Tire wall gauges to optimize runflat tire ride comfort

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6719029
  • Patent Number
    6,719,029
  • Date Filed
    Friday, August 9, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 13, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
Runflat tire construction is optimized for tire ride comfort by reducing tire wall gauges in the tread-shoulder-to-upper-sidewall transition region and compensating with supporting sidewalls that constantly increase in thickness (gauge) from the transition region to a bead/flange area where a chafer extends above a wheel rim flange. Thus the bead and lower sidewall area are reinforced to a maximum and the shoulder area gets only the minimum stiffness necessary to achieve the required runflat performance. Within the context of wall gauges that constantly increase from the transition region to the bead/flange area, a mid-sidewall gauge ratio MSGR, being equal to a mid-sidewall gauge G2 divided by a shoulder gauge G1, is approximately within the range of 1.1 to 1.4, preferably approximately equal to 1.3; and a bead/flange gauge ratio BFGR, being equal to a bead/flange gauge G3 divided by a shoulder gauge G1, is approximately within the range of 1.5 to 1.8, preferably approximately equal to 1.7.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to the design of pneumatic, radial ply, runflat passenger tires.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Various methods have been devised for enabling the safe continued operation of unpressurized or underpressurized vehicle tires with the intent of minimizing further damage to the uninflated tire and without simultaneously compromising vehicle handling over a distance from the place where the tire has lost its pressure to a place desired by the driver, such as a service station where the tire can be changed. Loss of tire pressure can result from a variety of causes, including puncture by a foreign object such as a nail or other sharp object piercing the pneumatic tire installed on a vehicle.




Pneumatic tires designed for sustained operation under conditions of unpressurization or underpressurization are also called runflat tires, as they are capable of being driven in the uninflated, or what would generally be called “flat,” condition. The conventional pneumatic tire collapses upon itself when it is uninflated and is carrying the weight of a vehicle. The tire's sidewalls buckle outward in the circumferential portion of the tire where the tread contacts the ground, making the tire “flat.”




The term “runflat” is generally used to describe a tire that is designed such that the tire structure alone, in particular the structure of the sidewalls, has sufficient rigidity and strength to support the vehicle load when the tire is operated without being inflated. The sidewalls and internal surfaces of the tire do not collapse or buckle onto themselves, and the tire does not otherwise contain or use other supporting structures or devices to prevent the tire from collapsing.




An early example of a runflat tire design is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,111,249, entitled the “Banded Tire,” in which a hoop or annular band approximately as wide as the tread is circumferentially deployed beneath the tread. The hoop in combination with the rest of the tire structure could support the vehicle weight in the uninflated condition.




Another approach taken has been simply to strengthen the sidewalls by increasing their cross-sectional thickness. However, due to the large amounts of rubber required to stiffen the sidewall members, flexure heating becomes a major factor in tire failure during runflat operation. This is especially so when the tire is operated for high speeds in the uninflated condition. Pirelli discloses such a runflat tire design in European Patent Publication No. 0-475-258A1.




In general, runflat tires incorporate sidewalls that are thicker and/or stiffer so that the tire's load can be carried by an uninflated tire with minimum adverse effects upon the tire itself and upon vehicle handling until such reasonable time as the tire can be repaired or replaced. The typical methods used in sidewall thickening and stiffening include the incorporation of circumferentially disposed wedge inserts in the inner peripheral surface of the sidewall portion of the carcass, which is the region in the tire usually having the lowest resistance to deformation under vertical loading. In such runflat tire designs, each sidewall is thickened in such a way that its overall thickness (gauge) is increased in the region between the bead and the tread shoulder.




The reinforced sidewalls of such tires, when operated in the uninflated condition, experience a net compressive load in the region of the sidewall that is closest to the road-contacting portion of the tire. Also, the bending stresses on the sidewalls are such that the outer portions of the reinforced sidewalls experience tensile forces while the inner portions experience compression stresses during runflat operation.




A Goodyear patent U.S. Pat. No. 5,368,082, by Oare et al, ('082), which has a common assignee and is incorporated in its entirety by reference herein, discloses a low aspect ratio runflat pneumatic radial ply tire which employs special sidewall inserts to improve stiffness. Approximately six additional pounds of weight per tire was required to support an 800 pound load in this uninflated tire. This earlier invention, although superior to prior attempts at runflat tire design, still imposed a weight penalty that could be offset by the elimination of a spare tire and the tire jack. However, this weight penalty becomes even more problematic in the design of tires having higher aspect ratios.




U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,427,166 and 5,511,599 of Walter L. Willard, Jr., disclose the addition of a third ply and the addition of a third insert in the sidewall of a tire to further increase the runflat performance of the tire over that of the U.S. Pat. No. 5,368,082 Oare et al. These two latter patents discuss some of the load relations that occur in the uninflated condition of the tire and they demonstrate that the Oare et al. concept can be applied to additional numbers of plies and inserts.




In general, runflat tire design is predicated upon the installation of reinforcing inserts inside each sidewall flex area. The inserts in each sidewall, in combination with the plies, add rigidity to the sidewalls in the absence of air pressure during runflat operation. The '082 Patent teaches a sidewall construction for runflat tires in which the tire is constructed with two plies, an inner liner and two reinforcing wedge inserts in each sidewall. The two inserts in each sidewall are disposed such that one insert is located between the two plies while the other insert is located between the inner liner and the first or innermost ply.




While the high resistance to compression deflection of the inserts provides the necessary resistance to the collapse of the uninflated loaded tire, the use of multiple plies and, in each sidewall, more than one reinforcing wedge insert, has drawbacks which include the above mentioned increase in tire weight and flexure-induced heat build up. Such designs also increase the tire's complexity in ways that adversely affect manufacturing and quality control.




U.S. Pat. No. 3,464,477 of Henri Verdier, and assigned to Michelin Corporation, discloses a pneumatic tire particularly for off-highway (OTR) use wherein the inflated tire is to be protected against damage such as cuts and abrasion to the sidewalls when the tire is used on rocky or rough ground. Although this is not a runflat design, there are useful teachings presented since the inventor has determined that sidewall damage from such OTR operation can be ameliorated by reinforcing the tire sidewalls: “surprisingly . . . the sidewalls should be reinforced inwardly of the carcass plies.” The disclosed reinforcement of each sidewall is a single reinforcing wedge insert (“elastomeric reinforcement”) which has a maximum thickness at the mid height of the sidewall of the tire between about 1% and 3% of the overall maximum width of the tire, the reinforcement tapering toward its edges, that is toward the tread and toward the corresponding head of the sidewall and extending about half of the height of the tire.




While a high resistance to compressive deflection of the inserts provides the necessary resistance to collapse of the uninflated loaded tire, the use of multiple plies and more than one reinforcing wedge insert in each sidewall has drawbacks which include the increase in tire weight and cyclical-flexure-induced heating.




In the interests of operating efficiency and performance when operating with the tire normally inflated, the modifications to the sidewall and other areas of the tire for providing runflat operation should not adversely interact with the normal inflated operation of the tire. However, as the structure of the sidewall is stiffened with inserts and additional plies to provide runflat operation, some of the desirable operational characteristics of the tire in its inflated state are compromised.




The weight of additional sidewall plies and inserts resists the ability of the automobile suspension to allow the wheel to move in response to variations in the road surface. The increase in stiffness of the sidewall reduces the ability of the tire to comply with variations in the road surface. Both the increase in weight and radial stiffness may degrade the ride comfort and quality increasing harshness and noise perceived by the driver. Increases in tire weight associated with additional plies and inserts will also tend to reduce the performance of the automobile in straight line acceleration and deceleration. The increase in tire weight also tends to increase fuel consumption.




Clearly, the goal in runflat tire design is to provide a low-cost, light-weight tire that gives good runflat vehicle handling as well as good service life during runflat operation without compromising the durability, efficiency or performance of the tire during normal fully inflated operation.




The sidewalls of a fully inflated, conventional tire are thin, light weight and flexible compared to the sidewall of a runflat tire. The flexibility of the sidewall allows the tread area to move radially inward to allow the tire to absorb bumps. As a portion of tread area moves radially inward, the adjacent sidewall radius of curvature is decreased as the sidewall bulges out. This bending of the sidewall results in a relatively small amount of bending stress because the conventional sidewall is thin. Under normal inflated operation, radial deflection is resisted by the compressive force of the air in the tire. The compressed air provides a resistance to radial deflection that is more than proportional to the deflection. For example a 10% increase in radial deflection will require more than a 10% increase in the load. In effect, the overall modulus of elasticity of a conventional tire with respect to radial deflection is not constant but increases as the deflection decreases the volume of air contained by the tire.




The reinforced sidewalls of runflat tires resist the radial deflection with a combination of compressive and bending stresses in the inflated as well as the uninflated condition. Runflat fires experience a net compressive load in the region of the sidewall closest to the road-contacting portion of the tread. Also, the bending stresses on the thickened sidewalls are such that the outer portions of the sidewalls experience tensile forces while the inner portions experience compression stresses. Thus in addition to providing the structural rigidity required for runflat operation, the reinforced sidewalls of most runflat designs also reduce the desirable radial flexibility of the tire in the inflated condition. Accordingly, the reinforced sidewalls of runflat tires tend to detract from riding comfort, due to the increased structural rigidity of the tire.




It is apparent that there is a need to develop a runflat tire structure that provides the necessary structural rigidity in the uninflated condition, while also providing sufficient radial flexibility to optimize ride and handling characteristics in the normal inflated condition.




BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to a pneumatic radial ply runflat tire comprising a tread cap, two inextensible annular beads, a carcass comprising a radial ply structure, a gas-impervious inner liner, a belt structure located between the tread cap and the radial ply structure, two sidewalls each of which is reinforced with one or more wedge inserts, a pair of transition regions wherein the tread cap smoothly transitions into each sidewall, a pair of bead filler apexes, and a pair of chafers that protect the underlying ply structure from abrasion against a wheel rim having a rim flange. In a first embodiment, the runflat tire of the present invention has a radial ply structure that comprises at least two plies, and has at least two pairs of sidewall wedge inserts. In a second embodiment, the runflat tire of the present invention has a radial ply structure that comprises a single ply, and has one pair of sidewall wedge inserts. The invention can be generalized such that its scope includes all runflat tires having sidewalls with increased gauges (wall thicknesses) due to stiffening inserts and/or other stiffening devices such as fabric strips.




According to the present invention, the embodiments of the pneumatic radial ply runflat tire are characterized by tire wall gauges that constantly increase in thickness from the transition region to a bead/flange area where the chafer extends axially outward over the rim flange when the tire is mounted on the wheel rim.




According to the present invention, the embodiments of the pneumatic radial ply runflat tire may be further characterized by: a tire wall gauge being a shoulder gauge, measured in the middle of the transition regions; a tire wall gauge being a bead/flange gauge, measured immediately radially outward of the portion of the chafer that contacts the wheel rim flange; and a bead/flange gauge ratio, being defined as the bead/flange gauge divided by the shoulder gauge; wherein the bead/flange gauge ratio is within the range of 1.5 to 1.8 and preferably is approximately equal to 1.7. The embodiments of the pneumatic radial ply runflat tire may be further characterized by: a tire wall gauge being a mid-sidewall gauge, measured at the middle of the section height of the sidewall; and a mid-sidewall gauge ratio, being defined as the mid-sidewall gauge divided by the shoulder gauge; wherein the mid-sidewall gauge ratio is within the range of 1.1 to 1.4 and preferably is approximately equal to 1.3.




According to the present invention, the embodiments of the pneumatic radial ply runflat tire may be further characterized by a tire wall gauge being a shoulder gauge, measured in the middle of the transition regions; a tire wall gauge being a mid-sidewall gauge, measured at the middle of the section height of the sidewall; and a mid-sidewall gauge ratio, being defined as the mid-sidewall gauge divided by the shoulder gauge; wherein the mid-sidewall gauge ratio is within the range of 1.1 to 1.4 and preferably is approximately equal to 1.3.




Other objects, features and advantages of the invention will become apparent in light of the following description thereof.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




Reference will be made in detail to preferred embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawing figures. The figures are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. Although the invention is generally described in the context of these preferred embodiments, it should be understood that it is not intended to limit the spirit and scope of the invention to these particular embodiments.




Certain elements in selected ones of the drawings may be illustrated not-to-scale, for illustrative clarity. The cross-sectional views, if any, presented herein may be in the form of “slices”, or “near-sighted” cross-sectional views, omitting certain background lines which would otherwise be visible in a true cross-sectional view, for illustrative clarity.




The structure, operation, and advantages of the invention will become further apparent upon consideration of the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:





FIG. 1

is a cross-sectional view of a prior art runflat tire design incorporating multiple wedge inserts in each sidewall and multiple plies in the ply structure;





FIG. 2

is a cross sectional view of a prior art runflat tire design incorporating a single wedge insert in each sidewall and a single ply in the ply structure;





FIG. 3

is a cross sectional view of an embodiment of a runflat tire incorporating two inserts per sidewall and a double ply, and having sidewall gauges in accordance with the present invention; and





FIG. 4

is a cross sectional view of an embodiment of a runflat tire incorporating one insert per sidewall and a single ply, and having sidewall gauges in accordance with the present invention.











DEFINITIONS




“Apex” means an elastomeric filler located radially above the bead core and between the plies and the turnup plies.




“Aspect Ratio” means the ratio of the section height of a tire to its section width; also refers to the cross-sectional profile of the tire; a low-profile tire, for example, has a low aspect ratio.




“Axial” and “Axially” means the lines or directions that are parallel to the axis of rotation of the tire.




“Bead” or “Bead Core” generally means that part of the tire comprising an annular tensile member of radially inner beads that are associated with holding the tire to the rim; the beads being wrapped by ply cords and shaped, with or without other reinforcement elements such as flippers, chippers, apexes or fillers, toe-guards and chafers.




“Belt Structure” or “Reinforcement Belts” or “Belt Package” means at least two annular layers or plies of parallel cords, woven or unwoven, underlying the tread, unanchored to the bead, and having both left and right cord angles in the range from 18° to 30° relative to the equatorial plane of the tire.




“Breakers” or “Tire Breakers” means the same as belt or belt structure or reinforcement belts.




“Carcass” means the tire structure apart from the belt structure, tread, undertread over the plies, but including the beads.




“Casing” means the carcass, belt structure, beads, sidewalls and all other components of the tire excepting the tread and undertread.




“Circumferential” most often means circular lines or directions extending along the perimeter of the surface of the annular tread perpendicular to the axial direction; it can also refer to the direction of the sets of adjacent circular curves whose radii define the axial curvature of the tread, as viewed in cross section.




“Cord” means one of the reinforcement strands, including fibers, with which the plies and belts are reinforced.




“Crown” or “Tire Crown” means the tread, tread shoulders and the immediately adjacent portions of the sidewalls.




“Equatorial Plane” means the plane perpendicular to the tire's axis of rotation and passing through the center of its tread; or the plane containing the circumferential centerline of the tread.




“Footprint” means the contact patch or area of contact of the tire tread with a flat surface at a given speed and under normal load and pressure.




“Gauge” refers to cross-sectional thickness, measured along a line that is normal to at least one surface of what is being measured. For tire wall or sidewall gauges, the thickness is measured along a line that is normal to the innermost surface of the tire wall.




“Inner Liner” means the layer or layers of elastomer or other material that form the inside surface of a tubeless tire and that contain the inflating gas or fluid within the tire.




“Insert” means the crescent- or wedge-shaped reinforcement typically used to reinforce the sidewalls of runflat-type tires; it also refers to the elastomeric non-crescent-shaped insert that underlies the tread.




“Lateral” means a direction parallel to the axial direction.




“Normal Inflation Pressure” means the specific design inflation pressure at a specified load assigned by the appropriate standards organization for the service condition for the tire.




“Normal Load” means the specific design load at a specified inflation pressure assigned by the appropriate standards organization for the service condition for the tire.




“Ply” means a cord-reinforced layer of rubber-coated radially deployed or otherwise parallel cords.




“Radial” and “radially” mean directions radially toward or away from the axis of rotation of the tire.




“Radial Ply Structure” means the one or more carcass plies of which at least one ply has reinforcing cords oriented at an angle of between 65° and 90° with respect to the equatorial plane of the tire.




“Radial Ply Tire” means a belted or circumferentially-restricted pneumatic tire in which at least one ply has cords which extend from bead to bead are laid at cord angles between 65° and 90° with respect to the equatorial plane of the tire.




“Section Height” means the radial distance from the nominal rim diameter to the outer diameter of the tire at its equatorial plane.




“Section Width” means the maximum linear distance parallel to the axis of the tire and between the exterior of its sidewalls when and after it has been inflated at normal pressure for 24 hours, but unloaded, excluding elevations of the sidewalls due to labeling, decoration or protective bands.




“Shoulder” means the upper portion of sidewall just below the tread edge.




“Sidewall” means that portion of a tire between the tread and the bead.




“Tangential” and “Tangentially” refer to segments of circular curves that intersect at a point through which can be drawn a single line that is mutually tangential to both circular segments.




“Toe-guard” refers to the circumferentially deployed elastomeric rim-contacting portion of the tire axially inward of each bead.




“Tread Cap” refers to the tread and the underlying material into which the tread pattern is molded.




“Tread Contour” means the shape of a tire tread as viewed in axial cross section. “Tread width” means the arc length of the tread surface in the plane includes the axis of rotation of the tire.




“Wedge Insert” means the same as “Insert.”




DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




Prior Art Embodiments




With reference to

FIG. 1

, a cross section of a typical multiple-insert prior art pneumatic radial runflat tire


10


is illustrated. The tire


10


has a tread cap


12


, a belt structure


14


comprising belts


24


,


26


, a pair of sidewall portions


16


,


18


, a pair of transition regions


17




a


,


17




b


wherein the tread cap


12


smoothly transitions into the sidewall portions


16


,


18


, respectively, a pair of bead regions


20




a


,


20




b,


a carcass


21


with a ply structure


22


, and a fabric overlay


28


deployed between the bottom portion of the tread cap


12


and the upper parts of the belt structure


14


. The carcass


21


comprises the ply structure


22


having a first ply


30


and second ply


32


, a gas-impervious inner liner


34


, a pair of beads


36




a


,


36




b,


a pair of bead filler apexes


38




a


,


38




b,


a first pair of sidewall wedge inserts


40




a


,


40




b,


and a second pair of sidewall wedge inserts


42




a


,


42




b.


The first or innermost wedge insert


40




a


,


40




b


is located between the inner liner


34


and the first ply


30


, and the second wedge insert


42




a


,


42




b


is located between the first ply


30


and the second ply


32


. The fabric overlay


28


is disposed beneath, or radially inward of, tread cap


12


and on top of, or radially outward from, belt structure


14


. The innermost ply


30


wraps around the beads


36




a


,


36




b


and has turnup ends


46




a


,


46




b


that extend well out into the sidewall portions


16


,


18


, respectively. The reinforced sidewall portions


16


,


18


include chafers


44




a


,


44




b


that protect the underlying ply structure


22


from abrasion against a wheel rim (not shown). The tire


10


has a section height SH indicated on the equatorial plane EP.




The reinforced sidewall portions


16


,


18


of ply structure


22


give the tire


10


a limited runflat capability. As can be seen from

FIG. 1

, the structural reinforcement in the sidewall area of the tire


10


substantially increases the overall thickness of the sidewall portions


16


,


18


, particularly in the middle of the sidewalls


16


,


18


where the wedge inserts


40




a


,


40




b


,


42




a


,


42




b


are thickest. For example, representative sidewall thicknesses may comprise: a shoulder gauge G


1


, measured in the middle of the transition regions


17




a


,


17




b


; a mid-sidewall gauge G


2


, measured at the middle SH/


2


of the section height of the sidewall


16


,


18


; and a bead/flange gauge G


3


, measured in the bead area immediately above (radially outward of) the portion of the bead area


20




a


,


20




b


that contacts a wheel rim flange (not shown). For the purpose of comparing relative tire wall thicknesses, ratios can be defined as follows: a mid-sidewall gauge ratio MSGR being equal to the mid-sidewall gauge G


2


divided by the shoulder gauge G


1


; and a bead/flange gauge ratio BFGR being equal to the bead/flange gauge G


3


divided by the shoulder gauge G


1


. In equation form:








MSGR=G




2


/


G




1












BFGR=G




3


/


G




1








For the exemplary prior art tire


10


illustrated in

FIG. 1

, the sidewall gauges G


1


,G


2


,G


3


are similar, i.e., the mid-sidewall gauge ratio MSGR is approximately 1.10 and the bead/flange gauge ratio BFGR is approximately 1.05.





FIG. 2

shows a cross-sectional view of a typical single-insert prior art pneumatic radial runflat tire


50


. The tire


50


differs from the multiple-insert tire


10


of

FIG. 1

in several ways: for example, it has only a single wedge insert


59




a


,


59




b


in each sidewall


77


,


78


, respectively; and a ply structure


56


consists, in a preferred embodiment, of a single ply


70


that is reinforced with high-modulus cords.




Tire


50


, in

FIG. 2

, otherwise shares similarities in structure with the tire


10


of FIG.


1


. The tire


50


has a tread cap


52


, a pair of sidewall portions


77


,


78


, a pair of transition regions


76




a


,


76




b


wherein the tread cap


52


smoothly transitions into the sidewall portions


77


,


78


, respectively, a pair of bead regions


20




a′


,


20




b′


, a belt structure


58


comprising two belts


67


,


68


and a fabric overlay


53


deployed between the bottom portion of tread cap


52


and the upper, or radially outermost, parts of the belt structure


58


. A carcass


61


comprises the ply structure


56


having the single ply


70


, a gas-impervious inner liner


74


, a pair of beads


36




a′


,


36




b′


, and a pair of bead filler apexes


38




a′


,


38




b′


. The single wedge insert


59




a


,


59




b


in each sidewall portion


77


,


78


, respectively, is located between the inner liner


74


and the first ply


70


. The fabric overlay


53


is disposed beneath, or radially inward of, the tread cap


52


and on top of, or radially outward from, the belt structure


58


. The ply


70


has turnup ends


64




a


,


64




b


that extend well out into the sidewall portions


77


,


78


, respectively. The reinforced sidewall portions


77


,


78


depicted in

FIG. 2

include chafers


62




a


,


62




b


and rim flange protectors


69




a


,


69




b


(also known as wheel-rim retainer lips). The rim flange protectors


69




a


,


69




b


maintain the tire upon a wheel rim (not shown) during runflat operation, while the chafers


62




a


,


62




b


protect the underlying ply structure


56


from abrasion against the wheel rim. The tire


50


has a section height SH′ indicated on the equatorial plane EP′.




The reinforced sidewall portions


77


,


78


of ply structure


56


give the tire


50


a limited runflat capability. As can be seen from

FIG. 2

, the structural reinforcement in the sidewall area of the tire


50


substantially increases the overall thickness of the sidewall portions


77


,


78


, particularly in the transition regions. For example, representative sidewall thicknesses may comprise: a shoulder gauge G


1


, measured in the middle of the transition regions


76




a


,


76




b


; a mid-sidewall gauge G


2


, measured at the middle SH′/


2


of the section height of the sidewall


77


,


78


, and a bead/flange gauge G


3


, measured in the bead area immediately above (radially outward of) the portion of the bead area


20




a′


,


20




b′


that contacts a wheel rim flange (not shown). In tire designs having rim flange protectors


69




a


,


69




b


as illustrated in

FIG. 2

, the bead/flange gauge G


3


is measured as shown to a flat outer surface of the rim flange protectors


69




a


,


69




b


exclusive of any decorative ribbing. For the purpose of comparing relative tire wall thicknesses, the gauge ratios MSGR, BFGR can be defined as described hereinabove. For the exemplary prior art tire


50


illustrated in

FIG. 2

, the sidewall gauges G


1


,G


2


,G


3


are similar, i.e., the mid-sidewall gauge ratio MSGR is approximately 0.85 and the bead/flange gauge ratio BFGR is approximately 1.15.




Thus, the generalized prior art runflat tire designs


10


,


50


show the more or less uniformly thickened sidewalls that characterize run flat tire designs. The insert-reinforced sidewalls are necessary to support the tire's load with minimal sidewall deflection when the runflat tire


10


,


50


is in an uninflated state. Such runflat tire designs provide good vehicle handling and performance under conditions of full inflation, and they yield acceptable runflat vehicle handling and runflat operational life when the tire is uninflated. However, the rolling ride and comfort of such runflat tire designs may be somewhat compromised due to a high coupling effect between the reinforced sidewalls and the tire crown area.




It should be apparent that the prior art runflat tire designs


10


,


50


presented herein are merely representative of a wide range of runflat tire designs that are generally characterized by sidewall stiffening devices comprising at least one insert (e.g.,


40




a


,


40




b


,


42




a


,


42




b


,


59




a


,


59




b


) placed in each sidewall (e.g.,


16


,


18


,


77


,


78


) among at least one ply (e.g.,


30


,


32


,


70


) of the radial ply structure (e.g.,


22


,


56


). It should be further understood that the sidewall stiffening devices may also include other elements, for example, such as fabric strips (not illustrated).




Concept of the Invention




The basic concept for the present invention is to improve runflat tire ride comfort by reducing tire wall gauges in the shoulder and transition regions and to compensate with supporting sidewalls that constantly increase in thickness from the transition region to the bead/flange area. Thus the bead and lower sidewall area are reinforced to a maximum and the shoulder area gets only the minimum stiffness necessary to achieve the required runflat performance. In a very simplified way, it can be said that the bead and lower sidewall area is carrying the crown area under runflat conditions. This concept has been applied to experimental tires, and specific gauge ratios MSGR, BFGR have been determined and experimentally proven in embodiments such as the two embodiments to be described hereinbelow with reference to

FIGS. 3 and 4

. Within the inventive context of wall gauges that constantly increase from the transition region to the bead/flange area, the inventive mid-sidewall gauge ratio MSGR is approximately within the range of 1.1 to 1.4, preferably approximately equal to 1.3; and the bead/flange gauge ratio BFGR is approximately within the range of 1.5 to 1.8, preferably approximately equal to 1.7. The invention will now be illustrated with two embodiments that provide solutions to the ride comfort problems of both multiple-insert and single-insert versions of runflat tires.




First Embodiment of the Invention




A first embodiment of the invention is illustrated by the tire


110


in

FIG. 3

that shows a cross-sectional view of an inventive multiple-insert pneumatic radial runflat tire


110


(compare tire


10


in FIG.


1


). The tire


110


is, for example, a 235/55R17 runflat tire. The tire


110


has a tread cap


112


, a belt structure


114


comprising belts


124


,


126


, a pair of sidewall portions


116


,


118


, a pair of transition regions


117




a


,


117




b


wherein the tread cap


112


smoothly transitions into the sidewall portions


116


,


118


, respectively, a pair of bead regions


120




a


,


120




b


, a carcass


121


with a ply structure


122


, and a fabric overlay


128


deployed between the bottom portion of the tread cap


112


and the upper parts of the belt structure


114


. The carcass


121


comprises the ply structure


122


having a first ply


130


and second ply


132


, a gas-impervious inner liner


134


, a pair of beads


136




a


,


136




b


, a pair of bead filler apexes


138




a


,


138




b


, a first pair of sidewall wedge inserts


140




a


,


140




b


, and a second pair of sidewall wedge inserts


142




a


,


142




b


. The first or innermost wedge insert


140




a


,


140




b


is located between the inner liner


134


and the first ply


130


, and the second wedge insert


142




a


,


142




b


is located between the first ply


130


and the second ply


132


. The fabric overlay


128


is disposed beneath, or radially inward of, tread cap


112


and on top of, or radially outward from, belt structure


114


. The innermost ply


130


wraps around the beads


136




a


,


136




b


and has turnup ends


146




a


,


46




b


that extend well out into the sidewall portions


116


,


118


, respectively. The reinforced sidewall portions


116


,


118


include chafers


144




a


,


144




b


that protect the underlying ply structure


122


from abrasion against a wheel rim (not shown). The elastomer in the chafers


144




a


,


144




b


is extended axially outward over a rim flange (not shown) thereby providing a thickened tire gauge in a bead/flange area


148




a


,


148




b.


The tire


110


has a section height SH


1


indicated on the equatorial plane EP


1


.




The reinforced sidewall portions


116


,


118


of ply structure


122


give the tire


110


a runflat capability. As can be seen from

FIG. 3

, the structural reinforcement in the sidewall area of the tire


110


follows the inventive concept wherein wall gauges constantly increase from the transition region


117




a


,


117




b


to the bead/flange area


148




a


,


148




b


. The wall gauges are increased by means of proper shaping and sizing of the wedge inserts


140




a


,


140




b


,


142




a


,


142




b


and of the elastomer in both the transition region


117




a


,


117




b


and in the bead/flange area


148




a


,


148




b


. In the tire


110


as constructed for the first embodiment of the invention, the shoulder gauge G


1


, measured in the middle of the transition regions


117




a


,


117




b


, is 14.0 mm; the mid-sidewall gauge G


2


, measured at the middle SH


1


/


2


of the section height of the sidewall


116


,


118


, is 17.9 mm; and the bead/flange gauge G


3


, measured across the bead/flange area


148




a


,


148




b


immediately above (radially outward of) the portion of the bead area


120




a


,


120




b


that contacts a wheel rim flange (not shown), is 23.7 mm. As a result, the mid-sidewall gauge ratio MSGR calculates to 1.28 (17.9 divided by 14.0); and the bead/flange gauge ratio BFGR calculates to 1.69 (23.7 divided by 14.0).




Second Embodiment of the Invention




A second embodiment of the invention is illustrated by the tire


150


in

FIG. 4

that shows a cross-sectional view of an inventive single-insert pneumatic radial runflat tire


150


(compare tire


50


in FIG.


2


). The tire


150


is, for example, a 205/50R17 runflat tire. The tire


150


differs from the multiple-insert tire


110


of

FIG. 3

in several ways: for example, it has only a single wedge insert


159




a


,


159




b


in each sidewall


177


,


178


, respectively; and a ply structure


156


consists, in a preferred embodiment, of a single ply


170


that is reinforced with high-modulus cords.




Tire


150


, in

FIG. 4

, otherwise shares similarities in structure with the tire


110


of FIG.


3


. The tire


150


has a tread cap


152


, a pair of sidewall portions


177


,


178


, a pair of transition regions


176




a


,


176




b


wherein the tread cap


152


smoothly transitions into the sidewall portions


177


,


178


, respectively, a pair of bead regions


120




a′


,


120




b′


, a belt structure


158


comprising two belts


167


,


168


and a fabric overlay


153


deployed between the bottom portion of tread cap


152


and the upper, or radially outermost, parts of the belt structure


158


. A carcass


161


comprises the ply structure


156


having the single ply


170


, a gas-impervious inner liner


174


, a pair of beads


136




a′


,


136




b′


, and a pair of bead filler apexes


138




a′


,


138




b′


. The single wedge insert


159




a


,


159




b


in each sidewall portion


177


,


178


, respectively, is located between the inner liner


174


and the first ply


170


. The fabric overlay


153


is disposed beneath, or radially inward of, the tread cap


152


and on top of, or radially outward from, the belt structure


158


. The ply


170


has turnup ends


164




a


,


164




b


that extend well out into the sidewall portions


177


,


178


, respectively. The reinforced sidewall portions


177


,


178


depicted in

FIG. 4

include chafers


162




a


,


162




b


and rim flange protectors


169




a


,


169




b


(also known as wheel-rim retainer lips) in bead/flange areas


172




a


,


172




b


. The rim flange protectors


169




a


,


169




b


maintain the tire upon a wheel rim (not shown) during runflat operation, while the chafers


162




a


,


162




b


protect the underlying ply structure


156


from abrasion against the wheel rim. The tire


150


has a section height SH


1


′ indicated on the equatorial plane EP


1


′.




The reinforced sidewall portions


177


,


178


of ply structure


156


give the tire


150


a runflat capability. As can be seen from

FIG. 4

, the structural reinforcement in the sidewall area of the tire


150


follows the inventive concept wherein wall gauges constantly increase from the transition region


176




a


,


176




b


to the rim flange protectors


169




a


,


169




b


in the bead/flange areas


172




a


,


172




b


. The wall gauges are increased by means of proper shaping and sizing of the wedge insert


159




a


,


159




b


and of the elastomer in both the transition region


176




a


,


176




b


and in the rim flange protectors


169




a


,


169




b


. In the tire


150


as constructed for the second embodiment of the invention, the shoulder gauge G


1


, measured in the middle of the transition regions


176




a


,


176




b


, is 12.4 mm; the mid-sidewall gauge G


2


, measured at the middle SH


1


′/


2


of the section height of the sidewall


177


,


178


, is 15.8 mm; and the bead/flange gauge G


3


, measured as shown to a flat outer surface of the rim flange protectors


169




a


,


169




b


exclusive of any decorative ribbing, is 20.9 mm. As a result, the mid-sidewall gauge ratio MSGR calculates to 1.27 (15.8 divided by 12.4); and the bead/flange gauge ratio BFGR calculates to 1.68 (20.9 divided by 12.4).




It should be apparent that the embodiments of the inventive runflat tire constructions


110


,


150


presented herein are merely representative of a wide range of runflat tire constructions that can be designed according to the teachings of the present invention. Accordingly, the present invention may generally be implemented in any pneumatic radial ply runflat tire that is characterized by sidewall stiffening devices comprising at least one insert (e.g.,


140




a


,


140




b


,


142




a


,


142




b


,


159




a


,


159




b


) placed in each sidewall (e.g.,


116


,


118


,


177


,


178


) among at least one ply (e.g.,


130


,


132


,


170


) of the radial ply structure (e.g.,


122


,


156


). It should be further understood that the sidewall stiffening devices may also include other elements, for example, such as fabric strips (not illustrated). Furthermore, the present invention is not limited to any particular materials or compounds that may be employed in the inserts and other elements of the tire construction.




Testing of a variety of experimental runflat tires constructed according to the present invention has shown, on the average, a significantly improved ride comfort as compared to comparable prior art runflat tires. The present invention apparently meets the need to develop a runflat tire structure that provides the necessary structural rigidity in the uninflated condition, while also providing sufficient radial flexibility to optimize ride and handling characteristics in the normal inflated condition.




Although the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, the same is to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character—it being understood that only preferred embodiments have been shown and described, and that all changes and modifications that come within the spirit of the invention are desired to be protected. Undoubtedly, many other “variations” on the “themes” set forth hereinabove will occur to one having ordinary skill in the art to which the present invention most nearly pertains, and such variations are intended to be within the scope of the invention, as disclosed herein.



Claims
  • 1. A pneumatic radial ply runflat tire comprising: a tread cap, two inextensible annular beads, a radial ply structure with at least two plies, a gas-impervious inner liner, a belt structure located between the tread cap and the radial ply structure, two sidewalls, a pair of transition regions wherein the tread cap smoothly transitions into each sidewall, a pair of bead filler apexes, at least two pairs of sidewall wedge inserts, and a pair of chafers that protect the underlying ply structure from abrasion against a wheel rim having a rim flange, the tire being characterized by:tire wall gauges that constantly increase in thickness from the transition region to a bead/flange area where the chafer extends axially outward over the rim flange when the tire is mounted on the wheel rim.
  • 2. The pneumatic radial ply runflat tire of claim 1, further characterized by:a tire wall gauge being a shoulder gauge, measured in the middle of the transition regions; a tire wall gauge being a bead/flange gauge, measured immediately radially outward of the portion of the chafer that contacts the wheel rim flange; and a bead/flange gauge ratio, being defined as the bead/flange gauge divided by the shoulder gauge; wherein: the bead/flange gauge ratio is within the range of 1.5 to 1.8.
  • 3. The pneumatic radial ply runflat tire of claim 2, wherein:the bead/flange gauge ratio is approximately equal to 1.7.
  • 4. The pneumatic radial ply runflat tire of claim 2, further characterized by:a tire wall gauge being a mid-sidewall gauge, measured at the middle of the section height of the sidewall; and a mid-sidewall gauge ratio, being defined as the mid-sidewall gauge divided by the shoulder gauge; wherein: the mid-sidewall gauge ratio is within the range of 1.1 to 1.4.
  • 5. The pneumatic radial ply runflat tire of claim 4, wherein:the mid-sidewall gauge ratio is approximately equal to 1.3.
  • 6. The pneumatic radial ply runflat tire of claim 1, further characterized by:a tire wall gauge being a shoulder gauge, measured in the middle of the transition regions; a tire wall gauge being a mid-sidewall gauge, measured at the middle of the section height of the sidewall; and a mid-sidewall gauge ratio, being defined as the mid-sidewall gauge divided by the shoulder gauge; wherein: the mid-sidewall gauge ratio is within the range of 1.1 to 1.4.
  • 7. The pneumatic radial ply runflat tire of claim 6, wherein:the mid-sidewall gauge ratio is approximately equal to 1.3.
  • 8. A pneumatic radial ply runflat tire comprising: a tread cap, two inextensible annular beads, a radial ply structure with a single ply, a gas-impervious inner liner, a belt structure located between the tread cap and the radial ply structure, two sidewalls, a pair of transition regions wherein the tread cap smoothly transitions into each sidewall, a pair of bead filler apexes, one pair of sidewall wedge inserts, and a pair of chafers that protect the underlying ply structure from abrasion against a wheel rim having a rim flange, the tire being characterized by:tire wall gauges that constantly increase in thickness from the transition region to a bead/flange area where the chafer extends axially outward over the rim flange when the tire is mounted on the wheel rim.
  • 9. The pneumatic radial ply runflat tire of claim 8, further characterized by:a tire wall gauge being a shoulder gauge, measured in the middle of the transition regions; a tire wall gauge being a bead/flange gauge, measured immediately radially outward of the portion of the chafer that contacts the wheel rim flange; and a bead/flange gauge ratio, being defined as the bead/flange gauge divided by the shoulder gauge; wherein: the bead/flange gauge ratio is within the range of 1.5 to 1.8.
  • 10. The pneumatic radial ply runflat tire of claim 9, wherein:the bead/flange gauge ratio is approximately equal to 1.7.
  • 11. The pneumatic radial ply runflat tire of claim 9, further characterized by:a tire wall gauge being a mid-sidewall gauge, measured at the middle of the section height of the sidewall; and a mid-sidewall gauge ratio, being defined as the mid-sidewall gauge divided by the shoulder gauge; wherein: the mid-sidewall gauge ratio is within the range of 1.1 to 1.4.
  • 12. The pneumatic radial ply runflat tire of claim 11, wherein:the mid-sidewall gauge ratio is approximately equal to 1.3.
  • 13. The pneumatic radial ply runflat tire of claim 8, further characterized by:a tire wall gauge being a shoulder gauge, measured in the middle of the transition regions; a tire wall gauge being a mid-sidewall gauge, measured at the middle of the section height of the sidewall; and a mid-sidewall gauge ratio, being defined as the mid-sidewall gauge divided by the shoulder gauge; wherein: the mid-sidewall gauge ratio is within the range of 1.1 to 1.4.
  • 14. The pneumatic radial ply runflat tire of claim 13, wherein:the mid-sidewall gauge ratio is approximately equal to 1.3.
  • 15. A pneumatic radial ply runflat tire comprising: a tread cap, two inextensible annular beads, a radial ply structure with at least one ply, a gas-impervious inner liner, a belt structure located between the tread cap and the radial ply structure, two sidewalls, a pair of transition regions wherein the tread cap smoothly transitions into each sidewall, a pair of bead filler apexes, at least one pair of sidewall wedge inserts, and a pair of chafers that protect the underlying ply structure from abrasion against a wheel rim having a rim flange, the tire being characterized by:tire wall gauges that constantly increase in thickness from the transition region to a bead/flange area where the chafer extends axially outward over the rim flange when the tire is mounted on the wheel rim.
  • 16. The pneumatic radial ply runflat tire of claim 15, further characterized by:a tire wall gauge being a shoulder gauge, measured in the middle of the transition regions; a tire wall gauge being a bead/flange gauge, measured immediately radially outward of the portion of the chafer that contacts the wheel rim flange; and a bead/flange gauge ratio, being defined as the bead/flange gauge divided by the shoulder gauge; wherein: the bead/flange gauge ratio is within the range of 1.5 to 1.8.
  • 17. The pneumatic radial ply runflat tire of claim 16, wherein:the bead/flange gauge ratio is approximately equal to 1.7.
  • 18. The pneumatic radial ply runflat tire of claim 16, further characterized by:a tire wall gauge being a mid-sidewall gauge, measured at the middle of the section height of the sidewall; and a mid-sidewall gauge ratio, being defined as the mid-sidewall gauge divided by the shoulder gauge; wherein: the mid-sidewall gauge ratio is within the range of 1.1 to 1.4.
  • 19. The pneumatic radial ply runflat tire of claim 18, wherein:the mid-sidewall gauge ratio is approximately equal to 1.3.
  • 20. The pneumatic radial ply runflat tire of claim 15, further characterized by:a tire wall gauge being a shoulder gauge, measured in the middle of the transition regions; a tire wall gauge being a mid-sidewall gauge, measured at the middle of the section height of the sidewall; and a mid-sidewall gauge ratio, being defined as the mid-sidewall gauge divided by the shoulder gauge; wherein: the mid-sidewall gauge ratio is within the range of 1.1 to 1.4, and is preferably approximately equal to 1.3.
US Referenced Citations (7)
Number Name Date Kind
3464477 Verdier Sep 1969 A
4111249 Markow Sep 1978 A
5058646 Kajikawa et al. Oct 1991 A
5368082 Oare et al. Nov 1994 A
5427166 Willard, Jr. Jun 1995 A
5511599 Willard, Jr. Apr 1996 A
6401777 Verbeke-Ensch et al. Jun 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
0475258 Mar 1992 EP
1022162 Jul 2000 EP
1145874 Oct 2001 EP
WO 0020236 Apr 2000 WO
WO 0046047 Aug 2000 WO