Field of the Invention
Embodiments of the present invention generally relate to a method and apparatus for measuring torque in a top drive system.
Description of the Related Art
A wellbore is formed to access hydrocarbon-bearing formations (e.g., crude oil and/or natural gas) or for geothermal power generation by the use of drilling. Drilling is accomplished by utilizing a drill bit that is mounted on the end of a drill string. To drill within the wellbore to a predetermined depth, the drill string is often rotated by a top drive on a surface rig. After drilling to a predetermined depth, the drill string and drill bit are removed and a section of casing is lowered into the wellbore. An annulus is thus formed between the string of casing and the formation. The casing string is hung from the wellhead. A cementing operation is then conducted in order to fill the annulus with cement. The casing string is cemented into the wellbore by circulating cement into the annulus defined between the outer wall of the casing and the borehole. The combination of cement and casing strengthens the wellbore and facilitates the isolation of certain areas of the formation behind the casing for the production of hydrocarbons.
Top drives are equipped with a motor for rotating the drill string. The quill of the top drive is typically threaded for connection to an upper end of the drill pipe in order to transmit torque to the drill string. It is important to accurately measure the torque transmitted by the top drive to ensure proper engagement between the quill of the top drive and the drill string. Furthermore, the torque must be accurately measured to prevent overloading the drill string, drill head, and/or drill bit.
Therefore, there is a need for an apparatus and method for accurately measuring the torque provided by the top drive system.
In one embodiment, a top drive system for use with a tool for handling tubulars on a drilling rig includes a motor unit; a coupling unit that transfers torque to the tool; a torque measurement device (TMD) coupled to at least one of the motor unit, the tool, or the coupling unit, wherein the TMD includes a sensing member coupled to an evaluation unit, wherein the sensing member is configured to measure a magnetostrictive effect and the evaluation unit is configured to calculate a magnitude of the torque reaction force based on the magnetostrictive effect.
So that the manner in which the above recited features of the present invention can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.
The motor unit 100 is connected to a tool 102, as shown in
In one embodiment, the motor unit 100 is attached to a coupling unit. The coupling unit transfers torque and load from the motor unit 100 to the tool 102. The coupling unit may include a drive gear 108 and a thread compensator 112. The drive gear 108 includes a bore therethrough and comprises an inner coupling mechanism that can connect one of several tools 102, such as a drilling tool exemplarily shown in
The rail bracket 110 includes upper bridges 122a and 122b, lower bridges 124a and 124b, and a trolley 120 configured to counteract torque applied to the tool 102. The drive body 106 is coupled to the rail bracket 110, as shown in
Referring again to
The motor unit 100 includes at least one torque measurement device for measuring a torque exerted on the motor unit 100. The torque measurement device may be disposed at any appropriate location on the motor unit 100 to increase accuracy and response time and decrease the influence of a weight load on the tool 102.
In one embodiment, the motor unit 100 includes a torque measurement device (TMD) 200 on the rail bracket 110, as shown in
In one embodiment, the sensing member 304 includes at least one inverse magnetostrictive sensor. At least a portion of the tool 102 includes ferromagnetic material. For example, the tool includes magnetized areas 310a and 310b. As shown, the magnetized areas 310a,b are disposed on the neck 102n of the tool 102. The magnetized areas 310a,b are axially aligned with a corresponding number of sensors in the sensing member 304, such as inverse magnetostrictive sensors 312a and 312b. As shown, the magnetized areas 310a,b and the sensors 312a,b are laterally spaced apart. When the tool 102 is subject to torque, a strain on an outer surface of the tool 102 changes the dimensions of the magnetized areas 310a,b, thereby changing a magnetic field between the magnetized areas 310a,b and the sensors 312a,b. The inverse magnetostrictive sensors 312a,b are configured to measure the magnetic field changes in real time. Thereafter, the sensing member 304 transmits the magnetic field measurements to the evaluation unit 302 via the cable 306. The evaluation unit 302 calculates the magnitude of torque exerted on the magnetized areas 310a,b of the tool 102 based on the change in the magnetic field measured by the sensors 312a,b.
In another embodiment, the sensing member 304 includes an anisotropic magnetostrictive sensor. In this embodiment, the sensing member 304 is axially aligned with a magnetized area, such as area 310a or 310b. In operation, torque exerted on the tool 102 may cause a compressive stress and/or tensile stress on the magnetized area. The permeability for magnetization in a direction of compressive stress is different in comparison to magnetization in a direction of tensile stress. The anisotropic magnetostrictive sensor in the sensing member 304 is configured to measure the difference in permeability and transmit the measurements to the evaluation unit 302 via the cable 306. Thereafter, the evaluation unit 302 calculates the magnitude of torque exerted on the magnetized area of the tool 102 based on the difference in permeability.
As shown in
The evaluation unit 402 is also coupled to an optical transmitter/receiver 404 via a cable 406. Alternatively, the evaluation unit 402 may communicate with the optical transmitter/receiver 404 wirelessly. Alternatively, a separate optical transmitter and receiver are provided. The optical transmitter/receiver 404 is coupled to an upper grid plate 412 via a first optical fiber cable 414 and a lower grid plate 416 via a second optical fiber cable 418. The upper and lower grid plates 412, 416 may be disposed on the neck 102 and/or the torso 102r of the tool 102. The optical transmitter/receiver 404 is configured to transmit light onto each of the upper and lower grid plates 412, 416 via respective first and second optical fiber cables 414, 418. The light is transmitted back to the optical transmitter/receiver 404 via the same or additional respective fiber cables 412, 416. Under zero torque conditions, the light transmissions from the upper and lower grid plates 412, 416 are in phase with each other. When torque is applied to the tool 102, the reflected light from the upper and lower grid plates 412, 416 is modulated. Phase change measurements are received by the optical transmitter/receiver 404 and transmitted to the evaluation unit 402, where the magnitude of torque exerted on the tool 102 is calculated based on the phase difference.
The evaluation unit 502 is also coupled to a sensing member 504 via cable 506. Alternatively, the evaluation unit 502 may communicate with the sensing member 504 wirelessly. In one embodiment, the sensing member 504 includes a surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensor. In one embodiment, the SAW sensor includes a piezoelectric substrate having an input transducer separated by a distance from an output transducer. A surface wave propagates between the input and output transducers on the piezoelectric substrate. Under zero torque conditions, the surface wave has a phase associated with a zero torque applied to the tool 102. When torque is applied to the tool 102, the distance between the input and output transducers changes and the surface wave exhibits a phase different from the zero torque phase. The phase measurements are transmitted from the sensing member 504 to the evaluation unit 502, where the magnitude of the torque exerted on the tool 102 is calculated based on the phase difference. In another embodiment, the SAW sensor is used as a resonant element. For example, the SAW sensor includes the piezoelectric substrate having spaced apart interdigital electrodes. When zero torque is applied to the tool 102, a surface wave with a baseline resonant frequency propagates on the substrate between the electrodes. When torque is applied to the tool 102, the spacing between the electrodes changes, thereby changing the resonant frequency of the surface wave between the electrodes. If used as an amplifier feedback, the resonant frequency and the distance between the electrodes can be measured and evaluated.
In another embodiment, the sensing member 504 includes strain/compression load cells as described herein. The load cells may be appropriately positioned on the neck 102n and/or the torso 102r in order to accurately measure the torque and/or load exerted on the tool 102. The load cells may be connected to the evaluation unit 502 for interpreting gathered measurements. For example, when torque and/or load is exerted on the tool 102, the strain changes an electrical resistance of the load cells in proportion to the torque and/or load. The change in electrical resistance of the load cell is transmitted to the evaluation unit 502, where the torque and/or load exerted on the tool 102 is calculated based on the change in electrical resistance.
In one embodiment, the motor unit 600 is attached to a coupling unit. The coupling unit transfers torque and load from the motor unit 600 to the tool 602. The coupling unit may be at least partially disposed in the lower tubular portion of the drive body 606. The coupling unit may include a shaft 609, a housing 611, and a thread compensator 612. The shaft 609 may include a neck 609n. The shaft 609 may have couplings, such as threaded couplings, formed at a lower longitudinal end thereof on an outer surface of the shaft 609 that can connect to the housing 611 and on an inner surface of the shaft 609 that can connect one of several tools 602, such as a drilling tool exemplarily shown in
The tool 602 may include a head 602h and a torso 602r. In one embodiment, the compensator 612 includes a lock ring 613 having retractable lock pins, which when extended, are configured to engage respective slots formed in the head 602h of the tool 602, thereby connecting the lock ring 613 to the tool 602 and allowing a lift up via the compensator 612. Alternatively, a rotating latch ring may connect the lock ring 613 to the tool 602. The head 602h rests on the shoulder 611s of the housing, transferring the load of the tool 602 to the drive gear 608 through the shaft 609 via the compensator 612 and housing 611. The housing 611 may include a locking profile on an inner surface thereof for engagement with a respective profile on the tool head 602h. As a result, torque may be transferred from the drive gear 608 to the tool 602 via the couplings between the shaft 609 and the housing 611 and via the profiles in the housing 611 and the head 602h. As a result, the tool 602 is longitudinally and torsionally connected to the drive gear 608, thereby forming a top drive.
The motor unit 600 includes at least one torque measurement device for measuring a torque exerted on the motor unit 600. The torque measurement device may be disposed at any appropriate location on the motor unit 600 to increase accuracy and response time and decrease the influence of a weight load on the tool 602.
In one embodiment, the motor unit 600 includes the torque measurement device (TMD) 200, as shown in
In one embodiment, the motor unit 600 includes a torque measurement device (TMD) 700, as shown in
In one embodiment, the sensing member 704 includes at least one inverse magnetostrictive sensor. At least a portion of the tool 602 includes ferromagnetic material. For example, the tool includes magnetized areas 710a and 710b. As shown, the magnetized areas 710a,b are disposed on the neck 609n of the shaft 609. The magnetized areas 710a,b are axially aligned with a corresponding number of sensors in the sensing member 704, such as inverse magnetostrictive sensors 712a and 712b. As shown, the magnetized areas 710a,b and the sensors 712a,b are laterally spaced apart. When the shaft 609 is subject to torque, a strain on an outer surface of the shaft 609 changes the dimensions of the magnetized areas 710a,b thereby changing a magnetic field between the magnetized areas 710a,b and the sensors 712a,b. The inverse magnetostrictive sensors 712a,b are configured to measure the magnetic field changes in real time. Thereafter, the sensing member 704 transmits the magnetic field measurements to the evaluation unit 702 via the cable 706. The evaluation unit 702 calculates the magnitude of the torque exerted on the magnetized areas 710a,b of the shaft 609 based on the change in the magnetic field measured by the sensors 712a,b.
In another embodiment, the sensing member 704 includes an anisotropic magnetostrictive sensor. In this embodiment, the sensing member 704 is axially aligned with a magnetized area, such as area 710a or 710b. In operation, torque exerted on the shaft 609 may cause a compressive stress and/or tensile stress on the magnetized area. The permeability for magnetization in a direction of compressive stress is different in comparison to magnetization in a direction of tensile stress. The anisotropic magnetostrictive sensor in the sensing member 704 is configured to measure the difference in permeability and transmit the measurements to the evaluation unit 702 via the cable 706. Thereafter, the evaluation unit 702 calculates the magnitude of torque exerted on the magnetized area of the shaft 609 based on the difference in permeability.
The evaluation unit 802 is also coupled to an optical transmitter/receiver 804 via a cable 806. Alternatively, the evaluation unit 802 may communicate with the optical transmitter/receiver 804 wirelessly. Alternatively, a separate optical transmitter and receiver are provided. The optical transmitter/receiver 804 is coupled to an upper grid plate 812 via a first optical fiber cable 814 and a lower grid plate 816 via a second optical fiber cable 818. The upper and lower grid plates 812, 816 may be disposed on the neck 609n of the shaft 609 and/or the torso 602r of the tool 602. The optical transmitter/receiver 804 is configured to transmit light onto each of the upper and lower grid plates 812, 816 via respective first and second optical fiber cables 814, 818. The light is transmitted back to the optical transmitter/receiver 804 via the same or additional respective fiber cables 812, 816. Under zero torque conditions, the light transmissions from the upper and lower grid plates 812, 816 are in phase with each other. When torque is applied to the shaft 609 and tool 602, the reflected light from the upper and lower grid plates 812, 816 is modulated. Phase change measurements are received by the optical transmitter/receiver 804 and transmitted to the evaluation unit 802, where the magnitude of torque exerted on the shaft 609 and/or tool 602 is calculated based on the phase difference.
The evaluation unit 902 is also coupled to a sensing member 904 via cable 906. Alternatively, the evaluation unit 902 may communicate with the sensing member 904 wirelessly. In one embodiment, the sensing member 904 includes a surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensor. In one embodiment, the SAW sensor includes a piezoelectric substrate having an input transducer separated by a distance from an output transducer. A surface wave propagates between the input and output transducers on the piezoelectric substrate. Under zero torque conditions, the surface wave has a phase associated with a zero torque applied to the shaft 609 and tool 602. When torque is applied to the shaft 609 and tool 602, the distance between the input and output transducers changes and the surface wave exhibits a phase different from the zero torque phase. The phase measurements are transmitted from the sensing member 904 to the evaluation unit 902, where the magnitude of the torque exerted on the shaft 609 and/or the tool 602 is calculated based on the phase difference. In another embodiment, the SAW sensor is used as a resonant element. For example, the SAW sensor includes the piezoelectric substrate having spaced apart interdigital electrodes. When zero torque is applied to the shaft 609 and the tool 602, a surface wave with a baseline resonant frequency propagates on the substrate between the electrodes. When torque is applied to the shaft 609 and the tool 602, the spacing between the electrodes changes, thereby changing the resonant frequency of the surface wave between the electrodes. If used as an amplifier feedback, the resonant frequency and the distance between the electrodes can be measured and evaluated.
In another embodiment, the sensing member 904 includes strain/compression load cells as described herein. The load cells may be appropriately positioned on the shaft 609 and/or the torso 602r in order to accurately measure the torque exerted on the shaft 609 and/or the tool 602. The load cells may be connected to the evaluation unit 902 for interpreting gathered measurements. For example, when torque is exerted on the shaft 609 and the tool 602, the strain changes an electrical resistance of the load cells in proportion to the torque. The change in electrical resistance of the load cell is transmitted to the evaluation unit 902, where the torque exerted on the shaft 609 and/or the tool 602 is calculated based on the change in electrical resistance.
The load transfer assembly 1000 may include two links 1030, two bell cranks 1032, and a torque bar 1034. The links 1030a,b are coupled between the support legs 1024 and the bell cranks 1032. Each link 1030a,b is coupled to the corresponding support leg 1024 by a pivot connection 1038. The two bell cranks 1032 are joined together through the torque bar 1034. In one embodiment, the bell cranks 1032 may be fixedly coupled to the torque bar 1034 at opposite ends of the torque bar 1034. The bell cranks 1032 are further coupled to the frame 1008 of the power tong 1002 by pivot connections 1040.
In one embodiment, the tong assembly includes a torque measurement device (TMD) 1100 on the load transfer assembly 1000. For example, a respective TMD 1100 is disposed on at least one of the links 1030a,b. In one embodiment, at least one TMD 1100 is disposed on each link 1030a,b. In this embodiment, the TMDs are mounted on the links 1030a,b to enhance measurement accuracy and compensation. Each TMD 1100 may be disposed on an outer-facing surface or an inner-facing surface of each respective link 1030a,b. The TMD 1100 includes any appropriate sensor for measuring torque. For example, the TMD 1100 includes sensing members, such as any appropriate load cell for measuring strain and compression. The load cells may be appropriately positioned on the links 1030a,b to measure the torque exerted on the tong assembly. The TMD 1100 may be connected to an evaluation unit, such as a processor, for interpreting torque measurements. For example, when torque is exerted on the tong assembly, the torque changes an electrical resistance of the load cells in proportion to the torque. The change in electrical resistance of the load cell is transmitted to the evaluation unit, where the change is calibrated to correspond to a torque exerted on the tubular.
Each of the evaluation units described herein may be linked to a data network, monitoring, or control system for receiving the processed torque magnitude. The embodiments described herein may be included in the motor units 100, 600 in any combination to provide multiple torque measurements. For example, the TMD may be appropriately disposed on the drive body 106, 606, drive gear 108, 608, and/or the tool 102, 602 to measure the torque exerted on the tool 102, 602. Furthermore, multiple embodiments of the TMD may be combined to provide multiple measurements of torque for increased accuracy.
While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.
In one embodiment, a top drive system for use with a tool for handling tubulars on a drilling rig includes a motor unit; a coupling unit that transfers torque to the tool; a torque measurement device (TMD) coupled to at least one of the motor unit, the tool, or the coupling unit, wherein the TMD includes a sensing member coupled to an evaluation unit, wherein the sensing member is configured to measure a magnetostrictive effect and the evaluation unit is configured to calculate a magnitude of the torque reaction force based on the magnetostrictive effect.
In one or more of the embodiments described herein, the motor unit includes a drive body, a drive motor, and a drive ring torsionally connected to a rotor of the drive motor and the motor unit selectively connects to the tool via at least one of a latch profile, a load shoulder, a threaded connection, and friction.
In one or more of the embodiments described herein, the coupling unit is configured to support a tubular and the tool is configured to generate the torque reaction force when the tubular is rotated.
In one or more of the embodiments described herein, the sensing member includes an anisotropic magnetostrictive sensor.
In one or more of the embodiments described herein, the sensing member includes an inverse magnetostrictive sensor.
In one or more of the embodiments described herein, the sensing member is axially aligned with a magnetized area on the tool.
In one or more of the embodiments described herein, the TMD is coupled to a drive gear in the motor unit.
In one or more of the embodiments described herein, the TMD is coupled to a drive body in the motor unit.
In one or more of the embodiments described herein, the TMD is coupled to the motor unit.
In one or more of the embodiments described herein, the TMD is coupled to the coupling unit.
In another embodiment, a top drive system for use with a tool for handling tubulars on a drilling rig includes a motor unit; a coupling unit that transfers torque to the tool and a torque measurement device (TMD) coupled to at least one of the motor unit or the tool, wherein the TMD includes: an optical transmitter, an optical receiver configured to receive an optical signal from the transmitter, an evaluation unit coupled to the receiver, wherein the evaluation unit is configured to calculate a magnitude of the torque reaction force based on the optical signal.
In one or more of the embodiments described herein, the motor unit includes a drive body, a drive motor, and a drive ring torsionally connected to a rotor of the drive motor and the motor unit selectively connects to the tool via at least one of a latch profile, a load shoulder, a threaded connection, and friction.
In one or more of the embodiments described herein, the coupling unit is configured to support a tubular and the tool is configured to generate the torque reaction force when the tubular is rotated.
In one or more of the embodiments described herein, the tool includes a grid plate configured to reflect the optical signal from the transmitter.
In one or more of the embodiments described herein, wherein the tool includes the TMD.
In another embodiment, a top drive system for use with a tool for handling tubulars on a drilling rig includes a motor unit; a coupling unit that transfers torque to the tool and a torque measurement device (TMD) coupled to at least one of the motor unit or the tool, wherein the TMD includes: a sensing member coupled to an evaluation unit, wherein the sensing member is configured to measure a phasing of an RF signal and the evaluation unit is configured to calculate a magnitude of the torque reaction force based on the shift of the phasing of the RF signal.
In one or more of the embodiments described herein, the motor unit includes a drive body, a drive motor, and a drive ring torsionally connected to a rotor of the drive motor and the motor unit selectively connects to the tool via at least one of a latch profile, a load shoulder, a threaded connection, and friction.
In one or more of the embodiments described herein, the motor unit includes a device configured to provide power to the evaluation unit by induction.
In one or more of the embodiments described herein, power and data transmission between a device configured to provide power to the evaluation unit is performed via cables through a swivel.
In one or more of the embodiments described herein, power and data transmission between a device configured to provide power to the evaluation unit is generated at the tool or stored for use in a battery or an electrical accumulator.
In one or more of the embodiments described herein, wherein the tool includes the TMD.
In another embodiment, a method of calculating torque for a top drive system includes applying a torque to a tool using a coupling unit, measuring a magnetostrictive effect using a sensing member, transmitting the measured magnetostrictive effect to an evaluation unit, and calculating the torque based on the measured magnetostrictive effect.
In another embodiment, a method of calculating torque for a top drive system includes applying a torque to a tool using a coupling unit, measuring an optical signal using a sensing member, transmitting the measured optical signal to an evaluation unit, and calculating the torque based on the measured optical signal.
In another embodiment, method of calculating torque for a top drive system includes, applying a torque to a tool using a coupling unit, measuring a phasing of an RF signal using a sensing member, transmitting the measured phasing of the RF signal to an evaluation unit, and calculating the torque based on the measured phasing of the RF signal.
In another embodiment, a method of calculating torque for a top drive system including applying a torque to a tool using a coupling unit, measuring a change in electrical resistance using a sensing member, transmitting the measured change in electrical resistance to an evaluation unit, and calculating the torque based on the measured change in electrical resistance.
In another embodiment, a top drive system for use with a tool for handling tubulars on a drilling rig includes a motor unit, wherein the motor unit includes a drive body, a drive motor, and a drive ring torsionally connected to a rotor of the drive motor and the motor unit selectively connects to the tool via at least one of a latch profile, a load shoulder, a threaded connection, and friction, wherein the tool is configured to generate a torque reaction force; and a bracket coupled to the motor unit, wherein the bracket includes at least one sensing member configured to measure a change in electrical resistance and the evaluation unit is configured to calculate a magnitude of the torque reaction force based on the change in electrical resistance.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1367156 | McAlvay et al. | Feb 1921 | A |
1610977 | Scott | Dec 1926 | A |
1822444 | MacClatchie | Sep 1931 | A |
2370354 | Hurst | Feb 1945 | A |
3147992 | Haeber et al. | Sep 1964 | A |
3354951 | Savage et al. | Nov 1967 | A |
3385370 | Knox et al. | May 1968 | A |
3662842 | Bromell | May 1972 | A |
3698426 | Litchfield et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3747675 | Brown | Jul 1973 | A |
3766991 | Brown | Oct 1973 | A |
3774697 | Brown | Nov 1973 | A |
3776320 | Brown | Dec 1973 | A |
3842619 | Bychurch, Sr. | Oct 1974 | A |
3888318 | Brown | Jun 1975 | A |
3899024 | Tonnelli et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3913687 | Gyongyosi et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3915244 | Brown | Oct 1975 | A |
3964552 | Slator | Jun 1976 | A |
4022284 | Crow | May 1977 | A |
4051587 | Boyadjieff | Oct 1977 | A |
4100968 | Delano | Jul 1978 | A |
4192155 | Gray | Mar 1980 | A |
4199847 | Owens | Apr 1980 | A |
4235469 | Denny et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4364407 | Hilliard | Dec 1982 | A |
4377179 | Giebeler | Mar 1983 | A |
4402239 | Mooney | Sep 1983 | A |
4449596 | Boyadjieff | May 1984 | A |
4478244 | Garrett | Oct 1984 | A |
4497224 | Jürgens | Feb 1985 | A |
4593773 | Skeie | Jun 1986 | A |
4762187 | Haney | Aug 1988 | A |
4776617 | Sato | Oct 1988 | A |
4779688 | Baugh | Oct 1988 | A |
4791997 | Krasnov | Dec 1988 | A |
4813493 | Shaw et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4815546 | Haney et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4821814 | Willis et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4844181 | Bassinger | Jul 1989 | A |
4867236 | Haney et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4955949 | Bailey et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4962819 | Bailey et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4972741 | Sibille | Nov 1990 | A |
4981180 | Price | Jan 1991 | A |
4997042 | Jordan et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5036927 | Willis | Aug 1991 | A |
5099725 | Bouligny, Jr. et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5152554 | LaFleur et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5172940 | Usui et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5191939 | Stokley | Mar 1993 | A |
5215153 | Younes | Jun 1993 | A |
5245877 | Ruark | Sep 1993 | A |
5282653 | LaFleur et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5297833 | Willis et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5348351 | LaFleur et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5385514 | Dawe | Jan 1995 | A |
5433279 | Tessari et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5441310 | Barrett et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5456320 | Baker | Oct 1995 | A |
5479988 | Appleton | Jan 1996 | A |
5486223 | Carden | Jan 1996 | A |
5501280 | Brisco | Mar 1996 | A |
5509442 | Claycomb | Apr 1996 | A |
5577566 | Albright et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5584343 | Coone | Dec 1996 | A |
5645131 | Trevisani | Jul 1997 | A |
5664310 | Penisson | Sep 1997 | A |
5682952 | Stokley | Nov 1997 | A |
5735348 | Hawkins, III | Apr 1998 | A |
5778742 | Stuart | Jul 1998 | A |
5839330 | Stokka | Nov 1998 | A |
5909768 | Castille et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5918673 | Hawkins et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5950724 | Giebeler | Sep 1999 | A |
5971079 | Mullins | Oct 1999 | A |
5992520 | Schultz et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6003412 | Dlask et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6053191 | Hussey | Apr 2000 | A |
6102116 | Giovanni | Aug 2000 | A |
6142545 | Penman et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6161617 | Gjedebo | Dec 2000 | A |
6173777 | Mullins | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6276450 | Seneviratne | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279654 | Mosing et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289911 | Majkovic | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6309002 | Bouligny | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311792 | Scott et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328343 | Rosie et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6378630 | Ritorto et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6390190 | Mullins | May 2002 | B2 |
6401811 | Coone | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415862 | Mullins | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6431626 | Bouligny | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443241 | Juhasz et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460620 | LaFleur | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6527047 | Pietras | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6536520 | Snider et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6571876 | Szarka | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6578632 | Mullins | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6595288 | Mosing et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6604578 | Mullins | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6622796 | Pietras | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6637526 | Juhasz et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6640824 | Majkovic | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6666273 | Laurel | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6675889 | Mullins et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6679333 | York et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6688398 | Pietras | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6691801 | Juhasz et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6705405 | Pietras | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6715542 | Mullins | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6719046 | Mullins | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6722425 | Mullins | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6725938 | Pietras | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732819 | Wenzel | May 2004 | B2 |
6732822 | Slack et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6742584 | Appleton | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6742596 | Haugen | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6779599 | Mullins et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6832656 | Fournier, Jr. et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6883605 | Arceneaux et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6892835 | Shahin et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6908121 | Hirth et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6925807 | Jones et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6938697 | Haugen | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6976298 | Pietras | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6994176 | Shahin et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7000503 | Dagenais et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7001065 | Dishaw et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7004259 | Pietras | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7007753 | Robichaux et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7017671 | Williford | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7021374 | Pietras | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7025130 | Bailey et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7073598 | Haugen | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7090021 | Pietras | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7096948 | Mosing et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7114235 | Jansch et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7128161 | Pietras | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7137454 | Pietras | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7140443 | Beierbach et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7143849 | Shahin et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7147254 | Niven et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7159654 | Ellison et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7178612 | Belik | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7213656 | Pietras | May 2007 | B2 |
7219744 | Pietras | May 2007 | B2 |
7231969 | Folk et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7270189 | Brown et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7281451 | Beckinghausen | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7281587 | Haugen | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7303022 | Tilton et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7325610 | Giroux et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7353880 | Pietras | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7448456 | Shahin et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7451826 | Pietras | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7490677 | Buytaert et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7503397 | Giroux et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7509722 | Shahin et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7513300 | Pietras et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7591304 | Juhasz et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7617866 | Pietras | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7635026 | Mosing et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7665515 | Mullins | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7665530 | Wells et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7665531 | Pietras | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7669662 | Pietras | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7690422 | Swietlik et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7694730 | Angman | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7694744 | Shahin | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7699121 | Juhasz et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7712523 | Snider et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7730698 | Montano et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7757759 | Jahn et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7779922 | Harris et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7793719 | Snider et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7817062 | Li et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7828085 | Kuttel et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7841415 | Winter | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7854265 | Zimmermann | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7866390 | Latiolais, Jr. et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7874352 | Odell, II et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7874361 | Mosing et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7878237 | Angman | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7878254 | Abdollahi et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7882902 | Boutwell, Jr. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7896084 | Haugen | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7918273 | Snider et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7958787 | Hunter | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7971637 | Duhon et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7975768 | Fraser et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8118106 | Wiens et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8141642 | Olstad et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8210268 | Heidecke et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8281856 | Jahn et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8307903 | Redlinger et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8365834 | Liess et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8459361 | Leuchtenberg | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8505984 | Henderson et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8567512 | Odell, II et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8601910 | Begnaud | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8636067 | Robichaux et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8651175 | Fallen | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8668003 | Osmundsen et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8708055 | Liess et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8727021 | Heidecke et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8776898 | Liess et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8783339 | Sinclair et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8839884 | Kuttel et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8893772 | Henderson et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9068406 | Clasen et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9206851 | Slaughter, Jr. et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9528326 | Heidecke et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9631438 | McKay | Apr 2017 | B2 |
20020043403 | Juhasz et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020074132 | Juhasz et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020084069 | Mosing et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020129934 | Mullins et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020170720 | Haugen | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030098150 | Andreychuk | May 2003 | A1 |
20030107260 | Ording et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030221519 | Haugen | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003490 | Shahin et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040069497 | Jones et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040216924 | Pietras et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050000691 | Giroux et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050173154 | Lesko | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050206163 | Guesnon et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050257933 | Pietras | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050269072 | Folk et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050269104 | Folk et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050269105 | Pietras | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050274508 | Folk | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060037784 | Walter et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060124353 | Juhasz et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060151181 | Shahin | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060180315 | Shahin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070030167 | Li et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070044973 | Fraser et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070074588 | Harata | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070074874 | Richardson | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070102992 | Jager | May 2007 | A1 |
20070131416 | Odell, II et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070140801 | Kuttel et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070144730 | Shahin et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070158076 | Hollingsworth, Jr. et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070251699 | Wells et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070251701 | Jahn et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070257811 | Hall et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080059073 | Giroux et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080093127 | Angman | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080099196 | Latiolais et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125876 | Boutwell | May 2008 | A1 |
20080202812 | Childers et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080308281 | Boutwell, Jr. et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090151934 | Heidecke et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090159294 | Abdollahi et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090200038 | Swietlik et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090205820 | Koederitz et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090205827 | Swietlik et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090205836 | Swietlik et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090205837 | Swietlik et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090229837 | Wiens et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090266532 | Revheim et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090272537 | Alikin et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090274544 | Liess | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090274545 | Liess et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090316528 | Ramshaw et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090321086 | Zimmermann | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100032162 | Olstad et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100101805 | Angelle et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100200222 | Robichaux et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100206583 | Swietlik et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100206584 | Clubb et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100236777 | Partouche et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110036586 | Hart et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110039086 | Graham et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110088495 | Buck et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110214919 | McClung, III | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110280104 | McClung, III | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120048574 | Wiens et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120152530 | Wiedecke et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120160517 | Bouligny et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120212326 | Christiansen et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120234107 | Pindiprolu et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120298376 | Twardowski | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130055858 | Richardson | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130056977 | Henderson et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130062074 | Angelle et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130075077 | Henderson et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130075106 | Tran et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130105178 | Pietras | May 2013 | A1 |
20130207382 | Robichaux | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130207388 | Jansson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130233624 | In | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130269926 | Liess et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130271576 | Elllis | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130275100 | Ellis et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130299247 | Küttel et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140090856 | Pratt et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140116686 | Odell, II et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140131052 | Richardson | May 2014 | A1 |
20140202767 | Feasey | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140233804 | Gustavsson et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140262521 | Bradley et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140305662 | Giroux et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140326468 | Heidecke et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140352944 | Devarajan et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140360780 | Moss et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150014063 | Simanjuntak et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150053424 | Wiens et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150083391 | Bangert et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150107385 | Mullins et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150337648 | Zippel et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160024862 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160138348 | Kunec | May 2016 | A1 |
20160145954 | Helms et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160177639 | McIntosh et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160215592 | Helms | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160230481 | Misson et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170037683 | Heidecke et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170044854 | Hebebrand et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170044875 | Hebebrand et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170051568 | Wern et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170067303 | Thiemann et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170067320 | Zouhair et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170074075 | Liess | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170211327 | Wern et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170211343 | Thiemann | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170284164 | Holmes et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2012201644 | Apr 2012 | AU |
2013205714 | May 2013 | AU |
2014215938 | Sep 2014 | AU |
2 707 050 | Jun 2009 | CA |
2 841 654 | Aug 2015 | CA |
2 944 327 | Oct 2015 | CA |
102007016822 | Oct 2008 | DE |
0 250 072 | Dec 1987 | EP |
1 619 349 | Jan 2006 | EP |
1772715 | Apr 2007 | EP |
1 961 912 | Aug 2008 | EP |
1 961 913 | Aug 2008 | EP |
2085566 | Aug 2009 | EP |
2 322 357 | May 2011 | EP |
3032025 | Jun 2016 | EP |
1487948 | Oct 1977 | GB |
2 077 812 | Dec 1981 | GB |
2 180 027 | Mar 1987 | GB |
2 228 025 | Aug 1990 | GB |
2 314 391 | Dec 1997 | GB |
2004079153 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2004101417 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2007001887 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007070805 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007127737 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008005767 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2009076648 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2012100019 | Jul 2012 | WO |
2012115717 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2014056092 | Apr 2014 | WO |
2015000023 | Jan 2015 | WO |
2015119509 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2015127433 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2015176121 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2016197255 | Dec 2016 | WO |
2017044384 | Mar 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Streicher Load/Torque Cell System Brochure, Streicher Group, 1 Page. |
Enhanced Torque & Tension Sub With Integrated Turns Brochure, 3PS, Inc.,, 2 Pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 12, 2017, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/047813. |
EPO Partial European Search Report dated Jul. 31, 2018, for European Application No. 18159597.6. |
European Patent Office; Extended Search Report for Application No. 18160808.4; dated Sep. 20, 2018; 8 total pages. |
EPO Partial European Search Report dated Oct. 4, 2018, for European Patent Application No. 18159598.4. |
EPO Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 5, 2018, for European Patent Application No. 18173275.1. |
EPO Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 6, 2018, for European Application No. 18159597.6. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2018/042812 dated Oct. 17, 2018. |
Extended Search Report in application EP18177312.8 dated Nov. 6, 2018. |
A123 System; 14Ah Prismatic Pouch Cell; Nanophosphate® Lithium-Ion; www.a123systems.com; date unknown; 1 page. |
Lefevre, et al.; Drilling Technology; Deeper, more deviated wells push development of smart drill stem rotary shouldered connections; dated 2008; 2 total pages. |
PCT Invitaiton to Pay Additional Fees for International Application No. PCT/US2008/086699; dated Sep. 9, 2009; 7 total pages. |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2008/086699; dated Sep. 11, 2009; 19 total pages. |
National Oilwell Varco; Rotary Shoulder Handbook; dated 2010; 116 total pages. |
Weatherford; TorkSub™ Stand-Alone Torque Measuring System; dated 2011-2014; 4 total pages. |
Australian Examination Report for Application No. 2008334992; dated Apr. 5, 2011; 2 total pages. |
European Search Report for Application No. 08 860 261.0-2315; dated Apr. 12, 2011; 4 total pages. |
Eaton; Spool Valve Hydraulic Motors; dated Sep. 2011; 16 total pages. |
European Extended Search Report for Application No. 12153779.9-2315; dated Apr. 5, 2012; 4 total pages. |
Australian Examination Report for Application No. 2012201644; dated May 15, 2013; 3 total pages. |
Warrior; 250E Electric Top Drive (250-TON); 250H Hydraulic Top Drive (250-TON); dated Apr. 2014; 4 total pages. |
Hydraulic Pumps & Motors; Fundamentals of Hydraulic Motors; dated Jun. 26, 2014; 6 total pages. |
Warrior; Move Pipe Better; 500E Electric Top Drive (500 ton-1000 hp); dated May 2015; 4 total pages. |
Canadian Office Action for Application No. 2,837,581; dated Aug. 24, 2015; 3 total pages. |
European Extended Search Report for Application No. 15166062.8-1610; dated Nov. 23, 2015; 6 total pages. |
Australian Examination Report for Application No. 2014215938; dated Feb. 4, 2016; 3 total pages. |
Rexroth; Bosch Group; Motors and Gearboxes; Asynchronous high-speed motors 1 MB for high speeds; dated Apr. 13, 2016; 6 total pages. |
Canadian Office Action for Application No. 2,837,581; dated Apr. 25, 2016; 3 total pages. |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/061960; dated Jul. 25, 2016; 16 total pages. |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2016/049462; dated Nov. 22, 2016; 14 total pages. |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2016/050542; dated Nov. 25, 2016; 13 total pages. |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2016/046458; dated Dec. 14, 2016; 16 total pages. |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2016/050139; dated Feb. 20, 2017; 20 total pages. |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2017/014646; dated Apr. 4, 2017; 14 total pages. |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2017/014224; dated Jun. 8, 2017; 15 total pages. |
European Extended Search Report for Application No. 17152458.0-1609; dated Jun. 8, 2017; 7 total pages. |
Australian Examination Report for Application No. 2017200371; dated Sep. 19, 2017; 5 total pages. |
European Extended Search Report for Application No. 17195552.9-1614; dated Dec. 4, 2017; 6 total pages. |
Australian Examination Report for Application No. 2017200371; dated Feb. 8, 2018; 6 total pages. |
Canadian Office Action for Application No. 2,955,754; dated Mar. 28, 2018; 3 total pages. |
Australian Examination Report for Application No. 2017200371; dated May 2, 2018; 4 total pages. |
Canadian Office Action for Application No. 2,974,298; dated May 16, 2018; 3 total pages. |
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report for Application No. 18157915.2; dated Jun. 6, 2018; 8 total pages. |
EPO Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 19, 2018, for European Application No. 18159595.0. |
EPO Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 17, 2018, for European Application No. 18158050.7. |
Cookson, Colter, “Inventions Speed Drilling, Cut Costs,” The American Oil & Gas Reporter, Sep. 2015, 2 pages. |
Ennaifer, Amine et al. , “Step Change in Well Testing Operations,” Oilfield Review, Autumn 2014: 26, No. 3, pp. 32-41. |
Balltec Lifting Solutions, LiftLOK™ Brochure, “Highest integrity lifting tools for the harshest environments,” 2 pages. |
Balltec Lifting Solutions, CoilLOK™ Brochure, “Highest integrity hand-held coiled tubing handling tools,” 2 pages. |
Peters; Tool Coupler for Use With a Top Drive; U.S. Appl. No. 15/656,508, filed Jul. 21, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS.). |
Fuehring et al.; Tool Coupler With Rotating Coupling Method for Top Drive; U.S. Appl. No. 15/445,758, filed Feb. 28, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS.). |
Bell; Interchangeable Swivel Combined Multicoupler; U.S. Appl. No. 15/607,159, filed May 26, 2017 (Application not attached to IDS.). |
Amezaga; Dual Torque Transfer for Top Drive System; U.S. Appl. No. 15/447,881, filed Mar. 2, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS.). |
Zouhair; Coupler With Threaded Connection for Pipe Handler; U.S. Appl. No. 15/444,016, filed Feb. 27, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS.). |
Liess; Downhole Tool Coupling System; U.S. Appl. No. 15/670,897, filed Aug. 7, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS.). |
Muller et al; Combined Multi-Coupler With Rotating Locking Method for Top Drive; U.S. Appl. No. 15/721,216, filed Sep. 29, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS.). |
Amezaga et al; Tool Coupler With Threaded Connection for Top Drive; U.S. Appl. No. 15/457,572, filed Mar. 13, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS.). |
Wiens; Combined Multi-Coupler With Locking Clamp Connection for Top Drive; U.S. Appl. No. 15/627,428, filed Jun. 19, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS.). |
Henke et al.; Tool Coupler With Sliding Coupling Members for Top Drive; U.S. Appl. No. 15/448,297, filed Mar. 2, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS.). |
Schoknecht et al.; Combined Multi-Coupler With Rotating Fixations for Top Drive; U.S. Appl. No. 15/447,926, filed Mar. 2, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS.). |
Metzlaff et al.; Combined Multi-Coupler for Top Drive; U.S. Appl. No. 15/627,237, filed Jun. 19, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS.). |
Liess; Combined Multi-Coupler for Top Drive; U.S. Appl. No. 15/656,914, filed Jul. 21, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS.). |
Liess et al.; Combined Multi-Coupler; U.S. Appl. No. 15/656,684, filed Jul. 21, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS). |
Amezaga et al.; Tool Coupler With Data and Signal Transfer Methods for Top Drive; U.S. Appl. No. 15/730,305, filed Oct. 11, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS). |
Liess; Tool Coupler With Threaded Connection for Top Drive; U.S. Appl. No. 15/806,560, filed Nov. 8, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS). |
Peters; Tool Coupler for Use With a Top Drive; U.S. Appl. No. 15/656,508, filed Jul. 21, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS.), U.S. 2019/0027860, published Jan. 27, 2019. |
Fuehring et al.; Tool Coupler with Rotating Coupling Method for Top Drive; U.S. Appl. No. 15/445,758, filed Feb. 28, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS.), U.S. 2018/0245433, published Aug. 30, 2018. |
Bell; Interchangeable Swivel Combined Multicoupler; U.S. Appl. No. 15/607,159, filed May 26, 2017 (Application not attached to IDS.), U.S. 2018/0340398, published Nov. 29, 2018. |
Amezaga; Dual Torque Transfer For Top Drive System; U.S. Appl. No. 15/447,881, filed Mar. 2, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS.), U.S. 2018/0252041, published Sep. 6, 2018. |
Zouhair; Coupler with Threaded Connection for Pipe Handler; U.S. Appl. No. 15/444,016, filed Feb. 27, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS.), U.S. 2018/0245432, published Aug. 30, 2018. |
Liess; Downhole Tool Coupling System; U.S. Appl. No. 15/670,897, filed Aug. 7, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS.), U.S. 2019/0040914, publiished Feb. 7, 2019. |
Muller et al; Combined Multi-Coupler With Rotating Locking Method for Top Drive; U.S. Appl. No. 15/721,216, filed Sep. 29, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS.), U.S. 2019/010970, published Apr. 4, 2019. |
Amezaga et al; Tool Coupler With Threaded Connection for Top Drive; U.S. Appl. No. 15/457,572, filed Mar. 13, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS.), U.S. 2018/0258998, published Sep. 13, 2018. |
Wiens; Combined Multi-Coupler with Locking Clamp Connection for Top Drive; U.S. Appl. No. 15/627,428, filed Jun. 19, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS.), U.S. 2018/0363388, published Dec. 20, 2018. |
Henke et al.; Tool Coupler With Sliding Coupling Members for Top Drive; U.S. Appl. No. 15/448,297, filed Mar. 2, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS.), U.S. 2018/0363388, published Sep. 6, 2018. |
Schoknecht et al.; Combined Multi-Coupler Multi-Rotating Fixations for Top Drive; U.S. Appl. No. 15/447,926, filed Mar. 2, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS.), U.S. 2018/0252269, published Sep. 6, 2018. |
Metzlaff et al; Combined Multi-Coupler for Top Drive; U.S. Appl. No. 15/627,237; filed Jun. 19, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS.), U.S. 2018/0363386, published Dec. 20, 2018. |
Liess; Combined Multi-Coupler for Top Drive; U.S. Appl. No. 15/656,914, filed Jul. 21, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS.), U.S. 2019/0024721, published Jan. 24, 2019. |
Liess et al.; Combined Multi-Coupler; U.S. Appl. No. 15/656,684, filed Jul. 21, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS), U.S. 2018/0258717, published Sep. 13, 2018. |
Amezaga et al.; Tool Coupler With Data and Signal Transfer Methods for Top Drive; U.S. Appl. No. 15/730,305, filed Oct. 11, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS), U.S. 2019/0106977, published Apr. 11, 2019. |
Liess; Tool Coupler with Threaded Connection for Top Drive; U.S. Appl. No. 15/806,560, filed Nov. 8, 2017. (Application not attached to IDS), U.S. 2018/0258999, published Sep. 13, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170051568 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62207779 | Aug 2015 | US |