The invention relates generally to tire monitoring systems. More particularly, the invention relates to systems that predict tire wear. Specifically, the invention is directed to a system and method for estimating tire wear state based upon a change in the length of the footprint of the tire.
Tire wear plays an important role in vehicle factors such as safety, reliability, and performance. Tread wear, which refers to the loss of material from the tread of the tire, directly affects such vehicle factors. As a result, it is desirable to monitor and/or measure the amount of tread wear experienced by a tire, which is indicated as the tire wear state. It is to be understood that for the purpose of convenience, the terms “tread wear” and “tire wear” may be used interchangeably.
One approach to the monitoring and/or measurement of tread wear has been through the use of wear sensors disposed in the tire tread, which has been referred to as a direct method or approach. The direct approach to measuring tire wear from tire-mounted sensors has multiple challenges. Placing the sensors in an uncured or “green” tire to then be cured at high temperatures may cause damage to the wear sensors. In addition, sensor durability can prove to be an issue in meeting the millions of cycles requirement for tires. Moreover, wear sensors in a direct measurement approach must be small enough not to cause any uniformity problems as the tire rotates at high speeds. Finally, wear sensors can be expensive and add significantly to the cost of the tire.
Due to such challenges, alternative approaches have been developed, which involve prediction of tread wear over the life of the tire, including indirect estimations of the tire wear state. These alternative approaches have experienced certain disadvantages in the prior art due to a lack of optimum prediction techniques, which reduces the accuracy and/or reliability of the tread wear predictions. For example, many such techniques involve data or information that is not easily obtained, such as non-standard vehicle system signals, or data that is not accurate under all driving conditions.
In addition, certain prior art techniques of indirectly estimating tire wear involve obtaining data from the vehicle controller area network, which is referred to in the art as the vehicle CAN bus. It may be undesirably difficult to access or utilize the vehicle CAN bus in an economical and reliable manner.
As a result, there is a need in the art for a system and method that accurately and reliably estimates tire wear state using easily obtained and accurate parameters, and which can operate independently of the vehicle CAN bus.
According to an aspect of an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a tire wear state estimation system is provided. The system includes a vehicle and a tire that supports the vehicle. A sensor unit is mounted on the tire and includes a footprint centerline length measurement sensor to measure a centerline length of a footprint of the tire, a pressure sensor to measure a pressure of the tire, a temperature sensor to measure a temperature of the tire, and electronic memory capacity for storing identification information for the tire. A processor is in electronic communication with the sensor unit and receives the measured centerline length, the measured pressure, the measured temperature and the identification information. A tire construction database stores tire construction data and is in electronic communication with the processor. The identification information is correlated to the tire construction data. An analysis module is stored on the processor and receives the measured centerline length, the measured pressure, the measured temperature, the identification information, and the tire construction data as inputs. The analysis module includes a prediction model that generates an estimated wear state for the tire from the inputs.
According to another aspect of an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a method for estimating the wear state of a tire supporting a vehicle is provided. The method includes the steps of mounting a sensor unit on the tire, measuring a footprint centerline length of the tire with the sensor unit, measuring a pressure of the tire with the sensor unit, measuring a temperature of the tire with the sensor unit, and storing identification information for the tire in the sensor unit. The measured centerline length, the measured pressure, the measured temperature and the identification information are received in a processor. Tire construction data is stored in a tire construction database that is in electronic communication with the processor, and the identification information is correlated to the tire construction data. An analysis module is stored on the processor, and the analysis module receives the measured centerline length, the measured pressure, the measured temperature, the identification information, and the tire construction data as inputs. An estimated wear state for the tire is generated from the inputs with a prediction model in the analysis module.
The invention will be described by way of example and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Similar numerals refer to similar parts throughout the drawings.
“ANN” or “artificial neural network” is an adaptive tool for non-linear statistical data modeling that changes its structure based on external or internal information that flows through a network during a learning phase. ANN neural networks are non-linear statistical data modeling tools used to model complex relationships between inputs and outputs or to find patterns in data.
“Axial” and “axially” means lines or directions that are parallel to the axis of rotation of the tire.
“CAN bus” is an abbreviation for controller area network.
“Circumferential” means lines or directions extending along the perimeter of the surface of the annular tread perpendicular to the axial direction.
“Equatorial centerplane (CP)” means the plane perpendicular to the tire's axis of rotation and passing through the center of the tread.
“Footprint” means the contact patch or area of contact created by the tire tread with a flat surface as the tire rotates or rolls.
“Inboard side” means the side of the tire nearest the vehicle when the tire is mounted on a wheel and the wheel is mounted on the vehicle.
“Lateral” means an axial direction.
“Outboard side” means the side of the tire farthest away from the vehicle when the tire is mounted on a wheel and the wheel is mounted on the vehicle.
“Radial” and “radially” means directions radially toward or away from the axis of rotation of the tire.
“Rib” means a circumferentially extending strip of rubber on the tread which is defined by at least one circumferential groove and either a second such groove or a lateral edge, the strip being laterally undivided by full-depth grooves.
“Tread element” or “traction element” means a rib or a block element defined by a shape having adjacent grooves.
With reference to
With particular reference to
The tires 12 are of conventional construction, and each tire is mounted on a respective wheel 16 as known to those skilled in the art. Each tire 12 includes a pair of sidewalls 18 (only one shown) that extend to a circumferential tread 20, which wears with age from road abrasion. An innerliner 22 is disposed on the inner surface of the tire 12, and when the tire is mounted on the wheel 16, an internal cavity 24 is formed, which is filled with a pressurized fluid, such as air.
A sensor unit 26 is attached to the innerliner 22 of each tire 12 by means such as an adhesive, and measures certain parameters or conditions of the tire as will be described in greater detail below. It is to be understood that the sensor unit 26 may be attached in such a manner, or to other components of the tire 12, such as on or in one of the sidewalls 18, on or in the tread 20, on the wheel 16, and/or a combination thereof. For the purpose of convenience, reference herein shall be made to mounting of the sensor unit 26 on the tire 12, with the understanding that such mounting includes all such attachment.
The sensor unit 26 is mounted on each tire 12 for the purpose of detecting certain real-time tire parameters, such as tire pressure 38 (
The sensor unit 26 preferably also includes electronic memory capacity for storing identification (ID) information for each tire 12, known as tire ID information and indicated at 42 (
Turning to
It has been observed that, as the tire 12 wears, the centerline length 28 decreases. For example, the footprint 32 shown in
Further testing confirmed this observation, showing a reduction of centerline length 28 corresponding to wear of the tire 12, including up to a 20% decrease in the centerline length when the tread depth was reduced by 100%, or completely reduced to a legal limit. It is to be understood that the sensor unit 26 measures the centerline length 28, 28w of the tire 12 at a certain point in time, and for the purpose of convenience, any such measurement shall be referred to as the centerline length 28.
It is to be understood that the pressure sensor, the temperature sensor, the tire ID capacity and/or the centerline length sensor may be incorporated into the single sensor unit 26, or may be incorporated into multiple units. For the purpose of convenience, reference herein shall be made to a single sensor unit 26.
With reference to
Aspects of the tire wear state estimation system 10 preferably are executed on the processor 36, which enables input of data from the sensor unit 26 and execution of specific analysis techniques and algorithms, to be described below, which are stored in a suitable storage medium and are also in electronic communication with the processor.
In this manner, the sensor unit 26 measures the tire pressure 38, tire temperature 40 and centerline length 28, and transmits these measured parameters to the processor 36 with the tire ID information 42. The tire ID information 42 enables a tire construction database 44 to be electronically accessed 46. The tire construction database 44 stores tire construction data 50, which will be described in greater detail below. The database 44 is in electronic communication with the processor 36 and may be stored on the processor, enabling transmission 48 of the tire construction data 50 to the processor 36.
The tire ID information 42 may be correlated to specific construction data 50 for each tire 12, including: the tire type; tire model; size information, such as rim size, width, and outer diameter; manufacturing location; manufacturing date; a treadcap code that includes or correlates to a compound identification; a mold code that includes or correlates to a tread structure identification; a tire footprint shape factor (FSF), a mold design drop; a tire belt/breaker angle; and an overlay material. The tire ID information 42 may also correlate to a service history or other information to identify specific features and parameters of each tire 12, as well as mechanical characteristics of the tire, such as cornering parameters, spring rate, load-inflation relationship, and the like.
An analysis module 52 is stored on the processor 36, and receives the tire pressure 38, tire temperature 40, tire centerline length 28, tire ID information 42, and tire construction data 50. The analysis module 52 analyzes these inputs to generate an estimate of the tire wear state, indicated at 54, as will be described in greater detail below.
Turning to
An event filter 62 is applied to the data received from the vehicle-mounted collection unit 56. More particularly, vehicle conditions are reviewed in the event filter 62, including the measured vehicle speed 58 from GPS data and the inertial measurements 60. These measured values are compared to threshold values, including upper and lower limits. If the measured values are outside of the threshold values, the system 10 does not proceed, as the vehicle 14 is likely to be operating outside of normal or predictable conditions. If the measured values are within the threshold values, the measured data of tire pressure 38, tire temperature 40, centerline length 28 and vehicle speed 58 are sent to a denormalization filter 64.
The denormalization filter 64 is employed to account for and eliminate the effect of inflation pressure 38, temperature 40 and vehicle speed 58 on the centerline length 28 of the tire 12. In the denormalization filter 64, a pre-trained regression model is used to account for the effects of inflation pressure 38, temperature 40 and vehicle speed 58. Regardless of the vehicle and tire operating conditions, the centerline length 28 is regressed to a pre-defined nominal condition, that is, a pre-defined inflation pressure 38, temperature 40 and vehicle speed 58.
In addition, the fastest wearing portion of the tire 12 may not always be at the centerline 30 (
The denormalization filter 64 generates a normalized footprint length 66. Because the centerline length 28 of the tire 12 may also be affected by the vehicle load, the effect of load on the normalized footprint length 66 must be accounted for and eliminated. To eliminate the effect of load on the normalized footprint length 66, a historical footprint measurement database 68 is accessed. The historical footprint measurement database 68 is in electronic communication with the processor 36 and may be stored on the processor, and contains a historical log of footprint measurements 70. The normalized footprint length 66 is correlated to the historical log 70 and an average of the values is taken.
The average of the values is applied to a time filter 72. The time filter 72 accounts for time-scale decomposition of the tire 12. More particularly, the time filter 72 accounts for and eliminates bias due to factors or parameters that may affect the tire 12 over time, and which are not among the above-described measured parameters. The technique employed in the time filter 72 is described in greater detail in an Application titled “Method for Extracting Changes in Tire Characteristics”, which is being filed concurrently with the instant Application by the same Assignee, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, and which is incorporated herein in its entirety.
The time filter 72 yields a regularized footprint length 74 for the tire 12. The regularized footprint length 74 is input into a prediction model 76 to generate the estimated wear state 54 for the tire 12. The prediction model 76 preferably is a non-linear regression model. By way of background, non-linear regression models are a form of regression analysis in which observational data are modeled by a function that is a nonlinear combination of the model parameters, and depends on one or more independent variables. Examples of non-linear regression models that may be employed in the prediction model 76 include a Random Forest Regressor, an XgBoost Regressor, and a CatBoost Regressor.
In this manner, the tire-based measured values of centerline length 28, pressure 38 and temperature 40 are input into the analysis module 52, along with the tire ID information 42 and the vehicle-based measured values of speed 58 and inertia 60. The normalized footprint length 66 is generated after the denormalization filter 64 is applied, and the regularized footprint length 74 is generated after the normalized footprint length is correlated to the historical log 70 and an average of the values is applied to the time filter 72. The prediction model 76 employs the regularized footprint length 74 to estimate the wear state 54 of the tire 12.
Referring to
In addition, the tire wear state estimation 54 may be compared in the processor 36 to a predetermined wear limit. If the wear state estimation 54 is below the limit of acceptable remaining depth of the tread 20, a notice may be transmitted to the display device 84. The tire wear state estimation system 10 thus may provide notice or a recommendation to a vehicle operator that one or more tires 12 are worn and should be replaced.
The tire wear state estimation system 10 may also transmit or communicate the tire wear state estimation 54 to a service center or a fleet manager. Moreover, the tire wear state estimation system 10 may transmit or communicate the tire wear state estimation 54 to an electronic control unit of the vehicle 14 and/or a vehicle control system, such as the braking system and/or the suspension system, to increase the performance of such systems.
In this manner, the tire wear state estimation system 10 of the present invention estimates the wear state of the tire 12 by measuring the tire-based parameters of footprint centerline length 28, pressure 38 and temperature 40, measuring the vehicle-based parameters of speed 58 and inertia 60, and incorporating tire ID information 42. The system 10 inputs these parameters and information into an analysis module 52, which provides an accurate and reliable estimation of the tire wear state 54. The tire wear state estimation system 10 of the present invention thus provides an independent, standalone system that does not need to be integrated into the electronic systems of the vehicle, including the CAN bus system.
The present invention also includes a method of estimating the wear state of a tire 12. The method includes steps in accordance with the description that is presented above and shown in
It is to be understood that the structure and method of the above-described tire wear state estimation system may be altered or rearranged, or components or steps known to those skilled in the art omitted or added, without affecting the overall concept or operation of the invention. For example, electronic communication may be through a wired connection or wireless communication without affecting the overall concept or operation of the invention. Such wireless communications include radio frequency (RF) and Bluetooth® communications.
The invention has been described with reference to a preferred embodiment. Potential modifications and alterations will occur to others upon a reading and understanding of this description. It is to be understood that all such modifications and alterations are included in the scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims, or the equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5749984 | Frey et al. | May 1998 | A |
5864056 | Bell et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6083268 | Kelsey et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6430993 | Seta | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6532812 | King | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6591668 | Becherer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6883962 | Kurata | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7158018 | Schick | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7299694 | Byrne | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7404318 | Merino-Lopez et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7523656 | Blixhavn et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7543491 | Hammerschmidt et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7568384 | Morinaga | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7577532 | Ichikawa et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7673505 | Hammerschmidt | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7680610 | Miyashita et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7755367 | Schoen et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8049515 | Schoen et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8065911 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8096172 | Gotschlich | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8371159 | Morinaga | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8402821 | Fink et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8443660 | Grande et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8483976 | Morinaga | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8555698 | Neugebauer et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8558680 | Pannek | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8775017 | Brusarosco et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8794058 | Bigot et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8833410 | Paturle | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8849500 | Gokyu | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8881573 | Paturle et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8892298 | Paturle et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8904869 | Paturle | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9052257 | Shibata | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9423320 | Kuramoto et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9513192 | Kretschmann et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9669664 | Kretschmann | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9873293 | Singh et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9908374 | Dussinger et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9921134 | Unterreiner et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9962999 | Roty | May 2018 | B2 |
9963146 | Singh et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9994082 | Seboe et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10000100 | Weston | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10005328 | Makino et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10024765 | Neau | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10082381 | McMillen | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10112444 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10132719 | Fudulea | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10207551 | Benbouhout et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10222299 | Ledoux | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10245906 | Singh et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10252583 | Kandler et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10259274 | Lange et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10286734 | Masago | May 2019 | B2 |
10286735 | Guinart et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10328755 | Tebano et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10350949 | Surendra | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10399396 | Limbrunner et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10471779 | Masago | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10495457 | Cyllik et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10513156 | Hrabal | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10603962 | Singh | Mar 2020 | B2 |
20040049303 | Levy et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20060114107 | Kim et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20120273102 | Paturle | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20150040656 | Singh et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150247780 | Kretschmann et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20170124784 | Wittman et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20180066929 | Kandler et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180154707 | Singh | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180180463 | Cyllik et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180253109 | Fontaine et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190025113 | Masago | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190184763 | Pulford et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190193479 | Pulford et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190304084 | Oblizajek | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190382034 | Miller et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200001662 | Storti et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200023693 | Ochi et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200031183 | Kim | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200047571 | Oblizajek | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200062268 | Steiner | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200070589 | Kuerzl et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200094634 | Decoster et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200126323 | Ledoux et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200182746 | Singh | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20210008933 | Kretschmann et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101183402 | May 2008 | CN |
106248401 | Dec 2016 | CN |
109472885 | Mar 2019 | CN |
102013208553 | Nov 2014 | DE |
102013220882 | Apr 2015 | DE |
102014214626 | Jan 2016 | DE |
102017221142 | May 2019 | DE |
3318422 | May 2018 | EP |
2013169816 | Sep 2013 | JP |
2016137847 | Aug 2016 | JP |
2015055429 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2019186353 | Oct 2019 | WO |
2019239305 | Feb 2020 | WO |
2020070051 | Apr 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
EPO search report received by Applicant dated Dec. 2, 2020. |
Zhou Haibin, Prediction of wear life of engineering tires, Prediction of wear life of engineering tires, Jun. 30, 2004, 36-40, 46, 6, World Rubber Industry. |
Zhu Chunxia, et al, Computer simulation of radial tire wear, Computer simulation of radial tire wear, Feb. 1, 2008, 57-58, 2, Research on Agricultural Mechanization. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210061022 A1 | Mar 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62893852 | Aug 2019 | US |