This invention relates to a tissue resecting system.
Endoscopic surgery of a distensible organ, such as a uterus, may be performed with an endoscope that is insertable into the uterus and a resector that passes through the endoscope to cut or otherwise treat tissue in the uterus. During surgery, it often is desirable to distend the uterus with a fluid, such as saline, sorbitol, or glycine, in order provide a visible working space. Fluid can be infused into the uterus and removed from the uterus through the endoscope and/or resector.
If the outflow of fluid from the uterus is greater than the inflow of fluid to the uterus, the uterus may collapse back to its normal state, making visualization of the uterus difficult. On the other hand, if the inflow of fluid is greater than the outflow of fluid such that the pressure created by the fluid is greater than the patient's mean arterial pressure, excess fluid can enter the patient's vascular system (known as intravasation), which can lead to serious complications or death.
To aid in addressing these issues, in an aspect of the invention, a surgical system includes a first instrument defining a fluid flow channel and a second instrument receivable by the first instrument fluid flow channel. The second instrument defines a channel. The system includes a valve coupled to the first instrument and configured to control fluid flow through the first instrument channel. The valve is configured such that impedance of fluid flow through the first instrument channel is substantially the same without the second instrument received in the first instrument channel and with the first instrument channel partially blocked by the second instrument such that the first instrument channel is limited to a region between the first and second instruments.
Embodiments of this aspect of the invention may include one or more of the following features.
For example, the first instrument includes an outer member and an inner member. The inner member defines the first instrument channel therethrough. The inner member is received within the outer member, and the outer member and the inner member define a second fluid flow channel therebetween. The second instrument includes a tube defining the second instrument channel therethrough. The tube partially blocks the first instrument fluid flow channel when received therein. The second fluid flow channel has a cross-sectional area of, e.g., about 0.0083 to about 0.0249 square inches, preferably about 0.0166 square inches. The first instrument fluid flow channel has a cross-sectional area of, e.g., about 0.0053 to about 0.0159 square inches, preferably about 0.0106 square inches. The second instrument channel has a cross-sectional area of, e.g., about 0.0042 to about 0.013 square inches, preferably about 0.0085 square inches.
In an illustrated embodiment, the valve includes a housing and a body within the housing. The body defines an opening therein and is moveable relative to the housing between a first position in which the opening and the first instrument channel define a first fluid flow path having a first impedance and a second position in which the opening is arranged to receive the second instrument therethrough such that the opening and the first instrument channel define a second fluid flow path that has a second impedance substantially equal to the first impedance.
The system as illustrated includes a pump and the first instrument is configured to connect to the pump such that the pump infuses fluid through the first instrument channel. The pump is programmed to infuse fluid through the first instrument channel to maintain a substantially constant pressure of between about 60 mm Hg and about 120 mm Hg inside a distensible organ. A sensor coupled to the pump senses a flow impedance at a given flow rate, and a controller coupled to the sensor and the pump compares the flow impedance to a predetermined flow impedance for the given flow rate to verify the identity of the first and second instruments.
The second instrument channel is in fluid communication with a source of suction and a regulator is interposed between the second instrument channel and the source of suction to regulate an amount of suction applied through the second instrument channel.
According to another aspect of the invention, a surgical system includes a first instrument defining a fluid flow channel, and a second instrument receivable by the first instrument fluid flow channel. The second instrument defines a channel. The system includes a means for maintaining a substantially constant impedance of fluid flow through the first instrument channel with and without the second instrument received in the first instrument channel.
According to another aspect of the invention, a method includes: (a) positioning a valve coupled to a first instrument in a first position; (b) introducing fluid to a distensible organ through the valve with the valve in the first position and through a channel in the first instrument; (c) positioning the valve in a second position; (d) introducing a second instrument through the valve with the valve in the second position and through the first instrument channel; and (e) introducing fluid to the distensible organ through the valve with the valve in the second position and through a region of the first instrument channel located between the first and second instruments. The impedance of fluid flow in steps (b) and (e) is substantially the same.
Embodiments of this aspect may include one or more of the following features. The method includes maintaining substantially constant fluid pressure within the distensible organ with and without the second instrument received in the first instrument channel. Maintaining includes suctioning fluid from the distensible organ through the second instrument. The method includes regulating a pump coupled to the valve for introducing fluid through the valve.
According to another aspect of the invention, a valve includes a housing and a body within the housing. The body defines an opening therein. The body is moveable relative to the housing between a first position in which the opening and the housing define a first fluid flow path having a first impedance and a second position in which the opening is arranged to receive a surgical instrument therein. The opening is configured such that with the surgical instrument received therein, the opening and the housing define a second fluid flow path that has a second impedance substantially equal to the first impedance.
Embodiments of this aspect may include one or more of the following features. The opening includes a throughbore through the body for receiving the surgical instrument. The opening includes a second bore having a first open end and a second closed end in the body. The second bore is arranged substantially orthogonal to the throughbore and intersects the throughbore. The housing defines an inlet and an outlet. When the body is in the first position, the throughbore is partially aligned with the inlet and the first fluid flow path is from the inlet, through the throughbore, and then through the second bore to the outlet. When the body is in the second position, the second bore is aligned with the inlet and the second fluid flow path is from the inlet, through the second bore, and then through the throughbore to the outlet.
According to another aspect of the invention, a method of regulating inflow through a valve includes positioning the valve in a first position wherein the valve has a first impedance; positioning the valve in a second position; and introducing a surgical instrument through the valve in the second position. A combination of the surgical instrument and the valve has a second impedance substantially equal to the first impedance.
According to another aspect of the invention, an apparatus for surgery includes an outer member and an inner member received within the outer member. The outer member and the inner member define a first channel therebetween. The inner member houses an optical lens and defines a second channel for receiving a surgical instrument. The first and second channels are configured such that a pump having an inflow rate of up to about 0.7 L/min connected to the second channel can maintain fluid pressure inside an organ.
Embodiments of this aspect may include one or more of the following features. A pump is coupled to the second channel to introduce fluid through the second channel at an inflow rate up to about 0.7 L/min. The outer member defines a plurality of holes in fluid communication with the first channel. The plurality of holes is positioned in a distal portion of the outer member. The second channel has a D-shaped cross-section. The first channel has a cross-sectional area, e.g., of about 0.0083 to about 0.0249 square inches, preferably about 0.0166 square inches. The second channel has a cross-sectional area of, e.g., about 0.0053 to about 0.0159 square inches, preferably about 0.0106 square inches. The second channel receives the surgical instrument. The surgical instrument has a suction channel with a cross-sectional area of, e.g., about 0.0042 to about 0.013 square inches, preferably about 0.0085 square inches. A valve is coupled to the inner member for regulating inflow through the second channel such that the valve and the second channel have a first impedance equal to a second impedance when the surgical instrument is received in the second channel.
According to another aspect of the invention, a fluid management system includes a pump configured for coupling to an endoscope to infuse fluid through the endoscope at a given flow rate. A sensor is coupled to the pump that senses a flow impedance through the endoscope at the given flow rate. A controller is coupled to the sensor and programmed to compare the flow impedance to a predetermined flow impedance for the given flow rate to verify the identity of the endoscope and a surgical instrument received therein.
Embodiments of this aspect may include one or more of the following features. The sensor includes a pressure transducer. A circuit is coupled to the controller and the pump for disabling the pump if the identity of the surgical instrument and endoscope is not verified. The controller is programmed to compare flow impedances to predetermined flow impedances at multiple flow rates.
According to another aspect of the invention, a fluid management system includes means for infusing fluid through an endoscope at a flow rate, means for measuring a flow impedance through the endoscope at the flow rate, and means for comparing the flow impedance to a predetermined flow impedance to verify the identity of the endoscope and a surgical instrument received therein.
According to another aspect of the invention, a method includes programming a pump with data on a predetermined flow impedance for an endoscope and surgical instrument assembly for a given flow rate, activating the pump to infuse fluid through the endoscope and surgical instrument assembly at the given flow rate, sensing a flow impedance through the assembly, and comparing the sensed flow impedance to the predetermined flow impedance. The method may further include disabling the pump if the flow impedance is not within a threshold value of the predetermined flow impedance.
According to another aspect of the invention, a method includes infusing fluid into a distensible organ, and maintaining a substantially constant fluid pressure inside the distensible organ between about 60 mm Hg and about 120 mm Hg.
According to another aspect of the invention, a system includes an endoscope defining a channel therethrough and a surgical instrument received within the endoscope channel. The surgical instrument defines a channel therein for connection with a source of suction. A regulator is coupled to the surgical instrument channel between the instrument channel and the source of suction to regulate an amount of suction applied through the instrument channel.
The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Referring to
System 10 further includes a resector 200 that is received within hysteroscope 100 during use to resect tissue from the organ. Resector 200 includes a handle 205 and a distal portion 210 that extends out of distal portion 102 of hysteroscope 100. Distal portion 210 includes a working end 220, e.g., a morcellator, that can be actuated to cut tissue from the organ. Handle 205 includes a motor (not shown) coupled to working end 220 to rotate working end 220 about a longitudinal axis to cut tissue. Also located on cart 15 is a resector control unit 60 of system 10 connected by a wire 201 to resector 200 to control movement of working end 220. System 10 also includes a footpedal 62 connected to control unit 60 by a wire 64 to actuate control unit 60.
Also located on cart 15 are four vacuum containers 42 of system 10 connected by suction line 34 to a suction port 230 on resector 200 to collect fluid and tissue suctioned through resector 200. At least one of vacuum containers 42 includes a tissue trap 43 that collects tissue suctioned through suction lines 34 for later examination, e.g., by a pathologist. System 10 also includes a vacuum regulator 400 connected by a suction line 36 to vacuum containers 42 and by vacuum line 38 to a vacuum source (not shown) to regulate suction provided by the vacuum source through suction channel 204 of resector 200.
Also located on cart 15 is a fluid monitoring unit 18 of system 10 that tracks the amount of fluid collected in gravity container 40 and vacuum containers 42 and the amount of fluid pumped by fluid management control unit 300 and sets off an audible or visual alarm if the difference between the amounts of fluid pumped and collected is above a threshold value, thus minimizing the possibility of excess fluid intravasation.
Part of system 10 is a visualizing and imaging assembly 50 that includes a camera 51 coupled to a camera port 106 of hysteroscope 100, and a light source 52 coupled by a fiber optic cable 54 to a light port 109 of hysteroscope 100. Together, camera 50 and light source 52 allow a user to remotely visualize the tissue at distal end 102 of hysteroscope 100. Assembly 50 also includes an imaging station 70 connected by a fiber optic cable 56 to camera 50. Imaging station 70 has monitors 72 for viewing images from camera 50 and a capture system 74 for making a recording of the images.
Referring to
Hysteroscope 100 also includes a scope housing 90 that has an elongated member 124 removably receivable in tube 120. Member 124 has an outer wall 126 and an inner wall 125. Inner wall 125 that defines an inflow channel 130. A proximal portion 94 of scope housing 90 includes inflow port 110, a primary valve 150, and a secondary valve 160, which are fluidly connected to inflow channel 130, as described below. Member 124 also defines a lens channel 140 that houses an optical lens 142. Scope housing 90 has a proximal portion 94 that includes camera port 106 and light port 109, which are coupled to optical lens 142 by fiber optic lines (not shown). Light travels from light port 109 to distal end 102 of hysteroscope 100 to illuminate objects near distal end 102. Images of those objects are received by optical lens 142, and travel through camera port 106 to camera (
Referring also to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The ability of fluid management control unit 300 to maintain a substantially constant fluid pressure in the organ is further facilitated by secondary valve 160 of scope housing 90, which maintains substantially the same fluid flow impedance through inflow channel 130 regardless of whether resector 200 is positioned in scope housing 90. For example,
Referring to
Body 164 is attached to a handle 165 that allows body 164 to be moveable between a first position (
Referring to
Referring also to
Fluid management control unit 300 maintains a substantially constant fluid pressure inside the organ by pumping sufficient fluid into the organ through inflow channel 130 to balance fluid flow out of the organ through passive outflow channel 128 and from suction of fluid through suction channel 204 (when resector 200 is received in hysteroscope 100). Referring to
Fluid management control unit 300 includes a flow rate sensor 315, such as a roller head, a turbine, or an ultrasonic sensor, that measures the flow rate of fluid outputted by pump 310. Control unit 300 also includes a pressure sensor, e.g., pressure transducer 320, that senses the fluid pressure in fluid line 30 after the fluid passes through pump 310. Fluid management control unit 300 also includes an input 345 where a user can input a desired pressure to be maintained inside the organ, and a memory 340 that contains information on the impedance (i.e., pressure drop) through the hysteroscope 100 and resector 200 combination at a range of different flow rates.
Coupled to pressure sensor 320, pump 310, flow rate sensor 315, input 345, and memory 340, is a controller 330, e.g., a microprocessor, that controls the pressure and the flow rate outputted by pump 310 based on the flow rate measured by flow rate sensor 315, the pressure measured by pressure sensor 320, the information stored in memory 340, and the target pressure 345. Based on a measured flow rate and a measured pressure, controller 330 determines the actual pressure in the organ according to the information stored in memory 340 that accounts for the impedance (i.e., pressure drop) through the hysteroscope 100 at various flow rates. Controller 330 then compares the pressure in the organ with the target pressure and adjusts the pressure and flow rate outputted by pump 310 accordingly. If the target pressure is greater than the actual pressure, then controller 330 increases the output of pump 310. If the target pressure is less than the actual pressure, then controller 330 decreases the output of pump 310.
The size and configuration of inflow channel 130, passive outflow channel 128, and suction channel 204 facilitate controller 330 maintaining substantially constant pressure in the organ. In addition, secondary valve 160 facilitates maintaining a substantially constant pressure in the organ by keeping the impedance through hysteroscope 100 the same regardless of whether resector 200 is received in hysteroscope 100. Thus, it is not necessary for controller 330 to “know” whether resector 200 is positioned in hysteroscope 100. Fluid management control unit 300 is able to maintain a relatively constant pressure of fluid within the organ, e.g., at a preset pressure between about 60 mm Hg and about 120 mm Hg.
Fluid management control unit 300 also includes a feature that verifies that a correct combination of hysteroscope 100 and resector 200 is being used (i.e., to ensure that the system is only used when a resector and a hysteroscope having properly balanced flow channels are attached to fluid management control unit 300). Memory 340 contains flow rate and impedance information for each valid combination of a hysteroscope and a resector. Controller 330 is programmed to determine whether the pressure measured by pressure transducer 320 is within a threshold value of a predetermined pressure for a given flow rate in order to verify the identity of the combination of the hysteroscope and the resector. Controller 330 is coupled to a shut-off circuit 360 to disable pump 310 when controller 330 determines that the combination of hysteroscope and resector is invalid (e.g., when an incorrect size resector is used with the hysteroscope). If the combination is verified, then controller 330 overrides shut-off circuit 360 and allows pump 310 to pump fluid to hysteroscope 100, as described above. On the other hand, if controller 330 determines that the combination of the hysteroscope and the resector is invalid (e.g., wrong size resector), the controller 330 activates shut-off circuit 360 to disable pump 310. Controller 330 also is coupled to an alarm 350, e.g., a visual or audible alarm, that is activated when pump 310 is disabled. Controller 330 is programmed to make pressure comparisons at several (e.g., three or four) flow rates prior to use of hysteroscope 100 and resector 200.
In use, a user assembles the components of resection system 10 as shown in
Referring to
Referring to
Once uterus 900 has been distended, with primary valve 150 still open, the user positions secondary valve 160 in the second position, as shown in
The user visualizes the inside of uterus 900 on monitors 62 of visualizing and imaging assembly 50. The user actuates foot pedal 62, which activates resector control unit 60. Resector control unit 60 activates resector 200, e.g., by rotating a cutting blade 910 at working end 220 of resector 200, to cut tissue from uterus 900. Fluid and tissue cut by blade 910 are suctioned through channel 204 of resector 200 along path D. During the procedure, resector 200 can be removed from hysteroscope 100 while hysteroscope 100 remains inside uterus 900, e.g., to clean resector 200 or change instruments, so long as the user moves secondary valve 160 to the closed position, as shown in
During the procedure fluid monitor unit 18 tracks the amount of fluid infused through resector 200 and the amount of fluid collected in gravity container 40 and vacuum containers 42. Fluid monitor unit 18 sets off an audible or a visual alarm if substantially more fluid is infused than collected, which indicates that the patient is absorbing too much fluid. Once the procedure is complete, the user closes primary valve 150, as shown in
A number of embodiments of the invention have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, the shape, size, and configuration of the fluid flow channels through the hysteroscope and the resector could be different than that shown and described, such as having an inflow channel with an elliptical, square, triangular, or trapezoidal cross-section. Instead of a blind bore, the body of the secondary valve could include a peripheral channel formed in an outer surface of the body. Instead of a secondary valve, the primary valve could be electronically controlled to maintain a constant impedance through the hysteroscope regardless of whether the resector is inserted through the hysteroscope. The hysteroscope can be used with other types of resector tools having rotatable working ends, such as burrs or drills. The hysteroscope also can be used with a resector tool having a reciprocating working end, such as the instrument disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/318,400 entitled “Reciprocating rotary arthroscopic surgical instrument,” the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference. The fluid management system can include another type of pump, such as a centrifugal, piston, or diaphragm pump. The vacuum regulator could include a manually or electronically operable valve, a flow sensor, and/or a pressure gauge. The devices shown can be used for surgery on other distensible organs, such as a shoulder or knee joint. Different combinations of the components of the system could be used or components could be added or deleted. These and other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
This application is a continuation of prior application Ser. No. 14/811,331, filed Jul. 28, 2015, which is a division of prior application Ser. No. 14/473,389, filed Aug. 29, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,125,550, which is a continuation of prior application Ser. No. 13/860,654, filed Apr. 11, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,852,085, which is a continuation of prior application Ser. No. 13/212,240, filed Aug. 18, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,419,626, which is a continuation of prior application Ser. No. 10/927,244, filed Aug. 27, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,062,214, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1585934 | Muir | May 1926 | A |
1666332 | Hirsch | Apr 1928 | A |
1831786 | Duncan | Nov 1931 | A |
2708437 | Hutchins | May 1955 | A |
3297022 | Wallace | Jan 1967 | A |
3686706 | Finley | Aug 1972 | A |
3734099 | Bender | May 1973 | A |
3791379 | Storz | Feb 1974 | A |
3812855 | Banko | May 1974 | A |
3835842 | Iglesias | Sep 1974 | A |
3850162 | Iglesias | Nov 1974 | A |
3945375 | Banko | Mar 1976 | A |
3980252 | Tae | Sep 1976 | A |
3995619 | Glatzer | Dec 1976 | A |
3996921 | Neuwirth | Dec 1976 | A |
4011869 | Seiler, Jr. | Mar 1977 | A |
4108182 | Hartman | Aug 1978 | A |
4146405 | Timmer | Mar 1979 | A |
4198958 | Utsugi | Apr 1980 | A |
4203444 | Bonnell | May 1980 | A |
4210146 | Banko | Jul 1980 | A |
4246902 | Martinez | Jan 1981 | A |
4247180 | Norris | Jan 1981 | A |
4258721 | Parent | Mar 1981 | A |
4261346 | Wettermann | Apr 1981 | A |
4294234 | Matsuo | Oct 1981 | A |
4316465 | Dotson, Jr. | Feb 1982 | A |
4369768 | Vukovic | Jan 1983 | A |
4392485 | Hiltebrandt | Jul 1983 | A |
4414962 | Carson | Nov 1983 | A |
4449538 | Corbitt | May 1984 | A |
4493698 | Wang | Jan 1985 | A |
4517977 | Frost | May 1985 | A |
4543965 | Pack | Oct 1985 | A |
4567880 | Goodman | Feb 1986 | A |
4589414 | Yoshida | May 1986 | A |
4601284 | Arakawa | Jul 1986 | A |
4601290 | Effron | Jul 1986 | A |
4606330 | Bonnet | Aug 1986 | A |
4630598 | Bonnet | Dec 1986 | A |
4644952 | Patipa | Feb 1987 | A |
4649919 | Thimsen | Mar 1987 | A |
4700694 | Shishido | Oct 1987 | A |
4706656 | Kuboto | Nov 1987 | A |
4718291 | Wood | Jan 1988 | A |
4737142 | Heckele | Apr 1988 | A |
4749376 | Kensey | Jun 1988 | A |
4756309 | Sachse | Jul 1988 | A |
4819635 | Shapiro | Apr 1989 | A |
4844064 | Thimsen | Jul 1989 | A |
4850354 | McGurk-Burleson | Jul 1989 | A |
4856919 | Takeuchi | Aug 1989 | A |
4867157 | McGurk-Burleson | Sep 1989 | A |
4924851 | Ognier | May 1990 | A |
4940061 | Terwilliger | Jul 1990 | A |
4950278 | Sachse | Aug 1990 | A |
4955882 | Hakky | Sep 1990 | A |
4971034 | Doi | Nov 1990 | A |
4986827 | Akkas | Jan 1991 | A |
4998527 | Meyer | Mar 1991 | A |
4998914 | Wiest | Mar 1991 | A |
5007917 | Evans | Apr 1991 | A |
5027792 | Meyer | Jul 1991 | A |
5037386 | Marcus | Aug 1991 | A |
5105800 | Takahashi | Apr 1992 | A |
5106364 | Hayafuji | Apr 1992 | A |
5112299 | Pascaloff | May 1992 | A |
5116868 | Chen | May 1992 | A |
5125910 | Freitas | Jun 1992 | A |
5133713 | Huang | Jul 1992 | A |
5152744 | Krause | Oct 1992 | A |
5158553 | Berry | Oct 1992 | A |
5163433 | Kagawa | Nov 1992 | A |
5169397 | Sakashita | Dec 1992 | A |
5176677 | Wuchinich | Jan 1993 | A |
5195541 | Obenchain | Mar 1993 | A |
5226910 | Kajiyama | Jul 1993 | A |
5244459 | Hill | Sep 1993 | A |
5254117 | Rigby | Oct 1993 | A |
5269785 | Bonutti | Dec 1993 | A |
5270622 | Krause | Dec 1993 | A |
5275609 | Pingleton | Jan 1994 | A |
5288290 | Brody | Feb 1994 | A |
5304118 | Trese | Apr 1994 | A |
5312399 | Hakky | May 1994 | A |
5312425 | Evans | May 1994 | A |
5312430 | Rosenbluth | May 1994 | A |
5320091 | Grossi | Jun 1994 | A |
5347992 | Pearlman | Sep 1994 | A |
5350390 | Sher | Sep 1994 | A |
5364395 | West, Jr. | Nov 1994 | A |
5374253 | Burns, Sr. | Dec 1994 | A |
5390585 | Ryuh | Feb 1995 | A |
5392765 | Muller | Feb 1995 | A |
5395313 | Naves | Mar 1995 | A |
5403276 | Schechter | Apr 1995 | A |
5409013 | Clement | Apr 1995 | A |
5409453 | Lundquist | Apr 1995 | A |
5411513 | Ireland | May 1995 | A |
5421819 | Edwards | Jun 1995 | A |
5425376 | Banys | Jun 1995 | A |
5429601 | Conley | Jul 1995 | A |
5435805 | Edwards | Jul 1995 | A |
5443476 | Shapiro | Aug 1995 | A |
5449356 | Walbrink | Sep 1995 | A |
5456673 | Ziegler | Oct 1995 | A |
5456689 | Kresch | Oct 1995 | A |
5483951 | Frassica | Jan 1996 | A |
5490819 | Nicholas | Feb 1996 | A |
5490860 | Middle | Feb 1996 | A |
5492537 | Vancaillie | Feb 1996 | A |
5498258 | Hakky | Mar 1996 | A |
5527331 | Kresch | Jun 1996 | A |
5549541 | Muller | Aug 1996 | A |
5556378 | Storz | Sep 1996 | A |
5563481 | Krause | Oct 1996 | A |
5569164 | Lurz | Oct 1996 | A |
5569254 | Carlson | Oct 1996 | A |
5569284 | Young | Oct 1996 | A |
5575756 | Karasawa | Nov 1996 | A |
5586973 | Lemaire | Dec 1996 | A |
5591187 | Dekel | Jan 1997 | A |
5601583 | Donahue | Feb 1997 | A |
5601603 | Illi | Feb 1997 | A |
5602449 | Krause | Feb 1997 | A |
5603332 | O'Connor | Feb 1997 | A |
5630798 | Beiser | May 1997 | A |
5649547 | Ritchart | Jul 1997 | A |
5669927 | Boebel | Sep 1997 | A |
5672945 | Krause | Sep 1997 | A |
5674179 | Bonnet | Oct 1997 | A |
5676497 | Kim | Oct 1997 | A |
5695448 | Kimura | Dec 1997 | A |
5702420 | Sterling | Dec 1997 | A |
5709698 | Adams | Jan 1998 | A |
5730752 | Alden | Mar 1998 | A |
5733298 | Berman | Mar 1998 | A |
5741286 | Recuset | Apr 1998 | A |
5741287 | Alden | Apr 1998 | A |
5749885 | Sjostrom | May 1998 | A |
5749889 | Bacich | May 1998 | A |
5759185 | Grinberg | Jun 1998 | A |
5772634 | Atkinson | Jun 1998 | A |
5775333 | Burbank | Jul 1998 | A |
5782849 | Miller | Jul 1998 | A |
5807240 | Muller | Sep 1998 | A |
5807282 | Fowler | Sep 1998 | A |
5810770 | Chin | Sep 1998 | A |
5810861 | Gaber | Sep 1998 | A |
5814009 | Wheatman | Sep 1998 | A |
5833643 | Ross | Nov 1998 | A |
5840060 | Beiser | Nov 1998 | A |
5857995 | Thomas | Jan 1999 | A |
5873886 | Larsen | Feb 1999 | A |
5899915 | Saadat | May 1999 | A |
5911699 | Anis | Jun 1999 | A |
5911722 | Adler | Jun 1999 | A |
5913867 | Dion | Jun 1999 | A |
5916229 | Evans | Jun 1999 | A |
5925055 | Adrian | Jul 1999 | A |
5928163 | Roberts | Jul 1999 | A |
5944668 | Vancaillie | Aug 1999 | A |
5947990 | Smith | Sep 1999 | A |
5951490 | Fowler | Sep 1999 | A |
5956130 | Vancaillie | Sep 1999 | A |
5957832 | Taylor | Sep 1999 | A |
6001116 | Heisler | Dec 1999 | A |
6004320 | Casscells | Dec 1999 | A |
6007513 | Anis | Dec 1999 | A |
6024751 | Lovato | Feb 2000 | A |
6032673 | Savage | Mar 2000 | A |
6039748 | Savage | Mar 2000 | A |
6042552 | Cornier | Mar 2000 | A |
6068641 | Varsseveld | May 2000 | A |
6086542 | Glowa | Jul 2000 | A |
6090094 | Clifford | Jul 2000 | A |
6090123 | Culp | Jul 2000 | A |
6113594 | Savage | Sep 2000 | A |
6119973 | Galloway | Sep 2000 | A |
6120147 | Vijfvinkel | Sep 2000 | A |
6120462 | Hibner | Sep 2000 | A |
6132448 | Perez | Oct 2000 | A |
6149633 | Maaskamp | Nov 2000 | A |
6156049 | Lovato | Dec 2000 | A |
6159160 | Hsei | Dec 2000 | A |
6159209 | Hakky | Dec 2000 | A |
6203518 | Anis | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217543 | Anis | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224603 | Marino | May 2001 | B1 |
6244228 | Kuhn | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258111 | Ross | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277096 | Cortella | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6315714 | Akiba | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6358200 | Grossi | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358263 | Mark | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6359200 | Day | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6402701 | Kaplan | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6428486 | Ritchart | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6471639 | Rudischhauser | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6494892 | Ireland | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6585708 | Maaskamp | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610066 | Dinger | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6626827 | Felix | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632182 | Treat | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6656132 | Ouchi | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6712773 | Viola | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6824544 | Boebel | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6837847 | Ewers | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7025720 | Boebel | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7025732 | Thompson | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7150713 | Shener | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7226459 | Cesarini | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7249602 | Emanuel | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7510563 | Cesarini | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7763033 | Gruber | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7922737 | Cesarini | Apr 2011 | B1 |
8025656 | Gruber | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8061359 | Emanuel | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8062214 | Shener | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8419626 | Shener-Irmakoglu | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8465421 | Finkman | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8528563 | Gruber | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8574253 | Gruber | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8647349 | Gruber | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8663264 | Cesarini | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8678999 | Isaacson | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8834487 | Gruber | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8840625 | Adams | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8840626 | Adams | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8852085 | Shener-Irmakoglu | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8893722 | Emanuel | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8932208 | Kendale | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8951274 | Adams | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9060760 | Sullivan | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9060800 | Cesarini | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9060801 | Cesarini | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9066745 | Cesarini | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9072431 | Adams | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9089358 | Emanuel | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9095366 | Sullivan | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9125550 | Shener-Irmakoglu | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9155454 | Sahney | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9259233 | Gruber | Feb 2016 | B2 |
20010039963 | Spear | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047183 | Privitera | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020058859 | Brommersma | May 2002 | A1 |
20020165427 | Yachia | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030050603 | Todd | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050638 | Yachia | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030078609 | Finlay | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030114875 | Sjostrom | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040204671 | Stubbs | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050043690 | Todd | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050085692 | Kiehn | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060036132 | Renner | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047185 | Shener | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060241586 | Wilk | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20080015621 | Emanuel | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080058588 | Emanuel | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058842 | Emanuel | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097468 | Adams | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097469 | Gruber | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097470 | Gruber | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097471 | Adams | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080135053 | Gruber | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080146872 | Gruber | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080146873 | Adams | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080245371 | Gruber | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249366 | Gruber | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249534 | Gruber | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249553 | Gruber | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262308 | Prestezog | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090082628 | Kucklick | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090270812 | Litscher | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270895 | Churchill | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270896 | Sullivan | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270897 | Adams | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270898 | Chin | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100087798 | Adams | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100152647 | Shener | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110034943 | Churchill | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110077674 | Sullivan | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110118544 | Adams | May 2011 | A1 |
20110166419 | Reif | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120067352 | Gruber | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120078038 | Sahney | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130131452 | Kuroda | May 2013 | A1 |
20140031834 | Germain | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3339322 | May 1984 | DE |
3206381 | Jul 1986 | DE |
3601453 | Sep 1986 | DE |
3615694 | Nov 1987 | DE |
4038398 | Jun 1992 | DE |
4440035 | May 1996 | DE |
19633124 | May 1997 | DE |
19751632 | Sep 1999 | DE |
102006022827 | Dec 2006 | DE |
0310285 | Apr 1989 | EP |
0327410 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0557044 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0582295 | Feb 1994 | EP |
0606531 | Jul 1994 | EP |
0621008 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0806183 | May 1997 | EP |
1681022 | Jul 2006 | EP |
2093353 | Sep 1982 | GB |
2311468 | Oct 1997 | GB |
2001-75416 | May 1989 | JP |
2002 529185 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002 538889 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2003 245247 | Sep 2003 | JP |
1006944 | Mar 1999 | NL |
WO 198101648 | Jun 1981 | WO |
WO 199211816 | Jul 1992 | WO |
WO 199307821 | Apr 1993 | WO |
WO 199315664 | Aug 1993 | WO |
WO 199426181 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 199505777 | Mar 1995 | WO |
WO 199510981 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO 199510982 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO 199522935 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO 199530377 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 199611638 | Apr 1996 | WO |
WO 199626676 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO 199709922 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO 199717027 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 199719642 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 199724071 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 199734534 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO 199735522 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 199809569 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 199810707 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 199846147 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 199903407 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 199903409 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 199907295 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 199911184 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 199939648 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 199944506 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 199960935 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 200012010 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 200028890 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 200033743 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 200044295 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 200047116 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 200057797 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 200135831 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 200158368 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 200195810 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 2002069808 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 2003022164 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 2003077767 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2005060842 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005096963 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2006105283 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO 2006121968 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2006121970 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007044833 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2012044705 | Apr 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
ACMI Corporation, “Dolphin II Hysteroscopic Fluid Management Systems,” ACMI Corporation, 2002 (1 page). |
ACMI Corporation, “Dolphin II and Disten-U-Flo Fluid Management Systems for Hysteroscopy”, ACMI Corporation, 2002 (1 page). |
Bacsko “Uterine Surgery by Operative Hysteroscopy”, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 71, pp. 219-222, 1997 (4 pages). |
Baggish et al., “Diagnostic and Operative Hysterectomy,” Mosby, pp. 97-105, 123-125, 127-132, 353-355, and 394-398, 1999 (27 pages). |
C.R. Bard, Inc, “The HydroFlex HD System” (1 page). |
Cravello et al., “Hysteroscopic Resection of Fibroids: Results with a 6-Year Follow-up Period”, Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, vol. 15, No. 1, 1-5 1999 (5 pages). |
Defendant Hologic Inc.'s Preliminary, Non-Binding List of Asserted Prior Art References, dated Feb. 8, 2012, in Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., Civil Action Nos. 11-12064-RWZ and 10-10951-RWZ, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (7 pages). |
Dictionary definition of reciprocate, Merrian-Webster Dictionary, on-line edition, retrieved Mar. 20, 2013 (1 page). |
Dictionary definition of rotate, Merriam-Webster Dictionary, on-line edition, retrieved Mar. 20, 2013 (1 page). |
Dictionary definition of translate, Merriam-Webster Dictionary, on-line edition, retrieved Mar. 20, 2013 (1 page). |
Drews et al., “Surgical Approach to Myomas: Laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy”, Seminars in Reproductive Endocrinology, vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 367-377, 1992 (11 pages). |
Dumesic et al., “A New Approach to Hysteroscopic Cannulation of the Fallopian Tube”, Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 7-9, 1991 (3 pages). |
Emanuel et al., “Long-term Results of Hysteroscopic Myomectomy for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding”, Obstetrics & Gynecoogy, vol. 93, No. 5, Part I, pp. 743-748, 1999 (6 pages). |
European Patent Application No. 05 786 521.4-2305, Examination Report dated Apr. 21, 2010 (4 pages). |
European Patent Application No. 05 786 521.4-2305, Examination Report dated Sep. 26, 2012 (5 pages). |
European Patent Application No. 11 770 261.3-1657, Examination Report dated Feb. 11, 2014 (4 pages). |
Exhibit P to Hologic's Opposition to Smith & Nephew's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Redacted, filed Dec. 30, 2011, in Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., Civil Action No. 11-12064-RWZ, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (99 pages). |
Franchini et al., “Endometrial resection: a diagnostic tool in postmenopausal women”, Gynecological Endoscopy, 8, pp. 111-114, 1999 (5 pages). |
“From Distention to Deficit Monitoring Taking the All-In-One Approach”, W.O.M. World of Medicine (1 page). |
Gerber et al., “The Endoscapel: A new endoscopic instrument for supracervical hysterectomy and morcellation of masses; clinical evaluation”, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 86, p. S12, 1999 (1 page). |
Gynecare “Motor Drive Unit” Instructions for Use (3 pages). |
Gynecare X-Tract, “Tissue Morcellator”, Instructions for Use (3 pages). |
Gynecare, “Fluid Management System” Instructions for Use (26 pages). |
Gynescope Corporation “Laser Fiber Director”, Advertisement, Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, vol. 6, No. 1, 1990 (2 pages). |
Hess et al., “Textbook of Bilio-Pancreatic Disease”, vol. III, PICCIN, e.g. Fig 6.5.1, pp. 1584-1586, 1997 (5 pages). |
Hologic's Opposition to Smith & Nephew's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Redacted, filed Dec. 30, 2011, in Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., Civil Action No. 11-12064-RWZ, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (26 pages). |
“HysteRo-Purator 1143-1 Technical Data” WISAP (2 pages). |
International Application No. PCT/US2005/029807, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 28, 2007 (9 pages). |
International Application No. PCT/US2005/029807, International Search Report dated Jun. 13, 2006 (5 pages). |
International Application No. PCT/US2011/053753, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 2, 2013 (7 pages). |
International Application No. PCT/US2011/053753, International Search Report dated Dec. 20, 2011 (4 pages). |
Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-530014, Translation of Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2011 (10 pages). |
Karl Storz “Pilot a Course to Successful Outcomes”, Intermetro Industries Corporation, 2001 (2 pages). |
Karl Storz “Uterine Resectoscopes for Endometrial Ablation and Resection”, Advertisement, Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, vol. 6, No. 1, 1990 (3 pages). |
Karl Storz, Advertisement, Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, vol. 5, No. 4, 1989 (3 pages). |
Lin et al. “Clinical Applications of a New Fujinon Operating Fiberoptic Hysteroscope”, Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 81-87, 1990 (7 pages). |
Mettler et al., “Pelviscopic uterine surgery” Surgical Endoscopy, 6, pp. 23-31, 1992 (9 pages). |
Neis et al., “Hysteroscopy: Textbook and Atlas”, Thieme Medical Publishers, pp. 91-103, 1994 (13 pages). |
Nisolle et al., “Endometrial ablation with the Nd-YAG laser in dysfunctional bleeding” Minimally Invasive Therapy, vol. 1, pp. 35-39, 1991 (5 pages). |
Olympus Product Catalogue: Part No. A2461—OP Nephroscope, Sep. 1991 (3 pages). |
Park et al., “Endoscopic Management of Uterine Myoma”, Yonsei Medical Journal, vol. 40, No. 6, pp. 583-588, 1999 (6 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Action Closing Prosecution mailed Sep. 19, 2013 (41 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Appendices 14-28 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,459, Claim Charts for Various Claims in view of Various References (436 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Appendix 2 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,459, Memorandum of Decision dated Apr. 21, 2011, in Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Interlace Medical, Inc., Civil Action No. 10-10951-RWZ, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (14 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Appendix 6 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,459, Opening Markman Brief of Plaintiff Smith & Nephew, Inc. dated Oct. 13, 2010, in Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Interlace Medical, Inc., Civil Action No. 10-10951-RWZ, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (23 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Appendix 7 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,459, Defendant Interlace Medical, Inc's Responsive Markman Brief (Redacted) dated Oct. 27, 2010, in Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Interlace Medical, Inc., Civil Action No. 10-10951-RWZ, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (26 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Appendix 8 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,459, Plaintiff Smith & Nephew, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Markman Brief dated Nov. 3, 2010, in Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Interlace Medical, Inc., Civil Action No. 10-10951-RWZ, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (8 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Examiner's Answer dated Mar. 25, 2015 (3 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Executed Expert Declaration of Hal Walbrink in support of Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,459, Executed Mar. 9, 2012 (42 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, First Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2012 (37 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Litigation Search Report CRU 3999 dated Mar. 29, 2012 (24 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Order Granting Request for Reexamination mailed Jun. 5, 2012 (29 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Patent Owner's Apr. 14, 2014 Appeal Brief (334 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Patent Owner's Feb. 13, 2014 Notice of Appeal (2 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Patent Owner's Aug. 6, 2012 Response to First Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2012 (156 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Patent Owner's Jun. 3, 2013 Response to Second Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2013 (37 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Patent Owner's Oct. 21, 2013 Response to Action Closing Prosecution mailed Sep. 19, 2013 (180 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Right of Appeal Notice mailed Jan. 14, 2014 (58 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Second Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2013 (56 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Third Party's Dec. 19, 2012 Response to Notification of Defective Paper and Comments on First Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2012 (38 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Third Party's Jul. 3, 2013 Comments on Second Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2013 (62 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Third Party's Mar. 12, 2012 Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,459 (130 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Third Party's May 14, 2014 Respondent's Brief (303 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Third Party's Nov. 20, 2013 Comments on Action Closing Prosecution mailed Sep. 19, 2013 (38 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Third Party's Sep. 5, 2012 Comments on First Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2012 (210 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,955, Appendix 19 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, Opening Claim Construction Brief of Defendant Hologic, Inc., dated Feb. 24, 2012, in Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., Civil Action No. 11-12064-RWZ, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (24 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,955, Appendix 20 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, Opening Markman Brief of Plaintiff Smith & Nephew, Inc., dated Feb. 24, 2012, in Smith & Nephew, Inc.. v. Hologic, Inc., Civil Action No. 11-12064-RWZ, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (24 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,955, Appendix 28 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, Claim chart for anticipation of claims 1-8 based on U.S. Pat. No. 5,456,689 to Kresch (4 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,955, Appendix 29 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, Claim chart for anticipation of claims 1-8 based on U.S. Pat. No. 6,032,673 to Savage (13 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,955, Appendix 30 to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, Claim chart for anticipation of claims 1-8 based on U.S. Pat. No. 3,945,375 to Banko (4 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,955, Decision Denying Petition mailed Sep. 28, 2012 (5 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,955, Executed Expert Declaration of Dr. Henry A. Dominicis in support of Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, Executed Apr. 1, 2012 (150 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,955, Executed Expert Declaration of Hal Walbrink in support of Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, Executed Apr. 2, 2012 (22 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,955, Litigation Search Report CRU 3999 dated Apr. 3, 2012 (33 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,955, Order Denying Request for Inter Partes Reexamination mailed Jun. 4, 2012 (35 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,955, Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, filed Apr. 2, 2012 (265 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,955, Request for Reconsideration of Third Party Requestor's Petition for Reexamination mailed Jul. 3, 2012 (32 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Executed Expert Declaration of Dr. Henry A. Dominicis in support of Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359, Executed Jul. 24, 2012 (101 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, First Action Closing Prosecution mailed Aug. 9, 2013 (34 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, First Office Action dated Sep. 19, 2012 (37 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Litigation Search Report CRU 3999 dated Aug. 13, 2012 (29 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Patent Owner's Mar. 5, 2015 Notice of Appeal (2 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Patent Owner's Jan. 22, 2013 Response to First Office Action dated Sep. 19, 2012 (379 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Patent Owner's Mar. 24, 2014 Response to Second Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2014 (55 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Patent Owner's Sep. 29, 2014 Response to Second Action Closing Prosecution mailed Aug. 27, 2014 (12 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Patent Owner's Sep. 9, 2013 Response to First Action Closing Prosecution dated Aug. 9, 2013 (159 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Reexam Order mailed Sep. 19, 2012 (54 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Right of Appeal Notice mailed Feb. 4, 2015 (35 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Second Action Closing Prosecution mailed Aug. 27, 2014 (35 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Second Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2014 (31 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Third Party's Apr. 23, 2014 Comments on Second Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2014 (117 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Third Party's Feb. 21, 2013 Comments on First Office Action dated on Sep. 19, 2012 (771 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Third Party's Jul. 24, 2012 Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359 (1050 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Third Party's Oct. 19, 2012 Request for Reconsideration of Certain Decisions Regarding Third Party Requestor's Request for Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,359 (19 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Third Party's Oct. 29, 2014 Comments on Second Action Closing Prosecution dated Aug. 27, 2014 (31 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Third Party's Oct. 9, 2013 Comments on First Action Closing Prosecution dated Aug. 9, 2013 (25 pages). |
Reference AQ “Fishing Reel produced and sold by Shimano of Japan in to the U.S. prior to Oct. 26, 2001,” as cited in the IDS filed Oct. 17, 2005 in the prosecution file history of U.S. Appl. No. 09/983,810 (7 pages). |
Richard Wolf “‘Morce—Power 2306’ Electronic Morcellator” (2 pages). |
Richard Wolf “The Fluid Manager” (2 pages). |
Sheth, “Fiberoptic Light for Oophorectomy at Vaginal Hysterectomy”, Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 119-122, 1998 (4 pages). |
Sugimoto “A Color Atlas of Hysteroscopy” Springer-Verlag Tokyo, 1999 (17 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/486,977, Office Action dated Sep. 7, 2005 (7 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/780,759, Applicant's Mar. 31, 2011 Response to Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2010 (15 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/780,759, Applicant's Oct. 25, 2010 Response to Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2010 (13 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/780,759, Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2011 (7 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/780,759, Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2010 (5 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/780,759, Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2010 (7 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/929,938, Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2011 (10 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/929,938, Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2010 (10 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/929,940, Advisory Action dated Sep. 10, 2010 (3 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/929,940, Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2009 (9 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/929,940, Office Action dated Jul. 1, 2010 (12 pages). |
Valle “Hysteroscopic Removal of Submucous Leiomyomas”, Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 89-96, 1990 (9 pages). |
Weck “A Direct Path to Diagnostic and Operative Control: The Weck-Baggish Hysteroscopy System” Advertisement, Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, vol. 7, No. 1, 1991 (2 pages). |
Williamson et al., Editorial 1 “Complications of hysteroscopic treatments of menorrhagia”, British Journal of Anesthesia, vol. 77, No. 3, pp. 305-308, 1996 (4 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Patent Owner's May 5, 2015 Appeal Brief (47 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Third Party's Jun. 5, 2015 Respondent Brief (21 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Patent Owner's Jul. 1, 2015 Corrected Appeal Brief (47 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Third Party's Jul. 24, 2015 Resubmitted Respondent Brief (21 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Examiner's Answer dated Sep. 17, 2015 (3 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/002,058, Patent Owner's Oct. 19, 2015 Rebuttal Brief (25 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Patent Owner's Apr. 24, 2015 Rebuttal Brief (8 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Patent Trial and Appeal Board's Jan. 20, 2016 Decision on Appeal (35 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Patent Owner's Feb. 19, 2016 Request for Rehearing (18 pages). |
Reexamination No. 95/001,933, Third Party's Mar. 18, 2016 Opposition to Request for Rehearing (14 pages). |
Canadian Patent Application No. 2,578,035, Office Action dated Nov. 21, 2014, 4 pages. |
European Patent Application No. 05 786 521.4, Office Action dated Mar. 11, 2015, 4 pages. |
European Patent Application No. 05 786 521.4, Office Action dated Apr. 26, 2016, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160220102 A1 | Aug 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14473389 | Aug 2014 | US |
Child | 14811331 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14811331 | Jul 2015 | US |
Child | 15095997 | US | |
Parent | 13860654 | Apr 2013 | US |
Child | 14473389 | US | |
Parent | 13212240 | Aug 2011 | US |
Child | 13860654 | US | |
Parent | 10927244 | Aug 2004 | US |
Child | 13212240 | US |