Tissue rejection

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20060269948
  • Publication Number
    20060269948
  • Date Filed
    May 15, 2006
    18 years ago
  • Date Published
    November 30, 2006
    18 years ago
Abstract
This document relates to methods and materials involved in detecting tissue rejection (e.g., organ rejection). For example, this document relates to methods and materials involved in the early detection of kidney tissue rejection.
Description
BACKGROUND

1. Technical Field


This document relates to methods and materials involved in tissue rejection (e.g., organ rejection) and detecting tissue rejection.


2. Background Information


The transplantation of tissue from one mammal to another has been used for years to save lives and to improve the quality of lives. For example, the first successful kidney transplant was performed in the mid-1950s between identical twin brothers. Since then, donors have grown to include not only close relatives but also distant relatives, friends, and total strangers. In some cases, the recipient may reject the transplanted tissue. Thus, tissue rejection is a concern for any recipient of transplanted tissue. If a doctor is able to recognize early signs of tissue rejection, anti-rejection medication often can be used to reverse tissue rejection.


SUMMARY

This document relates to methods and materials involved in detecting tissue rejection (e.g., organ rejection). More particularly, this document relates to methods and materials involved in the early detection of tissue rejection (e.g., kidney rejection) and the assessment of a mammal's probability of rejecting tissue such as a transplanted organ. For example, this document provides nucleic acid arrays that can be used to diagnose tissue rejection in a mammal. Such arrays can allow clinicians to diagnose tissue rejection early based on a determination of the expression levels of nucleic acids that are differentially expressed in tissue being rejected as compared to control tissue not being rejected. The differential expression of such nucleic acids can be detected in tissue being rejected prior to the emergence of visually-observable, histological signs of tissue rejection. Early diagnosis of patients rejecting transplanted tissue (e.g., a kidney) can help clinicians determine appropriate treatments for those patients. For example, a clinician who diagnoses a patient as rejecting transplanted tissue can treat that patient with medication that suppresses tissue rejection (e.g., immunosuppressants).


The description provided herein is based, in part, on the discovery of nucleic acids that are differentially expressed in tissue being rejected as compared to control tissue that is not being rejected. Such nucleic acids can be nucleic acids expressed by, for example, cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). The term “CTL associated transcripts” or “CATs” as used herein refers to transcripts that are expressed by activated CTL in culture at a level greater than the level of expression in normal kidney tissue. The description provided herein also is based, in part, on the discovery that the expression levels of CATs can be used to distinguish transplanted tissue that is being rejected from transplanted tissue that is not being rejected. For example, the expression levels of the nucleic acids listed in Table 4 or Table 5 can be assessed in transplanted tissue to determine whether or not that transplanted tissue is being rejected. In addition, the description provided herein is based, in part, on the discovery that the expression levels of CATs can be used to distinguish transplanted tissue that is being rejected from transplanted tissue that is not being rejected at a time point prior to the emergence of any visually-observable, histological sign of tissue rejection (e.g., tubulitis for kidney rejection).


In general, this description features a method for detecting tissue rejection. The method includes determining whether or not tissue transplanted into a mammal contains cells that express at least two of the nucleic acids listed in Table 4 or Table 5, wherein the presence of the cells indicates that the tissue is being rejected. The mammal can be a human. The tissue can be kidney tissue. The tissue can be a kidney. The method can include determining whether or not the tissue contains cells that express at least five of the nucleic acids. The method can include determining whether or not the tissue contains cells that express at least ten of the nucleic acids. The method can include determining whether or not the tissue contains cells that express at least twenty of the nucleic acids. The determining step can include measuring the level of mRNA expressed from the at least two nucleic acids. The determining step can include measuring the level of polypeptide expressed from the at least two nucleic acids. The method can include determining whether or not the tissue contains cells that express at least two of the nucleic acids at a level greater than the average level of expression exhibited in cells from control tissue that has not been transplanted.


In another embodiment, the description features a method for detecting tissue rejection. The method includes determining whether or not a sample contains cells that express at least two of the nucleic acids listed in Table 4 or Table 5, wherein the sample contains cells, was obtained from tissue that was transplanted into a mammal, and was obtained from the tissue within fifteen days of the tissue being transplanted into the mammal, and wherein the presence of the cells indicates that the tissue is being rejected. The mammal can be a human. The tissue can be kidney tissue. The tissue can be a kidney. The method can include determining whether or not the sample contains cells that express at least five of the nucleic acids. The method can include determining whether or not the sample contains cells that express at least ten of the nucleic acids. The method can include determining whether or not the sample contains cells that express at least twenty of the nucleic acids. The determining step can include measuring the level of mRNA expressed from the at least two nucleic acids. The determining step can include measuring the level of polypeptide expressed from the at least two nucleic acids. The sample can be a sample obtained from the tissue within ten days of the tissue being transplanted into the mammal. The sample can be a sample obtained from the tissue within five days of the tissue being transplanted into the mammal. The method can include determining whether or not the sample contains cells that express at least two of the nucleic acids at a level greater than the average level of expression exhibited in cells from control tissue that has not been transplanted.


In another embodiment, this description features a nucleic acid array containing at least 20 nucleic acid molecules, wherein each of the at least 20 nucleic acid molecules has a different nucleic acid sequence, and wherein at least 50 percent of the nucleic acid molecules of the array comprise a sequence from nucleic acid selected from the group consisting of the nucleic acids listed in Table 4 and Table 5. The array can contain at least 50 nucleic acid molecules, wherein each of the at least 50 nucleic acid molecules has a different nucleic acid sequence. The array can contain at least 100 nucleic acid molecules, wherein each of the at least 100 nucleic acid molecules has a different nucleic acid sequence. Each of the nucleic acid molecules that comprise a sequence from nucleic acid selected from the group can contain no more than three mismatches. At least 75 percent of the nucleic acid molecules of the array can contain a sequence from nucleic acid selected from the group. At least 95 percent of the nucleic acid molecules of the array can contain a sequence from nucleic acid selected from the group. The array can contain glass. The at least 20 nucleic acid molecules can contain a sequence present in a human.


In another embodiment, this description features a computer-readable storage medium having instructions stored thereon for causing a programmable processor to determine whether one or more nucleic acids listed in Table 4 or Table 5 are detected in a sample, wherein the sample is from a transplanted tissue. The computer-readable storage medium can further comprise instructions stored thereon for causing a programmable processor to determine whether one or more of the nucleic acids listed in Table 4 or Table 5 is expressed at a greater level in the sample than in a control sample of non-transplanted tissue.


This description also features an apparatus for determining whether a transplanted tissue is being rejected. The apparatus can include one or more collectors for obtaining signals representative of the presence of one or more nucleic acids listed in Table 4 or Table 5 in a sample from the transplanted tissue and a processor for analyzing the signals and determining whether the tissue is being rejected. The one or more collectors can be adapted to obtain further signals representative of the presence of the one or more nucleic acids in a control sample from non-transplanted tissue.


Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention pertains. Although methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present invention, suitable methods and materials are described below. All publications, patent applications, patents, and other references mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety. In case of conflict, the present specification, including definitions, will control. In addition, the materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting.


Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description, and from the claims.




DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a diagram of a process for determining whether a transcript is classified as a CAT.



FIG. 2 contains photographs of the histopathology of rejecting mouse allografts using PAS staining (magnification 40×). Panel A: isograft (CBA into CBA) at day 5 with normal histology. Panel B: rejecting kidney allograft (CBA into B6) at day 5 with periarterial mononuclear interstitial infiltration. Panel C: rejecting kidney allograft at D7 (CBA into B6) with mononuclear interstitial infiltration and mild tubulitis. Panel D: kidney transplant (CBA into B6) at day 21 with heavy tubulitis.



FIG. 3 is a graph plotting the reproducibility of gene expression analysis. Gene expression values (n=22,690) from two biological replicates of pools of three kidneys rejecting in wild-type hosts at D5 (WTD5) demonstrate good reproducibility of microarray data (r=0.92).



FIG. 4 contains graphs plotting the correlation of gene expression analysis for 12 selected genes using microarrays versus real-time RT-PCR. The time course of gene expression in kidneys rejecting at day 5, 7, and 21 post transplant in selected genes (fold change versus normal kidney (NCBA)) for RT-PCR data (left) and microarrays (right).



FIG. 5 is a diagram of unsupervised hierarchical clustering of experimental groups. Unsupervised clustering of all genes, based on distance, demonstrates three main groups with a good separation between (1) isografts (ISO), (2) allografts rejecting in wild-type hosts (WT) or B cell deficient hosts (IghKO), and (3) lymphocyte cultures (MLR=mixed lymphocyte culture; CTL=CTL clone).



FIG. 6 is a graph plotting the expression level of CATs in isografts and WT allografts. CATs were absent in normal kidney, low in isografts, but highly expressed in rejecting kidneys at day 5. The expression of this set of CATs persisted throughout the rejection process.



FIG. 7 is a bar graph plotting the expression of CATs for K-means clusters in d4MLR and WT allografts. Based on their expression in a CTL clone, CATs (n=287) cluster in 5 groups. Expression in MLR and WT allografts in clusters 1-5 is shown as the percent of expression in the CTL clone. The boxplots represent the median and quartiles of expression of CATs for each time point. The CATs of cluster 1 (n=140) had low expression in MLR, but stable expression in all allografts. The CATs of cluster 2 (n=23) were more highly expressed in MLR than CTL and exhibited relatively strongly increased expression in day 5 rejecting kidneys, further increasing expression at D14. The CATs of cluster 3 (n=74) had relatively high expression in MLR versus CTL but lower expression in rejecting kidney, fluctuating somewhat among the different times while increasing between D5 and D7. The CATs of cluster 4 (n=46) had less expression in MLR than CTL, increased expression between D5 and D14, and decreased expression thereafter. The CATs of cluster 5 (n=4) were as highly expressed in rejecting grafts as in the CTL clone and MLR.



FIG. 8 is a bar graph plotting the expression of CATs for K-means clusters in kidneys rejecting in wild-type hosts and B cell deficient hosts at D7 and D21. Cluster analysis of CATs was based on expression in WT allografts (FIG. 7). Expression for each cluster is shown for WT and IghKO D7 and D21 as the percent of expression in the CTL clone. The boxplots represent the median and quartiles of expression of CATs for each time point. Expression of CATs was slightly higher in IghKO compared to WT at D7 but exhibited some attenuation in IghKO compared to their wild-type counterparts at D21.




DETAILED DESCRIPTION

This description provides methods and materials involved in detecting tissue rejection (e.g., organ rejection). For example, this description provides methods and materials that can be used to diagnose a mammal (e.g., a human) as having transplanted tissue that is being rejected. A mammal can be diagnosed as having transplanted tissue that is being rejected if it is determined that the tissue contains cells that express one or more CATs or that express one or more of the nucleic acids listed in Table 4 or Table 5.


The methods and materials provided herein can be used to detect tissue rejection in any mammal such as a human, monkey, horse, dog, cat, cow, pig, mouse, or rat. In addition, the methods and materials provided herein can be used to detect rejection of any type of transplanted tissue including, without limitation, kidney, heart, liver, pancreas, and lung tissue. For example, the methods and materials provided herein can be used to determine whether or not a human who received a kidney transplant is rejecting that transplanted kidney.


Any type of sample containing cells can be used to determine whether or not transplanted tissue contains cells that express one or more CATs or that express one or more of the nucleic acids listed in Table 4 or Table 5. For example, biopsy (e.g., punch biopsy, aspiration biopsy, excision biopsy, needle biopsy, or shave biopsy), tissue section, lymph fluid, blood, and synovial fluid samples can be used. In some embodiments, a tissue biopsy sample can be obtained directly from the transplanted tissue. In some embodiments, a lymph fluid sample can be obtained from one or more lymph vessels that drain from the transplanted tissue. A sample can contain any type of cell including, without limitation, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, CD4+ T cells, B cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, macrophages, kidney cells, lymph node cells, or endothelial cells.


As explained herein, a CAT refers to a transcript that is expressed by activated CTL in culture at a level greater than the level of expression in normal kidney tissue. Examples of CATs include, without limitation, the nucleic acids listed in Table 4 and/or Table 5. Additional examples of CATs can be identified using the procedures described herein. For example, the procedures described in Example 1 and Example 3 can be used to identify CATs other than those listed in Tables 4 and 5.


Any suitable process can be used to determine whether a particular transcript is classified as a CAT. In some embodiments, for example, a process can include determining whether a transcript is expressed in CTL and/or MLR at a level that is at least three (e.g., at least four, at least five, at least six, or at least seven) times higher than the level at which the transcript is expressed in normal kidney cells. FIG. 1 is a diagram of another embodiment of a process for determining whether a particular transcript is classified as a CAT. With reference to FIG. 1, process 100 can include step 102 for determining whether the transcript has a signal less than 50 in normal kidney (e.g., in kidney tissue from mouse strains such as CBA, B6, and Balbc), step 104 for determining whether expression of the transcript is at least five times higher in CTL as compared to expression in normal kidney, determining whether expression is at least five times higher in CD8 cells as compared to expression in normal kidney, and determining whether expression is at least five times higher in MLR and is significantly higher (p (fdr)<0.01, where “fdr” is the false discovery rate) as compared to expression in normal kidney, and step 106 for determining whether the transcript is expressed at a level that is at least two times increased in wild type allografts (CBA into B6) at day 5 and is significant (p (fdr)<0.01) as compared to expression in normal kidney. If the answer to each of these steps is “yes,” then the transcript can be classified as a CAT. If the answer to any of the steps is “no,” then the transcript is classified as not a CAT. The steps depicted in FIG. 1 can be carried out in any suitable order. Further, the steps depicted in FIG. 1 can be further divided into separate steps (e.g., step 104 can be separated into four steps, for determining (a) whether expression of the transcript is at least five times higher in CTL as compared to normal kidney, (b) whether expression is at least five times higher in CD8 cells as compared to normal kidney, (c) whether expression is at least five times higher in MLR as compared to normal kidney, and (d) whether expression in MLR is significantly higher (p (fdr)<0.01) than expression in normal kidney. Similarly, step 106 can be divided into two separate steps.


The expression of any number of CATs or nucleic acids listed in Table 4 or Table 5 can be evaluated to determine whether or not transplanted tissue is being or is likely to be rejected. For example, the expression of one or more than one (e.g., two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 75, 100, or more than 100) of the nucleic acids listed in Table 4 or Table 5 can be used. In some embodiments, determining that a nucleic acid listed in Table 4 or Table 5 is expressed in a sample at a detectable level can indicate that the transplanted tissue will be rejected. In some embodiments, transplanted tissue can be evaluated by determining whether or not the tissue contains cells that express a nucleic acid listed in Table 4 or Table 5 at a level that is greater than the average expression level observed in control cells obtained from tissue that has not been transplanted. Typically, a nucleic acid can be classified as being expressed at a level that is greater than the average level observed in control cells if the expression levels differ by at least 1-fold (e.g., 1.5-fold, 2-fold, 3-fold, or more than 3-fold). Control cells typically are the same type of cells as those being evaluated. In some cases, the control cells can be isolated from kidney tissue that has not been transplanted into a mammal. Any number of tissues can be used to obtain control cells. For example, control cells can be obtained from one or more tissue samples (e.g., at least 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more tissue samples) obtained from one or more healthy mammals (e.g., at least 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more healthy mammals).


Any suitable process can be used to determine whether a transplanted tissue is being or is likely to be rejected. In some embodiments, for example, a process can include determining whether a pre-determined number (e.g., one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 75, 100, or more than 100) of the nucleic acids listed in Table 4 or Table 5 is expressed in a sample (e.g., a sample of transplanted tissue) at a detectable level. If the number of nucleic acids that are expressed in the sample is equal to or exceeds the pre-determined number, the transplanted tissue can be predicted to be rejected. If the number of nucleic acids that are expressed in the sample is less than the pre-determined number, the transplanted tissue can be predicted to not be rejected. The steps of this process (e.g., the detection, or non-detection, of each of the nucleic acids listed in Table 4 or Table 5) can be carried out in any suitable order. In some embodiments, a process can include determining whether a predetermined number of the nucleic acids listed in Table 4 or Table 5 is expressed in a sample at a level that is greater than the average level observed in control cells (e.g., cells obtained from tissue that has not been transplanted. If the number of nucleic acids having increased levels of expression in the sample is equal to or exceeds the pre-determined number, the transplanted tissue can be predicted to be rejected. If the number of nucleic acids having increased expression levels in the sample is less than the pre-determined number, the transplanted tissue can be predicted to not be rejected. Again, the steps of this process can be carried out in any suitable order.


Any suitable method can be used to determine whether or not a particular nucleic acid is expressed at a detectable level or at a level that is greater than the average level of expression observed in control cells. For example, expression of a particular nucleic acid can be measured by assessing mRNA expression. mRNA expression can be evaluated using, for example, northern blotting, slot blotting, quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), real-time RT-PCR, or chip hybridization techniques. Methods for chip hybridization assays include, without limitation, those described herein. Such methods can be used to determine simultaneously the relative expression levels of multiple mRNAs. Alternatively, expression of a particular nucleic acid can be measured by assessing polypeptide levels. For example, polypeptide levels can be measured using any method such as immuno-based assays (e.g., ELISA), western blotting, or silver staining.


The methods and materials provided herein can be used at any time following a tissue transplantation to determine whether or not the transplanted tissue is being or is likely to be rejected. For example, a sample obtained from transplanted tissue at any time following the tissue transplantation can be assessed for the presence of cells expressing a nucleic acid listed in Table 4. In some cases, a sample can be obtained from transplanted tissue 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or more hours after the transplanted tissue was transplanted. In some cases, a sample can be obtained from transplanted tissue one or more days (e.g., 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, or more days) after the transplanted tissue was transplanted. Typically, a sample can be obtained from transplanted tissue 2 to 7 days (e.g., 5 to 7 days) after transplantation and assessed for the presence of cells expressing one or more CATs or expressing one or more nucleic acids listed in Table 4.


This description also provides nucleic acid arrays. The arrays provided herein can be two-dimensional arrays, and can contain at least 10 different nucleic acid molecules (e.g., at least 20, at least 30, at least 50, at least 100, or at least 200 different nucleic acid molecules). Each nucleic acid molecule can have any length. For example, each nucleic acid molecule can be between 10 and 250 nucleotides (e.g., between 12 and 200, 14 and 175, 15 and 150, 16 and 125, 18 and 100, 20 and 75, or 25 and 50 nucleotides) in length. In addition, each nucleic acid molecule can have any sequence. For example, the nucleic acid molecules of the arrays provided herein can contain sequences that are present within the nucleic acids listed in Table 4. For the purpose of this document, a sequence is considered present within a nucleic acid listed in Table 4 when the sequence is present within either the coding or non-coding strand. For example, both sense and anti-sense oligonucleotides designed to human CD2 nucleic acid are considered present within CD2 nucleic acid.


Typically, at least 25% (e.g., at least 30%, at least 40%, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 90%, at least 95%, or 100%) of the nucleic acid molecules of an array provided herein contain a sequence that is (1) at least 10 nucleotides (e.g., at least 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, or more nucleotides) in length and (2) at least about 95 percent (e.g., at least about 96, 97, 98, 99, or 100) percent identical, over that length, to a sequence present within a nucleic acid listed in Table 4.


For example, an array can contain 100 nucleic acid molecules located in known positions, where each of the 100 nucleic acid molecules is 100 nucleotides in length while containing a sequence that is (1) 30 nucleotides in length, and (2) 100 percent identical, over that 30 nucleotide length, to a sequence of one of the nucleic acids listed in Table 4.


A nucleic acid molecule of an array provided herein can contain a sequence present within a nucleic acid listed in Table 4, where that sequence contains one or more (e.g., one, two, three, four, or more) mismatches. Similarly, an array can contain 100 nucleic acid molecules located in known positions, where each of the 100 nucleic acid molecules is 100 nucleotides in length while containing a sequence that is (1) 30 nucleotides in length, and (2) 100 percent identical, over that 30 nucleotide length, to a sequence of one of the nucleic acids listed in Table 5. A nucleic acid molecule of an array provided herein can contain a sequence present within a nucleic acid listed in Table 5, where that sequence contains one or more (e.g., one, two, three, four, or more) mismatches.


The nucleic acid arrays provided herein can contain nucleic acid molecules attached to any suitable surface (e.g., plastic or glass). In addition, any method can be use to make a nucleic acid array. For example, spotting techniques and in situ synthesis techniques can be used to make nucleic acid arrays. Further, the methods disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,744,305 and 5,143,854 can be used to make nucleic acid arrays.


Computer-Readable Medium and an Apparatus for Predicting Rejection


This disclosure further provides a computer-readable storage medium configured with instructions for causing a programmable processor to determine whether a transplanted tissue is being or is likely to be rejected. The determination of whether a transplanted tissue is being or will be rejected can be carried out as described herein; that is, by determining whether one or more of the nucleic acids listed in Table 4 or Table 5 is detected in a sample (e.g., a sample of the tissue), or is expressed at a level that is greater than the level of expression in a corresponding tissue that is not transplanted. The processor also can be designed to perform functions such as removing baseline noise from detection signals.


Instructions carried on a computer-readable storage medium (e.g., for detecting signals) can be implemented in a high level procedural or object oriented programming language to communicate with a computer system. Alternatively, such instructions can be implemented in assembly or machine language. The language further can be compiled or interpreted language.


The nucleic acid detection signals can be obtained using an apparatus (e.g., a chip reader) and a determination of tissue rejection can be generated using a separate processor (e.g., a computer). Alternatively, a single apparatus having a programmable processor can both obtain the detection signals and process the signals to generate a determination of whether rejection is occurring or is likely to occur. In addition, the processing step can be performed simultaneously with the step of collecting the detection signals (e.g., “real-time”).


Also provided herein, therefore, is an apparatus for determining whether a transplanted tissue is being or is likely to be rejected. An apparatus for determining whether tissue rejection will occur can include one or more collectors for obtaining signals from a sample (e.g., a sample of nucleic acids hybridized to nucleic acid probes on a substrate such as a chip) and a processor for analyzing the signals and determining whether rejection will occur. By way of example, the collectors can include collection optics for collecting signals (e.g., fluorescence) emitted from the surface of the substrate, separation optics for separating the signal from background focusing the signal, and a recorder responsive to the signal, for recording the amount of signal. The collector can obtain signals representative of the presence of one or more nucleic acids listed in Table 4 or Table 5 (e.g., in samples from transplanted and/or non-transplanted tissue). The apparatus further can generate a visual or graphical display of the signals, such as a digitized representation. The apparatus further can include a display. In some embodiments, the apparatus can be portable.


The invention will be further described in the following examples, which do not limit the scope of the invention described in the claims.


EXAMPLES
Example 1
Early Diagnosis of Organ Rejection

Kidney rejection is mediated by infiltration of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) and diagnosed by histologic Banff lesions such as tubulitis. Using Affymetrix microarrays, the relationship between the evolution of pathologic lesions and the transcriptome in normal mouse kidneys, CBA isografts, CBA into C57B1/6 allografts at days 5 to 42, and kidneys rejecting in B cell deficient hosts was evaluated. Histology was dominated by early infiltrate of mononuclear cells and slower evolution of severe tubulitis. A set of CATs was identified as having high expression in a CTL clone and day 4 mixed lymphocyte culture, while being absent in normal kidney. This set of CATs was fully expressed in rejecting kidneys at day 5, representing about 14 to 20 percent of the transcriptome of rejecting kidney. The expression persisted through day 42. Lack of mature B cells had little effect on expression of the set of CATs. In addition, expression of the identified set of CATs was established before diagnostic Banff lesions were observed and remained consistent through day 42 despite massive alterations in the pathology. Thus, the expression of the identified set of CATs in rejecting organs indicates the state of effector T cell infiltration, and can establish the diagnosis of T cell mediated rejection earlier and more securely than pathologic criteria.


Materials and Methods


Mice


Male CBA/J (CBA), C57B1/6 (B6), B6.129P2-Igh-JtmlCgn (Igh-j), and B6.129S2-Igh-6tm1,Cgn (Igh-6) mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Me.) and maintained in the Health Sciences Laboratory Animal Services at the University of Alberta. All maintenance and experiments conformed to approved animal care protocols. CBA (H-2K, I-Ak) into C57B1/6 (B6; H-2KbDb, I-Ab) mice strain combinations were studied across full MHC and non-MHC disparities. To ensure robust findings, two different types of IghKO mice, which were previously shown to have similar phenotypes as hosts for allografts (Jabs et al., Am. J. Transplant, 3(12):1501-1509 (2003)), were used.


Renal Transplantation


Donor mice of 9-11 weeks of age were anaesthetized, and the right kidney was removed through a midline abdominal incision and preserved in cold lactate Ringer's solution. Host mice were similarly anaesthetized, and the right native kidney excised. The donor kidney was anastomosed heterotopically to the aorta, inferior vena cava, and bladder on the right side, without removing the host's left kidney (non life-supporting kidney transplantation). Recovered mice were killed at day 5, 7, 14, 21, or 42 post-transplant, following anaesthesia and cervical dislocation. Kidneys were removed, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −70° C. No mice received immunosuppressive therapy. Kidneys with technical complications or infection at the time of harvesting were removed from the study.


Mixed Leukocyte Reaction (MLR)


CTL effectors were generated by co-culturing C57BL/61 responder splenocytes with mitomycin C-treated (5 μg/mL, Sigma Chemicals, St. Louis, Mo.) CBA splenocytes in complete RPMI 1640 medium (10% FCS, 1% antibiotic-antimycotic; Life Technologies, Grand Island, N.Y.), 1% nonessential amino acids, 1% sodium pyruvate (Flow Laboratories, McLean, Va.), and 50 μM β-ME at a concentration of 3×106 cells/mL. Cultures were kept at 37° C., 5% CO2 in 25 cm2 cell culture flasks standing upright for 4 days. Cytolytic activity was confirmed by a 51Cr release assay.


CTL Culture


A CTL clone, C57/B6 anti C3H, was generated by co-culturing C57B1/6 splenocytes with irradiated (2500 rads) C3H splenocytes at a 1:1 ratio for 3 days in RPMI 1640 medium (same composition as for the 4-day MLR). CTLs were purified using Ficoll gradient and cultured for another 4 days. Re-stimulation was performed at a 1:14 ratio for 3 days. After purification, cells were used for RNA extraction. Cytolytic activity was confirmed by a 51Cr release assay.


RNA Preparation


Total RNA was extracted from individual kidneys by the guanidinium-caesium chloride method (transplants) or by Trizol extraction (4-day MLR and CTL cultures), and RNA yields were measured by UV absorbance. Quality was assessed by the absorbance ratio, by agarose gel electrophoresis, and, in select samples, by Affymetrix T3 Test arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, Calif.). For microarray analysis, equal amounts of RNA from 3 mice (20-25 μg each) were pooled and purified using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Quiagen, Ont. Canada). dsDNA and cRNA synthesis, hybridization to MOE 430A oligonucleotide arrays (Affymetrix), washing, and staining were carried out according to the manufacturer's manual. See, e.g., Affymetrix Technical Manual, 2003 version downloaded from Affymetrix's website.


Real-Time RT-PCR


To confirm the microarray results, expression of selected genes was assessed by TaqMan real-time RT-PCR. Two micrograms of RNA were transcribed using M-MLV reverse transcriptase and random primers. All TaqMan probe/primer combinations were designed using Primer Express software version 1.5 or purchased as Assay on demand (PE Applied Biosystems). cDNA was amplified in a multiplex system using murine hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) cDNA as the control. Quantification of gene expression was performed utilizing the ABI prism 7700 Sequence Detection System (PE Applied Biosystems) as described elsewhere (Heid et al., Genome Research, 6(10):986-994 (1996)). Fold change over control kidney was determined using the ΔCt or ΔΔCt methods as described by the manufacturer.


Sample Designation and Analysis


Normal control kidneys were from CBA mice (NCBA). Allografts rejecting in wild-type hosts (B6) at day 5, 7, 14, 21, and 42 post transplant were designated WT D5, WT D7, WT D14, WT D21, and WT D42, respectively. Corresponding isografts were designated Iso D5, Iso D7, and Iso D21. Allografts rejecting in mature B cell deficient B6 hosts studied at days 7 and 21 were designated IghKO D7 and IghKO D21. Mixed leukocyte reaction, day 4, was designated as d4MLR and CTL clone, day 4, was designated as CTL. Two biological replicates (each consisting of RNA pooled from 3 mice) were tested in the following groups: WT D7, WT D14, WT D21, WT D42, Iso D7, and IghKO D7. Biological triplicates were analyzed in NCBA, WT D5, IghKO D21 (2 arrays with RNA pooled from 3 Igh-6 hosts, and 1 array with RNA pooled from 3 Igh-j hosts), and a single analysis was done in Iso D5, Iso D21, d4MLR, and CTL. Before processing for mRNA studies, every kidney was examined histologically to exclude kidneys with infection or surgical complication (global early infarction).


Initial data analysis was performed using Microarray Suite Expression Analysis 5.0 software (Affymetrix). Software default conditions were used to flag transcripts as present, marginal, or absent and to calculate the absolute signal strength. Total fluorescence for each array was globally scaled to a target value of 500. GeneSpring™ software (Version 6.1, Silicon Genetics, Calif., USA) was used for further analyses. Following data importation, intensity values below 20 were adjusted to a value of 20, a per chip normalization was performed to the 50th percentile, and a per gene normalization was performed using NCBA or CTL as control samples. Replicate samples were expressed as mean normalized value for further analysis. For unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis, similarity measurements were based on distance and visualized by a tree diagram (Eisen et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 95(25):14863-14868 (1998)). CATs were defined as CTL associated transcripts having a signal that was increased at least five-fold in CTL and MLR culture compared to the signal in normal kidney (significant by ANOVA; p<0.05), and that were “absent” (by Affymetrix GCOS software default conditions) in normal CBA kidney.


A second, more refined algorithm, used RMA (robust multichip analysis). In this process, CATs were identified based on (1) a signal less than 50 in normal kidneys in all three strains (CBA, B6, and Balb/c), (2) a signal at least 5 times higher in CTL, MLR, and CD8 as compared to normal kidneys, significantly higher (p(fdr)<0.01) in MLR vs. normal kidney, and at least 2 times higher in wild type allografts (CBA into B6) at day 5 and significant (p(fdr)<0.01) compared to normal kidney.


CATs were analyzed using a K-means cluster algorithm based on expression data normalized to the CTL clone.


Results


Pathological Lesions in Rejecting Kidneys


Histology of CBA kidney allografts in B6 hosts has been described elsewhere (Jabs et al., Am. J. Transplant., 3(12):1501-1509 (2003) and Halloran et al., Am. J. Transplant., 4(5):705-712 (2004)). Isografts at 5 (FIG. 2, panel A), 7, and 21 days post transplant appeared normal with no inflammation or acute tubular necrosis. Allografts exhibited an interstitial mononuclear infiltrate at day 5, which increased at day 7, and stabilized or regressed by day 21 (FIG. 2, panels B, C, and D, respectively). Tubulitis was absent at day 5, mild at day 7, and severe at days 14, 21, and 42. By immunostaining, the infiltrate in kidney allografts at days 5, 7, and 21 was comprised of 40-60 percent CD3+ T cells (mostly CD8+) and 35-50 percent CD68+ macrophages, with late appearance of about 5 percent CD 19+B cells at day 21. Hosts deficient in mature B cells (Igh6KO or IghJKO) exhibited similar infiltrate and tubulitis but less necrosis and hemorrhage at day 21 (Jabs et al., Am. J. Transplant., 3(12):1501-1509 (2003)), and 19 percent lower kidney weight (260±58 mg, n=8 versus 319±70 mg, n=6 in wild type hosts). Details of the histology of individual mice are found in Table 1 with the abbreviations being as follows: wt: weight; Tx: transplant; Nec: necrosis; PTC: peritubular capillary congestion; Glom: glomerulitis; Tub: tubulitis; Inf: interstitial infiltrate; Art: arteritis; AT: arterial thrombosis; Ven: venulitis; VT: venous thrombosis; NCBA: normal CBA kidney; iso: isograft; WT: wild-type allograft.

TABLE 1Histology for individual mice.MouseDonorHostTxDonorHostdayIDwtwtwtNecPTCGlomTubInfArtATVenVTEdCastNCBACBA06952417062762869625165661662752282097552013375620132IsoCBACBA572734282490010000200072827262260000000100074029282420000000000075202523207001050000005252527298001000000005282425229010100101000751272619305100000000744282423100100002000745252719200100000000215132727193001000010005183425182010105101000531262720400100000000WTCBAB65495302625300110300000004962926303001104000400049933232790001020004000510202821505110100010005112326309001205030100069425201681502405000100083124299001102000400087430242700011520002000744731423002204000500045526239002204000600047126338002206000800035027290002154000200035128267002103000300035228299002104000000014404242734901035060203010540523273890153504041301554062428228015360503220105403242532101035060114000787262734700130500020008592725358502503000200021470263715035060102000346303635103405000102004563239810036070103020104362729700380503020004382826450370504030101044526219100360601030010422872528500140400021002882922400270750000005662534830028060210080028929627750230300210750291274992040280701120400297293925060280702230700IghKOCBAIgh-671162529400150600000002652233020013070515005274171600014050002000275212320013060304000276192625013060203000277202860013070003000Igh-62115528283001300000000244252230012020001000259242140002020100000156282081010375750050002642521601027575110000Igh-J49021373001530002050491262600012030102000492303060513020302000


Affymetrix Microarray Analysis and Validation


The global gene expression correlated well in biological replicates from two independent pools of three kidneys (NCBA: r=0.96; Iso D7: r=0.96; WT D5: r=0.92; WT D7: r=0.96; WT D14: r=0.98; WT D21: r=0.86; WT D42: r=0.90). The results for WT D5 transplants are presented in FIG. 3. Correlation between the d4MLR and a CTL clone was r=0.82. Microarray results were compared with real-time RT-PCR for a set of 35 genes encoding cytokines, chemokines, CD markers, and other factors involved in inflammation and cytolysis. Results from twelve selected genes are presented in FIG. 4. RT-PCR results revealed a 10 fold higher increase in gene expression when compared to the results obtained from microarrays, but the patterns of gene expression were similar for microarray and RT-PCR (r=0.87).


Hierarchical Clustering of the Global Gene Expression in Rejecting Kidneys, Isografts, CTL, and d4 MLR


Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis was used to compare overall gene expression between control kidneys, isografts, allografts rejecting in WT and IghKO hosts, d4MLR, and the allostimulated CTL clone. The resulting dendrogram (FIG. 5) revealed that the transcriptomes cluster into three groups. One group included normal kidneys and isografts at days 5, 7, and 21, with Iso D21 being more similar to NCBA than Iso D5 or Iso D7. The allografts clustered in a second group, with WT D5, WT D7, IghKO D7, and IghKO D21 in one sub-cluster and WT D 14, WT D21, and WT D42 in a second sub-cluster. d4MLR and CTL formed a distinct third cluster.


CD Antigen Transcript Expression


Expression of CD gene transcripts as a reflection of cellular infiltration was analyzed. Transcripts were selected by searching a master table for “CD antigen.” Genes having an expression level that was increased greater than two fold at least at one time point during rejection in allografts were chosen and compared to other samples.


The expression of thirty-three CD transcripts was increased at least two fold in wild-type allografts as compared to the expression levels observed in NCBA kidney (Table 2). Twenty-one of these had high expression in d4MLR and CTL (increased more than 5 fold as compared to NCBA). High expression of these transcripts in rejecting kidney is consistent with CTL infiltration at D5, which increases at D7 and stabilizes thereafter. CD2f10 and CD14 were increased in rejecting allografts with no expression in d4MLR or CTL, suggesting that they represent infiltrating activated macrophages, which are poorly represented in d4MLR and absent in CTL. The relatively high CD68 expression in all rejecting grafts supports this view. The B cell specific transcripts CD79a and CD79b appeared late in rejection at days 14, 21, and 42 in wild-type but not in IghKO hosts, consistent with late recruitment of antibody-producing cells to the graft. The analysis of CD transcripts is consistent with an early and sustained CTL/macrophage infiltrate in wild-type and IghKO hosts, and with late B cell infiltration in wild-type hosts.

TABLE 2Changes in CD antigen transcripts in isografts and kidneys rejecting in wild-typehosts and in B cell deficient hosts.IghKOAllograftsNCBAIsograftsWT AllograftsFoldLymphocytesSignalFold ChangeFold ChangeChangeFold ChangeSymbolNCBAD5D7D21D5D7D14D21D42D7D21CTLMLRCd1d1485.23.14.12.62.79.45.3Cd21510.413.615.812.79.310.29.9269.5166.0Cd2f10-1124.25.510.87.97.43.94.8pendingCd3d842.159.060.848.931.866.938.2812.4910.7Cd3e609.316.311.216.16.319.913.864.881.1Cd3g4322.935.941.442.423.437.628.0252.4174.9Cd3z396.99.18.18.64.39.56.654.864.5Cd51122.94.12.43.23.82.714.617.1Cd6546.86.67.27.26.918.416.2Cd7249.6Cd8a979.318.817.611.68.827.910.939.732.8Cd8b2226.939.650.340.024.847.129.1251.6111.8Cd144243.67.32.85.44.24.65.53.1Cd221532.43.13.22.614.4Cd28418.68.110.75.26.17.95.176.245.8Cd383433.12.32.93.12.03.2Cd44652.13.79.814.329.628.925.015.616.843.025.6Cd479903.22.94.03.72.93.83.113.39.5Cd48204.023.629.645.831.233.532.122.3269.663.1Cd522872.115.119.130.619.819.721.615.371.058.8Cd531342.811.417.322.618.219.618.013.073.971.7Cd681614.86.713.410.618.39.88.92.52.7Cd72417.813.427.714.920.29.414.413.630.9Cd79a852.02.92.735.6Cd79b673.03.83.935.6Cd80542.03.02.32.46.33.1Cd83813.84.79.312.212.74.19.235.6Cd84712.93.811.610.512.76.98.920.812.3Cd86822.93.48.45.86.83.64.22.75.9Cd972722.12.82.83.63.12.82.914.28.9Ptprc1872.520.121.328.024.316.723.818.988.272.9(CD45)Sdc12473.33.63.83.12.8(CD138)Thy11329.210.67.611.25.712.011.671.991.6(CD90)


The table contains the signal strength for controls and fold changes for the transplants. (−) indicates that a given gene was not upregulated; bolded signal values indicate that a transcript was classified as present. In case of multiple probe sets querying the same gene, data obtained from probe sets with suffixes _s_at and _x_at were not considered, and a probe set displaying the most robust signal was selected.


Eighteen CD transcripts were present in normal kidney, perhaps reflecting immature dendritic cells in the interstitium (Austyn et al., J. Immunol., 152:2401-2410 (1994)). Expression of CD transcripts was similar between CTL and d4MLR. In addition, d4MLR contained the B cell specific transcripts CD79a and CD79b. Macrophage transcript CD14 was not expressed in CTL or d4MLR, while macrophage transcript CD68 was expressed at a low level in both.


Expression of CA Ts in Rejecting Mouse Kidney Allografts


CATs were defined by high expression in both the CTL clone and in d4MLR but rated as “absent” in normal kidney. This algorithm identified 287 CATs. Expression of CATs was lower in d4MLR than in the CTL clone (mean 91±59 percent, median 87 percent). Compared to NCBA and isografts, the CATs were strongly expressed in rejecting WT allografts (FIG. 6). At day 5 post-transplant, the signal for CATs was increased 6.4 fold compared to NCBA and 14 percent (median) of that observed with the CTL clone (mean 20±28 percent). These results indicate that the CTL infiltrating the kidney are diluted about 5-6 fold compared to the CTL clone or the d4MLR. To confirm this interpretation, RNA from d4MLR was diluted with kidney RNA in a ratio 1:4. The resulting signal was similar to the signal in all rejecting kidneys (mean 20±7 percent, median 20 percent of the d4MLR and mean 18±11 percent, median 15 percent of expression in the CTL clone). Thus, at day 5, about one fifth to one sixth of the transcriptome of rejecting kidney is attributable to CATs. After day 5, mean expression of CATs was stable as a percent of the CTL signal (D7, 23.2±28 percent; D14, 27.3±45 percent; D21, 26.2±34 percent; and D42, 22.5±38 percent) and the median was also consistent (D5, 14 percent; D7, 16 percent; D14, 16 percent; D21, 16 percent; and D42, 12 percent).


To determine whether the pattern of CAT expression is consistent in vivo, the consistency of expression of individual CATs in various experimental conditions was analyzed. By non-parametric regression analysis, the expression of CATs correlated in all conditions, indicating robust maintenance of CAT expression in vivo and in vitro (Table 3). The d4MLR correlated well with the diluted MLR (r=0.91), despite the 80 percent decrease in signal, and slightly less well with the CTL clone (r=0.81; p<0.001). In rejecting transplants, the CAT signals exhibited a striking correlation among all days in wild-type hosts (r=0.90-0.96), indicating that most CATs displayed predictable and stable levels of expression in vivo in all rejecting kidneys. The correlations of d4MLR with the rejecting transplants at all days were considerably less (r=0.70-0.78; p<0.001), indicating significant differences between the relative transcript levels in vivo and in vitro. Expression in the CTL clone correlated least with that in the transplants (r=0.66-0.74; p=n.s.). Thus, the relative level of expression of individual CATs was similar in vitro between CTL and d4MLR, and was similar in vivo under all conditions in rejecting transplants, but was somewhat different in vivo compared to in vitro.

TABLE 3Spearman rank correlations for CATs in lymphocytes from d4MLR and a CTL clone(CTL), MLR diluted with kidney RNA 1:4 (MLRdil), and kidneys rejectingin wild-type (WT) and B-cell deficient (IghKO) hosts atdays 5-42 post transplant.IghKOIghKOMLRCTLMLRdilWTD5WTD7WTD14WTD21WTD42D7D21MLR1.81.91.78.79.74.74.70.80.77CTL.811.78.74.74.74.69.37.73.69MLRdil.91.781.84.82.76.75.73.81.79WTD5.78.74.841.96.92.90.90.96.92WTD7.79.74.82.961.95.96.93.98.96WTD14.74.74.76.92.951.96.97.95.96WTD21.76.69.75.90.96.961.94.96.98WTD42.70.66.73.90.93.97.941.93.95IghKO.80.73.81.96.98.95.96.931.97D7IghKO.77.69.79.92.96.96.98.95.971D21


To further investigate expression patterns of individual CATs, a k-means cluster analysis of CATs was performed based on their expression level in wild-type allografts relative to the CTL clone. The 287 CATs were clustered into five clusters (FIG. 7). Cluster 1 has 140 transcripts (e.g., CD2, CD3g, GzmB, Tcrb, EOMES, and several genes related to the cell cycle) and was characterized by lower expression in d4MLR than CTL but relatively stable expression in all allografts (FIG. 7). The expression level for individual CATs are provided in Table 4. The mean expression was 6.1 fold increased versus NCBA at day 5, and remained unchanged thereafter. Cluster 2 has 23 transcripts (Table 4). The cluster 2 CATs were more highly expressed in d4MLR than CTL and relatively strongly increased in day 5 rejecting kidneys (6.7 fold; FIG. 7). A further 2.4 fold increase was observed from day 5 to day 14, and expression levels were stable thereafter. Cluster 3 has 74 transcripts, and the expression was also relatively high in d4MLR versus CTL, but lower in rejecting kidney, fluctuating somewhat among the different times (FIG. 7 and Table 4). Cluster 4 has 46 transcripts, and the CATs of this cluster were less expressed in d4MLR than CTL, exhibited a 2.2 fold increase in expression from day 5 to day 14, and exhibited a decreased expression thereafter by 1.4 fold. Cluster 5 has four transcripts, and the CATs of this cluster were as highly expressed in rejecting grafts as in the CTL clone and d4MLR (FIG. 7 and Table 4). Expression of CATs in cluster 2 and cluster 5 is higher than in clusters 1, 3, and 4, which contained the great majority of the CATs.

TABLE 4CATs of clusters 1 through 5GenBankIghKOAccessionAllograftsGenBankNumber forNCBAWT AllograftsFoldLymphocytesAccessionHumanSignalFold ChangeChangeFold ChangeSymbolGene TitleNumberOrthologNCBAD5D7D14D21D42D7D21CTLMLRD4CLUSTER 1Adam19a disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain 19 (meltrin beta)D50410NM_023038348.38.97.811.16.710.16.929.818.9NM_033274Adam19a disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain 19 (meltrin beta)NM_009616NM_023038123.55.14.55.23.65.43.215.211.4NM_033274Ask-activator of S phase kinaseNM_013726NM_006716723.63.53.83.22.83.42.122.318.5pendingAqp9aquaporin 9BC024105NM_020980172.51.22.72.72.91.12.520.914.5Abcb9ATP-binding cassette,AK020749NM_01962481.61.31.11.00.81.71.819.616.0sub-family BBC017348NM_019625(MDR/TAP), member 9NM_203444NM_203445BC017348Brdg1-BCR downstreamNM_019992NM_0121081301.51.62.21.51.61.61.410.58.6pendingsignaling 1BC014958Brca1breast cancer 1U31625AF005068251.61.01.60.71.71.00.613.18.5NM_007295Bub1budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 homolog (S. cerevisiae)AF002823AF04329495.75.66.94.84.87.04.177.755.9AK023540Bub1bbudding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 homolog, beta (S. cerevisiae)NM_009773NM_0012111911.08.98.86.95.913.78.180.265.2Calmbp1calmodulin bindingBB648052AK001380242.21.72.81.62.12.51.416.510.1protein 1MGC38321CasL interacting moleculeBB209438NM_022765105.36.56.78.45.76.48.162.644.4MICALCtswcathepsin WNM_009985NM_0013351732.241.547.143.423.354.945.1476.9257.3Cd2CD2 antigenNM_013486NM_0017671510.413.615.812.79.310.29.9269.5166.0Siva-Cd27 binding proteinNM_013929AF033111142.11.23.63.23.54.53.333.735.1pending(Hindu God ofNM_006427destruction)AW024335Cd3gCD3 antigen, gammaM58149NM_0000734322.935.941.442.423.437.628.0252.4174.9polypeptideCd53CD53 antigenNM_007651NM_00056013411.417.322.618.219.618.013.073.971.7BC003314cDNA sequenceNM_030255NM_004900868.69.88.69.57.912.58.544.435.1BC003314NM_145298NM_021822Cdc6cell division cycle 6NM_011799NM_001254115.63.05.23.53.24.72.444.019.0homolog (S. cerevisiae)U77949Cenpacentromere autoantigen AAV132173NM_0018092210.510.410.08.36.010.26.0180.3166.7Chl12-Chl12 homolog (yeast)BM233289AK02447650.90.80.80.80.80.90.912.410.5pendingHcapg-chromosome condensationAV277326NM_02234654.43.04.72.73.83.51.673.122.0pendingprotein GCoro1acoronin, actin bindingBB740218NM_00707492.63.63.22.62.22.52.730.823.9protein 1ACcna2cyclin A2NM_009828NM_0012372142.62.41.91.81.72.21.817.29.0Ccnb1cyclin B1AU015121NM_0319661512.411.012.17.24.18.56.0109.351.0Ccnb2cyclin B2AK013312NM_004701696.35.25.63.94.14.63.678.236.0BF509102AK023404AU134430Ccnd2cyclin D2BM118679NM_00175941.01.71.41.51.81.52.07.15.5Ccnd2cyclin D2BB840359NM_00175992.01.43.01.22.61.11.28.17.1Ccne1cyclin E1NM_007633NM_001238781.61.41.41.31.11.81.46.75.4NM_057182Cst7cystatin F (leukocystatin)NM_009977AF0318241515.323.528.725.922.431.923.0223.5199.5Diap3diaphanous homolog 3NM_019670NM_03093261.72.02.71.12.32.11.020.89.8(Drosophila)AL354829Dnmt1DNA methyltransferaseBB165431NM_0013791632.93.12.72.52.42.82.514.310.1(cytosine-5) 1D2Ertd750eDNA segment, Chr 2,AK012148NM_033286282.22.42.31.40.82.21.133.915.1ERATO Doi 750,expressedEmbembiginBG064842NM_1984494281.81.91.91.91.72.71.614.910.7Eomeseomesodermin homolog (Xenopus laevis)AB031037NM_00544291.13.20.85.20.81.72.482.424.3ESTs, Moderately similar to hypothetical protein FLJ23311 [Homo sapiens]BM247465NM_024680233.65.83.33.23.64.12.520.618.0[H. sapiens]Eef1b2eukaryotic translationC77437NM_0010083961242.01.81.71.61.41.61.27.45.6elongation factor 1 beta 2NCBINM_007086AA408511expressed sequenceAU018569AB04095723.83.43.72.31.73.21.445.816.3AA408511NM_020890AA675320expressed sequenceBC025223NM_1445951001.41.51.91.41.21.61.48.56.9AA675320AI173001expressed sequenceBC024727NM_0148001492.22.72.22.52.02.12.09.08.1AI173001NM_130442Fignl1fidgetin-like 1NM_021891NM_022116109.69.88.47.43.810.65.477.453.0AK023411Gtse1G two S phase expressedNM_013882NM_016426202.02.53.61.51.91.81.726.822.8protein 1BC006325BF973178AI218393AI340239Glipr2GLI pathogenesis-related 2BM208214NM_022343693.84.05.06.84.05.86.121.718.2Gzmbgranzyme BNM_013542J031894338.644.858.823.024.265.130.3703.2476.8HemgnhemogenNM_053149AF13006051.32.40.80.80.91.01.522.37.2AF322875Hmmrhyaluronan mediatedAF079222U29343791.61.31.50.61.41.30.98.74.9motility receptorNM_012485(RHAMM)BC035392BC002966BM449961MGC37568hypothetical proteinBB327418BC0061072220.022.526.224.623.325.124.4136.5107.9MGC37568Icosinducible T-cell co-AB023132AB0231351210.614.812.69.27.417.512.671.157.7stimulatorIncenpinner centromere proteinBQ175667NM_020238604.24.43.34.03.04.63.018.714.6Incenpinner centromere proteinBB418702NM_020238855.15.35.05.54.05.13.559.019.6Il2rainterleukin 2 receptor,AF054581K03122242.32.12.21.31.31.92.064.234.9alpha chainNM_000417Il2rbinterleukin 2 receptor, betaNM_008368NM_0008782423.830.932.939.526.232.430.2168.8119.7chainIl7rinterleukin 7 receptorAI573431NM_00218552.73.97.27.97.05.55.5106.084.8BE217880Kif10kinesin family member 10BG068387NM_001813141.82.11.91.52.01.00.911.66.0Kif11kinesin family member 11BM234447NM_004523463.83.02.92.22.22.61.739.113.4Kif11kinesin family member 11BB827235NM_004523602.41.92.31.21.51.80.925.47.0Kif22-pskinesin family member 22,BC003427NM_00731773.62.43.22.51.94.21.237.215.6pseudogeneKif22-pskinesin family member 22,BC003427NM_007317144.03.65.42.73.94.12.565.224.7pseudogeneKif23kinesin family member 23BG082989NM_00485631.41.01.30.81.60.90.916.510.4NM_138555Kif23kinesin family member 23AW986176NM_004856803.12.42.62.22.32.12.018.410.5NM_138555Lmnb1lamin B1BG064054NM_005573703.73.63.32.92.63.52.223.48.2Lek1leucine, glutamic acid,BB049243NM_0163431521.11.51.41.30.71.51.211.57.4lysine family 1 proteinMelkmaternal embryonicNM_010790NM_01479163.63.73.53.52.03.72.252.519.3leucine zipper kinaseMs4a4bmembrane-spanning 4-BB199001n/a671.497.689.277.453.687.054.71238.4519.1domains, subfamily A,member 4BMcmd6mini chromosomeNM_008567NM_0059152853.13.23.42.92.33.42.518.713.2maintenance deficient 6(S. cerevisiae)Mus musculus adult maleBB014626n/a1012.921.224.329.412.317.616.9158.1102.9testis cDNA, RIKEN full-length enriched library,clone: 4930483L24product: weakly similar toAT-HOOK PROTEINAKNA [Homo sapiens],full insert sequence.Mus musculus, Similar toBC026773AL832450262.74.13.24.92.54.33.329.414.1expressed sequenceAI481279, cloneMGC: 25733IMAGE: 3982549, mRNA,complete cdsMybmyeloblastosis oncogeneBC011513NM_00537562.41.71.41.11.52.00.910.27.8Mybmyeloblastosis oncogeneNM_033597NM_005375104.52.51.32.11.63.11.426.220.1Ncf4neutrophil cytosolic factor 4NM_008677NM_0006311225.66.17.86.26.97.06.017.314.7NM_013416Np95nuclear protein 95NM_010931NM_013282408.07.96.66.94.68.14.755.727.6Np95nuclear protein 95BB702754NM_013282105.76.33.84.72.44.82.044.429.6Odf2outer dense fiber of spermAF000968AF053970152.01.63.22.10.82.11.410.79.1tails 2AL138382Pvt1plasmacytoma variantBE956863n/a310.60.40.50.62.00.80.88.99.1translocation 1Plkpolo-like kinase homolog,NM_011121NM_0050301022.92.82.51.92.02.51.819.714.7(Drosophila)Polepolymerase (DNANM_011132NM_00623172.84.54.22.61.24.13.653.436.5directed), epsilonKcnn4potassiumNM_008433NM_00225048.48.814.012.014.28.98.949.553.7intermediate/smallconductance calcium-activated channel,subfamily N, member 4Kcnn4potassiumBG865910NM_0022501819.819.732.426.331.523.825.4123.497.3intermediate/smallconductance calcium-activated channel,subfamily N, member 4Pstpip1proline-serine-threonineU87814AF038602445.97.18.88.87.49.19.151.140.7phosphatase-interactingprotein 1Prss19protease, serine, 19NM_008940NM_0071961591.41.61.61.62.11.71.411.18.2(neuropsin)NM_144505NM_144506NM_144507Prkcqprotein kinase C, thetaAB062122L010871035.34.13.04.11.74.54.025.515.8AK024876AK024876AL137145LOC233406protein regulator ofBC005475NM_003981973.74.35.33.33.24.33.521.518.4cytokinesis 1-likeNM_199413NM_199414Ptpn8protein tyrosineNM_008979NM_0159671634.44.66.05.24.35.64.243.924.6phosphatase, non-receptorNM_012411type 8AW665758Pycspyrroline-5-carboxylateNM_019698NM_002860873.32.73.93.54.03.33.18.08.7synthetase (glutamateU76542gamma-semialdehydesynthetase)Pycspyrroline-5-carboxylateBB833010NM_002860134.45.68.14.47.23.34.915.014.5synthetase (glutamategamma-semialdehydesynthetase)Racgap1Rac GTPase-activatingNM_012025AU153848135.56.25.26.63.16.14.077.126.8protein 1Racgap1Rac GTPase-activatingAF212320AU1538481642.12.22.11.71.52.31.821.27.9protein 1Rad51ap1RAD51 associated protein 1NM_009013NM_00647931.01.11.10.81.61.10.910.66.3Rad51RAD51 homolog (S. cerevisiae)NM_011234D14134814.612.812.39.78.812.47.596.851.6NM_002875Rad541RAD54 like (S. cerevisiae)AV310220NM_003579453.64.04.03.33.24.22.917.813.9Rassf5Ras associationNM_018750AY062002934.04.85.85.94.55.24.039.220.4(RalGDS/AF-6) domainBC004270family 5Rgs1regulator of G-proteinNM_015811S59049286.98.011.911.29.68.49.182.173.1signaling 1NM_002922Rrm2ribonucleotide reductaseBF119714NM_0010341644.53.64.03.02.83.92.822.513.2M21700054N08RikRIKEN cDNABC024705n/a152.51.23.62.80.84.63.014.010.41700054N08 gene2310009O17RikRIKEN cDNABB799833NM_017447284.03.77.13.35.33.83.155.630.42310009O17 gene2310009O17RikRIKEN cDNABC019957NM_0174472141.61.82.32.31.81.92.08.36.22310009O17 gene2310035M22RikRIKEN cDNANM_025863NM_173084335.15.37.16.05.45.22.846.828.32310035M22 gene2410003C07RikRIKEN cDNAAK010351n/a1610.910.111.26.75.39.66.191.640.62410003C07 gene2410005L11RikRIKEN cDNABC022648NM_031423173.22.62.02.52.12.42.125.316.72410005L11 geneNM_1456972600001J17RikRIKEN cDNABC006674n/a188.86.48.34.14.27.24.237.222.82600001J17 gene2610020P18RikRIKEN cDNANM_023294NM_006101471.91.82.31.71.82.01.319.26.92610020P18 gene2610036L13RikRIKEN cDNANM_026410NM_0806681033.72.93.52.32.43.52.534.914.52610036L13 gene2610201A12RikRIKEN cDNANM_133851NM_0163591033.43.33.32.52.33.42.351.026.52610201A12 geneNM_018454NM_0021572610307O08RikRIKEN cDNAAK012006NM_1982821836.86.46.06.47.36.25.96.86.82610307O08 gene2610510J17RikRIKEN cDNABM230253NM_018455523.53.23.52.62.53.32.714.09.52610510J17 gene2810038K19RikRIKEN cDNANM_023684NM_0178061982.02.11.92.01.21.91.722.58.42810038K19 gene3300001M08RikRIKEN cDNANM_028232NM_001012409164.62.94.33.71.25.01.453.029.73300001M08 geneNM_138484NM_0010124135730403J10RikRIKEN cDNABC004617n/a2281.81.51.91.21.61.51.311.25.05730403J10 geneA430107P09RikRIKEN cDNAX01134n/a4486.28.58.38.04.39.96.145.430.0A430107P09 geneE430034C16RikRIKEN cDNANM_134163NM_018388223.23.63.02.51.63.22.444.910.9E430034C16 geneNM_133486Slfn1schlafen 1NM_011407n/a1520.429.023.218.715.134.019.589.862.16-Sepseptin 6NM_019942D50918273.04.13.52.82.73.82.030.923.2D50918AF403061AK026589T91323AW150913AI968130AL568374Stk12serine/threonine kinase 12BC003261AB011446185.45.25.33.64.14.02.948.318.8Stk18serine/threonine kinase 18BB706079NM_014264351.81.62.31.51.21.61.011.46.2Stk4serine/threonine kinase 4NM_021420Z25430124.73.36.43.34.42.73.220.713.6NM_006282BC039023BC005231BE222274BF433725AI763206Stk6serine/threonine kinase 6U80932NM_0036001152.22.32.21.61.82.01.514.010.0Sh2d1aSH2 domain protein 1ANM_011364AF07293022.63.94.14.41.62.92.0119.964.7AF100540AF100539AF100542Sh2d2aSH2 domain protein 2ANM_021309NM_0039752214.420.018.921.110.121.914.0109.968.7Sh3kbp1SH3-domain kinaseAK007283AF230904395.68.510.77.99.48.95.868.656.9binding protein 1AF542051Sh3kbp1SH3-domain kinaseAK018032AF230904703.13.95.83.64.44.22.526.216.7binding protein 1AF542051Slc28a2solute carrier family 28NM_172980NM_004212810.415.821.316.016.017.911.764.356.1(sodium-couplednucleoside transporter),member 2Satb1special AT-rich sequenceAV172776NM_002971283.22.83.33.01.94.22.9111.185.1binding protein 1Satb1special AT-rich sequenceBG092481NM_002971260.80.70.70.90.60.80.830.517.7binding protein 1Tcrb-V13T-cell receptor beta,M16120n/a17312.715.219.113.08.815.69.4122.888.3variable 13Tcrb-V13T-cell receptor beta,U07661n/a9420.724.022.819.313.521.315.6142.097.1variable 13Tcrb-V13T-cell receptor beta,U46841n/a672.12.32.71.71.82.01.544.512.3variable 13Tcrb-V13T-cell receptor beta,X14388n/a914.415.516.513.88.515.98.5301.571.4variable 13Tcrb-T-cell receptor beta,BF658725n/a961.51.71.61.21.61.81.77.37.1V8.2variable 8.2Tk1thymidine kinase 1NM_009387NM_0032581682.02.01.91.81.32.32.010.99.7BC007986Tymsthymidylate synthaseBM068975NM_001071170.91.01.11.01.50.70.78.34.7Trip13thyroid hormone receptorAK010336NM_004237183.22.82.52.02.42.72.118.115.1interactor 13TraipTRAF-interacting proteinNM_011634NM_00587941.91.61.21.61.21.01.124.19.1Tacc3transforming, acidicNM_011524NM_00634263.83.64.02.82.93.92.443.624.2coiled-coil containingAF289576protein 3Tpp2tripeptidyl peptidase IIBB484264NM_003291121.01.32.31.60.91.31.511.06.7Tnfrsf7tumor necrosis factorL24495n/a96.512.26.47.65.312.87.951.842.1receptor superfamily,member 7Ubl5ubiquitin-like 5AV210814NM_017703101.00.80.81.31.31.11.314.05.4AI479104Xlr4X-linked lymphocyte-NM_021365N/a627.69.510.310.35.28.97.0110.762.9regulated 4Zap70zeta-chain (TCR)NM_009539AB0832113313.920.216.318.010.619.713.490.060.0associated protein kinaseZnfn1a1zinc finger protein,NM_009578S80876305.77.15.64.23.78.03.439.226.4subfamily 1A, 1 (Ikaros)NM_006060NM_053213NM_031300301.51.61.31.70.71.71.524.410.4AV126179NM_01813182.00.81.90.80.81.11.219.712.1CLUSTER 2Bcl2a1aB-cell leukemia/lymphoma 2 related protein A1aL16462NM_0040497315.125.136.039.326.723.422.659.773.4Ccl3chemokine (C—C motif)NM_011337NM_002983616.125.154.733.951.132.631.743.928.9ligand 3Cd44CD44 antigenX66083AF098641516.316.053.431.841.023.616.561.348.2M24915NM_000610BC004372Gadd45bgrowth arrest and DNA-AK010420AF0878531083.82.84.65.64.94.93.46.811.6damage-inducible 45 betaAF078077NM_015675AV658684Ikbkeinhibitor of kappaB kinaseNM_019777NM_014002105.112.710.920.215.316.918.518.692.1epsilonAW340333Il10rainterleukin 10 receptor,NM_008348NM_001558108.813.219.120.418.112.913.728.026.7alphaIl16interleukin 16BB167822NM_004513420.41.42.32.21.32.11.26.711.8Il21rinterleukin 21 receptorAB049137AF269133167.09.58.510.88.18.78.821.870.4NM_021798AK093371Map3k8mitogen activated proteinNM_007746NM_005204146.46.110.511.39.77.67.920.927.8kinase 8Pglyrppeptidoglycan recognitionNM_009402NM_00509196.112.39.413.29.917.318.122.878.9proteinPim1proviral integration site 1AI323550n/a908.79.09.310.09.28.57.313.825.2PlekpleckstrinNM_019549NM_0026644117.829.928.730.728.033.625.540.540.6Runx1runt related transcriptionNM_009821U1960153.54.19.211.89.34.54.37.58.9factor 1D89788L34598NM_001754S76346D43968D43967Tap1transporter 1, ATP-BC024897n/a25710.311.410.513.49.312.611.512.323.1binding cassette, sub-family B (MDR/TAP)Trim30tripartite motif protein 30BG068242n/a1163.94.04.54.64.94.33.75.46.01300004C08RikRIKEN cDNAAK004894L13852614.64.79.16.87.36.05.47.810.71300004C08 geneNM_0033352610043M05RikRIKEN cDNABM247370NM_002719200.92.56.27.37.33.84.514.311.62610043M05 geneNCBINM_178586NCBINM_178587NCBINM_1785889030412M04RikRIKEN cDNAAK018504NM_014737383.55.15.36.66.74.95.07.613.39030412M04 geneNM_170773NCBINM_170774E430025L02RikRIKEN cDNABC027411NM_1985651204.26.45.86.36.57.77.68.411.8E430025L02 geneMGC41320hypothetical proteinBC006817NM_025079311.92.33.33.43.12.72.45.35.6MGC41320BC003855n/a1741.20.93.72.32.21.62.24.55.9BC003855n/a53.44.910.115.88.75.99.910.916.6BC003855n/a205.08.815.418.611.45.813.112.327.7CLUSTER 3Abca7ATP-binding cassette, sub-family A (ABC1), member 7NM_013850NM_0191121091.92.61.92.71.92.62.58.610.7Apbblip-amyloid beta (A4)BC023110NM_019043216.58.95.18.84.99.69.321.123.3pendingprecursor protein-binding,BC035636family B, member 1interacting proteinBatfbasic leucine zipperNM_016767NM_0063993110.011.69.611.37.28.38.720.423.5transcription factor, ATF-likeBcl11bB-cellNM_021399AB043584176.08.65.49.13.27.08.3101.8100.7lymphoma/leukaemia 11BNM_022898AA918317AU146285Brca1breast cancer 1U36475NM_00729494.25.25.04.53.35.23.436.036.3NCBINM_007295NCBINM_007296NCBINM_007297NCBINM_007298NCBINM_007299NCBINM_007300NCBINM_007301NCBINM_007302NCBINM_007303NCBINM_007304NCBINM_007305NCBINM_007306Brca1breast cancer 1U31625AF00506810.90.80.80.80.90.90.97.38.9NM_007295Cd37CD37 antigenBC019402NM_001774219.915.814.421.311.018.511.9106.1127.4Cd3dCD3 antigen, deltaNM_013487NM_000732842.159.060.848.931.866.938.2812.4910.7polypeptideCd3zCD3 antigen, zetaX84237J0413244.14.75.76.02.25.83.856.870.3polypeptideCep2centrosomal protein 2NM_008383NM_007186111.12.50.83.80.82.93.311.917.8Elmo1engulfment and cellBC006054NM_014800155.36.15.35.03.05.34.120.725.4motility 1, ced-12NCBIhomolog (C. elegans)NM_130442Fgf13fibroblast growth factor 13BC018238NM_0041142.73.11.62.91.14.22.115.412.9NM_033642Foxm1forkhead box M1AK008037NM_0336421.41.81.11.31.21.41.46.46.2Gfi1growth factor independent 1NM_010278NM_00526382.43.73.64.82.34.22.730.245.0Gzmcgranzyme CNM_010371n/a61.01.93.02.02.91.32.324.135.1Ian4immune associatedNM_031247NM_0183842762.63.62.33.12.03.63.414.019.0nucleotide 4AL080068AL080068Il12rb2interleukin 12 receptor,NM_008354NM_001559561.31.61.81.21.01.71.18.114.0beta 2Il2rainterleukin 2 receptor,M30856NM_000417761.81.61.11.21.11.71.011.222.0alpha chainIl2rginterleukin 2 receptor,L20048NM_0002061869.913.314.012.69.716.012.636.937.4gamma chainIrf4interferon regulatoryNM_013674NM_002460157.47.16.711.06.69.25.650.2102.7factor 4Itgalintegrin alpha LAF065902BC008777673.75.64.75.62.86.44.428.224.9Itgb7integrin beta 7NM_013566NM_0008893014.021.116.022.611.423.120.348.596.2AI807169ItkIL2-inducible T-cellNM_010583D13720810.717.115.520.38.215.413.7152.5152.4kinaseItkIL2-inducible T-cellL10628D13720172.23.53.44.61.44.51.733.233.6kinaseKcna3potassium voltage-gatedNM_008418NM_002232481.31.61.21.41.41.61.24.76.4channel, shaker-relatedsubfamily, member 3Latlinker for activation of TAF036907AF0369051832.135.525.031.517.943.834.9205.2179.7cellsAF036906Lef1lymphoid enhancerNM_010703AF294627192.32.30.91.80.81.51.722.644.6binding factor 1AF288571AW117601AI762816Ltblymphotoxin BNM_008518NM_002341841.166.452.270.230.365.559.8354.8366.2Ly108lymphocyte antigen 108AF248636NM_052931615.45.46.04.73.36.43.97.78.9Map4k1mitogen activated proteinBB546619NM_007181711.513.111.015.07.512.210.456.381.1kinase 1MGC37568hypothetical proteinAU043488BC00610777.211.211.418.74.813.011.181.564.9MGC37568MGC37914hypothetical proteinBC021614n/a892.63.42.43.01.53.42.421.920.7MGC37914Ms4a4cmembrane-spanning 4-NM_029499AF2379121368.28.37.04.03.48.54.416.724.7domains, subfamily A,AF354928member 4CNM_024021Mybmyeloblastosis oncogeneNM_033597NM_00537559.27.94.15.82.26.03.259.750.0Nfatc1nuclear factor of activatedAK004810NM_0061621502.94.33.83.82.74.53.37.913.5T-cells, cytoplasmic 1NM_172387NM_172388NM_172389NM_172390Pglyrpl-peptidoglycan recognitionNM_021319BE67239031.42.95.65.61.34.13.247.034.1pendingprotein-likePik3cdphosphatidylinositol 3-NM_008840U57843106.810.515.112.59.012.87.5111.8154.1kinase catalytic deltaU86453polypeptidePik3cdphosphatidylinositol 3-BB700084n/a1003.35.25.97.24.65.24.435.038.8kinase catalytic deltapolypeptidePlxnc1plexin C1BB765457NM_005761642.33.32.74.71.83.33.210.315.6Pom121nuclear pore membraneC80273AK022555662.22.52.33.42.12.52.26.46.9protein 121Prkcbprotein kinase C, betaBF660388NM_00273865.37.36.511.34.17.25.613.218.9NM_212535Rad51ap1RAD51 associated protein 1BC003738NM_006479712.12.01.31.51.32.21.710.211.3Rgs10regulator of G-proteinNM_026418NM_0029252082.53.34.04.13.13.74.09.011.1signaling 10AI744627Rgs19regulator of G-proteinBC003838NM_0058731044.14.95.05.34.55.24.215.916.1signaling 19Rog-repressor of GATAAK015881NM_0143831110.99.56.83.85.311.02.149.3143.0pendingSelplselectin, platelet (p-NM_009151U022971157.613.311.016.48.413.912.769.570.8selectin) ligandSema4dsema domain,NM_013660NM_0063781492.32.82.62.41.43.52.58.010.4immunoglobulin domain(Ig), transmembranedomain (TM) and shortcytoplasmic domain,(semaphorin) 4DSh3bp1SH3-domain bindingNM_009164NM_018957484.37.44.17.62.17.27.410.814.3protein 1AK024971Slc1a7solute carrier family 1,NM_009201AF1052302161.51.81.42.11.62.01.46.67.4member 7BC000986Slc2a3solute carrier family 2M75135NM_00693150.90.80.81.01.21.31.219.448.5(facilitated glucoseAL110298transporter), member 3Stat4signal transducer andNM_011487NM_00315187.410.512.010.57.68.28.7143.6144.0activator of transcription 4Stk10serine/threonine kinase 10NM_009288AB015718534.55.84.66.92.85.93.432.128.6NM_005990BE504180BE501281AF088069Tacc3transforming, acidicBB787809NM_006342772.82.41.92.22.12.81.611.719.3coiled-coil containingAF289576protein 3Tcrb-V13T-cell receptor beta,M87849n/a156.56.44.55.73.97.14.219.227.3variable 13Tcrb-T-cell receptor beta,BF318536n/a242.33.62.42.82.73.62.918.435.4V8.2variable 8.2Trim34tripartite motif protein 34NM_030684AB039904942.83.74.43.73.93.62.57.78.4NM_0216169-Sepseptin 9NM_017380AF1424084691.62.41.93.32.12.62.06.35.4AB023208NM_0066402310021G01RikRIKEN cDNAAK011289AY029179118.57.85.05.22.08.34.224.949.82310021G01 gene2700084L22RikRIKEN cDNANM_026024AB03293152.53.53.11.91.32.01.630.536.72700084L22 gene2810047L02RikRIKEN cDNAAV270035NM_016448283.33.53.23.12.04.12.524.927.92810047L02 gene2810425K19RikRIKEN cDNABC025911AF12185662.14.61.53.53.21.30.99.411.02810425K19 geneNM_0212493322402E17RikRIKEN cDNAAK014382AB00662861.11.30.81.51.61.71.313.834.53322402E17 gene3322402E17RikRIKEN cDNABF730694AB006628146.08.66.58.62.89.59.238.380.93322402E17 gene5031419I10RikRIKEN cDNABB474868NM_016573392.93.72.33.62.73.93.88.713.15031419I10 gene5830400A04RikRIKEN cDNABM243660NM_004310145.78.710.511.59.69.17.443.0102.25830400A04 gene9130017C17RikRIKEN cDNAAF395844AK055837743.74.54.24.23.74.04.17.87.79130017C17 geneAW104269AI081246AA521424AL161979A430104N18RikRIKEN cDNAAA254104n/a254.05.56.67.06.03.94.872.9125.6A430104N18 geneAA409164expressed sequenceBC006054n/a121.31.51.11.61.82.11.85.55.9AA409164AK004668NM_012452513.04.85.66.54.85.03.729.631.3Mus musculus BICAY096003n/a31.71.72.72.42.21.81.18.320.6noncoding mRNA,complete sequence.BG976607n/a752.92.32.42.21.12.41.39.412.6Mus musculus adultAW557946NM_016457612.83.33.74.82.63.33.418.522.3female vagina cDNA,RIKEN full-lengthenriched library,clone: 9930101D06product: PROTEINKINASE D2 homolog[Homo sapiens], full insertsequence.Mus musculus 9 daysAW552536n/a103.42.92.64.02.13.23.020.527.2embryo whole bodycDNA, RIKEN full-lengthenriched library,clone: D030060F23product: Mus musculusU22 snoRNA host gene(UHG) gene, completesequence, full insertsequence.Mus musculus adult maleBB014626n/a37.513.68.722.24.717.412.169.375.2testis cDNA, RIKEN full-length enriched library,clone: 4930483L24product: weakly similar toAT-HOOK PROTEINAKNA [Homo sapiens],full insert sequence.CLUSTER 4Adcy7adenylate cyclase 7BB746807NM_001114738.212.620.116.912.514.212.753.234.4AV278559expressed sequenceBC026563AA668763837.08.79.19.27.99.76.769.924.8AV278559C4st2-chondroitin 4-NM_021528NM_01864195.08.910.313.911.010.39.732.921.5pendingsulfotransferase 2BC002918BC029471BC029471C79673expressed sequenceBG066664NM_031471346.514.120.319.017.618.015.756.854.5C79673NM_178443Cd80CD80 antigenAA596883NM_005191311.51.01.92.31.71.21.69.85.2Cd8aCD8 antigen, alpha chainAK017889NM_0017681418.436.345.633.423.241.326.9100.284.3NM_171827Cd8bCD8 antigen, beta chainU34882AW2963092226.939.650.340.024.847.129.1251.6111.8NM_172100NM_004931Crmp1collapsin responseAB006714NM_001313141.92.67.33.74.53.53.969.88.7mediator protein 1Cxcr6chemokine (C—X—C motif)NM_030712NM_006564135.317.834.227.916.211.814.6434.815.9receptor 6Dock2dedicator of cyto-kinesis 2NM_033374D869641917.128.936.446.623.928.930.0200.5116.4BC016996E430024D12hypothetical proteinAV173260AI34254365.28.710.810.310.110.79.1155.566.1E430024D12Evi2ecotropic viral integrationBB201368NM_0064951914.224.527.024.519.920.916.9107.455.5site 2Flt3lFMS-like tyrosine kinaseL23636U03858431.82.23.32.82.52.32.214.38.13 ligandNM_001459Glipr2GLI pathogenesis-related 2AK017557NM_0223431711.111.523.620.714.223.016.3118.467.9Gng2guanine nucleotideBC021599NM_0530641410.316.528.015.724.017.714.1182.845.9binding protein (Gprotein), gamma 2 subunitGpr34G protein-coupledNM_011823NM_00530051.01.32.12.52.30.92.016.56.9receptor 34Hcls1hematopoietic cell specificNM_008225NM_005335831.044.151.348.233.344.836.1175.375.3Lyn substrate 1Hcsthematopoietic cell signalAF172930AF2854472281.31.52.02.01.61.81.78.94.7transducerIl18r1interleukin 18 receptor 1NM_008365NM_003855608.810.95.810.88.710.17.875.919.1Klrc1killer cell lectin-likeAF106008NM_00226058.716.633.220.313.320.310.1331.411.3receptor subfamily C,NM_002261member 1Klrd1killer cell lectin-likeNM_010654U306102714.419.428.322.527.922.918.8489.994.6receptor, subfamily D,AB009597member 1NM_007334Ly75lymphocyte antigen 75NM_013825NM_002349301.62.52.53.02.41.91.56.24.1Ly9lymphocyte antigen 9NM_008534NM_00234878.213.322.919.419.718.416.582.242.8Myolgmyosin IGBB235320NM_033054987.28.410.611.06.38.78.170.329.0Pik3cgphosphoinositide-3-kinase,BB205102AF327656202.73.96.35.83.93.73.119.811.3catalytic, gammaNM_002649polypeptidePlcl2phospholipase C-like 2BM207017NM_0151841442.42.84.13.74.83.63.38.16.9PlekpleckstrinAF303745NM_0026642217.017.125.615.220.420.415.131.125.7Rgs16regulator of G-proteinU94828U9482936.513.312.216.314.516.513.917.18.7signaling 16Ripk3receptor-interactingNM_019955NM_006871485.56.811.77.410.18.26.327.615.1serine-threonine kinase 3Runx2runt related transcriptionD14636L40992523.14.64.07.14.03.93.246.116.8factor 2NM_004348NM_004348AL353944Slasrc-like adaptorNM_009192NM_0067481024.05.15.84.85.25.63.813.69.6Sla2Src-like-adaptor 2AF287467AF290986241.58.16.35.92.96.63.123.515.7Sp100nuclear antigen Sp100U83636AF056322892.52.93.53.52.53.32.728.110.0U36501U36501NM_003113NM_003113Tcrb-V13T-cell receptor beta,U63547n/a51.53.03.42.31.22.21.426.67.8variable 13Tcrg-V2T-cell receptor gamma,X03802n/a221.92.12.84.63.11.93.116.711.8variable 2Tnfsf6tumor necrosis factorNM_010177AF288573731.82.44.24.22.82.83.057.720.3(ligand) superfamily,D38122member 6Tpm3tropomyosin 3, gammaNM_022314AF362887165.74.26.34.24.84.02.926.08.9AF362887AY004867BC000771X04201Trex1three prime repairNM_011637AJ2437971006.76.09.98.47.59.36.912.08.3exonuclease 1NM_130384NM_016381BC002903Trim12tripartite motif protein 12BM244351n/a32.03.77.15.43.14.03.130.617.2Vav1vav 1 oncogeneNM_011691NM_00542874.77.27.28.28.67.35.826.317.32410004L22RikRIKEN cDNANM_029621NM_033417234.57.07.67.35.46.36.324.816.82410004L22 gene2810433K01RikRIKEN cDNANM_025581BF03846121.01.42.31.21.01.10.933.29.22810433K01 gene4930422C14hypothetical proteinBM241008n/a3315.117.120.711.415.620.010.1202.245.14930422C149830126M18hypothetical proteinBM224662NM_0190181243.34.54.84.64.54.63.812.86.89830126M18NM_011558n/a257.410.930.718.621.29.714.1138.943.4Mus musculus adult female vagina cDNA, RIKEN full-lengthBB204677NM_016457811.71.82.72.32.82.01.65.85.7enriched library, clone: 9930101D06 product: PROTEINKINASE D2 homolog [Homo sapiens], full insertsequence.CLUSTER 5Pdcd1programmed cell death 1NM_008798NM_0050181315.625.738.327.521.926.917.622.918.5Socs1suppressor of cytokineAB000710AB0050434610.59.37.59.37.113.38.67.926.9signaling 1U88326Stat1signal transducer and activator of transcription 1NM_009283NM_00731535917.115.023.214.118.115.913.87.111.7NM_139266BC002065n/a9545.042.681.150.968.856.848.513.733.4
Numbers indicate signal strength for NCBA and fold changes versus NCBA for allografts and lymphocyte cultures.

The abbreviations are as follows:

NCBA = normal CBA kidney;

WT allografts = CBA kidneys rejecting in wild-type B6 hosts;

IghKO allografts = CBA kidneys rejecting in B-cell deficient B6 hosts;

CTL = CTL clone;

MLRD4 = mixed lymphocyte culture day 4;

D5 = day 5 post transplant.


Expression of CA Ts in Allografts Rejecting in B-Cell Deficient Hosts


Whether the absence of B cells affects T-cell mediated rejection was analyzed by comparing CAT expression in kidneys rejecting in wild-type hosts to those rejecting in IghKO hosts at day 7 and day 21. The level of expression of CATs in grafts rejecting in IghKO hosts was highly correlated with that in wild-type hosts (D7: r=0.98; D21: r=0.98). The mean expression of the five clusters of CATs was also similar in IghKO versus wild-type hosts (FIG. 8), but was slightly higher in IghKO at day 7 (mean 23.2 percent in wild-type versus 25.3 percent in IghKO of the signal in the CTL clone) and lower in IghKO at day 21 (mean 26.2 percent in wild-type compared to the CTL clone versus 21.1 percent in IghKO).


In summary, the relationship between the pathologic Banff lesions of kidney rejection and the transcriptome, particularly in the CTL-associated transcripts, was studied. The interstitial infiltrate was established by day 5 and stable after day 7, whereas tubulitis and arteritis evolved slowly and progressively, being absent at day 5 and fully developed only after 14 days. The transcriptome changed markedly by day 5, with appearance of T cell and macrophage CD antigen transcripts. A set of CATs present in d4MLR and in a CTL clone but absent in normal kidney were identified. The CATs appeared in the transplants with a mean signal intensity about one fifth of that in the CTL clone, and was independent of B cells and alloantibody. In addition, CAT expression was essentially constant from day 5 through 42, despite massive changes in the histopathology. Thus, CTL transcripts appear early in rejecting kidneys, before the diagnostic Banff lesions, and persist for at least 6 weeks, providing a robust measurement of this aspect of rejection. This permits separation of the effectors of rejection, CTL, from the downstream consequences, parenchymal deterioration and pathologic lesions. In addition, CAT expression provides an approximation of the effector T cell burden and activity in rejecting kidneys. The interpretation of the CAT expression does not depend on the assumption that CATs are expressed exclusively in CTL, although it is likely that CTL account for most CAT expression.


The CD transcripts provide an overview of leukocyte population changes, and support the concept of a CTL and macrophage infiltrate with late B cell infiltration indicated by the histologic analysis. There is no real “gold standard” unbiased assessment of the composition of the infiltrate in rejecting transplants: both immunostaining of sections and cell isolation have potential for errors. Nevertheless, the arrays' estimates are fully compatible with estimates based on these methods. CD transcripts with high expression in CTL and d4MLR increased early during rejection and persisted throughout the time course, consistent with CTL infiltration and supporting the contention that CATs in the rejecting kidneys reflect transcripts in effector T cells. The macrophage markers CD14 and CD68 were present in rejecting kidneys, with low expression in CTL and d4MLR, consistent with macrophage infiltration. B cell markers CD79A and CD79B were present in d4MLR but not CTL, and appeared late in rejection, reflecting late B cell infiltration. There were few CD4+ cells in the infiltrate by immunostaining, and CD4 expression in the microarrays was low, in keeping with rejection being mainly driven by CD8+ CTL.


The constancy of CAT expression over weeks establishes a new concept of T cell mediated rejection, namely that CTL generated from secondary lymphoid organs create and maintain a constant state in which the parenchyma progressively changes, yielding the pathologic lesions. The surprising stability of CAT levels over time suggests that the CTLs in the graft are occupying a finite “space,” similar to other emerging concepts of space in the secondary lymphoid organs (Stockinger et al., Immunology, 111(3):241-247 (2004)). The differences in the regression coefficients indicate that relative expression of individual CATs was consistent over time in vivo, although somewhat altered relative to the patterns of expression in vitro in the d4MLR and CTL clone. The moderate differences in relative expression of transcripts in the in vivo grafts versus the in vitro conditions may reflect different stimuli for CTL in these conditions (e.g., CD44). Other cells may also be recruited to express selected CAT in vivo: transcripts in cluster 5 exhibited high expression in vivo, perhaps reflecting IFN-γ effects (e.g., STAT1). The algorithm defining CATs, however, may exclude most IFN-γ inducible genes.


B cells do appear late in kidney rejection in this model but have no critical role, either as antigen presenting cells or alloantibody producing cells. Grafts in IghKO hosts exhibited very similar CAT expression to those in wild-type hosts by regression analysis, with slightly higher mean CAT expression at day 7 and lower at day 21. The small decline in CAT expression at day 21 in B cell deficient hosts suggest a role of B cells as second line antigen presenting cells sustaining CTL generation in secondary lymphoid organs.


The sustained expression of transcripts associated with cytotoxicity (e.g., perforin, granzymes A and B) in rejecting grafts raises the question of the role of cytotoxic mechanisms. Typical lesions develop in mice lacking perforin or granzyme A plus granzyme B (Halloran et al., Am. J. Transplant., 4(5):705-712 (2004)). Fas ligand (Tnfsf6) is expressed in CTL and rejecting grafts, but is not necessary for organ rejection across MHC disparities (Larsen et al., Transplant, 60(3):221-224 (1995)). Thus, the alterations in the parenchyma could reflect non-cytotoxic CTL and macrophage products, acting either by direct engagement or by indirect actions, e.g., extracellular matrix alterations triggering secondary changes in the epithelium. On the other hand, the lytic mechanisms such as perforin, granzymes, and Fas ligand could contribute to homeostasis, through fratricide of T cells (Huang et al., Science, 286(5441):952-954 (1999)) or interactions with antigen presenting cells (Ludewig et al., Eur. J. Immunol., 31(6): 1772-1779 (2001)).


CAT expression can be used in estimating the burden of CTL in rejecting grafts, by analogy with viral load measurements in viral diseases. Moreover, although CD8+ CTL were used as the basis of the effector T cell signature, the definition of CATs probably includes most transcripts in CD4+ effector T cells. Less is known about effector CD4+ T cells in rejection, perhaps because CD8+ effectors develop more rapidly after short term stimulation (Seder and Ahmed, Nat. Immunol., 4(9):835-842 (2003)). CD4+ T cells may play a bigger role in human kidney allograft rejection than in mice, although in human rejection CD8+ T cells predominate (Hancock et al., Transplant, 35(5):458-463 (1983)). CD4+ effectors that home to inflammatory sites share many properties with CD8+ effectors, e.g., IFN-γ production, expression of P-selectin ligand and CXCR3, absence of CCR7 (Campbell et al., Nat. Immunol., 2(9):876-881 (2001)). Other transcript sets can be developed to reflect distinct events in a disease state, e.g., IFN-γ inducible transcripts or macrophage-associated transcripts.


Example 2
Kidney Rejection in Humans

Human Database and Comparison with Mouse Transcripts


Data obtained from the mouse model were compared to the gene expression data obtained from human kidney biopsies from nine living donor controls, seven recipients with histologically confirmed acute rejection, five recipients with renal dysfunction without rejection on biopsy, and 10 protocol biopsies carried out more than one year post-transplant in patients with good transplant function and normal histology. Microarray data from these biopsies were obtained from a database available on the World Wide Web at scrips.edu/services/dna_array/. Flechner et al., Halloran laboratory Reference Manager # 18134: Am. J. Transplant., 4(9):1475-1489 (2004)). Raw data were normalized as described herein for the mouse data, using the donor biopsies as controls. In GeneSpring, a homology database was created for the mouse and human data, and gene lists of interest were then used for supervised hierarchical clustering of the human biopsy samples.


CTL Gene Expression in Human Kidney Transplant Biopsies


The following was performed to determine whether or not the transcriptome pattern observed in mouse CTL and in rejecting mouse kidney reflects the rejection process in human transplant kidneys. A set of human kidney biopsies was analyzed based on the CTL signature identified in the mouse model. The database includes biopsies of normal kidneys (healthy donor biopsies), control biopsies of well functioning kidney transplants, rejecting transplants, and transplants with dysfunction but no rejection. The expression of CTL genes identified in mice in a published database of human renal transplants was examined. Of the 284 mouse CTL transcripts, 164 corresponding transcripts in the human database were identified. Supervised hierarchical cluster analysis based on the CTL transcripts separated the rejecting transplants from the other samples. In rejecting transplants, gene expression of CTL transcripts was increased compared to normal transplants with dysfunction but no rejection. Compared to donor biopsies, control biopsies of well functioning transplants had decreased expression of a subset of CTL transcripts, possibly due to immunosuppressive treatment. Another subset of transcripts exhibited increased expression in control biopsies, indicating some CTL activity in the transplant; however, expression levels were much lower than in rejecting kidneys. A class prediction model based on two classes (rejection—no rejection) identified 19 of the 21 samples correctly based on the expression of CTL transcripts in transplant biopsies (using the 100 best predictor genes (Fisher's Exact Test) and K-nearest neighbors (K=4)). The two samples that could not be classified were diagnosed as “borderline rejection” (AR5) and “tubular nephropathy” (NR5) based on histologic criteria.


In a first analysis of human kidney biopsies, the set of CTL genes identified in the mouse model exhibited striking upregulation in rejecting kidneys and permitted identification of samples from rejecting transplants without further refinement, indicating that the transcriptome patterns observed in rejecting mouse kidney reflect the rejection process in human transplant kidneys. Although this analysis includes only a limited number of human biopsies and may require verification and further refinement in a large patient population, this is a first indication that analysis of the CTL pattern in the transcriptome of kidney biopsies can be used as a diagnostic tool. Addition of other elements of the transcriptome to the CTL gene set may improve the diagnostic power, therefore allowing refinement of the gene set and reduction of the number of transcripts required for a diagnosis. The clinical application of this knowledge can involve either a microarray system using large numbers of genes or an RT-PCR system, depending on an evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, cost, and practicability. Based on the observation in the mouse model that transcriptome changes occur early before tubulitis develops, this approach can be more sensitive and quantitative than evaluation by histopathology and could be developed for use as an endpoint in clinical trials.


Example 3
CATs Identified Using a Second Algorithm

A second, more refined algorithm was used to identify CATs. This method involved RMA (robust multichip analysis). CATs were identified based on the following: a signal of less than 50 in normal kidneys in all three strains (CBA, B6, and Balbc); five times higher in CTL, MLR, and CD8 compared to normal kidneys; significantly (p (fdr)<0.01) higher in MLR versus normal kidney; two times increased in wild type allografts (CBA into B6) at day 5 compared to normal kidney; and significant in comparison to normal kidney (p(fdr)<0.01). This algorithm produced a list of 332 CATs, 91 of which were included in the original list of 287 CATs. The new list was checked for polymorphisms that would have been excluded if there had been any polymorphisms (5× difference between the strains or genes that are known to be highly polymorphic e.g., TCR, NKR, Ig, MHC). The list of 332 CATs is provided in Table 5.

TABLE 5CATs identified using an RMA-based algorithm.LocusSystematicSymbolTitleGenbankSwissprotUnigenelink1424965_atLpxnleupaxinBC0265630Mm.3131361073211416016_atTap1transporter 1, ATP-AW048052P21958,Mm.20799621354binding cassette, sub-Q62427,family BQ62428,(MDR/TAP)Q62429,Q643331425226_x_atTcrb-V13T-cell receptor beta,M161200Mm.333026269846variable 131433935_atAU020206expressed sequenceBI1513310Mm.200422101757AU0202061419194_s_atGmfgglia maturationNM_0220240Mm.19453663986factor, gamma1451174_atLrrc33leucine rich repeatBC0274110Mm.33498224109containing 331454169_a_atEpstilepithelial stromalAK0171740Mm.68134108670interaction 1 (breast)1449127_atSelplselectin, platelet (p-NM_009151Q62170Mm.33259020345selectin) ligand1436199_atTrim14Tripartite motif-AU0425320Mm.24025274735containing 141436423_atE430004N04RikRIKEN cDNABE6285230Mm.123021210757E430004N04 gene1439595_atTcraT-cell receptor alphaBM2436430Mm.21324821473chain1452352_atCtla2bcytotoxic TBG0646560013025lymphocyte-associated protein 2beta1437886_atKlhl6kelch-like 6BM2471040Mm.86699239743(Drosophila)1460245_atKlrd1killer cell lectin-likeNM_010654O54707,Mm.818616643receptor, subfamilyO54708D, member 11449925_atCxcr3chemokine (C—X—CNM_009910O88410Mm.1287612766motif) receptor 31436212_atAI661017expressed sequenceAV1732600Mm.132299213068AI6610171444088_atSimilar to T-cellBE447255P04212Mm.347827381764receptor beta chainVNDNJC precursor1440811_x_atCd8aCD8 antigen, alphaBB030365P01731,Mm.185812525chainQ609651456064_atAI504432expressed sequenceAI3236240Mm.347584229694AI5044321448759_atIl2rbinterleukin 2M28052P16297Mm.3528716185receptor, beta chain1417597_atCd28CD28 antigenNM_007642P31041Mm.255003124871429270_a_at1700013H19RikRIKEN cDNAAK0059540Mm.229128718461700013H19 gene1426025_s_atLaptm5lysosomal-associatedU29539Q61168,Mm.27186816792proteinQ60924transmembrane 51449220_atGimap3GTPase, IMAPNM_0312470Mm.33305083408family member 31420876_a_at6-Sepseptin 6NM_0199420Mm.260036565261456494_a_atTrim30tripartite motifBG068242P15533Mm.29557820128,protein 302093871436570_atTranscribed locusBG1434610Mm.2389701419178_atCd3gCD3 antigen, gammaM58149P11942Mm.33510612502polypeptide1434280_atBG9766070001448713_atStat4signal transducer andNM_011487P42228Mm.155020849activator oftranscription 41417171_atItkIL2-inducible T-cellNM_010583Q03526Mm.33992716428kinase1416118_atNM_0258630001423760_atCd44CD44 antigenM27130P15379Mm.330428125051434929_atBC035044cDNA sequenceBI0768090Mm.373829232406BC0350441454764_s_atTranscribed locusBF1656810Mm.37697201416956_atKcnab2potassium voltage-U31908P62482Mm.30249616498gated channel,shaker-relatedsubfamily, betamember 21417546_atIl2rbinterleukin 2M28052P16297Mm.3528716185receptor, beta chain1419569_a_atIsg20interferon-stimulatedBC0227510Mm.32284357444protein1454850_atTbc1d10cTBC1 domain family,AV0604170Mm.288312108995member 10c1434380_atDiabeticBM2412710Mm.2548510nephropathy-likeprotein (Dnr12)mRNA, partialsequence1426396_atCd3zCD3 antigen, zetaAK017904P29020,Mm.21730812503polypeptideP241611443937_atIl2rbInterleukin 2BE634648P16297Mm.3528716185receptor, beta chain1454893_at1110013L07RikRIKEN cDNABB7658520Mm.274708685211110013L07 gene1418842_atHcls1hematopoietic cellNM_008225P49710Mm.409115163specific Lyn substrate 11425396_a_atLcklymphocyte proteinBC011474P06240Mm.29375316818tyrosine kinase1429197_s_atRabgap1lRAB GTPaseBB4316540Mm.2583329809activating protein 1-like1436097_x_atArhgap9Rho GTPaseBB3274180Mm.227198216445activating protein 91438439_atGpr171G protein-coupledBB2296160Mm.123648229323receptor 1711431592_a_atSh3kbp1SH3-domain kinaseAK0072830Mm.28649558194binding protein 11455899_x_atSocs3suppressor ofBB241535O35718Mm.346812702cytokine signaling 31419193_a_atGmfgglia maturationNM_0220240Mm.19453663986factor, gamma1457725_at0Similar to membrane-BB2214060Mm.233909381214spanning 4-domains,subfamily A, member4C; membrane-spanning 4-domains,subfamily A, member 91434745_atCcnd2cyclin D2BQ175880P30280Mm.333406124441423614_atLrrc8cleucine rich repeatBB3294080Mm.319847100604containing 8 family,member C1427539_a_atZwintZW10 interactorBC0135590Mm.62876526961454632_at6330442E10RikRIKEN cDNAAV3285150Mm.3417472685676330442E10 gene1424542_atS100a4S100 calcium bindingD00208P07091Mm.392520198protein A41435331_atAI447904expressed sequenceBM2410080Mm.360525236312AI4479041448441_atCks1bCDC28 proteinNM_016904P61025Mm.304954124kinase 1b1436171_atArhgap30Rho GTPaseBM2449990Mm.251048226652activating protein 301455576_at5830482F20RikRIKEN cDNAAW4935830Mm.746323204355830482F20 gene1417104_atEmp3epithelial membraneBC001999O35912Mm.2082913732protein 31424727_atCcr5chemokine (C—CD83648P51682Mm.1430212774motif) receptor 51419033_at2610018G03RikRIKEN cDNAAW5568210Mm.377135704152610018G03 gene1416246_a_atCoro1acoronin, actin bindingBC002136O89053Mm.29048212721protein 1A1439956_at0Adult male aorta andBE6924250Mm.1234040vein cDNA, RIKENfull-length enrichedlibrary,clone: A530049N04product: unknownEST, full insertsequence1433466_atAI467606expressed sequenceBB2343370Mm.284102101602AI4676061424560_atPstpip1proline-serine-U87814P97814Mm.253419200threoninephosphatase-interacting protein 11425947_atIfnginterferon gammaK00083P01580Mm.240327159781460338_a_atCrlf3cytokine receptor-likeBB1612530Mm.27209354394factor 31450698_atDusp2dual specificityL11330Q05922Mm.472913537phosphatase 21438052_atA130071D04RikRIKEN cDNABM23943600320791A130071D04 gene1425335_atCd8aCD8 antigen, alphaM12825P01731,Mm.185812525chainQ609651455898_x_atSlc2a3solute carrier familyBB414515P32037,Mm.269857205272 (facilitated glucoseQ61607transporter), member 31419135_atLtblymphotoxin BNM_008518P41155Mm.1715169941416022_atFabp5fatty acid bindingBC002008Q05816Mm.74116592protein 5, epidermal1434873_a_atCentb1centaurin, beta 1BB1159020Mm.2886712168591460419_a_atPrkcb1protein kinase C, beta 1X59274P68404Mm.207496187511441677_atSmc4l1SMC4 structuralBM2441440Mm.20684170099maintenance ofchromosomes 4-like1 (yeast)1448500_a_atLime1Lck interactingNM_0236840Mm.27271272699transmembraneadaptor 11447788_s_atAW212607expressed sequenceBB3085320Mm.277243241732AW2126071424927_atGlipr1GLI pathogenesis-BC0250830Mm.17379073690related 1 (glioma)1455000_atGpr68G protein-coupledBB5383720Mm.32160238377receptor 681439034_atSpnsialophorinBB1605860Mm.283714207371425854_x_atTcrb-V13T-cell receptor beta,U076610Mm.333026269846variable 131418126_atCcl5chemokine (C—CNM_013653P30882Mm.28424820304motif) ligand 51437176_atLOC434341similar to nucleotide-AV27744400434341bindingoligomerizationdomains 271424278_a_atBirc5baculoviral IAPBC004702O70201Mm.855211799repeat-containing 51424923_atSerpina3gserine (or cysteine)BC002065Q62259Mm.26470920715proteinase inhibitor,clade A, member 3G1435529_at0Brain CRL-1443BM2459610Mm.3719560BC3H1 cDNA,RIKEN full-lengthenriched library,clone: G430091H17product: weaklysimilar toGLUCOCORTICOID-ATTENUATEDRESPONSE GENE16 PRODUCT[Rattus norvegicus],full insert sequence1416296_atIl2rginterleukin 2L20048P34902Mm.292316186receptor, gammachain1424181_at38966septin 6BC0104890Mm.260036565261451099_atMbc2membrane bound C2BC0114820Mm.6605623943domain containingprotein1426652_atMcm3minichromosomeBI658327P25206Mm.450217215maintenance deficient3 (S. cerevisiae)1416869_x_atLime1Lck interactingNM_0236840Mm.27271272699transmembraneadaptor 11452954_atUbe2cubiquitin-conjugatingAV1624590Mm.8983068612enzyme E2C1440196_at03 days neonateBB2076110Mm.18910thymus cDNA,RIKEN full-lengthenriched library,clone: A630020E03product: unknownEST, full insertsequence1452117_a_atFybFYN binding proteinBB157866O35601Mm.170905238801450842_a_atCenpacentromereAV132173O35216Mm.29056312615autoantigen A1427325_s_atAI597013expressed sequenceBB0146260Mm.258930100182AI5970131437432_a_atTrim12tripartite motifBM2443510Mm.32703376681protein 121418980_a_atCnp1cyclic nucleotideM58045P16330Mm.1571112799phosphodiesterase 11427007_at1200013B08RikRIKEN cDNAAK0047340Mm.276131741311200013B08 gene1435945_a_atKcnn4potassiumBG865910O89109Mm.991116534intermediate/smallconductance calcium-activated channel,subfamily N, member 41451910_a_atCd6CD6 antigenU12434Q61003Mm.290897125111422808_s_atDock2dedicator of cytokinesis 2NM_0333740Mm.217288941761423895_a_atCugbp2CUG triplet repeat,BB6441640Mm.14709114007RNA binding protein 21418770_atCd2CD2 antigenNM_013486P08920Mm.22842124811418465_atNcf4neutrophil cytosolicNM_008677P97369Mm.206817972factor 41418641_atLcp2lymphocyte cytosolicBC006948Q60787Mm.26535016822protein 21448409_atLrmplymphoid-restrictedNM_008511Q60664Mm.84316970membrane protein1436953_atWaspipWiskott-AldrichC769690Mm.223504215280syndrome proteininteracting protein1416619_at4632428N05RikRIKEN cDNABC0039670Mm.273584740484632428N05 gene1417898_a_atGzmagranzyme ANM_010370P11032Mm.15510149381449393_atSh2d1aSH2 domain proteinNM_011364O88890Mm.235391204001A1438577_at0Transcribed locusBB3769470Mm.13004001416759_atMical1microtubuleNM_1383150Mm.290431171580associatedmonoxygenase,calponin and LIMdomain containing 11436905_x_atLaptm5lysosomal-associatedBB218107Q61168,Mm.27186816792proteinQ60924transmembrane 51418396_atGpsm3G-protein signallingNM_1341160Mm.26584106512modulator 3 (AGS3-like, C. elegans)1424724_a_atD16Ertd472eDNA segment, ChrBC0199570Mm.373326710216, ERATO Doi 472,expressed1429947_a_atZbp1Z-DNA bindingAK0081790Mm.11668758203protein 11448748_atPlekpleckstrinAF1818290Mm.98232561931417620_atRac2RAS-related C3NM_009008Q05144Mm.197219354botulinum substrate 21427911_at2610307O08RikRIKEN cDNAAK0120060Mm.45995725122610307O08 gene1451154_a_atCugbp2CUG triplet repeat,BB6441640Mm.14709114007RNA binding protein 21416008_atSatb1special AT-richAV172776Q60611Mm.31165520230sequence bindingprotein 11442700_atPde4bphosphodiesteraseBG7934930Mm.20181185784B, cAMP specific1437249_atScap1src family associatedBG0755620Mm.34072078473phosphoprotein 11438475_at00BM2464620001421931_atIcosinducible T-cell co-AB0231320Mm.4204454167stimulator1419206_atCd37CD37 antigenBC019402Q61470Mm.3689124931449175_atGpr65G-protein coupledNM_008152Q61038Mm.20752814744receptor 651422701_atZap70zeta-chain (TCR)NM_009539P43404,Mm.803822637associated proteinP97455kinase1450291_s_atMs4a4cmembrane-spanningNM_0224290Mm.353643643804-domains, subfamilyA, member 4C1417601_atRgs1regulator of G-proteinNM_0158110Mm.10370150778signaling 11437072_atArhgap25Rho GTPaseBM2412180Mm.119564232201activating protein 251436847_s_atCdca8cell division cycleBB7020470Mm.2803852276associated 81457404_atNfkbiznuclear factor ofBM2400580Mm.24727280859kappa lightpolypeptide geneenhancer in B-cellsinhibitor, zeta1421173_atIrf4interferon regulatoryU34307Q64287Mm.467716364factor 41416295_a_atIl2rginterleukin 2L20048P34902Mm.292316186receptor, gammachain1428242_at6330406L22RikRIKEN cDNAAK0181300Mm.243954707196330406L22 gene1418392_a_atGbp4guanylate nucleotideNM_018734Q61107Mm.190955932binding protein 41437025_atCd28CD28 antigenAV313615P31041Mm.255003124871422637_atRassf5Ras associationNM_018750O70407Mm.24829154354(RalGDS/AF-6)domain family 51439323_a_atMap4k1mitogen activatedBB546619P70218Mm.14827826411protein kinase kinasekinase kinase 11424674_atSlc39a6solute carrier familyBB8250020Mm.2168810695739 (metal iontransporter), member 61434920_a_atEvlEna-vasodilatorAW553781P70429Mm.23884114026stimulatedphosphoprotein1415850_atRasa3RAS p21 proteinNM_009025Q60790Mm.1851719414activator 31435560_at00BI5544460001428735_atCd69CD69 antigenAK0179790Mm.74745125151434573_atTraf3ip3TRAF3 interactingBE9865880Mm.261259215243protein 31419060_atGzmbgranzyme BNM_013542P04187Mm.14874149391450241_a_atEvi2aecotropic viralNM_010161P20934Mm.16494814017integration site 2a1442219_atMs4a6bMembrane-spanningBB2189650Mm.278844697744-domains, subfamilyA, member 6B1460337_atSh3kbp1SH3-domain kinaseBB3269290Mm.28649558194binding protein 11425084_atGimap7GTPase, IMAPBC0262000Mm.30479231932family member 71435343_atDock10dedicator ofBF7150430Mm.133473210293cytokinesis 101436598_atIcosinducible T-cell co-AV3139230Mm.4204454167stimulator1422612_atHk2hexokinase 2NM_013820O08528Mm.255848152771423135_atThy1thymus cell antigen 1,AV028402P01831Mm.395121838theta1439436_x_atIncenpinner centromereBB4187020Mm.2975516319protein1426505_atEvi2becotropic viralAI12241500216984integration site 2b1420515_a_atPglyrp2peptidoglycanNM_0213190Mm.8675257757recognition protein 21448511_atPtprcapprotein tyrosineNM_016933Q64697Mm.32968619265phosphatase, receptortype, C polypeptide-associated protein1442338_at0Transcribed locusBB7409040Mm.3574601417391_a_atIl16interleukin 16BC026894O54824Mm.10137161701434376_atCd44CD44 antigenAW146109P15379Mm.330428125051433465_a_atAI467606expressed sequenceBB2343370Mm.284102101602AI4676061460253_atCklfsf7chemokine-like factorNM_1339780Mm.35600102545super family 71429028_atDock11dedicator ofAK0171700Mm.3287375974cytokinesis 111428787_atNckap11NCK associatedBM2389060Mm.30805105855protein 1 like1436576_atA630077B13RikRIKEN cDNABB2394290Mm.34479215900A630077B13 gene1440481_at00BB2298530001418353_atCd5CD5 antigenNM_007650P13379Mm.779125071427301_atCd48CD48 antigenBE634960P18181Mm.1738125061417756_a_atLsp1lymphocyte specific 1NM_019391P19973Mm.234003169851422812_atCxcr6chemokine (C—X—CNM_0307120Mm.12428980901motif) receptor 61456307_s_atAdcy7Adenylate cyclase 7BB746807P51829Mm.288206115131418131_atSamhd1SAM domain and HDNM_018851Q60710Mm.24847856045domain, 11455132_atA430107D22RikRIKEN cDNAAV3126630Mm.122284320484A430107D22 gene1440275_atRunx3Runt relatedAV233043Q64131,Mm.24749312399transcription factor 3O886741417786_a_atRgs19regulator of G-proteinBC0038380Mm.27436656470signaling 191448449_atRipk3receptor-interactingNM_0199550Mm.4661256532serine-threoninekinase 31422632_atCtswcathepsin WNM_009985P56203Mm.113590130411454694_a_atTop2atopoisomeraseBM211413Q01320Mm.423721973(DNA) II alpha1434940_x_atRgs19regulator of G-proteinBB2336700Mm.27436656470signaling 191449156_atLy9lymphocyte antigen 9NM_008534Q01965Mm.560170851435084_atC730049O14RikRIKEN cDNABB2006070Mm.209644320117C730049O14 gene1420819_atSlasrc-like adaptorNM_009192Q60898Mm.7601204911434067_atAI662270expressed sequenceBE6884100Mm.295569103814AI6622701416007_atSatb1special AT-richAV172776Q60611Mm.31165520230sequence bindingprotein 11452087_atEpsti1epithelial stromalBF0206400Mm.68134108670interaction 1 (breast)1436649_atZfpn1a3RIKEN cDNABB151746O08900Mm.133367227805830411O07 gene1449235_atFaslFas ligand (TNFNM_010177P41047Mm.335514103superfamily, member6)1450639_atSlc28a2solute carrier familyNM_021520O88627Mm.29510269346,28 (sodium-coupled381417nucleosidetransporter), member 21416076_atCcnb1-rs1cyclin B1, relatedNM_007629P24860Mm.26011412429,sequence 1268697,434175,5450211421038_a_atKcnn4potassiumNM_008433O89109Mm.991116534intermediate/smallconductance calcium-activated channel,subfamily N, member 41447792_x_at0Adult male thymusBB2418470Mm.1797980cDNA, RIKEN full-length enrichedlibrary,clone: 5830404C02product: unknownEST, full insertsequence1419598_atMs4a6dmembrane-spanningNM_0268350Mm.290390687744-domains, subfamilyA, member 6D1426159_x_atTcrb-V13T-cell receptor beta,U468410Mm.333026269846variable 131456014_s_atBC032204cDNA sequenceBB1131730Mm.157591108101BC0322041443534_at00BM2010950001419226_atCd96CD96 antigenNM_0324650Mm.29204845441428696_at2310015N21RikRIKEN cDNAAK0093720Mm.41854764382310015N21 gene1448314_atCdc2acell division cycle 2NM_007659P11440Mm.28136712534homolog A (S. pombe)1424443_atTm6sf1transmembrane 6AV378394P58749Mm.221412107769superfamily member 11433826_atAW212607expressed sequenceAV3251520Mm.277243241732AW2126071455269_a_atCoro1acoronin, actin bindingBB740218O89053Mm.29048212721protein 1A1450106_a_atEvlEna-vasodilatorNM_007965P70429Mm.23884114026stimulatedphosphoprotein1434399_atGalnt6UDP-N-acetyl-alpha-AV2318660Mm.22969207839D-galactosamine: polypeptideN-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 61419153_at2810417H13RikRIKEN cDNAAK0176730Mm.269025680262810417H13 gene1426278_atIfi27interferon, alpha-AY0900980Mm.27127576933inducible protein 271432459_a_atMGI: 1891838repressor of GATAAK0158810Mm.116789582061451860_a_atTrim30tripartite motifAF220015P15533Mm.29557820128protein 301452393_atAI597013expressed sequenceBB0146260Mm.258930100182AI5970131452205_x_atTcrb-V13T-cell receptor beta,X671280Mm.333026269846variable 131420394_s_atGp49aglycoprotein 49 AU05264Q61450,Mm.35860114727,Q64281147281427656_atTcrb-V13T-cell receptor beta,X143880Mm.333026269846variable 131430165_atStk17bserine/threonineAI6619480Mm.2555998267kinase 17b(apoptosis-inducing)1450997_atStk17bserine/threonineAV1731390Mm.2555998267kinase 17b(apoptosis-inducing)1415899_atJunbJun-B oncogeneNM_008416P10922,Mm.116716477P094501449988_atGimap1GTPase, IMAPNM_008376P70224Mm.25259916205family member 11431292_a_atPtk91protein tyrosineAK0026990Mm.27434623999kinase 9-like (A6-related protein)1447621_s_at2610307O08RikRIKEN cDNAAV3007160Mm.45995725122610307O08 gene1434980_atPik3r5phosphoinositide-3-AV2306470Mm.244960320207kinase, regulatorysubunit 5, p1011424953_atBC021614cDNA sequenceBC0216140Mm.26996225884BC0216141435144_at0Transcribed locusBM2433790Mm.36409201433963_a_atBC032204cDNA sequenceBG0666640Mm.157591108101BC0322041419599_s_atMs4a11membrane-spanningNM_02683500643824-domains, subfamilyA, member 111422303_a_atTnfrsf18tumor necrosis factorAF229434O35714Mm.318021936receptor superfamily,member 181450678_atItgb2integrin beta 2NM_008404P11835Mm.1137164141427892_atMyoIgmyosin IGBB2353200Mm.2395542461771427511_atB2mBeta-2 microglobulinAA170322P01887Mm.163120101444177_at0Transcribed locus,AI4515380Mm.315560moderately similar toXP_576460.1PREDICTED: similarto hypotheticalproteinPB402898.00.0[Rattus norvegicus]1452539_a_atCd3zCD3 antigen, zetaX84237P29020,Mm.21730812503polypeptideP241611416882_atRgs10regulator of G-proteinNM_0264180Mm.1863567865signalling 101449361_atTbx21T-box 21NM_0195070Mm.94519577651417065_atEgr1early growth response 1NM_007913P08046Mm.181959136531425860_x_atCklfchemokine-like factorAY0465970Mm.269219754581419561_atCcl3chemokine (C—CNM_011337P10855Mm.128220302motif) ligand 31450753_atNkg7natural killer cellNM_0242530Mm.3461372310group 7 sequence1422875_atCd84CD84 antigenNM_0134890Mm.259115125231426817_atMki67antigen identified byX82786Q61769Mm.407817345monoclonal antibodyKi 671418655_atGalgt1UDP-N-acetyl-alpha-U18975Q09200Mm.185314421D-galactosamine: (N-acetylneuraminyl)-galactosylglucosylceramide-beta-1,4-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase1456439_x_atMical1microtubuleBB2094380Mm.290431171580associatedmonoxygenase,calponin and LIMdomain containing 11452348_s_atMndamyeloid cell nuclearAI48179700381308differentiationantigen1453228_atStx11syntaxin 11AK0178970Mm.248648747321449347_a_atXlr4X-linkedNM_0213650Mm.10476427083,lymphocyte-regulated 44347941416379_atPanx1pannexin 1NM_0194820Mm.142253559911416935_atTrpv2transient receptorNM_0117060Mm.28806422368potential cationchannel, subfamily V,member 21450069_a_atCugbp2CUG triplet repeat,BB6670960Mm.14709114007RNA binding protein 21458299_s_atNfkbienuclear factor ofBB820441O54910Mm.5704318037kappa lightpolypeptide geneenhancer in B-cellsinhibitor, epsilon1415945_atMcm5minichromosomeNM_008566P49718Mm.504817218maintenance deficient5, cell division cycle46 (S. cerevisiae)1426170_a_atCd8b1CD8 antigen, betaU34882P10300Mm.33314812526chain 11434388_atMobkl2aMOB1, Mps OneBB0238680Mm.49309208228Binder kinaseactivator-like 2A(yeast)1428786_atNckap1lNCK associatedBM2389060Mm.30805105855protein 1 like1429525_s_atMyo1fmyosin IFAK0211810Mm.42019179161419004_s_atBcl2a1aB-cellL16462Q07440,Mm.24491712044,leukemia/lymphomaO5517912045,2 related protein A1a120471421317_x_atMybmyeloblastosisNM_033597P06876,Mm.5210917863oncogeneQ61927,Q61421,Q61926,Q619281443894_atEvi2becotropic viralBB23621600216984integration site 2b1433699_atTnfaip3tumor necrosis factor,BM241351Q60769Mm.11668321929alpha-induced protein 31452389_atTnfrsf7tumor necrosis factorL24495P41272Mm.12121940receptor superfamily,member 71418398_a_atPhemxpan hematopoieticAF1757710Mm.2817227027expression1419186_a_atSt8sia4ST8 alpha-N-acetyl-NM_009183Q64692Mm.30622820452neuraminide alpha-2,8-sialyltransferase 41438676_atMpa2lmacrophageBM2414850Mm.275893100702activation 2 like1423182_at00AK0046680001421628_atIl18r1interleukin 18NM_008365Q61098Mm.25366416182receptor 11424906_atE030024M05RikRIKEN cDNABC0252200Mm.5675217430E030024M05 gene1418612_atSlfn1schlafen 1NM_0114070Mm.10948205551418776_at5830443L24RikRIKEN cDNANM_0295090Mm.301868760745830443L24 gene1439440_x_atPtk9lprotein tyrosineBB3976720Mm.27434623999kinase 9-like (A6-related protein)1434068_s_atAI662270expressed sequenceBE6884100Mm.295569103814AI6622701435458_at00AI3235500001453281_atPik3cdPhosphatidylinositolBB700084O35904Mm.229108187073-kinase catalyticdelta polypeptide1435710_atAI661384expressed sequenceBB0340380Mm.30743106930AI6613841451673_atCd8aCD8 antigen, alphaM12825P01731,Mm.185812525chainQ609651452815_atP2ry10purinergic receptorAK0200010Mm.7463978826P2Y, G-proteincoupled 101416811_s_atCtla2acytotoxic TNM_007796P12399,Mm.35858413024,lymphocyte-P1240013025associated protein 2alpha1436329_atEgr3early growth response 3AV346607P43300Mm.103737136551416875_atParvgparvin, gammaNM_0223210Mm.251356640991423467_atMs4a4bmembrane-spanningBB1990010Mm.33957603614-domains, subfamilyA, member 4B1444078_atCd8aCD8 antigen, alphaBB154331P01731,Mm.185812525chainQ609651436808_x_atMcm5minichromosomeAI324988P49718Mm.504817218maintenance deficient5, cell division cycle46 (S. cerevisiae)1416802_a_atCdca5cell division cycleNM_0264100Mm.2352667849associated 51426239_s_at00BC0166420001416028_a_atHn1hematological andNM_008258P97825Mm.177515374neurologicalexpressed sequence 11429524_atMyo1fmyosin IFAK0211810Mm.42019179161419254_atMthfd2methylenetetrahydrofolateBG076333P18155Mm.44317768dehydrogenase(NAD+ dependent),methenyltetrahydrofolatecyclohydrolase1441317_x_atMGI: 1923321gamma-aminobutyricBB3160600Mm.22881276071acid (GABA-B)receptor bindingprotein1438917_x_atNup62nucleoporin 62AW240611Q63850Mm.2565182261429319_atRhohras homolog geneBM2436600Mm.35876374734family, member H1437636_atLOC433377similar to Interferon-BB13560200433377activatable protein203 (Ifi-203)(Interferon-inducibleprotein p203)1435330_atAI447904expressed sequenceBM2410080Mm.360525236312,AI4479045453841416698_a_atCks1bCDC28 proteinNM_016904P61025Mm.304954124kinase 1b1460651_atLatlinker for activationAF036907O54957Mm.1028016797of T cells1433964_s_atBC032204cDNA sequenceBG0666640Mm.157591108101BC0322041434295_atRasgrp1RAS guanyl releasingBE6913560Mm.4215019419protein 11437325_x_atAldh18a1aldehydeBB251523Q63739Mm.23311756454dehydrogenase 18family, member A11426772_x_atTcrb-JT-cell receptor beta,M114560Mm.33302621580,joining region269846,3817651451363_a_at2010308M01RikRIKEN cDNABC0082660Mm.371646721212010308M01 gene1439814_at0Transcribed locusBM2466300Mm.31527101448575_atIl7rinterleukin 7 receptorAI573431P16872Mm.389161971422188_s_atTcrgT-cell receptorNM_0115580Mm.350873110067,gamma chain4345311437760_atGalnt12UDP-N-acetyl-alpha-AV3761370Mm.132246230145D-galactosamine: polypeptideN-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase121428492_atGlipr2GLI pathogenesis-BM2082140Mm.22213384009related 21460437_atPscd4pleckstrin homology,AK0109080Mm.3291172318Sec7 and coiled/coildomains 41437052_s_atSlc2a3solute carrier familyBB414515P32037,Mm.269857205272 (facilitated glucoseQ61607transporter), member 31422638_s_atRassf5Ras associationNM_018750O70407Mm.24829154354(RalGDS/AF-6)domain family 51418826_atMs4a6bmembrane-spanningNM_0272090Mm.278844697744-domains, subfamilyA, member 6B1422828_atCd3dCD3 antigen, deltaNM_0134870Mm.452712500polypeptide1452948_atTnfaip8l2tumor necrosis factor,AK0075400Mm.3436869769alpha-induced protein8-like 21422932_a_atVav1vav 1 oncogeneNM_011691P27870,Mm.24817222324O085261436312_atZfpn1a1zinc finger protein,AV317621Q03267Mm.10354522778subfamily 1A, 1(Ikaros)1418451_atGng2guanine nucleotideBB522409P63213Mm.4173714702binding protein (Gprotein), gamma 2subunit1418166_atI112rb1interleukin 12NM_008353Q60837Mm.73116161receptor, beta 11448749_atPlekpleckstrinAF1818290Mm.98232561931452483_a_atCd44CD44 antigenX66083P15379Mm.330428125051448617_atCd53CD53 antigenNM_007651Q61451Mm.316861125081425832_a_atCxcr6chemokine (C—X—CAF3010180Mm.12428980901motif) receptor 61421855_atFgl2fibrinogen-likeBF136544P12804Mm.29210014190protein 21419202_atCst7cystatin FNM_009977O89098Mm.1296513011(leukocystatin)1423602_atTraf1Tnf receptor-BG064103P39428Mm.23951422029associated factor 11450905_atPlxnc1plexin C1BB4767070Mm.256712547121439141_atGpr18G protein-coupledBG1455500Mm.37405110168receptor 181426324_atH2-D1histocompatibility 2,M33151P01899,Mm.3326314964D region locus 1P01900,P01897,P01895,Q31116,Q31198,Q31168,O19467,O78207,Q31167,Q31209,Q31149,Q31169,Q31170,Q31188,Q61891,Q618921425086_a_atSlamf6SLAM familyAF2486360Mm.24572730925member 61420671_x_atMs4a4cmembrane-spanningNM_0294990Mm.353643643804-domains, subfamilyA, member 4C1422628_at4632417K18RikRIKEN cDNANM_0266400Mm.16431073734632417K18 gene1417164_atDusp10dual specificityNM_0220190Mm.26619163953phosphatase 101452796_atDef6differentiallyAK0103560Mm.20473123853expressed in FDCP 61419631_atWasWiskott-AldrichNM_009515P70315,Mm.473522376syndrome homologQ61078(human)1421457_a_atSamsn1SAM domain, SH3NM_023380P57725Mm.13140667742domain and nuclearlocalisation signals, 1


Other Embodiments

It is to be understood that while the invention has been described in conjunction with the detailed description thereof, the foregoing description is intended to illustrate and not limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the scope of the appended claims. Other aspects, advantages, and modifications are within the scope of the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for detecting tissue rejection, wherein said method comprises determining whether or not tissue transplanted into a mammal contains cells that express at least two of the nucleic acids listed in Table 4 or Table 5, wherein the presence of said cells indicates that said tissue is being rejected.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein said mammal is a human.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein said tissue is kidney tissue.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein said tissue is a kidney.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein said method comprises determining whether or not said tissue contains cells that express at least five of said nucleic acids.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein said method comprises determining whether or not said tissue contains cells that express at least ten of said nucleic acids.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein said method comprises determining whether or not said tissue contains cells that express at least twenty of said nucleic acids.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein said determining step comprises measuring the level of mRNA expressed from said at least two nucleic acids.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein said determining step comprises measuring the level of polypeptide expressed from said at least two nucleic acids.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein said method comprises determining whether or not said tissue contains cells that express at least two of said nucleic acids at a level greater than the average level of expression exhibited in cells from control tissue that has not been transplanted.
  • 11. A method for detecting tissue rejection, wherein said method comprises determining whether or not a sample contains cells that express at least two of the nucleic acids listed in Table 4 or Table 5, wherein said sample comprises cells, was obtained from tissue that was transplanted into a mammal, and was obtained from said tissue within fifteen days of said tissue being transplanted into said mammal, and wherein the presence of said cells indicates that said tissue is being rejected.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein said mammal is a human.
  • 13. The method of claim 11, wherein said tissue is kidney tissue.
  • 14. The method of claim 11, wherein said tissue is a kidney.
  • 15. The method of claim 11, wherein said method comprises determining whether or not said sample contains cells that express at least five of said nucleic acids.
  • 16. The method of claim 11, wherein said method comprises determining whether or not said sample contains cells that express at least ten of said nucleic acids.
  • 17. The method of claim 11, wherein said method comprises determining whether or not said sample contains cells that express at least twenty of said nucleic acids.
  • 18. The method of claim 11, wherein said determining step comprises measuring the level of mRNA expressed from said at least two nucleic acids.
  • 19. The method of claim 11, wherein said determining step comprises measuring the level of polypeptide expressed from said at least two nucleic acids.
  • 20. The method of claim 11, wherein said sample was obtained from said tissue within ten days of said tissue being transplanted into said mammal.
  • 21. The method of claim 11, wherein said sample was obtained from said tissue within five days of said tissue being transplanted into said mammal.
  • 22. The method of claim 11, wherein said method comprises determining whether or not said sample contains cells that express at least two of said nucleic acids at a level greater than the average level of expression exhibited in cells from control tissue that has not been transplanted.
  • 23. A nucleic acid array comprising at least 20 nucleic acid molecules, wherein each of said at least 20 nucleic acid molecules has a different nucleic acid sequence, and wherein at least 50 percent of the nucleic acid molecules of said array comprise a sequence from nucleic acid selected from the group consisting of the nucleic acids listed in Table 4 and Table 5.
  • 24. The array of claim 23, wherein said array comprises at least 50 nucleic acid molecules, wherein each of said at least 50 nucleic acid molecules has a different nucleic acid sequence.
  • 25. The array of claim 23, wherein said array comprises at least 100 nucleic acid molecules, wherein each of said at least 100 nucleic acid molecules has a different nucleic acid sequence.
  • 26. The array of claim 23, wherein each of said nucleic acid molecules that comprise a sequence from nucleic acid selected from said group comprises no more than three mismatches.
  • 27. The array of claim 23, wherein at least 75 percent of the nucleic acid molecules of said array comprise a sequence from nucleic acid selected from said group.
  • 28. The array of claim 23, wherein at least 95 percent of the nucleic acid molecules of said array comprise a sequence from nucleic acid selected from said group.
  • 29. The array of claim 23, wherein said array comprises glass.
  • 30. The array of claim 23, wherein said at least 20 nucleic acid molecules comprise a sequence present in a human.
  • 31. A computer-readable storage medium having instructions stored thereon for causing a programmable processor to determine whether one or more nucleic acids listed in Table 4 or Table 5 are detected in a sample, wherein said sample is from a transplanted tissue.
  • 32. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 31, further comprising instructions stored thereon for causing a programmable processor to determine whether one or more of the nucleic acids listed in Table 4 or Table 5 is expressed at a greater level in said sample than in a control sample of non-transplanted tissue.
  • 33. An apparatus for determining whether a transplanted tissue is being rejected, said apparatus comprising: one or more collectors for obtaining signals representative of the presence of one or more nucleic acids listed in Table 4 or Table 5 in a sample from said transplanted tissue; and a processor for analyzing said signals and determining whether said tissue is being rejected.
  • 34. The apparatus of claim 33, wherein said one or more collectors are configured to obtain further signals representative of the presence of said one or more nucleic acids in a control sample from non-transplanted tissue.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application Serial No. 60/681,340, filed May 16, 2005.

Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60681340 May 2005 US