The present invention relates to the general art of structural, bridge and geotechnical engineering, and to the particular field of overfilled arch and/or cut-and-cover structures.
Frequently, overfilled arch structures formed of precast or cast-in-place reinforced concrete are used in the case of bridges to support one pathway over a second pathway, which can be a waterway, a traffic route, or in the case of other structures, a storage space or the like. The terms “overfilled arch” or “overfilled bridge” will be understood from the teaching of the present disclosure, and in general as used herein, an overfilled bridge or an overfilled arch is a bridge formed of arch elements that rest on the ground or on a foundation and has soil or the like resting thereon and thereabout to support and stabilize the structure and in the case of a bridge provide the surface of the second pathway. The arch form is generally arcuate such as cylindrical in circumferential shape, and in particular a prolate shape; however, other shapes can be used. Examples of overfilled bridges are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,482,406 and 4,458,457, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Presently, reinforced concrete overfilled arches are usually constructed by either casting the arch in place or placing precast elements, or a combination of these. These arched structures rest on prepared foundations at the bottom of both sides of the arch. The fill material, at the sides of the arch (backfill material) serves to diminish the outward displacements of the structure when the structure is loaded from above. As used herein, the term “soil” is intended to refer to the normal soil, which can be backfill or in situ, located at a site used for a bridge structure, and which would not otherwise adequately support an arch. The terms “backfill,” and “in situ” will be used to mean such “soil” as well.
Soil is not mechanically strong enough to adequately support bridge structures of interest to this invention. Thus, prior art bridge structures have been constructed to transfer forces associated with the structure to walls of the structure and/or large concrete foundations at the base of the wall. Such walls have to be constructed in a manner that will support such forces and thus have special construction requirements. As will be discussed below, such requirements present drawbacks and disadvantages to such prior art structures.
For the prior art structures, the overfilled arches are normally formed such that the foundation level of the arch is at the approximate level of a lower pathway or floor surface of an underground structure over which the arch spans. Referring to
Furthermore, as it is necessary to limit the arch loading and bending actions in the top and sides of prior art overfilled arch systems to an acceptable level, the radius of the arch is in practice restricted. This restriction in arch radius leads to a higher “rise” R1 and R2 (vertical dimension between the top of clearance profile C1 and C2 of lower pathway surface LS1 or LS2 and crown CR1 and CR2 of the arch) in the arch profile than is often desirable for the economical and practical arrangement of the two pathways and formation of the works surrounding and covering the arch. This results in a lost height LH1 and LH2 which can be substantial in some cases.
Beams or slabs, while needing a larger thickness than arches, do not require this “rise” and, therefore, can be used for bridges accommodating a smaller height between the top of the clearance profile of the lower pathway and the top of the upper pathway. Arches, despite their economical advantage, often cannot compete with structures using beams or slabs for this reason especially for larger spans. However, the larger thickness may result in an expensive structure whose precast elements may be difficult unwieldy and heavy to transport to a building site. Thus, many of the advantages of this structure may be offset or vitiated.
Furthermore, as indicated in
For overfilled arches made of precast construction, the incorporation of the required height of the sides or sidewalls of the arch result either in a tall-standing precast element which is difficult and unwieldy to transport and to place or in the requirement of pedestals, such as pedestals F1a shown in FIG. 1A.
It is a main object of the present invention to provide an economical and expeditiously erected overfilled arch structure system and method of forming an overfilled arch structure system.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an arch structure system and method of forming an arch structure system that utilizes soil to create a foundation for the arch structure.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an arch structure and system and method of forming an arch structure and system that does not transfer forces associated with an arch element directly to walls of the arch structure and system whereby the walls are not required to support a significant amount of these forces.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an overfilled arch bridge or other structure and method of construction therefor which enables a minimal arch curvature to be adopted.
It is another object of the present invention to minimize the rise of the arch and hence extend the scope of application of the arch while still maintaining a structural arching action in the arch of the overfilled structure.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an overfilled arch bridge structure and method of construction therefor which enables the sides/sidewalls of the overfilled structure to be of a lighter and therefore more economical design and faster methods of construction as compared to the prior art.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an overfilled arch bridge structure which enables such a structure to be constructed using poor quality backfill material.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an overfilled arch bridge structure and method of construction therefor which enables the footings at the base of the overfilled structure to be smaller than the prior art.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an overfilled arch bridge structure and method of construction therefor which enables the footings at the base of the overfilled structure to be omitted.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an overfilled arch bridge structure and method of construction therefor which enables the footings at the base of the overfilled structure to be reduced to very small dimensions serving only for the erection of sidewalls.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an overfilled arched bridge and method of construction therefor which reduces dependence on large and unwieldy element transportation and reliance on heavy erection cranes as compared to the prior art.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an overfilled arched bridge which is expeditious to produce.
These, and other, objects are achieved by an arched overfilled and/or backfilled structure which includes a shallow arch spanning over a clear space. The sides of the clear space are formed by curved or planar walls. Solidified zones of the backfill material or previously existing (in situ) ground against the footings at the springs, also referred to as ends, of the arch and/or behind the walls form foundation blocks which are in intimate contact with the footings at the arch springs and/or with the upper part of the walls in such a way that the arch delivers all or at least most of its support forces into the aforementioned foundation blocks, drastically reducing the normal forces, shear forces and bending moments in the walls and wall foundations. The arch structure contacts the foundation blocks in a manner that the support forces of the arch are transferred to the foundation blocks rather than to the sidewalls of the system. The resulting advantages of transferring such forces to the foundation blocks rather than to the sidewalls will be understood from the teaching of the present disclosure.
The arched structure system which is formed using precast concrete, or cast-in-place concrete, or a combination of both comprises either:
The foundation blocks of the present invention comprise a material exhibiting sufficient stiffness and strength such that the thrust reactions of the arch can be distributed via the arch footings through the foundation block to the adjacent soil material, such that the displacements of the arch springs are within acceptable limits. Shallow arches, as in the present invention, are particularly susceptible to horizontal outward displacements of the springs. The structure of the present invention ensures that the solid foundations, which are essential for such an arch, can be provided economically.
By enabling a load transfer from the springs of the arch via the arch footings into the foundation blocks, the arch support forces do not need to be transferred into the sidewalls of the earth overfilled system. This characteristic of the system embodying the present invention enables the backfilling of the sidewalls to be combined with the construction of the foundation blocks because all or part of the solidified backfill of the sidewalls or the solidified in situ ground directly constitutes the arch foundation blocks. This also enables more efficient construction procedures to be adopted for construction of the walls, which can be made considerably lighter than prior art systems.
Furthermore, by enabling direct transfer of the arch support forces into the foundation blocks at the top of the sidewalls, it is possible to adopt a flatter arch than is possible and economic for the conventional state of the art. This is because the loads and bending moments transferred into the sidewalls of a conventional overfilled arch are significantly larger for a flatter arch than for a higher (less flat) arch. A flatter arch (smaller arch rise) has the advantage that for a given clearance beneath the sides of the arch, the lost height (see lost height LH1 and LH2 in
The present invention also includes a cover-and-cut method of such a system.
While a bridge system is discussed herein, it is to be understood that the present invention can be applied to other systems as well without departing from the scope of the present disclosure and invention. For example, any type of underground space (including, but not limited to, shelters, warehouses, storage spaces, backfilled and overfilled, or only backfilled or built into existing in situ ground) can be within the scope of the present invention and disclosure and it is intended that the present invention as defined by the teaching of this disclosure and the claims associated therewith will cover such structures as well.
Other objects, features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from a consideration of the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings.
As will be understood from the teaching of the present disclosure, instead of one footing (which may be in reinforced concrete) that distributes the horizontal and vertical support forces, the system embodying the present invention includes a small arch footing at the springs of the arch plus a large foundation block on which the arch footing rests. Thus, the stresses on the soil (ground) are distributed in two stages, which is more effective and less expensive than prior art systems. The foundation block of the present invention, while large in volume, is still relatively inexpensive because the backfill needs to be well compacted anyway, the present invention merely adds stabilizing materials. The present invention can use poor material which otherwise may be unsuitable for backfilling a normal bridge, by making it suitable through adding stabilizing materials, thus creating a foundation block. The arch of the present system contacts the thus-formed foundation blocks via the arch footings, in a manner to transfer all or at least most of the arch support forces to the foundation block. In practice, this reduces or eliminates the forces applied to the sidewall and to the wall footings thereby resulting in concomitant advantages. In most cases, the sidewalls are connected to the foundation blocks and are therefore held in place by the foundation block or blocks. The large dimensions of the foundation block together with its weight allows such an advantageous force/stress distribution, with outward (horizontal) movements/displacements of the arch ends (springs) being minimized in a very economical manner, even where relatively soft soil exits beneath the foundation block. This feature of the invention is especially advantageous for a relatively flat arch. Flat arches are used in conjunction with wide clearances with a minimum of lost height LH (
Referring to
Structure 10 can be located between first selected area 30 which can be the floor of a void or a lower pathway, and which includes a plane 32, and a second selected area 34 which can be a roof of a void or an upper pathway which includes a plane 36. The arch span comprises reinforced or unreinforced concrete, which may be manufactured as precast elements or cast in place or a combination of these means.
The arch span is founded via arch footings and foundation blocks 40 and 42 on general earth backfill 20 and/or on in situ soil (the surface of the previously existing (in situ) subsoil having been excavated to that extent). Foundation blocks 40 and 42 are each placed behind corresponding sidewalls 16 and 18 respectively of the overfilled and/or backfilled arch structure during its construction. Arch footings 48 and 50, formed of concrete or reinforced concrete are interposed between springs 44 and 46 which will also be referred to as ends of arch span 12 and the foundation blocks to further distribute forces over a wide area as indicated by arrows 54 thus also reducing the strength and stiffness requirements of the solidified fill material. As can be understood from the figures, especially
As indicated by arrows 56 in
Walls 16 and 18 may be constructed independently of, and before, arch 12 and can be designed primarily for the purpose of retaining the backfill soil placed at the outside of the backfilled structure; or as a continuation of the concrete arch span so as to be one-piece and monolithic therewith as indicated by system 10′ shown in
Independently constructed sidewalls may comprise mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) using precast wall panels or any other type of earth retaining wall, including but not limited to sheet piles, bored piles or an excavated cast-in-place (cip), precast or sprayed (shotcrete) concrete wall with or without nails/anchors. The independence of sidewall and arch construction enables the construction process to be staged as independent activities i.e. construction of the sidewalls and solidified backfill, and subsequent placement of the arch and overfill of the structure.
Since all or at least most of the arch support forces are directed onto the foundation blocks, wall foundations 57 and 58 respectively can be designed to be very small as compared to wall foundations F1 and F2, or omitted completely.
As can be understood by comparing
Since the foundation blocks of the present system are located behind the sidewalls, they are less at risk when scour problems are present, than the footings of prior art systems.
The foundation blocks of the present invention are simpler, cheaper and can be faster to build than prior art footings. An additional advantage is that general earthworks machinery may be used for their construction rather than specialist equipment used for placing concrete.
Earth material unsuitable for backfill in prior art systems can be made suitable for the system of the present invention even for the solidified backfill zones (foundation blocks), by using cement, lime or other solidifying materials and/or treatment.
The foundation blocks are unreinforced (except by anchors, mostly synthetic anchors in some forms of the invention) and therefore are more durable and longlasting compared to prior art systems. In the case of cement or lime treatments, the foundation blocks actually become harder over time; they cannot deteriorate.
Because the system of the present invention primarily uses earth material available at the site, the system of the present invention has several ecological advantages, including less transportation (less air pollution), and less exploitation of valuable gravel resources. There is even the possibility of backfilling the wall with environmentally hazardous materials which in some cases become harmless when mixed with cement, lime or other additive.
Furthermore, by comparing the system shown in
There are many alternative forms of the present invention. One form of the invention is the case where the upper pathway plane 36 (in
Also, as shown in
Furthermore, any or all of the systems of the present invention can include reinforcing elements RE in either or both the arch and/or the sidewalls as indicated in
The system of the present invention can also be used in conjunction with a cover-and-cut technique. As indicated in
As indicated in
The above disclosure has been directed to a straight bridge structure; however, the above-disclosed means and methods can be applied to curved or angular shapes in plan view or in longitudinal section as well without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
As discussed above, the present invention can also be embodied in a domed structure. As shown in plan view in
The dome embodiment of the present invention has an advantage that the solidified backfill (foundation block) avoids the need for circumferential tie rods (at the spring level of the dome) because of the rigidity of the foundation block.
It is also noted that the scope of the present disclosure also includes not solely bridges with pathways on top and under it, but also any kind of underground space, with one or several openings for access, exit, etc.
Still further, the system embodying the present invention can be used in connection with other forms of bridges as well, such as a multi-arch structure 200 shown in
It is noted that the contact between the arch structures and the foundation blocks in systems 200, 300 and 400 is identical to the contact between the arch structures and the foundation blocks discussed above. Accordingly, such contact will not be discussed in detail, but reference is directed to the above discussion.
Furthermore, as indicated in
As illustrated in
It is understood that while certain forms of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, it is not to be limited to the specific forms or arrangements of parts described and shown.
This application is a divisional application of Ser. No. 10/102,921, filed Mar. 22, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,719,492.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3482406 | Schuppisser et al. | Dec 1969 | A |
3750407 | Heierli et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3999394 | Eberhardt et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4221502 | Tanikawa | Sep 1980 | A |
4300320 | Rooney | Nov 1981 | A |
4390306 | Fisher | Jun 1983 | A |
4458457 | Heierli | Jul 1984 | A |
4490950 | Heierli | Jan 1985 | A |
4537529 | FitzSimmons | Aug 1985 | A |
4558969 | FitzSimmons | Dec 1985 | A |
4587684 | Miller | May 1986 | A |
4595314 | Lockwood | Jun 1986 | A |
4687371 | Lockwood | Aug 1987 | A |
4695187 | Mikhailovsky et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4704754 | Bonasso | Nov 1987 | A |
4745713 | Gotoh | May 1988 | A |
4797030 | Lockwood | Jan 1989 | A |
4854775 | Lockwood | Aug 1989 | A |
4993872 | Lockwood | Feb 1991 | A |
5281053 | Matiere | Jan 1994 | A |
5439319 | Flanagan et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5836717 | Bernini | Nov 1998 | A |
D406902 | Lockwood | Mar 1999 | S |
6161342 | Barbier et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6243994 | Bernini | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6434892 | Heierli | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6460213 | Flint et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6719492 | Heierli | Apr 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
395894 | Mar 1993 | AT |
0393197 | Oct 1990 | EP |
07003826 | Jun 1995 | JP |
397981 | Aug 1994 | NL |
9300550 | Oct 1994 | NL |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040182017 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10102921 | Mar 2002 | US |
Child | 10739734 | US |