This invention relates to alloys of titanium having at least 50% titanium and most specifically to an alloy of titanium particularly useful in the aerospace and defense industries known as 6/4 which is about 6% by weight aluminum and about 4% by weight vanadium with the balance titanium and trace materials as made by the Armstrong process.
The ASTM B265 grade 5 chemical specifications for 6/4 require that vanadium is present in the amount of 4%±1% by weight and aluminum is present in the range of from about 5.5% to about 6.75% by weight. The alloy of the invention is produced by the Armstrong Process as previously disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,779,761; 5,958,106 and 6,409,797, the entire disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference. The aforementioned patents teach the Armstrong Process as it relates to the production of various materials including alloys. The Armstrong Process includes the subsurface reduction of halides by a molten metal alkali or alkaline earth element or alloy. The development of the Armstrong Process has occurred from 1994 through the present, particularly as it relates to the production of titanium and its alloys using titanium tetrachloride as a source of titanium and using sodium as the reducing agent. Although this invention is described particularly with respect to titanium tetrachloride, aluminum trichloride and vanadium tetrachloride and sodium as a reducing metal, it should be understood that various halides other than chlorine can be used and various reductants other than sodium can be used and the invention is broad enough to include those materials.
However, because the Armstrong Process over the past eleven years has been developed using molten sodium and chlorides, it is these materials which are referenced herein. During the production of titanium by the Armstrong Process, as disclosed in the previous patents, the steady state temperature of the reaction can be controlled by the amount of reductant metal and the amount of chloride being introduced. Although it is feasible to control the reaction temperature by varying the chloride concentration while keeping the amount of molten metal constant, the preferred method is to control the temperature of the reactant products by varying the amount of excess (over stoichiometric) reductant metal introduced into the reaction chamber. Preferably, the reaction is maintained at a steady state temperature of about 400° C. and at this temperature, as previously disclosed, the reaction can be maintained for very long periods of time without damage to the equipment while producing a relatively uniform product.
Heretofore, commercially pure (CP) titanium ASTM 8265 grades 1, 2, 3 and 4 have been produced in over two hundred runs using the Armstrong Process and although a wide variety of operating parameters have been tested, certain results are inherent in the process. The ASTM B 265 spec sheet follows:
A Analysis shall be completed for all elements listed in this Table for each grade. The analysis results for the elements not quantified in the Table need not be reported unless the concentration level is greater than 0.1% each or 0.4% total.
BLower hydrogen may be obtained by negotiation with the manufacturer.
C Need not be reported.
D A residual is an element present in a metal or an alloy in small quantities inherent to the manufacturing process but not added intentionally.
E The purchaser may, in his written purchase order, request analysis for specific residual elements not listed in this specification. The maximum allowable concentration for residual elements shall be 0.1% each and 0.4% maximum total.
FThe percentage of titanium is determined by difference.
Production of titanium powder by the Armstrong Process inherently produces powder in which the average diameter of individual particle is less than a micron. During distillation at 500 to 600° C., the particles agglomerate and have an average agglomerated particle diameter in the range of from about 3.3 to about 1.3 microns. Particle diameters are based on a calculated size of a sphere from a surface area, such as BET. For agglomerated particles, the calculated average diameters were based on surface are measurements in a range of from about 0.4 to about 1.0 m2 per gram. In over two hundred runs, the titanium powder produced by the Armstrong Process always has a packing fraction in the range of from about 4% to about 11% which also may also be expressed as tap density. Tap density is a well known characteristic and is determined by introducing the powder into a graduated test tube and tapping the tube until the powder is fully settled. Thereafter, the weight of the powder is measured and the packing fraction or percent of theoretical density is calculated.
Moreover, during the production of CP titanium by the Armstrong Process, a certain amount of sodium has always been retained even after extensive distillation, including vacuum distillation, and this retained sodium has been present on average of about 500-700 ppm, and has rarely been below about 400 ppm. From a commercial point of view, significant effort is and has been expended in order to reduce the sodium content of CP titanium made by the Armstrong Process.
Prior to the Armstrong Process, CP titanium powder and titanium alloy powder traditionally have been made by two methods, hydride-dehydride and spheridization, resulting in powders having very different morphologies than the powder made by the Armstrong method. Hydride-dehydride powders are angular and flake-like, while spheridized powders are spheres.
Fines made during the Hunter process are available and these also have very different morphology than CP titanium produced by the Armstrong Process. SEMs of CP powder made by the hydride-dehydride process and the spheridization process and Hunter fines are illustrated in
6/4 powder is made by hydride-dehydride and spherization processes, but not by the Hunter process. A calcium reduction hydride-dehydride process used in Tula, Russia was identified by Moxson et al. in an article in The International Journal Of Powder Metallurgy, Vol. 34, No. 5, 1998. Moxson et al which also discloses SEMs of both CP and 6/4 in the Journal Of Metallurgy, May, 2000, both articles, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference, taken together showing that 6/4 powder made by methods other than the Armstrong process result in powders that are very different from Armstrong 6/4 powder, both in size distribution and/or morphology and/or chemistry. In some cases, such as the calcium reduction process in Tula, Russia there are very significant differences in chemistry as well as the other differences previously mentioned. Both the hydride-dehydride and spheridization methods require Ti, Al and V to be mixed as liquids and thereafter formed into powder. Only the Armstrong Process produces alloy powder directly from gas mixtures of the alloy constituents.
Because 6/4 titanium is the most common titanium alloy used by the Department of Defense (DOD) as well as the aerospace industry and other significant industries, the production of 6/4 by the Armstrong Process is an important commercial goal.
Accordingly, a principal object of the present invention is to provide a titanium base alloy powder having lesser amounts of aluminum and vanadium with unique morphological and chemical properties.
Another object of the present invention to provide a titanium base alloy powder having about 6 percent by weight aluminum and about 4 percent by weight vanadium within current ASTM specifications.
Yet another object of the invention is to make a 6/4 alloy as set forth in which sodium is present in significantly smaller amounts than is present in CP titanium powder made by the Armstrong Process.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a titanium base alloy powder having about 6% by weight aluminum and about 4% by weight vanadium with an alkali or alkaline earth metal being present in an amount less than about 200 ppm and the alloy powder being neither spherical nor angular or flake shaped.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a titanium base alloy powder having about 6% by weight aluminum and about 4% by weight vanadium with an alkali or alkaline earth metal being present in an amount less than about 200 ppm and having a tap density or packing fraction in the range of from about 4% to about 11%.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a titanium base alloy powder having about 6% by weight aluminum and about 4% by weight vanadium with an alkali or an alkaline earth metal being present in an amount less than about 200 ppm made by the subsurface reduction of chloride vapor with molten alkali metal or molten alkaline earth metal.
A final object of the present invention is to provide an agglomerated titanium base alloy powder having about 6% by weight aluminum and about 4% by weight vanadium with an alkali or alkaline earth metal being present in an amount less than about 100 ppm substantially as seen in the SEMs of
The invention consists of certain novel features and a combination of parts hereinafter fully described, illustrated in the accompanying drawings, and particularly pointed out in the appended claims, it being understood that various changes in the details may be made without departing from the spirit, or sacrificing any of the advantages of the present invention.
For the purpose of facilitating an understanding of the invention, there is illustrated in the accompanying drawings a preferred embodiment thereof, from an inspection of which, when considered in connection with the following description, the invention, its construction and operation, and many of its advantages should be readily understood and appreciated.
As used herein, a “titanium base alloy” means any alloy having 50% or more by weight titanium. Although 6/4 is used as a specific example, other titanium base alloys are included in this invention. As seen from the previous discussion, Armstrong CP titanium powder is different from spheridized titanium powder and from hydride-dehydride titanium powder in both morphology and packing fraction or tap density. There are also differences in certain of the chemical constituents. For instance, Armstrong CP titanium powder has sodium present in the 400-700 ppm range while spheridized and hydride-dehydride powder should have none or only trace amounts. Armstrong CP titanium has little chloride concentration, on the order of <50 ppm, while Hunter fines have much larger concentrations of chlorides, on the order of 0.12-0.15 wt. %.
The equipment used to produce the 6/4 alloy is substantially as disclosed in the aforementioned patents disclosing the Armstrong Process with the exception that instead of only having a titanium tetrachloride boiler 22 as illustrated in those patents, there is also a vanadium tetrachloride boiler and an aluminum trichloride boiler which are connected to the reaction chamber by suitable valves. The piping acts as a manifold so that the gases are completely mixed as they enter the reaction chamber and are introduced subsurface to the flowing liquid sodium. It was determined during production of the 6/4 alloy that aluminum trichloride is corrosive and required special materials not required for handling either titanium tetrachloride or vanadium tetrachloride. Therefore, Hastelloy C-276 was used for the aluminum trichloride boiler and the piping to the reaction chamber.
During most of the runs the steady state temperature of the reactor was maintained at about 400° C. by the use of sufficient excess sodium. Other operating conditions for the production of the alloy were as follows:
A device similar to that described in the incorporated Armstrong patents was used except that a VCl4 boiler and AlCl3 boiler were provided and both gases were fed into the line feeding TiCl4 into the liquid Na. The boiler pressures and system parameters are listed hereafter.
TiCl4 Boiler Pressure=500 kPa
VCl4 Boiler Pressure=630 kPa
AlCl3 Boiler Pressure=830 kPa
Inlet Na temperature=240° C.
Reactor Outlet Temperature=510 C.
Na Flowrate=40 kg/min
TiCl4 Flowrate=2.6 kg/min
For this specific experiment, a 7/32″ nozzle was used in the reactor to meter the mix of metal chloride vapors. A 0.040″ nozzle was used to meter the AlCl3 and a 0.035″ nozzle was used to meter the VCl4 into the TiCl4 stream. The reactor was operated for approximately 250 seconds injecting approximately 11 kg of TiCl4. The salt and titanium alloy solids were captured on a wedge wire filter and free sodium metal was drained away. The product cake containing titanium alloy, sodium chloride and sodium was distilled at approximately 100 milli-torr at 550 to 575° C. vessel wall temperatures for 20 hours. Once all the sodium metal was removed via distillation, the trap was re-pressurized with argon gas and heated to 750° C. and held at temperature for 48 hours. The vessel containing the salt and titanium alloy cake was cooled and the cake was passivated with a 0.7 wt % oxygen/argon mixture. After passivation, the cake was washed with deionized water and subsequently dried in a vacuum oven at less than 100° C.
Table 2 below sets forth a chemical analysis of various runs for 6/4 alloy from an experimental loop running the Armstrong Process.
As seen from the above Table 2, the sodium levels for 6/4 are very low on the order of 69 ppm and for certain runs, sodium levels have been undetectable. This result was unexpected because over two hundred runs of CP titanium have been made using the Armstrong Process, and sodium has always been present in the range of from about 400-700 ppm. Therefore, the lack of sodium in the 6/4 alloy was not only unexpected but an important consideration since sodium may adversely affect the welds of CP titanium.
Other important aspects shown in Table 2 are the percentages of vanadium and aluminum in the 6/4 showing an average of about 5.91% aluminum and about 4.29% vanadium for all of the runs. The runs reported in Table 2 were made with an experimental loop and the valving and control systems for metering the appropriate amount of both vanadium and aluminum were rudimentary. Advanced valving systems have now been installed to control more closely the amount of vanadium and aluminum in the 6/4 produced from the Armstrong Process, although even with the rudimentary control system, the 6/4 alloy was within ASTM specifications. Also of significance is the low iron and chloride content of the 6/4 alloy.
An additional unexpected feature of the 6/4 alloy compared to the CP titanium is the surface area, as determined using BET Specific Surface Area analysis with krypton as the adsorbate. In general, the specific surface area of the 6/4 alloy is much larger than the CP titanium and this also was unexpected. Surface analysis of CP particles which were distilled overnight (about 8-12 hours) between 500-575° C. were 0.534 square meters/gram whereas 6/4 alloy measured 3.12 square meters/gram, indicating that the alloy is significantly smaller than the CP.
The SEMs show that the 6/4 powder is “frillier” than CP powder, see
Because the 6/4 alloy made by the Armstrong Process is made without the presence of either calcium or magnesium, these metals should be present, if at all, only in trace amounts and certainly much less than 100 ppm. Sodium which would be expected to be present in significant quantities based on the operation of the Armstrong Process to produce CP titanium in fact is present only at minimum quantities in the 6/4 alloy. Specifically, sodium in the 6/4 alloy made by the Armstrong Process is almost always present less than 200 ppm and generally less than 100 ppm. In some instances, 6/4 alloy has been produced using the Armstrong Process in which sodium is undetectable so that this is a great and unexpected advantage of the 6/4 alloy vis a vis CP titanium made by the Armstrong Process.
Both the Armstrong CP titanium and 6/4 alloy have tap densities or packing fractions in the range of from about 4% to 11%. This tap density or packing fraction is unique and inherent in the Armstrong Process and, while not advantageous particularly with respect to powder metallurgical processing, distinguishes the CP powder and the 6/4 powder made by the Armstrong Process from all other known powders.
As is well known in the art, solid objects can be made by forming 6/4 or CP titanium into a near net shapes and thereafter sintering, see the Moxson et al. article and can also be formed by hot isostatic pressing, laser deposition, metal injecting molding, direct powder rolling or various other well known techniques. Therefore, the titanium alloy powder made by the Armstrong method may be formed into a sintered product or may be formed into a solid object by well known methods in the art and the subject invention is intended to cover all such products made from the powder of the subject invention.
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to a preferred embodiment hereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that several changes in form and detail may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention which includes titanium base alloys having lesser amounts of aluminum and vanadium and is specifically not limited to the specific alloys disclosed.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 12/879,598, filed Sep. 10, 2010; which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 11/186,724, filed Jul. 21, 2005, now abandoned. The entire contents of each of the above-referenced patent applications are hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1771928 | Jung | Jul 1930 | A |
2205854 | Kroll | Jun 1940 | A |
2607675 | Gross | Aug 1952 | A |
2647826 | Jordan | Aug 1953 | A |
2816828 | Benedict et al. | Dec 1957 | A |
2823991 | Kamlet | Feb 1958 | A |
2827371 | Quin | Mar 1958 | A |
2835567 | Willcox | May 1958 | A |
2846303 | Keller et al. | Aug 1958 | A |
2846304 | Keller et al. | Aug 1958 | A |
2882143 | Schmidt | Apr 1959 | A |
2882144 | Follows et al. | Apr 1959 | A |
2890112 | Winter | Jun 1959 | A |
2895823 | Lynskey | Jul 1959 | A |
2915382 | Hellier et al. | Dec 1959 | A |
2941867 | Maurer | Jun 1960 | A |
2944888 | Quin | Jul 1960 | A |
3058820 | Whitehurst | Oct 1962 | A |
3067025 | Chisholm | Dec 1962 | A |
3085871 | Griffiths | Apr 1963 | A |
3085872 | Kenneth | Apr 1963 | A |
3113017 | Homme | Dec 1963 | A |
3331666 | Robinson et al. | Jul 1967 | A |
3519258 | Ishizuka | Jul 1970 | A |
3535109 | Ingersoll | Oct 1970 | A |
3650681 | Sugahara et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3825415 | Johnston et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3836302 | Kaukeinen | Sep 1974 | A |
3847596 | Holland et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3867515 | Bohl et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3919087 | Brumagim | Nov 1975 | A |
3927993 | Griffin | Dec 1975 | A |
3943751 | Akiyama et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3966460 | Spink | Jun 1976 | A |
4007055 | Whittingham | Feb 1977 | A |
4009007 | Fry | Feb 1977 | A |
4017302 | Bates et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4070252 | Bonsack | Jan 1978 | A |
4128421 | Marsh et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4141719 | Hakko | Feb 1979 | A |
4149876 | Rerat | Apr 1979 | A |
4190442 | Patel | Feb 1980 | A |
4331477 | Kubo et al. | May 1982 | A |
4373947 | Buttner | Feb 1983 | A |
4379718 | Grantham et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4401467 | Jordan | Aug 1983 | A |
4402741 | Pollet et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4414188 | Becker | Nov 1983 | A |
4423004 | Ross | Dec 1983 | A |
4425217 | Beer | Jan 1984 | A |
4432813 | Williams | Feb 1984 | A |
4445931 | Worthington | May 1984 | A |
4454169 | Hinden et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4518426 | Murphy | May 1985 | A |
4519837 | Down | May 1985 | A |
4521281 | Kadija | Jun 1985 | A |
4555268 | Getz | Nov 1985 | A |
4556420 | Evans et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4604368 | Reeve | Aug 1986 | A |
4606902 | Ritter | Aug 1986 | A |
RE32260 | Fry | Oct 1986 | E |
4687632 | Hurd | Aug 1987 | A |
4689129 | Knudsen | Aug 1987 | A |
4725312 | Seon et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4828008 | White et al. | May 1989 | A |
4830665 | Winand | May 1989 | A |
4839120 | Baba et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4877445 | Okudaira et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4897116 | Scheel | Jan 1990 | A |
4902341 | Okudaira et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4915729 | Boswell et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4923577 | McLaughlin et al. | May 1990 | A |
4940490 | Fife et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4941646 | Stelts et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4985069 | Traut | Jan 1991 | A |
5028491 | Huang et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5032176 | Kametani et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5055280 | Nakatani et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5064463 | Ciomek | Nov 1991 | A |
5082491 | Rerat | Jan 1992 | A |
5147451 | Leland | Sep 1992 | A |
5149497 | McKee et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5160428 | Kuri | Nov 1992 | A |
5164346 | Giunchi et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5167271 | Lange et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176741 | Bartlett et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5176810 | Volotinen et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5211741 | Fife | May 1993 | A |
5259862 | White et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5338379 | Kelly | Aug 1994 | A |
5356120 | König et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5427602 | DeYoung et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5437854 | Walker et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5439750 | Ravenhall et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5448447 | Chang | Sep 1995 | A |
5460642 | Leland | Oct 1995 | A |
5498446 | Axelbaum et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5580516 | Kumar | Dec 1996 | A |
H1642 | Jenkins | Apr 1997 | H |
5637816 | Schneibel | Jun 1997 | A |
5779761 | Armstrong et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5897830 | Abkowitz et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5914440 | Celik et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5948495 | Stanish et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5951822 | Knapick et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954856 | Pathare et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5958106 | Armstrong et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5986877 | Pathare et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993512 | Pargeter et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6010661 | Abe et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6027585 | Patterson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6040975 | Mimura | Mar 2000 | A |
6099664 | Davies | Aug 2000 | A |
6103651 | Leitzel | Aug 2000 | A |
6136062 | Loffeholz et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6180258 | Klier | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6193779 | Reichert et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210461 | Elliott | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6238456 | Wolf et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6309570 | Fellabaum | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309595 | Rosenberg et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6409797 | Armstrong et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6432161 | Oda et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6488073 | Blenkinsop et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502623 | Schmitt | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6602482 | Kohler et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6689187 | Oda | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6727005 | Gimondo et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6745930 | Schmitt | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6824585 | Joseph et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6861038 | Armstrong et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6884522 | Adams et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6902601 | Nie et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6921510 | Ott et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6955703 | Zhou et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7041150 | Armstrong et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7351272 | Armstrong et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7410610 | Woodfield et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7435282 | Armstrong et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7445658 | Armstrong et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7501007 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7501089 | Armstrong et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
20020005090 | Armstrong et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020050185 | Oda | May 2002 | A1 |
20020152844 | Armstrong et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020194953 | Rosenberg et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030061907 | Armstrong et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030145682 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030230170 | Woodfield | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040123700 | Zhou et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050081682 | Armstrong et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050150576 | Venigalla | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050225014 | Armstrong et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050284824 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060086435 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060102255 | Woodfield et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060107790 | Anderson et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060123950 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060150769 | Armstrong et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060230878 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070017319 | Jacobsen et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070079908 | Jacobsen et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070180951 | Armstrong et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070180952 | Lanin et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080031766 | Kogut et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080152533 | Ernst et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080187455 | Armstrong et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080199348 | Armstrong et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
587782 | Nov 1985 | AU |
2003263081 | Jun 2004 | AU |
2196534 | Feb 1996 | CA |
0298698 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0299791 | Jan 1989 | EP |
1441039 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1657317 | May 2006 | EP |
722184 | Jan 1955 | GB |
778021 | Jul 1957 | GB |
31007808 | Sep 1956 | JP |
49042518 | Apr 1974 | JP |
51010803 | Apr 1976 | JP |
60255300 | Dec 1985 | JP |
6112837 | Jan 1986 | JP |
62065921 | Mar 1987 | JP |
64047823 | Feb 1989 | JP |
4116161 | Apr 1992 | JP |
05078762 | Mar 1993 | JP |
10502418 | Mar 1998 | JP |
11090692 | Apr 1999 | JP |
2001279345 | Oct 2001 | JP |
90840 | Jan 1958 | NO |
411962 | Jan 1974 | SU |
WO9604407 | Feb 1996 | WO |
WO9824575 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO2004022269 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO2004022797 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO2004022798 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO2004022799 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO2004022800 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO2004026511 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO2004028655 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO2004033736 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO2004033737 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO2004048622 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO2005019485 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO2005021807 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO2005023725 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO2005042792 | May 2005 | WO |
WO2007044635 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO2007089400 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO2008013518 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO2008079115 | Jul 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kelto et al. “Titanium Powder Metallurgy—A Perspective”; Conference: Powder Metallurgy of Titanium Alloys, Las Vegas, Nevada, Feb. 1980, pp. 1-19. |
Mahajan et al. “Microstructure Property Correlation in Cold Pressed and Sintered Elemental Ti-6A1-4V Powder Compacts”; Conference: Powder Metallurgy of Titanium Alloys, Las Vegas, Nevada, Feb. 1980, pp. 189-202. |
DeKock et al. “Attempted Preparation of Ti-6-4 Alloy Powders from TiCl4, Al, VCl4, and Na”; Metallurgical Transactions B, vol. 18B, No. 1, Process Metallurgy, Sep. 1987, pp. 511-517. |
Upadhyaya “Metal Powder Compaction”, Powder Metallurgy Technology, Published by Cambridge International Science Publishing, 1997; pp. 42-67. |
Moxson et al. “Production and Applications of Low Cost Titanium Powder Products”; The international Journal of Powder Metallurgy, vol. 34, No. 5, 1998, pp. 45-47. |
Alt “Solid-Liquid Separation, Introduction”; Ulmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, © 2002 by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co., Online Posting Date: Jun. 15, 2000, pp. 1-7. |
Gerdemann et al. “Characterization of a Titanium Powder Produced Through a Novel Continuous Process”; Published by Metal Powder Industries Federation, 2000, pp. 12.41-12.52. |
Moxson et al. “Innovations in Titanium Powder Processing”; Titanium Overview, JOM, May 2000, p. 24. |
Gerdemann “Titanium Process Technologies”; Advanced Materials & Processes, Jul. 2001, pp. 41-43. |
Lü et al. “Laser-Induced Materials and Processes for Rapid Prototyping” Published by Springer, 2001, pp. 153-154. |
Lee et al. “Synthesis of Nano-Structured Titanium Carbide by Mg-Thermal Reduction”; Scripta Materialia, 2003, pp. 1513-1518. |
Chandran et al. “TiBw-Reinforced Ti Composites: Processing, Properties, Application Prospects, and Research Needs”; Ti—B Alloys and Composites Overview, JOM, May 2004, pp. 42-48. |
Chandran et al. “Titanium-Boron Alloys and Composites: Processing, Properties, and Applications”; Ti—B Alloys and Composites Commentary, JOM, May 2004 pp. 32 and 41. |
Hanusiak et al. “The Prospects for Hybrid Fiber-Reinforced Ti—TiB-Matrix Composites”; Ti—B Alloys and Composites Overview, JOM, May 2004, pp. 49-50. |
Kumari et al. “High-Temperature Deformation Behavior of Ti—TiBw In-Situ Metal-Matrix Composites”; Ti—B Alloys and Composites Research Summary, JOM, May 2004, pp. 51-55. |
Saito “The Automotive Application of Discontinuously Reinforced TiB—Ti Composites”; Ti—B Alloys and Composites Overview, JOM, May 2004, pp. 33-36. |
Yolton “The Pre-Alloyed Powder Metallurgy of Titanium with Boron and Carbon Additions”; Ti—B Alloys and Composites Research Summary, JOM, May 2004, pp. 56-59. |
Research Report; P/M Technology News, Crucible Research, Aug. 2005, vol. 1, Issue 2, 2 pages. |
Peter et al, “Structure and properties of titanium and titanium alloys”, book edited by Leyens et al, Titanium and titanium alloys, Wiley-VCHGmbH&Co. KGaA, copyright 2003, pp. 1-23. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150040726 A1 | Feb 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12879598 | Sep 2010 | US |
Child | 14521646 | US | |
Parent | 11186724 | Jul 2005 | US |
Child | 12879598 | US |