(1) Field of the Invention
The invention is related to the handling of covers, namely of sewer or road-manhole covers, or the like. It relates in particular to a tool for handling such covers, which can be referred to as a cover lifter, which should enable an operator to remove such a cover, in order to have access to the manhole or to the sewer, then to re-place it after the inspection.
The invention also relates to a method for removing and re-placing a sewer or road-manhole cover using the cover lifter according to the invention.
(2) Description of the Prior Art
In the field of the tools for handling such covers, tools with hooks have since long been developed, which permit to take hold of the cover at a point of the cover in order to take hold of it with such hooks. Nevertheless, the covers are heavy, up to 70 kg, and their lifting is difficult, even if it is carried out by two persons. Furthermore, the covers are often jammed in their recess, by small stones or tar, which have been introduced into the gaps between the cover and its recess.
EPO 484 285 discloses a tool for handling covers including such a hook, a fulcrum, and a handle, thus permitting to gear down the force for separating the cover. Nevertheless, this tool provides no solution for an efficient removal of the cover, nor for its displacement to one side.
EP2 702 753 discloses a tool for handling covers, also with a hook, a fulcrum and a handle. The tool disclosed in this document permits in a first phase the separation of the cover from its recess (
U.S. Pat. No. 7,544,035 discloses a tool for handling covers with a hook and with a magnet. Two magnets are placed on the cover, then a bar with hooks is arranged so as to take hold of the two magnets, and the hook of the tool takes hold of the bar, in order to lift it. Nevertheless, if the magnets are not placed accurately on both sides of the center of gravity of the cover, it is highly likely that the latter tilts during the lifting.
There is thus a need for finding a solution permitting to facilitate the handling of such covers. With the tools of the state of the art, it could indeed be observed that about 20% of the operators have suffered from work accidents, namely with back troubles, or entrapment of fingers.
The present invention pretends to cope at least partially with the cited drawbacks and namely to make possible the removal and re-placing of a cover by one single operator, without requiring any accuracy in the positioning of the tool.
To this end, the invention relates to a tool for handling a cover including a substantially planar upper face, namely sewer or vent or road-manhole covers, including a means for holding a cover defining a plane aimed at cooperating with the upper face of said cover, a lifting fulcrum, and a handle provided with an end spaced apart from said lifting fulcrum, said holding means, fulcrum and handle being arranged so that a force exerted by an operator at the level of said end is transmitted as a force at the level of the holding means by means of said lifting fulcrum.
Said holding means is rigid in the vicinity of said plane, in order to impede any rotation of the cover about an axis included in said plane.
By impeding any rotation of the cover about an axis included in said plane, the tool permits, on itself, to lift the cover, while guaranteeing that the cover remains substantially horizontal. In this way is avoided the tilting of the cover, which could cause an impact on the tool, and which would in addition oblige to lift the cover much higher, in order to permit its displacement to a side of the opening in order to lay it down and to permit the access to the manhole or to the sewer. Since the cover remains horizontal, it is enough to lift it by some ten centimeters, then to displace it, and to lay it down next to the manhole.
Such rigid holding means in the vicinity of said plane can be a substantially vertical rod, and a substantially horizontal board rigidly fixed to said rod; the fastening of the cover to the board can occur by any means available for the specialist: glue, clamps, hooks, and yet other means.
According to further features:
The invention also relates to a method for removing a cover, as well as to a method for re-placing a cover.
The advantage resulting from the present invention resides in that the removal and the re-placing are largely facilitated, and become possible with one single tool and one single operator.
Further features and advantages of the invention will become clear from the following detailed description, which refers to an exemplary embodiment given as an indication and in a non-restrictive way.
This description will be more easily understood when referring to the attached drawings.
As shown in
At the end of the tool leg 3 is arranged a permanent magnet 6 accommodated, in resting position, in a protective box 7. The latter serves, on the one hand, for protecting the permanent magnet 6 from scratches it might be subjected to during the displacements of the tool 1, on the other hand, for avoiding the permanent magnet 6 from being caught on metallic objects such as trucks or loading buckets that may be in the vicinity of the covers to be removed or re-placed. Furthermore, the protective box 7 avoids the magnet 6 from drawing small metallic objects that may be present on the road, such as nails, screws or clips.
At an end of the framework 2 is arranged an extension 8, at the end of which an axis 9 provided with two wheels 10 permits a fulcrum for the tool 1, easily movable in translation thanks to the wheels 10. The tool 1 may also be carried out without such wheels, the extension 8 resting directly on the ground, in order to form a fulcrum 8. In this case, the horizontal displacement shall occur either by causing the fulcrum 8 to slide or by causing the tool 1 to rotate about this fulcrum 8, in order to be able to place the cover 22 next to the manhole to be opened. With the wheels 10, both the translation and the rotation are largely facilitated. On a tool 1 according to the invention can be provided an extensible axis 9 that permits to move the two wheels 10 apart from each other, so that the two wheels 10 pass, one of them on one side, the other one on the other side of the cover 22. This way they do not roll on the cover 22 at all, which permits to pass over the opening even when the cover 22 is removed.
At the opposite end of the framework 2 with respect to the extension 8 is arranged a handle 11, at the end of which a traverse bar 12 and two grips 13 permit a good manual grip of the handle 11. The handle 11 may also be provided with only one grip 13 at the end 11b of the handle 11. This can be a round, square, polygonal, hollow or not, tube, or a tube of any other shape. According to an alternative, not shown, the handle 11 of the tool 1 may be reinforced, for example by inserting a bar having a rhombic cross-section into the hollow tube.
This handle 11 is fastened to the framework 2 in a telescopic way: it can slide along the framework 2 (see
When a lifting force is applied by the operator's hands at the level of the grips 13, this force results, at the level of the framework 2, into a torque, to which the framework 2 reacts by a resistance to an upward force at the level of the end hoop 14a, and a resistance to a downward force at the level of the end 11a of the handle 11 opposite the grips 13. In order to avoid said downward force at the level of the end 11a from prematurely damaging the sheet 16 at this location, a pin 18 is arranged in a drilled hole provided to this end at various positions along the framework 2, on which the end 11a of the handle 11 then rests. Said end 11a can also be provided with an appropriate shape that matches the shape of the pin 18 and partially surrounds it. Thus, this pin 18 accomplishes a second function, which is that of impeding the handle 11 from protruding fully out of the framework 2 in working position, or at least from going beyond the limit for which the forces received by the framework 2 and the handle 11 remain acceptable.
At the level of the extension 8, a rear grip 19 is arranged on the framework 2, the function of which will be specified below.
The operation of the tool 1 is then as follows:
The handle 11 is then first of all used alone, extracted from the framework 2 (see
The handle 11 is then brought into a stretched position, the more stretched as a large lever arm is thought to be needed. The grips 13 can be mounted removably on the handle 11, in this case on the traverse bar 12, by means of a threaded rod arranged on the grips 13, which inserts into a tapped hole provided for in said traverse bar 12, washers 24 being inserted between said grips 13 and said traverse bar 12. When the grips 13 are not used, for example while the handle 11 is used alone, the grips 13 can be stored in two receptacles 27 provided to this end in the protective box 7 of the magnet 6.
The tool leg 3 is arranged on the framework 2 by means of a drilled hole 5 that is located the closer to the extension 8 forming a fulcrum 10 as the force to be applied seems more important. The closer this tool leg 3 is fixed to the fulcrum 10, the higher will be the force applied on the cover 22 for a given force applied at the level of the grips 13, but the shorter will be the lifting distance for a lifting distance conferred at the level of the grips 13. Thus, when a light, but thick cover 22 must be removed (for example a vent grid), it will be convenient to choose a position farther away from the fulcrum 10. While, when the cover 22 is heavier, a position closer to the fulcrum 10 should be chosen.
The magnet 6 is then extracted from its box 7 (see
The tool 1 is then positioned above the cover 22 to be removed, and the magnet 6 is brought into contact with said cover 22 (see
This position close to the center needs not be reached accurately. It is indeed obvious that, when the magnet 6 is positioned at the edge of the cover 22, there will be an unbalance, and the cover 22 will be lifted only at the side where the magnet 6 will be positioned. On the other hand, it is enough to be positioned very approximately in the center of the cover 22 for the balance of the cover 22 to occur naturally.
Indeed, in the state-of-the-art solutions, when the cover 22 is hooked by means of a hook, it rotates freely about this hook, and the horizontal position of the cover 22 represents a very instable point of balance. By contrast, with a holding means 3 according to the invention, configured for impeding any rotation of the cover 22 about an axis included in a plane corresponding to the plane of the cover 22, the latter cannot tilt.
This is shown in particular in
When the magnet 6 is positioned somewhat away from the center of the cover 22, the balance will be found in a position in which the cover 22 is not perfectly horizontal, but it will still be a stable balance close to the horizontal position. A perfectly satisfactory operation of the tool has been observed with the magnet located at one third of the radius of the cover 22, with at least twice as much cover weight on one side of the magnet as on the other side.
The fastening of the tool leg 3 to the framework 2 could also be made rigid; this would provide the cover 22 with a forced position, which would also be close to the horizontal line.
The advantage of letting this fastening freely rotate about the point of hooking to the framework 2 is that, while preserving the advantage of a stable balance without accurate positioning, it avoids, on the one hand, inducing additional stresses on the framework 2, and thus increases its lifetime and, on the other hand, it avoids increasing the force the operator must maintain in order to hold the cover 22 in raised position.
The next step consists in displacing the cover 22, in order to place it next to the opening, in order to make it free and to be able to have access to it. In the embodiment shown, the wheels 10 largely facilitate this displacement.
The operator can then lower the tool 1 until the plate 22 rests on the ground.
The tool 1 can then be separated from the cover 22 according to the method explained below, or remain united with the cover 22 until the moment at which the cover 22 must be re-placed.
When the cover 22 must be re-placed, the operator lifts the cover 22, like during the removal, positions it above the opening, then lowers it until it is in place.
Now remains to separate the magnet 6 from the cover 22. Now, the force applied by the magnet 6 is high, in order to guarantee its capacity of lifting the cover 22, despite the frictions in the opening at the moment of the removal. This force is therefore considerably higher than the weight of the cover 22. The lever arm between the grips 13 and the lifting fulcrum 10, which is in the range of twice that between the force of the magnet 6 on the cover 22 and the lifting fulcrum 10 in the example shown, is then not sufficient to separate the magnet 6 from the cover 22.
A rod 21 has been inserted into the tool leg 3. This rod 21 extends downwards until through the magnet 6, and upwards until the sheet 16, when the tool 1 is in the position of
According to another embodiment, the tool leg 3 and the drilled holes 5 in the framework 2 for its fastening can be arranged so that, in <<normal>> raised position of the cover 22 (see
When referring to
When referring to
To open such a cover, the tool is arranged above the cover 30, the magnet 6 being positioned in the area opposite the hinge 31; then the position of the leg 3 is adjusted so as to be able to position the wheels 10 close to the hinge 31, preferably placed on the cover 30. It is then enough to lift the handle 11, which opens the hinged cover 31. In this case, the handle is lifted up to the vertical line, until the tool 1 rests on the ground with its rear grip 19. In this position, the hinged cover 30 has performed a rotation of more than 90° about its hinge 31, and is stable in open position. The closing occurs by means of the reverse movement. Here too, the exact position of the magnet 6 on the area of the cover 30 far away from the hinge 30 does not matter. It will easily be understood that the farthest this position is away from the axis of the hinge 31, the lesser the tool 1 will be stressed, but the force to be applied will be similar. Furthermore, the closer the wheels are positioned to the hinge, the smaller will be the stresses induced into the tool, but here too the force to be applied by the operator will be similar.
According to an alternative shown in
Said rear grip 19 can also be designed movable in rotation about an axis, as shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1060092 | Dec 2010 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR11/52881 | 12/6/2011 | WO | 00 | 6/5/2013 |