TIRE WITH COMPLEX BELTS

BACKGROUND

Since the advent of the pneumatic tire, tire engineers have had to deal with a variety of vehicle performance parameters for which the tire has a significant effect. Some examples of these performance attributes are dry and wet traction, handling, comfort, and noise. One of the advances that tire engineers have made to improve these performance attributes is to increase the width of the tire while at the same time increasing the rim diameter of the wheel upon which the tire is mounted. The result of these design choices is that the sidewall height is reduced. Sidewall height is measured as the radial height between the center of the tread and the nominal wheel diameter. The ratio of the section width to the sidewall height forms a dimensionless parameter referred to as the “aspect ratio” of the tire. Tires that are commonly found on high performance vehicles may have a very large width, 300 mm or more, and a very low aspect ratio, often in the range of 0.25.

These very wide tires have presented challenges to tire engineers to maintain high levels of wet traction at the speeds that high performance vehicles may be capable of. A tire that is mounted on the vehicle, then loaded, and inflated to its design values forms a quasi-rectangular shaped contact surface with the road surface. To maximize road holding it is desirable to maintain this tread contact surface under a variety operating conditions. In particular, when the tire rolls through a deep-water layer on the road and at high speeds, the grooves in the tire tread may not be able of displacing the water layer. Under these conditions, a hydrodynamic lift occurs that reduces the extent of tread contact surface and may reduce the wet traction level afforded by the tire.

In an attempt to solve this problem, tire engineers have employed various means to add a deep or wide longitudinally groove in the center portion of the tread to allow the tire to displace the water. This groove configuration effectively creates two contact surfaces that are about one-half the width that would be found on a conventional tire. An example of this approach is embodied in U.S. Pat. No. 5,176,766, wherein the tread grooves of a tire of otherwise conventional construction have been modified to provide a center groove that it much wider than the grooves to either side. All grooves have a conventional depth. This accomplishes the desired improvement on a new tire, but as the tire wears, the central groove becomes narrow and now the contact surface resembles that of a conventional tire.

In another approach described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,830,273 the tire's construction is modified by adding an annular reinforcement at the centerline of the tire. This allows the meridian profile of the tire's carcass to be modified in a manner akin to joining two narrower tires at the center to form a single, wide tire. This approach has the advantage that the central groove can be made both wider and deeper, and that the central groove is maintained throughout the service life of the tire. However, a tire of this construction is not easily manufactured on conventional tire building machines.

Both these and other attempts to achieve such a shape have led to manufacturing complexities and/or compromises in other tire performances. Therefore, it would be advantageous to provide a new approach to achieving the dual contact surface while avoiding the manufacturing complexities and/or compromises in other tire performance attributes.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An exemplary tire comprises at least a left tread portion, a right tread portion, wherein the left tread portion and the right tread portion are axially separated by a longitudinally oriented groove. The tire has a carcass layer comprising reinforcing cords to form a left sidewall and a right sidewall. The reinforcing cords of the carcass layer are anchored, respectively, in a left bead portion and a right bead portion. The left sidewall extends radially to join the left tread portion and the right sidewall extends radially to join the right tread portion. When the tire is mounted on a rim, the tread portions, the sidewall portions, and the bead portions enclose a cavity by which the tire is inflated for operation under various applied loads. A tread reinforcement comprises a plurality of tread reinforcing layers wherein the reinforcement elements are formed of parallel reinforcements arranged in opposing layers, and each of the opposing layers has a bias angle β relative to the circumferential direction. The bias angles β of the reinforcement elements in each of the tread reinforcing layers corresponds to a plurality of equilibrium membrane shapes determined from membrane equilibrium equations that are joined together to create a continuous, complex shape.

In a further aspect of the exemplary tire, a central tread reinforcing layer has a concave shape and a bias angle β₁that is less a bias angle β₂of a left tread reinforcing layer and a right tread reinforcing layer, a crown radius of the central tread reinforcing layer is less than a crown radius of the left tread reinforcing layer and less than a crown radius of the right tread reinforcing layer. One of the left tread reinforcing layer and the right tread reinforcing layer has a convex shape.

In various embodiments of the exemplary tire, the reinforcing layers have continuously varying bias angle β of the reinforcement elements in the axial direction of the tire. The tread reinforcement may be a single, unitary or continuous, tread reinforcing layer extending the width of the tire in which the bias angles β of the reinforcement elements are continuously variable in the axial direction.

In another embodiment of the exemplary tire, the left tread reinforcing layer and the right tread reinforcing layer have a convex shape and the central tread reinforcing layer has a convex shape. In other embodiments, the tread reinforcing layer comprises a left outer convex section, a left flat section, and a left inner convex section, a central section, a right inner convex section, a right flat section, and a right outer convex section.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A full and enabling disclosure of the present invention, including the best mode thereof, directed to one of ordinary skill in the art, is set forth in the specification, which makes reference to the appended figures, in which:

FIG. 1 provides a cross-sectional view through a tire meridian plane of a tire representative of U.S. Pat. No. 3,830,273.

FIG. 2 provides a representation of a tire 100 of a size 335/25ZR20 according to a first exemplary embodiment showing a dual tread with wide center groove.

FIG. 3 provides a cross-section view through a tire meridian plane of the tire 100 of the invention.

FIG. 4 provides a perspective view of the complex belt arrangement of the tire 100.

FIG. 5 provides a view looking radially inward of the complex belt arrangement of the tire 100.

FIGS. 6
a and 6b provide a schematic representation of a tire having bias plies and the nomenclature and coordinate systems associated therewith.

FIG. 7 depicts the shape of the bias membrane when β_cis above the critical belt angle for a complete membrane shape for r_e=250, r_c=300, β_c=30 deg.

FIG. 8 depicts the shape of the bias membrane when β_cis equal to the critical belt angle

FIG. 9 depicts the shape of the bias membrane when β_cis below the critical belt angle.

FIG. 10 depicts a complex belt arrangement of the tire 100.

FIG. 11 depicts an exemplary embodiment of a tire building drum for the complex belt arrangement of the tire 100.

FIG. 12
a depicts an exemplary embodiment of a complex belt arrangement of the tire 100 having a single overlap portion.

FIG. 12
b depicts an exemplary embodiment of a complex belt arrangement of the tire 100 having multiple overlap portions.

FIG. 13 provides a representation of a tire 200 of a second exemplary embodiment showing a dual tread with wide center groove.

FIG. 14 depicts a complex belt arrangement of the tire 200.

FIG. 15 depicts the axial variation of the belt angle β for the complex belt arrangement of the tire 200.

FIG. 16 provides a view looking radially inward of the complex belt arrangement of the tire 200, further illustrating the axial variation of the belt angle β.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention provides a unique belt arrangement that may be used in a pneumatic tire to achieving the dual contact surface while avoiding the manufacturing complexities and/or compromises in other tire performance attributes. For purposes of describing the invention, reference now will be made in detail to embodiments and/or methods of the invention, one or more examples of which are illustrated in or with the drawings. Each example is provided by way of explanation of the invention, not limitation of the invention. In fact, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. For instance, features or steps illustrated or described as part of one embodiment, can be used with another embodiment or steps to yield a still further embodiments or methods. Thus, it is intended that the present invention covers such modifications and variations as come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.

The following terms are defined for this disclosure as follows, the details of which are as shown in FIG. 6. Throughout this disclosure, a cylindrical coordinate system is used.

“Axial direction,” x refers to a direction z parallel to the axis of rotation of a tire, and/or wheel as it travels along a road surface.

“Radial direction or Radius,” r refers to a direction r that is orthogonal to the axial direction and extends outward from the axis of rotation.

“Equatorial plane” refers to a plane that passes perpendicular to the axis of rotation and bisects the tire structure.

“Equator” refers to the widest portion of the profile of a reinforcing layer.

“Meridian plane” refers to a plane that passes parallel to and through the axis of rotation of the tire structure. This view is commonly known as a “cut plane.”

“Concave” means that the curvature of the tread reinforcing layers layer as seen in the two-dimensional view of a meridian plane has a center of curvature located outward from the tire.

Convex” means that the curvature of the tread reinforcing layers layer as seen in the two-dimensional view of a meridian plane has a center of curvature located inward from the tire. A conventional tire has convex tread reinforcing layers.

“Crown Radius” r_cmeans the radius at which a tangent to the membrane equilibrium curve is horizontal.

“Equator Radius,” r_eis the radius at which a tangent to a convex section of the membrane equilibrium curve is vertical.

FIG. 1 provides a cross-sectional view through a tire meridian plane of a tire representative of the prior efforts to obtain a tire with a dual contact surface as described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,830,273. A tire is formed with two treads spaced transversely from each other, two outer sidewalls terminating in beads reinforced with bead wires, and, between the treads, a connection comprising in its center a wire rod forming a closed loop of a diameter intermediate between the diameter of the bead wires and the diameter of the treads. Each tread has its own independent reinforcement, and each sidewall has a rigid zone close to the bead and a flexible zone close to the tread. The connection has on opposite sides of the central wire rod substantially the same structure and the same membrane equilibrium profile when the tire is inflated, and therefore the same radial flexibility, as the flexible zones of the two outer sidewalls.

FIG. 2 shows an exemplary representation of a tire 100 of the invention of size 335/25ZR20 showing a left tread portion 110 and a right tread portion 120, wherein the tread portions are axially separated by a single longitudinally oriented groove 130. In this exemplary embodiment of tire 100, the groove 130 is much wider and deeper than the grooves commonly found on conventional pneumatic tires. That is to say, the central groove has a depth in the radial direction greater than the wearable tread depth of the tire as would commonly be defined by industry standard tread wear indicators in adjacent grooves or, in the limit, by wear of tread that would expose the tread reinforcement.

Although the tire 100 and the tire 200 (see FIG. 13), have the groove 130 (230) located at the centerline of the tire, it is within the scope of the invention to a have the groove 130 located at other than the centerline to produce a tire having an asymmetric tread profile. It is also within the scope of the invention have a tread comprising a plurality of longitudinal grooves and each longitudinal groove 130 (230) is separated laterally by a tread potion. The defining theory and equations disclosed herebelow will apply to any such configuration.

Now turning to FIG. 3, which provides a cross-sectional view through the tire meridian plane of the tire 100 of the invention. The tire 100 has a carcass layer 111 comprising substantially radially oriented reinforcing cords to form a left sidewall 112 and a right sidewall 122. The reinforcements of the carcass layer 111 are anchored, respectively, in the left bead portion 114 and the right bead portion 124. The left sidewall 112 extends radially to join the left tread portion 110. Similarly, the right sidewall 122 extends radially to join the right tread portion 120. When mounted on a rim (not shown), the tread, sidewall, and bead portions form a cavity by which the tire is inflated for operation under various applied loads.

In the prior tire shown in FIG. 1, each tread portion has its own independent reinforcing layers that are similar to the reinforcing layers found in a convention tire. Moreover, in this tire, the reinforcing layers have an axial width less than the axial width of the tread portions. In this tire, only the carcass layer provides reinforcement between the axially inward extent of the reinforcing layers and the wire rod connection.

In a first exemplary embodiment of the tire 100, a shape of the tread reinforcement in the tire meridian plane that has at least a central tread reinforcing layer 135 that is concave and can be used to create a groove in the belt at the center of the tire. A pair of tread reinforcing layers in each of the tread portions that has a conventional, convex shape can be joined laterally to the central reinforcing layer to create a reinforcing layer that extends the full width of the tire. As depicted in FIG. 3, the tire 100 has a left tread reinforcing layer 115, a right tread reinforcing layer 125, and a central tread reinforcing layer 135 radially inward from the groove 130. This description of the tire 100 having three separate tread reinforcing layers is only an exemplary embodiment. It is within the scope of the invention for the tire 100 to have a plurality of tread reinforcing layers. Alternatively, the tire 100 may have a single tread reinforcing layer in which the belt angles β vary in the axial direction. As is apparent from the cut plane view shown in FIG. 3, the tire 100 eliminates the need for the wire rod connection while preserving a deep central groove in the tread. Such a tire 100 should have superior hydroplaning performance when compared to a conventionally constructed, wide performance tire, especially at the end of tread life.

An inventive principle of tire 100 having a complex belt design is to specify reinforcement elements having reinforcement at opposing bias angles β relative to the longitudinal direction of the tire to achieve separate equilibrium membrane shapes that are joined together to create a continuous, complex shape. One skilled in the art of tires will understand the physical principles related to the equilibrium shape of a reinforced membrane when it is subjected to inflation pressure (see e.g. “Mechanics of Pneumatic Tires, 2^ndEd,” Samuel K. Clark, ed., Chapter 7). FIG. 4 and FIG. 5 provide a schematic representation of a complex belt design where the left tread reinforcing layer 115, the right tread reinforcing layer 125, and the central tread reinforcing layer 135 form a continuous belt design, which is convex in the outer portions and concave in the central portion. In the embodiments described, the tread reinforcing layers comprise a plurality of reinforcement elements of substantially parallel reinforcements arranged in opposing layers, and each of the opposing layers has a bias angle β relative to the circumferential direction. The material for the reinforcement elements may be chosen from any of the materials known to tire designers for use as belt materials. For example, steel cords, nylon, polyamide, and glass reinforcements may be suitable. As shown in FIG. 6, the bias angle β is the included angle between the cord direction and the circumferential direction of the tire. The bias angles β of the tread reinforcing layers may be equal in magnitude and opposite in direction relative to the circumferential direction for each opposing layer. It is within the scope of the invention that the opposing layers comprise bias angles β that are not equal and opposite as well as reinforcements that may be linear in form or may be nonlinear in form, such as wavy reinforcements. As used herein, the concept of wavy includes reinforcements whose bias angle β may vary in the axial direction across the width of the reinforcement.

An approach to specifying these parameters will now be described. As used herein, the subscript 1 indicates properties of the central tread reinforcing layer that is concave and subscript 2 refers to the tread reinforcing layers that are convex. To achieve the desired shape, the concave central tread reinforcing layer 135 must have a bias angle β₁that is less the bias angle β₂for the left and right tread reinforcing layers 115 and 125. The ln addition, the crown radius r_C1of the central tread reinforcing layer 135 must be less than the crown radius r_C2of the left and right tread reinforcing layers 115 and 125. These parameters, as well as equator radii r_eof the reinforcing layers, bias angles β₁and β₂, and the radial location of the joints between the reinforcing layers provide a number of design parameters that may be varied to achieve the desired complex membrane shape.

To understand better the methods by which the parameters of the reinforcing layers may be specified, it is necessary to introduce the concept of a critical value of the belt bias angle β_cin a bias ply membrane. As used herein, β_cis the bias belt angle corresponding the point on the membrane equilibrium curve where r=r_c. The critical belt angle β_c_—_critis defined as the bias angle β_ccorresponding to a membrane equilibrium curve having an infinite radius of curvature at r=r_c. That is to say, when the bias angle β_cis equal to the critical belt angle β_c_—_crit, is, the membrane equilibrium curve is flat.

Shape of the Bias Membrane when β_cis Above the Critical Belt Angle:

Turning to FIG. 7, consider the shape of the bias membrane when P is above the critical belt angle. This shape can be described by the equation below which is derived from equilibrium membrane theory:

$\frac{\partial x}{\partial r} = \frac{(r^{2} - r_{e}^{2}) {(r_{c}^{2} - r^{2} \cos^{2} β_{c})}^{1 / 2}}{{[(r_{c}^{2} - r_{e}^{2}) (r_{c}^{2} \sin^{2} β_{c}) - {(r^{2} - r_{e}^{2})}^{2} (r_{c}^{2} - r^{2} \cos^{2} β_{c})]}^{1 / 2}}$

The denominator of this equation has three roots R1, R2, and R3 corresponding to maximum and minimum points of the equilibrium shape. At these points, the slope dz/dr is infinite, and a tangent to the curve at these points would be perfectly horizontal.

R1,R3=½{(r_c²tan²β_c+2r_e²) custom-character r_ctan β_c[r_c²tan²β_c+4(r_c²−r_e²)]^1/2}

R2=r_c

In addition, there are two points where the numerator of the slope equation is zero and the curve is vertical. These zeros occur at:

$Z 1 = r_{e}$

$Z 2 = \frac{r_{c}}{\cos β_{c}}$

Note that the second zero is at the maximum possible radius of the membrane corresponding to a bias angle of zero. This represents the point at which the bias membrane would be oriented in the circumferential direction creating a hoop. This radius obviously cannot be exceeded.

To examine the shape of the membrane at different radii, the slope equation may be evaluated. An example case with r_e=250, r_c=300, β_c=30 is examined in Table 1 below. Radii at each denominator root and numerator zero are evaluated, as well as at sample radii between and above or below these values. In addition, the angle φ, radius of curvature r1 and bias angle β as defined in the membrane theory notes are evaluated. Note that r_cis indicated in the FIG. 7 with a small triangle.

TABLE 1

Membrane Equation Values at Various Radii for r_e= 250, r_c= 300, βc = 30 deg.

R(mm)
dx/dr
φ (deg)
r₁(mm)
β (deg)

r = 200
0 − 1.5079i
−90 + 45.749i
36.91
54.736

R1 = 212.36
∞
−90
36.712
52.191

r = 230
0.6121
−31.472
37.305
48.398

Z1 = r_e= 250
0
0
39.727
43.806

r = 275
−0.7129
35.483
48.246
37.453

R2 = r_c= 300
−∞
90
84.615
30

r = 315
0 − 2.2923i
90 − 26.79i
451.71
24.588

R3 = 331.52
∞
90
−53.054
16.862

r = 340
1.0985
47.687
−20.977
11.039

Z2 = Rmax = 346.41
0
0
0
0

r = 350
0 + 0.5329i
0 + 34.047i
0 − 10.468i
0 + 8.2415i

The first radius r=200 results in an imaginary solution (denoted by the imaginary component ‘I”) to the slope equation, which indicates that the membrane shape does not exist below R1. From R1 to R2, the values correspond to the bias membrane shape as defined by basic membrane theory. At a radius just above R2 of 315, an imaginary solution is found again indicating that the equilibrium curve does not exist at this radius. From R3 to Rmax, real values of the membrane equations indicate that another portion of the curve exists at a radius above that of the basic membrane shape. At R3, the angle φ is 90 degrees but the radius of curvature R1 is negative. Note that this is equivalent to an angle φ of −90 degrees with a positive radius of curvature, indicating a shape that is concave. At Rmax, the curve is apparently vertical. At a radius beyond Rmax, the solutions to the equations are again imaginary as expected since Rmax is the maximum possible radius of the membrane.

Shape of the Bias Membrane when β_cis Equal to the Critical Belt Angle:

The shape of the membrane curves at the critical belt angle is shown in FIG. 8. The two curves touch at r=r_c, as shown by the small triangle located at the equatorial plane of the tire. The membrane shape is clearly wide and flat at this point. Note that the curves in the plot are not infinitely wide because the computed critical belt angle is rounded to two decimal places.

The critical belt angle for the given membrane parameters can be computed directly as described in membrane theory.

$β_{c_crit} = \arccos (\sqrt{\frac{2}{3 - \frac{r_{e}^{2}}{r_{c}^{2}}}})$

For the given example parameters, β_c_—_critis 21.34 deg. At this angle, the resulting roots R2 and R3 are equal. Table 2 shows a similar analysis of a range of radii to verify the existence of a solution to the membrane shape. Note that here there is no middle range between R2 and R3 at which the curve does not exist because the two curves touch at this point. Also, note that r1 is infinite at this point, corresponding to an infinitely flat belt.

TABLE 1

Membrane Equation Values at Various Radii for r_e= 250,

r_c= 300, β_c= 21.34 deg.

r
dx/dr
φ (deg)
r₁
β (deg)

r = 200
0 − 1.2144i
−90 + 66.886i
27.129
51.614

R1 = 220.8
∞
−90
27.668
46.721

r = 230
0.90633
−42.187
28.396
44.43

Z1 = r_e= 250
0
0
31.745
39.086

r = 275
−0.93445
43.059
45.596
31.371

R2 = R3 = r_c= 300
∞
90
∞
21.34

r = 315
1.1893
49.941
−24.814
12.038

Z2 = Rmax = 322.08
0
0
0
0

r = 350
0 + 0.93097i
0 + 495.431i
0 − 12.934i
0 + 23.687i

Shape of the Bias Membrane when β_cis Below the Critical Belt Angle:

To examine the shape of the membrane at angles of β_cbelow the critical belt angle, the equations for various radii are again examined in

Table 2 below for β_c=15 deg. The value of R3 is now less than that of R2=r_c. Between R3 and R2 the solution to the slope equation again becomes imaginary, indicating the existence of two distinct curves just as before.

TABLE 2

Membrane Equation Values at Various Radii for r_e= 250, r_c= 300, β_c= 15 deg.

r
dx/dr
φ (deg)
r₁
β (deg)

r = 200
0 − 1.0983i
−90 + 87.693i
19.394
49.913

R1 = 228.07
∞
−90
20.562
42.75

r = 240
0.4858
−25.911
21.976
39.399

Z1 = r_e= 250
0
0
23.991
36.396

r = 65
−0.68663
34.475
30.195
31.435

R3 = 281.86
−∞
90
59.888
24.834

r = 290
0 − 2.5589i
90 − 23.648i
271.34
20.976

R2 = r_c= 300
∞
90
−40.635
15

r = 305
1.3788
54.048
−17.965
10.88

Z2 = Rmax = 310.58
0
0
0
0

350
0 + 0.97491i
0 + 125.07i
0 − 9.0935i
0 + 28.569i

The shape of the membrane for βc=15 deg. is shown in FIG. 9. Note that r_c, as indicated by the triangle, no longer corresponds to the crown of the bottom curve but instead is the base of the upper curve. This upper curve corresponding to a belt angle βc less that the critical belt angle can be used to form a concave portion of the complex belt. Instead the crown of the lower curve is now located at R3.

Therefore, an exemplary embodiment of the tire 100 may be obtained with a shape of the tread reinforcement that has a central tread reinforcing layer 135 that has a concave shape and a left tread reinforcing layer 115 and a right tread reinforcing layer 125 in each of the tread portions, each of which has a convex shape. These tread reinforcing layers may be joined laterally to the central reinforcing layer to create a reinforcing layer that extends the full width of the tire.

An inventive principle of tire 100 having a complex belt design is to specify the bias angles β of the reinforcement elements in each of the reinforcing layers to achieve separate equilibrium membrane shapes that are joined together to create the continuous, complex shape. The concave curve is constructed from the computed values of the angle φ and the radius R1 just as the convex curves are constructed as described using membrane theory. The angle of the reinforcements in the central tread reinforcing layer 135 must be lower than the critical belt angle, therefore the shape will be concave, and r_c1will not actually be the “crown” of this reinforcing layer.

In order to create a shape that is physically realizable, the slopes ΔR/ΔZ of the profile of the tread reinforcing layers must be the equal at the joint locations. This slope may be defined by the angle φ of the reinforcing layers, as shown in FIG. 6. In addition, for the complex membrane shape to be in a state of stress equilibrium, the stress N_φ of both reinforcing layers must be the same at the joint location. These equilibrium conditions result in constraints on some of the design parameters.

First, an equator radius r_e1the central tread reinforcing layer 135 and an equator radius r_e2of the left and right tread reinforcing layers 115 and 125 will be determined. As described above, the equilibrium shape of a complex membrane requires the following constraints at the joint:

φ_1,j=φ_2,j

N
_φ1,j
=N
_φ2,j

From equilibrium membrane theory, the angle φ and the stress N_φ are related by:

$N_{φ} = P \frac{r^{2} - r_{e}^{2}}{2 r \sin φ}$

The joint location may be defined by a joint radius r_J. Therefore, each of the reinforcing layers layer must satisfy the following condition:

$N_{φi, j} = P \frac{r_{j}^{2} - r_{ei}^{2}}{2 r_{j} \sin φ_{i, j}}$

Where: i designates the respective layer.

Thus the angle φ and stress N_φ of each reinforcing layers will be equal at the joint radius only if r_e1=r_e2. In other words, if each reinforcing layer has the same equator radius r_e, then the stress N_φ at the joint will be in equilibrium when φ1=φ2 at the joint radius r_J.

Next, the joint location will be determined. The crown radius r_C2of the left and right tread reinforcing layers 115 and 125 will define the outer radius of the belt package, and the crown radius r_C1will define the inner radius of the belt package. The bottom of central tread reinforcing layer 135 is defined by the crown radius r_C1. The groove depth at the center of the tire will be defined simply as r_C2−r_C1.

The bias belt angles β_c1and β_c2may also be constrained design parameters since their values will likely be limited by manufacturing concerns. With these parameters defined the joint radius r_Jmay be determined by setting the angles φ1j and φ2j equal. The equation for angle φ (of membrane i at joint radius r_J) from membrane theory is:

$\sin φ_{i, j} = {\frac{r_{j}^{2} - r_{e}^{2}}{r_{ci}^{2} - r_{e}^{2}} [\frac{r_{ci}^{2} - r_{j}^{2} \cos^{2} β_{ci}}{r_{ci}^{2} \sin^{2} β_{ci}}]}^{1 / 2}$

Setting φ1j=φ2j and solving for r_J:

$r_{j} = {[\frac{{(r_{c 1}^{2} - r_{e}^{2})}^{2} r_{c 1}^{2} \sin^{2} β_{c 1} r_{c 2}^{2} - {(r_{c 2}^{2} - r_{e}^{2})}^{2} r_{c 2}^{2} \sin^{2} β_{c 2} r_{c 1}^{2}}{{(r_{c 1}^{2} - r_{e}^{2})}^{2} r_{c 1}^{2} \sin^{2} β_{c 1} \cos^{2} β_{c 2} - {(r_{c 2}^{2} - r_{e}^{2})}^{2} r_{c 2}^{2} \sin^{2} β_{c 2} \cos^{2} β_{c 1}}]}^{1 / 2}$

Once r_Jis defined, φ and Nφ at the joint can be calculated and the parameters of the complex membrane are fully defined.

With the complex membrane parameters defined, the design parameters that determine the shape can be examined and then optimized. Since no analytical function exists for the shape, numerical methods can be used to draw the shape of each membrane from the crown to the joint. From the resulting shape the widths of each belt and the overall belt package can be determined. Further tuning of r_e1, r_e2and the bias belt angles βc1 and βc2 within the acceptable range for manufacturing can be used to optimize the shape and belt widths for the given max belt radius rc2 and belt groove depth.

Example Design:

FIG. 3, FIG. 4 and FIG. 10 show conceptual views of an example design of the complex belt according to the invention now having tread reinforcing layers 115, 125, and 135 having reinforcement elements of substantially linear reinforcements arranged in opposing layers or belt plies, and each of the opposing layers has a bias angle β relative to the circumferential direction (see FIG. 6). The bias angles β are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction relative to the circumferential direction for each opposing layer. It is within the scope of the invention that the opposing layers comprise bias angles β that are not equal and opposite as well as reinforcements that may not be linear, such as wavy reinforcements. Furthermore, for manufacturing ease, the reinforcements may be embedded in an uncured rubber layer. The three-dimensional schematics are idealized views of the belt cords. The cords illustrate the cord paths within the belts, however the figures show the cords spaced further apart than they would be in an actual belt.

FIG. 10 depicts a meridian profile of the tire 100 having a complex belt arrangement. The central belt plies 136 and 137 of the central tread reinforcement layer 135 are applied at a small bias angle, which less than the critical angle. The left belt plies 116 and 127 of the left tread reinforcement layer 115 are applied at a larger bias angle, which greater than the critical angle. The right belt plies 126 and 127 of the right tread reinforcement layer 115 are also applied at a larger bias angle, which greater than the critical angle. This design has an outer radius of 300 mm and a groove depth of 10 mm. The design was optimized to produce a belt package with overall width around 250 mm corresponding to a tire 100 of a size 335/25ZR20.

As the complex belt shape is not known to one skilled in the art, it will be useful to address some tire construction process considerations. An approach to constructing a prototype tire as shown in FIG. 11 may be to use a tire building form 150 having a complex transverse profile that is not of a cylindrical shape as may be used for conventional tires. In this case, separate central belt plies 136 and 137 would be used for the central tread reinforcing section 135. Likewise, separate left belt plies 116 and 117 would be used for the left tread reinforcing section 115, and separate right belt plies 126 and 127 would be used for the right tread reinforcing section 125. The tire building form 150 may be employed to lay the belts at the desired radii. Such a process could potentially be used in industrial production; however, additional equipment and process time to produce such a tire may be incurred. Therefore, it is within the scope of the invention to imagine other flexible tire manufacturing process to achieve the complex profile of the tire 100.

It is common in the construction of tires to apply the belt plies at a radius slightly less than the final radius in the cured tire to accommodate the clearances necessary to load of the tire in a curing mold. During the molding of the tire the belt plies are forced radially outward to their final position. This radial movement causes the belt angles to be reduced to accommodate the new radius which is larger than the radius at which the belts were applied. This effect is referred to as pantographing since the geometric change is similar to a pantograph mechanism. When the belt plies are applied at a small angle such as the exemplary range of 10 to 15 degrees, it may be difficult to achieve the desired pantographing, and the belts must be posed very near their final radius. The central belt plies 136 and 137 pose this problem since they are at such a shallow bias angle. In the example shown herein, the central belt plies 136 and 137 have a bias angle of 11.95 deg at a radius of 310 mm. These belts are limited to a maximum of 6.9 mm growth in radius before the belt angles become nearly circumferential. It should be further recognized that any such belt movement would also be accompanied by an undesirable reduction in belt width. A tire building form 150 having a complex transverse profile having a central groove 155 will help to minimize this problem.

An approach to multiple belt layers, known in the art, is to apply continuous belt plies corresponding to the left and right tread reinforcing layers across the full width, and then to apply belt plies of the central tread reinforcing layer 135 radially outward of the left and right tread reinforcing layers. However, laying the continuous plies across the tire building form 150 with a central groove 155 causes significant manufacturing problems. In an embodiment of the tire 100, the tire is manufactured using separate reinforcing layers forming butt joints at the lateral extremities of the belt plies. FIG. 10 represents the most basic form of the butt joints where the all belt plies end at a common axial distance equal to the width of the central tread reinforcing layers section 135.

Another proposed arrangement of the belt plies on a tire building form 150 having a complex transverse profile is shown in FIG. 11. In this arrangement, the central belt plies 136 and 137 are applied in the central groove 155 at a radius very close their final radius. In addition, left belt plies 116 and 117 and the right belt plies 126 and 127 are applied at a radius very close to their final crown radius on the lateral sections 156 and 157 of the tire building form 150. As shown in FIG. 11, the lateral sections 156 and 157 have a cylindrical shape. However, it is within the scope of the invention to optimize further the transverse profiles of the lateral sections 156 and 157 comprising more complex profiles that have been illustrated herein.

It is important for the durability of the tire to provide a capability to transfer the shear stresses in the rubber skim layers of the belt plies from one belt ply to another. FIGS. 11 and 12a shows an example having a simple overlap portion where the number of belt plies or reinforcing elements remains constant across the joint. Specifically for the example of FIG. 12a that the left belt ply 116 terminates at a position axially inward from the end of the belt ply 117 to form an overlap portion with the central belt plies 136 and 137. Similarly, on the right side of the tire 100, the right belt ply 126 terminates at a position axially inward from the end of the belt ply 127 to form an overlap portion with the central belt plies 136 and 137. Therefore, an overlap portion of width w₁is created. The amount of overlap width w₁may be a function of the intended use of the tire and would vary accordingly. In this example, the shear stresses are transferred through a single layer of rubber skim layer at the interfaces between the belt plies. The respective belt plies would be applied such that the plies 116, 126, and 136 would have the same sense of the bias angle β. The respective belt angles the plies 117, 127, and 137 would have the opposite sense of the bias angle β.

FIG. 12
b depicts an alternative example of the belt ply overlap whose object is to improve the transfer of shear stresses between the belt plies. In this example, the amount of overlap is increased such that three belt plies overlap at the interface. This would both strengthen the belt package at the joint and provide substantially more area for transfer of shear stresses in the rubber skim layers. In the example shown, the belt ply 116 terminates at a position axially inward of the belt ply 136 to form a first overlap of width w_2A. The belt ply 117 terminates axially outward of the end of belt ply 116 and abuts belt ply 136. Finally, belt ply 137 terminates a position axially outward of the end of belt ply 117 to form a second overlap of width w_2B. The first and second overlaps of width w_2Aand w_2Bcombine to form an overlap zone of width w₂. In general, it would be expected that the overlap w₂would be greater than the overlap portion w₁of the previous example. In this manner, the joints have significantly more area for transfer of the shear stresses. In the example shown, the belt ply 136 would have a left-hand orientation and the belt ply 137 a right-hand orientation of the bias angle β. This will provide a left-right-left orientation of the three plies within the joint region. It should be noted that in these overlap portions, the path of the complex belt arrangement may depart from the ideal shapes to accommodate the multiple belt ply layers. In this instance, it is desirable to attempt to have the central plane belt plies conform as closely as possible to the ideal shape.

In a second exemplary embodiment, a tire 200 has tread reinforcing layers wherein the bias angle β of the reinforcements varies continuously in the axial direction. The tire 200 shown in FIG. 13 has the same or similar external appearance as the tire 100 depicted in FIG. 2. That is, the tire 200 comprises a left tread portion 210 and a right tread portion 220, wherein the tread portions are axially separated by a longitudinally oriented groove 230. In this exemplary embodiment of tire 200, the groove 230 is much wider and deeper than the grooves commonly found on conventional pneumatic tires. It is possible for one or more of the tread reinforcing layers to have a continuously varying bias angle β of the reinforcement elements in the axial direction of the tire 200. The individual tread reinforcing layers may be joined as described above for the tire 100. It is also possible to have tread reinforcement that is a single, unitary or continuous, tread reinforcing layer extending the width of the tire in which the bias angles β of the reinforcement elements are continuously variable in the axial direction. This arrangement is depicted in FIG. 15. In this instance, the reinforcement elements also extend the width of the tire.

As will be described herebelow, the use of tread reinforcing layers with a continuously varying angle of the reinforcements has an advantageous result that permits an arbitrary shape to the tread reinforcing layer. This arbitrary shape is realized by varying the angle β in the same manner as described previously for the tire 100 to maintain the equilibrium shape of the membrane. FIG. 14 depicts a profile complex belt arrangement in a meridian plane of the tire 200 comprising discrete segments of the continuously varying tread reinforcements. The shape depicted in FIG. 14 has a flat, or cylindrical, shape of the reinforcement layer throughout most of the left tread portion and the right tread portion of the tire 200. For very wide, low profile tires, such a flat tread profile is advantageous for many performance parameters. Beginning at the left axial extent, the tread reinforcing layer has a left outer convex section 213, a left flat section 215, a left inner convex section 217, a left inner concave section 219 and a flat central section 235. Beginning at the right axial extent, the tread reinforcing layer has a right outer convex section 223, a right flat section 225, and a right inner convex section 227, and a right inner concave section 229. This example is non-limiting in its use of the flat sections in the tread and the central section. It is within the scope of the invention for the left flat section 215 and the right flat section 225 to also be convex, similar to the design of the tire 100. Similarly, the central section 213 may be concave, similar to the design of the tire 100.

The bias angle β of the curves may be determined by using the membrane equilibrium equations. The desired curves provide a radius of curvature and angle phi at each point of the curve. The membrane equilibrium equations can then be solved at each point to determine the corresponding r_cand β_cof the curve.

r
_c
=f′(r_e,r,r₁,φ)

β_c=g′(r_e,r,r₁,φ)

At certain points of the curve the radius of curvature may be too large or too small to be realized by a membrane curve in equilibrium, or the bias angle β may need to be restricted to a reasonable range due to manufacturability concerns. In this case values of r_cand β_cthat provide an approximation of the desired radius of curvature may be selected, or the desired curve may be modified to ensure that a realizable solution may be determined at each point.

With the values of r_cand β_cdetermined at each point of the curve, the angle β of the reinforcement elements may be determined using the normal law of conformation. The bias angles β required for tire 200 are depicted in FIG. 15 as a function of the axial distance from the centerline of the tire 200. Note that in the left flat section 215 and the right flat section 225, the bias angle β is constant and corresponds to the critical belt angle for the radius of those sections. Similarly other sections of the curve the bias angle β varies, but retains the characteristic that the angle is below the critical belt angle in sections that are convex and above the critical belt angle in sections that are concave. FIG. 16 depicts the resulting equilibrium membrane shape in three dimensions with the cord paths of the reinforcement elements shown.

The continuous variation of the bias angles 3 across the width of the tire may be accomplished by preparing individual cords with the specified angle variation along the axis of the cord, and thereafter applying a plurality of these cords to the carcass of a tire. One such method and apparatus for applying the cords to the carcass of the tire is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,505,802, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety and for all purposes. In this reference, the tire carcass is manufactured on a rigid form whose shape is close to the desired shape of the cured tire. The cords are applied to an exposed layer of uncured rubber in sequential fashion until the belt ply is completed. Then another layer of uncured rubber is applied on top of the cords. The process of applying the cords is then repeated with the cords oriented into the opposite direction to eventually form a bias ply. An advantage of building the tire on such a rigid form is there is little or no conformation of the belt during curing of the tire.

While the present subject matter has been described in detail with respect to specific exemplary embodiments and methods thereof, it will be appreciated that those skilled in the art, upon attaining an understanding of the foregoing may readily produce alterations to, variations of, and equivalents to such embodiments. Accordingly, the scope of the present disclosure is by way of example rather than by way of limitation, and the subject disclosure does not preclude inclusion of such modifications, variations and/or additions to the present subject matter as would be readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art.

TIRE WITH COMPLEX BELTS

Information

Publication Number

Date Filed

Date Published

Inventors

Original Assignees

CPC

US Classifications

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

PCT Information

Provisional Applications (1)