This application is based on and claims priority to Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-140798, filed on Jul. 31, 2019, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present disclosure relates to a tool-mounting-state estimation system and a machine tool.
There are well-known machine tools in which the tapered external surface of a tool is brought into close contact with the tapered internal surface of a spindle of the machine tool through the operation of a draw bar provided on the spindle, thus fixing the tool to the spindle (refer to, for example, Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, Publication No. 2015-9283).
One aspect of this disclosure is directed to a tool-mounting-state estimation system including: a measuring tool including a body section having a tapered external surface common with a tapered external surface of a tool and a vibrating source that is mounted on the body section and that generates vibration; a sensor that is provided on a spindle and that detects vibration, wherein the measuring tool is drawn into the spindle so that the tapered external surface of the measuring tool comes into close contact with a tapered internal surface of the spindle, and the vibration is generated by the vibrating source and propagates towards the spindle via the tapered external surface and the tapered internal surface; and an estimation unit that estimates a mounting state of the tool on a basis of the vibration detected by the sensor.
A tool-mounting-state estimation system 1 and a machine tool 100 according to one embodiment of the present disclosure will now be described with reference to the drawings.
As shown in
The machine tool main body 110 includes: a tool magazine 111 for accommodating a plurality of tools 150 and a measuring tool 140 (described later); a spindle 112 on which one of the tools 150 or the measuring tool 140 in the tool magazine 111 is mounted and that performs machining or measurement; and a tool exchange device 113 for exchanging the tool 150 or the measuring tool 140 between the spindle 112 and the tool magazine 111.
The tool magazine 111 includes a disc-shaped turret 115 having a plurality of grips 114 that are arranged in the circumferential direction with a space therebetween. The turret 115 is revolvable about a central axis line A, and each of the grips 114 detachably holds a tool 150. The measuring tool 140 is held, in the same manner as each of the tools 150, by one of the grips 114.
As shown in
As shown in
The tool exchange device 113 controls the turret 115 and the linear-motion mechanism 116. The turret 115 is supported by a support member 121 extending from the base 118 of the linear-motion mechanism 116 and is supported so as to be swivelable about a horizontal swiveling axial line B. A cam 122 is provided on a side surface of the spindle head 117, and the turret 115 includes a cam follower 123 that operates in conformance with the cam 122.
As shown in
By lowering the spindle head 117 in this state, the tool 150 or the measuring tool 140 is inserted into the spindle 112 such that the tapered external surface 141 or 151 of the tool 150 or the measuring tool 140 is brought into close contact with the tapered internal surface 112a of the spindle 112, and the tool 150 or the measuring tool 140 is then mounted on the spindle 112 through the operation of the draw bar 120. Then, as shown in
As shown in
As shown in
In a state in which the measuring tool 140 is mounted on the spindle 112, the vibration generated by the piezoelectric element 144 of the measuring tool 140 propagates to the spindle 112 via the tapered external surface 141 and the tapered internal surface 112a and is then detected by the sensor 2.
The arithmetic operation unit 3 is composed of a processor and a memory and, as shown in
The estimation unit 5 estimates the mounting state of the measuring tool 140 on the basis of the vibration detected by the sensor 2.
More specifically, the estimation unit 5 performs frequency analysis on the vibration detected by the sensor 2 and calculates, as the degree of close contact between the tapered external surface 141 and the tapered internal surface 112a, the ratio of the amplitude of vibration having the same frequency as the input vibration generated by the piezoelectric element 144 with respect to the amplitude of the input vibration.
In addition, the estimation unit 5 also calculates a resonance frequency obtained as a result of the frequency analysis.
The determination unit 6 is composed of a processor and a memory and determines whether the calculated degree of close contact is less than or equal to a predetermined tolerance.
In addition, the determination unit 6 determines whether or not the calculated resonance frequency is below a threshold in response to a predetermined resonance frequency. The predetermined resonance frequency can be measured in advance by means of the measuring tool 140 that is mounted in a state in which the draw bar 120 and the tapered internal surface 112a are not degraded.
In the case where the calculated degree of close contact is less than or equal to the tolerance, the tapered external surface 141 of the measuring tool 140 and the tapered internal surface 112a of the spindle 112 are not brought into sufficiently close contact with each other. Thus, it is expected that a sufficiently high degree of close contact will not also be achieved when a tool 150 is mounted instead of the measuring tool 140.
Also, the cause of a decrease in the degree of close contact can be estimated by determining whether or not the resonance frequency is below the threshold.
More specifically, in the case where the degree of close contact decreases and the resonance frequency also decreases, it can be estimated that there is high probability of the drawing force having decreased due to deterioration of the draw bar 120. On the other hand, in the case where the degree of close contact decreases but the resonance frequency does not decrease, it can be estimated that there is high probability of the spindle 112 having the tapered internal surface 112a being worn down or having chips bitten between the tapered surfaces.
When the determination unit 6 determines that the degree of close contact is less than or equal to the tolerance, the alarm unit 4 reports this. The alarm unit 4 may be anything, including a monitor, a speaker, a lighting device, etc.
Also, as a result of the alarm unit 4 reporting a determination result made by the determination unit 6, an operator can become aware of a decrease in the degree of close contact between the tapered external surface 141 or 151 and the tapered internal surface 112a, as well as a rough cause for the decrease, thereby preventing machining from continuing in a state in which the tool 150 is not securely mounted on the spindle 112.
In other words, according to the tool-mounting-state estimation system 1 and the machine tool 100 of this embodiment, the measuring tool 140, which is normally mounted on the turret 115, can be quickly mounted on the spindle 112, as required or periodically, thus facilitating the measurement of the degree of close contact. This allows simple and early-stage detection of a deterioration in the mounting state of a tool 150 on the spindle 112. In addition, an advantage is afforded in that by analyzing vibration detected by the sensor 2, it is possible to determine whether deterioration in the mounting state has been caused by wear of the tapered internal surface 112a of the spindle 112 or biting of chips, or deterioration of the draw bar 120.
Note that although this embodiment has been described by way of an example where the piezoelectric element 144 is used as the vibrating source, instead of this, a hammering device may be used.
In this embodiment, when the determination unit 6 determines that the degree of close contact calculated by the estimation unit 5 is less than or equal to the predetermined tolerance, the alarm unit 4 reports this. Instead of this, the present invention may include a time estimation unit (not shown in the figure), which stores the degree of close contact calculated by the estimation unit 5 each time it is calculated and which estimates a time at which the degree of close contact will become less than or equal to the tolerance on the basis of an over-time change in the stored degree of close contact.
The time estimation unit affords an advantage in that a measure for improving the mounting state can be taken at an earlier stage because the time estimation unit can estimate the time at which the degree of close contact will become less than or equal to the tolerance before machining accuracy decreases as a result of that time being actually reached.
In addition, the tolerance and threshold can be set to arbitrary values.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2019-140798 | Jul 2019 | JP | national |