This application is a 371 national phase entry of PCT/EP2014/075597 filed 26 Nov. 2014, which claims the benefit of French Patent Application No. 1361862, filed 29 Nov. 2013, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
A tire in the known way comprises an internal carcass, a tread, a bead for attachment to a rim, a sidewall, and an inner liner. The internal carcass is made up of at least one carcass ply of rubber-coated threads. During a stage in the manufacture of the tire, this carcass ply is cut and assembled onto a building drum. Because this ply may make a number of turns around this drum, there are thus a plurality of layers formed from one and the same carcass ply. Now, it sometimes happens that, during the placement of the ply, the end of this ply does not coincide exactly with the start of this ply on the drum, meaning that there is a surplus of ply in the assembly. This superposition locally creates an additional thickness on the green tire. Once this green tire has been vulcanized and the resulting tire has been inflated, this additional thickness gives the appearance of a crater in the sidewall of the tire. Now, this crater is particularly visible on the tire, notably under certain lighting conditions, and may form a reason for a consumer not to purchase the tire even through this defect is not detrimental to safety. In order to mask this defect on the sidewall of the tire, according to the prior art described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,439,287, it is proposed that a moiré pattern be formed over the entire sidewall of the tire, and notably in the region where the distortion/cratering deformation created by the overlapping of the ends of the carcass ply or plies occurs. A number of moiré patterns are described. These moiré patterns constitute interference patterns notably comprising striations. Thus, these moiré patterns create interferences when light is reflected off the sidewall of the tire. The differences in light reflection that there are between the distorted/cratered region and the rest of the surface of the sidewall are thus no longer visible to the naked eye.
One problem with this prior art is that the method of manufacturing these moiré patterns is complex and costly to implement. Another problem is that the pattern does not provide the consumer with an appearance he regards as satisfactory.
That being the case, the aspects disclosed herein seek to mask this sidewall deformation defect in a way that is simpler, and to do so for the vast majority of angles from which a consumer might observe the tire.
A “tire” means any type of resilient tire whether or not subjected to an internal pressure.
The “tread” of a tire means a quantity of rubbery material delimited by lateral surfaces and by two main surfaces, one of them an inner surface and the other an outer surface, the said outer surface being intended to come into contact with a roadway when the tire is being driven on.
The “bead” of a tire means a part of the tire that is intended to be seated on a wheel rim.
The “sidewall” of a tire means a lateral surface of the tire positioned between the tire tread and a bead of this tire.
A “protruding element interpenetrating with other adjacent protruding elements” means that the spherical cap formed by the protruding element is interrupted by the other adjacent protruding elements so that the distance between the tip of the spherical cap and the tip of another adjacent protruding element is less than the diameter of this spherical cap.
A “pattern formed on a sidewall” means a sidewall part having homogeneous surface finish features that differ from the rest of the sidewalk. This pattern may deliver technical and legal information and, on the other hand, may allow consumers to discern the origin of the product.
To this end, the invention proposes a tire made of rubbery material comprising a sidewall and a pattern formed on this sidewall. The pattern comprises a plurality of protruding elements, the said protruding dements having the form of spherical-cap portions. Within the pattern, each protruding element interpenetrates with several adjacent protruding elements so that the distance between a tip of the protruding element and a tip of another adjacent protruding element is less than the diameter of the protruding element.
Thus as will be seen later, the interpenetration of the spherical caps with one another makes it possible to avoid too great an absorption of light by the texture of the sidewall of the tire. Rays of light originating from one and the same light source and illuminating the sidewall of the tire are thus substantially deflected in the same way on the pattern, both in the region of the pattern covering the deformed part of the sidewall and in the region of the pattern covering the sidewall where there is no deformation.
According to some nonlimiting examples, the tire may furthermore comprise one or more additional features from among the following:
The density of protruding elements within the pattern is greater than or equal to 0.2 protruding elements per mm2. That makes it possible to give the pattern a more uniform appearance to an observer.
Viewed in cross section, all or part of the protruding elements subtend an angle less than or equal to 70°. That makes it possible to obtain a better surface for reflection of the light. The pattern thus appears more clearly on the sidewall of the tire.
The protruding elements are aligned with one another within the pattern. The limits of the pattern are thus better controlled.
All or part of the protruding elements have a surface roughness parameter Ra less than 30 μm. That makes it possible to obtain a surface close to a polished surface and thus to limit the scattering of the light.
The tire comprises a housing recessed into the sidewall, the pattern being arranged in the housing.
The protruding elements meet at connection zones, these connection zones being curved. These zones have a blend radius r such that r≤R/3.
Further features and advantages will become apparent from the following description, given by way of non-limiting example, with reference to the attached drawings in which:
In the description which will follow, elements that are substantially identical or similar will be denoted by identical references.
A spherical cap means a cap the radius R of which is constant. As an alternative, the radius R of the caps may vary by plus or minus 10%.
When viewed in cross section,
In one nonlimiting embodiment illustrated in
Within the pattern 5, each spherical cap 7 interpenetrates with several adjacent protruding elements. Thus, as illustrated in
As can be seen in
In order optimally to reduce these inter-cap spaces 9, in one nonlimiting embodiment, viewed in section (cross section of
By reducing the surface area of the inter-cap space 9, incident rays of light impinging on the pattern 5 and therefore on the spherical caps 7 are reflected back towards the observer. With this pattern 5, very little light is absorbed by the texture of the sidewall of the tire. There is therefore no zone referred to as “black”. The light is reflected in the same way (same angle of reflection) on the pattern 5 covering the distortion/cratering defect 8 as it is on the pattern covering that part of the sidewall 3 that has no defect. Thus, the visual effect created by the distortion/cratering 8 is practically no longer visible, if visible at all, whatever the position of the observer with respect to the sidewall of the tire. The entire pattern 5 makes it possible to create what is referred to as a “white” region because of the optimized reflection off light of this pattern 5.
In order to increase the reflection of light, the caps have a texture which is close to a smooth reflective surface which does not scatter the light or reduce the reflective light intensity. Thus, the arithmetic standard deviation parameter Ra indicative of the surface roughness is very low and less than 30 μm. The quantity of light reflected is maximized. Whatever the position of the observer and therefore of the eye with respect to the tire 1 and whatever the light source illuminating the sidewall 3 of the tire, the pattern 5 makes it possible to mask the visual effected created by the defect caused by the overlapping of carcass ply, namely the sidewall deformation.
In order to obtain a method of manufacture that is easy to implement, in one nonlimiting embodiment, the density of protruding elements 7 within the pattern 5 is greater than or equal to 0.2 elements per mm2. Thus, one simple example of a method of manufacturing a mould that corresponds to the negative of the pattern 5 is to machine the mould using a spherical milling cutter.
The aspects disclosed herein is not restricted to the examples described and depicted and various modifications can be made thereto without departing from the scope thereof. Thus, in one nonlimiting embodiment, the protruding elements are made by machining a mould using a milling cutter, the said mould corresponding to the negative of the pattern. This makes it possible to create protruding elements which are aligned within the pattern in at least one preferred direction, and to do so in a simple and economical way.
In another nonlimiting embodiment, the pattern 5 comprises protruding elements 7 which are not aligned.
In one nonlimiting embodiment, the protruding elements 7 are produced during a surface treatment of the mould by micropeening. Using this inexpensive method, a pattern can be created that comprises non-aligned protruding elements.
In another nonlimiting example, the negative of the pattern 5 is produced by laser machining.
Thus, the aspects described notably offers the following advantages:
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
13 61862 | Nov 2013 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2014/075597 | 11/26/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/078881 | 6/4/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6439287 | Baumhofer | Aug 2002 | B1 |
20140378030 | Ikemura | Dec 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102008037483 | Apr 2010 | DE |
2412426 | Jul 1979 | FR |
11321242 | Nov 1999 | JP |
H11321243 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2014136487 | Jul 2014 | JP |
2012066717 | May 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Eisuke Hirosue,JP 2014-136487, machine translation. (Year: 2014). |
Markus Metz, DE 102008037483, machine translation. (Year: 2010). |
Shinobu Itabashi, JP 11-321242, machine translation. (Year: 1999). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160288584 A1 | Oct 2016 | US |