The present inventions are generally related to mechanisms for guiding a tool within a lumen of a medical device used to remove objects from the body. More particularly, the inventions are directed to a tool for guiding laser lithotripsy devices in kidney stone treatment catheters.
Kidney stones are a common medical problem that negatively affect millions of individuals worldwide. Kidney stones include one or more solid masses of material that are usually made of crystals and form in parts of the urinary tract including in the ureter, the kidney, and/or the bladder. Kidney stones range in size from small (less than about 1 cm) to very large (more than 4 cm) and may cause significant pain to the patient and damage to the kidney. One method of treatment for removal of kidney stones includes the use of an ureteroscope and an extraction catheter. A physician advances the ureteroscope through the ureter and into the kidney. The physician inspects the kidney with the ureteroscope, locating and counting the stones within the calyces of the kidney. A laser lithotripsy device is then inserted through the ureteroscope and is used to fragmentize the larger kidney stones into smaller pieces. The ureteroscope is then removed and an extraction catheter is introduced for removal of the fragmented and smaller, un-fragmented stones. The extraction catheter includes a vacuum lumen for removal of the stones through an aspiration port. The vacuum lumen is large in diameter to allow for the passage of the stones.
One problem associated with the above procedure is that the physician may have to repeat the insertion and removal of the ureteroscope and the extraction catheter to remove all of the stones. For example, a remaining fragmented stone could be too large for extraction by the catheter, which would necessitate reinsertion of the laser via the ureteroscope to fragmentize the stone. It is apparent that repeating the steps of reinsertion of the ureteroscope and extraction catheter increases the risk of complications to the patient, including tissue irritation and laceration. Accordingly, engineers have developed more advanced systems where the various components of the ureteroscope and extraction catheter are combined into one medical device. That is, catheter advancements have provided the ability to combine the camera, laser, aspiration, and irrigation components into one system, to streamline kidney stone removal procedure and reduce the chances of adverse consequences associated with this procedure.
A challenge associated with these advanced catheter systems has been the inability to maintain a suitable catheter diameter. The consolidation of components, especially a laser, requires additional channels, which would make the catheter larger in profile than desired. Larger diameter catheters can cause more tissue irritation and injury when navigated thought the ureter, renal pelvis, and renal calyces. In some instances, a large diameter catheter may not be able to access the kidney at all because of a narrow and/or tortuous ureter. One proposed solution for maintaining a low catheter profile has been the use existing lumens, such as the vacuum lumen, for the laser. The use of the vacuum lumen is plausible because it is wide enough to accommodate a laser. Laser fibers have diameters smaller than vacuum lumens (the diameter of the vacuum lumen is much larger than the diameter of the working channel of the ureteroscope that receives the laser device). However, this significant difference in diameter causes the laser fiber to move within the vacuum lumen. Unwanted movement of the laser fiber prevents the clinician from being able to target stones with precision. Any side-to-side movement of the laser fiber in the vacuum lumen not only makes it difficult to fragmentize the stones, but also can increase the risk of the laser causing damage to nearby tissues.
The embodiments of the present inventions provide a tool for allowing, inter alia, a laser to be effectively used with an extraction catheter system for fragmenting kidney stones while concomitantly allowing stones to flow past the laser and through the vacuum lumen.
In accordance with one aspect of the inventions, a catheter assembly is provided comprising a working lumen and a guide. The guide is configured to position a fragmentizing device within the working lumen. The guide is configured to prevent or minimize any unintended movement of a distal section of the fragmentizing device within the working lumen when the distal section of the fragmentizing device is positioned at a distal end of the working lumen. In one embodiment, the working lumen is a vacuum lumen, and the guide is configured to be positioned in the vacuum lumen. The guide allows for fluid and debris to flow past the fragmentizing device and through the vacuum lumen for removal of fluid and debris. In one embodiment, the catheter assembly additionally comprises an actuating device for moving the guide in a back-and-forth direction within the vacuum lumen. The fragmentizing device can include a laser fiber or device.
The guide can comprise:
In accordance with one aspect of the inventions, a kidney stone removal system is provided, comprising a vacuum tube and a laser guide configured to be removably inserted into the vacuum tube. The laser guide comprises a tubular body having a lumen configured to receive a laser device, and wings extending from a distal end segment of the tubular body for guiding the distal end segment of the tubular body in the vacuum tube and creating flow gaps between the tubular body and the vacuum tube.
In one embodiment, the tubular body is configured to not extend out of a distal end of the vacuum tube when the tubular body is inserted completely into the vacuum tube and placed in an operational position. In one embodiment, the guide comprises two to four wings. In one embodiment, the guide consists of three or four wings and a circumferential distance is the same between each pair of neighboring wings. In one embodiment, the guide consists of three or four wings and the circumferential distance between a first pair of the neighboring wings is different from a circumferential distance between a second pair of neighboring wings. The first pair and second pair of neighboring wings can share a common wing. In some embodiments, at least two of the gaps have different sizes.
In one embodiment, each wing comprises a middle segment having a rectangular shape, which transitions into tapered end segments that slope downward into the tubular body. In some embodiments, each wing has a variable thickness that increases from a proximal end of the wing to a distal end of the wing along a longitudinal axis. In some embodiments, each wing has a longitudinal axis that is at an angle relative to a longitudinal axis of the tubular body.
In accordance with another aspect of the inventions, the kidney stone removal system additionally comprising an actuator for moving the tubular body within the vacuum tube. In one embodiment, the actuator comprises a biasing element and a shaft coupled to the tubular body, such that actuation of the biasing element causes the shaft to move the tubular body in a back-and-forth direction within the vacuum tube. In one embodiment, the shaft is configured to be removably coupled to a proximal end of the tubular body. In an alternative embodiment, the shaft is permanently attached to a proximal end of the tubular body.
In one embodiment, the biasing element comprises a band coupled to a distal section of the shaft. The actuator can additionally comprise a cylindrical housing coupled to the band and configured to receive the shaft, such that an inward compression and release of the band causes a part of the shaft to telescopically move into and out from the cylindrical housing. The actuator comprises a channel for receiving the laser device. The channel is configured to be in commutation with the lumen of the tubular body.
In accordance with another aspect of the inventions, a catheter assembly is provided comprising a vacuum tube and a guiding device configured to be removably positioned in the vacuum tube for receiving a debris fragmentizing device. The guiding device is configured to prevent an unintended movement of the fragmentizing device when the fragmentizing device is positioned at a distal end of the vacuum tube, while allowing fluid and debris to flow past the fragmentizing device and through the vacuum tube. The catheter system can additionally include an actuating device for moving the guiding device within the vacuum tube for clearance of debris. The fragmentizing device can be a laser fiber.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a method of kidney stone removal with the use of all of the embodiments of the present inventions is provided.
The figures are not to scale.
In accordance with one aspect of the present inventions, a vacuum lumen of the catheter can be used for insertion and retraction of stone fragmentation-inducing device such as a lithotripsy device or, most preferably, a laser lithotripsy device. An inner diameter of the inner tube 18 (i.e., the diameter of the vacuum lumen 20) needs to be large enough to accommodate passage of numerous stone fragments without clogging. In the embodiments of the present inventions, diameter of the vacuum lumen can be, for example, 2.0 mm to 3.0 mm, or in some configurations about 2.5 mm. Laser fibers and lithotripsy devices, however, have diameters considerably smaller than the vacuum lumen diameter. This significant difference in diameter causes the fragmentation-inducing device to move around or shift, during operation, within the vacuum lumen. The unintended movement of the laser makes it difficult for the physical to target stones with precision.
Accordingly, the embodiments of the present inventions provide an intermediate device for securing the fragmentation-inducing device (preferably a laser device or fiber) into the vacuum lumen. The intermediate device is configured to completely prevent or significantly minimize the movement of the laser fiber at the distal end of the vacuum lumen, while not impeding the functionality of the vacuum lumen and allowing fluid and solids to flow past the laser fiber.
While a preferred two-wing design is illustrated in
The guide 30 fixedly supports the head of the laser fiber at the distal tip of a vacuum lumen while allowing the vacuum lumen to aspirate stones, debris, and fluids during the laser procedure and concomitantly with the fragmentation of kidney stones. However, the presence of the guide 30 reduces the inner working diameter of the vacuum lumen. Thus, the guide 30 increases the chance of larger sized stones gathered and/or becoming lodged at the entry point of the vacuum lumen, as well as in the gaps 44 or between the wings 34. Such clogging can reduce evacuation efficiency and require manual debris clearance or increasing internal pressures. Accordingly, a device can be used to cause back-and-forth movement, vibration, or oscillation of the guide 30 to clear or extricate lodged or clogged stones. Minor back-and-forth movement of the guide 30 can be effective at dislodging debris and clearing the vacuum lumen. In accordance with one embodiment, as illustrated in
In some embodiments, the guide 100 can come in a kit that includes a loading element that straightens the curved sections 120, 130 to facilitate insertion of the laser fiber 42. After insertion of the laser fiber 42, the loading element is removed and the guide 100 assumes its pre-formed/biased shape with the laser fiber 42 inside the guide 100.
In certain embodiments disclosed herein, it can be advantageous to use a loading mechanism for the laser fiber to assist with placing the laser fiber within a guiding feature in a vacuum tube. One example of a loading mechanism is a cap to be temporarily placed over the tip of the laser fiber, where the tip acts as a feature like a hole, a loop, or a projection that helps orient the laser fiber to the guiding feature in the vacuum tube.
Referring still to
Other embodiments of a laser guide include a laser guide formed from multiple optical fibers surrounding a central lumen through which as laser fiber can be introduced. In this embodiment, a working channel is used for both lighting and the laser and this frees some of the cross-section of the device to be used for irrigation lumen(s) and/or vacuum lumen(s).
Other embodiments of a laser guide include using water jets or vacuum flow to maintain the laser fiber position within the vacuum lumen. The water jets can engage the laser fiber at a position beyond the end of the vacuum lumen to maintain the position of the laser fiber with respect to the vacuum lumen. The water jets are generated by ports on the guide or on the device in which the guide is inserted. Alternatively or in combination, the vacuum lumen can be configured to produce fluid flow through the vacuum lumen that engages the laser fiber within the vacuum lumen to maintain the position of the laser fiber with respect to the vacuum lumen.
Other embodiments of a laser guide include a steerable guide with at least one steering wire that can be steered separately and in conjunction with the steering of the main catheter. The steering of the guide can be locked into place or locked into steered configuration (i.e., a curved shape).
While the following embodiment of method of use is described with reference to
The various examples, aspects, and embodiments of the kidney stone removal systems disclosed herein provide various advantages when used to treat kidney stones. These advantages are being provided by way of illustration and are not intended to limit the scope of the claims. One advantage is the ability to prevent or to mitigate the possibility of overpressurizing the kidney during kidney stone treatment. In conventional laser lithotripsy of kidney stones, irrigation fluid can be introduced during ureteroscopy and/or during laser lithotripsy. In most cases, the irrigation fluid can drain out of the kidney only via the narrow space between the ureteroscope and the access sheath. This narrow space can become narrowed further by debris such as kidney stone fragments, clots, or other substances. When the egress of fluid from the kidney is limited by such a narrow space, continued infusion of irrigation fluid creates the risk of high pressures in the kidney, which can cause sepsis and/or other complications. The kidney stone removal system disclosed herein provides a much larger egress channel via the large diameter vacuum lumen. Further, it is possible to apply vacuum through the large diameter vacuum lumen while introducing irrigation fluid. The large diameter of the vacuum lumen in combination with the ability to apply vacuum while delivering irrigation fluid significantly reduces the likelihood of overpressurizing the kidney, resulting in safer kidney stone removal procedures.
Another advantage of the kidney stone removal systems disclosed herein is the ability to prevent or mitigate thermal damage to the kidney during laser lithotripsy. Heat is generated within the kidney during laser lithotripsy of kidney stone, in particular with higher power lasers. This heat can be damaging to the kidney and is a concern for physicians when performing laser lithotripsy. Irrigation fluid can help dissipate the heat via conductive heat transfer, but as described herein irrigation fluid can also build up within the kidney if the pathway for draining is relatively narrow. The kidney stone removal system disclosed herein provides a much larger egress channel via the large diameter vacuum lumen in combination with the ability to apply vacuum while delivering irrigation fluid. The kidney stone removal system disclosed herein can maintain a safe temperature within the kidney by rapidly removing heated irrigation fluid from the kidney and introducing relatively cooler irrigation fluid in a continuous manner during laser lithotripsy. In the examples, aspects, and embodiments of the kidney stone removal system that include a laser guide, heated irrigation fluid can easily and rapidly flow through the vacuum lumen even while the laser fiber is being used to fragment kidney stones and comparatively cooler irrigation fluid can easily and rapidly enter the kidney via the irrigation ports on the nozzle. This rapid heat transfer via irrigation fluid rapidly introduced and removed from the kidney significantly reduces the likelihood of thermal damage to the kidney, resulting in safer kidney stone removal procedures.
Another advantage of the kidney stone removal systems disclosed herein is the ability to improve visibility in the kidney during laser lithotripsy. In conventional laser lithotripsy, debris from fragmenting kidney stones frequently obscures the view from the imaging portion of a ureteroscope and makes it difficult for a physician to see areas of interest within the kidney and/or the kidney stones being fragmented. Physicians often describe a “snow globe” effect during laser lithotripsy in which debris is ejected from the kidney stone in a random and chaotic manner that quickly fills their field of view. The kidney stone removal system disclosed herein can improve visibility by rapidly removing debris fluidized in the irrigation fluid from the kidney through the large diameter vacuum lumen and introducing clear irrigation fluid in a continuous manner during laser lithotripsy. In the examples, aspects, and embodiments of the kidney stone removal system that include a laser guide, debris suspended or fluidized in irrigation fluid can easily and rapidly flow through the vacuum lumen even while the laser fiber is being used to fragment kidney stones. Further, rather than a random and chaotic field of view, the kidney stone removal system disclosed herein provides a predictable pattern as debris moves in a regular motion across the field of view to the vacuum lumen. Such a regular pattern makes it easier for a physician to stay oriented with anatomical landmarks in the field of view. Still further, because of the comparatively large egress channel (as compared to the narrow channel between the ureteroscope and access sheath) more debris is removed and removed faster using the kidney stone removal system disclosed herein. In some cases, even with little or no applied vacuum the large diameter of the vacuum lumen creates sufficient passive outflow to substantially improve visibility. The large diameter of the vacuum lumen in combination with the ability to apply vacuum while delivering irrigation fluid and in combination with the regular debris flow pattern significantly improves visibility during laser lithotripsy, resulting in safer, more efficient, and more effective kidney stone removal procedures.
Another advantage of the kidney stone removal systems disclosed herein is the ability to rapidly apply and remove therapeutic or diagnostic agents in the kidney during laser lithotripsy. The irrigation fluid can have chemical or biological agents applied to it from the source bag or using a port adjacent to the system handle. These agents can be therapeutic, such as, but not limited to, hemostatic, antibiotic, and/or lytic agents. And these agents can be diagnostic, such as, but not limited to, contrast agents.
Another advantage of the kidney stone removal systems disclosed herein is that the irrigation ports can provide a flow rate independent of the tool being used within the vacuum lumen. Conventional ureteroscopes typically provide irrigation through the working channel and this same working channel is used to provide access for laser fibers or baskets. The presence of a tool within the working channel alters the fluid dynamics and changes the flow rate and other flow characteristics. In contrast, the kidney stone removal systems disclosed herein delivers irrigation fluid via dedicated irrigation ports such that the flow characteristics are independent of the tool being used, if any, in the vacuum lumen.
It is understood that this disclosure, in many respects, is only illustrative of the numerous alternative device embodiments of the present inventions. Changes may be made in the details, particularly in matters of shape, size, material and arrangement of various device components without exceeding the scope of the various embodiments of the invention. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the exemplary embodiments and descriptions thereof are merely illustrative of the invention as a whole. While several principles of the inventions are made clear in the exemplary embodiments described above, those skilled in the art will appreciate that modifications of the structure, arrangement, proportions, elements, materials and methods of use, may be utilized in the practice of the invention, and otherwise, which are particularly adapted to specific environments and operative requirements without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, while certain features and elements have been described in connection with particular embodiments, those skilled in the art will appreciate that those features and elements can be combined with the other embodiments disclosed herein.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 18/373,229, filed Sep. 26, 2023, which in turn claims priority to, and the benefit of, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/411,568, filed Sep. 29, 2022, the contents of all of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3065749 | Brass | Nov 1962 | A |
3438607 | Williams et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
3749090 | Stewart | Jul 1973 | A |
3830240 | Antonevich et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
4146300 | Kaiser | Mar 1979 | A |
4203430 | Takahashi | May 1980 | A |
4215476 | Armstrong | Aug 1980 | A |
4294233 | Takahashi | Oct 1981 | A |
4295464 | Shihata | Oct 1981 | A |
4393872 | Reznik et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4418688 | Loeb | Dec 1983 | A |
4458877 | Holmes | Jul 1984 | A |
4483326 | Yamaka et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4519385 | Atkinson et al. | May 1985 | A |
4630598 | Bonnet | Dec 1986 | A |
4648871 | Jacob | Mar 1987 | A |
4655197 | Atkinson | Apr 1987 | A |
4662871 | Rafelson | May 1987 | A |
4680026 | Weightman et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4688555 | Wardle | Aug 1987 | A |
4696669 | Menhusen | Sep 1987 | A |
4706656 | Kuboto | Nov 1987 | A |
4708717 | Deane et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4802461 | Cho | Feb 1989 | A |
4852551 | Opie et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4874360 | Goldberg et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4941872 | Felix et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4950265 | Taylor | Aug 1990 | A |
4995872 | Ferrara | Feb 1991 | A |
4996974 | Ciarlei | Mar 1991 | A |
5057080 | Takahashi | Oct 1991 | A |
5095889 | Weissmuller et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5120305 | Boehringer et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5156142 | Anapliotis et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5186714 | Boudreault et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5191881 | Beck | Mar 1993 | A |
5226885 | Takahashi | Jul 1993 | A |
5230704 | Moberg et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5258006 | Rydell | Nov 1993 | A |
5263938 | Orr et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5265840 | Gillespie et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5273524 | Fox et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5281212 | Savage et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5295956 | Bales et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5300043 | Devlin et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5307803 | Matsuura et al. | May 1994 | A |
5312327 | Bales et al. | May 1994 | A |
5312332 | Bales et al. | May 1994 | A |
5312400 | Bales et al. | May 1994 | A |
5314406 | Arias et al. | May 1994 | A |
5318541 | Viera et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5336172 | Bales et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5336220 | Ryan et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5350356 | Bales et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5354291 | Bales et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5429596 | Arias et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5476450 | Ruggio | Dec 1995 | A |
5484402 | Saravia et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5512035 | Konstorum et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5512045 | Gurchumelidze | Apr 1996 | A |
5549547 | Cohen et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5579779 | Humphrey | Dec 1996 | A |
5588634 | Nettekoven | Dec 1996 | A |
5607420 | Schuman | Mar 1997 | A |
5609573 | Sandock | Mar 1997 | A |
5643304 | Schechter et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5658258 | Kneer et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5776096 | Fields | Jul 1998 | A |
5827229 | Auth et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830214 | Flom et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836909 | Cosmescu | Nov 1998 | A |
5885228 | Rosenman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885288 | Aust et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5944690 | Falwell et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5961485 | Martin | Oct 1999 | A |
5980504 | Sharkey et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6066150 | Gonon | May 2000 | A |
6168577 | Niederjohn et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179807 | Henniges et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6213970 | Nelson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6328730 | Harkrider | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6358200 | Grossi | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6471639 | Rudischhauser et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6551281 | Raulerson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6623445 | Nelson et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6635028 | Ielpo et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6645140 | Brommersma et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6755806 | Von Casimir | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6776765 | Soukup et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6827701 | MacMahon et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6830556 | Harmon et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6857617 | Forberg | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6887221 | Baillargeon et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6929236 | Height et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6932788 | Kamiyama et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939369 | Osborne et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6960189 | Bates et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6969368 | Anspach et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6997867 | Soble et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7004931 | Hogendijk | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7025720 | Boebel et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7179269 | Welch et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7249602 | Emanuel | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7297133 | Nelson et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7465288 | Dudney et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7500947 | Kucklick et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7503893 | Kucklick | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7530976 | MacMahon et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7540868 | Elliott et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7571889 | Miyahara | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7802574 | Schultz | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7810784 | Abe et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7846126 | Steen et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7857770 | Raulerson et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7883516 | Huang et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7935049 | Michel et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7947039 | Sartor | May 2011 | B2 |
7972282 | Clark et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8002732 | Vicsonti | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8052607 | Byrd | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8062214 | Shener et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8118731 | Kucklick et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8123676 | Kucklick | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8192500 | Chung | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8226548 | Kucklick | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8241278 | Sartor | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8313081 | Adelberg | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8353860 | Boulais et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8419626 | Shener-Irmakoglu et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8454536 | Raulerson et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8460182 | Ouyang et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8475453 | Marczyk et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8613735 | Omeda et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8672928 | Liu et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8702681 | Douglas et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8721595 | Stiehl et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8740773 | Kucklick et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8808168 | Ettwein et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8845521 | Maruyama | Sep 2014 | B2 |
D715921 | Wan | Oct 2014 | S |
8858569 | Wan | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8870748 | Kucklick | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8888683 | Mejia | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8894601 | Moehle et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8945093 | Ahluwalia | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9011412 | Albritton et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9089631 | Schaeffer et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9095646 | Chow et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9095682 | Romoscanu | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9119926 | Cuevas et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9138347 | Wiljanen et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9155453 | Kumar et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9155454 | Sahney et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9167958 | Banik et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9179968 | Leo et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9186044 | Kucklick et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9186055 | Kucklick | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9192284 | Hirsch et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9204786 | Kucklick | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9241612 | Hoshino | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9248228 | Bono et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9339631 | Graham et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9358061 | Plascencia et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9360124 | Schaeffer et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9387121 | Wiljanen et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9427504 | Newman | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9545334 | Steen et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9572933 | Grannell et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9622646 | Ouyang et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9668643 | Kennedy et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9717397 | Kucklick | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9743827 | Yasunaga et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9744276 | Ahluwalia | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9757195 | Plascencia et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9775674 | Schaeffer et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9810836 | Okagami et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9814490 | Neoh et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9820762 | Cadeddu et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9827009 | Kucklick et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9833130 | Schaeffer et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9839739 | Qian | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9861788 | Yu et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9878145 | Holm et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9883960 | Cummins et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9884143 | Kobida et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9918859 | Cummins et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9936963 | Batchelor et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9968249 | Huang et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9974554 | Antonelli et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9980631 | Schaeffer et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9982791 | Schaeffer et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10004385 | Bresco Torras et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10010657 | Torrance et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10010700 | Romoscanu | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10028763 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10076432 | Cummins et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10085624 | Isoda et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10092173 | Dejima | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10098768 | Cummins et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10105247 | Cummins et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10154919 | Cummins et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10165933 | Dejima | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10166013 | Nguyen et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10213533 | Walter | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10220123 | Monty et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10231793 | Romo | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10244927 | Kennedy, II et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10245359 | Bono et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10251539 | Sahney et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10251671 | Dejima | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10265056 | Stanton et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10271716 | Ferreira et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10286141 | Monty et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10293105 | Panotopoulos | May 2019 | B2 |
10383656 | Raulerson et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10434259 | Dejima et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10441134 | Ouyang et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10441153 | Huang et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10441460 | Ross et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10456519 | Ngo-Chu et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10478596 | Graham et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10492662 | Govrin et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10500323 | Huering et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10507303 | Terwey | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10531883 | Deville et al. | Jan 2020 | B1 |
10561440 | Look et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10583272 | Yu et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10595715 | Dejima | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10596306 | Ahluwalia | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10610622 | Jeong | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10624708 | Hunter | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10625062 | Matlock et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10694927 | Kucklick | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10722253 | Deville et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10722620 | Chuang et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10758385 | Cummins et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10765449 | Dejima | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10842519 | Suh et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10850013 | Hsu et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10888349 | Pereira et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10905446 | Chae | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10912873 | Nitzan et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10918365 | Kirkemo | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10925666 | Plascencia et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10932798 | Shelton et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10952758 | Evans | Mar 2021 | B1 |
10959868 | Cummins et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10966737 | Nguyen | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10967107 | Forsberg et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10980554 | Sperry et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11013522 | Ciulla | May 2021 | B2 |
11026715 | Mayberry | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11035481 | Schaeffer et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11051678 | Nieman | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11064869 | McWeeney et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11064871 | Gerbo et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11076755 | Huang et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11089944 | Rentschler et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11090072 | Morey et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11096555 | Harrah et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11096568 | Harrah et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11109874 | Gavala et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11116530 | Yurek | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11123483 | Panotopoulos | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11141177 | Ganz et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11141185 | Efremkin | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11167077 | Long et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11179520 | Farah et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11185380 | Burbank et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11241243 | Pereira et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11241290 | Waterbury et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11260928 | Taylor | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11278300 | Bahmanyar et al. | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11284912 | St. George | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11284940 | Shelton | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11324526 | Yurek | May 2022 | B2 |
11330966 | Harrah et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
11357523 | Bionda et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11382643 | Horowitz et al. | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11382650 | Noonan et al. | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11382652 | Wasdyke et al. | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11382693 | Harrah et al. | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11399892 | Yu et al. | Aug 2022 | B2 |
11419679 | Khachaturov et al. | Aug 2022 | B2 |
11433172 | Gao et al. | Sep 2022 | B2 |
11452436 | Chu et al. | Sep 2022 | B2 |
11452534 | Pereira et al. | Sep 2022 | B2 |
11471175 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 2022 | B2 |
11471176 | Greenhalgh et al. | Oct 2022 | B2 |
11490912 | Bonneau et al. | Nov 2022 | B2 |
11490913 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2022 | B2 |
11503993 | Chu et al. | Nov 2022 | B2 |
11510691 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2022 | B2 |
11534190 | Chu | Dec 2022 | B2 |
11534249 | Romo et al. | Dec 2022 | B2 |
11547479 | Shelton et al. | Jan 2023 | B2 |
11559360 | Romo | Jan 2023 | B2 |
11571229 | Shah | Feb 2023 | B2 |
11576692 | Gatineau et al. | Feb 2023 | B2 |
11576853 | Petkoska et al. | Feb 2023 | B2 |
11577056 | Rentschler et al. | Feb 2023 | B2 |
11589881 | Horowitz et al. | Feb 2023 | B2 |
11596423 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2023 | B2 |
11602262 | Chu | Mar 2023 | B2 |
11602363 | Nguyen | Mar 2023 | B2 |
11607484 | Hanna et al. | Mar 2023 | B2 |
11653827 | Chu et al. | May 2023 | B2 |
11672598 | Morey et al. | Jun 2023 | B2 |
20030199986 | Mcweeney et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030216760 | Welch et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040019358 | Kear | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040143197 | Soukup et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153095 | Seddon | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153111 | Hosoada | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040193103 | Kumar | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040236312 | Nistal et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040267213 | Knapp | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050085692 | Kiehn et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085769 | MacMahon et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050143678 | Schwarz et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149201 | Mcweeney et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060041186 | Vancaillie | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060069343 | Rontal | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060135948 | Vrma | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149127 | Seddiqui et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060206004 | Dehmel et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060264995 | Fanton et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070185383 | Mulhern et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070298069 | Bucay-couto et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004578 | Nixon et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080058588 | Emanuel | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080146991 | Hernandez et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080167526 | Crank et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080167527 | Slenker et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080249483 | Slenker et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090163846 | Aklog et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090270894 | Rubin et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100010431 | Tulley | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100056867 | Labombard et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100137846 | Desai et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100305475 | Hinchliffe et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004197 | Sansoucy | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110060315 | Windheuser et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110202039 | Schaaf | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110224489 | Deal et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110245841 | Shohat et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120041358 | Mann et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120220832 | Nakade et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130024003 | Mcweeney et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130123721 | Stiehl et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130131445 | Zerfas et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138036 | Solomon et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130165944 | Gal et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130231605 | Walter | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253387 | Bonutti et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140107565 | Wiljanen et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140171922 | Douglas et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140180010 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140207056 | Bono et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140276207 | Ouyang et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276377 | Chang et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140288460 | Ouyang et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140296868 | Garrison et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140296894 | Kojima et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150038785 | Govrin et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150141907 | Clement et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150150441 | Ouyang et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150164595 | Bogusky et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150305759 | St. George et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150328394 | Chow et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160001050 | Yee et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160022289 | Wan | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160030070 | Eisner | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160120557 | Goddard et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160270804 | Honda et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160374710 | Sinelnikov et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160374755 | Mirigian et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170027604 | Wallace | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170065752 | Eisner | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170215897 | Fan | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170215899 | Harrah et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170215964 | Harrah et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170215965 | Harrah et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170252051 | Wan et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170252103 | Griefeneder et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170258550 | Vazales | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170266046 | Steen et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170303940 | Sperry et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170303941 | Eisner | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170319776 | Eisner | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170333614 | Gao et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170340862 | Calabrese et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170354431 | Rubin et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180055568 | Shelton et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180206866 | Wan | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180360480 | Ciulla | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190038817 | Forsberg et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190059988 | Davison et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190099209 | Witt et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190192222 | Mirigian et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190274699 | Morey et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190290811 | Bono et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190314044 | Long et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190328412 | Mazhar et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190343586 | Bonneau et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190357762 | Clayman et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200009302 | Pyle | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200046393 | Kendale et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200069319 | Harrah et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200147294 | Edwards | May 2020 | A1 |
20200178767 | Miller | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200178773 | Miller | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200188014 | Woloszko et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200196843 | Tah et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200229907 | Duehlmeier | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200297362 | Deville et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200397507 | Liu | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200397975 | Kirk et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210015507 | Roberts et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210015509 | Wan | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210022756 | Ciulla | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210022757 | Wan | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210022759 | Wan | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210076904 | Calabrese et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210084766 | Govrin | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210085158 | Ikuma et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210093338 | Baker et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210093340 | Baker et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210093341 | Baker et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210113268 | Waisman et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210121188 | Yurek | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210177444 | Shelton et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210178032 | Hsu et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210228274 | Pyro et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210236204 | Tower et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210275248 | Pyro et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210307589 | Rentschler et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210315595 | Crawford et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210315608 | Mozloom, Jr. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210321861 | McWeeney et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210322040 | Gavala et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210330309 | Ma et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210338064 | Fitterer et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20210338257 | Morey et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20210361356 | Shelton et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20210369095 | Stem et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20210378740 | Chu et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20210386273 | Purohit et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220000508 | Schmitt et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220022912 | Efremkin et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220023528 | Long et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220023563 | Ganz et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220031392 | Maher et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220047283 | Baker et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220047287 | Stender et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220047332 | Schmitt et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220053995 | Knollman et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220053998 | Ghani et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220054162 | Efremkin | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220061827 | Schmitt et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220061866 | Crawford et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220072213 | Thoreson | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220087697 | Yurek | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220087698 | Yurek | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220096108 | Baker et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220104839 | Horowitz et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220104840 | Horowitz et al. | Apr 2022 | A1 |
20220133340 | Schaeffer et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220135171 | Taylor | May 2022 | A1 |
20220142463 | Altshuler et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220142659 | Melsheimer et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220168003 | Crowley | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220183706 | Pereira et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220202285 | Bukesov et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220226016 | Ganz et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220218367 | Ghani et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
20220218416 | Vogel | Jul 2022 | A1 |
20220233199 | Du et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
20220240761 | Harrah et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
20220240762 | Rentschler et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
20220265350 | Clayman et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
20220273860 | Wiener et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220280021 | Chu | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220287774 | Ikuma et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220287775 | Harrah et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220296300 | Takata | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220304548 | Chu | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220313290 | Obermiller et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220323153 | Yu et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220338891 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220354520 | Mannion et al. | Nov 2022 | A1 |
20220362449 | Gao et al. | Nov 2022 | A1 |
20220362511 | Gavalis et al. | Nov 2022 | A1 |
20220369906 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2022 | A1 |
20220369919 | Chu et al. | Nov 2022 | A1 |
20220370085 | Reagan, Jr. et al. | Nov 2022 | A1 |
20220370127 | Khachaturov et al. | Nov 2022 | A1 |
20220386852 | Chu et al. | Dec 2022 | A1 |
20220387534 | Petkoska | Dec 2022 | A1 |
20220401119 | Pereira et al. | Dec 2022 | A1 |
20230028334 | Aljure | Jan 2023 | A1 |
20230030708 | Noonan et al. | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230031136 | Ikuma | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230055911 | Chu et al. | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230063701 | Horowitz et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230066304 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230075988 | Scheib et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230081712 | Shelton et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230083127 | Hayashi et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230103647 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230113437 | Horie et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230113650 | Sasaguchi | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230115997 | Sato et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230125143 | Schmitt | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230130679 | Avolos | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230130759 | Shelton | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230131637 | Shelton et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230145569 | McWeeney et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230146163 | Yurek | May 2023 | A1 |
20230146598 | Yurek | May 2023 | A1 |
20230148845 | McWeeney et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230165599 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230181011 | Chu | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230181203 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230181204 | Shah | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230190078 | Clayman et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230190316 | Nguyen | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230190317 | Horowitz et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230190373 | Hutchens et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230210586 | Mantri et al. | Jul 2023 | A1 |
20230263369 | Chu et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
20230263571 | Chu et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
20230301718 | Harrah et al. | Sep 2023 | A1 |
20230346202 | Harrah et al. | Nov 2023 | A1 |
20240057855 | Reed et al. | Feb 2024 | A1 |
20240099563 | Wales et al. | Mar 2024 | A1 |
20240130743 | Hajjar | Apr 2024 | A1 |
20240138666 | Chu et al. | May 2024 | A1 |
20240138913 | Carlson et al. | May 2024 | A1 |
20240148394 | Baker et al. | May 2024 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
203776869 | Aug 2014 | CN |
203776946 | Aug 2014 | CN |
203988361 | Dec 2014 | CN |
10-2167406 | Oct 2020 | KR |
WO 2010068467 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 2014160201 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO 2017135980 | Aug 2017 | WO |
WO 2018215954 | Nov 2018 | WO |
WO 2019178387 | Sep 2019 | WO |
WO 2020146454 | Jul 2020 | WO |
WO 2020150713 | Jul 2020 | WO |
WO 2020247103 | Dec 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ali, et al. “Retrograde Cystonephroscopy for Cmoplex Renal Calculi Using Novel Dual-Action Aspiration, Irrigation Cystoscope: Initial Case Series”, Journal of Endourology; Jul. 2022; vol. 36 (7); pp. 898-905. |
Chen, et al: “The Comparison Study of Flexible Ureteroscopic Suctioning Lithotripsy With Intelligent Pressure Control Versus Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Suctioning Nephrolithotomy in Treating Renal Calculi of 2 to 3 cm in Size”, Surgical Innovation 2019; vol. 26(5); pp. 528-535, 8 pages. |
Chew, et al., “Natural History, Complications and Re-Intervention Rates of Asymptomatic Residual Stone Fragments after Ureteroscopy: a Report from the EDGE Research Consortium”, The Journal of Urology; Apr. 2016 (published online Nov. 2015); vol. 195, pp. 982-986. |
Communication dated Oct. 26, 2021 forwarding the extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 19746731.9; 12 pages. |
Deng, et al., “A Novel Flexible Ureteroscopy with Intelligent Control of Renal Pelvic Pressure: An Initial Experience of 93 Cases”, Journal of Endourology; Oct. 2016 (published online Aug. 2016); vol. 30(10), pp. 1067-1072, 6 pages. |
Deng, et al., “Suctioning flexible ureteroscopy with automatic controlof renal pelvic pressure: a porcine model”, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Mar. 30, 2016, 6 pages. |
Emmott, et al., “Complications, Re-Intervention Rates, and Natural History of Residual Stone Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy”, Journal of Endourology; Jan. 2018; vol. 32(1), pp. 28-32. |
Final Office Action dated Aug. 25, 2023, for U.S. Appl. No. 18/090,802, 29 pages. |
Huang, et al., “Endourology and Stones | The Application of Suctioning Flexible Ureteroscopy With Intelligent Pressure Control in Treating Upper Urinary Tract Calculi on Patients With a Solitary Kidney”, Urology Jan. 2018; vol. 111, pp. 44-47. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jul. 31, 2023 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2023/014276, 60 pages. |
Invitation To Pay Additional Fees And, Where Applicable, Protest Fee mailed May 24, 2023 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2023/014276; 14 pages. |
Jiang, et al: “Ex Vivo Renal Stone Dusting: Impact of Laser Modality, Ureteral Access Sheath, and Suction on Total Stone Clearance”, Journal of Endourology; Apr. 2022; vol. 36(4); pp. 499-507. |
Karani, et al: “Evaluation of a Novel Female Gender Flexible Ureteroscope: Comparison of Flow and Deflection to a Standard Flexible Ureteroscope”, Journal of Endourology; Jun. 2021; vol. 35(6); pp. 840-846. |
Keller, et al: “Next-Generation Fiberoptic and Digital Ureteroscopes”, Urol Clin North Am.; May 2019; vol. 46(2); pp. 147-163. |
Kim, et al., “The Clinical Efficacy of Dual-Lumen Catheter Technique in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Management of Nephrolithiasis: A Propensity Score Analysis”, Journal of Endourology; Dec. 2018; vol. 32(12). |
Lai, et al: “RIRS with Vacuum-Assisted Ureteral Access Sheath versus MPCNL for the Treatment of 2-4cm Renal Stone”, BioMed Research International 2020; vol. 2020, Article ID 8052013, 8 pages. |
Leveillee, et al., “Impressive Performance: New Disposable Digital Ureteroscope Allows for Extreme Lower Pole Access and Use of 365 um Holmium Laser Fiber”, Journal of Endourology Case Reports; Jun. 1, 2016; vol. 2(1), pp. 114-116. |
Li, et al., “A Novel Semirigid Ureterorenoscope with Vacuum Suctioning System for Management of Single Proximal Ureteral and Renal Pelvic Stones: An Initial Experience”, Journal of Endourology; Dec. 2018; vol. 32(12), pp. 1154-1159, 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 18/090,802, 29 pages. |
Non-final office action mailed Aug. 9, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/966,856, 40 pages. |
Non-final office action mailed Aug. 9, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/489,723; 25 pages. |
Non-final office action mailed Aug. 9, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 18/091,308; 27 pages. |
Non-final office action mailed Jan. 21, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/489,733, 6 pages. |
Peng, et al., “Suctioning flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the oblique supine lithotomy position and supine lithotomy position: a comparative retrospective study”, Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica, Dec. 2018; vol. 70(6), pp. 612-616. |
Portis, et al., “Endourology and Stones | Repeat Surgery After Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy With Attempted Complete Extraction of Fragments: Long-term Follow-up”, Urology Jun. 2015; vol. 85(6), pp. 1272-1278. |
Raman, et al., “Natural History of Residual Fragments Following Percutaneous Nephrostolithotomy”, Journal of Urology Mar. 2009; vol. 181(3), pp. 1163-1168. |
Rebuck, et al., “Endourology and Stones | The Natural History of Renal Stone Fragments Following Ureteroscopy”, Urology Mar. 2011; vol. 77(3), pp. 564-568. |
Scales, et al., “The impact of unplanned postprocedure visits in the management of patients with urinary stones”, Surgery May 2014; vol. 155(5), pp. 769-775. |
Schneider, et al: “In Vitro Evaluation of Stone Fragment Evacuation by Suction”, Journal of Endourology; Feb. 2021; vol. 35(2); pp. 187-191. |
Skolarikos, et al., “Urolithiasis/Endourology | Outcomes of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Solitary Renal Stones in the CROES URS Global Study”, Journal of Urology Jul. 2015; vol. 194(1), pp. 137-143. |
Villanueva, et al., “Silicone Catheters May Be Superior to Latex Catheters in Difficult Urethral Catheterization After Urethral Dilation”, Journal of Endourology 2011, vol. 25(5), pp. 841-844. |
Williams, et al: “A lumped-parameter model for kidney pressure during stone removal,” IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics; Oct. 2020; vol. 85(5); pp. 703-723. |
Williams, et al: “The Fluid Mechanics of Ureteroscope Irrigation”, Journal of Endourology; Jan. 2019; vol. 33(1); pp. 28-34. |
Williams, et al: “Cavity Flow Characteristics and Applications to Kidney Stone Removal,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics 2020; vol. 902; A16. |
Williams, et al: “Effects of Geometry on Resistance in Elliptical Pipe Flows,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics 2020; vol. 891; A4-1. |
Williams, et al: “Shape optimisation for faster washout in recirculating flows,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics 2021; vol. 914; A37. |
Zanetti, et al: “Vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a new perspective in fragments clearance and intrarenal pressure control”, World Journal of Urology 2021; vol. 39; pp. 1717-1723. |
Zeng, et al., “Modified Access Sheath for Continuous Flow Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: A Preliminary Report of a Novel Concept and Technique”, Journal of Endourology Sep. 2016; vol. 30(9), pp. 992-996. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20240423715 A1 | Dec 2024 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63411568 | Sep 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 18373229 | Sep 2023 | US |
Child | 18827597 | US |