The invention relates to surfacing optical surfaces.
By surfacing is meant any operation aiming to modify the surface state of a previously fashioned optical surface. This means in particular operations of polishing, grinding or frosting aiming to modify (reduce or increase) the roughness of the optical surface and/or to reduce the unevenness thereof.
There is already known a tool for surfacing an optical surface that includes a rigid support having a transverse end surface, an elastically compressible interface that is pressed against and covers said end surface, and a flexible pad adapted to be pressed against the optical surface and that is pressed against and covers at least part of the interface on the opposite side of and in line with said end surface.
To reduce the roughness of the optical surface, the tool is brought into contact with the latter, maintaining sufficient pressure of the tool on it for the pad to espouse the shape of the optical surface through deformation of the interface.
While spraying the optical surface with a fluid, it is driven in rotation relative to the tool (or vice-versa) and it is swept by means of the latter.
It is generally the optical surface that is driven in rotation, its rubbing against the tool being sufficient to drive the latter in rotation conjointly.
The surfacing operation necessitates an abrasive which can be contained in the pad or in the fluid.
During surfacing, the elastically compressible interface compensates the curvature difference between the end surface of the support of the tool and the optical surface, so that the same tool is adapted to a range of optical surfaces with different curvatures and shapes.
French patent application 2 834 662, which corresponds to American patent application 2005/0101235, proposes a surfacing tool of this kind which, whilst being adapted to a sufficiently vast range of optical surfaces, in terms of curvatures (convexity, concavity) and shapes (spherical, toric, aspherical, progressive or any combination of the latter, or more generally “freeform”), has good stability during surfacing and provides reliable and fast surfacing of good quality.
One embodiment of the tool proposed by the above document is described hereinafter with reference to
In
The tool 1 is formed of a stack of at least three parts, namely a rigid part 4, an elastically compressible part 5, and a flexible part 6 which, hereinafter, will respectively be called the support, the interface and the pad.
As is apparent in
As can be seen in
The normal to the optical surface 2 at the point of intersection of the axis of symmetry X of the tool 1 therewith is denoted n.
On the side opposite its face 12 in which the hole 11 is formed, the lower jaw 7 has an end surface 13 extended substantially transversely, against which the interface 5 is pressed, covering it.
The pad 6 is pressed against the interface 5 on the other side of the latter relative to the support 4.
More precisely, the pad 6 covers at least part of the interface 5 on the opposite side to and in line with the end surface 13.
The rubbing of the pad 6 against the optical surface 2 ensures, by means of an abrasive contained in the spray fluid or incorporated into the pad 6 itself, superficial removal of material on the optical surface 2 in order to modify the surface state, as will emerge hereinafter.
The pad has a central portion 6a that is in line with the end surface 13 and a peripheral portion 14 which is located transversely beyond the end surface 13.
This peripheral portion 14 is connected to the support 4 by spring return means 15.
The peripheral portion 14 is in line with the central portion 6a and, when at rest, is substantially coplanar with it.
In the example shown in
In an embodiment represented in bold line in
In a variant represented in chain-dotted line in
In this case, in the absence of any load, the pad 6, if it is in one piece, is in the shape of a disc of material whose thickness is small compared to its diameter, as shown in
The return means 15, which will be described later, can be disposed directly between the support 4 and the peripheral portion 14 of the pad 6, i.e. in practice the flange 14a or the petals 14b.
The interface 5 has not only a central portion 5a that is located in line with the end surface 13 but also a peripheral portion 16 that is transversely beyond the end surface 13.
This peripheral portion 16 is in line with the central portion 5a and, in the absence of any load, is in the shape of a ring that surrounds the central portion 5a, for example, and is in fact disposed between the peripheral portion 14 of the pad 6 and the return means 15.
As can be seen in
Thus in the absence of any load the one-piece interface 5 is in the shape of a disc of material whose thickness is small compared to its transverse dimension (i.e. its diameter), for example.
When the interface 5 and the pad 6 are both in one piece, they have comparable transverse dimensions. In particular, when each is in the form of a disc of material, for constructive convenience they are preferably the same diameter. However, there could equally be provision for using a pad of different diameter to that of the interface, in particular a greater diameter in order to attenuate edge effects of the tool on the worked surface.
Moreover, for reasons that will become apparent hereinafter, a deformable ring 17 is provided, disposed between the peripheral portion 16 of the interface 5 and the return means 15.
In practice, this ring 17 is fixed to the peripheral portion 16 on the other side of the latter to the pad 6, i.e. on the same side as the support 4, and so that the latter is surrounded by the ring 17.
This ring 17 preferably has a circular longitudinal section, but it could equally have a section of more complex shape, in particular oblong, polygonal, rectangular or square shape. Moreover, it is disposed on the peripheral portion 16 concentrically with the support 4.
The return means 15 is described next.
It comprises at least one elastically flexible leaf 18 that projects transversely from the support 4 and is connected, on the one hand, rigidly, to the support 4 by a first end 18a and, on the other hand, to the peripheral portion 14 of the pad 6 by a second end 18b, called the free end, opposite the first end 18a.
As a result, the effect of a force exerted longitudinally on the peripheral portion 14 in line with this leaf 18 is that the latter is deformed, exerting on the peripheral portion 14 a reaction opposite to said force.
In practice, the return means 15 include a plurality of such leaves 18, distributed uniformly at the periphery of the support 4, to act on the whole of the peripheral portion 14 of the pad 6.
The return means 15 in fact take the form of a star-shaped part 19 fixed rigidly to the support 4.
The star-shaped part 19 has a central portion 20 from which project a plurality of branches 18 each forming an elastically flexible leaf extended radially in a transverse plane.
For fixing the star-shaped part 19 to the support 4, its central portion 20 is in practice clamped between the jaws 7, 8 of the support 4, it being centered by means of a through-hole 21 produced at its center, through which passes the peg 9 of the upper jaw 8, the assembly being held by fixing means such as screws which, passing through the upper jaw 8 and the central portion 20 of the star-shaped part 19, are engaged in the lower jaw 7.
If, as in an embodiment previously described, the one-piece pad 6 has a plurality of petals 14b, there are provided on the star-shaped part 19 as many branches 18 as there are petals 14b, the star-shaped part 19 being oriented so that each branch 18 extends in line with a petal 14b. Thus if the pad 6 has seven petals 14b, the star-shaped part 19 has seven branches 18 each adapted to provide the return spring force for one petal 14b.
The ring 17 is fixed to the interface 5, which fixing can be provided by any means, although gluing is preferred, in particular for its simplicity.
In the embodiment represented, the diameters of the interface 5, the pad 6 and the star-shaped part 19 have a value at least twice that of the diameter of the support 4.
Moreover, when it is a question of surfacing an ophthalmic lens, the diameters of the interface 5 and the pad 6 are chosen to be substantially equal to the diameter of the lens 3, with the result that the diameter of the support 4 is much less than the diameter of the lens 3.
The use of the tool 1 is illustrated in
In this instance it is a question of surfacing or grinding an aspherical convex face 2 of an ophthalmic lens.
The lens 3 is mounted on a rotary support (not shown) by means of which it is driven in rotation about a fixed axis Y.
The tool 1 is pressed against this face 2 with sufficient force for the pad 6 to espouse its shape. Here the tool 1 is free to rotate and off-center relative to the optical surface 2. Forced driving of the tool in rotation by appropriate means can nevertheless be provided.
The relative rubbing of the optical surface 2 and the pad 6 is sufficient to drive the tool 1 in rotation in the same direction as the lens 3 about an axis substantially coincident with the axis of symmetry X of the support 4.
The optical surface 2 is sprayed with a non-abrasive or abrasive spray fluid according to whether the pad exercises this function itself or not.
In order to sweep the whole of the optical surface 2, the tool 1 is moved during surfacing along a radial trajectory, the point of intersection of the rotation axis X of the tool 1 with the optical surface 2 effecting a to and fro movement between two turnaround points, namely an exterior turnaround point A and an interior turnaround point B both situated at a distance from the rotation axis Y of the lens 3.
The central portion 6a of the pad 6 is deformed to espouse the shape of the optical surface 2 thanks to the compressibility of the central portion 5a of the interface 5.
As for the peripheral portion 14 of the pad 6, it is deformed to espouse the shape of the optical surface 2 thanks to the deformation of the flexible leaves 18.
Given the rigidity of the support 4, material is removed for the most part in line with the end surface 13, i.e. this removal of material is effected essentially by the central portion 6a of the pad 6.
As for the peripheral portions 14 of the pad 6 and 16 of the interface 5, they have essentially a stabilizing role, on the one hand thanks to the increased span or seat of the tool 1 compared to a standard tool the pad and the interface whereof would be limited to the central portions 5a, 6a and, on the other hand, thanks to the return means 15 that maintain a permanent contact between the peripheral portion 14 of the pad 6 and the optical surface 2.
The deformable ring 17 smoothes the distribution of the load exerted on the peripheral perimeter of the interface 5 and therefore on the pad 6 by the leaves 18.
As a result of this, whatever the location of the tool 1 on the optical surface 2 and whatever its rotation speed, its rotation axis X is always colinear or substantially colinear with the normal n to the optical surface 2, the orientation of the tool 1 therefore being the optimum at all times.
In the embodiment shown in
The tool 1 is therefore adapted to surface a certain range of optical surfaces 2 with different curvatures.
In order to modify the adaptability of the tool 1, it is possible to preload the return means 15 by twisting the flexible leaves 18 so that they are already flexed when no load is applied, one way or the other.
If when no load is applied the leaves 18 are straight or flexed away from the end surface 13, the tool 1 is intended for concave optical surfaces 2, whereas if when no load is applied the leaves 18 are flexed on the same side as the end surface 13 the tool 1 is intended for convex optical surfaces 2.
In a first variant that is not shown, the end surface 13 of the support 4 is convex, the tool 1 thus being intended for optical surfaces 2 having a more pronounced concavity.
In a second variant that is not shown, the end surface 13 of the support 4 is in contrast concave, the tool 1 thus being intended for optical surfaces 2 of more pronounced convexity.
Of course, it is possible to combine the concave or convex implementation of the end surface 13 with the preloading of the return means 15 as described hereinabove.
French patent application 2 857 610, which corresponds to the international application WO 2005/007340, proposes that the spring return means, rather than taking the form of a star-shaped part such as the part 19 shown in
The continuous character of the peripheral portion of these return means increases the regularity of the surfacing effected by the tool.
The invention is aimed at a surfacing tool of the same kind, but in which the regularity of surfacing is further improved together with its qualities of simplicity, convenience and economy.
To this end the invention proposes a tool for surfacing an optical surface, including:
characterized in that said rigid support is part of a base including a flexible flange surrounding said support, said elastically compressible interface being pressed against and covering an end surface of said flange situated on the same side as said end surface.
Thanks to the flange, the area of contact between the interface and the rest of the tool is particularly large, which ensures a uniform distribution of the pressure exerted on the surface to be worked.
The tool according to the invention can therefore effect surfacing offering a high quality of appearance.
Moreover, this greater area of contact facilitates coupling the interface to the rigid support, in particular by gluing.
According to features preferred for the quality of the results obtained or for reasons of simplicity or convenience of fabrication or use:
The disclosure of the invention continues next with a detailed description of preferred embodiments given hereinafter by way of nonlimiting illustration and with reference to the appended drawings. In the latter:
The same reference numbers as for the tool 1 have been used hereinafter for the tool according to the invention, but increased by 100.
Generally speaking, the tool 101 is arranged like the tool 1, with:
According to the invention, the support 104 is part of a base 130 that has a flexible peripheral portion 131 located transversely beyond the rigid support 104, which is centrally disposed.
The peripheral portion 131 forms overall a flexible flange having an outside diameter (greater diameter) similar to the outside diameter of the interface 105 and the pad 106.
The inside diameter (smaller diameter) of the flexible flange 131 corresponds to the outside diameter of the support 104, the flange 131 projecting from the lateral wall of the support 104.
In the example shown in
In the preferred embodiment shown in
The subdivision of the flange 131 into petals makes the flange flexible so that it can conform to different curvatures of surfaces to be polished.
The end surface 113 of the support 104 is flush with the surface 132 of the flange 131 situated on the same side.
The fact that the support 104 and the flange 131 are made in one piece reduces the effects of the edge of the end surface 113 marking the surface to be worked, with the result that the tool 101 can effect surfacing offering a high quality appearance.
Because of the difference in thickness between the flange 131 and the support 104, on the side opposite the surfaces 132 and 113 there is a shoulder 135 at the junction between the flange 131 and the support 104.
Generally speaking, the support 104 has a hat-shaped external contour with a proximal portion 137 that has an outside diameter smaller than the distal portion 136 of which the end surface 113 and the shoulder 135 form part.
The proximal portion 137 serves to connect the support 104, and more generally the base 130, on the one hand, to the spring return means 115, here formed by the star-shaped part 119, and, on the other hand, to the spindle of the surfacing machine enabling the tool 101 to cooperate with an optical surface such as 2 in the manner explained hereinabove with reference to
The proximal portion 137 has an annular recess 138 opening onto the side opposite the end surface 113 and extending axially in the portion 137 to the vicinity of the portion 136.
The inside lateral surface of the recess 138 delimits an annular bush 139 for receiving the head of the spindle of a surfacing machine.
To do this, the bush 139 features a cavity 140 to receive the spindle head. The cavity 140 has a spherical portion 141 with the global shape of three-quarters of a sphere, an annular rib 142 and a frustoconical portion 143, the annular rib 142 being disposed between the portions 141 and 143.
The spindle head designed to be received in the cavity 140 has a part-spherical end shaped like the portion 141 and a cylindrical portion of smaller diameter than the rib 142.
The bush 139 and the spindle of the machine are assembled together by a simple clipping action, the wall of the bush 139 being sufficiently thin, thanks to the recess 138, to be able to deform so that the spherical portion of the spindle head lodges in the portion 141.
When the spindle head is engaged in the cavity 140, the tool 101 cooperates with the spindle in the manner of a ball-joint.
It will be noted that the center of the spherical portion 141 is particularly close to the end surface 113, which enables the tool 101 to assume an optimum orientation relative to the surface such as 2 with which the tool 101 must cooperate.
An annular bush 144 is delimited by the lateral wall of the proximal portion 137 and by the outside lateral wall of the recess 138.
A groove 147 is formed in the lateral wall of the portion 137 to receive a rib 148 on the star-shaped part 119 forming the spring return means 115.
The annular bush 144 can be deformed to enable the rib 148 to be placed in the groove 147 thanks to the fact that the wall of the bush 137 is relatively thin and the annular recess 138 offers the necessary clearance.
The rib 148 on the star-shaped part 119 projects into the bore in the central portion 120 of this part, this bore having a diameter corresponding to that of the lateral surface of the distal portion 137 of the support 104.
When the central portion 120 of the star-shaped part 119 is in place on the support 104, these two parts can turn the one relative to the other about their common axis X.
In
Each of the branches 118 of the part 119 has near its free end and on the side facing toward the base 130 a cusp 145 that has, on the outside, a surface 146 conformed as a portion of a torus centered on the central axis of the part 119, and therefore more generally of the tool 101.
The surfaces 146 of the various cusps 145 are in corresponding relationship with each other and with the outside surface of the deformable ring 117.
More precisely, the ring 117 must be slightly stretched so that it can take its place against the cusps 145, in the manner shown in
As seen in
As indicated hereinabove, the diameter of the interface 105 and the pad 106 corresponds to the outside diameter of the flange 131.
The connection between the interface 105 and the base 130 is effected by means of a double-sided adhesive 150 disposed between the interface 105 and the surfaces 113 and 132 of the base 130.
In the example shown, the elastically compressible interface 105 is a foam having a thickness of the order of 9 mm with a shiny skin that is situated on the same side as the pad 106.
On the side opposite the skin, i.e. on the same side as the double-sided adhesive 150, is heat-welded a polyester (PET) film 151, having a thickness of 23 micrometers, for example.
The connection between the elastically compressible interface 105 and the flexible pad 106 is effected by means of a layer 152 of mastic, here a layer 0.5 mm thick.
Still in the case of the example shown in
The diameter of the interface 105 and the pad 106 is of the order of 55 mm.
The star-shaped part 119 and the base 130 are each injection-molded in one piece from plastic material.
In the example shown, the base 130, which must at one and the same time be rigid in the vicinity of the end surface 113 and flexible in the region of the flange 131 and the annular bushes 139 and 141 to enable clipping, at the same time as offering good resistance to wear for the cooperation with the spindle head, is in polypropylene (PP) or high-density polyethylene (for example PEHD 1000).
To have the required elasticity, the star-shaped part 119 is preferably in polyoxymethylene (POM), or even in polyamide (PA) in order to have a modulus of elasticity between 1500 and 4000 N/mm2.
Thus the star-shaped part 119 and the base 130 are preferably made in different materials, since they must address different physical constraints, the star-shaped part forming the spring return means having to have good spring return characteristics whereas the base must have good resistance to wear for the cooperation with the spindle head and must enable easy bonding with the interface 105.
In the example shown, the deformable ring 117 is a simple commercially available O-ring, for example in Nitrile.
The end surface 113 of the support 104 is part-spherical with a radius of curvature of the order of 70 mm.
When the base 130 is not loaded, i.e. in the absence of external loads, the surface 132 of the flange 131 which, as indicated hereinabove, is flush with the surface 113 is conformed like a truncated cone the smaller diameter whereof corresponds to the largest diameter of the surface 113, the inclination (angle at the apex) of the surface 131 being given by the tangent to the surface 113 in the area of junction with the surface 132.
Thanks to the flange 131, the area of contact between the interface 105 and the rest of the tool, in this instance the base 130, is particularly large since it is formed both by the surface 113 and by the surface 132.
This ensures a uniform distribution of the pressure exerted on the surface to be worked, such as the surface 2 of the lens 3.
In particular, the risk of the sharp edge of the end surface 13 marking the surface to be worked is avoided, as with the prior art tool shown in
More generally this enables the tool 101 to effect surfacing operations having a particularly high quality appearance.
Moreover, the fact of having both the surface 113 and the surface 132 available facilitates the bonding of the interface 105 with the rigid support 104.
A variant 130′ of the base 130 is described next with reference to
The base 130′ is arranged like the base 130 but the radius of curvature R of the end surface 113′ is much smaller, of the order of 30 mm.
The tool that includes the base 130′ is particularly suitable for very highly cambered surfaces.
For the variants 130″ and 130′″ of the base 130 shown in
Generally speaking, the bases 130″ and 130′″ are arranged like the base 130 or the base 130′ but their flanges, 131″ and 131′″, respectively, comprise eight petals 134′ and 134′″, respectively, these petals being delimited by slots 133′ and 133′″, respectively, that are not oriented radially.
More precisely, the slots 133″ are curved whereas the slots 133′″ are rectilinear but disposed in directions that are not radial.
In variants that are not shown, the base of the tool according to the invention has a number of petals other than eight or twelve, for example six or sixteen, and the slots delimiting the petals have different shapes, for example with undulations.
In other variants that are not shown of the base 130, the flange 131 is replaced by a flexible flange that is not subdivided into petals.
In further variants that are not shown, the support 104 is a different shape, for example in two portions forming jaws as in the prior art tool shown in
In further variants of the tool according to the invention, the components other than the base are arranged differently, for example as shown in
Numerous other variants are possible as a function of circumstances, and in this connection it is pointed out that the invention is not limited to the examples described and shown.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
06 03796 | Apr 2006 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2007/000650 | 4/18/2007 | WO | 00 | 11/13/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/128894 | 11/15/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1665292 | Anderson et al. | Apr 1928 | A |
1701669 | Favre | Feb 1929 | A |
3395417 | Matouka | Aug 1968 | A |
3653857 | Field | Apr 1972 | A |
4287685 | Marton | Sep 1981 | A |
5403231 | Duckworth | Apr 1995 | A |
7033261 | Huguet | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7217176 | Schneider et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7223164 | Bernard et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
20040072515 | Miyahara et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050101235 | Huguet | May 2005 | A1 |
20060154581 | Bernard et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 291 134 | Mar 2003 | EP |
2 857 610 | Jan 2005 | FR |
1011741 | Dec 1965 | GB |
WO 03059572 | Jul 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080171502 A1 | Jul 2008 | US |