1. Field of the Invention
The invention generally relates to rotary driven cylindrical cutters and scarifiers for use in earth-working, mining, or other in situ disintegration of hard materials. The invention is particularly directed to a tool holder for such a machine.
2. Background of the Invention
In general, roadway mining or planing equipment includes a rotary driven cylindrical comminuting drum which acts to scarify and to mine the top portion of the asphaltic road surface in situ. The rotary driven drum includes flighting on the drum which acts to collect and move the mined material toward the center of the drum where it can be removed. Often the mined material is then remixed with additional bituminous material and thereafter re-deposited as a newly formed smooth asphaltic surface. The rotary driven drums can also be used in other types of mining including subterranean extraction of desirable minerals and ores.
In some prior art devices of this type, the flighting is itself formed from a plurality of cutting bit support members which are connected to the curved surface of the cutting drum by bolts which pass from the upper surface of the flighting downward into the drum to engage threaded openings in the drum. Alternatively, the cutting bit support members can be welded to the drum or to the flighting.
A plurality of flight blocks can be arranged end-to-end so as to form a substantially continuous helical flighting. The top surface of the helical flighting is generally elevated above the curved surface of the drum. The flight blocks can include angled openings into which conventional tool holders are received. Each tool holder has a recess to receive a cutting tool.
In use, the tool holders may vibrate and otherwise move within the flight blocks. Particularly in the presence of abrasive debris from the roadway mining operation, the vibration and movement of the tool holders can act to enlarge the slot within the flight block receiving the tool holder to such an extent that the tool holder is no longer retained. Additionally, the presence of dust and debris that is being churned up by the cutting tool itself can get pushed into the flight block, between the wall of the slot and the tool holder. This debris causes added and accelerated wear on the tool holder and flight block.
When the tool holder is no longer held securely in the flight block, it then becomes necessary to remove the old flight block, usually with the aid of a cutting torch, and to weld a new flight block in its place. Again, this repair job is difficult to do in the field and still achieve accurate alignment of the flight block on the flighting section. Misalignment of the flight block results in undesirable lateral forces on a new cutting tool which in turn results in very fast wear and ultimate failure of the replaced parts.
The vibration induced wear can also occur between the tool holders and the cutting tool itself. Some rotational movement of the cutting tool may be desirable to permit the cutting tool to suffer even wear. Any rotational movement of the tool can cause wear of the part holding the tool, whether the tool holder or any intermediate sleeve. It is desirable to retain the cutting tool in the tool holder so long as the cutting surface of the cutting tool remains satisfactory to perform the desired cutting action. If a cutting tool experiences too much wear it may be ejected from or drop from the tool holder. If the tool holder experiences too much wear in surfaces confronting the cutting tool, the tool holder may not be able to retain even a new cutting tool, thus mandating the replacement of the tool holder. Thus, it is desirable to accommodate some measure of wear between the cutting tool and the tool holder while minimizing the wear on the tool holder itself.
Thus, there remains a need for a tool holder that can be used with standard flight blocks, and will resist the intrusion of debris between the tool holder and the cutting tool and will retain the cutting tool for a longer time. There remains a further need for a tool holder that can accommodate or compensate for some measure of wear of the cutting tool in relation to the tool holder.
The present invention relates to a tool holder for a scarifying milling machine. In one aspect, the tool holder includes a body portion that is dimensioned to fit closely within a slot formed within a flight block. A head portion is positioned at a distal end of the body portion. The head portion includes a recess that is adapted to receive a cutting tool. The recess is oriented such that the cutting to is held in a rotationally forward orientation. A flange is positioned adjacent the head portion and extends from the body portion in a rotationally forward direction. The flange is adapted to deflect debris away from the interface of the flight block and the tool holder and to prevent debris from entering between the flight block and the tool holder.
In another aspect, the flange is angled away from the recess to facilitate the flow of debris away from the cutting tool.
In still another aspect, the flange is angled to one side of the body of the tool holder to facilitate the flow of debris away from the recess and to one side of the tool holder.
In yet another aspect, the tool holder includes a threaded bore extending from the recess to an outer surface of the head portion. A threaded set screw is positioned within the threaded bore. The set screw can directly engage, or cause another member within the threaded bore to engage, a portion of a cutting tool positioned within the recess to secure the cutting tool therein.
In yet a further aspect, the engagement can be such as to minimize any motion between the tool holder an a collar surrounding the cutting tool, so that any wear due to movement of the cutting tool occurs on the cutting tool and the surrounding collar.
The above, as well as other advantages of the present invention, will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment when considered in the light of the accompanying drawings.
Referring to
Each flight block 16 has a slot 20 formed therein that is adapted to receive and support a tool holder 22. Referring to
The body portion 24 is preferably dimensioned to fit closely within the slot 20 formed within the flight block 16. The body portion 24 can be generally rectangular, but any shape adapted to fit within the slot 20 in a particular flight block 16 is appropriate. The head portion 26 is positioned at a distal end of the body portion 24. A recess 30 is formed within the head portion 26 and is adapted to receive and support a cutting tool 32.
Typically, it is desirable to have the cutting tool 32 presented in a rotationally forward orientation relative to the cutting drum 10. Therefore, the recess 30 formed within the head portion 26 is oriented at an angle 34 relative to a longitudinal axis 36 of the tool holder 22. In this way, the cutting tool 32 is presented in a rotationally forward orientation.
The flange 28 extends from the body portion 24 adjacent the head portion 26. The flange 28 extends in a rotationally forward direction, from a front side 38 of the tool holder 22. The flange 28 is adapted to deflect debris that is churned up by the cutting tool 32. Referring to
Referring to
Referring again to
Referring to
The collar 74 can have a gap 76 formed therein to allow the collar 74 to be expanded or compressed. This gap 76 allows the collar 74 to be expanded when placed onto the post 68, as the collar 74 must fit over the lip 72 formed on the distal end 70. The collar 74 can have a pre-formed shape such that once the collar 74 is placed onto the post 68, an outer diameter 78 of the collar 74 is slightly larger than an inner diameter of the recess 30 within the tool holder 22. In this way, once the cutting tool 32 is placed within the tool holder 22, friction between the outer diameter 78 of the collar 74 and the inner diameter 80 of the recess 30 within the tool holder 22 will keep the cutting tool 32 held within the recess 30, as shown in
Further, the cutting tool 32 is not held immobile within the collar 74. The lip 72 formed at the distal end 70 of the post 68 contacts the collar 74, and the collar 74 is frictionally held within the recess 30, thereby preventing the cutting tool 32 from being axially removed from the recess 30. A force large enough to overcome the frictional contact between the collar 74 and the inner diameter 80 of the recess 30 would be necessary to remove the cutting tool 32 from the recess 30. However, the cutting tool 32 is not completely restricted from rotating within the collar 74. Therefore, as the cutting tip 64 of the cutting tool 32 wears, the cutting tool 32 can, and will rotate such that the cutting tip 64 will wear more evenly. This increases the life of the cutting tool 32.
Referring again to
Over time, during use, the cutting tool 32 and the inner surface of the collar 74 will wear, thus causing the collar 74 to collapse inwardly away from the inner surface of recess 30. To maintain engagement of the cutting tool 32 within the recess 30, the threaded set screw 62 can be adjusted inwardly against the outer diameter 78 of the collar 74 to more tightly hold the cutting tool 32 within the recess 30. Alternatively, a spring or other biasing element can cause a contact element to maintain sufficient force on the collar 74 to inhibit any motion between the collar 74 and the recess 30. Further, this structure of the set screw 62 with or without a biasing element such as a spring acting on a further contacting element contacting the collar 74 surrounding the cutting tool post 68 can be employed with a variety of tool holders other than that illustrated in the present Figures.
In accordance with the provisions of the patent statutes, the present invention has been described in what is considered to represent its preferred embodiment. However, it should be noted that the invention can be practiced otherwise than as specifically illustrated and described.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4337980 | Krekeler | Jul 1982 | A |
4480873 | Latham | Nov 1984 | A |
4697850 | Tuneblom | Oct 1987 | A |
4871213 | Hanson | Oct 1989 | A |
5016943 | Wirtgen | May 1991 | A |
5052757 | Latham | Oct 1991 | A |
5078540 | Jakob et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5098167 | Latham | Mar 1992 | A |
5186575 | Wirtgen | Feb 1993 | A |
5303458 | Sheehan et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5536073 | Sulosky et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5582468 | Latham | Dec 1996 | A |
5639180 | Sulosky et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5647641 | Suloxky et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5842747 | Winchester | Dec 1998 | A |
5884979 | Latham | Mar 1999 | A |
6331035 | Montgomery, Jr. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6357832 | Sollami | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6382733 | Parrott | May 2002 | B1 |
6546977 | Monyak et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6585327 | Sollami | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6644755 | Kammerer | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6692083 | Latham | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6832818 | Luciano | Dec 2004 | B2 |
20060119165 | Holl et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070245253 A1 | Oct 2007 | US |