This application is a 35 USC 371 application of PCT/EP2008/054830 filed on 22 Apr. 2008.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a tool holder, in particular for a chisel hammer and/or rotary hammer.
2. Description of the Prior Art
For receiving and axially locking drilling or chiseling tools in percussively operated power tools, various tool holders are known. Tool holders of the kind described among other places in German Patent Disclosure DE 10 2005 015100 A1 have a tool receptacle for receiving a cylindrical shaft, introduced through an insertion opening, of a tool insert. In the cylindrical circumferential surface of the shaft, two diametrically opposed detent indentations are provided. The tool holder also has a locking device, which includes a locking element, a blocking element, and a restoring element.
Locking of the tool insert in the tool receptacle is done automatically upon insertion. Here the locking element is displaced axially, counter to the restoring element acted upon by restoring force—usually implemented by a prestressed restoring spring—in the direction of the housing of the power tool until such time as it can deflect radially behind the blocking element into a deflection chamber defined by the restoring element. As the tool insert is pushed in farther, the locking element can then plunge radially into one of the detent indentations provided for it in the shaft of the tool insert and is thrust again in the axial direction to beneath the blocking element by the axially prestressed restoring element.
By axial displacement of the blocking element away from the position of repose defined by the restoring force and a contact face, the locking element can emerge radially from the detent indentation, so that the tool insert can be removed from the tool receptacle by pulling on the tool insert.
In all operating states, the tool locking means must ensure a secure hold of the tool insert in the tool receptacle.
Particularly at the transition from the hammering state to the idling state of the power tool, strong forces on the tool axis defined by the tool insert and oriented in the direction away from the power tool occur, which speed up the tool insert. This thus-caused sudden motion of the tool insert must be absorbed by the locking element and the motion must be stopped. In the process, the locking element is subjected to both axially and radially heavy loads.
Because of the constantly increasing hammering power of power tools, the thus-increasing loads on the locking element cause accelerated wear to components of the locking device—particularly of the locking element. Because of the sudden type of load, the vibratable locking device is additionally caused to vibrate, and the vibration adversely affects the load distribution.
A tool holder of the invention has a tool receptacle as well as a locking device with two locking elements, one blocking element and one restoring element. The two locking elements, in a structurally simple and economical way, enhance the safety of use and lengthen the service life of the locking device. The restoring element of the invention upon insertion of the shaft of the tool insert into the tool receptacle exerts different forces on the locking elements. As a result, it can be attained that despite the increased locking action by the two locking elements, the user need not expend increased force when changing tool inserts.
By means of an axial contact face located on the inner jacket face of the blocking element, the radial motion of the locking elements is limited effectively and at the same time economically.
An axially displaceable restoring element allows an expanded radial motion of the locking elements. As a result, especially sturdy unlocking of the locking device is attained for the sake of inserting the tool insert.
A preferred embodiment of the restoring element has an elastic element and a holding element. The elastic element generates a restoring force while the holding element carries the restoring force onward to the blocking element and the locking elements. By means of this construction, especially economical production of the restoring element is attained.
In an especially economical way, the elastic element can be embodied as a spring.
An especially advantageous embodiment of the elastic element is obtained by the use of an elastic damping element. The latter can either by itself or in combination with a spring on the one hand furnish the requisite restoring force for locking and on the other act in damping fashion on the vibration of the locking device that is induced by the sudden operating loads.
By means of the aforementioned characteristics of the tool holder of the invention, which enhance the sturdiness of the locking of the tool insert, greater locking forces are initially attained. A restoring element of the invention with a contact shoulder and an expanded shoulder region ensures great ease of use when changing tool inserts. The contact shoulder is braced on the blocking element. By means of the restoring force of the restoring element, the blocking element is held in its axial position via the contact shoulder. The expanded shoulder region of the invention creates two unequal deflection chambers for the locking elements. The locking elements emerge radially into the deflection chambers during the insertion of the tool insert, and the unequal shape of the deflection chambers leads to a different expenditure of force on the individual locking elements. Thus in a simple, robust way, the expenditure of force during the insertion of the tool insert into the tool holder is limited.
Economical production and easy mounting of a restoring element can be attained by means of an asymmetrically annular and in particular asymmetrically conical shaping of the expanded shoulder region. The asymmetrical shape defines the unequal deflection chambers for the locking elements.
An alternative embodiment of the expanded shoulder region with two tongues permits especially economical production. The tongues are inclined at different angles W1 and W2 to the tool axis defined by the tool insert. As a result, two unequal deflection chambers for the locking elements are defined.
In both embodiments of the expanded shoulder region, the entire restoring element upon insertion of the tool insert executes a motion axially and/or in tilting fashion relative to the surrounding elements of the tool holder that receive the locking device. As a result, the locking device and the elements receiving it are mechanically loaded and subjected to wear. A restoring element according to the invention in which the expanded shoulder region has two tongues which exert different elastic forces on the various locking elements limits the number of elements exposed to a relative motion in an effective and at the same time economical way.
The vibration induced by the sudden loads on the locking device is propagated axially along the tool axis both in the direction of the end of the shaft and in the opposite direction. A frontal damping element disposed around the tool receptacle in the direction of the insertion opening has an advantageous effect on the vibration behavior and hence the wear behavior of the locking device.
A combination of a frontal damping element and of a damping element as an elastic element of the locking device has an especially advantageous effect with regard to vibration damping.
The invention will be described in further detail below in two exemplary embodiments in conjunction with the associated drawings, in which:
The tool holder 10 according to the invention, shown in
The tool holder 10 includes a tool receptacle 20, which is tubular in its interior; a protective cap 22; and an actuation element 24. The actuation element 24 is preferably embodied as an actuation sleeve 26. The tool receptacle 20 serves to receive the cylindrical shaft 12, inserted through an insertion opening 28 on the face end of the tool holder 10. The tool holder 10 furthermore has a locking device 30 for the cylindrical shaft 12 of the tool insert 14.
In accordance with the invention, the locking device 30 includes two locking elements 32, 34, one blocking element 36, and one restoring element 38. In a preferred embodiment, the locking elements 32, 34 are embodied as locking balls, but other forms, in particular such as locking rollers or locking pegs, are also possible.
In the preferred embodiment of the tool holder 10 of the invention shown in
The holding element 40 of the invention is distinguished by a contact shoulder 44 and an expanded shoulder region 46. The expanded shoulder region 46 together with a radial contact face 48 on the blocking element 36 forms two unequal deflection chambers 50, 52. The two receiving legs 54, 56 of the expanded shoulder region 46 are inclined at different angles of inclination W1 and W2 relative to the tool axis 58 defined by the tool insert 14.
The elastic element 42 is disposed such that, between a reference face 59 oriented toward the face-end insertion opening 28 and the holding element 40, it generates a restoring force FR that separates the holding element 40 and the reference face 59. As a result of this restoring force FR, the contact shoulder 44 of the holding element 40 is pressed against the radial contact face 48 of the blocking element 36, thereby prestressing the blocking element in its axial position with this restoring force FR.
The tool receptacle 20, at some distance from the face-end insertion opening 28, has two diametrically opposed locking recesses 60, 62. By means of these locking recesses 60, 62, a respective locking element 32, 34 can be made to engage a respective detent indentation 16, 18 of the introduced cylindrical shaft 12 of the tool insert 14. The locking recesses 60, 62 are embodied such that the locking elements 32, 34 cannot pass all the way through the tool receptacle 20.
Also in
The locking elements 32, 34 are radially bounded by a blocking element 36 by means of two axial contact faces 72. The blocking element 36 is disposed in the circumferential direction around the tool receptacle 20. With the aid of the actuating element 24, 26, the blocking element 36 can be displaced counter to the restoring force FR axially away from the face-end insertion opening 28 along the tool axis 58 relative to the tool receptacle 20. As a result, the two unlocking recesses 64, 66 are positioned in their axial position around the locking elements 32, 34 in such a way that the locking element can emerge radially from the locking recesses 60, 62. The emergence of the locking elements 32, 34 unlocks the tool insert 14.
Upon introduction of the cylindrical shaft 12 of the tool insert 14 through the face-end insertion opening 28 into the tool receptacle 20, the locking elements 32, 34 are initially blocked in their radial motion initially by the axial contact faces 72. As a result, the locking elements 32, 34 are pressed axially against the receiving legs 54, 56 of the expanded shoulder region 46. Because of the steeper angle of inclination W1 of the receiving leg 54, it is the first locking element 32 that first comes into contact with that leg. By further introduction of the tool insert 14, the holding element 40 is now axially displaced and tilted by the unilateral contact with the tool axis 58. As a result, the first deflection chamber 50 is uncovered for the radial emergence of the first locking element 32. The first locking element 32 thus no longer acts to block the introduction of the tool insert 14. Since the opposed receiving leg 56 is not yet in contact with the associated second locking element 34, the contact shoulder 44 is pressed on that side against the radial contact face 48 by the restoring force FR, and the blocking element 36 is held in position.
If the second locking element 34 is now, by continued insertion of the tool insert 14, thrust against the second receiving leg 56 with a shallower angle of inclination W2 of the holding element 40, thereby axially displacing the holding element, then this locking element 34 can now emerge into the second deflection chamber 52. The blocking element 36 is now held in position by the combination of the contact shoulder 44 on the side of the first locking element 32 and that locking element 32 with the axial restoring force FR of the elastic element 42.
Upon further insertion of the tool insert 14, finally, the locking elements 32, 34 can plunge into the detent indentations 16, 18 of the cylindrical shaft 12 radially to the tool axis 58. The contact shoulder 44 of the holding element 40 is thrust back into the position of repose axially in the direction of the face-end insertion opening 28 by the restoring force FR of the elastic element 42, 42a of the restoring element 38. The blocking element 36, now seated around the locking elements 32, 34, by means of its axial contact faces 72, prevents a radial deflection of the locking elements 32, 34 and thus prevents unlocking of the tool insert 14. The loads occurring in operation are thus distributed to two locking elements, which act to the symmetrically about the tool axis 58.
In the following drawings
Possible expansions of the elastic element 142 realized in
The tool holder 110 according to the invention shown in
As is immediately apparent, the two damping elements 142b, 174 can be used independently of one another. The exemplary embodiments described represent merely especially simple versions of the characteristics of the invention. For instance, advantageous embodiments can be obtained among other ways by means of having the damping element or elements 142b, 174 in two, three or more parts. Preferably, the damping elements are made from elastomers or elastic foams. Advantageous refinements by combinations with spring elements are also conceivable.
The holding element 240 thus defined can be expanded in a way that is obvious to one skilled in the art by means of further characteristics, such as an element for mistake-free oriented assembly or by an interrupted and/or structured surface.
In a first version, the guide tongues 378, 380 are formed by two different angles of inclination W1 and W2 to the tool axis 358. The guide tongues 378, 380 act in this way as receiving legs 354, 356 of the expanded shoulder region 346 of the holding element 340. Thus the receiving legs 354, 356 achieve an identical function of the holding element 340 to that of the exemplary embodiment of
A second version of a holding element 340 as defined by the second embodiment is characterized by different elastic properties of the two guide tongues 378, 380 that are inclined to the tool axis 358. Because of the different elastic properties, the guide tongues 378, 380, in their function as receiving legs 354, 356, act with different elastic forces on the locking elements 332, 334. In this kind of version, a contact shoulder 344 that is permanently in contact with the blocking element can be attained. As a result, a relative motion and hence wear between the contact shoulder 344 of the holding element 340, the blocking element, and other elements of the tool holder are avoided.
Further versions of a holding element 340 having at least two guide tongues 378, 380 are possible, in particular by combining the characteristics of the two versions described in the foregoing sections.
The embodiments shown in
The foregoing relates to the preferred exemplary embodiments of the invention, it being understood that other variants and embodiments thereof are possible within the spirit and scope of the invention, the latter being defined by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2007 028 486 | Jun 2007 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2008/054830 | 4/22/2008 | WO | 00 | 12/18/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/155152 | 12/24/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4107949 | Wanner et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4434859 | Rumpp et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4491444 | Rumpp et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4824298 | Lippacher et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
5601388 | Lauterwald | Feb 1997 | A |
5971403 | Yahagi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6241026 | Wache et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6651990 | Higasi et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6669206 | Hanke | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6745850 | Hahn | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6854740 | Baumann et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7032683 | Hetcher et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7168504 | Hetcher et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7258349 | Frauhammer et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7284622 | Hahn | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7712746 | Manschitz et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7997837 | Furusawa et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8066290 | Kleine et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8172235 | Furusawa et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
20020125652 | Hanke | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030025281 | Higasi et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030047888 | Hahn | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040245731 | Frauhammer et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050016745 | Hahn | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060192350 | Kleine et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070024013 | Hauptmann et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080197583 | Furusawa et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102005015100 | Oct 2006 | DE |
1293303 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1695797 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1958734 | Aug 2008 | EP |
2410212 | Jul 2005 | GB |
2007036907 | Feb 2007 | JP |
03022531 | Mar 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100176561 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |