The invention relates to tools used in metal-forming and powder compaction applications and methods of forming such tools.
Various types of tools are used in metal-forming applications such as machining, metal cutting, powder compaction, metal engraving, pin stamping, component assembling, and the like. In particular, punches and dies represent types of metal forming tools used to pierce, perforate, and shape metallic and non-metallic workpieces. Cutting tools and inserts represent types of metal forming tools used in machining applications to shape metallic and non-metallic workpieces. Punches and dies are subjected to severe and repeated loading during their operational life. In particular, punches tend to fail during use from catastrophic breakage induced by the significant stresses at the working end of the tool or other mechanisms, such as wear. The demands on metal-forming tools will become more severe with the introduction of workpieces constructed from steels having higher strength to weight ratios, such as ultra-high strength steels (UHSS's), advanced high-strength steels (AHSS's), transformation induced plasticity (TRIP) steels, and martensitic (MART) steels.
Punches are commonly constructed from various grades of tool steel. Conventional tool steels contain metal carbides that develop from a reaction of carbon with alloying metals, such as chromium, vanadium, and tungsten, found in common steel formulations. The metal carbide particles are initially present in bulk tool steel as clumps or aggregates. The carbide morphology, i.e. particle size and distribution, impacts the tool steel's material and mechanical properties, such as fracture toughness, impact resistance and wear resistance. These material and mechanical properties determine the ability of the tool steel to withstand the service conditions encountered by punches and dies in metalworking operations and serve as a guide in material selection for a particular application.
During tool steel manufacture, tool steel ingots or billets are typically hot worked above recrystallization temperature by hot rolling or forging process. When the tool steel is hot worked, segregated metal carbides may align substantially in the direction of work to form what is commonly known as carbide banding. Hot working of tool steel may also align regions enriched in certain segregated alloy components substantially in the direction of work to form what is commonly known as elemental or alloy banding.
The tendency of segregated metal carbides and alloy components to align along the working direction of hot rolled tool steel (i.e., in the rolling direction) in parallel, linear bands is illustrated in the optical micrographs of
After hot rolling, the tool steel is fashioned into a blank that preserves the carbide and/or alloy banding. The directionality of the metal carbides in the carbide bands and the segregated alloy components in the alloy bands increases the probability of brittle fracture and wear along that direction. When tool steel blanks are machined to make tools, like punches and dies, the carbide and alloy bands tend to coincide with the primary loading direction along which fracture may occur during subsequent use.
What is needed, therefore, is a tool with a working region formed from steel that does not contain directional carbide and/or alloy bands.
In one embodiment, a tool is provided for use in a machine to shape a workpiece. The tool comprises an elongate steel member including a longitudinal axis, a shank configured to be coupled with the machine, and a tip spaced along the longitudinal axis from the shank. The tip includes a working surface adapted to contact the workpiece. The tip includes a first region proximate to the working surface in which the steel has a microstructure containing carbide and/or alloy bands that are not substantially aligned with the longitudinal axis.
In one embodiment, the tip of the elongate member includes a second region juxtaposed with one first region where the second region includes another plurality of carbide bands or another plurality of alloy bands that are substantially aligned with the longitudinal axis. In yet another embodiment, the carbide bands or alloy bands in the first region have an interband spacing that is less than a second interband spacing of the carbide bands or alloy bands in the second region. The carbide or alloy bands are more tightly compressed in the first region compared to the second. In another embodiment, a method is provided that comprises fabricating a steel preform having a shank and a tip arranged along a longitudinal axis. The tip of the preform is thermo-mechanically processed to define a region containing a microstructure with carbide and/or alloy bands that are not substantially aligned with the longitudinal axis of the tip. The method further comprises finishing the preform into a tool with the region of the tip defining a working surface of the tool.
The steel in the elongate member or preform may comprise a tool steel commonly used to form tools for machining, metal cutting, powder compaction, metal engraving, pin stamping, and metal-forming applications. In various embodiments, the tool steel may have a carbide content ranging from about 5 percent to about 40 percent by weight.
The steel of the preform is mechanically processed at an elevated temperature by a thermo-mechanical treatment or process, such as conventional forging processes. Suitable conventional forging processes include, but are not limited to, ring rolling, swaging, rotary forging, radial forging, hot and warm upsetting, and combinations of these forging processes. Thermo-mechanical treatment generally involves the simultaneous application of heat and a deformation process to an alloy, in order to change its shape and refine the microstructure. The thermo-mechanical process economically improves the resultant mechanical properties, such as impact resistance, fracture toughness, and wear resistance, of the steel. The modified mechanical properties are achieved without altering the metallurgical composition of the steel.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with a general description of the invention given above and the detailed description of the embodiments given below, serve to explain the principles of the embodiments of the invention.
FIB. 5C is a perspective view of one embodiment of a tool, following thermo-mechanically processing of a preform with subsequent machining.
With reference to
When viewed along a longitudinal axis or centerline 22 of the tool 10, the shank 14 and body 16 of the elongate member have a suitable cross-sectional profile, such as, for example, a round, rectangular, square or oval cross-sectional profile. The shank 14 and body 16 may have cross-sectional profiles of identical areas or the body 16 may have a smaller cross-sectional area to provide a relief region between the shank 14 and body 16. In certain embodiments, the shank 14 and body 16 are symmetrically disposed about the centerline 22 and, in particular, may have a circular or round cross-sectional profile centered on and/or symmetrical about the centerline 22.
The head 12 of the tool 10 has a construction appropriate for being retained with a tool holding device used with a metalworking machine like a machine tool or a press (not shown). In the exemplary embodiment, the head 12 is a flange having a diameter greater than the diameter of the shank 14. Instead of head 12, the tool 10 may alternatively include a ball-lock retainer, a wedge-lock retainer, a turret, or another type of retaining structure for coupling the shank 14 of tool 10 with a tool-retaining device.
The tool 10, which has the construction of a punch in the representative embodiment, typically forms a component of a die set for use in a stamping operation. The die set further includes a die 26 containing an opening that receives a portion of the tip 15 of tool 10. The die 26 and tool 10 cooperate, when pressed together, to form a shaped hole in a workpiece or to deform the workpiece 25 in some desired manner. The tool 10 and the die 26 are removable from the metalworking machine with the tool 10 being temporarily attached by using a tool retention mechanism to the end of a ram. The tool 10 moves generally in a direction towards the workpiece 25 and with a load normal to the point of contact between the working surface 18 and the workpiece 25. The metalworking machine may be driven mechanically, hydraulically, pneumatically, or electrically to apply a load that forces the tool 10 into the workpiece 25. The tip 15 of tool 10 is forced under the high load imparted by the metalworking machine through, or into, the thicknesses of the workpiece 25 and into the die opening. The workpiece 25 is cut and/or deformed at, and about, the contact zone between the working surface 18 of tool 10 and the workpiece 25.
In an alternative embodiment of the invention, regions of the die 26 beneath one or more working surfaces of the die 26 may be formed from steel that has been thermo-mechanically processed in a manner consistent with the embodiments of the invention. Alternatively, for powder compaction applications, the workpiece 25 may comprise a powder housed in a recess of the die 26, instead of the representative sheet metal.
The tool 10 can be fabricated from various different classifications of steel including, but not limited to, tool steels like cold-work, hot-work, or high-speed tool steel grade materials, as well as stainless steels, specialty steels, and proprietary tool steel grades. The tool 10 may also comprise a powder metallurgical steel grade or, in particular, a powder metallurgical tool steel. Tool steel material grades are generally iron-carbon alloy systems with vanadium, tungsten, chromium and molybdenum that exhibit hardening and tempering behavior. The carbon content may be within a range from about 0.35 wt. % to about 1.50 wt. %, with other carbon contents contemplated depending on the carbide particles desired for precipitation, if any. In an alternative embodiment, the carbon content is within a range from about 0.85 wt. % to about 1.30 wt. %. The tool steel may exhibit hardening with heat treatment and may be tempered to achieve desired mechanical properties. Table 1 shows the nominal composition in weight percent of exemplary tool steel grades that may be used to fabricate the tool 10, the balance being iron (Fe).
The tip 15 of body 16 near the working surface 18 is subjected to a thermo-mechanical process that alters the morphology or microstructure of the material of the tool 10 by heating at least the tip 15 and applying a force to the tip 15. In particular, the thermo-mechanical process modifies the constituent microstructure of the tip 15 in a region L, such that the service life of the tool 10 in machining and metal-forming applications is significantly prolonged, but does not modify the composition of the tool steel. In one embodiment, region L intersects the working surface 18 and, therefore, region L may be measured along the length of the tip 15 of body 16 relative to the working surface 18. In specific embodiments, the structurally modified region L may extend a distance of between 0.125 inches (0.3175 centimeters) and 0.25 inches (0.635 centimeters) along the tip 15 from the working surface 18. In other specific embodiments, the structurally modified region L may extend a distance greater than about 0.001 inches (about 0.00254 centimeters) along the tip 15 from the working surface 18.
The extended service life may arise from a change in the directionality of the carbide and/or alloy banding in region L. In particular, the thermo-mechanical process may operate to misalign the carbide and/or alloy bands in region L such that adjacent bands are no longer aligned parallel to each other and with the centerline 22, as schematically shown in
In an alternative embodiment, the inclination angle, α1, may exhibit various different slopes, which may exhibit smooth or irregular transitions as the slope varies among the different slopes within the thermo-mechanically modified region, L. Moreover, an inclination angle, α2, of at least another of the carbide and/or alloy bands 24 may transition from approximate alignment with the centerline 22 outside of the thermo-mechanically modified region, L, to significant misalignment or nonalignment with the centerline 22 inside region, L. In addition, the inclination angle, α2, may differ from the inclination angle, α1, such that one of the carbide and/or alloy bands 24 appears to approach another of the carbide and/or alloy bands 24 in a converging manner. Similarly, one carbide and/or alloy band 24 may appear to diverge from another carbide and/or alloy band 24. In one embodiment, the carbide and/or alloy bands 24 may transition from approximate alignment with the centerline outside of the thermo-mechanically modified region, L, to an orientation such that the carbide and/or alloy bands 24 are not unidirectionally aligned. In some instances, adjacent pairs of the carbide and/or alloy bands 24 may appear to converge at some depths within region L while appearing to diverge from each other at other depths within region L so that the interband spacing varies with position along the centerline 22 in region L. In another alternative embodiment, all of the carbide and/or alloy bands 24 may exhibit the same changes in inclination angle, α1, over the length of the thermo-mechanically modified region, L, so that the inter-band spacing is approximately constant.
This morphological modification producing the misaligned carbide and/or alloy bands locally in region, L, may operate to improve the mechanical properties of the tool 10. In particular, the resistance of the tool steel to brittle fracture is believed to be greatly improved by eliminating directionality in the carbide and/or alloy banding in the modified region, L. Regions of the body 16 and shank 14 outside of the modified region, L, may not be modified by the thermo-mechanical process and, therefore, these regions may exhibit the directionality of the carbide and/or alloy bands characteristic of hot worked tool steel, like hot rolled tool steel. The improvement in mechanical properties for tip 15 is independent of the tool retaining mechanism used in tool 10.
With reference to
The geometry or shape of the initial blank 30, before the application of the thermo-mechanical processing, will impact the resultant microstructure in region L of the tool 10, for example, like the tool 10 illustrated in
The blank 30 with a frustoconical tip 32 (for example, blank 30 illustrated in
Suitable thermo-mechanical treatments include, but are not limited to, forging processes such as radial forging, ring rolling, rotary forging, swaging, thixoforming, ausforming, and warm/hot upsetting. For upset forging, also referred to simply as upsetting, single or multiple upsetting may be used to shape the blank 30. After the conclusion of the thermo-mechanical treatment process, the blank 30 may be heat treated, finish machined, and ground to supply any required tooling geometry as found in conventional tools.
With reference to
With reference now to
With reference to
With reference now to
Next, the tip 72 is subjected to a second hot-upsetting thermo-mechanical process that deforms the tip 72 into a more cylindrical shape, as best shown in
After the thermo-mechanical process is used to alter the alignment of the carbide and/or alloy bands, a secondary process may be used to further modify the tip 15 (
Exemplary secondary processes include thermal spraying or cladding the working surface of the tool 10 with one or more wear resistant materials. Other secondary process may include applying a coating on the working surface of the tool 10 by a conventional coating techniques including, but not limited to, physical vapor deposition (PVD), chemical vapor deposition (CVD), or salt bath coatings. Other surface modification techniques may include ion implantation, laser or plasma surface hardening techniques, nitriding, or carburizing. These exemplary surface modification techniques may be used to modify a surface layer at the working surface of the tool. Additional secondary processes, such as edge honing, are contemplated by the invention for use in modifying the working surface of the tool 10. Furthermore, various different secondary processes may be used in any combination for further modifying tip 15.
The tool 10 may have other punch constructions that differ from the construction of the representative embodiments. As examples, tool 10 may be configured as a blade, a heel punch, a pedestal punch, a round punch, etc. Although tool 10 is depicted as having a construction consistent with a punch in the representative embodiment, a person having ordinary skill will understand that the tool 10 may have other constructions. In particular, tool 10 in the form of punch or stripper may be applied in metal stamping and forming operations like piercing and perforating, fine blanking, forming, and extrusions or coining.
The tool 10 may also have the construction of a cutting tool, such as a rotary broach, a non-rotary broach, a tap, a reamer, a drill, a milling cutter, etc. Tool 10 may be used in casting and molding applications, such as conventional die casting, high pressure die casting, and injection molding. Tool 10 may also be utilized in powder compaction applications used in pharmaceutical processes, nutraceutical processes, battery manufacture, cosmetics, confectionary and food and beverage industries, and in the manufacture of household products and nuclear fuels, tableting, explosives, ammunition, ceramics, and other products. Tool 10 may also be used in automation and part fixturing applications, such as locating or part-touching details.
In an embodiment of the invention, tool 10 may be made by machining a thermo-mechanically processed end of an existing tool to define a tip 15 arranged along the centerline 22 with the shank 14, such as the tip 74 depicted in
In another embodiment, tool 10 may be made by machining an end of an existing tool to define tip 15 arranged along the centerline 22 with the shank 14. The tip 15 contains carbide and/or alloy bands that are aligned with the rolling direction. The tip 15 is thermo-mechanically processed to modify an alignment of the carbide and/or alloy bands relative to the centerline 22 of the tip 15.
Further details and embodiments of the invention will be described in the following examples.
A conical blank or preform for a punch was prepared with a geometry as shown in
After thermo-mechanical processing, the tip was sectioned longitudinally approximately along the centerline using a diamond saw, ground, and polished using standard metallographic sample preparation techniques. The polished sample was etched using a 3% nital solution (i.e., 3 vol. % nitric acid and the rest methanol), rinsed and dried.
As readily apparent in
In another, similar example, a tool prepared in accordance with Example 1 was heat treated and triple tempered. Following this preparation, the tool was cut and one of the cut specimens was polished and then etched with a 3% nital solution. Optical micrographs at about 100×, as shown in
With reference now to
Additionally, from the measurements, it is also believed that there is a gradient in the interband spacing from a peripheral surface to a longitudinal axis of the tool. For example, in the exemplary embodiment illustrated in
A conical blank and process similar to that described in Example 1 was fabricated except that an additional hot upsetting thermo-mechanical process was performed.
With reference now to
Punches were formed from the preforms of Examples 1 and 2 with the working surface and underlying portion of the body formed from the thermo-mechanically modified M2 grade tool steel. The punches were used to pierce 0.5 inch diameter holes in workpieces comprising 0.125 inch thick re-rolled 125,000 psi yield strength rail steel. Two parameters, the number of cycles or parts/hits and the burr height (both generally accepted as standard indicators of tool life and wear in the metal-forming industry), were used as benchmark in this piercing application. During use, the punches were held using a ball-lock tool retention mechanism.
As shown in
As shown in FIGS. 12 and 13A-C, similar improvements in wear resistance and edge retention are also evident for the thermo-mechanically processed punches in comparison with the conventional punch. The thermo-mechanically processed M2-grade tool steel punches exhibited a slower rate of wear, as indicated by the smaller slope, and better edge retention than the conventional M2 tools as is graphically illustrated in
As is apparent from
These improvements in tool life and wear resistance result from realignment of the carbide and/or alloy bands in a direction other than the primary loading direction, which is aligned generally with the centerline or longitudinal axis of a punch, and potential minor contributions from secondary mechanisms. The re-alignment of carbide and/or alloy bands significantly reduces the probability of failure along the working edge, while improving tool life, edge retention, and wear resistance. Improvements in tool life and wear resistance may also result from an increase in density of the interband spacing in the processed section.
A conical blank or preform was prepared with a geometry as shown in
As shown in
These improvements in service life and wear resistance result from realignment of the carbide and/or alloy bands relative to the hot-rolled condition and potential minor contributions from secondary mechanisms. The re-alignment of the carbide and/or alloy bands significantly reduces the probability of failure along the working edges of the broach, while improving tool life, edge retention, and wear resistance. In a broach, the load is applied at an angle relative to the carbide and/or alloy bands so that the loading direction is not substantially aligned with the carbide and/or alloy bands. Other factors that may improve the service life and wear resistance of the tool include an increase in the density of the interband spacing in the processed section relative to the unprocessed section of the tool.
While the invention has been illustrated by a description of various embodiments and while these embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not the intention of the applicants to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. Thus, the invention in its broader aspects is therefore not limited to the specific details, representative apparatus and method, and illustrative example shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departing from the scope of applicants' general inventive concept.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/896,729, filed Mar. 23, 2007, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
229840 | Richards | Jul 1880 | A |
254195 | Brown | Feb 1882 | A |
295227 | Briggs et al. | Mar 1884 | A |
770238 | Lovejoy | Sep 1904 | A |
1366026 | Rydbeck | Jan 1921 | A |
1446879 | Coffey | Feb 1923 | A |
1533263 | Pritchard | Apr 1925 | A |
1542047 | Ferrari | Jun 1925 | A |
1554336 | Lapotterie | Sep 1925 | A |
1637111 | Honig | Jul 1927 | A |
1687825 | Brassert | Oct 1928 | A |
1952388 | Simons | Mar 1934 | A |
1977845 | Emmons | Oct 1934 | A |
2040957 | Sanders | May 1936 | A |
2638019 | Stellin | May 1953 | A |
2656739 | Mansfield | Oct 1953 | A |
2717846 | Harvey | Sep 1955 | A |
2622682 | Goetzel et al. | Jul 1956 | A |
2753261 | Goetzel et al. | Jul 1956 | A |
2755689 | Sundback | Jul 1956 | A |
2767837 | Nachtman et al. | Oct 1956 | A |
2767838 | Nachtman et al. | Oct 1956 | A |
2934463 | Schmatz et al. | Apr 1960 | A |
3010207 | Barnes | Nov 1961 | A |
3076361 | Epstein et al. | Feb 1963 | A |
3143026 | Akerson | Aug 1964 | A |
3238540 | Muenchinger | Mar 1966 | A |
3279049 | Ellis et al. | Oct 1966 | A |
3290936 | Harvey | Dec 1966 | A |
3340102 | Kulin et al. | Sep 1967 | A |
3396567 | Bachmann | Aug 1968 | A |
3413166 | Zackay et al. | Nov 1968 | A |
3425877 | Deacon et al. | Feb 1969 | A |
3535910 | Connolly | Oct 1970 | A |
3650163 | Juffs | Mar 1972 | A |
3737981 | Plockinger et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3752709 | Zackay et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3848453 | Hardt | Nov 1974 | A |
3877281 | Shimizu et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3889510 | Yamakoshi et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
3903761 | Runton | Sep 1975 | A |
3903784 | Dekker | Sep 1975 | A |
3923469 | Palynchuk | Dec 1975 | A |
3964938 | Tolliver et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3974728 | Herlan | Aug 1976 | A |
3983042 | Jain et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4015657 | Petrov et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4040872 | Mudiare | Aug 1977 | A |
4077812 | Tani | Mar 1978 | A |
4095449 | Roach et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4105443 | Dearnaley et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4170497 | Thomas et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4198884 | Nakagawa et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4222260 | McDermott | Sep 1980 | A |
4249945 | Haswell et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4259126 | Cole et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4270378 | Brown et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4318733 | Ray et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4368634 | Brown et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4526077 | DeGuvera | Jul 1985 | A |
4571983 | Sanborn et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4587095 | Yoshimura et al. | May 1986 | A |
4608851 | Khare | Sep 1986 | A |
4628178 | Miyake et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4644776 | Berchem | Feb 1987 | A |
4729872 | Kishida et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4748088 | Billgren | May 1988 | A |
4793231 | Brown | Dec 1988 | A |
4830930 | Taniguchi et al. | May 1989 | A |
4832764 | Merz | May 1989 | A |
4838062 | Prenn | Jun 1989 | A |
4878403 | Barr | Nov 1989 | A |
4996863 | Keeler | Mar 1991 | A |
5054308 | Asai et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5080727 | Aihara et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5094698 | Gallagher, Jr. | Mar 1992 | A |
5110379 | Finkl | May 1992 | A |
5136905 | Stack et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5345129 | Molnar | Sep 1994 | A |
5406825 | Horie et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5511450 | Nagao | Apr 1996 | A |
5577323 | Sawai et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5660648 | Takada et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5762725 | Pichard et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5820706 | Bellus et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5958158 | Kron et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5989731 | Arisawa et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6284366 | Konig et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6348112 | Hildreth et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6355119 | Peters et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364974 | Kobasko | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6419770 | Miyashita et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6454991 | Yoshimura et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6478900 | Isogawa et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6725756 | Brenneke | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6743311 | Nishigori et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6811899 | Inoue | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6838048 | Nishi et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6874234 | Bauman et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7093526 | Ando et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7150897 | Mikus | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7162907 | Joseph et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7169347 | Kuwabara et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7462853 | Funakoshi et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
20040200552 | Fukumoto et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050227772 | Kletecka et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060075871 | Lockhart et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060157163 | Shimizu et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060231167 | Hillstrom | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070179515 | Matsutani et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080308194 | Corquillet et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0587489 | Mar 1994 | EP |
1657315 | May 2006 | EP |
1985390 | Oct 2008 | EP |
848594 | Sep 1960 | GB |
56151125 | Nov 1981 | JP |
08300092 | Nov 1996 | JP |
11254077 | Sep 1999 | JP |
11256271 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2000015379 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2005314756 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2007160318 | Jun 2007 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Fountaintown Forging, Why should I buy metal forging? [online].[Retrieved on Jan. 10, 2014]. Retreived from the internet <URL:http://www.fountaintownforge.com/faq>. |
Porter Precision Products, http://www.porterpunch.com/home.html, printed Feb. 1, 2007 (2 pages). |
Ramanthan, et al., “Effect of prior microstructure on austenite decomposition and associated distortion” Aug. 2001, retrieved from http://www.forging.org/FIERF/pdf/Microstructure.pdf on Jun. 20, 2009. |
International Search Report issued in corresponding PCT Application serial No. PCT/US2009/33887 dated Jun. 30, 2009. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report issued in corresponding PCT Application serial No. PCT/US2008/057338 dated Jun. 25, 2008, 2 pages. |
Devor, et al., “Microstructure-Level Model for the Prediction of Tool Failure in WC-Co Cutting Tool Materials”, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Aug. 2006, vol. 128, Issue 3, Abstract, 1 page. |
Hughes, et al., “Scaling of Misorientation Angle Distributions”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 81, No. 21, Nov. 23, 1998. |
Wert, et al., “Revealing Deformation Microstructures”, materialstoday, Sep. 2007, vol. 10, No. 9. |
European Search Report issued in corresponding European Application serial No. 09002103.1 dated Jul. 6, 2009. |
EP 0587489—English translation. |
JP 56 151125—English translation. |
Dieter, George, “Mechanical Metallurgy”, Jun. 1986, Title, Copyright, Table of Contents, pp. 524-539, McGraw-Hill, New York, U.S. |
European Patent Office, International Search Report issued in corresponding European patent application No. 08251055.3 dated Sep. 26, 2008. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/370,906 dated Dec. 21, 2011. |
European Patent Office, European Search Report issued in corresponding European patent application No. 11 16 5001 dated Jul. 15, 2011. |
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action in JP2009-031600, mailed Jul. 23, 2013. |
Mexican Patent Office, Office Action in Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/20091001768, dated Sep. 5, 2013, including an English-language summary (5 pages). |
Dieter, George E., “Fundamentals of Metalworking,” Mechanical Metallurgy SI Metric Edition, Part 4, Chapter 15, p. 503, 1986 (5 pages). |
ASM International, “Powder Metallurgy High-Speed Tool Steels,” ASM Specialty Handbook, Tool Materials, 1995, p. 1 (4 pages). |
Taiwan Patent Office, Office Action in (ROC) Taiwan Patent Application No. 097110451 dated Nov. 7, 2013. |
Mexico Patent Office, Office Action in Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2009/001768, dated Oct. 28, 2014. |
USPTO, Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/370,906 dated Nov. 21, 2014. |
USPTO, final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/370,906 dated Jul. 18, 2012. |
USPTO, Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/370,906 dated May 22, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080229893 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60896729 | Mar 2007 | US |