Patent Grant
7694542
The present invention relates in general to rotatable shaft combination lock mechanisms suitable for use in, for example, doors, safes, or portable padlocks. Typically, such rotatable shaft combination lock mechanisms include a plurality of gated tumbler wheels, but may also include other mechanisms which are actuated by rotation.
Conventional locks utilizing lock mechanisms of the general class known as combination locks typically include three or more tumbler wheels which are loosely journaled in coaxial longitudinally spaced relation for rotation on a spindle or drive shaft within the lock housing, where the drive shaft is accessed through the wall of the housing. Most typically, an indexed and finger manipulable wheel mechanism, or dial, is positioned on the outer surface of the housing. The wheel mechanism may be utilized to provide the required rotations of the drive shaft and tumbler wheels to unlatch the lock.
The external dial typically provides the operator with means to manually manipulate the internal drive shaft and tumbler wheels in accordance with a known code, or combination. The proper manipulation of the dial results in the unlatching and unlocking of the lock. In the three-tumbler-wheel system commonly used in the art, the operator generally rotates the external dial in a clockwise direction through angular positions to a first desired point, commonly referenced by a numeral, then rotates the external dial in a counterclockwise direction to a second desired point, commonly referenced by a numeral, and finally rotates the external dial again in a clockwise direction to a third desired point, again commonly referenced by a numeral. Following this typical procedure, the lock mechanism is unlatched and the lock may be opened.
Existing combination lock mechanisms are designed to be human friendly by including the discussed externally readable and finger manipulable dial. Notwithstanding the external indexing, the tolerances required for unlatching conventional locks are left quite loose, to further ease use by average persons. In a typical combination lock operable by a finger manipulable dial, the locking mechanism clearances are such that a slight over or under rotation of the dial will not be fatal to operation of the lock. Rather, clearances are designed to account for slight errors in precision.
For example, if a conventional combination lock has the combination 10-22-17, the lock is typically designed to be opened when a user rotates the dial clockwise three turns to the indexed numeral 10, counterclockwise two turns to the indexed numeral 22, and again clockwise one turn to the indexed numeral 17. However, it is conventional that tolerances are built in the lock mechanism such that rotations may be permitted to be off several digits, and the lock will still open. As an example, using the combination lock with the combination of 10-22-17, rotational input of 10-21-17 will likely open the lock. In fact, each of the rotations may be ceased or stopped at a digit which is “off” by more than only one digit, for example an input of 8-20-19 will likely still open the lock, even though each of the stopping points is “off” by two indexed positions.
There are several reasons for this built in sloppiness. These reasons most often have to do with human limitations regarding to dexterity, memory, and patience, which are all interrelated in some ways.
Regarding dexterity, even the most dexterous of humans are only capable of a certain level of positioning accuracy. In a typical peripherally gated combination lock, the lock manufacturers place a single gate at a location on the periphery of each wheel. This gate is sized to accept a side bar when the correct combination is entered. However, to account for the relative lack of dexterity exhibited by human manipulation, the gate is often much larger than the width of the side bar. If the gates were sized to include only a slight tolerance with the side bar, the rotational accuracy for opening a lock would be too tight for typical human manipulation. Of course, some humans may still be able to manipulate the lock for at least one indexed number accurately, but it would likely take a tremendous amount of time, effort, and concentration. That time, effort, and concentration weighs against the patience of the person. Thus, locks have heretofore been manufactured with gates which allow for a large tolerance with the side bar.
Also, the person's memory may fade over the time required to enter the rotational inputs required to unlatch the lock. For example, again using the combination above, if a person had to enter exactly 10-22-17, and no inaccuracies were tolerated, the person would have to spin the dial clockwise three times and stop precisely on the 10 position. The person would then have to rotate the dial counterclockwise two times and stop precisely on the 22 position. The concentration required to stop precisely on the second position may cause the person to forget the third digit of the combination, or forget the number or direction of rotations required for the final number of the combination. Other memory based complications may also interfere, such as external distinctions. Lock manufacturers thus build in a level of sloppiness that permits quick manipulation of the combination lock, for example by permitting the lock to unlatch even if a user is “off” by several digits.
Regarding memory, most conventional combination locks include three wheels, requiring the user to memorize a three-number combination. An example is the 10-22-17 combination discussed. If, however, the number of tumbler wheels were increased, the number of digits in the combination would be increased proportionally. Although this would permit more secure locks, the limits of human memory have contributed in discouraging the use of large numbers of disks.
Presently, among the most complicated of conventional locks are those used on bank vaults. Such locks may include four tumbler wheels, requiring a user to remember a four-number combination. Manipulation of such a lock taxes the abilities of users. The additional tumbler wheel not only requires the user to remember an additional number, but also increases the number of rotations required to open the lock. In the four-disk example, a user would have to first rotate the external dial four times in a clockwise direction, three times in a counter clockwise direction, two times in a clockwise direction, and finally one time in a counterclockwise direction, for a total of ten rotations. This is a lot of turns for a person to count while still remembering the combination and blocking outside interferences. Only in the most secure locations, bank vaults, is this tolerated. Most conventional locks are of the three-disk variety.
It is estimated that present commercial locks of the three-disk variety comprise 85% of the market while four-disk locks make up the remaining 15%. The greatest number of disks known to have been attempted in a commercial product is five, by Joseph L. Hall of Cincinnati, Ohio, in the mid-1800s. It is believed that this lock was only used for a short period of time due to the problems associated with manipulating five disks. No locks are presently known to embody five or more disks. Heretofore, the beneficial increase in security offered by a lock with greater than four disks has been severely outweighed by the difficulties associated with manipulating such a lock.
In addition to the added security provided by heretofore unheard of disk numbers, combination locks of the present invention also feature numerous other improvements, as will be discussed. One such improvement is the provision of much tighter tolerances within each tumbler wheel. Whereas conventional locks allow for a loose fit between the peripheral gate and the side bar, locks constructed in accordance with the present invention permit much tighter tolerances. Other of these improvements include the provision of a propriety (or non-propriety) female interface within the body of the cylinder lock which may only be engaged by a tool and is not finger manipulable. Accordingly, there may be no external dial. There may also be no visible demarcations on the lock housing associated with the combination.
The tool operated lock of the present invention therefore solves the inherent problems associated with limited human dexterity, memory, and patience by providing for a combination lock mechanism which may be manipulated and opened by a tool, or by a human in conjunction with particular tools. The functional arrangement of, and interrelationship between, the lock and the tool provides for security features, flexibility, and control not previously available from conventional locks. The tool operated combination lock of the present invention generally operates under the principles known in the combination lock art, with the additions of tighter clearances, greater numbers of disks (or tumbler wheels), and other improvements that could not have been realized in a practical sense until the novel mating of the combination lock with the speed and precision of the motorized tool. Tools for use with such locks are also disclosed herein.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, a combination lock may comprise a casing having a notch in an interior surface thereof, the casing having a longitudinal centerline, a drive shaft mounted along the longitudinal centerline of the casing, a drive disk driven by the drive shaft, the drive disk having a gate, at least five disks, each of the disks rotatable about the drive shaft upon a driving force initiated by the drive disk, each of the disks having a gate, a side bar adapted to be housed within the notch of the casing, the side bar adapted to exit the notch and enter the gates of the disks and the gate of the drive disk when the gates are rotated into alignment, a latch associated with the drive shaft, the latch rotatable between a locked position when the side bar is within the notch and an unlocked position when the sidebar is within the gates.
The combination lock may further comprise a mechanism to communicate with a tool adapted to engage the drive shaft of the lock to move the latch from the locked position to the unlocked position.
The communication mechanism may communicate information related to the identification of the combination lock.
The communication mechanism may be one of a radio frequency reference device, mote, contact memory button, optical bar code, alphanumeric designation, or magnetic strip.
The drive shaft may be housed within an outer housing.
The outer housing may provide no demarcations of rotational position of the drive shaft.
The drive shaft may be incapable of human manipulation.
The combination lock may further comprise a scrambler spring, the scrambler spring adapted to store energy upon rotation of the drive shaft and release the stored energy upon release of the drive shaft to rotate the drive shaft to a random position.
The combination lock may further comprise a registration component, the registration component adapted to mate with a corresponding registration component of a tool to provide the tool with a reference point for opening the lock.
In accordance with other aspects of the invention, a combination lock may comprise a lock core, the lock core comprising a plurality of rotatable disks and a drive shaft operable to rotate the disks, each of the disks having a gate, a side bar operative to enter the gates of the disks when the gates are rotated into alignment, a scrambler spring associated with the drive shaft, the scrambler spring operative to store potential energy when the drive shaft is rotated in a first direction, the scrambler spring releasing the potential energy by spinning the drive shaft in a second direction upon release of the drive shaft.
In accordance with still further aspects of the present invention, a system for locking and unlocking a component may comprise a lock adapted to lock a component, the lock capable of being opened by manipulation of a combination mechanism, the lock having a communication apparatus for communicating information related to the opening of the lock with a tool, a tool matable with the lock and adapted to open the lock by manipulation of the combination mechanism, the tool adapted to receive the communicated information related to the opening of the lock from the communication apparatus.
The communicated information may be the identification of the particular lock.
The communicated information may be the required degrees and directions of rotation required to open the combination lock.
The tool may further comprise a linking mechanism to link the tool electronically to a remote authority.
The tool may not operate to unlock the lock without authorization of the authority.
The tool may further comprise a location detection apparatus to determine the precise location of the tool, the remote authority adapted to authorize operation of the tool at least partially based on the precise location of the tool at the attempted time of operation.
The tool may further comprise at least one of a video camera, audio microphone, keypad, card reader, biometric device, or clock, wherein the authorization of the remote authority is at least partially based on information conveyed from the at least one of a video camera, audio microphone, keypad, card reader, biometric device, or clock.
The remote authority may record information related to the operation of the tool.
The tool may further comprise a tool registration element and the lock may further comprise a lock registration element, the tool registration element and the lock registration element adapted to mate such that the tool may be manipulated from a starting reference point.
In accordance with still further aspects of the present invention, a system for locking and unlocking may comprise a combination lock having a drive shaft adapted to be rotated in sequential clockwise and counterclockwise rotations in accordance with a predetermined pattern to open the lock, a tool adapted to couple directly with the drive shaft of the lock to provide the required clockwise and counterclockwise rotations necessary to open the lock.
The lock and the tool may communicate with each other electronically.
The system may further comprise a remote authority adapted to communicate with the tool, the remote authority capable of overseeing operation of the tool.
The drive shaft may be non finger manipulable.
The combination lock may further comprise an outer housing having an aperture, the drive shaft being located within the outer housing such that the coupling of the tool with the drive shaft occurs within the aperture
In accordance with additional aspects of the present invention, a method of opening a combination lock with a tool may comprise associating a tool having a user interface with a combination lock, manipulating the user interface of the tool such that the tool rotates portions of the lock through predetermined angular rotations until the lock unlocks, wherein the step of associating a tool with a combination lock places a portion of the tool within internal portions of the combination lock.
The lock may further comprise an apparatus for communicating information and the tool may include an apparatus for receiving the communicated information.
The tool may further comprise a communication mechanism adapted to communicate with a remote authority.
The tool may require authorization of the remote authority before rotating portions of the lock in response to manipulation of the user interface.
The combination lock may further comprise a rotatable shaft and the step of associating a tool with a combination lock may associate the tool directly with the rotatable shaft.
In accordance with still further aspects of the present invention, a tool for opening combination locks may comprise a motor, a lock interface associated with the motor such that the motor may rotate the lock interface, the lock interface adapted to communicate with a non finger manipulable rotation mechanism of a lock, a motor controller, the motor controller adapted to control the direction and extent of rotational operation of the motor, a power supply, the power supply supplying power to the tool, and a user interface, the user interface communicating with the motor controller.
The lock interface may be adapted to directly communicate with a drive shaft of the lock.
The lock interface may be adapted to communicate with the non finger manipulable rotation mechanism of the lock located within an internal portion of the lock.
The motor and the power supply may be at least partially contained within a first housing.
The microprocessor may be associated with a second housing, the second housing adapted to communicate directly with the first housing.
The first and second housings may be separable.
The tool may further comprise a microprocessor and a sensor, the sensor adapted to obtain information, the microprocessor adapted to analyze the information received by the sensor, wherein the microprocessor communicates with the motor controller to permit or deny operation of the tool based on the received information.
The information may be one of information related to the location of the tool, information related to the user of the tool, information related to the combination lock, or temporal information.
The tool may further comprise an alignment mechanism adapted to mate with a reference associated with the lock to provide a reference point of rotation for the lock interface.
In yet a further aspect of the invention, a method of opening a plurality of locks with a single tool may comprise attaching a tool having a user interface to a non finger manipulable portion of a first lock, entering information pertaining to the first lock into the tool, wherein the tool may open the first lock, attaching the tool to a non finger manipulable portion of a second lock, entering information pertaining to the second lock into the tool, wherein the tool may open the second lock.
The step of entering information related to the lock may be conducted through the user interface.
The first lock and the tool may be adapted to communicate information to each other, the information being related to the opening of the first lock.
The tool may include a memory module adapted to store information relative to the opening of locks.
The step of entering information related to the first lock may be conducted via communication mechanisms between the first lock and the tool.
In still further aspects of the invention, means may be provided to manipulate the internal tumbler wheels or disks of a combination lock in accordance with the appropriate combination, which may be known or unknown to the operator, by a motor driven tool. The combination necessary to drive the tool in the directions and positions appropriate for the disks of a given lock may be provided by means of a signal; electronic, electromagnetic, optical, or otherwise, from a preferably secure identification source. The signal may be obtained from a radio frequency reference device (RFID), a “mote” (a new class of interactive microelectronic devices also commonly referred to as smart dust or wireless sensing networks), a contact memory button (CMB) (a non-powered read/write memory device capable of transferring data by contact), an optical bar code, a magnetic strip, or similar medium, as will be discussed further.
In other embodiments, the lock may be provided with an alphanumeric designator corresponding to the lock's opening sequence. The tool may be provided with an optional character recognition system which may then read the alphanumeric characters to associate the tool with the lock. This source may provide the necessary combination, unique identification, and/or history of activity for the lock, in addition to other information. Additionally, the signal itself may be encrypted.
Locks of the type disclosed herein may not possess any specific opening information, such as the combination for that lock or that class of locks. Rather, such information may be provided elsewhere, for example in a lookup table associated with the tool used to open the lock or a remote authority in communication with the tool.
The tool may function as instructed by the revealed combination or by means of a unique identification linked to a higher authority, which provides the combination for the particular lock. The communication link, or the tool, may provide the necessary combination, authorizations, audit trail, and systems management as determined by the requirements of the application.
While incorporating the above features, the tools utilized as part of this invention may be of several levels of sophistication. In an initial level, a “dumb” tool may provide simple, specific and perhaps proprietary, mechanical actions to release latches or cause the lock to function. In general, a “dumb” tool requires the thought process of a person to operate the tool to unlatch a lock.
Typically, a “dumb” tool requires the operator to enter the lock's combination, manually into a computerized motor device within the tool to cause the tool to drive the lock through the appropriate combination or the “dumb” tool may be driven completely manually. In a manual mode of operation, a user may associate an external drive wheel with a mating element of the lock. The external drive wheel may include gear reduction technology to ensure that large and imprecise movements by the operator are reduced to very fine and accurate inputs into the lock. In the automatic operation mode, the tool may incorporate security features, such as having a different actual turning process than the process entered by a user, as will be discussed.
A “dumb” tool may also include proprietary interfaces with the lock, such as male/female mechanical interfaces. Typically, the interface will be hidden within the body of the lock cylinder and will be incorporated into the proximal end of the drive shaft. Such features include drive shaft ends with non-geometric constructions, or unique or rare geometries such as stars, torx, or the like. Preferably, the interface is proprietary.
“Dumb” tools may also incorporate additional security features such as electromagnetic pulse (EMP) protection, due to its pure mechanical make-up, or the use of exotic and high strength materials designed to withstand foreseeable attacks.
In addition, the tool may incorporate a time clock allowing for only time-certain use.
In a second level of sophistication, a “not so dumb” tool may be provided. In addition to meeting the description of a “dumb” tool, the “not so dumb” tool may incorporate means to identify the particular lock intended to be opened, without any input from the operator. The means of identifying the lock may be a signal from the lock, such as electronic, electromagnetic, optical, or otherwise. As previously discussed, the signal may be obtained from an RFID, mote, CMB, optical bar code, magnetic strip or similar medium.
A “not so dumb” tool may also include added security features such as radio frequency (RF) tagging, optics, global positioning systems (GPS), cellular triangulation, or similar tracking means. Moreover, the tool may have a database incorporated within the tool to determine the combination of a lock based on the precise geographic position of the tool, the position obtained by GPS, RF tagging, cellular triangulation, or other means.
A “not so dumb tool” may also include a “lock out” mechanism to protect against unauthorized use. This “lock out” mechanism may be a simple mechanical key cylinder or an electro mechanical device that enables the tool to operate only after the satisfaction of requirements such as entry of specific personal identification numbers (pin), passwords, passcards, biometrics, human embedded identification devices, voice sampling, or other criteria.
In other aspects of the invention, the tool may not indicate that the required authorizations have been provided, and may be captured by the lock upon attempted use without user validation or may include features to make the tool inseparable from the lock.
In yet a higher level of sophistication, a “smart tool” may build on the description of the “not so dumb tool” by at least including provisions to communicate with a remote station to provide some or all of the functions identified with a “not so dumb tool.” The central station may then monitor use of the tool and/or locks in real time, and may provide immediate security functions not available in the “not so dumb” tool, as is discussed further below. In the “smart tool,” the audit trail may be captured at the remote station, rather than, or in addition to, a memory module within the tool itself.
The “smart tool” may include features which go beyond those comprehended by the “not so dumb tool.” One such feature is video authorization, as is discussed further below.
Whether “dumb,” “not so dumb,” or “smart,” the tool may interface to the lock drive shaft with a mating drive. The drive interface may be a standard element like hex, torx, or Phillips drives, or alternatively may comprise a unique pattern like McGard®, a traditional key blank (keyed in a particular manner), or other types of proprietary interfaces. The tool is preferably able to quickly rotate the drive shaft in small angular increments or steps precisely and repeatably in both clockwise and counterclockwise directions. The lock itself may include tighter clearances between the “side bar” or fence and the mechanisms on the tumbler wheels with which they operate, including gates, bumps, notches, holes, etc., as known in the art.
Each lock may include a unique identification number that can be read either manually and entered manually into the tool, as in a “dumb” tool, or read automatically by the tool via RF tagging, magnetic interfaces, optical scanning, motes, CMBs or the like, as in a “not so dumb” or “smart” tool. In the case of identification by the tool, such as bar codes or optical interfaces, the identification may be internal to the lock to prevent reading of the bar code data or optical interface by the tool operator. The tool may then communicate the information to the operator for his subsequent operation of the tool's motor driven lock opening mechanism. In a “not so dumb,” the tool may include an “in-tool” database that communicates with the identification, recognizes the unique identification, and provides the tool's drive mechanism with the required combination sequence to open the lock. In a “smart” tool, the database may be external to the tool, in a location with which the tool may communicate, such as a central operating station.
The “smart tool” may have provisions such that the tool may be enabled only after the operator has been identified and qualified by the security system. This identification and qualification procedure may be conducted through a pin number, a password, a passkey, biometrics, human embedded identification devices or other devices. Videos images may also be utilized. Once enabled, the “smart tool” may obtain the unique identification number of the lock and request the code sequence (combination) required to open the lock from the remote database. The link from the tool to the remote database may use existing wired or wireless technology such as cellular, radio, satellite, wired landlines, or other means (the wired lines preferably including provisions within the tool for connection with standard telephone lines, cable lines, local area network lines, or the like for remote communication). At the remote database a complete audit trail could be maintained including location by GPS, cellular triangulation, RF tagging, manual input based on video capture, or the like. Discovery of theft or fraudulent use could result in a disabling lockout of the tool, capture of the tool, or another response as appropriate. All communications between the tool and the remote database may be encrypted for security purposes.
In other aspects of the invention, the lock itself may be hard-wired to a communication system for communicating with the remote station. A lock contained in a door of a typical office may include provisions for communicating operation times to a remote database via telephone line hard-wired directly into the lock. Operation events of the lock may then be monitored.
Combination lock mechanisms of the present invention may also incorporate an internal blocking element such as a miniature solenoid that is activated by the tool. In preferred embodiments, the combination lock mechanism is preferably in a blocked state at default, such that at least one of the internal disks cannot rotate. The tool may include a communication capability such that the tool and the lock, also provided with a communication capability, may go through an electronic “hand shake.” Once the lock recognizes the tool as being proper, the solenoid may be energized and moved to allow full rotation of the lock. Power for this energizing may come from a battery within the lock, a hard-wired electrical circuit within the lock, or from the tool itself.
Embodiments of locks suited for the present invention may include locks applied to doors of all sorts, security cabinets and containers, trucking/railway containers, safes or vaults, and similar fixed structures. The same teachings may also be applied to portable locking devices (padlocks) of various configurations such as U-shackle style, straight shackle style, hidden shackle style, or any other portable locking devices. These various embodiments may be used wherever the popular key function or externally manipulated combination mechanisms have been the lock of choice, such as in perimeter securement, vending machines, trucking/railway/intermodal containers, luggage, lockers, etc. In addition, the inventive locks have inherent advantages that facilitate use in hostile environments, or in situations of infrequent use. For example, the lock mechanism itself is preferably not exposed to the elements as are externally exposed keyed cylinders. In addition, o-rings or other protective barriers may be employed to limit debris from entering the lock mechanism.
In accordance with other aspects of the invention, “dumb locks” may include purely passive locks with no means of communication with a tool or no means for independent power. Such “dumb locks” may, conversely, include means to communicate with the operator of a tool, such as a branded serial number or other identification number. These “dumb locks” may therefore be used with “dumb tools.” A “smart lock” may include provisions to communicate with a tool, such that the tool may identify the lock, for example in the case of a “smart tool” or “not so smart tool.” The “smart lock” may also include means to store data within the lock, as is discussed below.
The subject matter regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the concluding portion of the specification. The invention, however, both as to organization and method of operation, together with features, objects, and advantages thereof will be or become apparent to one with skill in the art upon reference to the following detailed description when read with the accompanying drawings. It is intended that any additional organizations, methods of operation, features, objects or advantages ascertained by one skilled in the art be included within this description, be within the scope of the present invention, and be protected by the accompanying claims.
In regard to the drawings,
a is a logic diagram of a tool in accordance with certain aspects of the present invention; and,
b is a logic diagram of a tool in accordance with further aspects of the present invention.
In describing the preferred embodiments of the subject matter illustrated and to be described with respect to the drawings, specific terminology will be resorted to for the sake of clarity. However, the invention is not intended to be limited to the specific terms so selected and it is to be understood that each specific term includes all technical equivalents which operate in a similar manner to accomplish a similar purpose.
Aspects of the present invention provide means to manipulate the internal tumbler wheels or disks of a combination lock in accordance with the appropriate combination, which may be known or unknown to the operator, by means of a motor driven tool. In this regard, aspects of the present invention include the provision of novel manipulation means of the internal disks, preferably by means of a motor driven tool. The combination necessary to drive the tool in the directions and positions appropriate for the disks of a given lock may be provided by means of a signal; electronic, electromagnetic, optical, or otherwise, from a preferably secure identification source. The signal may be obtained from a radio frequency reference device (RFID), a “mote” (a new class of interactive microelectronic devices also commonly referred to as smart dust or wireless sensing networks), a contact memory button (CMB) (a non-powered read/write memory device capable of transferring data by contact), an optical bar code, a magnetic strip, or similar medium. In other embodiments, the lock may be provided with an alphanumeric designator corresponding to the lock's opening sequence. The tool may be provided with an optional character recognition system which may then read the alphanumeric characters to associate the tool with the lock. This source may provide the necessary combination, unique identification, and/or history of activity for the lock, in addition to other information. Additionally, the signal itself may be encrypted.
One feature of locks of the type disclosed herein is that the locks may not possess any specific opening information, such as the combination for that lock or that class of locks. Rather, such information may be provided elsewhere, for example in a lookup table associated with the tool used to open the lock or a remote authority in communication with the tool. As such, even if the lock is disassembled and analyzed, it would only potentially reveal the disk configuration for that particular lock, and not others of the same type. In addition, such acts would be destructive and would leave evidence of tampering.
The tool may function as instructed by the revealed combination or by means of a unique identification linked to a higher authority, which provides the combination for the particular lock. The communication link, or the tool, may provide the necessary combination, authorizations, audit trail, and systems management as determined by the requirements of the application.
While incorporating the above features, the tools utilized as part of this invention may be of several levels of sophistication. In an initial level, a “dumb” tool may provide simple, specific and perhaps proprietary, mechanical actions to release latches or cause the lock to function. In general, a “dumb” tool requires the thought process of a person to operate the tool to unlatch a lock.
Typically, a “dumb” tool requires the operator to enter the lock's combination, manually into a computerized motor device within the tool to cause the tool to drive the lock through the appropriate combination or the “dumb” tool may be driven completely manually. In regard to automatic operation, the operator may enter the required combination, such as the 10-22-17 example discussed above into a keypad associated with the tool. The tool may then manipulate the cylinder lock through the 10-22-17 sequence to open the lock. Preferably, there are no external markings on the lock housing to identify the numerical rotation stopping points. Rather, the tool itself incorporates means for calibration.
In the manual mode of operation, a user may associate an external drive wheel with a mating element of the lock. The external drive wheel may include gear reduction technology to ensure that large and imprecise movements by the operator are reduced to very fine and accurate inputs into the lock. Such devices are known in the industry. In the automatic operation mode, the tool may incorporate security features, such as having a different actual turning process then the process entered by a user. For example, a user may enter a certain combination into the tool, such as the 10-17-22 combination, but the tool may use that combination in accordance with a look-up table to determine the actual combination that will open the particular lock, which is preferably a combination completely different from the initial combination entered by the user. In a preferred embodiment, a user enters a lock identification number rather than a combination into the tool. The tool then looks up the lock's combination in accordance with a programmed look-up chart, internal to the tool and completely unknown to the user.
A “dumb” tool may also include proprietary interfaces with the lock, such as male/female mechanical interfaces. Typically, the interface will be hidden within the body of the lock cylinder and will be incorporated into the proximal end of the drive shaft. Such features include drive shaft ends with non-geometric constructions, or unique or rare geometries such as stars, torx, or the like. Preferably, the interface is proprietary.
“Dumb” tools may also incorporate additional security features such as electromagnetic pulse (EMP) protection, due to its pure mechanical make-up, or the use of exotic and high strength materials designed to withstand foreseeable attacks.
In addition, the tool may incorporate a time clock allowing for only time-certain use. For example, a particular tool may only be operable at certain times. Such a tool may be programmed to operate only during a person's shift, for example between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Alternatively, a tool may operate for a particular time period following entry of an access code or other authorization provision. This time period may be programmed to any length, such as 15 minutes or one day. The time clock may not be a conventional clock with hours and minutes displayed, but may be a simple countdown timer activated by the entry of an access code or other authorization.
In a second level of sophistication, a “not so dumb” tool may be provided. In addition to meeting the description of a “dumb” tool above, the “not so dumb” tool may incorporate means to identify the particular lock intended to be opened, without any input from the operator. In essence, therefore, the operator merely mates the tool with the lock and the tool determines the correct combination to open the lock based on identifying characteristics read or otherwise obtained from the lock itself. The means of identifying the lock may be a signal from the lock, such as electronic, electromagnetic, optical, or otherwise. As previously discussed, the signal may be obtained from an RFID, mote, CMB, optical bar code, magnetic strip or similar medium.
A “not so dumb” tool may also include added security features such as radio frequency (RF) tagging, optics, global positioning systems (GPS), cellular triangulation, or similar tracking means. For example, if the tool were moved outside of a designated area, the tool may be automatically disabled and/or flagged for later identification of the activity by system management.
Moreover, the tool may have a database incorporated within the tool to determine the combination of a lock based on the precise geographic position of the tool, the position obtained by GPS, RF tagging, cellular triangulation, or other means. For example, a particular user may have five locks located at different locations. The tool may have features built in, such as through GPS, cellular triangulation, RFID, or the like, by which the tool “knows” its precise geographic location. If the tool is activated at any one of the five locations, a look-up table within the tool may identify the correct combination for that particular lock, and may thus proceed to open the lock based on such data.
A “not so dumb tool” may also include a “lock out” mechanism to protect against unauthorized use. This “lock out” mechanism may be a simple mechanical key cylinder or an electro mechanical device that enables the tool to operate only after the satisfaction of requirements such as entry of specific personal identification numbers (pin), passwords, passcards, biometrics, human embedded identification devices, voice sampling, or other criteria. In this regard, the operator may be required to provide such validation means for the tool to operate. The tool may then operate indefinitely, or for a predetermined period of time. Other means of validation or authorization may be provided, such as proximity means. In this regard, a container may include a specific identifying feature with the container itself, such as an RF tag. The tool may be able to read this tag and identify the container. A lock external to the container may then have an opening sequence known by the tool in accordance with a look-up chart, preferably one capable of being modified depending on which particular lock is placed on which container. The tool may then open the lock. In essence, this embodiment of the invention is similar to one in which the tool identifies the lock, but replaces that identification for an identification of the container itself, not the lock. In this regard, one container may be provided from time to time with different locks, thus bolstering the security of the container.
In other aspects of the invention, the tool may not indicate that the required authorizations have been provided, and may be captured by the lock upon attempted use without user validation or may include features to make the tool inseparable from the lock.
In yet a higher level of sophistication, a “smart tool” may build on the description of the “not so dumb tool” by at least including provisions to communicate with a remote station to provide some or all of the functions identified with a “not so dumb tool.” In this regard, the central station may then monitor use of the tool and/or locks in real time, and may provide immediate security functions not available in the “not so dumb” tool, such as immediate shutdown of all tool functioning upon a breach of security. In the “smart tool,” the audit trail may be captured at the remote station, rather than, or in addition to, a memory module within the tool itself.
Because of the unique capabilities permitted by use of a remote station, the “smart tool” may include features which go beyond those comprehended by the “not so dumb tool.” One such feature is video authorization. Video authorization may produce an image of the individual attempting to use the tool, the video image being produced at a remote station. A supervisor at the station may authorize the tool's use upon confirmation of the individual's security clearance based at least partially on the video observation. This video observation may also be utilized to ensure that the operator is not acting under threat or duress. Of course, audio or other means of validation may be layered with the video. Once validated, the tool may receive an authorization signal to allow its use to unlock the passive lock.
Whether “dumb,” “not so dumb,” or “smart,” the tool may interface to the lock drive shaft with a mating drive. The drive interface may be a standard element like hex, torx, or Phillips drives, or alternatively may comprise a unique pattern like McGard®, a traditional key blank (keyed in a particular manner), or other types of proprietary interfaces (McGard® is a registered trademark of McGard Inc., 848 Kensington Avenue, Buffalo, N.Y. 14215). The tool is preferably able to quickly rotate the drive shaft in small angular increments or steps precisely and repeatably in both clockwise and counterclockwise directions. These features provide greatly enhanced performance from the traditional multiple tumbler wheel combination mechanisms requiring manual manipulation of external drive elements. These features also include significant improvement in the potential security provided. For example, because the tool's motor function is computer driven, and may incorporate more precise movement than capable by a human in a manual lock, the lock itself may include tighter clearances between the “side bar” or fence and the mechanisms on the tumbler wheels with which they operate, including gates, bumps, notches, holes, etc., as known in the art. Thus, the security against attempted opening via guessed codes (combinations) by humans is increased as is that against surreptitious attack. Because there is no need to facilitate direct human operation, it is envisioned that a lock mechanism cylinder of the present invention may be reduced to well below ¾″ diameter or smaller, using presently available materials and known technologies. Locks may also be larger than ¾″ diameter if so desired.
Each lock may include a unique identification number that can be read either manually and entered manually into the tool, as in a “dumb” tool, or read automatically by the tool via RF tagging, magnetic interfaces, optical scanning, motes, CMBs or the like, as in a “not so dumb” or “smart” tool. In the case of identification by the tool, such as bar codes or optical interfaces, the identification may be internal to the lock to prevent reading of the bar code data or optical interface by the tool operator. The tool may then communicate the information to the operator for his subsequent operation of the tool's motor driven lock opening mechanism. In a “not so dumb,” the tool may include an “in-tool” database that communicates with the identification, recognizes the unique identification, and provides the tool's drive mechanism with the required combination sequence to open the lock. In a “smart” tool, the database may be external to the tool, in a location with which the tool may communicate, such as a central operating station.
The “smart tool” may have provisions such that the tool may be enabled only after the operator has been identified and qualified by the security system. This identification and qualification procedure may be conducted through a pin number, a password, a passkey, biometrics, human embedded identification devices or other devices. Videos images may also be utilized. Once enabled, the “smart tool” may obtain the unique identification number of the lock and request the code sequence (combination) required to open the lock from the remote database. The link from the tool to the remote database may use existing wired or wireless technology such as cellular, radio, satellite, wired landlines, or other means (the wired lines preferably including provisions within the tool for connection with standard telephone lines, cable lines, local area network lines, or the like for remote communication). At the remote database a complete audit trail could be maintained including location by GPS, cellular triangulation, RF tagging, manual input based on video capture, or the like. Discovery of theft or fraudulent use could result in a disabling lockout of the tool, capture of the tool, or another response as appropriate. All communications between the tool and the remote database may be encrypted for security purposes.
In other aspects of the invention, the lock itself may be hard-wired to a communication system for communicating with the remote station. For example, a lock contained in a door of a typical office may include provisions for communicating operation times to a remote database via telephone line hard-wired directly into the lock. Operation events of the lock may then be monitored.
Combination lock mechanisms of the present invention may also incorporate an internal blocking element such as a miniature solenoid that is activated by the tool. In preferred embodiments, the combination lock mechanism is preferably in a blocked state at default, such that at least one of the internal disks cannot rotate. The tool may therefore include a communication capability such that the tool and the lock, also provided with a communication capability, may go through an electronic “hand shake”. Once the lock recognizes the tool as being proper, the solenoid may be energized and moved to allow full rotation of the lock. Power for this energizing may come from a battery within the lock, a hard-wired electrical circuit within the lock, or from the tool itself.
This technology, where a lock may go through a “hand shake” routine with a tool, is similar to technology incorporated into existing locks, such as those incorporated in Mul-T-Lock®'s Interactive® CLIQ® lock, Abloyls® SmartDisc lock, Medecols® NEXGEN® locks, and Videxis® CiberLock lock. Mul-T-Lock® and Interactive® are registered trademarks of Mul-T-Lock Limited Corp. Israel, Mul-T-Lock Park, Haazmant Boulevard, Yavine, Israel. CLIQ® is a registered trademark of ASSA ABLOY AB Corporation Sweden, P.O. Box 70340 S-10723, Stockholm, Sweden. ABLOY® is a registered trademark of ABLOY SECURITY LTD OY Corporation, Finland, Rajasampaaranta 2, SF-00560, Helsinki, Finland. Medeco® and NEXGEN® are registered trademarks of Medeco Security Locks, Inc. Corporation Virginia, P.O. Box 3075, Salem, Va. 24153. Videx® is a registered trademark of Videx, Inc. Corporation Oregon, 1105 N.E. Circle Blvd., Corvallis, Oreg. 97330-4285.
These products generally incorporate a processor and a blocking element in the lock cylinder that can be unlocked only after a successful digital handshake with a tool or key.
It will therefore be appreciated that in accordance with certain aspects of the invention, well-known, reliable, cost effective multiple disk combination locking mechanism may be utilized to provide a secure lock for various applications. This basic mechanism has been in common use for more than one hundred years, relying on manual manipulation of an external dial interface. This known concept requires the operator to know the appropriate sequence of manipulations or combination to cause the lock to open. However, the general concept has several major flaws that reveal themselves as the level of desired security increases.
One such flaw is a security flaw, which is the dependence on the maintenance of the secrecy of the combination. It will be appreciated that in a conventional lock, once an individual is aware of the combination, that individual may compromise the security of the lock, either intentionally or unintentionally, by permitting others to become aware of the combination. Another flaw is any one operational flaw, namely, the requirement that the operator know the secret combination. Obviously, if the operator does not know the combination, the operator may not be able to unlock the lock. Other important flaws involve the requirements for reasonable environmental operating conditions, such as sufficient lighting and time to perform the required functions. The operator's dexterity and mental capacity may also come into play, as conventional locks may be difficult to open for those with impaired physical abilities or limited mental capacity.
In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the combination mechanism is simple, the interface with the tool is simple, the encrypted identity of the lock is readily available to the tool, and the tool provides the appropriate manipulation instructions to the motor driven interface which causes the disks to be arranged in the unlocked position to open the lock. The operator may not, and preferably should not, know the lock combination. In this preferred embodiment, the only function of the operator is to provide the means to authorize the tool's functioning (if incorporated) and to align and hold the tool in proper relationship with the lock for the functioning to occur.
Embodiments of locks suited for the present invention may include locks applied to doors of all sorts, security cabinets and containers, trucking/railway containers, safes or vaults, and similar fixed structures. The same teachings may also be applied to portable locking devices (padlocks) of various configurations such as U-shackle style, straight shackle style, hidden shackle style, or any other portable locking devices. These various embodiments may be used wherever the popular key function or externally manipulated combination mechanisms have been the lock of choice, such as in perimeter securement, vending machines, trucking/railway/intermodal containers, luggage, lockers, etc. In addition, the inventive locks have inherent advantages that facilitate use in hostile environments, or in situations of infrequent use. For example, the lock mechanism itself is preferably not exposed to the elements as are externally exposed keyed cylinders. In addition, o-rings or other protective barriers may be employed to limit debris from entering the lock mechanism.
In accordance with other aspects of the invention, “dumb locks” may include purely passive locks with no means of communication with a tool or no means for independent power. Such “dumb locks” may, conversely, include means to communicate with the operator of a tool, such as a branded serial number or other identification number. These “dumb locks” may therefore be used with “dumb tools.” A “smart lock” may include provisions to communicate with a tool, such that the tool may identify the lock, for example in the case of a “smart tool” or “not so smart tool.” The “smart lock” may also include means to store data within the lock, such as with CMBs. The CMBs may store data communicated from the tool, such as the identity of the operator operating the tool or the geographic location of the lock at the time of opening. The CMBs may also store data directly obtained from the lock itself, such as the time the lock was opened and closed or the identification of the tool with which it was opened.
In practice, the tool operated combination lock generally operates under the principles known in the combination lock art, with the additions of tighter clearances, greater numbers of disks, and other improvements that could not have been realized in a practical sense until the novel mating of the combination lock with the speed and precision of the motorized tool disclosed herein.
It is contemplated that the tool operated combination lock of the present invention may be compatible with existing and commonly used lock hardware, including changeable, removable core, and keyed cylinders, such as the locks produced by Medeco Security Locks, Inc, 3625 Alleghany Drive, Salem, Va. Such existing hardware is widely used in access control, transit, utility, vending, pay telephone, parking, alarm, safe and perimeter control applications. In order to be adaptable for use most effectively with existing hardware, the preferred tool operated combination lock is packaged within a standard ¾″ diameter cylinder package, such that existing ¾″ diameter cylinder locks may be replaced with the tool operated combination lock unit. Of course, it will be appreciated that the tool operated combination lock unit may be smaller or larger depending on the desired application. Whether larger or smaller, the tool operated combination lock is preferably a simple, low part count, low cost, robust, environmentally hardened, and highly pick resistant mechanism.
As shown in
As shown in
Located at the intersection of the flange 122 and the extension area 124 in an internal portion of the drive cylinder, is a front cap 128. The front cap 128 comprises a front cap gate 130 in which portions of the side bar 114 may fit when the combination lock 100 is assembled.
On the opposite side of the flange 122 from the front cap 128, an external side, is a front face 132. It will be appreciated that the front face 132 is the portion of the combination lock 100 which is visible to the user upon installation of the cylinder lock in the final device, such as the door or padlock. The front face 132 includes an aperture 134 through which the drive shaft 112 may be accessed when the combination lock 100 is assembled, as will be discussed.
The aperture 134 is preferably circular, but may also include geometric or non-geometric features that limit entry into the aperture to tools which are shaped properly or incorporate features corresponding to the apertures' features. For example, in
The lock may further comprise a communication mechanism 135, such as those discussed herein, to communicate with a tool.
As further shown in
The extreme proximal portion 152 of the drive shaft 112 includes an alignment notch 154. The proximal portion 152 of the drive shaft 112 with the alignment notch 154 is accessible through the aperture 134 of the drive cylinder 108 when the combination lock 100 is assembled. The alignment notch 154 therefore serves at least two purposes; namely, the alignment notch provides an engaging surface with which a tool may engage to open the combination lock 100 and also provides the tool with registration information so the tool may go through the required series of rotations with a calibrated reference point relative to tab 136.
A pair of drive assembly spacers in the form of a proximal drive assembly spacer 156 and a distal drive assembly spacer 158 are mounted on the drive shaft 112 on opposite sides of the drive disk 104. The drive assembly spacers 156, 158 are offset a certain distance from the drive disk 104 to ensure that the drive disk remains that same certain distance from the endcap 116 on its distal side and the first disk 106a on its proximate side, when the combination lock 100 is assembled. The spacers 156, 158 also provide mechanical isolation between discs to prevent inadvertent rotation of discs.
In its assembled form, the drive assembly 148 is secured within the extension area 124 of the drive cylinder 108. In this regard, it will be appreciated that portions of the drive disk 104 will be concealed by the ¾ round extension area 124 while other portions are left exposed by the open top area 126. The drive assembly 148 is followed within the extension area 124 of the drive cylinder 108 by the end cap 116 when the cylinder lock is assembled. End cap 1116 may be fixed to extension area 124 by adhesives, solder, brazing, welding, mechanical fasteners, or the like.
The end cap 116 includes a cylindrical portion 160 ending in a flange 162 at its distal end. The cylindrical portion 160 includes an aperture 163 within which the drive shaft 112, and particularly the overtorque control portion 150 between the distal end of the drive shaft and distal drive assembly spacer 158, may be placed when the combination lock 100 is assembled. The cylindrical portion 160 also includes a side bar gate 164 within which a leg 140 of the side bar 114 may lay, as will be discussed.
Extending distally from the flange portion 162 of the end cap 116 is at least one connecting post 166. Preferably, four such post are provided in equally spaced relation. The connecting posts 166 are adapted to connect the end cap 116 to an end plug (
As shown in
The threaded portion 172 of the end plug 168 extends distally from the head portion 170 and is preferably concentric therewith. The generally cylindrical threaded portion 172 includes a pair of opposed flat sections 176 separating threads 178, such that the end plug 168 has the general appearance of a bolt, a commonly used configuration for cam cylinders. Of course there are many other suitable configurations.
The combination of the threads 178 and flat sections 176 are adapted to be inserted into an aperture 180 provided in the latch 110 upon assembly of the combination lock 100. The latch aperture 180 is shaped such that it includes flat sections 182 corresponding to the flat sections 176 of the end plug 168. In this regard, once the threaded portions 178 of the end plug 168 are inserted through the aperture 180 of the latch 110, the latch will rotate together in corresponding rotation with rotation of the end plug 168. A nut 184 is provided to hold the latch 110 to the end plug 168, the nut being threaded onto the threads 178 provided on the threaded portion 172 of the end plug.
Also shown in
In a final blow-up of
It is well-known that as the number of disks increases, there are less practical areas of gates available on any single disk. This is due to “nulls” created by the overlapping positions of adjacent disks. As a practical example, when two disks are used, it is estimated that 46 gate positions may be available for use on either of the disks in a conventionally sized ¾″ diameter combination lock. Yet, if five disks are used, the number of available gate positions may be reduced to approximately 40 positions per disk. These figures may be further reduced depending on gate and side bar dimensions and clearances, or the dimensions of the fly and pusher. In locks of the type described herein, the available gates per disk may further be reduced as a function of the tool's angular positioning resolution and tolerances.
The following table depicts the approximate number of combinations available for combination locks with various numbers of disks, as well as the time it would take for a malfeasant to cycle through all of the combination permutations, assuming each permutation could be cycled through in one second. This table assumes 7.5 degree increments for the gates (360/7.5=40) and that the fly and pusher occupy 15 degrees each. As is shown, the number of combinations, and thus the time it would take to cycle through the permutations, grows exponentially with the number of disks. The current practical limit of four disks theoretically allows for approximately four million permutations. A five disk cylinder lock, such as that created by Joseph L. Hall of Cincinnati, Ohio, in the mid-1800s, theoretically permits approximately 163 million combinations if constructed in accordance with today's state of the art designs and with today's state of the art materials. The five disk lock has proven to be too cumbersome for human use, and has never become accepted in commercial use. Notwithstanding, aspects of the present invention now make it practical to place combination locks with over five disks into the stream of commerce.
Referring again to
At the extreme proximal end of the disks shown in
Using disk 106a as an example, it will be appreciated that each disk 106a, 106b, 106c, 106d, 106e, includes a fly nib 196 and a pusher nib 198, with the fly nib on the distal side and the pusher nib on the proximal side. As will be discussed, upon rotation of the disks 106a, 106b, 106c, 106d, 106e, the pusher nib 198 of a first disk will engage the fly nib 196 of a second disk, on the proximal side of the first disk, to rotate the second disk. For example, upon rotation of disk 106a, pusher nib 198 will engage fly nib 196 of disk 106b to rotate disk 106b. This arrangement is commonly known in the art, where spacers 190a, 190b, 190c, 190d, 190e, also provide mechanical isolation between discs to ensure that adjacent discs only move when fly and pusher nibs are in contact.
In a completely assembled condition, the legs 138, 140 of the side bar 114 would be installed into the front cap gate 130 and the side bar gate 164 respectively, with the springs 144, 146 therebetween. The casing 102 would then be slid over the extension portion 124 of the drive cylinder 108 such that the side bar 114 is lodged within the notch 120 provided in the casing. Once so positioned, the cylinder retention clips 186 may be positioned within the cylinder retention clip slots 188 of the casing 102, such that they are lodged between the end plug 168 and the end cap 116 to retain the disk core within the casing. Finally the latch 110 may be placed over the threaded portion 172 of the end plug 168 and secured with the nut 184.
The operation of the cylinder lock of the present invention, such as the combination lock 100 shown in
The rotational pattern is typically clockwise, counterclockwise, clockwise, and so on. Because there are no external markings to indicate rotational degrees of the mating element and thus of the drive shaft 112, the tool must “know” how many of degrees of rotation through which it has traveled on each pass, and the correct combination for the lock. The tool may “know” this through various means, such as the means discussed above with respect to the “dumb,” “not so dumb,” and “smart” tools.
In any event, once the tool “knows” the correct combination, the engagement of the mating element with the drive shaft 112 permits the lock opening sequence to begin. Once begun, the mating element will rotate the drive shaft 112 through revolutions in a single direction at least equaling the number of disks in the lock to ensure that the disks are properly aligned in a beginning sequence. This rotation rotates the drive disk 104, for example in a clockwise direction. Each of the subsequent disks is “picked up” by the pusher nib of the preceding disk until the disks are aligned. Once the number of revolutions is reached, the drive disk 104 is then rotated in the counterclockwise direction one complete revolution such that the pusher nib 202 of the drive disk engages with the fly nib 196 of disk 106a. The rotation is then continued in the same direction until all of the pusher nibs 198 of the disks 106a, 106b, 106c are engaged with the fly nibs 196 of the adjacent disks. The rotation is ceased when the gate 118 of disk 106d is aligned directly below side bar 114, a location previously calibrated to a particular combination.
In this regard, it will be appreciated that the tolerance between the gate 118 and the side bar 114 of the present invention may be much tighter than those of conventional human operated cylinder locks because of the precise control exercised by the tool, which is vastly superior to average human dexterity. This serves several advantages. First, it permits a greater number of possible gates 118 per disk. It should be obvious that the greater number of gates 118 locations per disk, the greater number of possible combinations. Also, this enables the lock to be much more pick resistant, as the tighter tolerances make it much more difficult for a malfeasant to “feel” the gate as the disk is rotated in an attempt to pick the cylinder lock in the conventional manner known in the art.
Once the first disk 106e is properly aligned, the tool rotates the drive shaft 112 in the opposite direction such that the pusher nib 202 of the drive disk 104 engages the fly nib 196 of disk 106a in preparation for rotation of disk 106a in the opposite direction. The tool continues to rotate the drive shaft 112 until the rotations equal the number of disks minus one, such that disk 106d is not now “picked up” by the rotations. The proper number of rotations and more specifically, the proper degree of rotation will then leave the gate 118 of disk 106d aligned directly below the side bar 114. This procedure is then repeated until all of the gates 118 are aligned directly below the side bar 114.
Once the gates 118 are aligned, the entire drive cylinder 108 may be rotated within the casing 102. This causes the main portion 142 of the side bar 114 to drop down into the gates 118 and the legs 138, 140 of the side bar to drop into the front cap gate 130 and the end cap gate 164, respectively, as the notch 120 of the casing cams the side bar, compressing springs 144, 146. It will be appreciated that such rotation influences the end cap 116 and the end plug 168 to rotate, causing the latch 110 to similarly rotate opening the combination lock 100. If the gates 118 are not aligned, it is well-known in the art that the cylinder 108 may not rotate as the side bar 114 interferes with any attempted rotation.
As noted, the combination lock 100 opening sequence is similar to the opening sequences known in the art, but expands upon those by incorporating a greater number of revolutions owing to the use of greater numbers of disks. In addition, there are preferably no external indications of rotation degrees. Accordingly, the combination lock may not be operated without the precision of the tool.
In addition to the features of the combination lock 100 discussed above with respect to
As shown in
When the scrambler spring 204 is included, rotation of the drive shaft 112 will rotate portions of the scrambler spring such that the spring is energized. The standard tool utilized to achieve such rotation includes sufficient power to overcome the resistance of the spring 204. Once the lock has been opened, and the tool is removed, the now energized scrambler spring 204 serves to rotate the disks in a random pattern such that the disks are no longer aligned. This is done primarily as an added security feature, but also serves to reinforce the need for tool operation rather than human operation. If the lock includes a scrambler spring 204, human manipulation of the lock becomes more difficult as the spring may tend to turn the external dial (if so provided) through degrees of revolution not known by the user whenever the user loses a tight grasp of the external dial (if so provided). In lieu of a scrambling spring, the lock may be scrambled by the tool after the lock has been opened and before the tool is extracted. This scrambling algorithm may be programmed into the tool, and only needs to scramble one disk to ensure that the lock relocks. Of course the side bar would need to be in the recessed (unlocked) position before the algorithm is run. In this regard, the lock may incorporate a tool retention feature such that the tool may not be removed from the lock until the sidebar is returned to the recessed (unlocked) position.
Typically, the power supply 510 will be a standard power supply, such as 6, 12. or 18 volt DC. More or less powerful units may also be utilized if desired, or based on engineering and design criteria. AC power, either exclusively or in combination with the DC circuitry, may also be provided if so desired.
The motors 506 preferred for tools of this type are fine stepper motors, although other types of motors such as servo motors with position encoders may also be utilized. Stepper motors capable of the fine accuracy and range of motion required for this application are well known in the art. Such motors offer the ability to “stop on a dime,” and may rotate both clockwise and counterclockwise while retaining a extremely fine level of accuracy.
In the most basic form, the user interface 512 may be a simple on/off button or switch. For example, a “dumb” tool may operate to open locks having only one combination. The tool 500 may therefore rotate the cylinder lock interface 504 through a single combination at the instant the on/off button is activated. Thus, the motor controller 508 serves as the only memory and processing unit required.
The basic tool may incorporate components which are equivalent or which may be derived from those taught in U.S. Pat. No. 5,017,851 issued to Heinzman, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. These components may include the microprocessor 514, motor controller 508, memory 516, motor 506, and user interface 512, among other possible components such as power supply components.
In more sophisticated tools, such as “not so dumb tools,” the tool 500 may also include optional features such as more elaborate user interfaces 512, microprocessors 514, memory modules 516, and lock identification readers 518. The “not so dumb tool” may also incorporate location detection means 520, such as GPS, RFID, cellular technology, or the like. Finally, the “not so dumb tool” may also incorporate an internal clock 522, for recording the timing of particular events or other clock-related functions.
The functions of each of these elements have been previously discussed, and may be utilized in any combination to suit the purposes of the circumstance.
In the most sophisticated tools, such as “smart tools,” the tool 500 may also incorporate means for communicating to a remote station, such as a two way communication link 524, which may in turn be associated with a system administrator 526 and database 528.
Any of the aforementioned components may be split into separable components. For example, the power supply 510, motor 506 and motor controller 508 tend to be larger and bulkier than other components, particularly the memory 516, clock 522, and microprocessor 514. In addition, these components may be slower to evolve technically so may not require as frequent updating. As such, the power supply 510, motor 506 and motor controller 508 may be provided in a separate housing from the other elements.
By utilizing separable components, an authority utilizing the separable tool to open combination locks may enjoy a much greater range of procedures and potentially higher levels of security than with a tool incorporating each of the features in a single housing. Additionally, cost savings may be realized. For example, the first housing 602 may be used generically between several operators, each having their own second housing 604. This sharing not only leads to cost savings realized through shared use, but also may permit better accounting of the whereabouts of the first housing 602, as it may always be with an on-shift user. For example, in a typical three shift day, if each of the three users possessed a tool incorporating all of the features required to open the combination lock, then three tools could potentially be stolen or misused at any one time. If, however, a shared first housing was utilized, only one theft or misuse component would be at risk. If a thief or malfeasant were to steal or misuse only the second housing, they still could not unlock a combination lock of the present invention without the first housing. Of course, even if one were to steal both housing, or a single tool incorporating all of the required features to open a lock, additional layered security may be included, such as biometrics, passwords, pin numbers, and the like associated with the user interface. Other security measures such as time and location recognition and authorization for use may also be incorporated.
A registration element 710 may also be provided at the distal end 708 of the tool 700. The registration element may be a simple pin as shown, or may be more elaborate to further aid in the security of the device. The registration element 710 is adapted to mate with a corresponding element on the exterior portion of the combination lock (not shown), to align the tool in registration with the lock such that the required opening sequence may begin at a known reference point.
The distal end 708 of the tool 700 may also incorporate a sensor 712 adapted to identify the particular combination lock which is to be opened. As previously discussed, the sensor 712 may comprise an element adapted to read RF signals, optical signals, or magnetic signals, among others. The sensor 712 may also read barcodes, alphanumeric designators, or the like.
The tool may also incorporate a two way communication link 714 to link the tool's functioning to a remote authority. Such communication link 714 may comprise cellular, satellite, radio, IR, or other types of communication means.
The tool 700 may also incorporate a user interface 716, preferably at a proximal end 718 of the tool 700 for ease of use. The user interface 716, as previously discussed, may incorporate a key pad, LCD screen, card reader, biometric sensors, and the like, in order to securely control use of the tool 700.
In addition to the features shown and discussed with reference to tool 700, the tool may also comprise additional features not specifically discussed. Each of these features has been previously discussed with respect to
In addition to providing locks and tools separately, aspects of the present invention comprise systems of locks and tools engineered and constructed to work in tandem. Such locks and tools may comprise various combinations of elements previously discussed, all of which are entirely interchangeable depending on the nature of use to which the lock and tool will be put to.
The tool 800 may incorporate internal validation algorithms in its internal memory and process the algorithms through its processor, or the tool 800 may communicate with a remote station where the algorithms may be processed. In the most simplistic of locks, validation is based entirely on the input of user U. As such, if user U enters the correct validation information, the tool may be authorized for use. In other embodiments, validation may be based on input from the user U, as well as other factors, such as time of day, location of the tool, and identity of the combination lock.
In such case, the tool 800 may be mated with a combination lock 804 prior to validation. In this respect, the validation algorithm can determine if the particular user U is permitted to operate the lock in question 804. The mating of the tool 800 and the lock 804 permits a sensor (not shown) portion of the tool 800 to determine the characteristics of the lock in question 804, and to permit the tool itself to validate the information or to transmit the information to the remote authority RA. Such transmission may be through satellite communication S, as shown, or other communications means as previously discussed, for example landlines, cellular communications, IR communication, or the like. Once approval is received from the remote authority RA, the remote authority may store that information in a database DB. The remote authority may then communicate approval back to the tool through a satellite S or other means, and the tool may proceed with the angular positioning required to unlock the lock.
A logic diagram of a typical tool, such as tool 500 shown in
b builds on the disclosure of
As an example of the types of security components which may be built onto the tools of the present invention, shown in dotted lines on
Alternatively, rather than the location detection device 520 being in series between the user interface 512 and the microprocessor 514, the location detection device may communicate directly with the microprocessor 514, which may include an algorithm seeking a specific response from the location detection device.
In lieu of the location detection device, the tool 500 may include other components identified above. These other components may include biometric detection devices, for example. In such case, the user may have to satisfy a biometric criteria before the tool 500 may be enabled. Again, each of the components previously identified may be included interchangeably, cumulatively, or left absent, depending on the complexity and security levels desired for the particular application.
In still further levels of sophistication, a tool 500 may include additional features beyond those shown in
In still further embodiments, multiple look-up charts may be embedded into the logic of the microprocessor 514, for example the logic associated with a lock identification reader 518 and a location detection device 520. In this regard, the tool 500 may only operate to open a specific lock when the tool is in a specific location. Therefore, the tool 500 would identify the lock in question, then determine the locations in which the tool is authorized to open the lock. The microprocessor may obtain location information from the location detection device 520, to determine if the tool is in the proper location for that lock. Once the location detection criteria is met, the microprocessor 514 may proceed to look-up the combination for that particular lock, and transfer that information to the motor controller 508 to operate the tool.
These examples of the types and operation of tools contemplated are not intended to be limiting. Rather, they are exemplary of the features of particular tools and systems of tools and locks contemplated by the inventors herein. Various combinations of the features shown and described may be incorporated into tools and systems flowing directly from the disclosure herein, as the features may be used interchangeably.
Although the invention herein has been described with reference to particular embodiments, it is to be understood that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles and applications of the present invention. It is therefore to be understood that numerous modifications may be made to the illustrative embodiments and that other arrangements may be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/968,691 filed Oct. 19,2004. This application also claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/590,201 filed Jul. 22, 2004, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/621,031 filed Oct. 21, 2004, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14059 | Harrison, Jr. | Jan 1856 | A |
| 18169 | Yale | Sep 1857 | A |
| 25428 | Lyon | Sep 1859 | A |
| 44007 | Lorenz | Aug 1864 | A |
| 44757 | Thomson | Oct 1864 | A |
| 53096 | Ascherfeld | Mar 1866 | A |
| 61055 | Decker | Jan 1867 | A |
| 81203 | Pease | Aug 1868 | A |
| 81204 | Pease | Aug 1868 | A |
| 98917 | Brooks | Jan 1870 | A |
| 100402 | Hillebrand | Mar 1870 | A |
| 104038 | Kitson et al. | Jun 1870 | A |
| 109718 | Corbett et al. | Nov 1870 | A |
| 122082 | Van Tassel | Dec 1871 | A |
| 177814 | Delkescamp | May 1876 | A |
| 206528 | Bramble | Jul 1878 | A |
| 210844 | Ferret | Dec 1878 | A |
| 221595 | Mix | Nov 1879 | A |
| 229003 | Mason | Jun 1880 | A |
| 248835 | Adams | Nov 1881 | A |
| 256399 | Spielman | Apr 1882 | A |
| 274875 | Yoe | Mar 1883 | A |
| 280649 | Menzies | Jul 1883 | A |
| 297445 | Plumb | Apr 1884 | A |
| 374592 | Gilman | Dec 1887 | A |
| 417602 | Straubinger | Dec 1889 | A |
| 418884 | Bramble | Jan 1890 | A |
| 502307 | Lowrie | Aug 1893 | A |
| 512979 | Lowrie | Jan 1894 | A |
| 534653 | Lenhart et al. | Feb 1895 | A |
| 549951 | Belanger | Nov 1895 | A |
| 621391 | Turner | Mar 1899 | A |
| 628161 | Homman | Jul 1899 | A |
| 686882 | Ballou | Nov 1901 | A |
| 837295 | Fisher | Dec 1906 | A |
| 858264 | Daugherty | Jun 1907 | A |
| 880932 | Swoggers | Mar 1908 | A |
| 912773 | Augenbraun | Feb 1909 | A |
| 948853 | Gilroy | Feb 1910 | A |
| 972171 | Dupont | Oct 1910 | A |
| 1025538 | Roche | May 1912 | A |
| 1092474 | Carroll | Apr 1914 | A |
| 1222082 | Descalles | Apr 1917 | A |
| 1284655 | Greber | Nov 1918 | A |
| 1347467 | Scott et al. | Jul 1920 | A |
| 1363599 | Hull et al. | Dec 1920 | A |
| 1367647 | Washburn | Feb 1921 | A |
| 1384577 | Swan | Jul 1921 | A |
| 1401030 | Ashkar | Dec 1921 | A |
| 1424543 | Wiloch | Aug 1922 | A |
| 1426978 | Gambino | Aug 1922 | A |
| 1469233 | Messina et al. | Oct 1923 | A |
| 1520902 | Junkunc | Dec 1924 | A |
| 1527336 | Voda | Feb 1925 | A |
| 1618997 | Radandt | Mar 1927 | A |
| 1659433 | Kroll | Feb 1928 | A |
| 1665990 | Soley | Apr 1928 | A |
| 1689305 | Spano | Oct 1928 | A |
| 1712476 | Coiro | May 1929 | A |
| 1718723 | Williams | Jun 1929 | A |
| 1719309 | Radosevic | Jul 1929 | A |
| 1755521 | Smith | Apr 1930 | A |
| 1828747 | Perry | Oct 1931 | A |
| 1835317 | Miller | Dec 1931 | A |
| 1857399 | Piagneri | May 1932 | A |
| 1867689 | Van Leer | Jul 1932 | A |
| 1892964 | Rainey | Jan 1933 | A |
| 1902665 | Reinhold | Mar 1933 | A |
| 2001262 | North | May 1935 | A |
| 2079578 | Schlesinger et al. | May 1937 | A |
| 2116965 | Schoorel et al. | May 1938 | A |
| 2138003 | Hamilton | Nov 1938 | A |
| 2140490 | Wise | Dec 1938 | A |
| 2159291 | Quintal | May 1939 | A |
| 2163121 | Holtzman | Jun 1939 | A |
| 2163852 | Pond | Jun 1939 | A |
| 2179045 | Lewis | Nov 1939 | A |
| 2185899 | Nehls | Jan 1940 | A |
| 2248695 | Bradshaw | Jul 1941 | A |
| 2319753 | Smith et al. | May 1943 | A |
| 2362999 | Hewitt | Nov 1944 | A |
| 2479199 | Bennett et al. | Aug 1949 | A |
| 2488986 | Richter | Nov 1949 | A |
| 2497619 | Mass | Feb 1950 | A |
| 2508302 | Stue | May 1950 | A |
| 2544305 | Finke et al. | Mar 1951 | A |
| 2546182 | Fenari | Mar 1951 | A |
| 2623378 | Haver | Dec 1952 | A |
| 2655805 | Fletcher | Oct 1953 | A |
| 2666318 | Welch | Jan 1954 | A |
| 2686447 | Vock et al. | Aug 1954 | A |
| 2770998 | Schwartz | Nov 1956 | A |
| 2834195 | Stackhouse | May 1958 | A |
| 3241408 | McCauley | Mar 1966 | A |
| 3330586 | Becker | Jul 1967 | A |
| 3363500 | Simko | Jan 1968 | A |
| 3400626 | Bergere | Sep 1968 | A |
| 3412635 | Chmielewski | Nov 1968 | A |
| 3498173 | Wright | Mar 1970 | A |
| 3546906 | Yang | Dec 1970 | A |
| 3572063 | Foote | Mar 1971 | A |
| 3581530 | Raspadori | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3584667 | Reiland | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3592027 | Wako | Jul 1971 | A |
| 3702551 | Blizard | Nov 1972 | A |
| 3750431 | Atkinson | Aug 1973 | A |
| 3808984 | Teleky | May 1974 | A |
| 3823584 | Gill | Jul 1974 | A |
| 3837189 | Atkinson | Sep 1974 | A |
| 3841118 | Stone | Oct 1974 | A |
| 3874258 | Semola et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3952559 | Atkinson | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3973418 | Close | Aug 1976 | A |
| 3987653 | Lyon et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
| 4006660 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4015456 | Moberg | Apr 1977 | A |
| 4027572 | Burge | Jun 1977 | A |
| 4066195 | Dickler | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4070879 | Thompson | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4073165 | Grundstrom et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4100777 | Fredon | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4161896 | Creed | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4170918 | Burge | Oct 1979 | A |
| 4191228 | Fenton | Mar 1980 | A |
| RE30243 | Oliver | Apr 1980 | E |
| 4211128 | Plumer | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4216664 | Slavinsky | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4280726 | McCoag | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4325240 | Gable | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4332153 | Miles | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4351171 | Tsui | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4433563 | Wilson | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4483164 | Nielsen, Jr. et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4499745 | Ricouard et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4532785 | Uyeda | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4557122 | Hwang | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4557124 | Russ | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4655062 | Kaufman | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4671088 | Jeang | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4690443 | Brammall | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4730467 | Lebrecht | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4751830 | Cheng | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4770013 | Nakai | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4809569 | Erb | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4823566 | Patton | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4823567 | Patton | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4829795 | Taylor | May 1989 | A |
| 4838052 | Williams et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4841753 | Patton | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4862714 | Taylor et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4866958 | Bretl et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4884419 | Ling | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4885923 | Nakai | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4901057 | Suneborn | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4905490 | Wilson | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4918951 | Kavizky | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4952228 | Taylor et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 5017851 | Heinzman | May 1991 | A |
| 5020342 | Doan et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5033279 | Lebrecht | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5134869 | Gable | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5137407 | Yamamoto | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5140317 | Hyatt, Jr. et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5184491 | Schittenhelm | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5193367 | Ling | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5195342 | Werner | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5237842 | Rasch et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5245143 | James et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5279190 | Goss et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5347689 | Georgopoulos et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| D352886 | Taylor | Nov 1994 | S |
| 5361614 | Metcalf | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5367785 | Benarroch | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5378101 | Olson et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| D360125 | Taylor | Jul 1995 | S |
| 5440909 | Ely et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5485734 | Yang | Jan 1996 | A |
| D370618 | Taylor | Jun 1996 | S |
| 5542273 | Bednarz | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5582049 | Mauer | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5666831 | Doros | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5678436 | Alexander | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5694797 | Kuo | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5715709 | Lai | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5732989 | Stevenson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5737947 | Ling | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5749610 | Brammall et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5839302 | Chu | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5868012 | Chun-Te et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5870914 | Dawson | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5878604 | Stone et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5931030 | Chen | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5987939 | Pitisettakarn | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6047575 | Larson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6147622 | Fonea | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6173592 | Yu | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6227016 | Yu | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6233984 | Blehi, III | May 2001 | B1 |
| D450232 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2001 | S |
| 6378344 | Gartner | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6386006 | DeWalch | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6389854 | Huang | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6408660 | Lai | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6453706 | Chen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6464269 | Wilhelm et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6494070 | Moss et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6508086 | Chen | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6508089 | Tsai | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6513356 | Yang | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6513357 | McCurry | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6516643 | Olshausen | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6539761 | Yang | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6546763 | Pielach | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6546764 | Segawa | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6584819 | Hung | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6598434 | Yang | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6604393 | Larsen et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6708534 | Ruan | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6722166 | Skjellerup | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6725692 | Weinraub | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6729166 | Lai | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6739796 | Del Nero et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6766673 | Gast et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6843080 | Yu | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6848283 | Lin | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6860125 | Yu | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 7021092 | Loughlin et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7193503 | Fisher | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 20010039818 | Jones et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020088256 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020129628 | Skalberg | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020139155 | Franzen | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030089147 | Yang | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20040083782 | Lantz | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040226323 | Ling et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050034492 | Yu | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050039500 | Yu | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050039501 | Yu | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050044900 | Yu | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050044901 | Yu | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050044902 | Yu | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050044903 | Ling et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050044909 | Lange | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050235705 | Ling et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050235706 | Ling et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20060016230 A1 | Jan 2006 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60621031 | Oct 2004 | US | |
| 60590201 | Jul 2004 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10968691 | Oct 2004 | US |
| Child | 11186698 | US |
