When sharing a document among collaborators, users may either restrict access to the document itself or its filepath. Neither of these options provide for the flexible sharing and robust security that users desire. Restricting access to the document itself requires that a distributing user manually input the identities of authorized users (i.e., those users who are granted access to read or write to the document), but the document itself may still be visible (albeit not accessible) to unauthorized users. Providing a hidden filepath, in contrast, may prevent unauthorized users from coming across documents that are not accessible to them, but if a link is inadvertently shared, the security of the document will have been compromised. Alternatively, links may be limited in their accessibility to a domain, but a domain may include persons who are part of an organization, but lack the need-to-know, which will still require the document to be access restricted or the link to be not shared with those persons to maintain proper security within the domain.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description section. This summary is not intended to identify all key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Systems and methods for providing tokenized links are provided herein. A link that is tokenized points to a document and is associated with a permission scope that consists of a set of criteria for evaluating conditions at the time the link is accessed (e.g., identity, group membership, device state, time/date) to determine whether the user is granted access to the linked document. The link may be freely shared and still provide access restrictions within a domain to the linked document without needing to modify the permissions for the document itself. A user with access to the document may thus freely share the link (e.g., via emails, Instant Messages, forum posts) with other users, who may in turn share the link with yet other users, and be assured that only authorized users will gain access to the document.
The computing device hosting the linked-to file, such as a document server, receives the request for a document that includes the token for the document from a device associated with a requesting user. The hosting device uses the token and the identity of the requesting user to determine whether the permission criteria set for the link are satisfied by the requesting user. In response to the permission criteria being satisfied, the document is provided to the requesting user, otherwise the hosting device may query the requesting user for additional identifying information or may deny the request for the document. By verifying permissions relative to the tokenized link, rather than the document itself, distributing users may create multiple sharing profiles for a single document that obscure the location and identity of the document itself to unauthorized parties, provide greater flexibility in sharing the documents, and may require a lower expenditure of processing resources to handle, thus improving the functionality of the computer devices involved.
Examples are implemented as a computer process, a computing system, or as an article of manufacture such as a device, computer program product, or computer readable medium. According to an aspect, the computer program product is a computer storage medium readable by a computer system and encoding a computer program comprising instructions for executing a computer process.
The details of one or more aspects are set forth in the accompanying drawings and description below. Other features and advantages will be apparent from a reading of the following detailed description and a review of the associated drawings. It is to be understood that the following detailed description is explanatory only and is not restrictive of the claims.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this disclosure, illustrate various aspects. In the drawings:
The following detailed description refers to the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers are used in the drawings and the following description refers to the same or similar elements. While examples may be described, modifications, adaptations, and other implementations are possible. For example, substitutions, additions, or modifications may be made to the elements illustrated in the drawings, and the methods described herein may be modified by substituting, reordering, or adding stages to the disclosed methods. Accordingly, the following detailed description is not limiting, but instead, the proper scope is defined by the appended claims. Examples may take the form of a hardware implementation, or an entirely software implementation, or an implementation combining software and hardware aspects. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense.
Systems and methods for providing tokenized links are provided herein. A tokenized link points to a document and is associated with a permission scope that includes of a set of criteria for evaluating conditions at the time the link is accessed (e.g., identity, group membership, device state, time/date) to determine whether the user is granted access to the linked document. The link may be freely shared and still provide access restrictions within a domain to the linked document without modifying the permissions for the document itself. A user with access to the document may thus freely share the link (e.g., via emails, Instant Messages, forum posts) with other users, who may in turn share the link with yet other users, and be assured that only authorized users will gain access to the document.
The computing device hosting the linked-to file receives the request for a document that includes the token for the document from a device associated with a requesting user. The hosting device uses the token and the identity of the requesting user to determine whether the permission criteria set for the link are satisfied by the requesting user. In response to the permission criteria being satisfied, the document is provided to the requesting user, otherwise the hosting device may query the requesting user for additional identifying information or may deny the request for the document. By verifying permissions relative to the tokenized link, rather than the document itself, distributing users may create multiple sharing profiles for a single document that obscure the location and identity of the document itself to unauthorized parties, thereby providing greater flexibility in sharing the documents, and lowering the expenditure of processing resources to handle, thus improving the functionality of the computer devices involved.
The distributing device 110, the requesting device 120, document server 130, and identity service 150 are illustrative of a multitude of computing systems including, without limitation, desktop computer systems, wired and wireless computing systems, mobile computing systems (e.g., mobile telephones, netbooks, tablet or slate type computers, notebook computers, and laptop computers), hand-held devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, minicomputers, printers, and mainframe computers. The hardware of these computing systems is discussed in greater detail in regard to
In various aspects, the document 140 for which the tokenized link is generated includes any type of computer readable file that the distributing user wishes to share over a network. Example file types for the document include, but are not limited to: word processing documents, spreadsheets, databases, presentations, canvas files, images, sound files, videos, archives, webpages, executables, libraries, binaries, computer aided design files, certificates, and portions thereof.
The distributing device 110 is used by a user (a distributing user) to request a tokenized link for a document 140 stored on the document server 130 which is then shared with one or more requesting device 120 to enable the user (a receiving or requesting user) of that device to request the document 140 via the tokenized link from the document server 130 or forward the tokenized link to one or more additional requesting devices 120 to allow those users to forward the tokenized link or request the document 140. In various aspects, the distributing device 110 may also be a requesting device 120, such as, for example, when the distributing user attempts to request the document 140 via the tokenized link.
In various aspects, the document server 130 is provided by the distributing device 110 or by a separate computing device. The document server 130 stores the documents 140 for which tokenized links are created. The tokenized link points to the document server 130 and includes a token that is interpretable by the document server 130 to retrieve the linked-to document 140 when the requesting user is authorized to access that document 140. In various aspects, the document server 130 provides a link tokenizer 200 (discussed in greater detail in regard to
The users of the distributing device 110 and each requesting device 120 are authenticated by one or more identity services 150. The identity service 150 is operable to allow the users to log into the distributing device 110 or requesting device 120 as well as third party services (e.g., an online email application, a social networking website, a Virtual Private Network (VPN)). A given user may log into multiple identity services 150 via a single device, which will provide various identities for the user. For example, a user may log into a personal device's operating system as “John Doe”, and into an online email application as “DoeJohn2000@example.com”; the user is still the same person, but each identity service 150 may associate the user with different preferences, historical use data, and security settings. An identity service 150 logs the users into various systems by the use of a shared secret associated with a username and/or domain name, such as, for example, a password, a biometric marker, or an access token. When a user provides the shared secret held by the identity service 150, the user is logged into the identity service 150 will be provided with an authorization token to use the device, access files, or use a service that has its access controlled by the identity service 150.
In various aspects, an identity service 150 runs on a distributing device 110 or a requesting device 120, thus allowing local access to the devices when network connectivity is not available to a remote identity service 150. In additional aspects, an identity service 150 runs on the document server 130 or in a network environment hosting the document server 130. In yet other aspects, the identity service 150 is a third-party service running on a device that is not controlled by the distributing, requesting, or receiving users or the host of the document 140, which provides access control for one or more network environments or services.
The token generator 210 is in communication with the distributing device 110, the document storage 220, and the linking database 230. The distributing device 110 communicates the document 140 for which a token is to be generated and the permission criteria to the token generator 210, which produces a token for the document 140 and transmits the token to the distributing device 110 for use in a tokenized link. The token generator 210 transmits the identity of the document and/or its filepath in the document storage 220, the permissions criteria, and the token to the linking database 230, which associates these data and stores them for later lookup and cross-reference.
The permission checker 240 is in communication with requesting devices 120 using the tokenized links to request documents 140, the linking database 230, and the document storage 220. When a request for the document 140 is received from a requesting device 120, the permission checker 240 extracts the token from the request and queries the linking database 230 for the identity and/or filepath of the associated document 140 and the permission criteria for the tokenized link. The permission checker 240 compares the identity information from the requesting device 120, time at which the request was received, etc., to the permission criteria to determine whether the request satisfies the permission criteria. When the request does not satisfy the permission criteria, the permission checker 240 is operable to transmit a request to the requesting device 120 to provide identifying information that will satisfy the permission criteria or a message indicating that the requesting user is not authorized to access the document 140 via the tokenized link. When the request does satisfy the permission criteria, the permission checker 240 is operable to signal the document storage 220 to retrieve the linked-to document 140 and transmit it to the authorized requesting device 120.
The method proceeds to OPERATION 320, where the permission criteria for which users are allowed to follow the tokenized link to the document 140 are received. In various aspects, the permissions criteria are specified in conjunction with the initial request received at OPERATION 310, while in other aspects, the permissions criteria may be adjusted at a later time before or after the tokenized link has been generated. In some aspects, the permission criteria are based on the identity information for the distributing user, while in other aspects, the distributing user may specify various identity information, time windows, and access rights (e.g., read, read/write) for permission criteria. For example, the distributing user may specify that the tokenized link will only be available for a set period of time, to requesting users from a specified domain or subset of a domain (e.g., employees of Acme, Inc., employees of Acme, Inc. who are also part of the human resources department), to requesting users using permitted identity services 150 (or not using forbidden identity services 150), among other conditions. In yet other aspects, the permission criteria may be set to null, so that any user in possession of the tokenized link can access the document 140.
At OPERATION 330 a token is created for use in the tokenized link. The token is a value that is sufficiently random to prevent a user from guessing the identity of the document 140 linked to from its format, and distinct in its value from other tokens already in use. In various aspects, the token may be created based on a hashing of the filepath of the document 140 and a nonce (e.g., a timestamp) to ensure that each token generated is unique or at least statistically unlikely to be reused within a given link tokenizer 200. A hash function yields a one-way encryption of data, which may be done according to various algorithms known to those of ordinary skill in the art (SHA-2, SHA256, MD5, BLAKE2, Keccak, GOST, etc.). In other aspects, the token may be an incremented counter that is updated for each document 140 for which a tokenized link is requested.
Method 300 proceeds to OPERATION 340 where the document 140 is associated with the token, and the token is associated with the permission criteria. These associations are saved for accessing the document 140 via the tokenized link, which is discussed in greater detail in regard to
At OPERATION 350 the token is returned to the distributing device 110 for incorporation into the tokenized link. In various aspects, the tokenized link points to the document server 130 or the host for the network environment in which the document server 130 is provided. The distributing device 110 may, in various aspects, include the token as part of the path of the URL (Uniform Resource Locator) for the tokenized link or include the token as a query for the URL. Method 300 then concludes.
At DECISION 430 it is determined whether the permission criteria are satisfied. In response to determining that the permission criteria are satisfied, method 400 will proceed to OPERATION 440. In response to determining that the permission criteria are not satisfied, method 400 may optionally proceed to OPERATION 435 or OPERATION 445, or may wait until the permission criteria are satisfied.
In various aspects, the permission criteria include a time range in which the tokenized link is valid and the permission criteria will be determined to not be satisfied when the request is received outside of the specified time range. For example, a distributing user may specify that a given document 140 will be available from Tuesday until Friday, and any requesting user that uses the tokenized link before Tuesday or after Friday will be determined to not satisfy the permission criteria for the time range, whereas any requesting user that uses the tokenized link between Tuesday and Friday will be determined to satisfy the permission criteria for the time range.
When the permission criteria include a domain for which the tokenized link is valid (or invalid), the domain information of the requesting user are compared to the permission criteria. The domain information may be looked up from a domain controller and/or included in the request or when establishing the communications session between the requesting device 120 and the document server 130 (e.g., via a handshake procedure). For example, a distributing user may have specified that only users from domain X or verified by a given identity service 150 as belonging to domain X may access the document 140 via the tokenized link, and accordingly requesting users from those domains are determined to satisfy the permission criteria. In another example, a distributing user may have specified that users from domain X or verified by a given identity service 150 as belonging to domain X are forbidden from accessing the document 140 via the tokenized link, and accordingly requesting users from those forbidden domains are determined to not satisfy the permission criteria.
The permission criteria may also specify specific persons who are allowed or forbidden from using the tokenized link to access the document 140. The user identities for allowed users will therefore satisfy the permission criteria, and other user identifiers and the user identities for forbidden users will not satisfy the permission criteria. User identities may include usernames, email addresses, telephone numbers, account names/numbers, IP addresses or MAC address associated with a requesting device 120 for a requesting user, and other identifiers.
In additional aspects, the permission criteria include requirements or conditions related to the requesting device 120 that receives the document 140 from the document server 130, such as, for example: requiring the requesting device to be managed by the same Information Technology (IT) organization that manages the document server 130 or the distributing device 110, requiring the requesting device 120 to be connected to a particular network (such as the network managed by the IT organization that manages the document server 130) locally or remotely (e.g., via a Virtual Private Network), requiring that the identity of the user of the requesting device 120 match a specific list of allowed users (either as a list of individual identities, or a pre-set list (e.g., a distribution list, a directory service group, an access group for a cloud sharing platform). In further aspects, the permission criteria specify identity services 150 from which the user's identity was retrieved as either allowed or denied. For example, an IT administrator, who does not trust the security policies of a given identity service 150, sets a permission criteria that prevent users authenticated by a first identity service 150 from using the tokenized link to access the linked document 140, while allowing users authentication by a second identity service 150 to access the linked document 140 via the tokenized link.
As will be appreciated, permission criteria may combine time ranges, domains, individuals and/or device conditions for specifying when, how, and by whom a document 140 may be accessed. For example, a distributing user may specifies that John Doe and Jane Doe may each access a given document 140 before the end of the month, but only if they are authenticated by a given identity service 150 as being who they claim to be. Continuing the example, the distributing user may trust the authentication schema used by the given identity service 150 (e.g., a workplace domain controller) to be more up-to-date or secure than a different identity server 150 (e.g., a social media website's access controller).
At optional OPERATION 435 the document server 130 prompts the requesting user to supply identity information. For example, a requesting user may not be logged into any acceptable identity services 150 (according to the permission criteria), and a prompt will be transmitted to the requesting device 120 to explain to the user to log into an acceptable identity service 150 and reattempt the request via the tokenized link. In another example, a user is logged into an acceptable identity service 150, but did not supply the identity information to the document server 130, which queries the requesting device 120 for that information at optional OPERATION 435. Method 400 may return to DECISION 430 or perform optional OPERATION 445 after optional OPERATION 445.
At optional OPERATION 445 the distributing user who requested the tokenized link and set the permission criteria is contacted by the document server 130 in response to receiving a request for the linked-to document 140 that did not satisfy the permission criteria. In various aspects, the distributing user is contacted to prompt the distributing user to modify the permission criteria to allow the request. In other aspects, the distributing user is contacted to alert the distributing user to a number and/or frequency of requests for the document 140 to determine whether to take additional measures to safeguard the document 140 or to distribute the document 140 to a wider audience than the current permission criteria allow. In various aspects, the notification may indicate the user identity of the requesting user whose request did not satisfy the permission criteria, a time the request was made, and may include one or more failing document requests in a single notification. Method 400 may return to DECISION 430 or perform optional OPERATION 435 after optional OPERATION 445.
When the permission criteria are determined to have been satisfied, method 400 proceeds to OPERATION 440, where the document 140 associated with the token is identified. In various aspects, the token is used as a key value to retrieve the filepath for the document 140 from a linking database 230. Method 400 then returns the document 140 to the requesting user at OPERATION 450 by transmitting the document 140, or a portion thereof, to the requesting device 120. Method 400 then concludes.
While implementations have been described in the general context of program modules that execute in conjunction with an application program that runs on an operating system on a computer, those skilled in the art will recognize that aspects may also be implemented in combination with other program modules. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, components, data structures, and other types of structures that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types.
The aspects and functionalities described herein may operate via a multitude of computing systems including, without limitation, desktop computer systems, wired and wireless computing systems, mobile computing systems (e.g., mobile telephones, netbooks, tablet or slate type computers, notebook computers, and laptop computers), hand-held devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, minicomputers, and mainframe computers.
In addition, according to an aspect, the aspects and functionalities described herein operate over distributed systems (e.g., cloud-based computing systems), where application functionality, memory, data storage and retrieval and various processing functions are operated remotely from each other over a distributed computing network, such as the Internet or an intranet. According to an aspect, user interfaces and information of various types are displayed via on-board computing device displays or via remote display units associated with one or more computing devices. For example, user interfaces and information of various types are displayed and interacted with on a wall surface onto which user interfaces and information of various types are projected. Interaction with the multitude of computing systems with which implementations are practiced include, keystroke entry, touch screen entry, voice or other audio entry, gesture entry where an associated computing device is equipped with detection (e.g., camera) functionality for capturing and interpreting user gestures for controlling the functionality of the computing device, and the like.
As stated above, according to an aspect, a number of program modules and data files are stored in the system memory 504. While executing on the processing unit 502, the program modules 506 (e.g., link tokenizer 200) perform processes including, but not limited to, one or more of the stages of the methods 300 and 400 illustrated in
According to an aspect, the computing device 500 has one or more input device(s) 512 such as a keyboard, a mouse, a pen, a sound input device, a touch input device, etc. The output device(s) 514 such as a display, speakers, a printer, etc. are also included according to an aspect. The aforementioned devices are examples and others may be used. According to an aspect, the computing device 500 includes one or more communication connections 516 allowing communications with other computing devices 518. Examples of suitable communication connections 516 include, but are not limited to, radio frequency (RF) transmitter, receiver, and/or transceiver circuitry; universal serial bus (USB), parallel, and/or serial ports.
The term computer readable media, as used herein, includes computer storage media. Computer storage media include volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information, such as computer readable instructions, data structures, or program modules. The system memory 504, the removable storage device 509, and the non-removable storage device 510 are all computer storage media examples (i.e., memory storage.) According to an aspect, computer storage media include RAM, ROM, electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other article of manufacture which can be used to store information and which can be accessed by the computing device 500. According to an aspect, any such computer storage media is part of the computing device 500. Computer storage media do not include a carrier wave or other propagated data signal.
According to an aspect, communication media are embodied by computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data in a modulated data signal, such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism, and include any information delivery media. According to an aspect, the term “modulated data signal” describes a signal that has one or more characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media include wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, radio frequency (RF), infrared, and other wireless media.
According to an aspect, one or more application programs 650 are loaded into the memory 662 and run on or in association with the operating system 664. Examples of the application programs include phone dialer programs, e-mail programs, personal information management (PIM) programs, word processing programs, spreadsheet programs, Internet browser programs, messaging programs, and so forth. The system 602 also includes a non-volatile storage area 668 within the memory 662. The non-volatile storage area 668 is used to store persistent information that should not be lost if the system 602 is powered down. The application programs 650 may use and store information in the non-volatile storage area 668, such as e-mail or other messages used by an e-mail application, and the like. A synchronization application (not shown) also resides on the system 602 and is programmed to interact with a corresponding synchronization application resident on a host computer to keep the information stored in the non-volatile storage area 668 synchronized with corresponding information stored at the host computer. As should be appreciated, other applications may be loaded into the memory 662 and run on the mobile computing device 600.
According to an aspect, the system 602 has a power supply 670, which is implemented as one or more batteries. According to an aspect, the power supply 670 further includes an external power source, such as an AC adapter or a powered docking cradle that supplements or recharges the batteries.
According to an aspect, the system 602 includes a radio 672 that performs the function of transmitting and receiving radio frequency communications. The radio 672 facilitates wireless connectivity between the system 602 and the “outside world,” via a communications carrier or service provider. Transmissions to and from the radio 672 are conducted under control of the operating system 664. In other words, communications received by the radio 672 may be disseminated to the application programs 650 via the operating system 664, and vice versa.
According to an aspect, the visual indicator 620 is used to provide visual notifications and/or an audio interface 674 is used for producing audible notifications via the audio transducer 625. In the illustrated example, the visual indicator 620 is a light emitting diode (LED) and the audio transducer 625 is a speaker. These devices may be directly coupled to the power supply 670 so that when activated, they remain on for a duration dictated by the notification mechanism even though the processor 660 and other components might shut down for conserving battery power. The LED may be programmed to remain on indefinitely until the user takes action to indicate the powered-on status of the device. The audio interface 674 is used to provide audible signals to and receive audible signals from the user. For example, in addition to being coupled to the audio transducer 625, the audio interface 674 may also be coupled to a microphone to receive audible input, such as to facilitate a telephone conversation. According to an aspect, the system 602 further includes a video interface 676 that enables an operation of an on-board camera 630 to record still images, video stream, and the like.
According to an aspect, a mobile computing device 600 implementing the system 602 has additional features or functionality. For example, the mobile computing device 600 includes additional data storage devices (removable and/or non-removable) such as, magnetic disks, optical disks, or tape. Such additional storage is illustrated in
According to an aspect, data/information generated or captured by the mobile computing device 600 and stored via the system 602 are stored locally on the mobile computing device 600, as described above. According to another aspect, the data are stored on any number of storage media that are accessible by the device via the radio 672 or via a wired connection between the mobile computing device 600 and a separate computing device associated with the mobile computing device 600, for example, a server computer in a distributed computing network, such as the Internet. As should be appreciated such data/information are accessible via the mobile computing device 600 via the radio 672 or via a distributed computing network. Similarly, according to an aspect, such data/information are readily transferred between computing devices for storage and use according to well-known data/information transfer and storage means, including electronic mail and collaborative data/information sharing systems.
Implementations, for example, are described above with reference to block diagrams and/or operational illustrations of methods, systems, and computer program products according to aspects. The functions/acts noted in the blocks may occur out of the order as shown in any flowchart. For example, two blocks shown in succession may in fact be executed substantially concurrently or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality/acts involved.
The description and illustration of one or more examples provided in this application are not intended to limit or restrict the scope as claimed in any way. The aspects, examples, and details provided in this application are considered sufficient to convey possession and enable others to make and use the best mode. Implementations should not be construed as being limited to any aspect, example, or detail provided in this application. Regardless of whether shown and described in combination or separately, the various features (both structural and methodological) are intended to be selectively included or omitted to produce an example with a particular set of features. Having been provided with the description and illustration of the present application, one skilled in the art may envision variations, modifications, and alternate examples falling within the spirit of the broader aspects of the general inventive concept embodied in this application that do not depart from the broader scope.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5297032 | Trojan et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5321750 | Nadan | Jun 1994 | A |
5339392 | Risberg et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5432932 | Chen et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5819284 | Farber et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5959621 | Nawaz et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6026474 | Carter et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6188405 | Czerwinski et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6216141 | Straub et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6243676 | Witteman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6278448 | Brown et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6311058 | Wecker et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314425 | Serbinis | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6360254 | Linden et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6449638 | Wecker et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456334 | Duhault | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6510553 | Hazra | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6724403 | Santoro et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6807558 | Hassett et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6832355 | Duperrouzel et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6976210 | Silva et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7028264 | Santoro et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7054905 | Hanna et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7143066 | Shear | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7272639 | Levergood et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7376907 | Santoro et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7512607 | Nagano et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7536713 | Bartholomew | May 2009 | B1 |
7814172 | Martin et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7933632 | Flynt et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7987431 | Santoro et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7996566 | Sylvain et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8032930 | Hicks | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8346966 | Phatak et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8364951 | Peterka | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8544069 | Subbiah | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8572712 | Rice et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8584258 | La Rotonda et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8611544 | Herbach et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8955084 | Do et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9087208 | Ibel et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9547665 | Wood et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
20020038425 | Kanno | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030079136 | Ericta et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030110131 | Alain et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030196087 | Stringer et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040054628 | de Jong | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040257610 | Itoh | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005133 | Xia et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050251411 | Ishii et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050278259 | Gunaseelan | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060080103 | Van Breemen | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060184673 | Liebman | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190833 | Sangiovanni et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060259601 | Soelberg et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060286536 | Mohler et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070033637 | Yami | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070039055 | Plastina et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070130177 | Schneider et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070168490 | Kent et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070214482 | Nguyen | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070234215 | Graham et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239668 | Shin et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080020738 | Ho | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080115227 | Toutonghi | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120196 | Reed et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140664 | Hao et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140849 | Collazo | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080189617 | Covell et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080229211 | Herberger et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080262920 | O'neill et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090083266 | Poola et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090150947 | Soderstrom | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090187825 | Sandquist et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090234876 | Schigel et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235347 | Syed | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248794 | Helms et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090282005 | Kim et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090319376 | Mills | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100036967 | Caine et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100192211 | Bono et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198730 | Ahmed | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100205221 | Shaw et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100228989 | Neystadt et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100281093 | Poder et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299601 | Kaplan et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100302015 | Kipman et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318611 | Curtin et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110078775 | Yan | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110125742 | Haines et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110167036 | Liebman | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110173188 | Walsh et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110173547 | Lewis et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110202430 | Narayanan et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110225547 | Fong et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110269437 | Marusi et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110302133 | Kuruganti et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120005237 | Obata | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120102566 | Vrancken | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120197419 | Dhruv et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120204250 | Anderson | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120216296 | Kidron | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120317288 | Campana et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120330736 | Beckner | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120331529 | Ibel | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130110832 | Wood et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130110890 | Bailor | May 2013 | A1 |
20130110892 | Wood et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130191884 | Leicher | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140137232 | Kobayashi | May 2014 | A1 |
20140223527 | Bortz et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150143468 | Hebert et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150150106 | Lund | May 2015 | A1 |
20150213443 | Geffon | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150242597 | Danciu | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150310188 | Ford | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20170140658 | Aluvala | May 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9926127 | May 1999 | WO |
2011102825 | Aug 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Digi-Data LeapDrive Service”, Internet Storage Services Opportunity, Published by Digi-Data Corporation, Sep. 10, 2008, pp. 1-14. |
“Enable Anonymous Access”, Retrieved from <<https://support.office.com/en-us/article/enable-anonymous-access-3647cdd5-1ab8-48cf-b4ee-d1b652bbabdd?ocmassetID=HA010113018&CorrelationId=e06ccabb-2516-43c1-b0f8-7ef6d0c4a8c7&ui=en-US&rs=en-US&ad=US#BMenablelistlibrary?>>, Dec. 1, 2011, 3 Pages. |
“One True Media”, Retrieved from <<http://bcpslibraryinformationservices.pbworks.com/w/page/12773121/One%20True %20Media>>, Retrieved on: Dec. 5, 2011, 2 Pages. |
“Sharing Users and Content Across Multiple Sites”, Retrieved from <<https://www.drupal.org/node/201673>>, Mar. 19, 2010, 4 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S Appl. No. 13/282,595”, dated Aug. 24, 2015, 23 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/439,126”, dated Jul. 8, 2016, 9 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S Appl. No. 13/439,126”, dated Sep. 22, 2015, 8 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,897”, dated Nov. 8, 2016, 32 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,897”, dated Aug. 11, 2015, 32 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S Appl. No. 13/528,897”, dated Mar. 25, 2015, 31 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S Appl. No. 13/528,897”, dated Mar. 17, 2017, 36 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,897”, dated Oct. 6, 2017, 32 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,897”, dated Apr. 22, 2016, 32 Pages. |
Sohn, et al., “Content Sharing Between Home Networks by Using Personal Information and Associated Fuzzy Vault Scheme”, In IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 55, Issue 2, May 2009, pp. 431-437. |
Swift, Mike, “Blekko and Montage Let Users Make Web Search More Social”, Retrieved from <<http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jan/01/business/la-fi-websearch-20110101>>, Jan. 1, 2011, 3 Pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2017/051682”, dated Nov. 22, 2017, 10 Pages. |
Mackenzie, Neil, “Permissions in Azure DocumentDB”, Published on: Dec. 9, 2014 Available at: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/cloud_solution_architect/2014/12/09/permissions-in-azure-documentdb/. |
“Offers and Actions”, Retrieved on: Aug. 8, 2016 Available at: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc287684.aspx. |
Gommans, et al., “Token-based Authorization of Connection Oriented Network Resources”, In Proceedings of 1st International Workshop on Networks for Grid Applications, Oct. 29, 2004, 8 pages. |
Machulak, et al., “User-Managed Access to Web Resources”, In Technical Report No. CS-TR-1196, Mar. 2010, 12 pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/282,595”, dated Feb. 11, 2016, 21 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/282,595”, dated Oct. 18, 2017, 16 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/282,595”, dated Jan. 30, 2014, 20 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/282,595”, dated Apr. 24, 2013, 19 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/282,595”, dated Mar. 6, 2017, 16 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/439,126”, dated Feb. 28, 2014, 12 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/439,126”, dated Jul. 19, 2013, 12 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/528,897”, dated Jun. 27, 2018, 33 Pages. |
“First Office Action and Search Report Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201210419134.8”, dated Nov. 25, 2014, 15 Pages. |
“Second Office Action and Search Report Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201210419134.8”, dated Jul. 1, 2015, 11 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180089451 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |