Tire Including A Knitted Fabric

Abstract
A tire that comprises a knit (44) comprising: columns (C1, C2, C3, C4) of loops (B), the loops (B) of one and the same column (C1, C2, C3, C4) being arranged one after the other substantially in an overall direction (X1) referred to as the main direction; and rows (R1, R2, R3, R4) of loops, the loops (B) of one and the same row (R1, R2, R3, R4) being arranged one beside the other substantially in an overall direction (Z1) referred to as the transverse direction.
Description

The subject of the invention is a tire comprising a knit and a method of manufacturing such a tire.


The invention applies to any type of vehicle but is preferably intended for passenger vehicles, two-wheeled vehicles such as motorcycles or bicycles, industrial vehicles selected from vans, heavy vehicles such as “heavy duty vehicles—i.e. underground trains, buses, road haulage vehicles (lorries, tractors, trailers), off-road vehicles—, agricultural vehicles or civil engineering plant, aircraft, other transport or handling vehicles.


A passenger vehicle tire comprising a carcass reinforcement anchored in two beads and surmounted radially by a crown comprising a crown reinforcement and a tread, the latter being connected to the beads by two sidewalls, is known from the prior art.


Tire manufacturers are constantly seeking to increase the cornering stiffness of the tire in order to improve the handling of the tires, particularly when heavily loaded under cornering. A number of solutions have been implemented for this purpose.


A first solution is to provide the tire with a carcass reinforcement that comprises two carcass plies. A second solution is to increase the thickness of the sidewalls. However, the cornering stiffness of a tire using the first solution can still be improved upon and the mass of the tire using the second solution is relatively high.


One object of the invention is a tire offering a compromise between cornering stiffness under high load and mass that is better than the tires using the first and second solutions described above.


To this end, one subject of the invention is a tire comprising at least one knit comprising:

  • columns of loops, the loops of one and the same column being arranged one after the other substantially in an overall direction referred to as the main direction,
  • rows of loops, the loops of one and the same row being arranged one beside the other substantially in an overall direction referred to as the transverse direction, the knit having, in the main overall direction and/or the transverse overall direction, a force at 100% elongation greater than or equal to 250 N, the force at 100% elongation being determined from a force-elongation curve obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix.


By definition, a knit is a reinforcing element comprising stitches. Each stitch comprises a loop interlaced with another loop. Thus, a distinction is made between a knit which is a textile made up of stitches and a woven fabric which is a textile comprising weft threads and warp threads, the weft threads being substantially parallel to one another and the warp threads likewise being substantially parallel to one another.


A distinction is made between weft-knitted knits and warp-knitted knits. In weft knits the stitches are essentially formed in the direction in which the loops of one and the same row are arranged next to one another (across the width of the knit). In warp knits the stitches are essentially formed in the direction in which the loops of one and the same column are arranged next to one another (along the length of the knit).


There are different constructions. A construction means the way in which the threads that form a repeating pattern in the knit are interlaced. Constructions include, nonlimitingly, jersey, welted jersey, 1×1 rib, polka rib, interlocked rib, moss stitch in the case of weft knits and locknit, and atlas in the case of warp knits.


Thanks to the knit, the tire according to the invention has a cornering stiffness higher than that of the tires of the first and second solutions while at the same time being lighter in weight as demonstrated by the results of the comparative tests described hereinbelow.


Standard ISO 13934-1:2013 indicates how to obtain the force-elongation curve for the knit of the tire according to the invention. The standard indicates precisely how, from this force-elongation curve, to determine the elongation at break and the maximum force, notably defining the number of tests, the calculation, and how to express the results relating to these parameters. A person skilled in the art will be just as capable, using this force-elongation curve, of determining the forces at 100%, 50%, 10% elongation, of calculating and expressing the results relating to these parameters in exactly the same way. In particular, the force-elongation curve is produced for test specimens with a width equal to 50 mm±0.5 mm and a length that allows a test length equal to 100 mm±1 mm.


The standard elastomer matrix is a composition that has an apparent modulus MA100 at 100% elongation (namely a modulus calculated with respect to the initial cross section of the test specimen), measured in accordance with standard ASTM D412-1998, test specimen “C”, equal to 1.6 MPa±0.2 MPa, namely ranging from 1.4 to 1.8 MPa. Standard ISO 13934 -1:2013 indicates that the measurements need to be taken over 2 sets of at least 5 test specimens. Each test specimen is manufactured by interposing a layer of knit taken from the material between two layers of the standard elastomer matrix. Each layer has a thickness substantially equal to 0.4 mm. The test specimen thus formed by the knit and the two layers is cured for 15 min at 160° C. under a pressure of 2.4 bar.


In order to achieve these properties (described hereinbelow and hereinabove), the person skilled in the art will know how to vary certain parameters of the knit, such as the construction and certain parameters of the method of manufacturing the knit such as the type of loom used, the gauge of the loom and the course count in the case of weft knits.


According to other preferred features of the tire:

    • The knit has, in the main overall direction and/or the transverse overall direction, a force at 100% elongation greater than or equal to 300 N, preferably 400 N and more preferably 500 N, the force at 100% elongation being determined from a force-elongation curve obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix.
    • The knit has, in the main overall direction and/or the transverse overall direction, a force at 100% elongation less than or equal to 2000 N, preferably 1750 N and more preferably 1600 N, the force at 100% elongation being determined from a force-elongation curve obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix.


According to other preferred features of the tire:

    • The knit has, in the main overall direction and/or the transverse overall direction, a force at 50% elongation greater than or equal to 170 N, preferably 300 N, the force at 50% elongation being determined from a force-elongation curve obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix.
    • The knit has, in the main overall direction and/or the transverse overall direction, a force at 50% elongation less than or equal to 1500 N, preferably 1200 N, the force at 50% elongation being determined from a force-elongation curve obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix.


According to other optional features of the tire:

    • The knit has, in the main overall direction and/or the transverse overall direction, a force at 10% elongation greater than or equal to 60 N, preferably 80 N, the force at 10% elongation being determined from a force-elongation curve obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix.
    • The knit has, in the main overall direction and/or the transverse overall direction, a force at 10% elongation less than or equal to 700 N, preferably 600 N, the force at 10% elongation being determined from a force-elongation curve obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix.


According to other preferred features of the tire:

    • The knit has, in the main overall direction and/or the transverse overall direction, a maximum force greater than or equal to 800 N, the maximum force being measured in accordance with standard ISO 13934-1:2013 applied to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix.
    • The knit has, in the main overall direction and/or the transverse overall direction, a maximum force less than or equal to 4900 N, the maximum force being measured in accordance with standard ISO 13934-1:2013 applied to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix.


According to other preferred features of the tire:

    • The knit has, in the main overall direction and/or the transverse overall direction, an elongation at break greater than or equal to 30%, preferably 100%, the elongation at break being measured in accordance with standard ISO 13934-1:2013 applied to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix. Such an elongation at break is very much higher than a conventional woven fabric for which the elongation at break is of the order of 10% to 15%. Such an elongation allows the knit to deform sufficiently even under extreme cornering loadings.
    • The knit has, in the main overall direction and/or the transverse overall direction, an elongation at break less than or equal to 550%, preferably 500%, the elongation at break being measured in accordance with standard ISO 13934-1:2013 applied to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix.


Advantageously, the features described hereinabove (force at 100%, 50% and 10% elongation, maximum force and elongation at break) can be observed in the main overall direction and/or the transverse overall direction. In an alternative form, they can be observed only in the main overall direction. In another alternative form, they can be observed only in the transverse overall direction. Finally, in a final alternative form, they can be observed in the main overall direction and the transverse overall direction.


For preference, the transverse overall direction of the knit is substantially parallel to the circumferential direction of the tire.


For preference, the main overall direction of the knit is substantially parallel to the radial direction of the tire.


For preference, the force at 100% elongation of the knit in the main direction is greater than the force at 100% elongation of the knit in the transverse overall direction, the forces at 100% elongation being determined from a force-elongation curve obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix.


According to other preferred features of the tire:

  • the force at 100% elongation of the knit in the main direction, determined from a force-elongation curve obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix, is greater than or equal to 250 N, preferably 700 N and more preferably 1000 N, and
  • the force at 100% elongation of the knit in the transverse direction, determined from a force-elongation curve obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix, is greater than or equal to 120 N, preferably 500 N.


According to other preferred features of the tire:

  • the force at 50% elongation of the knit in the main direction, determined from a force-elongation curve obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix, is greater than or equal to 170 N, preferably 500 N, and
  • the force at 50% elongation of the knit in the transverse direction, determined from a force-elongation curve obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix, is greater than or equal to 80 N, preferably 300 N.


According to other preferred features of the tire:

  • the force at 10% elongation of the knit in the main direction, determined from a force-elongation curve obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix, is greater than or equal to 170 N, preferably 280 N, and
  • the force at 10% elongation of the knit in the transverse direction, determined from a force-elongation curve obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix, is greater than or equal to 80 N, preferably 100 N.


According to other preferred features of the tire:

  • the elongation at break of the knit in the main direction measured in accordance with standard ISO 13934-1:2013 applied to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix is less than or equal to 550%, preferably 500%, and
  • the elongation at break of the knit in the transverse direction measured in accordance with standard ISO 13934-1:2013 applied to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix is less than or equal to 1000%, preferably 320%.


According to other preferred features of the tire:

  • the elongation at break of the knit in the main direction measured in accordance with standard ISO 13934-1:2013 applied to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix is greater than or equal to 100%, and


the elongation at break of the knit in the transverse direction measured in accordance with standard ISO 13934-1:2013 applied to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix is greater than or equal to 160%.


According to other preferred features of the tire:

  • the maximum force of the knit in the main direction measured in accordance with standard ISO 13934-1:2013 applied to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix is greater than or equal to 1800 N, and
  • the maximum force of the knit in the transverse direction measured in accordance with standard ISO 13934-1:2013 applied to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix is greater than or equal to 800 N.


According to other preferred features of the tire:

  • the maximum force of the knit in the main direction measured in accordance with standard ISO 13934-1:2013 applied to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix is less than or equal to 4900 N, and
  • the maximum force of the knit in the transverse direction measured in accordance with standard ISO 13934-1:2013 applied to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix is less than or equal to 3200 N.


Advantageously, the main and transverse directions make, with respect to one another, an angle of between 75° and 105°, preferably between 85° and 95°.


In one embodiment, the surface density of stitches of the knit, measured in accordance with standard NF EN 14971, is less than or equal to 400 stitches.cm−2, preferably less than or equal to 100 stitches.cm−2 and more preferably less than or equal to 50 stitches.cm−2.


In one embodiment, the surface density of stitches of the knit, measured in accordance with standard NF EN 14971, is greater than or equal to 5 stitches.cm−2, preferably greater than or equal to 10 stitches.cm−2 and more preferably greater than or equal to 15 stitches.cm−2.


For preference, the knit is made up of one or more filamentary elements of a non-elastomeric material.


Advantageously, the or each non-elastomeric material is selected from a polyester, a polyamide, a polyketone, a polyvinyl alcohol, a cellulose, a mineral fibre, a natural fibre, or a mixture of these materials.


Examples of polyesters include polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene naphthalate (PEN), polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), polybutylene naphthalate (PBN), polypropylene terephthalate (PPT) or polypropylene naphthalate (PPN). Examples of polyamides include an aliphatic polyamide such as nylon or an aromatic polyamide such as aramid. Examples of polyvinyl alcohols include Kuralon®. Examples of cellulose include rayon. Examples of mineral fibres include glass fibres and carbon fibres. Examples of natural fibres include hemp or flax fibres.


Advantageously, the or each filamentary element comprises at least one multifilament strand comprising several elementary monofilaments.


In an alternative form in which the knit comprises a plurality of multifilament strands, all the multifilament strands are made from one and the same material. In another alternative form in which the knit comprises a plurality of multifilament strands, the multifilament strands are made from at least two different materials.


In one embodiment, each filamentary element comprises a single multifilament strand referred to as an overtwist comprising several elementary monofilaments.


In another embodiment, each filamentary element comprises several multifilament strands, each one referred to as an overtwist, each one comprising several elementary monofilaments and assembled together in a helix to form a plied yarn.


For preference, each filamentary element has a tenacity greater than or equal to 30 cN.dtex−1. For example, filamentary elements made of PET have one of the order of 70 cN.dtex−1 and filamentary elements made of aramid have a tenacity of the order of 200 cN.dtex−1.


Advantageously, each multifilament strand comprises between 2 and 2000 elementary monofilaments, preferably between 50 and 1000 elementary monofilaments.


Advantageously, the diameter of each elementary monofilament ranges from 10 82 m to 100 82 m, preferably from 10 μm to 50 μm and more preferably from 12 μm to 30 μm. Such a diameter makes it possible to obtain a knit that is relatively flexible and therefore compatible with use in a tire.


In another embodiment, each filamentary element comprises, is preferably made up of, a single monofilament.


For preference, the knit is coated with a layer of a tackifying adhesive. The adhesive used is for example of the RFL (resorcinol-formaldehyde-latex) type or, for example, as described in the publications WO2013017421, WO2013017422, WO2013017423.


In the tire, the knit is preferably embedded in an elastomer matrix. An elastomer (or rubber, the two terms being synonymous) matrix means a matrix comprising at least one elastomer.


For preference, the elastomer is a diene elastomer. As is known, diene elastomers can be classified into two categories: “essentially unsaturated” or “essentially saturated”. The term “essentially unsaturated” is understood to mean a diene elastomer resulting at least in part from conjugated diene monomers having a content of units of diene origin (conjugated dienes) which is greater than 15% (mol %); thus it is that diene elastomers such as butyl rubbers or copolymers of dienes and of alpha-olefins of EPDM type do not come under the above definition and can especially be described as “essentially saturated” diene elastomers (low or very low content of units of diene origin, always less than 15%). Within the “essentially unsaturated” category of diene elastomers a “highly unsaturated” diene elastomer particularly means a diene elastomer having a content of units of diene origin (conjugated dienes) which is higher than 50%.


Although it is applicable to any type of diene elastomer, the present invention is preferably carried out with a diene elastomer of the highly unsaturated type.


This diene elastomer is more preferably selected from the group consisting of polybutadienes (BRs), natural rubber (NR), synthetic polyisoprenes (IRs), various butadiene copolymers, various isoprene copolymers and mixtures of these elastomers, such copolymers being notably selected from the group consisting of butadiene/stirene copolymers (SBRs), isoprene/butadiene copolymers (BIRs), isoprene/stirene copolymers (SIRs) and isoprene/butadiene/stirene copolymers (SBIRs).


One particularly preferred embodiment consists in using an “isoprene” elastomer, that is to say an isoprene homopolymer or copolymer, in other words a diene elastomer selected from the group consisting of natural rubber (NR), synthetic polyisoprenes (IRs), various isoprene copolymers and mixtures of these elastomers. The isoprene elastomer is preferably natural rubber or a synthetic polyisoprene of the cis-1,4 type. Among these synthetic polyisoprenes, use is preferably made of polyisoprenes having a content (mol %) of cis-1,4 bonds of greater than 90%, even more preferably greater than 98%. According to one preferred embodiment, each layer of rubber composition contains 50 to 100 phr of natural rubber. According to other preferred embodiments, the diene elastomer may consist, in full or in part, of another diene elastomer such as, for example, an SBR elastomer used as a blend with another elastomer, for example of the BR type, or used alone.


The elastomer matrix may contain a single diene elastomer or several diene elastomers, the latter possibly being used in combination with any type of synthetic elastomer other than a diene elastomer, or even with polymers other than elastomers. The rubber composition may also contain all or some of the additives usually employed in rubber matrices intended for the manufacture of tires, such as, for example, reinforcing fillers such as carbon black or silica, coupling agents, antiageing agents, antioxidants, plasticizers or extension oils, whether the latter be of aromatic or nonaromatic nature (notably very weakly aromatic or nonaromatic oils, for example of the naphthene or paraffin type, of high or preferably low viscosity, MES or TDAE oils), plasticizing resins with a high Tg above 300° C., agents that improve the workability (processability) of the compositions in the raw state, tackifying resins, antireversion agents, methylene acceptors and donors such as HMT (hexamethylenetetramine) or H3M (hexamethoxymethylmelamine) for example, reinforcing resins (such as resorcinol or bismaleimide), known adhesion promoting systems of the metallic salts type, for example, notably salts of cobalt, nickel or lanthanide, a crosslinking or vulcanization system.


Preferably, the system for crosslinking the elastomer matrix is a system referred to as a vulcanization system, that is to say one based on sulphur (or on a sulphur donor agent) and a primary vulcanization accelerator. Various known vulcanization activators or secondary accelerators may be added to this basic vulcanization system. Sulphur is used at a preferred content of between 0.5 and 10 phr, and the primary vulcanization accelerator, for example a sulphenamide, is used at a preferred content of between 0.5 and 10 phr. The content of reinforcing filler, for example of carbon black or silica, is preferably greater than 50 phr, especially between 50 and 150 phr.


All types of carbon black, notably blacks of the HAF, ISAF, SAF type conventionally used in tires (so-called tire-grade blacks) are suitable for use as carbon blacks. Among the latter, more particular mention will be made of carbon blacks of (ASTM) grade 300, 600 or 700 (for example N326, N330, N347, N375, N683, N772). Precipitated or pyrogenated silicas having a BET surface area of less than 450 m2/g, preferably from 30 to 400 m2/g are notably appropriate for use as silicas.


A person skilled in the art will know, in the light of the present description, how to adjust the formulation of the rubber composition in order to reach the desired levels of properties (especially elastic modulus) and adapt the formulation to suit the specific application envisaged.


For preference, the elastomer matrix has, in the crosslinked state, a secant extension modulus at 10% elongation of between 4 and 80 MPa, more preferably of between 4 and 20 MPa. Modulus measurements are carried out under tension, unless otherwise indicated, in accordance with the standard ASTM D 412 of 1998 (test specimen “C”): the “true” secant modulus (that is to say the one with respect to the actual cross section of the test specimen) is measured in second elongation (that is to say after an accommodation cycle) at 10% elongation, denoted here by Ms and expressed in MPa (under standard temperature and relative humidity conditions in accordance with the standard ASTM D 1349 of 1999).


In one embodiment, the tire is for industrial vehicles selected from vans, heavy vehicles such as “heavy-duty vehicles”—i.e. underground trains, buses, road haulage vehicles (lorries, tractors, trailers), off-road vehicles -, agricultural vehicles or civil engineering plant, aircraft, other transport or handling vehicles. In another embodiment, the tire is for a passenger vehicle. In yet another embodiment, the tire is for a two-wheeled vehicle.


In a preferred embodiment, the tire comprises a carcass reinforcement anchored in two beads and surmounted radially by a crown reinforcement itself surmounted by a tread which is connected to the beads by two sidewalls, each sidewall comprising the knit.


By positioning the knit in the sidewall, the cornering stiffness of the tire is improved.


In one preferred embodiment, the radially outer end of the knit is axially on the inside with respect to the axially outer end of the crown ply radially adjacent to the knit.


In an even more preferred embodiment, the axial distance between the radially outer end of the knit and the axially outer end of a crown ply radially adjacent to the knit is greater than or equal to 5 mm, preferably greater than or equal to 10 mm, and more preferably greater than or equal to 15 mm.


In one preferred embodiment, the radially outer end of the knit is interposed radially between the carcass reinforcement and the crown reinforcement. As an alternative, the radially outer end of the knit is radially on the outside with respect to the crown reinforcement.


In certain embodiments, the carcass reinforcement is anchored in each bead by being turned up around an annular structure of the bead so as to form a main strand and a turnup.


In one particularly preferred embodiment, the radial distance between the radially inner end of the knit and the radial mid-plane of the annular structure of the bead is less than or equal to 15 mm, preferably less than or equal to 10 mm, and more preferably less than or equal to 5 mm. Thus, if the sidewall becomes pinched against the rim, the knit may prevent damage to the carcass reinforcement. The radial mid-plane is the plane that divides the annular structure into two parts of equal size in the radial direction.


In a first alternative form, the knit extends, in the bead, axially between the main strand and the turnup of the carcass reinforcement.


In a second alternative form, the knit extends, in the bead, axially on the outside of the turnup.


In other embodiments, the knit is arranged axially on the inside of the carcass reinforcement.


In a preferred embodiment, the knit forms a monolithic ring having an axis of revolution substantially parallel to the axis of the tire.


A monolithic ring means that each stitch of the knit is assembled with at least one other stitch of the knit. Thus, in a monolithic ring, there is no overlap between the two ends of the knit. Such a ring makes it possible to simplify the method of manufacture of the tire.


Another subject of the invention is the use of a knit comprising:

  • columns of loops, the loops of one and the same column being arranged one after the other substantially in an overall direction referred to as the main direction,
  • rows of loops, the loops of one and the same row being arranged one beside the other substantially in an overall direction referred to as the transverse direction, the knit having, in the main overall direction and/or the transverse overall direction, a force at 100% elongation greater than or equal to 250 N, the force at 100% elongation being determined from a force-elongation curve obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix by way of a reinforcing element for a tire.


Another subject of the invention is a method of manufacturing a tire as defined hereinabove, in which the knit is embedded in an elastomer matrix.





The invention will be better understood from reading the following description, given solely by way of non-limiting example and with reference to the drawings in which:



FIG. 1 is a view in cross section of a tire according to a first embodiment of the invention comprising at least one knit;



FIG. 2 is a schematic view of the development of the tire of FIG. 1, illustrating the axial distribution of the knits;



FIG. 3 is a detail view of a knit of the tire of FIG. 1;



FIG. 4 is a graph illustrating force-elongation curves for the knit of FIGS. 1 to 3 and of a knit of the prior art;



FIGS. 5 and 6 are views respectively similar to those of FIGS. 1 and 2 of a tire according to a second embodiment;



FIGS. 7 and 8 are views respectively similar to those of FIGS. 1 and 2 of a tire according to a third embodiment;



FIGS. 9 and 10 are views respectively similar to those of FIGS. 1 and 2 of a tire according to a fourth embodiment;



FIGS. 11 and 12 are views respectively similar to those of FIGS. 1 and 2 of a tire according to a fifth embodiment; and



FIGS. 13 and 14 are views respectively similar to those of FIGS. 1 and 2 of a tire according to a sixth embodiment.





In the following description, when using the term “radial”, it is appropriate to make a distinction between several different uses of the word by a person skilled in the art. Firstly, the expression refers to a radius of the tire. It is in that sense that a point A is said to be “radially inside” a point B (or “radially on the inside of” the point B) if it is closer to the axis of rotation of the tire than is the point B. Conversely, a point C is said to be “radially outside” a point D (or “radially on the outside of” the point D) if it is further from the axis of rotation of the tire than is the point D. Progress “radially inwards (or outwards)” will mean progress towards smaller (or larger) radii. It is this sense of the word that applies also when radial distances are being discussed.


On the other hand, a reinforcing element or a reinforcement is said to be “radial” when the reinforcing element or the reinforcing elements of the reinforcement make an angle greater than or equal to 65° and less than or equal to 90° with the circumferential direction.


An “axial” direction is a direction parallel to the axis of rotation of the tire. A point E is said to be “axially inside” a point F (or “axially on the inside of” the point F) if it is closer to the median plane of the tire than is the point F. Conversely, a point G is said to be “axially outside” a point H (or “axially on the outside of” the point H) if it is further from the mid-plane of the tire than is the point H.


The “mid-plane” M of the tire is the plane which is normal to the axis of rotation of the tire and which is situated equidistantly from the annular reinforcing structures of each bead.


A “circumferential” direction is a direction which is perpendicular both to a radius of the tire and to the axial direction.


Furthermore, any range of values denoted by the expression “between a and b” represents the range of values extending from more than a to less than b (namely excluding the end-points a and b), whereas any range of values denoted by the expression “from a to b” means the range of values extending from the end-point “a” as far as the end-point “b”, namely including the strict end-points “a” and “b”.


EXAMPLES OF TIRES ACCORDING TO THE INVENTION

A frame of reference X, Y, Z corresponding to the usual respectively axial (X), radial (Y) and circumferential (Z) directions of a tire has been depicted in the figures.



FIGS. 1 and 2 depict a tire according to a first embodiment of the invention and denoted by the general reference 10. (It will form the tire 101 in the comparative tests hereinbelow). The tire 10 is substantially of revolution about the axis X. The tire 10 here is intended for a passenger vehicle.


The tire 10 comprises a crown 12 comprising a crown reinforcement 14 comprising a working reinforcement 15 comprising two working plies 16, 18 of reinforcing elements and a protective or hooping reinforcement 17 comprising a protective ply 19. The crown reinforcement 14 is surmounted by a tread 20. Here, the protective reinforcement 17, here the protective ply 19, is interposed radially between the working reinforcement 15 and the tread 20.


Two sidewalls 22 extend the crown 12 radially inwards. The tire 10 further comprises two beads 24 radially on the inside of the sidewalls 22 and each comprising an annular reinforcing structure 26, in this instance a bead wire 28, surmounted by a mass of filling rubber 30, as well as a radial carcass reinforcement 32. The carcass reinforcement 32 is surmounted radially by the crown reinforcement 14.


The carcass reinforcement 32 preferably comprises a single carcass ply 34 of radial textile reinforcing elements, the ply 34 being anchored in each of the beads 24 by being turned up around the bead wire 28 so as to form within each bead 24 a main strand 38 extending from the beads 24 through the sidewalls 22 to the crown 12 and a turnup 40, the radially outer end of the turnup 40 here being substantially midway up the height of the tire 10. The carcass reinforcement 32 thus extends from the beads 24 through the sidewalls 22 to the crown 12. As an alternative, the radial reinforcing elements are made of metal. The tire 10 also comprises an inner liner 42, generally made of butyl, arranged axially and radially on the inside of the carcass reinforcement 32.


The working plies 16, 18 comprise metal or textile reinforcing elements conventional to a person skilled in the art and forming an angle of from 15° and 40°, preferably ranging from 20° to 30° and here equal to 26° with the circumferential direction Z of the tire. The reinforcing elements of the working plies are crossed from one working ply to the other.


The protective ply 19 comprises metal or textile reinforcing elements likewise conventional to a person skilled in the art and forming an angle ranging from 0° to 10° with the circumferential direction Z of the tire.


Furthermore, the tire comprises an additional reinforcement 41 comprising at least one additional ply 43. Each additional ply 43 comprises at least one knit 44. The additional ply 43, and in this case the knit 44, are arranged axially on the outside of the carcass reinforcement 34. Thus, as illustrated in FIG. 1, each sidewall 22 comprises a knit 44.


The radially outer end P1 of the knit 44 is axially on the inside of the axially outer end P3 of the crown ply 18 radially adjacent to the knit 44. Furthermore, the radially outer end P1 of the knit 44 is interposed radially between the carcass reinforcement 32 and the crown reinforcement 14.


The axial distance d1 between the radially outer end P1 of the knit 44 and the axially outer end P3 of the crown ply 18 radially adjacent to the knit 44 is greater than or equal to 5 mm, preferably greater than or equal to 10 mm. In this instance, d1=10 mm. In other embodiments, d1 is greater than or equal to 15 mm.


The knit 44 extends, in the bead, axially between the main strand 38 and the turnup 40 of the carcass reinforcement 32. As an alternative, it is possible to conceive of an embodiment in which the knit extends, in the bead, axially on the outside of the turnup 40.


The radial distance d2 between the radially inner end P2 of the knit 44 and the radial mid-plane P4 of the annular structure 26 of the bead 24 is less than or equal to 15 mm, preferably less than or equal to 10 mm, and more preferably less than or equal to 5 mm. Here d2=5 mm.


Each working ply 16, 18, protective ply 19, carcass ply 34 and additional ply 43 comprises an elastomer matrix in which the reinforcing elements of the corresponding ply are embedded. The compositions of the elastomer matrices of the working plies 16, 18, protective ply 19, carcass ply 34 and additional ply 43 are compositions that are conventional for calendering reinforcing elements and containing in the conventional way a diene elastomer, for example natural rubber, a reinforcing filler, for example carbon black and/or silica, a crosslinking system, for example a vulcanization system, preferably containing sulphur, stearic acid and zinc oxide, and possibly a vulcanization retardant and/or accelerator and/or various additives.


The knit 44 is depicted in FIG. 3. The knit 44 comprises columns C1, C2, C3, C4 of loops B and rows R1, R2, R3, R4 of loops B. The loops B of one and the same column Ci are arranged one after another substantially in an overall direction referred to as the main direction X1. The loops B of one and the same row Ri are arranged one beside the other substantially in an overall direction referred to as the transverse direction Z1.


The main X1 and transverse Z1 directions make, with respect to one another, an angle of between 75° and 105°, preferably between 85° and 95°. Here, the main X1 and transverse Z1 directions are substantially perpendicular to one another.


The transverse overall direction Z1 makes an angle at most equal to 10° with the circumferential direction Z of the tire 10 and in this instance an angle equal to 0°, the transverse overall direction Z1 of the knit 44 being substantially parallel to the circumferential direction Z of the tire. The main overall direction X1 of the knit 44 is substantially parallel to the radial direction X of the tire.


The knit 44 has a construction of the jersey type and has been produced using a knitting method conventional to those skilled in the art in this field. The knit 44 has, in the direction Y1, a thickness ranging from 0.7 to 3 mm, preferably 0.8 to 2.6 mm and here equal to 1.6 mm.


The surface density of stitches in the knit, as measured in accordance with standard NF EN 14971, is less than or equal to 400 stitches.cm−2, preferably less than or equal to 100 stitches.cm−2 and more preferably, less than or equal to 50 stitches.cm−2. The surface density of stitches in the knit is also greater than or equal to 5 stitches.cm−2, preferably greater than or equal to 10 stitches.cm−2 and more preferably greater than or equal to 15 stitches.cm−2. In this particular instance, the surface density is equal to 26 stitches.cm−2.



FIG. 4 depicts force-elongation curves obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix as defined hereinabove. In this example, the standard elastomer matrix comprises a diene elastomer, a reinforcing filler, for example carbon black, a vulcanization system and the usual additives employed by those skilled in the art. The compositions of these standard matrices are within the competence of a person skilled in the art who will know how to formulate these in order to obtain the desired apparent modulus MA100 at 100% elongation, in this instance 1.6 MPa±0.2 MPa (ASTM D412-1998, test specimen “C”). Moreover, the apparent modulus MA10 at 10% elongation of the standard elastomer matrix used here is equal to 3.3 MPa±0.5 MPa and the apparent modulus MA300 at 300% elongation of the standard elastomer matrix used here is equal to 1.7 MPa±0.3 MPa (ASTM D412-1998, test specimen “C”).


Curves I (main direction) and II (transverse direction) correspond to the knit 44 described hereinabove. Curves III (main direction) and IV (transverse direction) correspond to a control knit containing filamentary elements made from a material based on a mix of nylon and Spandex, also known by the tradename LYCRA. This control knit has a maximum force equal to 899 N, an elongation at break equal to 595%, a force at 100% elongation equal to 245 N, a force at 50% elongation equal to 161 N and a force at 10% elongation equal to 57 N.


As can be seen in FIG. 4, the knit 44 has particular properties of elongation at break and maximum force which are measured in accordance with standard ISO 13934-1:2013, and properties of force at 10%, 50% and 100% elongation which are determined from a force-elongation curve obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013.


The knit 44 has, in the main overall direction X1 and/or the transverse overall direction Z1, and in this instance in both directions X1 and Z1, a force at 100% elongation that is greater than or equal to 250 N, preferably 300 N and more preferably 400 N and even more preferably, 500 N, and less than or equal to 2000 N, preferably 1750 N and more preferably 1600 N. Under high cornering loads, the knit 44 is heavily loaded. It has been found that, under high cornering loadings, the elongation of the knit in the circumferential direction of the tire 10 is of the order of 100%. Thus, during these high loads, in order to obtain high cornering stiffness, it is desirable for the force of the knit to be relatively high, as is the case for the knits of curves I and II, unlike the knit corresponding to curves III and IV. For preference, the force at 100% elongation in the main direction X1 is greater than or equal to 250 N, preferably 700 N, and more preferably 1000 N, and the force at 100% elongation in the transverse direction Z1 is greater than or equal to 120 N, preferably 500 N.


For preference, the knit 44 has, in the main overall direction X1 and/or the transverse overall direction Z1, and here in both directions X1 and Z1, a force at 50% elongation greater than or equal to 170 N, preferably 300 N, and less than or equal to 1500 N, preferably 1200 N. For preference, the knit 44 has, in the main overall direction X1 and/or the transverse overall direction Z1, and here in both directions X1 and Z1, a force at 10% elongation greater than or equal to 60 N, preferably 80 N, and less than or equal to 700 N, preferably 600 N. For preference, the force at 50% elongation in the main direction X1 is greater than or equal to 170 N, preferably 500 N, and the force at 50% elongation in the transverse direction Z1 is greater than or equal to 80 N, preferably 300 N. For preference, the force at 10% elongation in the main direction X1 is greater than or equal to 170 N, preferably 280 N, and the force at 10% elongation in the transverse direction Z1 is greater than or equal to 80 N, preferably 100 N.


For preference, the knit 44 has, in the main overall direction X1 and/or the transverse overall direction Z1, and here in both directions X1 and Z1, a maximum force greater than or equal to 800 N and less than or equal to 4900 N. The knit 44 corresponding to curves I and II has a higher mechanical strength than the knit corresponding to curves III and IV. This feature is notably advantageous in the case of impacts between the tire and potential obstacles known as “road hazards”. Preferably, the maximum force in the main direction X1 is greater than or equal to 1800 N and the maximum force in the transverse direction Z1 is greater than or equal to 800 N. Preferably, the maximum force in the main direction X1 is less than or equal to 4900 N, and the maximum force in the transverse direction Z1 is less than or equal to 3200 N.


For preference, the knit 44 has, in the main overall direction X1 and/or the transverse overall direction Z1, and here in both directions X1 and Z1, an elongation at break greater than or equal to 30%, preferably 100% and less than or equal to 550%, preferably 500%. By limiting the elongation at break of the knit 44 corresponding to the curves I and II, it is ensured that the knit will not deform needlessly, the elastomer matrix adjacent to the knit in all cases running the risk of breaking before the knit. For preference, the elongation at break in the main direction X1 is less than or equal to 550%, preferably 500%, and the elongation at break in the transverse direction Z1 is less than or equal to 1000%, preferably 320%. For preference, the elongation at break in the main direction X1 is greater than or equal to 100% and the elongation at break in the transverse direction Z1 is greater than or equal to 160%.


It will be noted that, in certain embodiments, the maximum force of the knit 44 in the main overall direction X1 is greater than the maximum force of the knit 44 in the transverse overall direction Z1.


The knit 44 is made up of one or more filamentary elements E of a non-elastomeric material. The or each non-elastomeric material is selected from a polyester, a polyamide, a polyketone, a cellulose, a mineral fibre, a natural fibre, or a mixture of these materials.


The or each filamentary element E comprises at least one multifilament strand comprising several elementary monofilaments. In this particular instance, the or each filamentary element E comprises two strands of nylon each of 140 tex each overtwisted at 250 turns.m−1 in a first direction then plied in a helix around one another at 250 turns.m−1 in a second direction that is opposite to the first direction.


A method of manufacturing the tire 10 as described hereinabove will now be described. Only the main steps relating to the invention will be described, it being easy for the other steps to be carried out on the basis of the general knowledge of a person skilled in the art.


During the course of the method, a green tire comprising the beads 24, the sidewalls 22 and the carcass reinforcement 32, in this instance the carcass ply 34, is formed.


In a first embodiment of the method, the knit 44 is embedded in its elastomer matrix so as to obtain the additional ply 43, for example by calendering the knit 44 between two skim strips of the elastomer matrix. This additional ply 43 is then added to the green tire formed beforehand. Next, the crown reinforcement 14 and the tread 20 are added.


In a second embodiment, a first strip of elastomer matrix is added to the green tire. Then the knit 441 is added to the first strip of elastomer matrix. Then a second strip of elastomer matrix is added to the knit 44. Finally, the crown reinforcement 14 and the tread 20 are added. When the green tire is cured to form the tire 10, the elastomer matrix of the first and second strips flows through the knit 44. Thus the knit 44 is embedded in its elastomer matrix.


In this second embodiment, the knit 44 forms a monolithic ring having an axis of revolution. The ring is radially deformable, namely deformable at right angles to its axis of revolution, between a rest position and a deformed position. Thus the knit 44 is deformed radially from its rest state into its deformed state and then added axially around the green tire in its deformed state, then the knit 44 is released from its deformed state so that the knit tightly encircles the green tire. Once in position on the green tire, the axis of revolution of the monolithic ring is substantially parallel to and coincident with the axis of the tire.


Second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference respectively to FIGS. 5, 6 and 7, 8 and 9, 10 and 11, 12 and 13, 14. Elements similar to those described in the previous embodiment are denoted by identical references.


Unlike the tire according to the first embodiment, the tire according to the second embodiment of FIGS. 5 and 6 is such that the radial distance d2 between the radially inner end P2 of the knit 44 and the radial mid-plane P4 of the annular structure 26 of the bead 24 is greater than 15 mm.


Unlike the tire according to the first embodiment, the tire according to the third embodiment in FIGS. 7 and 8 is such that the radially outer end P1 of the knit 44 is axially on the outside with respect to the axially outer end P3 of the crown ply 18 radially adjacent to the knit 44.


The tire according to the fourth embodiment of FIGS. 9 and 10 comprises two knits 441 and 442, in this instance the knits 44 of the second and third embodiments respectively. Each knit 441 and 442 comprises a radially outer end denoted P11 and P12 respectively, and a radially inner end respectively denoted P21 and P22.


Unlike the tire according to the first embodiment, the tire according to the fifth embodiment in FIGS. 11 and 12 is such that the radially outer end P1 of the knit 44 is axially on the outside with respect to the axially outer end P3 of the crown ply 18 radially adjacent to the knit 44.


Unlike the tire according to the fourth embodiment in FIGS. 9 and 10, the tire of the sixth embodiment in FIGS. 13 and 14 comprises two knits 441, 442, in this instance the knits 44 of the second and third embodiments respectively, arranged axially on the inside of the carcass reinforcement 32.


Comparative Tests


Three tires 101, 102 and 103 according to the invention, and three tires T1, T2 and T3 of the prior art were compared. Each tire 101, 102 and 103, according to the invention, has an architecture identical to that of the tire according to the first embodiment and comprises a knit made up of one or more filamentary elements made of a non-elastomeric material, in this case nylon.


The characteristics of the knits used are described in table 1 (properties relating to maximum force, elongation at break, elongation at 10%, 50% and 100% obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in the standard elastomer matrix), and table 2 (properties relating to the surface density of stitches in accordance with standard NF EN 14971 of 2006) hereinbelow.











TABLE 1









Tire











101
102
103














Nature of the strand
N140/2
N94/2
N140/2


Construction of the knit
Jersey
Welted jersey
Interlocked rib







Main direction X1










Maximum force (N)
3002
1869
4840


Elongation at break (%)
250
129
485


Force at 100% elongation
1444
1535
1413


Force at 50% elongation
903
835
1112


Force at 10% elongation
318
308
530







Transverse direction Z1










Maximum force (N)
1380
1451
2905


Elongation at break (%)
228
225
306


Force at 100% elongation
804
820
1265


Force at 50% elongation
515
435
890


Force at 10% elongation
176
127
345


















TABLE 2









Tire











101
102
103














Nature of the strand
N140/2
N94/2
N140/2


Construction of the knit
Jersey
Welted jersey
Interlocked rib


Method used in standard
B
B
B


NF EN 14971


Measurement face
Technical
Technical right
Technical right



right side
side
side


Mean of individual results
4.1
3
3.6


(columns/cm)


Mean of individual results
6.4
5
5.7


(rows/cm)


Surface density
26
15
21


(stitches/cm2)









The tire T1 is identical to the tires 101, 102 and 103 except that it has no knit. The tire T2 comprises, in addition to the elements of the tire T1, a second carcass ply. The tire T3 is identical to the tire T1 except that its sidewalls have an additional thickness of 10 mm by comparison with that of the sidewalls of the tire T1.


The various tires T1 to T3, 101, 102 and 103 were subjected to a drift thrust Dz test and to a rolling resistance test as described hereinbelow. The mass of each tire T1 to T3, 101, 102 and 103 was also measured.


The results relating to drift thrust and to mass are given to base 100 with respect to the tire T1. Thus, for drift thrust Dz, the greater the extent to which the value is above 100, the better is the drift thrust of the tire tested compared with the tire T1. In the case of mass, the greater the extent to which the value is lower than 100, the heavier the tire tested is in relation to the tire T1.


The results relating to rolling resistance are given to base 100 with respect to the tire T3. The greater the extent to which the value is below 100, the higher the rolling resistance. Obviously, the objective is to get the lowest possible rolling resistance.


To measure the drift thrust Dz, each tire was driven at a constant speed of 80 km/h on a suitable automatic machine (machine of the “flat-track” type marketed by MTS), varying the load denoted “Z”, at a relatively large cornering angle of 8 degrees, and the drift thrust was measured continuously and the cornering stiffness denoted “D” (corrected for the thrust at zero drift) was identified by recording, by way of sensors, the transverse load on the wheel as a function of this load Z; the cornering stiffness is thus obtained. The reported value for Dz is thus obtained for a chosen load here of 482 daN.


The rolling resistance was measured on a dynamometer according to the ISO 87-67 (1992) method.


The results of these tests are collated in table 3 below.

















TABLE 3








T1
T2
T3
101
102
103
























Weight (base 10)
100
93
81
97
96
96



Dz (base 10)
100
101
108
104
105
104



Rolling resistance (base
/
/
100
99
102
101



100)
















It will be noted that the tires 101, 102 and 103 according to the invention have a mass relatively similar to that of the tire T1 and, in any event, lower than that of the tire T2 and especially that of the tire T3. Furthermore, it will be noted that the tires 101, 102 and 103 according to the invention have a cornering stiffness Dz higher than those of the tires T1 et T2. Thus, the tires 101, 102 and 103 according to the invention offer the best compromise between mass and cornering stiffness. Furthermore, the tires 101, 102 and 103 according to the invention have a rolling resistance that is restrained and even improved (in the case of the tires 102 and 103) in comparison with the tire T3.


The invention is not limited to the embodiments described above.


The knit could be arranged in other locations in the tire than those described hereinabove, for example in the crown reinforcement, radially on the outside of the working plies or even in a low region, for example in the bead.


It may also be possible to combine the features of the various embodiments described or envisaged above, as long as these are compatible with one another.

Claims
  • 1. A tire having at least one knit comprising: columns of loops, the loops of one and the same column being arranged one after the other substantially in an overall direction referred to as the main direction;rows of loops, the loops of one and the same row being arranged one beside the other substantially in an overall direction referred to as the transverse direction; andthe knit having, in the main overall direction and/or the transverse overall direction, a force at 100% elongation greater than or equal to 250 N, the force at 100% elongation being determined from a force-elongation curve obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix.
  • 2. The tire according to the preceding claim 1, wherein the knit has, in the main overall direction and/or the transverse overall direction, a force at 50% elongation greater than or equal to 170 N, prcfcrably 300 N, the force at 50% elongation being determined from a force-elongation curve obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in the standard elastomer matrix.
  • 3. The tire according to claim 1, wherein the knit has, in the main overall direction and/or the transverse overall direction, a maximum force greater than or equal to 800 N, the maximum force being measured in accordance with standard ISO 13934-1:2013 applied to the knit embedded in the standard elastomer matrix.
  • 4. The tire according to claim 1, wherein the knit has, in the main overall direction and/or the transverse overall direction, an elongation at break greater than or equal to 30%, the elongation at break being measured in accordance with standard ISO 13934-1:2013 applied to the knit embedded in the standard elastomer matrix.
  • 5. The tire according to claim 1, wherein the knit has, in the main overall direction and/or the transverse overall direction, an elongation at break less than or equal to 550%, the elongation at break being measured in accordance with standard ISO 13934-1:2013 applied to the knit embedded in the standard elastomer matrix.
  • 6. The tire according to claim 1, wherein the knit has, in the main overall direction and/or the transverse overall direction, a force at 100% elongation that is greater than or equal to 300 N, the force at 100% elongation being determined from a force-elongation curve obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in the standard elastomer matrix.
  • 7. The tire according to claim 1, wherein: the force at 100% elongation of the knit in the main direction, determined from a force-elongation curve obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in the standard elastomer matrix, is greater than or equal to 250 N, andthe force at 100% elongation of the knit in the transverse direction, determined from a force-elongation curve obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in the standard elastomer matrix, is greater than or equal to 120 N.
  • 8. The tire according to claim 1, wherein: the force at 50% elongation of the knit in the main direction, determined from a force-elongation curve obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in the standard elastomer matrix, is greater than or equal to 170 N, andthe force at 50% elongation of the knit in the transverse direction, determined from a force-elongation curve obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in the standard elastomer matrix, is greater than or equal to 80 N.
  • 9. The tire according to claim 1, wherein: the elongation at break of the knit in the main direction measured in accordance with standard ISO 13934-1:2013 applied to the knit embedded in the standard elastomer matrix is less than or equal to 550%, andthe elongation at break of the knit in the transverse direction measured in accordance with standard ISO 13934-1:2013 applied to the knit embedded in the standard elastomer matrix is less than or equal to 1000%.
  • 10. The tire according to claim 1, wherein: the elongation at break of the knit in the main direction measured in accordance with standard ISO 13934-1:2013 applied to the knit embedded in the standard elastomer matrix is greater than or equal to 100%, andthe elongation at break of the knit in the transverse direction measured in accordance with standard ISO 13934-1:2013 applied to the knit embedded in the standard elastomer matrix is greater than or equal to 160%.
  • 11. The tire according to claim 1, wherein: the maximum force of the knit in the main direction measured in accordance with standard ISO 13934-1:2013 applied to the knit embedded in the standard elastomer matrix is greater than or equal to 1800 N, andthe maximum force of the knit in the transverse direction measured in accordance with standard ISO 13934-1:2013 applied to the knit embedded in the standard elastomer matrix is greater than or equal to 800 N.
  • 12. The tire according to claim 1, wherein the knit is made up of one or more filamentary elements of a non-elastomeric material.
  • 13. The tire according to claim 1, comprising a carcass reinforcement anchored in two beads and surmounted radially by a crown reinforcement itself surmounted by a tread which is connected to the beads by two sidewalls, each sidewall comprising the knit.
  • 14. The tire according to claim 13, wherein the radially outer end of the knit is axially on the inside with respect to the axially outer end of a crown ply radially adjacent to the knit.
  • 15. (canceled)
  • 16. The tire according to claim 13, wherein the radially outer end of the knit is interposed radially between the carcass reinforcement and the crown reinforcement.
  • 17. The tire according to claim 13, wherein the carcass reinforcement is anchored in each bead by being turned up around an annular structure of the bead so as to form a main strand and a turnup.
  • 18. (canceled)
  • 19. Method of manufacturing a tire with a knit comprising: arranging columns of loops, with the loops of one and the same column being arranged one after the other substantially in an overall direction referred to as the main direction;arranging rows of loops, with the loops of one and the same row being arranged one beside the other substantially in an overall direction referred to as the transverse direction;providing the knit having, in the main overall direction and/or the transverse overall direction, with a force at 100% elongation greater than or equal to 250 N, the force at 100% elongation being determined from a force-elongation curve obtained by applying standard ISO 13934-1:2013 to the knit embedded in a standard elastomer matrix by way of reinforcing element for a tire; andembedding the knit in an elastomer matrix.
  • 20. (canceled)
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
1363594 Dec 2013 FR national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/EP2014/075757 11/27/2014 WO 00