In order to describe the manner in which the above-recited and other advantages and features of the invention can be obtained, a more particular description of the invention briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, the invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
A tool according to an implementation of the invention for machining a workpiece is shown in
In the case of the present exemplary embodiment, at the tool head 3 of the tapping tool 1, four lands 4 to 7 are arranged around the centre axis M, said lands 4 to 7 being provided with an external thread, which, however, is not depicted in
The tapping tool 1 is designed according to the invention in such a way that the flutes 9 or the lands 4 to 7 have a left-hand helix with respect to the tool centre axis M. The helix angle γ of a flute 9 is depicted by way of example in
Furthermore, in the case of the present exemplary embodiment, the tapping tool 1 is designed in such a way that the spiral points 8 each have a spiral point skew or a spiral point angle γA of between 5° and 20°, preferably about 8° to 12°, with respect to the centre axis M of the tapping tool 1. In the case of the present exemplary embodiment, the spiral point skew γA is selected to be identical at all the spiral points 8 and is likewise specified with respect to the centre axis M of the tapping tool 1 (cf.
The spiral point inclination λ of each of the spiral points 8 is between 3° and 15° relative to the centre axis M of the tapping tool 1. For a detail of a section through the tapping tool 1 from
A spiral point 8 preferably extends over about one fifth to three quarters of the length of a flute 9, a factor which can be seen from
In addition, in the case of the present exemplary embodiment, the tapping tool 1 has along its tool head 3 various cutting regions provided with the external thread, which are depicted in
Adjoining the first region I is a second region II of thread crests of the external thread, the thread crests arranged in the second region II being full thread crests, that is to say thread crests without widening of the external thread of the tapping tool 1. In the case of the present exemplary embodiment, three full thread crests of the external thread are arranged in the second region II. Finally, adjoining the second region II is a third region III, in which, starting from the second region II, the thread crests are widened again in the direction of the tool shank 2 of the tapping tool 1, the widening increasing in the direction of the tool shank 2 starting from the second region II. That region of the tool head 3 which adjoins the third region III is therefore smaller in maximum diameter than the second region II.
As can be seen in particular from
Furthermore, in order to explain the structure of the tapping tool 1, four sections VII to X are depicted in
As can be seen from
Starting from the end face of the tool head 3, the cross-sectional area of each land 4 to 7 also increases in the direction of the tool shank 2, wherein the land width or tooth width Zb of each land 4 to 7 also increases. Depicted by way of example in
The above-described configuration of the tapping tool 1 can also be seen from the plan views as shown in
On account of its structure, the above-described tapping tool 1 is especially suitable for machining through-holes made of higher-strength steels or for machining through-holes at high speed. In this case, the chips produced by the thread crests of the external thread of the tapping tool 1 during the machining of a through-hole are brought out forwards, i.e. out of the through-hole. For “lost” chips, that is to say chips which do not move forwards, the flutes 9 provided with a left-hand helix are provided for the disposal of the chips.
The above-described structure of a tool according to the invention, in particular of a tapping tool according to the invention, should only be understood by way of example and may also be designed differently within the scope of the invention. Thus, the tapping tool may have less than four lands, but may also have more than four lands. In particular, the tapping tool may have three or five lands. The lands may be arranged with equal or with unequal pitch around the centre axis M. The specifications of the helix angle of the flutes, of the spiral point skew and of the rake angles relate in this case to the respective peripheral cutting edge of a land, all the lands being of essentially identical design.
In contrast to the exemplary embodiment described, the tool may also have one or more flutes with a right-hand helix to which a spiral point or spiral points are assigned which are designed to skew to the right. A tapping tool of such a design is preferably intended for producing left-hand threads.
Apart from that, angular settings different from those described above in connection with the present exemplary embodiment, for example for the helix angle, the spiral point skew, the spiral point inclination and/or the rake angle, can be selected within the scope of the invention.
The same applies to the number of thread crests in the regions I to III and for the selection of the length of the spiral point. The tapping tool also need not necessarily have three regions I to III of this kind, as described above.
The dimensioning of the tapping tools per se is selected in each case, as a function of the workpieces to be machined or of the through-holes to be machined. The thread profile angles in this case are preferably between 50° and 70° and the thread flank angles between 25° and 35°.
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 044 575.9 | Sep 2006 | DE | national |