Toothbrush

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6553604
  • Patent Number
    6,553,604
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 16, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 29, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A toothbrush includes a handle, a head extending from the handle, and a plurality of tooth cleaning elements, such as tufts of bristles, extending from the head. Each tooth cleaning element is supported for rotation about primarily only one axis. Each tooth cleaning element is rotatable independent of the other tooth cleaning element(s).
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The invention relates generally to the field of oral care, and in particular to toothbrushes.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




A Japanese patent document having an application number of 3-312978 discloses a toothbrush having a multiplicity of tufts of nylon bristles. In a first embodiment shown in

FIGS. 1

,


2


and


3


, a plurality of cylindrical recessed sections in the head are set orthogonally to the longitudinal axial direction of a shank and are formed at equal intervals. Column-shaped rotary bodies


5


are respectively contained in the recessed sections. On the peripheral surfaces of the rotary bodies


5


, along the axial direction, projected strip sections


5




a


are formed, and they are set in a state that they are positioned at the opening sections of the recessed sections. At the opening sections of the recessed sections, contact surfaces to be positioned on both the sides are formed. At both the ends of the upper surfaces of the projected strip sections


5




a,


nylon bristles


6


are arranged to be vertically erected.




As shown in

FIG. 3

, the arrangement described above allows bristles


6


to rotate during use of the brush. A problem with this brush is that two tufts of bristles are secured to each strip section


5




a


and thus must rotate in unison. As a result, an individual tuft of bristles cannot rotate independently of its “partner” tuft. The individual tuft may thus be prevented from achieving optimal penetration between two teeth during brushing because the partner tuft might contact the teeth in a different manner and interfere with rotation of the individual tuft.





FIGS. 4

,


5


and


6


disclose a second embodiment in which each tuft of bristles is secured to the head by a ball and socket type arrangement. While this embodiment allows each tuft of bristles to swivel independent of the other tufts, it does have disadvantages. If a tuft of bristles is tilted out towards the side of the head and that tuft is positioned near the interface between the side and top surfaces of the teeth, chances are increased that the bristle tips will not even be in contact with the teeth during brushing. Further, random orientation in which the tufts can end up after brushing detracts from the attractiveness of the brush.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is directed to overcoming one or more of the problems set forth above. Briefly summarized, according to one aspect of the present invention, a toothbrush includes a handle, a head extending from the handle, and a plurality of tooth cleaning elements, such as tufts of bristles, extending from the head. Each tooth cleaning element is supported for rotation about primarily only one axis. Each tooth cleaning element is rotatable independent of the other tooth cleaning element(s).




By having each tooth cleaning element supported for rotation about only one axis, the problems mentioned above for the ball and socket tuft support are avoided. That is, the chances are increased that the tooth cleaning element will remain in contact with teeth during brushing and the brush will be more attractive in appearance.




Further, as each tooth cleaning element is rotatable independent of the other tooth cleaning element(s), the problem discussed above with the first Japanese embodiment is avoided. Each tooth cleaning element can achieve optimal interdental penetration without interference from rotation by another tooth cleaning element.




These and other aspects, objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be more clearly understood and appreciated from a review of the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments and appended claims, and by reference to the accompanying drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a perspective view of a toothbrush according to a first embodiment of the invention;





FIG. 2

is a partial sectional view of the head of the toothbrush of FIG.


1


and one of the tooth cleaning elements;





FIG. 3

is a sectional view taken along the lines


3





3


of

FIG. 2

;





FIG. 4

is a front view of an alternative tooth cleaning element; and





FIG. 5

is a side view of the tooth cleaning element of FIG.


4


.





FIG. 6

is a graph showing interproximal residence time of mobile tufts and fixed tufts in the interdental gap(s).











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




Beginning with

FIG. 1

, a toothbrush


8


includes a handle


10


from which extends a head


12


. Head


12


includes a first group of tooth cleaning elements


14


, such as tufts of bristles, which are secured to the head in a conventional manner (e.g. by stapling or hot-tufting). Elements


14


are designed to clean the exposed surfaces of teeth.




A second group of tooth cleaning elements


16


are secured to head


12


such that each element can independently rotate about a single axis during use of the brush. Each elements


16


can be a tuft of bristles or, alternatively, a single unitary fin made of plastic or rubber. Elements


16


are designed to penetrate in between teeth to clean the interdental spaces.




The interproximal residence time of elements


16


is significantly increased as compared to elements


14


which are rigidly fixed to head


12


. An experiment was conducted in which the interproximal residence time was determined for fixed tufts at both a 0 degree (like element


14


) and 16 degree forward angle, and for rotating tufts such as element


16


. The tufts had an average of 40 bristles each with each bristle having a 7-mil diameter. Residence times were measured on a Single Filament Tester (SFT) with a load of 4 g/tuft at velocities between 0.5 and 10 in/s.




The graph of

FIG. 6

shows interproximal residence time of mobile tufts and fixed tufts in the interdental gap(s). The data are averages over 4 experiments. The error bars represent the error of the mean at the 95% confidence level. This experimental data shows that rotating tufts experience 1.6 times more interproximal residence time compared to angled fixed bristle tufts, and 2.7 times more interproximal residence time compared to vertical fixed bristle tufts. More interproximal residence time translates into better cleaning between teeth .




With reference to

FIGS. 2 and 3

, the structure for enabling element


16


to rotate and its methods of manufacture will be described. Element


16


includes at its lower end a unitary bearing


18


which is cylindrical in shape and rounded at its ends. Bearing


18


can be formed by either melting some of the material from which element


16


is made, or by molding the bearing in a separate molding operation.




Such a molding operation would use a high flow material such as Exxon Escorene Polypropylene PP-1105, or FINA Polypropylene 3824. It is important to gate from both sides and to have very low pack pressure during the molding operation. An undercut on element


16


is preferable in order to secure bearing


18


to element


16


. If bearing


18


is molded separately and then secured to element


16


, an adhesive can be used in place of the undercut to secure element


16


and bearing


18


together.




An example of a specific molding operation would be to use a 90 Ton Toshiba Injection Molding Machine to mold Exxon Escorene Polypropylene PP-1105. The temperature profile is a 350 F. barrel temperature, a 350 F. rear temperature, a 405 F. front temperature and a 390 F. nozzle temperature. The mold temperature is preferably about 90 F., and a {fraction (1/16)} inch nozzle should be used. Fill time is 0.25 seconds, screw forward time is 3.75 seconds, injection time is 4.00 seconds and cool time is 15 seconds. Peak hydraulic pressure is 250 psi.




Head


12


is actually made up of a top piece


22


and a bottom piece


24


. Both of these pieces are created in separate molding steps with piece


22


being integrally molded with the brush handle. Element


16


is inserted through an aperture


25


in top piece


22


bearing end last to the position shown in the figures. Aperture


25


includes a bearing socket


20


which captures bearing


18


. It is preferable to insert a viscous substance, such as some food-grade grease, into socket


20


to provide some resistance to rotation of element


16


to prevent the element from loosely flopping back and forth. Finally, piece


24


is fixed to piece


22


to secure bearing


18


in socket


20


. Piece


24


can be secured to piece


22


by, for example, snap features (not shown) or heat welding. Alternatively, piece


24


can be injection molded into place.




An alternative manufacturing method to using two pieces


22


,


24


for the head is to injection mold the entire head (and handle) about bearing


18


. A higher melting temperature material would need to be used for element


16


and bearing


18


so that they are not softened/melted during injection molding of the head/handle. Element


16


can be exercised after completion of the brush by rotating the element back and forth to free it in the event some plastic from the head is interfering with rotation.




The arrangement described above allows element


16


to rotate back and forth about only one axis


26


which is preferably substantially perpendicular to a long axis of element i


6


. Preferably, element


16


can rotate about 30 degrees either side of vertical. The top of aperture


25


limits the amount of rotation that can be experienced by element


16


. It should be noted that there is no spring force or other force which returns element


16


to a home position, so the element can end up at any one of an infinite number of positions along its 60 degree freedom of movement at the end of the brushing process.




Alternatively, bearing


18


could be made in a spherical shape. Use of such a spherical bearing would still only allow element


16


to rotate about only one axis because, as shown in

FIG. 2

, head


12


fits up against opposite sides of element


16


, thereby restricting rotation to occurring about one axis only.




Turning to

FIGS. 4 and 5

, an alternative tooth cleaning element will be described. Element


30


includes a tooth cleaning portion


32


which can be a tuft of bristles or a unitary plastic or rubber fin. A hinge


34


(e.g. a living hinge) made of a soft plastic or elastomer is injection molded onto cleaning portion


32


. The material from which hinge


34


is made must be carefully selected, because if it is too soft, retention of element


16


will be poor, and if the material is too hard, the hinge will not be flexible enough. The hinge is preferably made of GLS Corp.'s DYNAFLEX thermoplastic rubber compound G2780 or G2711 and can be injection molded under the conditions outlined above. The living hinge allows cleaning portion


32


to rotate primarily only about an axis


36


which, as described above, is preferably substantially perpendicular to a long axis of portion


32


. Resistance to rotation increases as portion


32


is moved away from a position vertical to the top surface of the brush head. A toothbrush head


38


with integral handle (not shown) is injection molded about a base portion of living hinge


34


to capture the living hinge in the head (see FIG.


4


).




The invention has been described with reference to a preferred embodiment. However, it will be appreciated that variations and modifications can be effected by a person of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A toothbrush, comprising;a handle; a head extending from the handle; and a plurality of tufts of bristles extending from the head, each tuft of bristles being supported for rotation about only one axis, each tuft of bristles being rotatable independent of the other tuft(s) of bristles.
  • 2. The toothbrush of claim 1, wherein each tuft has a range of rotation of about 60 degrees.
  • 3. The toothbrush of claim 1, wherein each tuft can rotate about 30 degrees to either side of a vertical position in which the tuft is perpendicular to a top surface of the head.
  • 4. The toothbrush of claim 1, further including at least one tooth cleaning element which cannot be rotated.
  • 5. The toothbrush of claim 1, wherein each tuft includes at its non-brushing end a bearing which is substantially cylindrical in shape in its major portion, each bearing being secured in its own hollow space within the head, each bearing allowing rotation of its respective tuft.
  • 6. The toothbrush of claim 5, wherein the head is made of at least two pieces which are joined together to secure the bearing within the head.
  • 7. The toothbrush of claim 5, wherein a viscous substance is provided in each hollow space in the head to provide some resistance to rotation of the tufts.
  • 8. The toothbrush of claim 1, wherein a portion of the head limits rotation of each tuft.
  • 9. The toothbrush of claim 1, wherein the tufts are rotated by contact with a portion of an oral cavity.
  • 10. The toothbrush of claim 1, wherein each tuft includes at its non-brushing end a living hinge, each living hinge being secured partially within the head, each living hinge allowing rotation of its respective tuft.
  • 11. The toothbrush of claim 1, wherein the axis about which each tuft is rotatable is substantially perpendicular to a long axis of the element.
US Referenced Citations (23)
Number Name Date Kind
2263802 Grusin Nov 1941 A
2486847 Hokett Nov 1949 A
2604649 Stephenson et al. Jul 1952 A
2637870 Cohen May 1953 A
2882544 Hadidian Apr 1959 A
2935755 Leira May 1960 A
3110918 Tate Nov 1963 A
3129449 Cyzer Apr 1964 A
4114222 Serediuk Sep 1978 A
4633542 Taravel Jan 1987 A
4694844 Berl et al. Sep 1987 A
4776054 Rauch Oct 1988 A
5269038 Bradley Dec 1993 A
5357644 Theriault Oct 1994 A
5398366 Bradley Mar 1995 A
5435032 McDougall Jul 1995 A
5528786 Porat et al. Jun 1996 A
5799354 Amir Sep 1998 A
5802656 Dawson et al. Sep 1998 A
5813079 Halm Sep 1998 A
5839148 Volpenhein Nov 1998 A
5896614 Flewitt Apr 1999 A
5991959 Raven et al. Nov 1999 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (8)
Number Date Country
1 210 409 Feb 1966 DE
003928919 Mar 1991 DE
19817704 Apr 1998 DE
0 857 026 Jan 2000 EP
0 972 464 Jan 2000 EP
405076416 Mar 1993 JP
SU 1752336 May 1990 RU
WO 9937181 Jul 1999 WO