The present invention relates to air pressure loss detection in one or more tires of a vehicle.
During the operation of a vehicle, significant loss of pressure in one or more tires may cause the driver to lose control of the vehicle or a tire failure. Moreover, event slight pressure losses in a tire can result in reduced service life for that tire. Therefore, it is desirable to be able to inform the driver that one or more tires are losing pressure, especially before hazardous conditions are reached.
Certain systems measure the pressure of each tire directly and relay this information to the driver. Other systems measure changes in the effective rolling diameter of the tires caused by losses in pressure or its response to road induced vibration. Yet in other systems the rotational velocities of the tires are measured under certain operating situations to identify conditions of the tires. For instance, loss of air in a tire may cause an increase in rotational resistance of the tire, and hence a perceptible change in the tire rotational velocity.
As a vehicle maneuvers over a road surface, ground excitation generates angular speed variations or torsional vibration of one or more wheels of the vehicle caused by for-aft displacements of the wheels. The frequency of the speed variations depends on the tire sidewall stiffness, which is mainly influenced by the tire pressure. The angular speed variation of a wheel shifts from a higher frequency to a lower frequency at a given speed when there is tire pressure loss.
In accordance with the invention, the loss of pressure in one or more tires is monitored by detecting the angular speed variations of one or more wheels of the vehicle and analyzing the frequency of the speed variations over a specified wheel revolution period. Changes in the frequency are related to pressure loss in one or more tires, which is indicated to the driver, for example, by displaying the tire pressure loss information on a display.
Other features and advantages will be apparent from the following drawings, detailed description, and claims.
The following terminology is helpful for understanding various aspects of the present invention:
During the operation of a vehicle, for example, ground excitation generates torsional vibration or angular speed variations of one or more wheels or other powertrain components of the vehicle, such as the axles of the driven wheels. For example, in
In accordance with various embodiments of the invention, a process or algorithm (see, e.g.,
Referring now to
A function is sampled at every spaced interval angle and the Fourier Transform is applied in the angular domain s(Ω), which is a function of the inverse angle θ (i.e., Ω=1/θ) expressed in cycles per 2π radian (i.e. cycles/2π), as given by the expression
The Fourier integral transforms can be rewritten for discrete sample data systems. In the angular domain, Θ is the sampling angle and N is the number of samples taken during a period of Θ. In general, Θ is chosen as a multiple of 2π radian. Accordingly, the spectrum is given by the expression:
where the angle interval Δθ is considered a constant value, namely,
and the rotation angle is
θ=n Δθ (4)
The angular frequency resolution is provided by the expression
where the angular frequency Ω is represented as m ΔΩ. Accordingly, the Fourier integral transforms a discrete sampled angular domain to the angular frequency domain in units of cycles/2π.
The spaced interval in time Δtn represents a period of time during the nth rotation of Δθ, and Δtn in general is not a constant because of the variations of the angular velocity of a given wheel.
If the sequence of sampled values is
r(nΔθ)=Δtn (6)
then from equation (2), the DFFT algorithm uses the following expression which applies equally to series of angles in real space:
Here, a contribution of spaced interval in time Δtn is Δtn e−j2πmn/N.
For the analysis of the torsional vibration, the sampling length N is calculated by the equation:
A continuous contribution of each encoder flank Δtn (n=0,1,2,3, . . . , N−1) to all the predefined frequencies is Δtn×e−j2πmn/N M=0, 1, 2, . . . , M−1. Note that, in general, more than one encoder flank is rotated during a software loop, and all the contributions of these encoder flanks to the spectrum are completed within the same software loop.
In equation (2) the task of calculating the frequency spectrum is divided into N sub-tasks Δtn×e−j2πmn/N N=0, 1, 2, . . . , N−1. Hence, the total contribution for Δtn (n=0,1,2,3, . . . , N−1) creates a single angular frequency spectrum:
The total tics
are accumulated to calculate an angular velocity ω.
Rewriting equation (7) in complex space, the frequency spectrum is given by:
and the amplitude of the angular frequency is:
Note that the pitch of the teeth around the encoder tone wheel circumference is not constant because of variations in manufacturing tolerances, and therefore unbalanced variations for every revolution of tire occurs. Frequencies associated with these variations are referred to as pole pitch frequencies, and a pole pitch error is defined as the maximum tolerance on the teeth of the encoder tone wheel.
As the tire rotates, the pitch error will periodically create additional vibration in the frequency spectrum. These additional frequencies make it more difficult to find a peak torsional vibration in the angular domain. Therefore, in accordance with the invention, the pole pitch frequencies of the single spectrum are eliminated before proceeding with the detection algorithm or process.
Specifically, in the angular domain, pole pitch vibration occurs where the angular frequency Ω is equal to a multiple of cycles/2π radian. Although there is no relation between pole pitch vibration and the vehicle speed in the angular domain, it is easier to eliminate pole pitch vibration in the angular domain than in the time domain because the vibration occurs at fixed angular frequencies in the angular domain.
Although the spectrum in
f Hz=Ω(cycles/2π radian)×ω(2π radian/sec) (11)
where
As can be seen
Curve-fitting is then applied to the series of averaged frequency spectra. Specifically, a peak torsional vibration frequency F0 (cycles/2π) in the angular domain is curve fitted according to the expression:
and
xm=mΔΩ
ym=Sp(mΔΩ) m=M1,M1+1, . . . ,M2−1 (16)
The range of the curve-fitting is determined by the values of M1 and M2, which are functions of the angular velocity ω.
A ‘BAD’ spectrum is rejected if the fitted curve regresses to a straight line (i.e., if Δa≅0), if the peak position is out of the pre-defined range, or if the calculation overflows.
As mentioned above, it is more convenient to characterize vehicle vibrations in the time frequency domain rather than in the angular frequency domain. Therefore, after calculating the peak torsional vibration from the frequency spectrum, the process maps the peak torsional vibration from angular domain to the time domain. That is, the process continues to calculate a series of frequency observations and determines an initial torsional frequency (f0) in the time frequency domain based on the observations. Specifically, the peak torsional vibration is mapped to the frequency domain (Hz) according to:
f0=F0×ω0 (17a)
For example, assuming Θ=2π×I and the tic time is μ=4×10−6 sec, then the angular velocity is
where I is a predefined number of sampling cycles.
After calculating the initial frequency, the process makes adjustments to the frequency over time. Even if the vehicle changes speed, the process continues to calculate the single spectrum, the averaging spectrum, and the peak of angular frequency in the angular domain and maps the peak Fi in the angular domain to the time domain fi(i=1,2,3, . . . ) by the aforementioned process, that is,
fi=Fi×ωi, i=1,2,3, . . . , I, (18)
A filtering calculation is also applied to the series of observed values. Moreover, when i reaches the predefined value I, the process outputs and continues to update the peak frequency of the torsional vibration in real time.
The aforementioned process is able to detect pressure losses in more than one tire, since, for example, tire pressure loss in the front left tire causes vibration shifting in that tire but does not impact the performance of the front right tire and vice versa. Similarly, vibration of the rear left tire is isolated from the vibration of the rear right tire and vice versa.
As an example, the process was implemented in a front-wheel drive vehicle driven on a rough road at about 60 kph, in which the tire pressure of the front right tire was 2.3 bars and that of the rear right tire was 2.1 bars. The tire pressure of the front left and rear left tires were changed to 1.5 bars, 1.9 bars, and 2.5 bars. As shown in
Note also in
The above described process is illustrated in
In step 208, after creating the single spectrum, the process 200 eliminates the pole pitch error and in step 210 combines the continuous single spectra to an averaging spectrum in the angular domain. In step 212, the process 200 curve fits the averaged spectrum and maps the peak frequency of the curve-fitted spectrum from the angular domain to the time domain in step 214. Subsequently, the process 200 filters the peak frequency and makes long-term adjustments to the peak frequency over time in step 216. As mentioned above, the process 200 continues to calculate the torsional vibration frequency, even when the vehicle speed changes, and applies statistical analysis to the series of observed data to extract the best value of the estimated frequency. This update is used to detect the shift in the torsional vibration frequency, which is related to the tire pressure loss of one or more tires in step 218. The results are displayed in step 220, and the analysis subsequently ends.
Other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4574267 | Jones | Mar 1986 | A |
5541573 | Jones | Jul 1996 | A |
5588721 | Asano et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5712616 | Schmitt et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
6374163 | Lou et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385553 | Naito et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6450020 | Naito et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6510375 | Faye | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6550320 | Giustino | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6725136 | Lutz et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 695 653 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0 578 826 | Jul 1998 | EP |
WO 0187647 | Nov 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050171723 A1 | Aug 2005 | US |