximately half of the light generated by the backlight is absorbed in the creation of polarized light. Many inventions have been devised to reduce this loss. In reality, little real improvement has been realized by manufactures due to cost or the reduction in other performance parameters. One product that is designed to recycle light not having the correct polarization is called “DBEF” and is manufactured by 3M of Minneapolis, Minn.
Another factor that contributes to the low efficiency of LCD displays is the fact that pixels that are turned off absorb light rather than reflect it to another pixel that is on.
Another shortcoming of LCD displays is their limitations when used with color filters. Typically red, green, and blue filters are used to create colors. These filters do not reflect unused light, but rather absorb it. For example: red filters absorb the green and blue light while only letting red light pass through. In theory, a perfect blue filter would let 33% of the light through. In reality filter materials perform significantly less than the theoretical 33%. Another place where light is absorbed is in the matrix between the color filters. This matrix area is required for circuitry and transistors used to control the pixels. The required area is significant in that one pixel requires three transistors, one transistor being required for each of the three colors. Also, additional circuitry is required to drive the transistors. The matrix area between the filters may absorb approximately half the overall light available. When all of these and other losses such as reflection and material absorption are taken into consideration, an LCD panel may only be 8% efficient when all of the pixels are on. Typically an image has approximately one half of the pixels turned on when creating an image, and with the half of the pixels that are off absorbing rather than reflecting, the resulting LCD efficiency is only in the 4% range.
This poor efficiency requires the backlights used with LCD displays to be large and powerful. The dominant lamp technology used in displays is fluorescent type lamps. These lamps are reasonably efficient but require mercury. The mercury creates a disposal problem. In many cases, the mercury ends up in our food chain.
Another deficiency with LCD technology is the refresh rate. Only in the very recent past have LCDs been able to equal the refresh rate of CRT displays. For demanding applications such as the viewing of moving videos, the slow refresh rate of LCDs is apparent. Other problems with LCDs are poor contrast ratios. The contrast problem is exacerbated when viewed from a position off normal to the display surface.
The quality of the colors from a LCD display are limited by the wavelengths of light emitted from the light source and the properties of the color filters used in the display. Both of these factors result in displays that cannot accurately reproduce colors found in nature.
Another deficiency with LCD technology is their limited environmental operating range. The liquid crystal material doesn't function well at high and low temperatures. Displays that are used in extreme environments are often cooled or heated to keep them within a moderate operating range. Another problem with using LCDs in non-optimal environment is that the polarizing films required for LCD displays degrade when exposed to high humidity. Measures must be taken to reduce the effect of this property. In displays that are used in extreme environments the displays and their polarizing films are encased in glass windows.
Plasma thin panel displays are the typical technology of choice for large screen TVs. The plasma displays also consume a significant amount of power. Plasma TVs do not last as long as LCD TVs and experience “burn in”. Burn in occurs when the on pixels remain on for a long period of time. These pixels lose their strength and become washed out over time. Cost is another issue with plasma technology.
In TV applications the projector is often deployed in a rear projection configuration. For computer monitors using projection display, the front projection mode is more commonly used.
Most rear and front projection displays utilize a MEMS mirror array. A MEMS mirror array in disclosed in each of U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,566,935; 4,596,992; 4,615,595; 4,662,746; 4,710,732; 4,956,619; and 5,028,939; all by inventor Larry Hornbeck of Texas, and assigned to Texas Instruments (TI) of Texas. The TI technology uses an array of MEMS mirrors that change their incidence angle to the light path to switch the light from an off position to an on position. When the mirror is in the on position, the mirror reflects the light through the optical path. When the mirror is in the off position, the light is reflected to a path that falls outside the projection optics. This in effect turns the light valve to an off state.
There are many deficiencies with this technology. One is that the light transmission is less than 70%. To allow for the change of angular orientation of the mirrors, there must be a substantial space between adjacent mirrors. The required gap causes a lot of light to be wasted. Further, the reflected light is absorbed into the light valve. The absorbed energy makes cooling the switching devices that use this technology a challenge.
Another flat panel display technology is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,319,491 by inventor Martin Selbrede of Thousand Oaks, Calif. This patent discloses a method in which the shape of an elastic membrane is changed to allow light to escape from a light guide. It is difficult to control the shape of the elastomer and therefore difficult to control the light output from the pixel. Light output from the pixels is dependent on the angle at which the light strikes the membrane. Also the angle at which the light exits the panel is off from normal. Typically light normal to the screen is the orientation in which you want the most output. Contrast ratio is limited with the elastic membrane technology. This limitation is due to the fact that any flaw in the light or optics lets light escape. An extremely small defect can produce enough light leakage to result in poor contrast when the display is primarily black. In high ambient lighting conditions the contrast is reduced by another factor. This factor is that the deformed elastomer will reflect, in some instances, the ambient light to the viewer.
Another flat panel display technology is disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,040,937; 6,674,562; 6,867,896; and others all by inventor Mark Miles of Boston, Mass. These inventions control the distance between optical elements to control the interference characteristics of the pixel. This technology is only effective in a reflective mode and is therefore not applicable to most display applications. Three optical switches are required to create red, green, and blue colors. Not only are three-color optical switches required, but also the electronics to drive the switches must also be included.
Another display invention was recently disclosed in U.S. Publications 20050248827; and 20060070379, both by inventor Gary Starkweather of WA and assigned to Microsoft, also of WA. This technology is similar to the Hornbrook technology in that it switches light by bending or moving mirrors. This technology suffers due to its high complexity and therefore high cost. The advantage of this technology is that its theoretical efficiency is better than most other technologies. But in practice, the technology requires a collimated back light source. Sources of this type are inefficient and costly. The cost of a display with this technology will be high and the efficiency still poor. Further, the creation of a collimated backlight source requires that there be considerable depth to the display. This depth is not desirable to consumers and therefore reduces the market for this technology.
The current invention utilizes micro-optical components. Some of the prior art related to this field should also be discussed. U.S. Pat. No. 6,421,103, by Akira Yamaguchi of Japan and assigned to Fuji Film, discloses a backlight for use with LCD panels. This patent discloses light sources, a substrate, apertures (not used as a light guide), and reflective regions on the substrate. The light is either reflected by the reflective surface or passes through the apertures. The light that passes through the apertures is captured by a lens and is used to control the direction of the light. The Yamaguchi reference teaches a restricted angle of the light to concentrate more light directly at the viewer of an LCD type display.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,396,350, by Karl Beeson of Princeton, N.J., discloses a light guide with optical elements that are used to extract light from the light guide. The optical elements are on the viewer's side of the panel and have limited ability to control the direction of the light. This invention is intended to be used in conjunction with an LCD type panel to concentrate light towards the viewer.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a flat panel display with greatly improved light transmission efficiency with less power usage.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a less complex flat panel display, thereby reducing the cost to manufacture the display.
It is a further object to provide a flat panel display that will function over a wide temperature range.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a light valve that can switch faster by using only a small movement in the optical elements during the switching.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a flat panel display with a higher contrast ratio than current art displays.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a flat panel display with improved color replication.
The present invention is a light valve for use in thin flat panel displays. Flat panel displays are used in cellular phones, laptop computers, computer monitors, TVs, and commercial displays. The light valve of the present invention either extracts light or allows light to travel up a light guide through the TIR process.
Light is initially injected into the light guide from the edges of the light guide. Light then travels up the light guide by reflecting off of the inside surfaces of the light guide. If the light reaches the top of the light guide, reflective material reflects the light back toward the bottom of the light guide.
As light travels up and down the light guide, the light will typically find a point where an element of the TIR switch is in an on position, in contact with the light guide. When a switch element contacts the light guide, light is extracted from the light guide and is directed to an optic system that redirects the light to the viewer. Switch elements that are not in contact with the surface of the light guide do not extract light. Contacting switches create an “on” pixel, while a switch not in contact with the light guide will create an “off” pixel.
Additional optics and masks can be added to a given system to improve contrast ratios, viewing angle, and other parameters that are important to the display viewer. By switching the pixels in sequence with alternating colors of light, a full color display can be created with a minimal number of switches. When a full gamut of colors is fed into the light guide, sequenced switching allows the colors to be presented to the viewer without filtering.
An advantage of the present invention is that it enables a flat panel display with far greater resolution than current art devices.
Another advantage of the present invention is that the technology is easily manufactured in a flat panel display.
A still further advantage of the present invention is that the device switches much faster than the prior art as it requires a very small movement of the optics to accomplish the switching.
Yet another advantage of the present invention is that it provides better color replication with a higher contrast ratio.
Still another advantage of the present invention is that the display functions well in non-ideal environments.
These and other objectives and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art in view of the description of the best presently known mode of carrying out the invention as described herein and as illustrated in the drawings.
Referring first to
The four major components 6, 7, 8, 10, shown exploded in
In
Referring now to
Electronic components may be located on the planar surface 21 of the electronics back plane 10. For clarity, no components are shown in
Referring now to
The TIR switch film 8 is shown in
Spacer posts 34 comprise another main element of the TIR switch film 8. The spacer posts 34 are located between the contact domes 32. The spacer posts 34 maintain the narrow gap 60 (visible in
The bottom spacer posts 34′ are formed from the lower end of the spacer posts 34. The bottom surface of the bottom spacer posts 34′ is in contact with and bonded to the planar surface 21 of the electronics back plane 10. The top surface of the spacer post 34 is bonded to the light guide 7. The adhesive for this bond should have a low index of refraction. If the adhesive has too high an index, the mating surface of the light guide 7 would need to be coated with a low index material.
Referring next to
Angle A=arcsine(1/1.5)=41.8° for Ns=1 and Nlg=1.5
If the internal angle A is less than 41.8°, light reflects off of the internal surface. If the angle A is greater than 41.8°, the light passes through the surface and is refracted to a different angle.
There are three cases where different materials are adjacent one another, and angle A is different for all three, they are:
Case 1 is when the light guide (index 1.5) is adjacent to air (index 1)
Case 2 is when the light guide (index 1.5) is adjacent a contact dome (index 1.5)
Case 3 is when the light guide (index 1.5) is adjacent a low index material (index 1.35)
Calculating the angle A for these three cases:
A=arcsine(Ns/Nlg)
Case 1 For Ns=1, Nlg=1.50 A=arcsine(1/1.50)=41.8°
Case 2 For Ns=1.50, Nlg=1.50 A=arcsine(1.50/1.50)=90°
Case 3 For Ns=1.35, Nlg=1.50 A=arcsine(1.35/1.50)=64.2°
From these three calculations it can be seen that light will continue to reflect down the light guide 7 when the approach angle of the light rays 41 is less than 62.5 degrees from normal to the surface of the light guide 7. Case 1 and case 3 are conditions where light would TIR. In case 2, the light does not TIR. The light passes through the surface of the light guide 7 and continues along its original path through the contact dome 32.
It should be noted that the light guide 7 and the contact dome 32 may not have the same index of refraction. If the indexes of refraction are not equal, some refraction will take place at the interface of the light guide 7 and the contact dome 32. The difference in the index of refraction between the materials determines the amount of the refraction. Preferably the index of refraction of the contact dome 32 is greater than that of the light guide 7. If the index of refraction of the contact dome 32 is less than that of the light guide 7, some of the light that is traveling at large angles normal to the surface of the light guide 7 would TIR and not pass through to the contact dome 32.
To correlate the three classes of angle A to
The third internal light rays 45 continue beyond the contact dome 32 and reflect off of the surface of the reflector 35. The reflector 35 is preferably coated with a high reflectance material such as aluminum, silver, or a dielectric coating. The contour of the reflector 35 surface determines the direction of the reflected light 48. As discussed above, the contoured reflectors 35 are preferably aspheric in shape.
Light will often travel the length of the light guide 7 from the LED 3 and not strike a contact dome 32 that is in the on position. The light will therefore TIR and will not be extracted from the light guide 7. In this case the light continues to travel along the full length of the light guide 7 until the light reaches the distal end of the light guide 7, and is reflected off end reflector 9′. This reflection redirects the light in the opposite direction back through the light guide 7. The light then travels back along the length of the light guide 7, and assuming it strikes no activated contact domes 32, will return to the first end of the light guide 7, the end on which the LEDs 3,4,5 are located.
At the first end, the light will either strike the area between the LEDs 3,4,5 or it will strike the LEDs 3,4,5. When the light strikes the area between the LEDs 3,4,5, it will be reflected by the end reflector 9. If the TIR switched thin flat panel display 1 has only a few LEDs 3,4,5, the light will almost always reflect off of the high reflectance end reflector 9. In some cases the light will reflect off of an LED 3,4,5. The LED 3,4,5 will absorb a portion of the light, and the remainder of the light will be reflected. Light may travel up and down the light guide 7 a number of times before it is extracted by a contact dome 32. This would be the case when only a few contact domes 32 are on and extracting light. If a lot of the contact domes 32 were on and in contact with the light guide 7, the likelihood of light making more than one or two passes along the light guide 7 is small. Even if there are a large number of reflections and the light makes multiple passes along the light guide 7, the loss of light is small. The end reflectors 9, 9′ may have reflectance efficiencies of 98% or better, and good quality light guide material absorbs very little light.
Referring now to
The low index layer 51 is thin and has a low index of refraction. An air gap or a vacuum layer could serve as the low index layer 51, but forming the low index layer 51 from a low refraction index solid material is often beneficial to the assembly of the device. The low index layer 51 will typically be an adhesive that affixes the spacer plate 52 to the light guide 7. In applications that require extremely thin displays, the low index layer 51 and the spacer plate 52 can be combined into one element, a thicker low index layer 51. However, for most larger displays, the use of two different materials to form the low index layer 51 and the spacer plate 52 is more beneficial.
Two thin layers, the mask plate 53 and the first diffuser 55, are positioned between the spacer plate 52 and the second spacer 56. The mask plate 53 contains multiple aperture holes 54 (see
The first diffuser 55 is an optional diffuser to spread the light coming from the reflectors 35. For small displays the first diffuser 55 may not be required, but for displays with large pixels, the first diffuser 55 should be included. It should also be noted that the positions of the mask plate 53 and the first diffuser 55 could be reversed without affecting the function of the display.
The second spacer 56 allows the light transmitted from the reflectors 35 to begin to spread out. The second diffuser 57 is used to spread the light still further so that the viewer can be at a position far from normal to the display and still see the light from the reflectors 35. The amount and direction of diffusion that is incorporated into the second diffuser 57 will vary for different types of displays. For example, small cell phone displays typically have a smaller viewing angle in both the vertical and horizontal directions. TVs typically have a large viewing angle in the horizontal direction and not as big a viewing angle in the vertical direction.
Referring now to
It should be noted that electrostatic force is not the only means that can be used to control the contact of the contact domes 32 with the surface of the light guide 7. One alternate method would be the use of a piezoelectric material. Another would be to use magnetism. Those skilled in the art of actuation devices could devise many ways to change the positions of the contact domes 32. Further, there are a limitless number of electronic circuits that could be devised to drive the actuator.
For example, to create a yellow image at a pixel, the contact dome 32 would extract light from the light guide 7 when the red LED 5 is on. After the red LED 5 goes off, the blue LED 4 is turned on. The contact dome 32 does not extract light during the time the blue LED 4 is on. The green LED 3 would be turned on after the blue LED 4 is turned off. When the green LED 3 is on, the contact dome 32 would again allow light to reach the viewer. This would happen hundreds of times per second resulting in the human eye integrating the red and green into yellow. The length of time that the contact dome 32 allows light to reach the viewer determines the brightness. By altering the individual time periods for the red and green the hue of the yellow can be controlled. Some blue light can be added to reduce the saturation of the yellow.
It should be noted that LEDs do not typically emit a wide range of wavelengths of light. A high quality display may include LEDs with wavelengths between the primary RGB LEDs. Examples are orange, cyan and yellow. By adding these extra wavelengths the spectrum output of the TIR display could be made to match what a viewer would see in the real world. Very little additional circuitry is required to add this improved performance.
It should also be noted that electronics are required to control the switches and the LEDs of the present invention. Electronics are also required to relate the operation of the optics elements to a computer, TV, or other type of video signal. Control electronics of this type are created for display systems that create colors by multiplexing the colors in time. One skilled in the art would be able to devise many ways to accomplish this task. The innovative part of this invention is the optical switching and optics, not the configuration of the electronic components.
Another configuration of the device is shown in
The above disclosure is not intended as limiting. Those skilled in the art will readily observe that numerous modifications and alterations of the device may be made while retaining the teachings of the invention. Accordingly, the above disclosure should be construed as limited only by the restrictions of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
223898 | Edison | Jan 1880 | A |
2673923 | Williams | Mar 1954 | A |
2971083 | Phillips et al. | Feb 1961 | A |
4172631 | Yevick | Oct 1979 | A |
4392187 | Bornhorst | Jul 1983 | A |
4566935 | Hornbeck | Jan 1986 | A |
4596992 | Hornbeck | Jun 1986 | A |
4615595 | Hornbeck | Oct 1986 | A |
4662746 | Hornbeck | May 1987 | A |
4710732 | Hornbeck | Dec 1987 | A |
4956619 | Hornbeck | Sep 1990 | A |
4972306 | Bornhorst | Nov 1990 | A |
5028939 | Hornbeck et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5083252 | McGuire | Jan 1992 | A |
5126886 | Richardson et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5217285 | Sopori | Jun 1993 | A |
5221987 | Laughlin | Jun 1993 | A |
5319491 | Selbrede | Jun 1994 | A |
5396350 | Beeson | Mar 1995 | A |
5467208 | Kokawa et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5631895 | Okada et al. | May 1997 | A |
5825548 | Bornhorst et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5936772 | Suzuki | Aug 1999 | A |
5953469 | Zhou | Sep 1999 | A |
5995690 | Kotz et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6040937 | Miles | Mar 2000 | A |
6048081 | Richardson | Apr 2000 | A |
6350041 | Tarsa | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360033 | Lee et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6421103 | Yamaguchi | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6421104 | Richard | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438283 | Karaguleff et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6502961 | Richardson | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6565233 | Richardson | May 2003 | B1 |
6674562 | Miles | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6729734 | Childers et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6768572 | Romanovsky | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6771325 | Dewald et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6824270 | Kim et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6867896 | Miles | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6924945 | Richardson | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6974232 | Richardson | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7080932 | Keuper | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7123216 | Miles | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7142744 | Walter et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7144131 | Rains | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7177498 | Cizek | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7286296 | Chaves et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7345824 | Lubart | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7380962 | Chaves et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7447397 | Maki et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7499206 | Richardson | Mar 2009 | B1 |
8025434 | Ahlgren et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8152352 | Richardson | Apr 2012 | B2 |
20020031294 | Takeda et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020044720 | Brophy et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020105709 | Whitehead et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040076396 | Suga | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040109105 | Nagakubo | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050018147 | Lee et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050057731 | Lee et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050221473 | Dubin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243570 | Chaves | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050248827 | Starkweather et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050270796 | Ichikawa | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060070379 | Starkweather et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070133224 | Parker | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070176887 | Uehara | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070211487 | Sormani | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080170296 | Chaves et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080247169 | Zou | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090064993 | Ghosh | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090116099 | Richardson | May 2009 | A1 |
20090262368 | Leong | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100085773 | Richardson | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100135040 | Adachi et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100172138 | Richardson | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100220492 | Richardson | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100315802 | Richardson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100315836 | Richardson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100328748 | Richardson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
814300 | Dec 1997 | EP |
867747 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0969305 | Jan 2000 | EP |
0969306 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1215526 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1291833 | Mar 2003 | EP |
2045633 | Apr 2009 | EP |
663840 | Dec 1951 | GB |
02002229017 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2004068183 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2008060335 | May 2008 | WO |
2009024952 | Feb 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100172138 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |