This application is a National Stage entry under 35 U.S.C. §371 of PCT Application No. PCT/CH2007/000405 filed on 17 Aug. 2007 which claims the benefit of Swiss Application No. CH 1364/06 filed on 25 Aug. 2006, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention concerns brush heads for tooth brushes in which some of the tufts are slanted and some of the tufts are upright.
2. Background of the Invention
Tooth brushes with a mixed studding of tufts rising upright from the bristle carrier, on the one hand, and slanted x-wise crossing tufts, on the other hand, with all bristles being cylindrical, are known from EP-A-0 885 573. The applicant of the present application has been marketing in Europe three tooth brushes of this type, under the names Elmex Inter X, Elmex Inter X sensitive and Elmex Inter X junior. These tooth brushes are distinguished from a brush with exclusively vertically upright or exclusively x-wise crossing tufts by a good cleaning performance for both the tooth surfaces and the spaces between the teeth.
Recently, tooth brushes with so-called “pointed” bristles have also become known, say, from EP-A-0 596 633, wherein only pointed bristles are present in upright standing tufts. Pointed bristles are more flexible than traditional bristles and therefore allow for a more gentle cleaning of the tooth surfaces with less risk of injury.
The problem of the present invention was a further improvement of the brush heads for tooth brushes.
This problem is solved by a brush head for a tooth brush that has a handle part, a head part, and a bristle surface with tufts of bristles set therein, wherein at least one of these bristle tufts is vertical on the bristle surface and at least one of these tufts is slanted, characterized in that the slanted bristle tufts consist of cylindrical bristles and at least some of the upright tufts consist of pointed bristles.
Preferred embodiments will be found in the subclaims.
Surprisingly, it has been found that such brush heads enhance the mesial/distal cleaning performance on the tooth surfaces and at the same time a more gentle cleaning of the tooth surfaces is possible.
The brush heads of the invention, besides having at least one vertically upright tuft of pointed bristles, also have one or more slanted tufts.
The term “slanted” means in the context of the present application that a slanted tuft is tilted at an acute angle to an imaginary line running vertical to the brush surface, and this imaginary line passes through the midpoint of the hole in the bristle carrier belonging to that tuft. This acute angle can be around 1 to around 45°, preferably around 1° to around 10°, more preferably around 7 to around 9° and most preferably around 8°. Thus, a slanted tuft can be slanted forward, backward, or to one side by the aforesaid acute angle. In particular, in one embodiment of the invention, it can be preferable for those tufts situated at the edge of the bristle carrier to be standing up from the bristle carrier by the aforesaid acute angle and slanting outward, which enables a better cleaning of the gums.
Preferably, however, “slanted” means that the tuft in question is slanting forward or backward, or preferably that all slanted tufts are slanting either forward or backward. The term “slanting backward” means in the context of the present application that a backward slanting tuft is tilted toward the handle part by the acute angle, looking in the lengthwise direction of the bristle carrier, and the term “slanting forward” means in the context of the present application that a forward slanting tuft is tilted away from the handle part by the acute angle, looking in the lengthwise direction of the bristle carrier.
The brush head of the invention has a surface which can be planar or arched, and that has holes designed to receive the tufts. The tufts of bristles in the finished brush head protrude from this surface. This surface is known as the “bristle surface”.
The tufts projecting vertically from the bristle surface consist at least in part of pointed bristles. By “at least in part” in the context of the application is meant that preferably at least 50% and more preferably at least 80% of the bristle ends are pointed. Especially preferably, all bristles in the vertically upright tufts are pointed.
Preferably, the tufts of the invented brush head have a circular cross section; also preferably, they all have the same diameter of the circular cross sectional surface.
The term “pointed bristle” is the technical term for a bristle whose one end or whose both ends have been reduced in thickness by means of chemical etching (e.g., with sulfuric acid or with sodium hydroxide) or by means of mechanical sharpening so that the bristle is given a somewhat conical profile, tapering toward its end. If both ends of the bristle are so treated, one speaks of a “two-ended pointed bristle”, otherwise a “one-ended pointed bristle”. Details on the method of production of pointed bristles are described in various patent publications; for example, refer to EP-A-1 234 525, Korean patent No. 130932 and US-A-2004/0070258. For the present invention, suitable pointed bristles are also available on the market, say, from the manufacturers Sogo, Hylon, Best Whasung, Chcil Jedang, Lion and Wessen.
Preferably, the pointed ends of the bristles are tapering toward their pointed end, about a central axis of a solid of revolution with rotational symmetry to the bristle. In this case, the pointed bristles especially preferably have a profile (i.e., a diameter of the solid of revolution as a function of the distance from the pointed end) that corresponds roughly to the numerical values from one of the following tables 1 to 5. In these tables, the mean diameters of the bristles are shown as a function of the distance from the pointed end. The “diameter range” indicated in these tables is a typical standard deviation of the diameter determined from several bristle samples; this standard deviation can also be used as a feature characterizing the limits of the range of the diameter of these five profiles especially preferred according to the invention.
The nonpointed part of the pointed bristles, if these bristles have rotational symmetry, can have a diameter of around 0.12 to 0.25, preferably around 0.17 to 0.20 mm.
Preferably, the tufts of the brush head of the invention are arranged in transverse rows running across its lengthwise direction, while each transverse row has either only forward slanting tufts with cylindrical bristles, or only backward slanting tufts with cylindrical bristles, or only bristles projecting vertically from the bristle surface with pointed and/or cylindrical bristles, and at least one transverse row of forward or backward slanted tufts and at least one transverse row of tufts projecting vertically from the bristle surface is present.
The cylindrical bristles preferably have a diameter of around 0.12 to around 0.25, preferably around 0.17 to around 0.19 mm.
The brush heads according to the invention preferably contain a first and a second transverse row of vertically projecting tufts of pointed bristles, and these two rows are adjacent. The tufts of these two transverse rows are preferably arranged so that one tuft each of the first transverse row and one tuft of the second transverse row lie in pairs on an imaginary line, parallel to the lengthwise direction of the brush head, and these two tufts are spaced apart on this line at a distance d of around 0.65 to around 0.95 mm, preferably around 0.7 to around 0.9 mm and more preferably around 0.75 to around 0.85 mm. Preferably, the tufts of the first and second transverse row have a height ha of around 10.0 to around 13.0 mm, preferably around 11.3 to around 11.7 mm, and more preferably around 11.5 mm.
More preferably, the brush heads of the invention also contain one, or better two double rows of x-wise crossing tufts. One of these double rows is adjacent to the above-mentioned first transverse row and the second double row is adjacent to the above-mentioned second transverse row. Each of these double rows consists of one transverse row of forward slanting tufts and another transverse row of backward slanting tufts. The tufts of one of these transverse rows are staggered relative to the tufts of the other transverse row, so that one tuft of one of these transverse rows and one tuft of the other of these transverse rows cross in pairs x-wise. The distance dx between the two transverse rows forming a double row is preferably around 0.7 to around 1.3 mm, more preferably around 0.9 to around 1.1 mm and especially preferably around 1 mm.
The slanted tufts can have a height hs which is equal to or somewhat greater than the height ha of the tufts of the aforementioned first and second transverse row. The height hs is preferably around 10.5 to around 13.5 mm, preferably around 11.5 to around 12.5 mm; especially preferably it is around 11.5 mm or around 12.5 mm. The height of a slanted tuft is taken to be the midpoint of the brush surface of this tuft, measured perpendicular to the bristle surface, having preferably been made plane by trimming and standing perpendicular to the central axis of the tuft.
If one or two double rows of x-wise crossing tufts are present, the distance da between a double row of x-wise crossing tufts and the adjacent first (or second) transverse row of vertically projecting tufts is preferably around 2.5 to around 3.5 mm, more preferably around 2.7 to around 3.3 mm and especially preferably around 3.0 mm.
If precisely two double rows of x-wise crossing tufts are present, these are preferably separated from each other at a distance dxx in the lengthwise direction of around 8.5 to around 9.5 mm, more preferably around 8.7 to around 9.3 mm and especially preferably around 8.9 mm.
The brush head of the invention can preferably have additional transverse rows of vertically projecting tufts of cylindrical and/or pointed bristles, preferably only pointed bristles, looking in the lengthwise direction toward the head part and looking in the lengthwise direction toward the handle part. If the brush head of the invention has two double rows of x-wise crossing tufts, it will preferably have one (or better two) such additional transverse row adjacent to the one double row lying, closer to the handle part, looking in the lengthwise direction toward the handle part; and it will likewise have preferably one (or better two) such additional transverse row adjacent to the second double row lying closer to the head part, looking in the lengthwise direction toward the head part.
If the brush head of the invention has an additional (seventh) transverse row of vertically projecting tufts adjacent to the double row formed of the third and fourth transverse row lying closer to the handle part, looking in the lengthwise direction toward the handle part, and an additional (eighth) transverse row of vertically projecting tufts adjacent to the double row formed of the fifth and sixth transverse row lying closer to the head part, looking in the lengthwise direction toward the head part, then the seventh and eighth transverse rows are preferably spaced at a distance db of around 2.5 to around 3.5, more preferably around 2.7 to around 3.3 mm and especially preferably around 3.0 mm from the double row lying closer to the handle part or from the double row lying closer to the head part, respectively.
If the brush head of the invention has an additional (ninth) transverse row of vertically projecting tufts adjacent to the seventh transverse row looking in the lengthwise direction toward the handle part, and an additional (tenth) transverse row of vertically projecting tufts adjacent to the eighth transverse row looking in the lengthwise direction toward the head part, then the ninth transverse row is preferably spaced at a distance dc of around 5.0 to around 6.0 mm, more preferably around 5.2 to around 5.8 mm, and especially preferably around 5.5 mm from the double row lying closer to the handle part; and the tenth transverse row is preferably spaced at a distance of around 4.9 to around 5.9 mm, more preferably around 5.2 to around 5.6 mm, and especially preferably around 5.4 mm from the double row lying closer to the head part.
The heights hb and hcd of the tufts of the seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth transverse row are preferably around 10.0 to around 13.0 mm, more preferably around 11.0 to around 12.0 mm and especially preferably around 11.3 to around 11.7 mm. Especially preferably, the heights hb and hcd are equal to the height ha of the tufts of the first and second transverse row.
As for the heights ha, hb and hcd of the vertically projecting tufts, it should be mentioned that these can be mean heights when these tufts contain pointed bristles or consist of them, because these are preferably not trimmed and therefore the individual bristles can have different heights.
In the context of the present application, distances between two transverse rows of tufts are generally measured as the distance between two imaginary lines, each one joining the midpoints of the cross sectional areas of the tufts of one transverse row and the midpoints of the cross sectional areas of the tufts of the other transverse row. In order to determine the distance d between the preferably present first and second transverse row of vertically projecting tufts of pointed bristles, from the distance of the transverse rows as determined above one further subtracts the diameter of the tufts present in these two transverse rows. The distance in the lengthwise direction of the brush head between one transverse row of vertically projecting tufts and one transverse row of x-wise crossing tufts is the mean value of a) the distance between the transverse row in question and the one transverse row forming the double row, and b) the distance between the transverse row in question and the second transverse row forming the double row. This pertains to the distances db, dc, and dd. The distance dxx between two double rows of x-wise crossing tufts is the mean value of a) the distance between the forward slanting transverse row of the first double row and the backward slanting transverse row of the to second double row, and b) the distance between the backward slanting transverse row of the first double row and the forward slanting transverse row of the second double row.
The pointed bristles can consist of any material that is usually employed for pointed tooth brush bristles. Preferably, the bristles are made from a polyester, especially a poly(C2-C8)alkylene terephthalate, wherein the (C2-C8)alkylene is preferably unbranched. More preferably, the bristle materials are polyethylene terephthalate, polypropylene terephthalate, polybutylene terephthalate and polypentylene terephthalate; polybutylene terephthalate is especially preferred.
The cylindrical bristles can consist of any material that is usually employed for tooth brush bristles. Preferably, the nonpointed bristles are made from a polyamide, which is made from a preferably unbranched (C2-C8)-1,.omega.-diamine and a preferably unbranched (C4-C14)-1,.omega.-dicarboxylic acid. More preferably, the bristle materials for the cylindrical bristles are polydimethylene adipamide, polytrimethylene adipamide, polytetramethylene adipamide, polypentamethylene adipamide, polyhexamethylene adipamide, polydimethylene dodecanamide, polytrimethylene dodecanamide, polytetramethylene dodecanamide, polypentamethylene dodecanamide, polyhexamethylene dodecanamide. Polyhexamethylene dodecanamide is especially preferred.
The brush head of the invention can be used for a manual tooth brush or for an electric tooth brush. The bristles arranged on the brush head will be set in motion either by manual movements, by motor operation, or by sonic waves.
The manufacture of the brush heads according to the invention can be done by analogy with the manufacture of already known brush heads.
To make the tufts, one can use one-ended or two-ended pointed bristles.
The holes of the bristle carrier serving to accommodate the tufts can be drilled into the bristle carrier in advance at any desired angle α or β, preferably they can also be made directly during the production of the bristle carrier through injection molding, making use of perforated dies. The holes are preferably of circular cross section in order to make possible the preferred circular cross section of the tufts.
If, for the vertically projecting tufts, one uses pointed and cylindrical bristles mixed in any desired ratio, the tuft is preferably anchored in a hole of the bristle carrier by means of an anchor plate or a loop. All bristles of the tuft being formed are grasped in U-shaped fashion inside the hole, so that both ends of each bristle protrude from the hole. As a rule, the holes here are not continuous. The proportion of pointed ends of the tuft is exactly equal to the proportion of double pointed bristles used.
When one-ended pointed and cylindrical bristles are mixed in a vertically projecting tuft or only one-ended pointed bristles are used, the tuft on the one hand can be anchored as before in the hole or it can be made by the familiar AFT (“anchor free tufting”) method. In this method, the bristles are introduced into a carrier plate, which has continuous holes, and the bristles of each tuft are welded together by a hot stamp at the back-side hole opening. The bristles then protrude from the front-side hole opening of the carrier plate. The plate provided with the tufts can then be cast or welded in a brush head. Details of this method are described in, say, EP-A-0 405 204. The proportion of pointed ends in the tuft in the production variant with anchoring is equal to half the proportion of one-ended pointed bristles used; when using the AFT method, it is precisely equal to this proportion used.
The slanted tufts which contain only cylindrical bristles are preferably trimmed to a uniform height according to the invention. The vertically projecting tufts, which can contain pointed or cylindrical, or mixed pointed and cylindrical bristles, or only pointed bristles are preferably not trimmed according to the invention. When making prototypes, the selective trimming of tufts containing only nonpointed bristles can be done most easily with small, pointed scissors, such as microscope scissors. In mass production, the steps of implanting the slanted tufts with cylindrical bristles, the trimming and optional rounding of the bristles of these tufts, and finally the implanting of the vertically projecting tufts, consisting in part or entirely of pointed bristles, can be carried out in the indicated series in separate, consecutive work processes. The machinery and details of the process for each step are familiar to the person skilled in the art.
Referring to
A first especially preferred embodiment of the brush head of the invention (
Similarly to the above described embodiment, other especially preferred embodiments of the invented brush head can be configured as described in the following table 6. In these further embodiments, all numerical parameters which are not specified are as in the previously described first embodiment. The meaning of the variables in the column headings is the same as in the first embodiment described above. The columns “Besatzb” [complement b] and “Besatzcd” [complement cd] indicate the type of bristles in the tufts of the seventh and eighth, or the ninth and tenth transverse row, respectively; “n” means “nonpointed, cylindrical” and “z” means “pointed”.
It is evident from
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1364/06 | Aug 2006 | CH | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/CH2007/000405 | 8/17/2007 | WO | 00 | 12/7/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/022480 | 2/28/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3085273 | Cowan | Apr 1963 | A |
3295156 | Brant | Jan 1967 | A |
4081876 | Pugh | Apr 1978 | A |
5446940 | Curtis et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5533227 | Ito et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5628082 | Moskovich | May 1997 | A |
6405401 | Hellerud et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6546586 | Cho | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6643886 | Moskovich et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
20020162183 | Cho | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030115708 | Edwards et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030163881 | Driesen et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040070258 | Kwon | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050268414 | Kim | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060090276 | Sorrentino | May 2006 | A1 |
20060096053 | Fischer et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070039113 | Kwon et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080201886 | Bielfeldt et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080271276 | Garberg et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20100223746 | Mueller | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2618383 | Feb 2007 | CA |
2469905 | Jan 2002 | CN |
2572828 | Sep 2003 | CN |
2596838 | Jan 2004 | CN |
2708742 | Jul 2005 | CN |
0 405 204 | Jan 1991 | EP |
0405204 | Jan 1991 | EP |
0 449 653 | Oct 1991 | EP |
0 596 633 | Dec 1997 | EP |
0885573 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0 885 573 | May 2003 | EP |
1 425 989 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1 234 525 | Oct 2004 | EP |
2331981 | Jun 1977 | FR |
2624360 | Jun 1989 | FR |
2624360 | Jun 1989 | FR |
09-206131 | Aug 1997 | JP |
0130932 | Apr 1998 | KR |
2020846 | Oct 1994 | RU |
WO 9923910 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 0025631 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 03073958 | Sep 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion from the International Bureau for International Application No. PCT/CH2007/000405 dated Mar. 17, 2009. |
International Search Report from the European Patent Office as Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/CH2007/000405 dated Dec. 3, 2007. |
Decision on Grant from the Patent Office of the Russian Federation for corresponding Russian Patent Application No. 2009110775/12(014641) dated Mar. 23, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100101038 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |