The present invention relates to tires, and, in particular, to a pneumatic tire which is mounted on a safety rim and which is inflated by a plurality of individual balls.
For off-road vehicles, it is desirable to have low tire pressure in order to have better traction and higher speeds. However, if the tire pressure is reduced enough to obtain the desired traction, there is a severe risk of rim and tube damage when the tire hits a bump or other irregularity. Failure of the rim or a flat tire will prevent the competitor from finishing the event. Flat tires are a common cause of poor competitive performance by an otherwise capable competitor. In recent years, the more financially able competitors have adopted the use of foam tire inserts to replace conventional “inner” tubes. While these inserts solve the problem of flat tire failure, they can decompose and cause underinflated tires. They also create poorer traction due to the apparent high inflation pressure when compared to conventional inner tube/tire combinations at the normal inflation pressures. They are also expensive and have a very limited useful life. Therefore, while foam tire inserts perform a useful function, they do not fully solve the problems encountered in the art.
Individual balls have been used to support a tire in the past. Our research found patents between the years 1890 and 1921 that taught the use of individual balls to support a tire. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 442,393 “Richwine” shows a tire A, which surrounds balls E and which is laced onto studs C on the rim. Most of those prior art balls were solid or thick-walled, relying on the stiffness of the material of the ball to provide support to the tire. Later, around 1920, tires were developed using inner tubes, and the use of internal balls inside a tire was abandoned. These newer types of tires generally required the tire to be installed onto a two-piece rim in a deflated state. Once the tire was installed on the rim, it was inflated. While this type of tire provided a softer, more comfortable ride than was possible with the earlier tires, the two-piece rim was dangerous, and people occasionally were injured when the rim came apart under pressure. Around the early 1940s, the safety rim came into use. This was a one-piece rim with internal recesses that received the edges of the tire. The edges of the tire seated against the rim along those internal recesses. The use of these safety rims is now the norm, with the tire being installed onto the safety rim and then inflated, either with or without the use of an inner tube.
The present invention re-introduces the long-abandoned use of balls, but puts the balls into a modern tire assembly using a safety rim. In addition, the balls that are used in the preferred embodiments of the present invention have characteristics that are different from the balls that were used in the very early tires, as they do not rely on thick, heavy walls to support the load but rather rely upon the internal pressure in a relatively thin-walled ball. In the present invention, balls are put inside a standard modern tire, and the tire is then mounted onto a standard safety rim. This is contrary to the teachings of the art, in which the standard tire is mounted onto the standard safety rim in a deflated state, and, only after being mounted onto the rim, is the tire inflated. However, this new combination achieves benefits that were not available either to the early 20th century ball-type tires, or to the late 20th century pneumatic tires mounted on a safety rim.
By mounting the tire on a safety rim, with inflated balls inside, the present invention obtains all the benefits of modern tires, plus many additional benefits. First, the balls within the tire of the present invention can be inflated to a lower pressure than a regular tire, so as to obtain improved traction, without risking damage to the tire or rim. Second, the design of the present invention greatly reduces the probability of a flat tire.
The reason the balls can be inflated to a lower pressure without increasing the risk of damage to the tire and rim is that this arrangement acts like a built-in progressive suspension. The harder the tire hits a surface, the greater the internal pressure in the balls adjacent to the area in contact with the ground. When a portion of the tire hits a surface, the force tends to deform the ball supporting that portion of the tire, which increases the internal pressure in that particular ball. Thus, that particular ball is suddenly resisting additional distortion with a higher internal pressure, thereby protecting the tire and rim from damage. This differs from a normal tire, in which the internal pressure does not increase substantially, because the air simply shifts within the large internal volume of the tire. For example, for a motorcycle tire assembly made in accordance with the present invention, the balls may be run at 3–5 pounds of pressure, as opposed to typical inner tube tires that are run at 12–18 pounds of pressure, without increasing the risk of damage to the tire and rim. The balls also can be used in a wide temperature range and are very durable.
The design of the present invention also protects against flat tires, because, if an individual ball is punctured and deflated, or even if several of the balls are punctured and deflated, the tire is still inflated sufficiently to continue to function. This is true even under extreme temperature conditions, where inserts fail. A punctured ball can then simply be replaced without having to replace the remaining balls.
A rim lock may be used to help hold the tire bead onto the rim and to help prevent shifting of the balls during operation of the tire.
Between the rim 14 and the tire 12 are individual balls 18. The balls have a diameter and extend radially to span the space from the tire edges to the tread area of the tire, so that a single layer of balls substantially fills the empty space between the rim 14 and the tire 12. The number, size, and shape of the balls 18 are selected depending upon the dimensions of the tire 12 and rim 14. While this view shows the ball 18 as having a substantially spherical shape, that is due to the fact that this particular tire casing 12 and rim 14 together form a void space with a substantially circular cross-section. If the rim 14 were substantially wider than the height of the tire casing, or if the height of the tire casing were substantially taller than the width of the rim, then the balls 18 preferably would have a more elliptical shape. Also, a more elliptical shape may be desirable in order to fit the desired number of balls into the tire, as will be explained later. The balls 18 preferably are made of a material that does not stretch significantly, so the surface area of the ball does not increase appreciably as the internal pressure of the gas inside the ball increases.
In the case of balls to be used in off-road motorcycles, the ball should be able to withstand five times the weight of the motorcycle and rider without exceeding its elastic limit, without exceeding its tensile limit, and without stretching more than 50% from its initial surface area. Since it is desirable to make the balls lightweight, it is also desirable to make the wall of the ball as thin as possible while still meeting the other design criteria.
The balls that have been successfully tested for off-road motorcycle use are made of polyether-based polyurethane sheet that is 0.050 inches thick (50 mils), welded together as shown in
It is estimated that balls for automobile tires would be from four to eight inches in diameter and 30–100 mils thick, while able to support 25,000 pounds without exceeding elastic and tensile limits and without stretching beyond 150% of their initial surface area before loading.
In order to define the balls in more general terms, it is preferred that the balls be able to support a force in pounds that is at least one hundred times the cube of their diameter in inches without exceeding their tensile and elastic limits and without stretching beyond 150% of their initial surface area. Also, it is preferred that the wall thickness be less than 3% of the diameter, and more preferably less than 2% of the diameter. So, for example, for a ball that is three inches in diameter, it preferably should be able to support at least 2700 pounds (3×3×3×100) without exceeding its tensile and elastic limits and without stretching to more than 150% of its initial surface area. It preferably should also have a wall thickness less than 0.09 inches (3% of 3), and more preferably less than 0.06 inches (2% of 3). For a ball that is five inches in diameter, it preferably should be able to support at least 12,500 pounds (5×5×5×100) without exceeding its tensile and elastic limits and without stretching to more than 150% of its initial surface area. It preferably should also have a wall thickness less than 0.15 inches (3% of 5) and more preferably less than 0.10 inches (2% of 5).
While rotational molding and welding of sheets have already been disclosed, it is also possible to make the balls by injection molding. Also, reinforcing materials, such as fibers could be incorporated. Further research will no doubt disclose even better materials and fabrication technologies, which will also be within the scope of the present invention.
As shown in
Assembling the tire 12 onto the rim 14 is shown in
An alternative embodiment is shown in
While the preferred embodiment of the invention, as shown in
Looking at
While the tire assemblies shown herein support the hub on spokes and are intended to be used on a motorcycle, many other known types of hubs could be used, and the resulting tire assemblies could be used on a wide variety of vehicles, including automobiles, trucks, airplanes, and so forth.
The preferred embodiments described above are understood simply to be examples of what the inventor believes to be the best way of carrying out the invention. Applicant has not attempted to show herein every possible version of the invention that is intended to be protected by the claims, as this would be impossible, and it is not required in order to obtain a patent that protects the full scope of the invention. While some alternatives have been mentioned in this specification, it would be obvious to those skilled in the art to make many other modifications to these embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention. Therefore, these examples should not be considered to add any limitations that are not intended by the plain meaning of the words of the claims, unless the words in the claims have clearly been given a special definition herein.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/215,256, filed Jun. 30, 2000.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
442393 | Richwine | Dec 1890 | A |
459614 | Richwine | Sep 1891 | A |
475785 | Mason | May 1892 | A |
487419 | Lee | Dec 1892 | A |
492280 | Fisher | Feb 1893 | A |
575797 | Welch | Jan 1897 | A |
584498 | Ettinger | Jun 1897 | A |
601055 | Greaves | Mar 1898 | A |
627616 | Hill | Jun 1899 | A |
856411 | Mains | Jun 1907 | A |
857281 | Hogben | Jun 1907 | A |
912917 | Summers | Feb 1909 | A |
952675 | Krum | Mar 1910 | A |
963320 | Peck | Jul 1910 | A |
967506 | Evans | Aug 1910 | A |
1000165 | Fischer | Aug 1911 | A |
1185660 | Harris | Jun 1916 | A |
1243513 | Grubb | Oct 1917 | A |
1332953 | Richards | Mar 1920 | A |
1373111 | Young | Mar 1921 | A |
1424360 | Jacobs | Aug 1922 | A |
1654567 | Wolfrom | Jan 1928 | A |
2070066 | Picardi | Feb 1937 | A |
2143471 | Booharin | Jan 1939 | A |
3127920 | Hercules | Apr 1964 | A |
3208497 | Schutt | Sep 1965 | A |
3381735 | Talcott et al. | May 1968 | A |
3981342 | Farber et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
3993114 | Hinderks | Nov 1976 | A |
4008743 | Welch | Feb 1977 | A |
4013111 | Powell | Mar 1977 | A |
4037635 | Ippen et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4037636 | Hagenbohmer et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4051883 | Ippen et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4057090 | Hoshikawa et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4064922 | Farber et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4090546 | Honda et al. | May 1978 | A |
4094353 | Ford | Jun 1978 | A |
4109695 | Miyazato | Aug 1978 | A |
4113799 | Van Ornum et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4116895 | Kageyama et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4120337 | Soma et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4130144 | Harris | Dec 1978 | A |
4149579 | Senger | Apr 1979 | A |
4161202 | Powell et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4164250 | Shichman | Aug 1979 | A |
4177849 | Osada et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4183390 | Hallman | Jan 1980 | A |
4186042 | Powell et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4197893 | O'Coin | Apr 1980 | A |
4213491 | Pope et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4214619 | Bowerman, Jr. et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4216812 | Bourne | Aug 1980 | A |
4228839 | Bohm et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4231407 | James | Nov 1980 | A |
4237952 | Chautard et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4239076 | Chautard et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4254810 | Shichman | Mar 1981 | A |
4257467 | Van der Burg | Mar 1981 | A |
4262624 | Soeda et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4287928 | Hallman | Sep 1981 | A |
4294730 | Kenney | Oct 1981 | A |
4318435 | Heath-Coleman | Mar 1982 | A |
4356214 | Soeda et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4371023 | Campagna | Feb 1983 | A |
4493355 | Ippen et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4665963 | Timar et al. | May 1987 | A |
4884609 | Ho | Dec 1989 | A |
4945965 | Kim | Aug 1990 | A |
5031679 | Shoner | Jul 1991 | A |
5073444 | Shanelee | Dec 1991 | A |
5180455 | Cheng | Jan 1993 | A |
5244026 | Yasushi | Sep 1993 | A |
5301729 | Blair | Apr 1994 | A |
5361817 | Chen | Nov 1994 | A |
5385191 | Aflague et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5679184 | Hosking | Oct 1997 | A |
5685925 | Riquier et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5693161 | Ho | Dec 1997 | A |
5795414 | Shih | Aug 1998 | A |
5874138 | Fitzpatrick | Feb 1999 | A |
6213179 | Igarashi | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6269857 | Kanai et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6401773 | Cho | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6401774 | Rooney | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6500286 | Ishikawa et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6539994 | Ruffa | Apr 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
07-228111 | Feb 1994 | JP |
1001652 | Nov 1995 | NL |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60215256 | Jun 2000 | US |