This disclosure relates to an apparatus and method that optimizes media separation from a feed tray of a feeder module.
As used herein, the term “printers” will be understood to broadly include copiers, printers, multifunction devices, etc., with xerographic, inkjet, or other print media printing systems. The term “sheet” as used herein refers to various print media sheets, of various sized and weights, typically relatively thin, flexible or even flimsy paper and sometimes even plastic.
By way of background, current high speed xerographic copy reproduction machines produce copies at a rate in excess of several thousand copies per hour, therefore, the need for a sheet feeder to feed cut copy sheets to the machine in a rapid, dependable manner has been recognized to enable full utilization of the reproduction machine's potential copy output. In particular, for many purely duplicating operations, it is desired to feed cut copy sheets at very high speeds where multiple copies are made of an original placed on the copying platen. In addition, for many high speed copying operations, a document handler to feed documents from a stack to a copy platen of the machine in a rapid dependable manner has also been reorganized to enable full utilization of the machine's potential copy output. These sheet feeders must operate flawlessly to virtually eliminate the risk of damaging the sheets and generate minimum machine shutdowns due to uncorrectable mis-feeds or sheet multi-feeds. It is in the initial separation of the individual sheet from the sheet stack where the greatest number of problems occur.
One of the sheet feeders best known for high speed operation is the top vacuum corrugation feeder with a front air knife, and example of which is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,627,605. In this system, a vacuum plenum with a plurality of friction belts arranged to run over the vacuum plenum is placed at the top of a stack of sheets in a supply tray. At the front of the stack, an air knife is used to inject air into the stack to separate the top sheet from the rest of the stack. In operation, air is injected by the air knife toward the stack to separate the top sheet, the vacuum pulls the separated sheet up and acquires it. Following acquisition, a belt transport drives the sheet forward off the stack of sheets. In this configuration, separation of the next sheet cannot take place until the top sheet has cleared the stack. In this type of feeding system every operation takes place in succession or serially, and therefore, the feeding of subsequent sheets cannot be started until the feeding of the previous sheet has been completed. In addition, the air knife may cause the second sheet to vibrate independent of the rest of the stack in a manner referred to as “flutter”. When the second sheet is in this situation, if it touches the top sheet, it may tend to creep forward slightly with the top sheet. The air knife then may drive the second sheet against the first sheet causing a single or double feeding of sheets. At the appropriate time, during the feed cycle, a valve is actuated establishing flow and hence a negative pressure field over the stack top. This field causes the movement of the top sheet to the vacuum feed head where the sheet is then transported to takeaway rolls. Once the lead edge of the feed sheet is under control of the takeaway rolls, the vacuum is shut off. The trail edge of this sheet exiting the feed head area is the criteria for again activating the vacuum valve for the next feeding.
If however, the lead edge of the fed sheet does not separate from the second sheet, it will cause either a mis-feed or multi-feed, shutting down the machine. It has been found that pre-separating sheets from on another (“fluffing”) in a stack is essential in the obtainment of suitable feeding reliability for high volume feeders. This can be more of an issue with specialty stocks, such as, perforated media, media with varying thicknesses, multi-layered media, heavy weight media, etc. as the stocks may have features that prevent the air from flowing between the sheets and/or may require increased air velocity to separate the sheets. Attempts at solving this problem are included in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,635,921; 4,678,176 and 4,887,805 that variously include fixed front stack fluffer nozzles, vectored auxiliary fluffer nozzles and side stack fluffer nozzles to assist in air knife separation of, for example, severely down curled sheets, etc.
Even with the devices shown in the heretofore-mentioned patents, there is still a need for an improved top vacuum corrugation feeder that can reliably control feeding of specialty media within a printer apparatus.
Accordingly, in answer to the above-mentioned problem, disclosed herein is an improved top vacuum corrugation feeder that includes inboard and outboard fluffer nozzles that are configured with added adjustability in order to allow the direction of air exiting therefrom to be angled toward the lead edge or trail edge of a top few sheets of a sheet stack. This allows the air to overcome barriers created by the design of specialty media that would otherwise trap the air and prevent it from being distributed between sheets. The cross-section of each nozzle is also adjustable, providing a smaller or wider throat which allow the air velocity to be optimized to best separate the sheets in problem areas. In addition, the nozzles are also adjustable along a horizontal plane for positioning the nozzles at desired location along the sheet stack.
As to specific components of the subject apparatus or methods, or alternatives therefor, it will be appreciated that, as normally the case, some such components are known per se' in other apparatus or applications, which may be additionally or alternatively used herein, including those from art cited herein. For example, it will be appreciated by respective engineers and others that many of the particular components mountings, component actuations, or component drive systems illustrated herein are merely exemplary, and that the same novel motions and functions can be provided by many other known or readily available alternatives. All cited references, and their references, are incorporated by reference herein where appropriate for teachings of additional or alternative details, features, and/or technical background. What is well known to those skilled in the art need not be described herein.
Various of the above-mentioned and further features and advantages will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the specific apparatus and its operation or methods described in the example(s) below, and the claims. Thus, they will be better understood from this description of these specific embodiment(s), including the drawing figures (which are approximately to scale) wherein:
While the present disclosure will hereinafter be described in connection with a preferred embodiment, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the disclosure to that embodiment. On the contrary, it is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the disclosure as defined by the appended claims.
Even with the improvements in the above-mention patents, with certain media, it is very difficult for fluffer nozzles working in conjunction with a vacuum corrugation feeder to separate the lead edge of stacked sheets. If the lead edge is not separated, two sheets can be acquired by the feed head. The air knife will be unable to separate them and a multi-sheet feed will result. This can be exacerbated when the media has features such as perforations, varying thickness, multiple layers, heavy weight, etc. One example of difficult to feed media 10 is shown in
Frequently blower speed is increased to create better fluffing performance with specialty stocks. The downside of this approach is that the air system is run off of one blower. Therefore, if the fluffer air velocity is increased, so is the vacuum and air knife air velocity. This can have adverse results such as over corrugation of the sheet, stubbing into a retard plate, and premature wear due to increased forces.
In accordance with the present disclosure, improved adjustable fluffer nozzle arrangements 100 are shown in
For testing, as partially shown in
In
In recapitulation, an apparatus is disclosed that adds three adjustment parameters to the design of the inboard and outboard fluffers within a top vacuum corrugation feeder. One adjustment is the angle of the flow centerline with respect to the normal of the stack face. The second is the taper angle of the fluffer which determines the convergence point and velocity of the flow. And third is the ability to translate the fluffers in a horizontal plane with respect to a top few sheets of a sheet stack in order to position the nozzle in accordance with requirements of particular specialty media. Moreover, angled air fluffers expand media stack fluffing capability by introducing a process direction vector in addition to the normal cross process pattern. It has been found that proper selection of these three parameters allows reliable fluffing and feeding of several non-standard media types including multi-layered label stock. While an embodiment has been shown that facilitates manual adjustment of these parameters, it is contemplated that nozzle adjustment parameters could also be accomplished with automation, if desired. In addition, preset blower configurations could also be enabled for specific applications and adjustable angle and flow rate of the nozzles could be based upon timed exit sensing.
The claims, as originally presented and as they may be amended, encompass variations, alternatives, modifications, improvements, equivalents, and substantial equivalents of the embodiments and teachings disclosed herein, including those that are presently unforeseen or unappreciated, and that, for example, may arise from applicants/patentees and others. Unless specifically recited in a claim, steps or components of claims should not be implied or imported from the specification or any other claims as to any particular order, number, position, size, shape, angle, color, or material.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4627605 | Roller et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4635921 | Thomas | Jan 1987 | A |
4678176 | Roller | Jul 1987 | A |
4887805 | Herbert et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
5090676 | Matsuno | Feb 1992 | A |
5110110 | Wirz | May 1992 | A |
5344135 | Isobe | Sep 1994 | A |
5454556 | Siegel | Oct 1995 | A |
8276905 | Suzuki | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8870179 | Shiraishi | Oct 2014 | B2 |
20100148419 | Suzuki | Jun 2010 | A1 |