The present invention relates to the cleaning, inspection, and maintenance of tires and wheels. Specifically, the present invention pertains to a tire work stand apparatus for rotating a tire, either mounted or unmounted, where the loading and unloading of the tire onto and off the work stand is eased by an automatic roller brake device.
A tire work stand, and in particular a portable tire work stand, simplifies inspection of unmounted or mounted tires (especially useful for large, heavy truck tires). Tire work stands exist but their design do not facilitate easy loading and unloading, Portable roller stands having a typical ramp-style loading system are not satisfactory for use with a tire that is not attached to a vehicle. For example, US Patent Application Publication US 2010/020862 shows an apparatus for vehicle wheel maintenance having a pair of spaced apart rollers and a loading bar such that the rear wheel of a motorcycle can be rolled onto the stand such that the tire rests between the rollers. This allows rotation of the tire. US Patent Application Publication US 2007/0138112 A1 discloses a wheel rotation device having a pair of spaced apart rollers and an inclined ramp extending from one of the rollers at a shallow angle to promote loading the tire on the stand.
Upon scrutiny of these devices, however, it should become apparent that the dimensions of these devices would not allow them to be useful for inspection of heavy tires, like heavy duty truck tires. In particular, these devices are not satisfactory for use when the tire is not attached to a vehicle. The usual method of loading/unloading a heavy tire onto/from a portable roller stand is to include a ramped platform that can allow the tire to be rolled up/down a small incline which transitions between floor level and roller-top level. This method is satisfactory if the tire to to be inspected is mounted on a small vehicle (such as a motorcycle, for instance) that is being pushed onto the roller stand. In the case of loading an unmounted tire or tire and wheel assembly onto the tire work stand the force vectors to load the tire are opposite and lead to unsatisfactory performance for a tire not mounted on a vehicle. When the tire is pushed against the roller the tire imposes a force vector on the roller that is in the opposite rotation to the force vector imposed on the roller by the tire of a vehicle being pushed. As a result of this difference, a simple ramp is sufficient, for example, for a motorcycle roller stand. However, for a tire work stand, the force vector in the oppisite direction inhibits the ability of the tire to rise over the roller and to seat on the stand iteself
A new type of device having a brake feature on the ramp to prevent rotation of the roller overcomes these defficiencies and makes it uniquely suited for use as a tire work stand. The concept would also work equally well for applications such as a as a motorcycle roller stand.
Aspects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the following description, or may be obvious from the description, or may be learned through practice of the invention.
A tire work stand comprises a frame for supporting the tire work stand on a ground surface and for attaching a set of components of the tire work stand. A plurality of rollers is attached to the frame to support a tire above the ground surface and to permit rotation of the tire during inspection of the tire. The rollers are rotatable about an axis of rotation concentric with an axis of the rollers. A ramp is configured to have a first ramp end capable of extending from the ground surface and a second ramp end extending to a position proximal to the frame. A bridge is configured to have a first bridge end extending from the second ramp end and a second bridge end extending to a position proximal to a surface of at least one of the rollers, wherein the bridge acts to inhibit rotation of the roller during loading of the tire and further permits rotation of the tire after the tire has been loaded on the tire work stand.
The frame is in frictional contact with the ground surface to aid in the stability of the tire work stand. In one embodiment, the frame comprises a set of supports mounted to the frame and in frictional contact with the ground surface and arranged on the frame so as to provide a gap between the frame and the ground surface.
The ramp comprises a hinge located on the ramp to permit rotation of the ramp such that the first ramp end is movable from a position in contact with the ground surface to a position away from the ground surface.
A first bridge end of the tire work stand comprises a hinge to permit rotation of the second bridge end from a position in contact with the roller to a position away from the roller. The position of the hinge relative to the frame is adjustable so as to maintain a clearance between the tire and the bridge when the tire is in a position for inspection.
In another variation, the first bridge end is rigidly attached to the frame, and the second bridge end extends from the frame to a position proximal to a surface of at least one of the rollers, and wherein a gap between the second bridge end and the roller is maintained when no load is applied to the ramp.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following description and appended claims. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
A full and enabling disclosure of the present invention, including the best mode thereof, directed to one of ordinary skill in the art, is set forth in the specification, which makes reference to the appended figures, in which:
The use of identical or similar reference numerals in different figures denotes identical or similar features.
A common requirement for the maintenance of tires and tire and wheel assemblies is to perform a visual inspection of the tire for signs of wear or injury that may make the tire unsuitable for further service. A tire work stand will typically comprise a frame that is comprises a pair of spaced apart and parallel aligned rollers. The rollers allow the tire to freely rotate for inspection. For small tires, it is possible to lift the tire directly onto the frame so that it rests on the rollers, but for heavy tires or tire and wheel assemblies, such as those used for heavy duty truck tires, it is not possible to lift the tire without assistance from a lifting device such as a hoist.
When one attempts to load a tire that is not attached to a vehicle onto a tire work stand, the forces are very different. In most cases, an operator will push on the tread of the tire to cause a torque to rotate the tire and have it ascend the ramp 17 and to approach the roller. This torque represented by the dotted arrow on the tire in
An embodiment of an improved tire work stand 100 is shown
Referring now to
L=(RT+RR)−h0 and h02=(RT+RR)2−(W/2)2
where:
For the ease of loading of the tire, and more importantly, for the ease of unloading the tire, the lift L should be minimized. For a work stand as known in the prior art, the tire will undergo the full lift L during loading and unloading. To accomplish this, the tire must be rotated through and angle α0 defined (and illustrated in
α0=sin−1[W/(2·(RT+RR)]
For a tire work stand 100 that is dimensionally sized to accommodate a typical heavy truck tire of size 275/80R22.5, the tire 10 will have a diameter of about 1018 mm (RT=509 mm) and the roller 120 will have a diameter of about 50 mm (RR=25 mm), spaced apart about by a distance W=400 mm. Applying these date to the equations above obtains the a value of L≈495 mm, a value of h0≈39 mm and a value of α0≈22 degrees.
Turning now to
Referring again to
Referring now to
In still another embodiment (not shown), the ramp 130 and the bridge 145 may comprise a unitary component which may be rigidly attached to the frame 110 as for the bridge 145 depicted in
The dimensions of the tire work stand 100 may be specified to accommodate different sizes and types of tires. For example, the axial length of the rollers, and hence, the width of the frame 110, would be specified according to the tread width of the tire 10. For the embodiments shown in the attached Figures, the rollers 120 have a cylindrical shape and the radius RR of the rollers is constant along an axial length of the rollers 120. However, if the tire 10 has a very round cross-section to its tread, as often found on motorcycle tires, then the rollers 120 may have cylindrical shape and a radius of the rollers is variable along an axial length of the rollers. For a motorcycle tire, it may be advantageous to have the minimum radius in the center of that length of the roller 120 to urge the tire to self-center on the rollers 120. The rollers 120 used for a prototype tire work stand 100 are of a ball bearing construction and have a diameter between 40 mm and 60 mm. The diameter may be varied; for example, increased to obtain higher load capacity for larger tires.
To solidly locate the tire work stand 100 on the ground surface, it will be advantageous for a bottom surface of the frame to be in frictional contact with the ground surface. To accomplish this, a set of supports 115 may be mounted to the frame 110 and in frictional contact with the ground surface and arranged on the frame 110 so as to provide a gap between the frame and the ground surface.
The longitudinal length of the tire work stand 100 is determined by the range of tire diameters for which the work stand 100 will be used, as well as the need to maintain a gap between the frame and the ground surface. It is apparent from
where:
The gap between the ground surface may be altered by changing the height above the ground at which the rollers 120 are mounted or by altering the vertical dimension of the supports 115. The tire work stand 100 may more readily accept different sizes of tires when the frame 110 is adjustable to vary the length W between the axes of rotation of the rollers 120 (not shown). For the example tire 10 of size 275/80R22.5, the longitudinal distance W between the axes of rotation of the rollers 120 is about 400 mm. This dimension has been found to work effectively for a range of tire sizes that includes motorcycle tires through small earthmover tires. The important element is that the tire 10 does not interfere with the bridge 140 when the tire 10 is loaded onto the tire work stand 100. This can be avoided with either by adjusting the spacing W between the rollers 120 or adjusting the position of second bridge end 142 relative to the roller 120. The frame 110 can be made adjustable by a variety of means. For example, the elements of the frame 110 can be made telescopic to allow adjustability.
While the present subject matter has been described in detail with respect to specific embodiments and methods thereof, it will be appreciated that those skilled in the art, upon attaining an understanding of the foregoing may readily produce alterations to, variations of, and equivalents to such embodiments. Accordingly, the scope of the present disclosure is by way of example rather than by way of limitation, and the subject disclosure does not preclude inclusion of such modifications, variations and/or additions to the present subject matter as would be readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art.
This application is a continuation of prior U.S. application Ser. No. 13/625,173 filed Sep. 24, 2012, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2542 | Brown et al. | Apr 1842 | A |
256936 | Wicksteed | Apr 1882 | A |
322057 | Hart | Jul 1885 | A |
342187 | Cornell | May 1886 | A |
350243 | Gump | Oct 1886 | A |
372604 | Craig | Nov 1887 | A |
556758 | Lefebre, Jr. | Mar 1896 | A |
556789 | Walker | Mar 1896 | A |
567625 | Waterman | Sep 1896 | A |
573811 | Benton | Dec 1896 | A |
653048 | Wigg | Jul 1900 | A |
698231 | Starzman | Apr 1902 | A |
1047048 | Harrison | Dec 1912 | A |
1131477 | Crofoot | Mar 1915 | A |
1354774 | Metzger | Oct 1920 | A |
1569737 | Fording | Jan 1926 | A |
1628306 | Clark | May 1927 | A |
1665887 | Lind | Apr 1928 | A |
1901360 | Snow | Mar 1933 | A |
1902611 | Blackman | Mar 1933 | A |
2012635 | Paden | Aug 1935 | A |
2910201 | Finn | Oct 1959 | A |
3107915 | Looney | Oct 1963 | A |
3510007 | Walklet et al. | May 1970 | A |
3812974 | Sylvester | May 1974 | A |
3856264 | Thumma | Dec 1974 | A |
3865244 | Galen | Feb 1975 | A |
4140191 | Hickey | Feb 1979 | A |
4317476 | Radzik | Mar 1982 | A |
4550835 | Lynch | Nov 1985 | A |
4562904 | Kelley | Jan 1986 | A |
4802594 | Graber | Feb 1989 | A |
4913615 | Ward | Apr 1990 | A |
5039123 | Smeitink | Aug 1991 | A |
5069348 | Long | Dec 1991 | A |
5248235 | Poten et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5626241 | Holden | May 1997 | A |
5735410 | Kallstrom | Apr 1998 | A |
5749475 | Krebs | May 1998 | A |
5944198 | Ihalainen | Aug 1999 | A |
5988402 | Mayfield | Nov 1999 | A |
D428221 | Johnson | Jul 2000 | S |
6520344 | Graham | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6540470 | Johnson | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6575310 | Chamoun | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6581785 | Falkenstein | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6640979 | Mayfield | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6755309 | Runge | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6935619 | Chamoun | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7150359 | Lyons et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7694830 | Larson | Apr 2010 | B1 |
D640854 | Leum | Jun 2011 | S |
7988402 | Adams | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8002122 | Kniegge | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8074314 | Lucht | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8104588 | Curlee et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8256053 | Astor et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
9056640 | Vineyard | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9199511 | Hodges | Dec 2015 | B2 |
20010023939 | Johnson | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010050260 | Graham | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020109130 | Chamoun | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030010729 | Lopez De Luzuriaga | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040046160 | Chamoun | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20070138112 | Meyer | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070237613 | Randers | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090001031 | Hutchinson, II | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090016865 | Astor et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090300859 | Lucht | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100065714 | Curlee et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100092270 | Adams | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100202862 | Kniegge | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20120224940 | Andrews | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130270201 | Vineyard | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140084530 | Hodges | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
375973 | Jul 1932 | GB |
2123368 | Feb 1984 | GB |
2202504 | Sep 1988 | GB |
Entry |
---|
http://www.harborfreight.com/motorcycle-wheel-cleaning-stand-98800.html (Web page dated Feb. 6, 2012). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160046148 A1 | Feb 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13625173 | Sep 2012 | US |
Child | 14923563 | US |