Patent Application
20150212439
The present application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-012347, filed Jan. 27, 2014. The contents of this application are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The present disclosure relates to a toner and a method of manufacturing the toner, and in particular to a capsule toner and a method of manufacturing the capsule toner.
Toner particles of a capsule toner each include a core and a shell layer (capsule layer) residing on a surface of the core.
A toner according to the present disclosure includes a plurality of toner particles each including a core and a shell layer residing on a surface of the core. The shell layer has a plurality of cavities each exposing the core. Each of the toner particles has a distribution of surface hardness, as measured by a scanning probe microscope in a state where no external additive adheres to the toner particle, satisfying that the surface hardness is at least 1.10 times a surface hardness Ss in at least 75% and no greater than 95% by area ratio of a surface of the toner particle, where Ss denotes the surface hardness at a location where the core is exposed through any of the cavities.
A method of manufacturing a toner according to the present disclosure involves: forming cores; causing a preliminary external additive to adhere to a surface of the cores; forming, after the preliminary external additive is caused to adhere, shell layers on the surface of the respective cores; and removing, after the shell layers are formed, the preliminary external additive from the surface of each of the cores to obtain a plurality of toner particles.
The following describes an embodiment of the present disclosure.
A toner according to the present embodiment is a capsule toner for developing an electrostatic charge image. For example, the toner according to the present embodiment is appropriately usable as a positively chargeable toner for developing an electrostatic charge image. The toner according to the present embodiment is a powder formed from a large number of particles (hereinafter, referred to as toner particles). The toner may be used as one-component developer. Alternatively, the toner may be mixed with a carrier by using a mixer (for example, ball mill) to prepare a two-component developer. The toner according to the present embodiment is usable in an electrophotographic apparatus (an image forming apparatus), for example.
The following explains an example of a method of forming an image by an electrophotographic apparatus. First, based on image data, an electrostatic charge image is formed on a photosensitive member. Next, the electrostatic charge image thus formed is developed with a developer containing a toner. In the developing process, the electrically charged toner is caused to adhere to the electrostatic charge image. The toner adhere to the electrostatic charge image is transferred onto a transfer belt and is subsequently transferred from the transfer belt onto a recording medium (for example, paper). Then, the toner is fixed to the recording medium by heating. Through the above, an image is formed on the recording medium. A full-color image can be formed through superposition of toner images of four different colors, namely black, yellow, magenta, and cyan colors, for example.
The following explains configuration of the toner (in particular, of the toner particles) according to the present embodiment with reference to
As illustrated in
The core 11 contains a binder resin 11a and one or more internal additives 11b (for example, a colorant and/or a releasing agent). The core 11 is covered by the shell layer 12. An external additive 13 adheres to the surface of the shell layer 12. In the following explanation, toner particles prior to the adhesion of the external additive are referred to as toner mother particles. In addition, toner particles from which the external additive adhering thereto is removed are also referred to as toner mother particles. A material for forming the shell layers are referred to as a shell material.
The toner particle 10 may be without the internal additives 11b or the external additive 13 if unnecessary. Also, the toner particle 10 may have a plurality of shell layers 12 stacked on the surface of the core 11.
With reference to
The shell layer 12 has a plurality of cavities 12a. Each cavity 12a extends through the shell layer 12, thereby exposing the core 11. In the following explanation, a region where the core 11 is exposed is referred to as a region R0 (See
The surface hardness distribution (more specifically, the force curve indicating the surface hardness) of the toner particle 10 (toner mother particle) is measured in the state where the external additive 13 does not adhere to the toner particle 10, by using a scanning probe microscope (SPM). The surface hardness distribution of the toner mother particle is measured on each of a plurality of regions each having an area of 1 μm2 (1 μm×1 μm) as shown in
The following explains one example of the method of removing the external additive 13 from the shell layers 12 by using an ultrasonic cleaner. First, the toner particles 10 are dispersed in ethanol or an aqueous surfactant solution by using an ultrasonic cleaner. The ultrasonic vibrations separate the external additive 13 from the toner mother particles. Subsequently, the dispersion is subjected to suction filtration through a filter having a pore size of 5 μm. As a result, particles of the external additive 13 pass through the filter, whereas the toner mother particles remain on the filter. Subsequently, the toner mother particles are collected and dried. Then, the surface of the toner mother particles is observed under an electron microscope. If the external additive 13 is not sufficiently removed, the above processes of dispersion, filtration, and drying are repeated until the external additive 13 are sufficiently removed.
To measure the surface hardness distribution of a toner mother particle, the hardness of a region R0 (where the core 11 is exposed through a cavity 12a) is measured by using a scanning probe microscope. Hereinafter, the hardness of the region R0 is denoted as a surface hardness Ss. Note that the surface hardness Ss may be an arithmetic mean of a plurality of values of the hardness measured at a plurality of locations in the region R0. The number of measurement values used to calculate the surface hardness Ss can be any number sufficient to reduce measurement error to a negligible level. The measurement accuracy increases with an increasing number of measurement locations.
To measure the surface hardness distribution of a toner mother particle, in addition, the hardness at a location where none of the cavities 12a is present is measured as the surface hardness Sh by using a scanning probe microscope. Note that the surface hardness Sh may be an arithmetic mean of a plurality of values of the hardness measured at a plurality of locations in a region where none of the cavities 12a is present. The number of measurement values used to calculate the surface hardness Sh can be any number sufficient to reduce measurement error to a negligible level. The measurement accuracy increases with an increasing number of measurement locations.
The surface hardness Sh, which is a hardness of a surface region of a toner mother particle where none of the cavities 12a is present, is preferably at least 1.10 times and no greater than 1.50 of the surface hardness Ss.
To measure the surface hardness distribution of a toner mother particle, in addition, a 1 μm2 region (of the surface of the toner particle 10) is scanned by a scanning probe microscope to successively measure the hardness on the substantially entire 1 μm2 region (more specifically, force curve indicating the hardness). In the following description, the hardness measured at each measurement location is denoted as Sm.
With reference to the data obtained about the hardness (surface hardness Ss and Sm), the 1 μm2 region is divided into a region where the hardness is less than 1.10 times the surface hardness Ss (hereinafter, referred to as a region R1) and a region where the hardness is at least 1.10 times the surface hardness Ss (hereinafter, referred to as a region R2). The surface hardness of a toner particle 10 is assumed to increase with an increasing thickness of the shell layer 12. Consequently, the region R2 is assumed to correspond to where the shell layer 12 exceeds a given thickness (a region satisfying Sm/Ss≧1.10), as shown in
Subsequently, based on the data obtained about hardness (surface hardness Ss and Sm), the area (μm2) of the region R2 is calculated. Then, the area ratio of the region R2 within the 1 μm2 square region (1 μm2 area) is calculated by the following formula.
Area Ratio(%) of Region R2=(Area of Region R2/1)×100
The area ratio S representing the surface hardness distribution of the toner particle 10 is calculated from the area ratio of the region R2. In one example, the area ratio of a region R2 is calculated for each of a plurality of 1 μm2 regions (for example, 10 regions spreading across the surface of the toner particle 10), and the area ratio S is an arithmetic mean of the plurality of area ratios (for example, 10 measurement values) calculated for the respective regions R2. Note that the number of measurement values used to calculate the area ratio S can be any number sufficient to reduce measurement error to a negligible level. The measurement accuracy increases with an increasing number of measurement locations.
A toner according to the present embodiment includes toner particles 10 each of which has the area ratio S of at least 75% and no greater than 95% (hereinafter, each of such a toner particle 10 is referred to as a toner particle 10 conforming to the present embodiment). Each toner particle 10 conforming to the present embodiment has a shell layer 12 that is provided with lower-strength portions occupying an appropriate proportion of the shell layer 12. This ensures the shell layers 12 to have an appropriate level of strength (or fragility). In addition, a toner including the toner particles 10 conforming to the present embodiment is excellent in both preservability and fixability (see Tables 2 and 3). To improve both the preservability and fixability of a toner, preferably at least 80% by number, more preferably at least 90% by number, and most preferably 100% by number of all toner particles included in the toner are toner particles 10 conforming to the present embodiment.
Preferably, the cores 11 are anionic and the shell material is cationic. With the cores 11 being anionic, the cationic shell material can be attracted toward the surface of the cores 11 in the formation of the shell layers 12. More specifically, for example, the shell material which is positively charged in an aqueous medium is attracted toward the cores 11 which are negatively charged in the aqueous medium, forming the shell layers 12 on the surface of the cores 11 through in-situ polymerization, for example. As a result, uniform shell layers 12 can be readily formed on the surface of the cores 11, without the use of a dispersant in order to highly disperse the cores 11 in the aqueous medium.
The cores 11 being aniconic is indicated by that the cores 11 have a negative zeta potential (i.e., less than 0 V) when measured in an aqueous medium adjusted to pH 4 (in the following explanation, the aforementioned zeta potential is referred to simply as a zeta potential at pH 4). In order to increase the bonding strength between the cores 11 and the shell layers 12, the zeta potential of the cores 11 at pH 4 is preferably less than 0 V and the zeta potential of the toner particles 10 at pH 4 is preferably higher than 0 V. Note that in the present embodiment, pH 4 is equivalent to the pH of the aqueous medium during formation of the shell layers 12.
Examples of methods for measuring the zeta potential include an electrophoresis method, an ultrasonic method, and an electric sonic amplitude (ESA) method.
The electrophoresis involves applying an electrical field to a dispersion of particles, causing electrical migration of charged particles in the dispersion, and measuring the zeta potential based on the migration speed. An example of the electrophoresis method is laser Doppler electrophoresis in which migrating particles are irradiated with laser light and the migration speed of the particles is calculated from an amount of Doppler shift of scattered light that is obtained. The laser Doppler electrophoresis is advantageous in that: the particle concentration in the dispersion needs not be high; the number of parameters necessary for calculating the zeta potential is not large; and the speed of electrophoretic migration is detected with high sensitivity.
The ultrasonic method involves irradiating a dispersion of particles with ultrasonic, causing the electrically charged particles in the dispersion to vibrate, and measuring the zeta potential based on an electric potential difference that arises due to the vibrations.
The ESA method involves applying a high frequency voltage to a dispersion of particles, causing the electrically charged particles in the dispersion to vibrate and generate ultrasonic waves. The zeta potential is then calculated from magnitude (intensity) of the ultrasonic waves.
The ultrasonic method and ESA method are advantageous in that the zeta potential can be measured with high sensitivity even when the concentration of the particles in the dispersion is high (for example, exceeding 20% by mass).
With reference mainly to
The cores 11 contain the binder resin 11a. The cores 11 may additionally contain internal additives 11b (a colorant and a releasing agent). Yet, the cores 11 may be without either or both of a colorant and a releasing agent and may contain at least either a charge control agent or a magnetic powder.
The binder resin 11a constitutes a large proportion (for example, at least 85% by mass) of the component of the cores 11. Therefore, the polarity of the binder resin 11a has a significant influence on the overall polarity of the cores 11. When for example the binder resin 11a has an ester group, a hydroxyl group, an ether group, an acid group, or a methyl group, the cores 11 have a strong tendency to be anionic. On the other hand, when for example the binder resin 11a has an amino group, an amine, or an amide group, the cores 11 have a strong tendency to be cationic.
For the binder resin 11a to be strongly anionic, the hydroxyl value (measurement method: JIS K-0070) and the acid value (measurement method: JIS K-0070) of the binder resin 11a are each preferably at least 10 mg KOH/g and more preferably at least 20 mg KOH/g.
The glass transition point Tg of the binder resin 11a is preferably no greater than the curing initiation temperature of the shell material. With the binder resin 11a having such a Tg, the toner can be easily fixed at low temperatures even during high-speed fixing. The curing initiation temperature of thermosetting resins (in particular, a melamine-based resin) is typically on the order of 55° C. Tg of the binder resin 11a is preferably at least 20° C., more preferably at least 30° C. and no greater than 55° C., and particularly preferably at least 30° C. and no greater than 50° C. With the binder resin 11a having a Tg of at least 20° C., the cores 11 are less prone to aggregate during the formation of the shell layers 12.
The softening point Tm of the binder resin 11a is preferably no greater than 100° C., and more preferably no greater than 95° C. With the binder resin 11a having a Tm of no greater than 100° C. (more preferably no greater than 95° C.), the toner can be easily fixed at low temperatures even during high-speed fixing. Furthermore, with the binder resin 11a having Tm of no greater than 100° C. (preferably no greater than 95° C.), the cores 11 are partially softened during a curing reaction of the shell layers 12 caused in the formation of the shell layers 12 on the surface of the cores 11 in the aqueous medium. Consequently, the cores 11 tend to have a spherical shape due to surface tension. Note that Tm of the binder resin 11a may be adjusted by combining a plurality of resins each having a different Tm.
The following explains a method of reading Tg of the binder resin 11a from a heat absorption curve with reference mainly to
The glass transition point Tg of the binder resin 11a can be measured according to the following method. The heat absorption curve of the binder resin 11a can be obtained by using a differential scanning calorimeter (for example, DSC-6220, product of Seiko Instruments Inc.). For example, the obtained heat absorption curve is as shown in
Next, the following explains a method of reading Tm of the binder resin 11a from an S-shaped curve with reference mainly to
The glass transition point Tg of the binder resin 11a can be measured according to the following method. A capillary rheometer (for example, CFT-500D, product of Shimadzu Corporation) may be used to measure the softening point Tm of the binder resins 11a. For example, the binder resin 11a (measurement sample) is placed in the capillary rheometer and the sample is caused to melt flow under specific conditions. As a result, an S-shaped curve of stroke (mm)/temperature (° C.) is obtained. Then, Tm of the binder resin 11a is read from the S-shaped curve obtained. In
The following continues explanation of the binder resin 11a shown in
The binder resin 11a is preferably a thermoplastic resin. Preferable examples of thermoplastic resins that can be used as the binder resin 11a include styrene-based resins, acrylic-based resins, styrene-acrylic-based resins, polyethylene-based resins, polypropylene-based resins, vinyl chloride-based resins, polyester resins, polyamide resins, urethane resins, polyvinyl alcohol-based resins, vinyl ether-based resins, N-vinyl-based resins, and styrene-butadiene based resins. Among the examples listed above, styrene-acrylic-based resins and polyester resins are preferable for improving colorant dispersibility in the toner, chargeability of the toner, and fixability of the toner on a recording medium.
The styrene-acrylic-based resin is a copolymer of a styrene-based monomer and an acrylic-based monomer.
Preferable examples of styrene-based monomers that can be used in preparation of the styrene-acrylic-based resin (binder resin 11a) include styrene, α-methylstyrene, p-hydroxystyrene, m-hydroxystyrene, vinyltoluene, α-chlorostyrene, o-chlorostyrene, m-chlorostyrene, p-chlorostyrene, and p-ethylstyrene.
Preferable examples of acrylic-based monomers that can be used in preparation of the styrene-acrylic-based resin (binder resin 11a) include (meth)acrylic acid, alkyl (meth)acrylates, and hydroxyalkyl (meth)acrylates. Preferable examples of alkyl esters of (meth)acrylic acid include methyl (meth)acrylate, ethyl (meth)acrylate, n-propyl (meth)acrylate, iso-propyl (meth)acrylate, n-butyl (meth)acrylate, iso-butyl (meth)acrylate, and 2-ethylhexyl (meth)acrylate. Preferable examples of hydroxyalkyl esters of (meth)acrylic acid include 2-hydroxyethyl (meth)acrylate, 3-hydroxypropyl (meth)acrylate, 2-hydroxypropyl (meth)acrylate, or 4-hydroxybutyl (meth)acrylate.
A hydroxyl group can be introduced into the styrene-acrylic-based resin by using a monomer having a hydroxyl group (for example, p-hydroxystyrene, m-hydroxystyrene, or hydroxyalkyl (meth)acrylate) during preparation of the styrene-acrylic-based resin. The hydroxyl value of the styrene-acrylic-based resin to be obtained can be adjusted by, for example, appropriately adjusting the amount of the monomer having a hydroxyl group.
A carboxyl group can be introduced into the styrene-acrylic-based resin by using (meth)acrylic acid (monomer) during preparation of the styrene-acrylic-based resin. The acid value of the styrene-acrylic-based resin to be obtained can be adjusted by, for example, appropriately adjusting the amount of (meth)acrylic acid that is used in preparation of the styrene-acrylic-based resin.
When the binder resin 11a is a styrene acrylic-based resin, the styrene acrylic-based resin preferably has a number average molecular weight (Mn) of at least 2,000 and no greater than 3,000 to improve the strength of the cores 11 and the fixability of the toner. The styrene-acrylic-based resin preferably has a molecular weight distribution (i.e., a ratio Mw/Mn of the mass average molecular weight (Mw) relative to the number average molecular weight (Mn)) of at least 10 and no greater than 20. Mn and Mw of the binder resin 11a can be measured by using gel permeation chromatography.
The polyester resin that can be used as the binder resin 11a is obtained through condensation polymerization or condensation copolymerization of a di-, tri-, or higher-hydric alcohol and a di-, tri-, or higher-basic carboxylic acid.
When the binder resin 11a is a polyester resin, preferable examples of alcohols that can be used in preparation of the polyester resin include diols, bisphenols, and tri- or higher hydric alcohols as listed below.
Preferable examples of diols that can be used in preparation of the polyester resin include ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, triethylene glycol, 1,2-propanediol, 1,3-propanediol, 1,4-butanediol, neopentyl glycol, 1,4-butenediol, 1,5-pentanediol, 1,6-hexanediol, 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol, dipropylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, polypropylene glycol, and polytetramethylene glycol.
Preferable examples of bisphenols that can be used in preparation of the polyester resin include bisphenol A, hydrogenated bisphenol A, polyoxyethylenated bisphenol A, and polyoxypropylenated bisphenol A.
Preferable examples of tri- or higher hydric alcohols that can be used in preparation of the polyester resin include sorbitol, 1,2,3,6-hexanetetraol, 1,4-sorbitan, pentaerythritol, dipentaerythritol, tripentaerythritol, 1,2,4-butanetriol, 1,2,5-pentanetriol, glycerol, diglycerol, 2-methylpropanetriol, 2-methyl-1,2,4-butanetriol, trimethylolethane, trimethylolpropane, and 1,3,5-trihydroxymethylbenzene.
When the binder resin 11a is a polyester resin, preferable examples of carboxylic acids that can be used in preparation of the polyester resin include di-, tri-, or higher-basic carboxylic acid.
Preferable examples of di-basic carboxylic acids that can be used in preparation of the polyester resin include maleic acid, fumaric acid, citraconic acid, itaconic acid, glutaconic acid, phthalic acid, isophthalic acid, terephthalic acid, cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid, adipic acid, sebacic acid, azelaic acid, malonic acid, succinic acid, alkyl succinic acids (more specifically, n-butyl succinic acid, isobutylsuccinic acid, n-octylsuccinic acid, n-dodecylsuccinic acid, and isododecylsuccinic acid), and alkenyl succinic acids (more specifically, n-butenyl succinic acid, isobutenylsuccinic acid, n-octenylsuccinic acid, n-dodecenylsuccinic acid, and isododecenylsuccinic acid).
Preferable examples of tri- or higher-basic carboxylic acids that can be used in preparation of the polyester resin include 1,2,4-benzenetricarboxylic acid (trimellitic acid), 1,2,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid, 2,5,7-naphthalenetricarboxylic acid, 1,2,4-naphthalenetricarboxylic acid, 1,2,4-butanetricarboxylic acid, 1,2,5-hexanetricarboxylic acid, 1,3-dicarboxyl-2-methyl-2-methylenecarboxypropane, 1,2,4-cyclohexanetricarboxylic acid, tetra(methylenecarboxyl)methane, 1,2,7,8-octanetetracarboxylic acid, pyromellitic acid, and EMPOL trimer acid.
An ester-forming derivative (an acid halide, an acid anhydride, or a lower alkyl ester) of any of the above-listed di-, tri-, or higher-basic carboxylic acid may be used. Herein the term “lower alkyl” refers to an alkyl group having one to six carbon atoms.
Each of the acid value and the hydroxyl value of the polyester resin can be adjusted by appropriately adjusting the amount of the di-, tri-, or higher-hydric alcohol and the amount of the di-, tri-, or higher-basic carboxylic acid used during preparation of the polyester resin. Note that increasing the molecular weight of the polyester resin tends to decrease the acid value and the hydroxyl value of the polyester resin.
When the binder resin 11a is a polyester resin, the polyester resin preferably has a number average molecular weight (Mn) of at least 1,200 and no greater than 2,000 in order to improve the strength of the cores 11 and the fixability of the toner. The polyester resin preferably has a molecular weight distribution (i.e., a ratio Mw/Mn of the mass average molecular weight (Mw) relative to the number average molecular weight (Mn)) of at least 9 and no greater than 20. Mn and Mw of the binder resin 11a can be measured by using gel permeation chromatography.
The cores 11 may for example contain a colorant as an internal additive 11b. The colorant can be a commonly known pigment or dye selected to match a color of the toner. The amount of the colorant is preferably at least 1 part by mass and no greater than 20 parts by mass relative to 100 parts by mass of the binder resin 11a, and more preferably at least 3 parts by mass and no greater than 10 parts by mass.
The cores 11 may contain a black colorant. The black colorant may for example be carbon black. The black colorant may be a colorant that has been adjusted to a black color by combining colorants such as a yellow colorant, a magenta colorant, and a cyan colorant.
The cores 11 may contain a non-black colorant such as a yellow colorant, a magenta colorant, or a cyan colorant.
Preferable examples of the yellow colorant include condensed azo compounds, isoindolinone compounds, anthraquinone compounds, azo metal complexes, methine compounds, and arylamide compounds. Preferable examples of yellow colorants include C.I. Pigment Yellow (3, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 62, 74, 83, 93, 94, 95, 97, 109, 110, 111, 120, 127, 128, 129, 147, 151, 154, 155, 168, 174, 175, 176, 180, 181, 191, and 194), Naphthol Yellow S, Hansa Yellow G, and C.I. Vat Yellow.
Preferable examples of the magenta colorant include condensed azo compounds, diketopyrrolopyrrole compounds, anthraquinone compounds, quinacridone compounds, basic dye lake compounds, naphthol compounds, benzimidazolone compounds, thioindigo compounds, and perylene compounds. Preferable examples of magenta colorants include C.I. Pigment Red (2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 19, 23, 48:2, 48:3, 48:4, 57:1, 81:1, 122, 144, 146, 150, 166, 169, 177, 184, 185, 202, 206, 220, 221, and 254).
Preferable examples of the cyan colorant include copper phthalocyanine compounds, copper phthalocyanine derivatives, anthraquinone compounds, and basic dye lake compounds. Preferable examples of cyan colorants include C.I. Pigment Blue (1, 7, 15, 15:1, 15:2, 15:3, 15:4, 60, 62, and 66), Phthalocyanine Blue, C.I. Vat Blue, and C.I. Acid Blue.
The cores 11 may contain a releasing agent as an internal additive 11b. The releasing agent is used, for example, to improve the fixability or the offset resistance of the toner. To improve the fixability or offset resistance of the toner, the amount of the releasing agent is preferably at least 1 part by mass and no greater than 30 parts by mass relative to 100 parts by mass of the binder resin 11a, and more preferably at least 5 parts by mass and no greater than 20 parts by mass.
Preferable examples of the releasing agent include: aliphatic hydrocarbon-based waxes, such as low molecular weight polyethylene, low molecular weight polypropylene, polyolefin copolymer, polyolefin wax, microcrystalline wax, paraffin wax, and Fischer-Tropsch wax; oxides of aliphatic hydrocarbon-based waxes, such as polyethylene oxide wax and block copolymer thereof; plant waxes, such as candelilla wax, carnauba wax, Japan wax, jojoba wax, and rice wax; animal waxes, such as beeswax, lanolin, and spermaceti; mineral waxes, such as ozocerite, ceresin, and petrolatum; waxes having a fatty acid ester as major component, such as montanic acid ester wax, and castor wax; and waxes in which a part or all of a fatty acid ester has been deoxidized, such as deoxidized carnauba wax.
The shell layers 12 may essentially consist of a thermosetting resin, may essentially consist of a thermoplastic resin, or may contain both a thermosetting resin and a thermoplastic resin. To improve the high-temperature preservability of the toner, the shell layers 12 preferably contain a thermosetting resin, and more preferably consist essentially of a thermosetting resin. To improve the high-temperature preservability of the toner, at least 80% by mass of the resin contained in the shell layers 12 is the thermosetting resin, more preferably at least 90% by mass of the resin is the thermosetting resin, and particularly preferably 100% by mass of the resin is the thermosetting resin.
To enhance the strength and cationic nature of the shell layers 12, the shell layers 12 preferably contain a nitrogen-containing resin, and more preferably contain at least one resin selected from the group consisting of a melamine resin, a urea resin, and a glyoxal resin. When the shell layers 12 contain nitrogen atoms, the shell layers 12 are readily charged to a positive charge. To enhance the cationic nature, the content of the nitrogen atoms in the shell layers 12 is preferably at least 10% by mass.
Preferable examples of the thermosetting resin contained in the shell layers 12 include melamine resins, urea resins, sulfonamide resins, glyoxal resins, guanamine resins, aniline resins, polyimide resins, and derivatives of any of the aforementioned resins. A polyimide resin contains nitrogen atoms within the molecular framework thereof. Therefore, when the shell layers 12 contain a polyimide resin, the shell layers 12 tend to be strongly cationic. Preferable examples of polyimide resins that can be contained in the shell layers 12 include maleimide-based polymers and bismaleimide-based polymers (for example, amino-bismaleimide polymers and bismaleimide triazine polymers).
In particular, the thermosetting resin contained in the shell layers 12 is preferably a resin produced through polycondensation of an aldehyde (for example, formaldehyde) and a compound having an amino group. Note that a melamine resin is a polycondensate of melamine and formaldehyde. A urea resin is a polycondensate of urea and formaldehyde. A glyoxal resin is a polycondensate of formaldehyde and a reaction product of glyoxal and urea.
The thermosetting resin contained in the shell layers 12 can be prepared by using at least one monomer (shell material) selected from the group consisting of methylol melamine, melamine, methylol urea (for example, dimethylol dihydroxy ethylene urea), urea, benzoguanamine, acetoguanamine, and spiroguanamine. The shell material is preferably a material that dissolves or disperses in water. In addition, a hardening agent or a reaction accelerator may be used in formation of the shell layers 12.
The shell layers 12 preferably have a thickness of at least 1 nm and no greater than 20 nm, and more preferably at least 1 nm and no greater than 10 nm.
With a thickness of no greater than 20 nm, the shell layers 12 can easily rupture during fixing of the toner on a recording medium through application of heat and pressure. This ensures the toner to be fixed to a recording medium at low temperatures. With a thickness of no greater than 20 nm, in addition, the shell layers 12 are restricted from being excessively charged. Consequently, the use of the toner can ensure high-quality images to be formed.
On the other hand, with a thickness of at least 1 nm, the shell layers 12 have an improved strength and may not rupture upon impact or the like during transportation of the toner.
The thickness of the shell layers 12 can be measured by analyzing a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of a cross-section of a toner particle 10 by using commercially available image-analyzing software (for example, WinROOF, product of Mitani Corporation). When the shell layer 12 of one toner particle is not uniform in thickness, the thickness of the shell layer 12 is measured at each of four, substantially equally spaced locations (more specifically, at each of four locations of the shell layer crossed by two straight lines drawn to intersect at right angles at approximately the center of the cross-section). An arithmetic mean of the four measured values of the shell layer thickness is taken as an evaluation value (the thickness of the shell layer 12) for the toner particle.
When the shell layers 12 are cationic (positively chargeable), the presence of a positively chargeable charge control agent in the shell layers 12 can enhance the cationic nature of the shell layers 12.
The external additive 13 is used, for example, to improve the fluidity or handleability of the toner. To improve the fluidity or handleability of the toner, the amount of the external additive 13 is preferably at least 0.5 parts by mass and no greater than 10 parts by mass relative to 100 parts by mass of the toner mother particles, and more preferably at least 2 parts by mass and no greater than 5 parts by mass.
Preferable examples of the external additive 13 include silica particles and particles of a metal oxide (for example, alumina, titanium oxide, magnesium oxide, zinc oxide, strontium titanate, or barium titanate).
In order to improve the fluidity or handleability of the toner, the external additive 13 preferably has a number average primary particle diameter of at least 0.01 μm and no greater than 1.0 μm.
Next, the following explains a method of manufacturing a toner according to the present embodiment. In the method of manufacturing a toner according to the present embodiment, the cores 11 are formed. Subsequently, a preliminary external additive is caused to adhere to the surface of the cores 11. Subsequently, the shell layers 12 are formed on the surface of the cores 11. Subsequently, the preliminary external additive is removed from the surface of the cores 11. If necessary, the external additive 13 may subsequently be caused to adhere to the surface of the shell layers 12.
According to the method of manufacturing a toner described above, the strength (or fragility) of the shell layers 12 is appropriately adjusted by providing breaking points (lower-strength portions) occupying an appropriate proportion of each shell layer 12. As a result, the toner that is excellent in both preservability and fixability can be provided.
In the above-described method of manufacturing a toner, it is preferable that particles of the preliminary external additive are hydrophobic at least at their surfaces, and that the shell layers 12 are hydrophilic. With this method, preferable cavities 12a can be formed in the shell layers 12.
Particles used to prepare the preliminary external additive are preferably hydrophobic particles or particles each having a surface that can be treated to be hydrophobic. When non-hydrophobic particles are used to prepare the preliminary external additive, it is preferable to treat the surface of the particles to be hydrophobic. For example, the surface of the particles can be made hydrophobic by coating with silicone oil. The particles used for preparing the preliminary external additive may be organic particles or inorganic particles.
According to the method of manufacturing a toner described above, the surface hardness distribution of each toner particle 10 can be appropriately adjusted by controlling at least either the particle diameter or the additive amount of the preliminary external additive.
In the formation of the shell layers 12, the cores 11 and a shell material are put into a liquid, for example. Subsequently, the liquid maintained at a predetermined temperature is stirred to cause the shell material to polymerize on the surface of the cores 11. Through the above, the shell layers 12 are formed on the surface of the cores 11.
The method of forming the shell layers 12 preferably enables adjusting the number average particle diameter and the particle diameter distribution of the toner to fall within a desired range. Preferable examples of the method of forming the shell layers 12 include in-situ polymerization, in-liquid curing, and coacervation, among which the in-situ polymerization is more preferable.
A preferable shell material is one that is readily formed into films on the surface of the cores 11 and that facilitates control of the toner aggregation. Preferable examples of the shell material include raw materials (for example, prepolymer or monomer) of melamine-based resins, urea-based resins (for example, urea-resorcin-based resins), urethane-based resins, amide-based resins, olefin-based resins, and gelatin-gum arabic resins. In particular, the raw materials of the melamine-based resins or urea-based resins (for example, urea-resorcin-based resins) are all low in water absorbability and excellent in storage stability. The use of a shell material having low water absorbability can restrict aggregation of the toner (adhesion of the toner particles). In addition, the use of such a shell material reduces change in the average particle diameter and the particle diameter distribution of the toner. In addition, the use of such a shell material can restrict aggregation of the toner during the storage.
A methylolated product, such as methylol melamine (precursor produced through addition reaction of melamine and formaldehyde) or methylol urea (precursor produced through addition reaction of urea and formaldehyde). The methylolated product is readily formed into films on the surface of the cores 11.
A preferable shell material is a material that disperses in water. The method of manufacturing a toner according to the present embodiment involves resinifying the shell material dispersed in an aqueous medium on the surface of the cores 11. In view of this, the use of a shell material having a high affinity for water is preferable. Such a shell material readily disperses in an aqueous medium.
Formation of the shell layers 12 (film formation) is preferably carried out in a liquid (solvent) that dissolves the shell material (for example, a methylolated product). Preferable examples of the solvent include water, methanol, and ethanol. To accelerate the formation of the shell layers 12 (film formation), the liquid temperature for forming methylol melamine or methylol urea into films are preferably at least 40° C. and no greater than 80° C. and more preferably at least 55° C. and no greater than 70° C.
To ensure the shell layers 12 to have a uniform thickness, it is preferable to disperse the cores 11 uniformly in the solvent. In order to improve the dispersibility of the cores 11, a dispersant may be added to the solvent. The amount of the dispersant is preferably no greater than 75 parts by mass relative to 100 parts by mass of the cores 11.
Examples of the dispersant include sodium polyacrylate, polyparavinyl phenol, partially saponified polyvinyl acetate, isoprene sulfonic acid, polyether, isobutylene-maleic anhydride copolymer, sodium polyaspartate, starch, gum arabic, polyvinylpyrrolidone, and sodium lignosulfonate. The dispersants listed above may be used alone or in combination of two or more.
Note that the above-described method of manufacturing a toner may be altered freely in accordance with desired configuration and characteristics of the toner. For example, the process of adding the cores 11 into a solvent may be performed either before or after the process of dissolving the shell material in the solvent. Alternatively, the cores 11 may be added to the solvent together with the shell material. In addition, the shell material may be added to the solvent all at once or in portions. In addition, the toner may be sifted after the external addition process. Also, non-essential processes may be omitted. When no external additive is caused to adhere to the surface of the toner mother particles (when the external addition process is omitted), the toner mother particles correspond to the toner particles. The material for forming the cores 11 (herein referred to as a core material) and the shell material are not limited to the specific compounds mentioned above (such as monomer or the like for forming a resin). For example, a derivative of any of the compounds mentioned above may be used as the core material or the shell material if necessary. Preferably, a large number of toner particles 10 are formed simultaneously in order to manufacture the toner efficiently.
The following explains Examples of the present disclosure. Table 1 shows toners A1-A5, toners B1-B5, toners C1-C5, toners D1-D5, toners E1-E5, toners F1-F5, and toner G (each of which is a toner for developing an electrostatic charge image).
The following sequentially explains, in order, a manufacturing method, an evaluation method, and evaluation results of the toners A1-G. Note that each evaluation result (value indicating shape, physical properties, or the like) for a powder (for example, toner cores, preliminary external additive, external additive, toner mother particles, or toner) is the number average of values measured with respect to an appropriate number of particles unless otherwise stated. In addition, for an evaluation associated with introduction of error, a sufficient number of values for reducing the error to a negligible level are measured, and the arithmetic mean of the thus measured values is used as an evaluation value. Note that the particle diameter of a powder is an equivalent circle diameter of a primary particle (diameter of a circle with equivalent projected area as the particle) unless otherwise stated.
The following explains a method of preparing cores (cores A and B) used for manufacturing the toners A1-G
To prepare the cores A, 100 parts by mass of a binder resin (polyester resin), 5 parts by mass of a releasing agent, and 5 parts by mass of a colorant were mixed by using a mixer (FM mixer FM-10B, product of Nippon Coke & Engineering Co., Ltd.).
The binder resin (polyester resin) was TUFTONE (registered Japanese trademark) NE-410 produced by Kao Corporation. The colorant was REGAL (registered Japanese trademark) 330R (carbon black) produced by Cabot Corporation. The releasing agent was VISCOL (registered Japanese trademark) 660P (polypropylene wax) produced by Sanyo Chemical Industries, Ltd.
Subsequently, the resultant mixture was melt-knead by using a two-screw extruder (PCM-30, product of Ikegai Corp.). Then, the resultant melt-knead was rolled and cooled.
Next, the melt-knead was roughly pulverized by using a mechanical pulverizer (Rotoplex (registered Japanese trademark) 16/8, product of Hosokawa Micron Corporation). The roughly pulverized product was further pulverized into fine particles by using a jet mill (Model-I Super Sonic Jet Mill, product of Nippon Pneumatic Mfg.). Subsequently, the fine particles were classified by using a classifying apparatus (Elbow-Jet EJ-LABO, product of Nittetsu Mining Co., Ltd.). Through the classification, the cores A having a median diameter (volume distribution standard) of 6.5 μm were obtained. The obtained cores A were anionic.
The cores B were prepared by the same method as the cores A except that XPE258 produced by Mitsui Chemicals, Inc. was used instead of TUFTONE NE-410.
The cores for the toners A1-G (cores A or B) were prepared through the above processes. Subsequently, a preliminary external additive was caused to adhere to the surface of the cores. With reference mainly to
In the process of the preliminary external addition, the cores and the preliminary external additive were mixed for 5 minutes by a mixer (FM mixer FM-10B, product of Nippon Coke & Engineering Co., Ltd.) at a rotational speed of 3,500 rpm. Through the above, particles of the preliminary external additive 20 were caused to adhere to the surface of the core 11 as shown in
The particles A, B, and C used as the preliminary external additive were fine particles of polystyrene (organic particles). The particles of the preliminary external additive (particles A, B, and C) each had a hydrophobic surface. The number average primary particle diameter of the cores A was 200 nm. The number average primary particle diameter of the cores B was 400 nm. The number average primary particle diameter of the cores C was 600 nm. The particle diameter of each particle was measured by capturing an image of the particle by using an electron microscope and then analyzing the captured image.
The particles A, particles B, and particles C were prepared by the following method.
A four-necked flask was charged with a styrene monomer produced by Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. and distilled water. Subsequently, nitrogen gas was introduced into the flask to produce a nitrogen atmosphere in the flask.
Subsequently, while the contents of the flask were heated, a polymerization initiator (potassium peroxodisulfate produced by Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.) dissolved in distilled water in advance was added to the flask until the total amount of the contents of the flask reached 500 mL. The amount of the polymerization initiator (potassium peroxodisulfate) added to the flask was 3.83×10−4 mol. Then, the contents of the flask was raised to 70° C. and stirred at a rotational speed of 400 rpm, causing emulsion polymerization (synthesis of particles) at 70° C. for 24 hours. As a result, a dispersion containing fine particles of polystyrene was obtained.
Subsequently, the resultant dispersion was subjected to drying, dehydrating, and vacuum and reduced pressure drying to turn the synthesized particles (polystyrene fine particles) into a dried powder. As a result, the polystyrene fine particles (particles A, B, or C) were obtained.
In the preparation of the polystyrene fine particles, the number average primary particle diameter of the polystyrene fine particles can be adjusted by changing the additive amount of styrene monomer. For example, to prepare the particles A having a number average primary particle diameter of 200 nm, 0.02 mol of styrene monomer was added to the flask. To prepare the particles B having a number average primary particle diameter of 400 nm, 0.05 mol of styrene monomer was added to the flask. To prepare the particles C having a number average primary particle diameter of 600 nm, 0.09 mol of styrene monomer was added to the flask.
In the manner described above, the preliminary external additive was added to the surface of the cores. Subsequently, a shell layer was formed on the surface of each core. With reference to
A three-necked flask having a capacity of 1 L and equipped with a thermometer and a stiffing impeller was set up. The flask was then charged with 500 mL of ion exchanged water and 50 g of sodium polyacrylate (JURYMER (registered Japanese trademark AC-103, product of Toagosei Co., Ltd.). As a result, an aqueous solution of sodium polyacrylate was obtained in the flask.
Subsequently, 100 g of the cores to which having the preliminary external was caused to adhere through the process described above (the cores 11 each in the state shown in
Subsequently, the dispersion of the cores was filtered by using filter paper having a pore size of 3 μm. The filtration separated the cores from the filtrate. Subsequently, the cores were re-dispersed in ion exchanged water. Filtration and re-dispersion of the cores were repeated five times to wash the cores. Next, a suspension of 100 g of the cores in 500 mL of ion exchanged water was prepared in a flask.
Subsequently, 1 g of an aqueous solution of a urea-melamine-formaldehyde cocondensated resin (MIRBANE (registered Japanese trademark) resin SUM-100, product of Showa Denko K.K.; solid content concentration 80% by mass) was added to the flask, and the contents of the flask were stirred to dissolve the shell material in the suspension. Subsequently, the pH of the suspension in the flask was adjusted to 4 through addition of dilute hydrochloric acid to the flask.
Next, the suspension was transferred to a 1 L separable flask. Subsequently, while the contents of the flask were stirred with a stirring blade rotating at a rotational speed of 1,200 rpm, the internal temperature of the flask was raised up to 70° C. and maintained at 70° C. for one hour. Through the above, the cores and the shell material in the flask underwent polymerization reaction. As a result, cationic shell layers were formed from a thermosetting resin on the surface of the cores as shown in
The thickness of the shell layers can be adjusted by changing a ratio of the additive amounts of the cores, the dispersant (for example, an aqueous solution of sodium polyacrylate), and the shell material. For example, the addition of 100 parts by mass of the cores, 50 parts by mass of the dispersant, and 1 part by mass of the shell material is assumed to result in shell layers measuring about 8 nm in thickness.
The shell layers B were formed by the same method as the shell layers A except that 50 g of partially saponified polyvinyl acetate (GOHSENOL (registered Japanese trademark) GM-14L, product of the Nippon Synthetic Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.) was used instead of JURYMER AC-103 and that 1 g of water-soluble methylol melamine (Nikaresin (registered Japanese trademark)S-260, product of Nippon Carbide Industries Co.) was used instead of MIRBANE resin SUM-100.
The shell layers C were formed by the same method as the shell layers A except that the dispersant (JURYMER AC-103) was not used and that 1 g of methylol melamine (Polyfix (registered Japanese trademark) KAM-7, product of Showa Denko K.K.; solid content concentration 80% by mass) was used instead of MIRBANE resin SUM-100.
Once the toner mother particles (toner cores and shell layers) were formed, the dispersion were filtered (subjected to solid-liquid separation) to isolate of the toner mother particles. The toner mother particles were subsequently re-dispersed in ion exchanged water. The washing and the filtration were repeated alternately to wash the toner mother particles. Subsequently, the toner mother particles were dried. As a result of repeated washing (dispersion and filtration), almost none of the dispersant (sodium polyacrylate) remained in or on the surface of the toner mother particles.
In the manner described above, the toner mother particles having the preliminary external additive adhering thereto was obtained. Thereafter, the preliminary external additive 20 was removed from the surface of the cores 11 shown in
The shell layers 12 are firmly bonded to the surface of the respective cores 11 through polymerization reaction. On the other hand, the strength of the bond between the preliminary external additive 20 and the surface of each core 11 is relatively weak. In addition, the shell layers 12 are hydrophilic, whereas the surface of each particle of the preliminary external additive 20 is hydrophobic. That is, the shell layers 12 and the preliminary external additive 20 have a low affinity for one another. This ensures easy removal of the preliminary external additive 20 even after the shell layers 12 are formed. For example, application of a slight external force can cause the preliminary external additive 20 to remove (displace) the preliminary external additive 20 from the surface of the cores 11.
In particular, the preliminary external additive was removed from the surface of the cores by using a TTSP classifier (100TTSP, product of Hosokawa Micron Corporation) at the superfine particle removal (f/f classification) settings of rotating the upper and lower rotors at 10,000 rpm. As a result, cavities 12a were formed in the surface of each toner mother particle as shown in
After the removable of the preliminary external additive in the manner described above, the surface of the cores were observed by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JSM-7600F, a product of JEOL Ltd.). Through the observation, all the particles of the preliminary external additive were confirmed to have been removed.
After the removal of the preliminary external additive (particles A, B, or C), an external additive was caused to adhere to the surface of the toner mother particles.
In particular, 100 parts by mass of the toner mother particle, 1.0 part by mass of fine particles of conductive titanium oxide (EC-100, product of Titan Kogyo, Ltd.), and 0.7 parts by mass of fine particles of hydrophobic silica (RA-200H, product of Nippon Aerosil Co., Ltd.) were mixed for 5 minutes by using a mixer (FM mixer FM-10B, product of Nippon Coke & Engineering Co., Ltd.) at a rotational speed of 3,500 rpm. Through the mixing, the external additive 13 was caused to adhere to the surface of each shell layer 12 as shown in
To prepare each of the toners A1-A5, the cores A and the particles A were used and the shell layers A were formed. In the preparation of the toners A1, A2, A3, A4, and A5, the particles A were added respectively in amounts of 2.00 parts by mass, 2.50 parts by mass, 3.00 parts by mass, 3.50 parts by mass, and 4.00 parts by mass relative to 100 parts by mass of the cores (see Table 1).
To prepare each of the toners B1-B5, the cores A and the particles B were used and the shell layers A were formed. In the preparation of the toners B1, B2, B3, B4, and B5, the particles B were added respectively in amounts of 2.50 parts by mass, 3.00 parts by mass, 3.50 parts by mass, 4.00 parts by mass, and 4.50 parts by mass relative to 100 parts by mass of the cores (see Table 1).
To prepare each of the toners C1-C5, the cores A and the particles C were used and the shell layers A were formed. In the preparation of the toners C1, C2, C3, C4 and C5, the particles C were added respectively in amounts of 3.00 parts by mass, 3.50 parts by mass, 4.00 parts by mass, 4.50 parts by mass, and 5.00 parts by mass relative to 100 parts by mass of the cores (see Table 1).
To prepare each of the toners D1-D5, the cores B and particles B were used and the shell layers A were formed. In the preparation of the toners D1, D2, D3, D4, and D5, the particles B were added respectively in amounts of 2.50 parts by mass, 3.00 parts by mass, 3.50 parts by mass, 4.00 parts by mass, and 4.50 parts by mass relative to 100 parts by mass of the cores (see Table 1).
To prepare each of the toners E1-E5, the cores A and the particles B were used and the shell layers B were formed. In the preparation of the toners E1, E2, E3, E4, and E5, the particles B were added respectively in amounts of 2.50 parts by mass, 3.00 parts by mass, 3.50 parts by mass, 4.00 parts by mass, and 4.50 parts by mass relative to 100 parts by mass of the cores (see Table 1).
To prepare each of the toners F1-F5, the cores A and the particles B were used and the shell layers C were formed. In the preparation of the toners F1, F2, F3, F4, and F5, the particles B were added respectively in amounts of 2.50 parts by mass, 3.00 parts by mass, 3.50 parts by mass, 4.00 parts by mass, and 4.50 parts by mass relative to 100 parts by mass of the cores (see Table 1).
To prepare the toner G the cores A were used and the shell layers A were formed. In the preparation of the toner G, no preliminary external additive was used (the process of preliminary external addition was not performed).
The following explains the evaluation method of the samples (i.e., the toners A1-G).
Toner particles of each sample (one of the toners A1-G) were pressed by using a pressure molding machine to prepare a flake with a thickness of 100 nm. In the case where pressing the toner particles was not possible, the toner particles were embedded in resin, followed by curing to obtain a hardened material. Then, a flake with a thickness of 100 nm was cut out from the hardened material by using an ultra-microtome (EM UC6, product of Leica Microsystems).
Subsequently, the obtained flake was fully dried on a metal screen of at least 100 mesh and no greater than 200 mesh. Then, a cross-sectional image of the flake (in particular, of the core surface) was captured by using a Schottky field emission scanning electron microscope (JSM-7600F, product of JEOL Ltd.) at an accelerating voltage of 30 kV. As a result, a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image was obtained at a predetermined magnification (×100,000). When necessary, the TEM image was observed in greater detail by using TEM-dedicated equipment.
Whether or not a shell layer was formed on the core was determined based on the obtained TEM image. When necessary, the presence of a shell layer was additionally confirmed by using a different method. For example, the presence of a shell layer was confirmed by conducting an alkaline immersion test. The presence of a shell layer was also confirmed by identifying the nitrogen contained in the shell layer by using electron energy loss spectrometer (EELS).
The force curve was measured (mapped) on the surface of a toner mother particle by using a scanning probe microscope (S-image, product of Hitachi High-Tech Science Corporation). Note that the toner mother particle subjected to the measurement was of a sample (one of the toners A1-G) before the external addition. First, the force curve of a 1 μm2 region (1 μm per side) located at the top surface (topmost portion) of the toner mother particle was measured.
Subsequently, the hardness of the toner mother particles was measured at each of 10 locations within a region R0 by using a scanning probe microscope. Then, the arithmetic mean (surface hardness Ss) of all of the hardness values measured in the regions R0 (10 measured values) was calculated. In addition, the surface hardness of the toner particle was measured at each of 10 locations where none of the cavities was present (see
Subsequently, the hardness of the toner mother particles in a 1 μm2 region (the surface hardness Sm) was measured by scanning the 1 μm2 region with a scanning probe microscope.
Subsequently, the area (μm2) of the region R2 (a region where Sm/Ss≧1.10 is satisfied) of the toner particle was calculated based on data obtained about the hardness (surface hardness Ss and Sm). Then, the area ratio (%) of the region R2 within the 1 μm2 square region (1 μm2 area) was calculated by the following formula.
Area Ratio(%) of Region R2=(Area of Region R2/1)×100
In the manner described above, the force curve was measured on a total of ten 1 μm2 (1 μm square) regions and the area ratio (%) of the region R2 was calculated. Then, the arithmetic mean (area ratio S) of all of the area ratios (10 measured values) of the regions R2 was calculated.
In the manner described above, the area ratio S was calculated for a total of 10 toner mother particles of the sample (one of the toners A1-G). The arithmetic mean of all of the thus calculated area rations S (ten measured values) was determined as an evaluation value (area ratio) of the corresponding toner. In the case where the measurement accuracy appeared insufficient for obtaining an accurate surface hardness distribution of the toner particle, more than 10 measured values (area ratio of each region R2) were used to calculate the area ratio S of each toner particle.
First, a plastic container having a capacity of 20 mL was charged with 3 g of a sample (one of the toners A1-G) and left to stand for 12 hours in an environment of a temperature of 23° C. and a humidity of 50% RH to adjust the humidity of the sample. Subsequently, the container was closed with a lid in the environment mentioned above. Subsequently, the hermetically sealed container was placed in a thermostatic chamber set at 60° C. and left to stand for 3 hours. Thereafter, the sample was left to stand at normal temperature for sufficient heat removal. Through the above, an evaluation toner was obtained. Subsequently, the mass of the resultant evaluation toner was measured.
Subsequently, by using a 150-mesh sieve placed in a powder tester, the evaluation toner was sifted for 30 seconds at a vibration level of 2. After the sifting, the mass of the toner remaining in the sieve was measured. The remaining percentage (% by mass) of the toner was calculated, in accordance with the following formula, from the mass of the toner before the sifting and the mass of the toner after the sifting (the mass of the toner remaining in the sieve after the sifting).
Remaining Percentage(% by Mass)=(Mass of Toner After Sifting/Mass of Toner Before Sifting)×100
A remaining percentage of less than 10% by mass was evaluated as Very Good. A remaining percentage of at least 10% by mass and less than 40% by mass was evaluated as Good. A remaining percentage of at least 40% by mass was evaluated as Poor.
A multifunction peripheral (FS-C5100CN, product of KYOCERA Document Solutions Inc.) was used as an evaluation apparatus.
A sample (one of the toners A1-G) was mixed with a developer carrier to prepare a two-component developer such that the concentration of the toner was 10% by mass. The developer carrier was prepared by spraying a solution containing 30 parts by mass of a silicone resin and 200 parts by mass of toluene relative to 1,000 parts by mass of Mn—Mg ferrite cores having a number average primary particle diameter of 35 μm, followed by heat treatment at 200° C. for 60 minutes.
The two-component developer thus prepared was put into the developing device of the evaluation apparatus and the sample (the corresponding one of the toners A1-G) was put into a toner container of the evaluation apparatus.
The evaluation apparatus was then operated to develop 0.4 mg/cm2 of the toner on paper (C2, product of Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.). The amount of the toner was adjusted by changing the developing bias (voltage). Through the above, a 2.0 cm×2.5 cm solid and image was formed unfixed on the paper. Subsequently, while the paper was conveyed at a linear velocity of 170 mm/sec, the unfixed solid image was fixed to the paper by using an externally driven fixing mechanism. The fixing mechanism was prepared by modifying the fixing device of a printer (FS-C5100CN, product of KYOCERA Document Solutions Inc.) to enable external driving of the fixing device and adjustment of fixing temperature. The fixing temperature was set in a range of 100° C. to 150° C. More specifically, a minimum temperature at which the toner (solid image) was fixable to the paper (i.e., a minimum fixing temperature) was measured by gradually increasing the fixing temperature of the fixing mechanism from 100° C. Whether or not the toner was fixed was determined through a fold-rubbing test (i.e., by measuring the length of toner peeling at a fold). In particular, the minimum fixing temperature was measured by the following method.
The fold-rubbing test was performed on paper to which a solid image was fixed. More specifically, the paper was folded in half such that a surface on which the image was formed was folded inwards, and by rubbing a 1 kg weight covered with cloth back and forth on the fold five times. Next, the paper was opened up and a fold portion (i.e., a portion to which the solid image was fixed) was observed. The length of toner peeling of the fold portion (peeling length) was measured. A lowest temperature among temperatures for which the peeling length was no greater than 1 mm was determined to be the minimum fixing temperature.
A minimum fixing temperature of less than 125° C. was evaluated as Good and a minimum fixing temperature of at least 125° C. was evaluated as Poor.
Table 2 summarizes the evaluation results of the area ratio S, surface hardness Sh, and surface hardness Ss (each being an arithmetic mean) measured for each of the toners A1-G. In addition, the “Sh/Ss” column in Table 2 shows values each calculated by dividing the surface hardness Sh by the surface hardness Ss.
Through the observation of TEM images of the respective samples, the toners A1-G were each confirmed to have shell layers formed on the surface of the cores. The shell layers of the toners A1-F5 were provided with cavities. On the other hand, the shell layers of the toner G were without cavities.
For each of the toners A1 to F5, the toner particles were measured to show that the surface hardness Sh at locations where none of the cavities was present was at least 1.10 and no greater than 1.50 times of the surface hardness Ss. The toner particles measured also show that the surface hardness Sh at locations where none of the cavities was present was greater than the surface hardness at a location where any of the cavities was present.
For each of the toners A2-A4, B2-B4, C2-C4, D2-D4, E2-E4, and F2-F4, the area ratio S was at least 75% and no greater than 95%.
For each of the toners A5, B5, C5, D5, E5, and F5, the area ratio S was less than 75% (more specifically, no greater than 60%).
For each of the toners A1, B1, C1, D1, E1, F1, and G the area ratio S exceeded 95%.
Table 3 summarizes the evaluation results of the low-temperature fixability and high-temperature preservability of each of the toners A1-G
For each of the toners A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, C2, D1, D2, E1, E2, F1, F2, and U, the remaining percentage was less than 10% by mass. For each of the toners A3, A4, B3, B4, C3, C4, D3, D4, E3, E4, F3, and F4, the remaining percentage was at least 10% by mass and less than 40% by mass. For each of the toners A5, B5, C5, D5, E5, and F5, the remaining percentage was at least 40%.
For each of the toners A2-A5, B2-B5, C2-05, D2-D5, E2-E5, and F2-F5, the minimum fixing temperature was less than 125° C. For each of the toners A1, B1, C1, D1, E1, F1, and G, the lowest fixing temperature was at least 125° C. (more specifically, at least 138° C.).
As has been described above, the toners A2-A4, B2-B4, C2-C4, D2-D4, E2-E4, and F2-F4 (hereinafter, referred to as the toners of the present Examples) each satisfy the following with respect to a surface hardness distribution, which is a distribution of surface hardness of each toner particle (toner mother particle) as measured by a scanning probe microscope in a state where no external additive adheres thereto. That is, the surface hardness was at least 1.10 times the surface hardness Ss in at least 75% and no greater than 95% by area ratio of the toner particle (toner mother particle).
In addition, the toners of the present Examples all resulted in the minimum fixing temperature of less than 125° C. and the remaining percentage of less than 40% by mass. The toners of the present Examples were excellent in both the fixability and high-temperature preservability.
According to the method of manufacturing the toners of the present Examples, cores were formed first. Subsequently, a preliminary external additive was caused to adhere to the surface of the cores. Subsequently, shell layers were formed on the surface of the cores. Subsequently, the preliminary external additive was removed from the surface of the cores. Subsequently, an external additive was caused to adhere to the surface of the shell layers.
Each shell layer was thinner at a location where any of the cavities was present thus prone to rupture at such a location. This leads to the assumption that a toner having excellent fixability and high-temperature preservability can be provided by controlling the number of cavities so as to occupy an appropriate proportion of each shell layer. The methods of manufacturing the toners of the present Examples each involved the use of a preliminary external additive. The use of a preliminary external additive allows easy control of the number of cavities (and thus the surface hardness distribution of each toner particle).
In each method of manufacturing the toners of the present Examples, the surface hardness distribution of each toner particle was adjusted by controlling the particle diameter and the additive amount of the preliminary external additive. Such a method is assumed enable the surface hardness distribution of each toner particle to be adjusted easily and appropriately to fall within a desired range.
The present disclosure is not limited to Examples described above.
As long as a toner satisfies that the surface hardness of each toner particle is at least 1.10 times the surface hardness Ss in at least 75% and no greater than 95% by area ratio of the surface of the toner particle, the toner is expected to be excellent in both the preservability and fixability.
When a method of manufacturing a toner involves: forming cores; causing a preliminary external additive to adhere to a surface of the cores; forming, after the preliminary external additive is caused to adhere, shell layers on the surface of the respective cores; and removing the preliminary external additive from the surface of the cores, the number of cavities (and thus the surface hardness distribution of each toner particle) can be readily controlled.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-012347 | Jan 2014 | JP | national |
