The invention relates to a top-pan balance having a weighing pan, a weighing system, the load cell of which is connected to fixed points on the housing of the weighing system by an upper connecting rod and a lower connecting rod as a parallel guide so as to be movable in the vertical direction, and an overload safety mechanism. The weighing pan is attached to a pan support for securing against overload, the pan support being connected to the load cell through an auxiliary parallel guide and through a pre-tensioned spring element, whereby, in the permissible weighing range, the weighing pan is rigidly coupled to the load cell, and outside the permissible weighing range, is resiliently coupled to the load cell. At least one limit stop is fixed to the housing and limits the elastic deflection of the weighing pan and the pan support in case of overload.
Balances with overload safety mechanisms of this type are known, for example, from DE 28 30 345 A1 (U.S. Pat. No. 4,273,203). However, the embodiment described there takes up a substantial amount of space, so that the balance housing is made larger due to the overload safety mechanism. The overload safety mechanism also comprises a large number of parts, which makes assembly complex.
A significantly more compact embodiment made from fewer parts is known from DE 101 61 517 B4. This embodiment has proved to be successful.
It is an object of the invention to equip a balance of the aforementioned type with a further capability without necessarily increasing the structural volume of the weighing system.
According to one formulation of the invention, an additional corner load sensor is provided between the pan support and the load cell, the corner load sensor and the overload safety mechanism form a common assembly, wherein the corner load sensor is arranged behind the overload safety mechanism in the force flow direction from the weighing pan to the load cell, and the assembly is attached on the side of the load cell facing the connecting rods and extends into the space between the connecting rods.
Corner load sensors in balances are, in principle, already known. For example, DE 30 03 862 C2 discloses a corner load sensor with strain gauges on a vertical support element directly under the weighing pan. However, this corner load sensor must be dimensioned for the maximum overload that the balance is to withstand without damage. But this does not allow adequate corner load signals to be obtained from the strain gauges. The same applies for the corner load sensor in DE 10 2006 031 950 B3 (US 2009/0114455A1), which can be retrofitted between the weighing pan and the bottom pan of a balance.
In contrast thereto, in the combination according to the invention of corner load sensor and overload safety mechanism in a common assembly, the corner load sensor is arranged behind the overload safety mechanism, so that the corner load sensor is loaded no further than the response threshold of the overload safety mechanism. This means that the thin material sites of the corner load sensor can be made significantly thinner and the strain gauges applied can supply a significantly larger corner load signal.
DE 30 03 862 C2 also discloses—like DE 196 32 709 C1—that corner load sensors with strain gauges at the support sites of the connecting rods of the weighing system that are fixed to the housing detect the horizontal forces where the position of the weighed object is off-center. However, in order for such corner load sensors to be able to deliver a usable signal, the support sites of the connecting rods fixed to the housing must have a certain amount—if only very little—of resilience. However, this leads to a change in the geometry of the parallel guide and thus influences the corner load of the parallel guide. Here also, the problem arises that stable behavior of the parallel guide in the event of corner loading requires that the connecting rods have the most stable possible support points, whereas the desire for a sufficiently large output signal from the corner load sensors requires more resilient support points.
In contrast thereto, the corner load sensor provided, according to one aspect of the invention, together with the overload safety mechanism, between the pan support and the load cell does not influence the parallel guide of the weighing system in any way. The configuration of the parallel guide can be optimized without regard to the corner load sensor; and the corner load sensor can be dimensioned without regard to the parallel guide.
Since the common assembly made from corner load sensor and overload safety mechanism is fastened to the side of the load cell facing the connecting rods and extends into the region between the connecting rods, a particularly space-saving arrangement is produced. In this way, the outer dimensions of the weighing system are not changed by the overload safety mechanism and the corner load sensor.
In the case of weighing systems with a gearing lever, the lever is usually situated in the plane of symmetry of the weighing system. There is therefore only a little space available in the plane of symmetry. Advantageously therefore, the spring element of the overload safety mechanism is divided into two parts arranged on either side of the plane of symmetry. For example, the spring element may consist of two helical springs.
The corner load sensor advantageously consists of at least three vertically arranged thin material sites to which strain gauges are applied. The thin material sites are advantageously arranged in the force flow such that these sites are tension-loaded when the weighed object is placed approximately centrally on the weighing pan. Therefore, even with the weighed object arranged off-center (producing a corner load), the thin material sites experience only a relatively small bending load. If four thin material sites with strain gauges are used, arranged on the sides of a square, then a half bridge or full bridge can be connected for the X-direction and the Y-direction, respectively, and an output signal can be generated directly for the corner load in the X-direction and the Y-direction, respectively. The strain gauges can be most easily placed if they are positioned on the outside of the thin material sites.
Particularly good reproducibility of the corner load signals is achieved if the thin material sites are formed monolithically from a single component. This prevents slippage in the contact regions.
The invention will now be described in greater detail with reference to the schematic drawings, in which:
The weighing system of
The assembly 7 essentially consists of the pan support 8/9, which is constructed from the pan support upper part 8 and the pan support lower part 9 and the corner load sensor part 10. The pan support lower part 9 is shown again alone in
The corner load sensor part 10 of the assembly 7 is firmly fixed to the load cell 4 of the weighing system by screws 12 (
The operation of the assembly 7 as a corner load sensor is realized in the corner load sensor part 10, as shown in
With the arrangement described, the corner load sensor is situated behind the overload safety mechanism, seen in the force flow direction from the weighing pan to the load cell. In this way, overload forces do not reach the thin material sites 23 of the corner load sensor, so that the thin material sites do not have to be dimensioned for overload forces. This means that the thin material sites can be made thinner and the strain gauges emit a larger signal. The same applies given the presence of a plurality of correctly oriented overload limit stops, including for overload torques.
In the advantageous embodiment of the balance shown, four thin material sites 23 are provided with strain gauges for the corner load sensor. This results in the possibility of particularly simple electronic evaluation of the strain gauge signals. Naturally, three thin material sites 23 with strain gauges also suffice in order to obtain the corner load signals in the X and Y-directions. The three thin material sites must then be arranged, for example, on the sides of an equilateral triangle. Each strain gauge would have to have a fixed resistor added to make a half-bridge and thus be evaluated. The X and Y-corner signals would then have to be calculated from the three signals using known mathematical operations.
As
The above description of the preferred embodiments has been given by way of example. From the disclosure given, those skilled in the art will not only understand the present invention and its attendant advantages, but will also find apparent various changes and modifications to the structures disclosed. The applicant seeks, therefore, to cover all such changes and modifications as fall within the spirit and scope of the invention, as defined by the appended claims, and equivalents thereof.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2008 062 742 | Dec 2008 | DE | national |
This is a Continuation of International Application PCT/EP2009/008129, with an international filing date of Nov. 16, 2009, which was published under PCT Article 21(2) in German, and which claims priority to German Patent Application No. 10 2008 062 742.9, with a filing date of Dec. 17, 2008. The entire disclosures of both applications are incorporated into this application by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4273203 | Blawert et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
5082073 | Stadler et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5096007 | Burkhard | Mar 1992 | A |
5191948 | Strickler | Mar 1993 | A |
5604334 | Luechinger et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5721398 | Balsen et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5844174 | Kuhlmann et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
8153913 | Haefeli et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
20090114455 | Mueller et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2830345 | Feb 1980 | DE |
3003862 | Aug 1981 | DE |
19511353 | Jul 1996 | DE |
10161517 | Jul 2003 | DE |
102006031950 | Nov 2007 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110278077 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP2009/008129 | Nov 2009 | US |
Child | 13108532 | US |