The field of the invention is hydro-demolition devices and methods for cutting openings into structural surfaces.
Hydraulic demolition, also known as hydro-demolition, is a well-known art practiced by forcing an erosive material, generally a liquid such as water, through nozzles at sufficiently high pressure to produce a jet stream that disintegrates the materials of which buildings and structures are made thereby deconstructing the structural surface.
The term “structural surface” as used herein includes vertical walls, angled walls, curved walls, and any type of structural surface regardless of orientation or function that is amenable to having an opening cut therein by the apparatus and method disclosed below.
The terms “cut,” “cutting,” and “deconstructing” are used interchangeably herein to refer to the use of hydro-demolition technology to remove constituent material from a structural surface.
“Work-face” is used herein to refer to the area of a structural surface that is to be deconstructed.
The noun “opening” is used herein to refer to a hole that is cut into a structural surface, including a hole that does not completely penetrate the surface. The term “sides” when used without a modifier refers to the interior surfaces of such an opening, including the top, bottom, and lateral sides of the interior of the opening.
Hydro-demolition technology is often employed to cut openings in walls and other substantially vertical surfaces, and a number of hydro-demolition machines and techniques have been developed for these purposes.
In the art is it is well known to mount hydro-demolition devices on vehicles or platforms that are positioned on the ground. Generally, a lift-mechanism must be provided that is mounted on the ground, either directly or on a platform, and raises the cutting nozzles to the appropriate height to reach the work-face. This approach in which hydro-demolition equipment is supported by the ground is referred to herein as “bottom-up” hydro-demolition.
There are at least two significant problems with such a bottom-up approach to deconstructing structures with hydro-demolition equipment. First, it is necessary to have the machinery and, possibly, workmen, beneath the work-face. Because debris, eroded material, and water all fall downwards from the work-face under the force of gravity, the machinery and people working below the work-face can become soaked, coated with debris, and/or injured by the falling materials. The second significant problem is that there are limits as to how high such hydro-demolition devices can lift the nozzles. When working with very tall structures, a bottom-up approach to hydro-demolition is often not possible because the work-face is at a height that a cherry-picker or other lift-means cannot reach, or if they can, the resulting high center of gravity renders the equipment so unstable as to cause a hazard to workers.
For instance, in the field of nuclear reactors it is periodically necessary to deconstruct large areas from the reactor walls in order to make repairs to the walls or to structures embedded within the walls, such as tensioning tendons. As dozens of nuclear reactors approach and pass their life expectancy, it is also becoming commonplace to remove large pieces of equipment such as generators from the interior of the reactor for maintenance or replacement. In order to do this, it is often more economical to cut an opening in the wall of the reactor and remove the equipment through the opening rather than disassemble the equipment and take it out piece by piece through an existing “door,” so to speak. Given the thickness and structural complexity of reactor walls, and given the substantial heights above the ground at which the openings have to be cut, deconstructing such large structures presents formidable challenges that cannot be overcome effectively with existing hydro-demolition technology.
Complicating these problems is the fact that the structural surfaces of reactors are often three or more feet thick. Thus, the cutting nozzle must be able to advance a number of feet into an opening that may be hundreds of feet off of the ground.
Conventional “cherry-picker” and crane type devices do not suffice for these jobs; besides, they are dangerous because they require workers to be at or near the base of the wall while it is being deconstructed.
The present invention resolves the problem of how to carry out hydro-demolition deconstruction on very tall structural surfaces such as the walls of large nuclear reactors and tall buildings. In short, we have discovered a method and device for effectuating a top-down approach using a rigid support frame that obviates many problems that are unavoidable when working from the ground up. The device can be successfully employed and the method successfully practiced on structural surfaces of virtually any height.
The invention may be most precisely disclosed, defined, and claimed with reference to the motions and/or orientations of its various movable elements. For reasons of clarity, the term “axial” is restricted herein to movement about or around an axis, and does not include movement along an axis. The term “rectilinear” is used to denote linear movement of an element, including movement along or parallel to a linear axis. The term “rotator” is used to mean a device or mechanism that produces axial movement of an element, assembly, sub-assembly, or component-group. The term “driver” is used to mean a device or mechanism that produces rectilinear movement of an element, assembly, sub-assembly or component-group. The terms “rotator” and “driver” are understood to include components such as energy sources, motors, hydraulic pumps, belts, chains, worm gears and the like that are necessary to accomplish the desired movement. Many of such components and sub-components of the invention, including drivers and rotators, are well known in the art of hydro-demolition, and one of skill in the art, after referring to this disclosure, will be able to choose and employ the appropriate elements in order to assemble and operate the invention without undue experimentation.
The invention includes a hydro-demolition device that employs a top-down approach to gaining access to a work-face by mounting a rigid support frame for hydro-demolition nozzles above the work-face rather than mounting a support structure below the work-face.
The invention may be summarized, at least in part, by the following enumerated statements.
Statement 1. The invention includes a hydro-demolition device for deconstructing a wall at a work-fac, wherein the hydro-demolition device comprises a rigid support frame. The rigid support frame comprises a top member mounted above the work-face and at least one rigid rail member extending substantially downward from the top member. The rail member comprises at least one rail. The hydro-demolition device also comprises a carriage, wherein the carriage is connected to the rail member in a manner that permits the carriage to move up and down along the rail. The hydro-demolition device also has a driver adapted to move the carriage up and down along the rail member. The hydro-demolition device also includes at least one nozzle, wherein the nozzle is carried up and down along the rail member by the carriage.
Statement 2. The invention includes the hydro-demolition device described in Statement 1, and further includes a mounting means for mounting the top member above the work-face.
Statement 3. The invention includes the hydro-demolition device described in Statement 2, wherein the mounting means includes a car, wherein the top member is mounted on the car, and wherein the car is positioned above the work-face.
Statement 4. The invention includes the hydro-demolition device described in Statement 2, wherein the mounting means comprises at least one beam disposed substantially horizontally from the wall, wherein the top member is mounted on the beam.
Statement 5. The invention includes the hydro-demolition device described in Statement 1, wherein the top member comprises a stub-leg and wherein the rail member is connected to the stub-leg.
Statement 6. The invention includes the hydro-demolition device described in Statement 1, wherein the rail member comprises at least two rail assemblies concatenated to form the rail member.
Statement 7. The invention includes the hydro-demolition device described in Statement 1, wherein the rail member is reversibly connected to the top member.
Statement eight. The invention includes the hydro-demolition device described in Statement 1, further comprising a nozzle carrier movably attached to the carriage, wherein the nozzle is carried back and forth along the carriage by the nozzle carrier.
Statement 9. The invention includes the hydro-demolition device described in Statement 8, further comprising an extension/retraction mechanism, wherein the nozzle is carried toward and away from the wall by the extension/retraction mechanism.
Statement 10. The invention includes the hydro-demolition device described in Statement 1, further comprising an extension/retraction mechanism, wherein the nozzle is carried toward and away from the wall by the extension/retraction mechanism.
Statement 11. The invention includes the hydro-demolition device described in Statement 8, further comprising swing means for swinging the nozzle carrier about a swing axis that is orthogonal to the wall.
Statement 12. The invention includes the hydro-demolition device described in Statement 11, wherein the swing means comprises 1) a hinge between the nozzle carrier and the carriage; and, 2) a carrier rotator, wherein the swing axis is through the hinge.
Statement 13. The invention includes the hydro-demolition device described in Statement 1, wherein the vertical driver comprises: 1) at least one motor; 2) at least one axle, wherein the motor turns the axle; and, 3) at least one sprocket and chain combination that is driven by the turning of the axle, wherein the carriage is connected to the chain and is moved upwards or downwards by the sprocket and chain.
Statement 14. The invention includes the hydro-demolition device described in Statement 1, wherein the vertical driver includes at least one of: a chain and sprocket, a rotating shaft, a belt and pulley, a worm gear, a rack and pinion, and a hydraulic ram.
Statement 15. The invention includes a method of using the hydro-demolition device described in Statement 1 to deconstruct a wall, the method comprising the steps of: (a) mounting the hydro-demolition device on the wall above a work face area that is to be deconstructed so that the rail member extends downward to the work-face; (b) moving the carriage up or down along the rail member until the carriage is at a desired position adjacent the work-face; (c) orienting the nozzle at a desired angle and a desired distance from the work-face; and, (d) applying a fluid to the nozzle at a sufficiently high pressure to deconstruct the wall.
Statement 16. The invention includes a method of deconstructing a wall using a hydro-demolition device having a rigid support frame, wherein the method comprises the steps of: (a) mounting the rigid support frame on the wall above a work-face that is to be deconstructed so that a rigid rail member of the rigid support frame extends downward toward the work-face; (b) moving a carriage up or down along the rigid rail member until the carriage is at a desired position adjacent the work-face, wherein at least one nozzle is carried on the carriage; (c) orienting the nozzle a desired angle and a desired distance from the wall; and, (d) applying a fluid to the nozzle at a sufficiently high pressure to deconstruct the wall.
In the figures, elements and components are not necessarily drawn to scale. Where there is a plurality of essentially identical elements, normally only one is labeled with a reference numeral.
The present invention relates to a novel hydro-demolition system for carrying out hydro-demolition, scarifying, and surface cleaning, particularly on tall structural surfaces. Of particular interest in employing the invention is the cutting of holes, windows, indentations, etc., referred to generically herein as “openings,” in walls and other vertical structures, wherein the openings must be cut at such substantial heights off the ground that conventional hydro-demolition devices and methods cannot be easily employed.
In order to place the cutting nozzles of the invention at such substantial heights, the support frame is mounted from above the work-face and the cutting equipment is lowered to the level of the work-face. Optionally, mounting the invention may be done by exploiting existing prior art devices that are used to suspend worker-platforms from the top of structural surfaces. One example of such prior art devices is shown in
The prior art movable car 106 has horizontally disposed beams 102 that extend over the edge of the top. From these beams is suspended a platform 103.
Whilst it would be possible to simply mount hydro-demolition nozzles on such an existing platform and lower the platform down the wall, we have discovered that such an arrangement has numerous disadvantages that make it unworkable in many situations. For instance, suspending the platform with cables presents problems because of the forces produced by the water jets during hydro-demolition force the platform away from the wall. In addition, in many instances the tolerances for the openings made in the wall are so tight that excess motion of a platform suspended by cables reduces the required precision to an unsatisfactory level. As will be appreciated by referring to
The preferred embodiment of the invention includes a means for attaching a vertical rail assembly to support frame 201. This rail assembly attachment means may include a number of structures such as bolts, welds, and the like. In a preferred embodiment, the support frame 201 has stub-legs 202a/b as shown in
One aspect of the invention is a rigid means for carrying a platform, car, carriage, or other structure, referred herein generically as “carriage,” up and down along the surface of the structure. This means may include a rigid rail-assembly 400 as shown in
The two rails of the preferred embodiment are nominated here as a front or first rail 401a, and a back or rear rail 401b, wherein “front” and “back” mean toward and away from the structural surface, respectively. These two rails are connected together by means of cross-struts and supports to form a rail assembly 400. Each rail assembly has a top 402 and a bottom 403.
Various approaches to stiffening and reinforcing the rail assembly will be obvious to those of skill in the art having read this disclosure. Although it is our current preference to provide two such rail assemblies, each assembly having two rails as described below, the invention could be practiced with any number of rails that support nozzles or a carriage.
Each of the two rail assemblies is attached to the horizontal support frame 201 by attaching the top 402 of the rail assembly 400 to the bottom of stub-legs 202a. In this way the rail assemblies are attached to and extend vertically beneath the top member, approximately perpendicular to the long axis of the support frame 201 when the device is mounted on the wall, as discussed below.
Depending on the size and the scope of the project and the lengths of the individual rail assemblies, it is often necessary to concatenate a plurality of rail assemblies end to end. In this way multiple rail assemblies are interconnected to produce a rigid rail member that extends downward a desired distance from the top of the structure. The term “rail member” is used herein to refer to a linear arrangement of one or more rail assemblies. Where only one rail assembly is required for a job, the rail member comprises just that assembly.
If, for instance, it is necessary to cut an opening in a wall that is 100 feet high, and the required opening is to be 10 feet high and have an upper edge 20 feet below the upper edge of the wall, then the desired length of the rail members will be on the order of at least 30 feet, requiring, for example, two 15-foot rail assemblies connected to form each rail member. The point is to provide two sufficiently long rail members connected to the top member, reaching at least to the bottom of the work-face and lying in a plane approximately parallel to the structural surface.
Of course, not all structural surfaces are perfectly vertical and some, such as reactor walls, may be curved; consequently, in some instances one or both rail assemblies may not lie precisely in a plane that is parallel to the structural surface. In the case of curved surfaces, it is possible to provide a support frame and/or carriage having complimentary curvatures to the wall in order to maintain the rail assemblies a proper and consistent distance from the surface.
In summary, the component-groups of the rigid support structure of this preferred embodiment include 1) the top member 200 with its support frame 201 and stub-legs 102, and 2) the attached rail members 501/502 that are made up of one or more rail assemblies. This support structure supports a movable carriage such as the one shown in perspective in
The carriage 600 may be a generally rectangular frame 601 that is connected to the vertical rail members. A driver drives the carriage up and down the rails. The function of the carriage is to carry nozzles that direct jets of high pressure fluid against the surface of the structure. The nozzles may be directly connected to the carriage; however, in the preferred embodiment the nozzles are connected to a nozzle carrier 606, which is attached to the carriage 600. The nozzle carrier with its respective nozzles and mechanism(s) for moving the nozzles, whether or not they are arranged as cannon, is conveniently referred to as a “nozzle assembly.” One or more nozzles together with the nozzle carrier may form a collective structure referred to herein as a “water cannon” or simply “cannon.” A pair of water cannon 602 is shown in
With reference to
Drivers for moving the nozzles, or cannon in the present embodiment, orthogonally with respect to the longitudinal axis of the carriage are provided. For instance, nozzle carriers 606 are carried to and fro on tracks 605 by trolleys 610. The tracks are oriented substantially orthogonally to the longitudinal axis of the carriage and also substantially orthogonally to the surface of the wall. The nozzle carriers move rectilinearly along the tracks, toward and away from the wall, thereby moving the cannon closer to and farther from the work-face. In the perspective drawing of
The nozzle assembly is also movable back and forth along the length of the carriage. When there are more than one such nozzle assemblies, as shown in
Referring to
Thus, the nozzles can move toward and away from the wall along the tracks 605, they can move to and fro across the structural surface by moving along the carriage, and the can also swing 90° about a swing axis that is substantially orthogonal to the structural surface.
The carriage may be attached to the rigid support frame before or after the frame is mounted above the work-face. The carriage is positioned at the appropriate height of the wall by moving it up and down the rail members with the vertical driver. Cannon 602 move back and forth along the length of the carriage and are put into position adjacent the point at which the hydro-demolition is to begin. The cannon are moved toward or away from the wall until they are a desired distance from the wall to begin operation. High pressure fluid is applied to the nozzles, which produce jets of the fluid directed at the work-face. The cannon move back and forth across the wall by being driven to and fro along the carriage, thereby cutting a swath of the wall. As the surface is eroded, the cannon are moved toward the wall, cutting the swath deeper and deeper into the growing opening. When the final or a desired intermediate depth is reached for that swath, the cannon are backed out, the height of the carriage is again adjusted, and the process is repeated. If the invention is supported by a movable car at the top of the wall as described above, the entire apparatus shown in
It is to be emphasized that the vertical movements of the carriage, the movements of the cannon along the length of the carriage, the movement of the cannon toward and away from the work-face, and the high-pressure fluid in our preferred embodiment are all controlled remotely by means of remote control devices known in the art. Consequently, a worker does not ride on the carriage during the cutting operation and need not be put in the path of flying debris and fluid. Once the apparatus is in place, the hydro-demolition operation can be completely controlled from a safe distance by means of a remote console.
The invention has been described here with respect to a particular, preferred embodiment. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the scope of the invention obviously extends beyond this particular embodiment. While the component elements of the invention are well known, it is the novel and non-obvious arrangement of those elements that results in the unexpected features, functions, uses, and advantages of the invention.
Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §119, we claim priority benefits of U.S. provisional patent application 61/301,135 filed by Gerard J MacNeil et al. on Feb. 3, 2010.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3809318 | Yamamoto | May 1974 | A |
3857516 | Taylor | Dec 1974 | A |
4045086 | Parkes | Aug 1977 | A |
4074792 | Zaugg et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4074858 | Burns | Feb 1978 | A |
4081200 | Cheung | Mar 1978 | A |
4111490 | Liesveld | Sep 1978 | A |
4436694 | Vassalotti et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4470952 | Vassalotti | Sep 1984 | A |
4646769 | O'Brien | Mar 1987 | A |
4795217 | Hilaris | Jan 1989 | A |
4813313 | Ichikawa | Mar 1989 | A |
4854770 | Puchala | Aug 1989 | A |
5010694 | Agbede | Apr 1991 | A |
5020183 | Grant | Jun 1991 | A |
5022927 | Seidel | Jun 1991 | A |
5255959 | Logeal | Oct 1993 | A |
5765924 | Liesveld | Jun 1998 | A |
6050277 | Purton | Apr 2000 | A |
6179519 | Hilmersson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6877930 | Stromdahl | Apr 2005 | B2 |
20010000003 | Cope | Mar 2001 | A1 |
20050077775 | Nakakuro | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060087168 | MacNeil | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20080041015 | MacNeil | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20100140444 | MacNeil | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100206333 | MacNeil | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
25 26 323 | Dec 1976 | DE |
2005024191 | Jan 2005 | JP |
WO 2006045198 | May 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110185867 A1 | Aug 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61301135 | Feb 2010 | US |